Difference between systemctl and service commands












93














systemd gives us the systemctl commands suite which is mostly used to enable services to start at boot time. We can also start, stop, reload, restart and check status of services with the help of systemctl.



We can do, for example, sudo systemctl enable service_name, and service_name will automatically start at boot time. We can also disable services not to start at boot time.



Is the only difference between the service and systemctl commands that systemctl can be used to enable the start of services at run time? Can we use systemctl on any service? What other significant differences are there?










share|improve this question
























  • I think you picked the wrong answer, myself.
    – Evan Carroll
    Dec 17 '17 at 4:58
















93














systemd gives us the systemctl commands suite which is mostly used to enable services to start at boot time. We can also start, stop, reload, restart and check status of services with the help of systemctl.



We can do, for example, sudo systemctl enable service_name, and service_name will automatically start at boot time. We can also disable services not to start at boot time.



Is the only difference between the service and systemctl commands that systemctl can be used to enable the start of services at run time? Can we use systemctl on any service? What other significant differences are there?










share|improve this question
























  • I think you picked the wrong answer, myself.
    – Evan Carroll
    Dec 17 '17 at 4:58














93












93








93


35





systemd gives us the systemctl commands suite which is mostly used to enable services to start at boot time. We can also start, stop, reload, restart and check status of services with the help of systemctl.



We can do, for example, sudo systemctl enable service_name, and service_name will automatically start at boot time. We can also disable services not to start at boot time.



Is the only difference between the service and systemctl commands that systemctl can be used to enable the start of services at run time? Can we use systemctl on any service? What other significant differences are there?










share|improve this question















systemd gives us the systemctl commands suite which is mostly used to enable services to start at boot time. We can also start, stop, reload, restart and check status of services with the help of systemctl.



We can do, for example, sudo systemctl enable service_name, and service_name will automatically start at boot time. We can also disable services not to start at boot time.



Is the only difference between the service and systemctl commands that systemctl can be used to enable the start of services at run time? Can we use systemctl on any service? What other significant differences are there?







command-line services systemd






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Dec 24 at 22:57









Guy Avraham

1136




1136










asked Apr 10 '17 at 21:35









luv.preet

1,36721229




1,36721229












  • I think you picked the wrong answer, myself.
    – Evan Carroll
    Dec 17 '17 at 4:58


















  • I think you picked the wrong answer, myself.
    – Evan Carroll
    Dec 17 '17 at 4:58
















I think you picked the wrong answer, myself.
– Evan Carroll
Dec 17 '17 at 4:58




I think you picked the wrong answer, myself.
– Evan Carroll
Dec 17 '17 at 4:58










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















93














The service command is a wrapper script that allows system administrators to start, stop, and check the status of services without worrying too much about the actual init system being used. Prior to systemd's introduction, it was a wrapper for /etc/init.d scripts and Upstart's initctl command, and now it is a wrapper for these two and systemctl as well.



Use the source, Luke!



It checks for Upstart:





# Operate against system upstart, not session
unset UPSTART_SESSION
if [ -r "/etc/init/${SERVICE}.conf" ] && which initctl >/dev/null
&& initctl version 2>/dev/null | grep -q upstart
&& initctl status ${SERVICE} 2>/dev/null 1>/dev/null
then
# Upstart configuration exists for this job and we're running on upstart


If that doesn't work, it looks for systemd:



if [ -d /run/systemd/system ]; then
is_systemd=1
fi

...

# When this machine is running systemd, standard service calls are turned into
# systemctl calls.
if [ -n "$is_systemd" ]
then


And if that fails as well, it falls back to System V /etc/init.d scripts:



run_via_sysvinit() {
# Otherwise, use the traditional sysvinit
if [ -x "${SERVICEDIR}/${SERVICE}" ]; then
exec env -i LANG="$LANG" LANGUAGE="$LANGUAGE" LC_CTYPE="$LC_CTYPE" LC_NUMERIC="$LC_NUMERIC" LC_TIME="$LC_TIME" LC_COLLATE="$LC_COLLATE" LC_MONETARY="$LC_MONETARY" LC_MESSAGES="$LC_MESSAGES" LC_PAPER="$LC_PAPER" LC_NAME="$LC_NAME" LC_ADDRESS="$LC_ADDRESS" LC_TELEPHONE="$LC_TELEPHONE" LC_MEASUREMENT="$LC_MEASUREMENT" LC_IDENTIFICATION="$LC_IDENTIFICATION" LC_ALL="$LC_ALL" PATH="$PATH" TERM="$TERM" "$SERVICEDIR/$SERVICE" ${ACTION} ${OPTIONS}
else
echo "${SERVICE}: unrecognized service" >&2
exit 1
fi
}

...
run_via_sysvinit


Since the service command is a fairly simple wrapper, it only supports a limited subset of actions compared to what the actual init system might provide.



For portability over various versions of Ubuntu, users can reliably use the service command to start, stop, restart or examine the status of a service. For more complex tasks, however, the actual command being used, be that initctl or systemctl or the /etc/init.d script might have to be used directly.



Further, being a wrapper, the service script in some cases also does more than the direct equivalent command might do. For example:




  • It always executes /etc/init.d scripts in a clean environment. (Note the long env command invocation in the run_via_sysvinit function above.)

  • It maps restart on Upstart systems to a combination of stop/start, since a plain initctl restart will error out if the service isn't running already.


  • It stops sockets when stopping systemd services which have associated sockets:



    case "${ACTION}" in
    restart|status)
    exec systemctl $sctl_args ${ACTION} ${UNIT}
    ;;
    start|stop)
    # Follow the principle of least surprise for SysV people:
    # When running "service foo stop" and foo happens to be a service that
    # has one or more .socket files, we also stop the .socket units.
    # Users who need more control will use systemctl directly.



Upstart services were enabled directly in the service configuration file (or disabled via overrides), and System V scripts were enabled or disabled with the update-rc.d command (which managed symlinks in the /etc/rc* directories), so the service command was never involved in enabling or disabling services on boot.






share|improve this answer

















  • 1




    superb explanation, thanks.
    – Willa O Ng'wana
    May 9 at 21:49



















23















  • systemd is backwards compatible with SysV.

  • loads services parallel at startup

  • it's provides on-demand activation of a service

  • it's dependency based

  • and a lot more I guess...


There are a lot more than what you mentioned that systemctl is capable of.



systemd works with units, there are different type of units: targets, services, sockets, etc. targets are same concept as runlevels, they are a bunch of units together.



You can use systemctl to set or get the default system target.



systemctl get-default


You can go into other targets:



systemctl isolate multiuser.target


Other targets are: multiuser, graphical, recue, emergency, reboot, poweroff.



As you said, you can use systemctl to manage services, some of the other commands related to service management which I'm aware of are:



# Restarts a service only if it is running.
systemctl try-restart name.service

# Reloads configuration if it's possible.
systemctl reload name.service

# try to reload but if it's not possible restarts the service
systemctl reload-or-restart name.service


You can use it to find out about a service status:



systemctl status name.service

systemctl is-active name.service # running
systemctl is-enabled name.service # will be activated when booting
systemctl is-failed name.service # failed to load


You can mask or unmask a service:



systemctl mask name.service
systemctl unmask name.service


Wen you mask a service it will be linked to /dev/null, so manually or automatically other services can't active/enable it. (you should unmask it first).



Another usage of systemctl is to list units:



systemctl list-units


Which list all kind of units, loaded and active.



List service units:



systemctl list-units --type=service


Or to list all available units not just loaded and activated ones:



systemctl list-unit-files


You can create aliases or even control remote machines



systemctl --host ravexina@192.168.56.4 list-units


At the other hand service does what it have to do, managing services and having nothing to do with other peoples business ;)






share|improve this answer



















  • 1




    that was a perfect answer, Is there anything which service can do but not systemctl ?
    – luv.preet
    Apr 10 '17 at 23:10










  • Nothing that I'm aware of that, I think having a look at service man page would be helpful.
    – Ravexina
    Apr 10 '17 at 23:12










  • There's couple obvious differences. Syntax is one. Another is that systemv scripts never dealt with sockets, as far as i know. The fact that systemd is trying to deal with network type of stuff is another, and it's a frequent point of critique. Over all, systemd is trying to do more than just starting services
    – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
    Apr 11 '17 at 1:28










  • I would like to make a complaint here about systemd hiding log messages from failed service start attempts. Pre-systemd, service start would let me see right away why my service wouldn't start. Post-systemd, I have to look at four or five different logs before I can find it. All that said, my comment is undoubtedly off topic and will probably be deleted.
    – Ross Presser
    Apr 11 '17 at 2:23






  • 5




    AFAICS This answer doesn't seem to tell anything about the service command, wasn't that part of the question?
    – ilkkachu
    Apr 11 '17 at 8:04











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "89"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f903354%2fdifference-between-systemctl-and-service-commands%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









93














The service command is a wrapper script that allows system administrators to start, stop, and check the status of services without worrying too much about the actual init system being used. Prior to systemd's introduction, it was a wrapper for /etc/init.d scripts and Upstart's initctl command, and now it is a wrapper for these two and systemctl as well.



Use the source, Luke!



It checks for Upstart:





# Operate against system upstart, not session
unset UPSTART_SESSION
if [ -r "/etc/init/${SERVICE}.conf" ] && which initctl >/dev/null
&& initctl version 2>/dev/null | grep -q upstart
&& initctl status ${SERVICE} 2>/dev/null 1>/dev/null
then
# Upstart configuration exists for this job and we're running on upstart


If that doesn't work, it looks for systemd:



if [ -d /run/systemd/system ]; then
is_systemd=1
fi

...

# When this machine is running systemd, standard service calls are turned into
# systemctl calls.
if [ -n "$is_systemd" ]
then


And if that fails as well, it falls back to System V /etc/init.d scripts:



run_via_sysvinit() {
# Otherwise, use the traditional sysvinit
if [ -x "${SERVICEDIR}/${SERVICE}" ]; then
exec env -i LANG="$LANG" LANGUAGE="$LANGUAGE" LC_CTYPE="$LC_CTYPE" LC_NUMERIC="$LC_NUMERIC" LC_TIME="$LC_TIME" LC_COLLATE="$LC_COLLATE" LC_MONETARY="$LC_MONETARY" LC_MESSAGES="$LC_MESSAGES" LC_PAPER="$LC_PAPER" LC_NAME="$LC_NAME" LC_ADDRESS="$LC_ADDRESS" LC_TELEPHONE="$LC_TELEPHONE" LC_MEASUREMENT="$LC_MEASUREMENT" LC_IDENTIFICATION="$LC_IDENTIFICATION" LC_ALL="$LC_ALL" PATH="$PATH" TERM="$TERM" "$SERVICEDIR/$SERVICE" ${ACTION} ${OPTIONS}
else
echo "${SERVICE}: unrecognized service" >&2
exit 1
fi
}

...
run_via_sysvinit


Since the service command is a fairly simple wrapper, it only supports a limited subset of actions compared to what the actual init system might provide.



For portability over various versions of Ubuntu, users can reliably use the service command to start, stop, restart or examine the status of a service. For more complex tasks, however, the actual command being used, be that initctl or systemctl or the /etc/init.d script might have to be used directly.



Further, being a wrapper, the service script in some cases also does more than the direct equivalent command might do. For example:




  • It always executes /etc/init.d scripts in a clean environment. (Note the long env command invocation in the run_via_sysvinit function above.)

  • It maps restart on Upstart systems to a combination of stop/start, since a plain initctl restart will error out if the service isn't running already.


  • It stops sockets when stopping systemd services which have associated sockets:



    case "${ACTION}" in
    restart|status)
    exec systemctl $sctl_args ${ACTION} ${UNIT}
    ;;
    start|stop)
    # Follow the principle of least surprise for SysV people:
    # When running "service foo stop" and foo happens to be a service that
    # has one or more .socket files, we also stop the .socket units.
    # Users who need more control will use systemctl directly.



Upstart services were enabled directly in the service configuration file (or disabled via overrides), and System V scripts were enabled or disabled with the update-rc.d command (which managed symlinks in the /etc/rc* directories), so the service command was never involved in enabling or disabling services on boot.






share|improve this answer

















  • 1




    superb explanation, thanks.
    – Willa O Ng'wana
    May 9 at 21:49
















93














The service command is a wrapper script that allows system administrators to start, stop, and check the status of services without worrying too much about the actual init system being used. Prior to systemd's introduction, it was a wrapper for /etc/init.d scripts and Upstart's initctl command, and now it is a wrapper for these two and systemctl as well.



Use the source, Luke!



It checks for Upstart:





# Operate against system upstart, not session
unset UPSTART_SESSION
if [ -r "/etc/init/${SERVICE}.conf" ] && which initctl >/dev/null
&& initctl version 2>/dev/null | grep -q upstart
&& initctl status ${SERVICE} 2>/dev/null 1>/dev/null
then
# Upstart configuration exists for this job and we're running on upstart


If that doesn't work, it looks for systemd:



if [ -d /run/systemd/system ]; then
is_systemd=1
fi

...

# When this machine is running systemd, standard service calls are turned into
# systemctl calls.
if [ -n "$is_systemd" ]
then


And if that fails as well, it falls back to System V /etc/init.d scripts:



run_via_sysvinit() {
# Otherwise, use the traditional sysvinit
if [ -x "${SERVICEDIR}/${SERVICE}" ]; then
exec env -i LANG="$LANG" LANGUAGE="$LANGUAGE" LC_CTYPE="$LC_CTYPE" LC_NUMERIC="$LC_NUMERIC" LC_TIME="$LC_TIME" LC_COLLATE="$LC_COLLATE" LC_MONETARY="$LC_MONETARY" LC_MESSAGES="$LC_MESSAGES" LC_PAPER="$LC_PAPER" LC_NAME="$LC_NAME" LC_ADDRESS="$LC_ADDRESS" LC_TELEPHONE="$LC_TELEPHONE" LC_MEASUREMENT="$LC_MEASUREMENT" LC_IDENTIFICATION="$LC_IDENTIFICATION" LC_ALL="$LC_ALL" PATH="$PATH" TERM="$TERM" "$SERVICEDIR/$SERVICE" ${ACTION} ${OPTIONS}
else
echo "${SERVICE}: unrecognized service" >&2
exit 1
fi
}

...
run_via_sysvinit


Since the service command is a fairly simple wrapper, it only supports a limited subset of actions compared to what the actual init system might provide.



For portability over various versions of Ubuntu, users can reliably use the service command to start, stop, restart or examine the status of a service. For more complex tasks, however, the actual command being used, be that initctl or systemctl or the /etc/init.d script might have to be used directly.



Further, being a wrapper, the service script in some cases also does more than the direct equivalent command might do. For example:




  • It always executes /etc/init.d scripts in a clean environment. (Note the long env command invocation in the run_via_sysvinit function above.)

  • It maps restart on Upstart systems to a combination of stop/start, since a plain initctl restart will error out if the service isn't running already.


  • It stops sockets when stopping systemd services which have associated sockets:



    case "${ACTION}" in
    restart|status)
    exec systemctl $sctl_args ${ACTION} ${UNIT}
    ;;
    start|stop)
    # Follow the principle of least surprise for SysV people:
    # When running "service foo stop" and foo happens to be a service that
    # has one or more .socket files, we also stop the .socket units.
    # Users who need more control will use systemctl directly.



Upstart services were enabled directly in the service configuration file (or disabled via overrides), and System V scripts were enabled or disabled with the update-rc.d command (which managed symlinks in the /etc/rc* directories), so the service command was never involved in enabling or disabling services on boot.






share|improve this answer

















  • 1




    superb explanation, thanks.
    – Willa O Ng'wana
    May 9 at 21:49














93












93








93






The service command is a wrapper script that allows system administrators to start, stop, and check the status of services without worrying too much about the actual init system being used. Prior to systemd's introduction, it was a wrapper for /etc/init.d scripts and Upstart's initctl command, and now it is a wrapper for these two and systemctl as well.



Use the source, Luke!



It checks for Upstart:





# Operate against system upstart, not session
unset UPSTART_SESSION
if [ -r "/etc/init/${SERVICE}.conf" ] && which initctl >/dev/null
&& initctl version 2>/dev/null | grep -q upstart
&& initctl status ${SERVICE} 2>/dev/null 1>/dev/null
then
# Upstart configuration exists for this job and we're running on upstart


If that doesn't work, it looks for systemd:



if [ -d /run/systemd/system ]; then
is_systemd=1
fi

...

# When this machine is running systemd, standard service calls are turned into
# systemctl calls.
if [ -n "$is_systemd" ]
then


And if that fails as well, it falls back to System V /etc/init.d scripts:



run_via_sysvinit() {
# Otherwise, use the traditional sysvinit
if [ -x "${SERVICEDIR}/${SERVICE}" ]; then
exec env -i LANG="$LANG" LANGUAGE="$LANGUAGE" LC_CTYPE="$LC_CTYPE" LC_NUMERIC="$LC_NUMERIC" LC_TIME="$LC_TIME" LC_COLLATE="$LC_COLLATE" LC_MONETARY="$LC_MONETARY" LC_MESSAGES="$LC_MESSAGES" LC_PAPER="$LC_PAPER" LC_NAME="$LC_NAME" LC_ADDRESS="$LC_ADDRESS" LC_TELEPHONE="$LC_TELEPHONE" LC_MEASUREMENT="$LC_MEASUREMENT" LC_IDENTIFICATION="$LC_IDENTIFICATION" LC_ALL="$LC_ALL" PATH="$PATH" TERM="$TERM" "$SERVICEDIR/$SERVICE" ${ACTION} ${OPTIONS}
else
echo "${SERVICE}: unrecognized service" >&2
exit 1
fi
}

...
run_via_sysvinit


Since the service command is a fairly simple wrapper, it only supports a limited subset of actions compared to what the actual init system might provide.



For portability over various versions of Ubuntu, users can reliably use the service command to start, stop, restart or examine the status of a service. For more complex tasks, however, the actual command being used, be that initctl or systemctl or the /etc/init.d script might have to be used directly.



Further, being a wrapper, the service script in some cases also does more than the direct equivalent command might do. For example:




  • It always executes /etc/init.d scripts in a clean environment. (Note the long env command invocation in the run_via_sysvinit function above.)

  • It maps restart on Upstart systems to a combination of stop/start, since a plain initctl restart will error out if the service isn't running already.


  • It stops sockets when stopping systemd services which have associated sockets:



    case "${ACTION}" in
    restart|status)
    exec systemctl $sctl_args ${ACTION} ${UNIT}
    ;;
    start|stop)
    # Follow the principle of least surprise for SysV people:
    # When running "service foo stop" and foo happens to be a service that
    # has one or more .socket files, we also stop the .socket units.
    # Users who need more control will use systemctl directly.



Upstart services were enabled directly in the service configuration file (or disabled via overrides), and System V scripts were enabled or disabled with the update-rc.d command (which managed symlinks in the /etc/rc* directories), so the service command was never involved in enabling or disabling services on boot.






share|improve this answer












The service command is a wrapper script that allows system administrators to start, stop, and check the status of services without worrying too much about the actual init system being used. Prior to systemd's introduction, it was a wrapper for /etc/init.d scripts and Upstart's initctl command, and now it is a wrapper for these two and systemctl as well.



Use the source, Luke!



It checks for Upstart:





# Operate against system upstart, not session
unset UPSTART_SESSION
if [ -r "/etc/init/${SERVICE}.conf" ] && which initctl >/dev/null
&& initctl version 2>/dev/null | grep -q upstart
&& initctl status ${SERVICE} 2>/dev/null 1>/dev/null
then
# Upstart configuration exists for this job and we're running on upstart


If that doesn't work, it looks for systemd:



if [ -d /run/systemd/system ]; then
is_systemd=1
fi

...

# When this machine is running systemd, standard service calls are turned into
# systemctl calls.
if [ -n "$is_systemd" ]
then


And if that fails as well, it falls back to System V /etc/init.d scripts:



run_via_sysvinit() {
# Otherwise, use the traditional sysvinit
if [ -x "${SERVICEDIR}/${SERVICE}" ]; then
exec env -i LANG="$LANG" LANGUAGE="$LANGUAGE" LC_CTYPE="$LC_CTYPE" LC_NUMERIC="$LC_NUMERIC" LC_TIME="$LC_TIME" LC_COLLATE="$LC_COLLATE" LC_MONETARY="$LC_MONETARY" LC_MESSAGES="$LC_MESSAGES" LC_PAPER="$LC_PAPER" LC_NAME="$LC_NAME" LC_ADDRESS="$LC_ADDRESS" LC_TELEPHONE="$LC_TELEPHONE" LC_MEASUREMENT="$LC_MEASUREMENT" LC_IDENTIFICATION="$LC_IDENTIFICATION" LC_ALL="$LC_ALL" PATH="$PATH" TERM="$TERM" "$SERVICEDIR/$SERVICE" ${ACTION} ${OPTIONS}
else
echo "${SERVICE}: unrecognized service" >&2
exit 1
fi
}

...
run_via_sysvinit


Since the service command is a fairly simple wrapper, it only supports a limited subset of actions compared to what the actual init system might provide.



For portability over various versions of Ubuntu, users can reliably use the service command to start, stop, restart or examine the status of a service. For more complex tasks, however, the actual command being used, be that initctl or systemctl or the /etc/init.d script might have to be used directly.



Further, being a wrapper, the service script in some cases also does more than the direct equivalent command might do. For example:




  • It always executes /etc/init.d scripts in a clean environment. (Note the long env command invocation in the run_via_sysvinit function above.)

  • It maps restart on Upstart systems to a combination of stop/start, since a plain initctl restart will error out if the service isn't running already.


  • It stops sockets when stopping systemd services which have associated sockets:



    case "${ACTION}" in
    restart|status)
    exec systemctl $sctl_args ${ACTION} ${UNIT}
    ;;
    start|stop)
    # Follow the principle of least surprise for SysV people:
    # When running "service foo stop" and foo happens to be a service that
    # has one or more .socket files, we also stop the .socket units.
    # Users who need more control will use systemctl directly.



Upstart services were enabled directly in the service configuration file (or disabled via overrides), and System V scripts were enabled or disabled with the update-rc.d command (which managed symlinks in the /etc/rc* directories), so the service command was never involved in enabling or disabling services on boot.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Apr 11 '17 at 3:03









muru

1




1








  • 1




    superb explanation, thanks.
    – Willa O Ng'wana
    May 9 at 21:49














  • 1




    superb explanation, thanks.
    – Willa O Ng'wana
    May 9 at 21:49








1




1




superb explanation, thanks.
– Willa O Ng'wana
May 9 at 21:49




superb explanation, thanks.
– Willa O Ng'wana
May 9 at 21:49













23















  • systemd is backwards compatible with SysV.

  • loads services parallel at startup

  • it's provides on-demand activation of a service

  • it's dependency based

  • and a lot more I guess...


There are a lot more than what you mentioned that systemctl is capable of.



systemd works with units, there are different type of units: targets, services, sockets, etc. targets are same concept as runlevels, they are a bunch of units together.



You can use systemctl to set or get the default system target.



systemctl get-default


You can go into other targets:



systemctl isolate multiuser.target


Other targets are: multiuser, graphical, recue, emergency, reboot, poweroff.



As you said, you can use systemctl to manage services, some of the other commands related to service management which I'm aware of are:



# Restarts a service only if it is running.
systemctl try-restart name.service

# Reloads configuration if it's possible.
systemctl reload name.service

# try to reload but if it's not possible restarts the service
systemctl reload-or-restart name.service


You can use it to find out about a service status:



systemctl status name.service

systemctl is-active name.service # running
systemctl is-enabled name.service # will be activated when booting
systemctl is-failed name.service # failed to load


You can mask or unmask a service:



systemctl mask name.service
systemctl unmask name.service


Wen you mask a service it will be linked to /dev/null, so manually or automatically other services can't active/enable it. (you should unmask it first).



Another usage of systemctl is to list units:



systemctl list-units


Which list all kind of units, loaded and active.



List service units:



systemctl list-units --type=service


Or to list all available units not just loaded and activated ones:



systemctl list-unit-files


You can create aliases or even control remote machines



systemctl --host ravexina@192.168.56.4 list-units


At the other hand service does what it have to do, managing services and having nothing to do with other peoples business ;)






share|improve this answer



















  • 1




    that was a perfect answer, Is there anything which service can do but not systemctl ?
    – luv.preet
    Apr 10 '17 at 23:10










  • Nothing that I'm aware of that, I think having a look at service man page would be helpful.
    – Ravexina
    Apr 10 '17 at 23:12










  • There's couple obvious differences. Syntax is one. Another is that systemv scripts never dealt with sockets, as far as i know. The fact that systemd is trying to deal with network type of stuff is another, and it's a frequent point of critique. Over all, systemd is trying to do more than just starting services
    – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
    Apr 11 '17 at 1:28










  • I would like to make a complaint here about systemd hiding log messages from failed service start attempts. Pre-systemd, service start would let me see right away why my service wouldn't start. Post-systemd, I have to look at four or five different logs before I can find it. All that said, my comment is undoubtedly off topic and will probably be deleted.
    – Ross Presser
    Apr 11 '17 at 2:23






  • 5




    AFAICS This answer doesn't seem to tell anything about the service command, wasn't that part of the question?
    – ilkkachu
    Apr 11 '17 at 8:04
















23















  • systemd is backwards compatible with SysV.

  • loads services parallel at startup

  • it's provides on-demand activation of a service

  • it's dependency based

  • and a lot more I guess...


There are a lot more than what you mentioned that systemctl is capable of.



systemd works with units, there are different type of units: targets, services, sockets, etc. targets are same concept as runlevels, they are a bunch of units together.



You can use systemctl to set or get the default system target.



systemctl get-default


You can go into other targets:



systemctl isolate multiuser.target


Other targets are: multiuser, graphical, recue, emergency, reboot, poweroff.



As you said, you can use systemctl to manage services, some of the other commands related to service management which I'm aware of are:



# Restarts a service only if it is running.
systemctl try-restart name.service

# Reloads configuration if it's possible.
systemctl reload name.service

# try to reload but if it's not possible restarts the service
systemctl reload-or-restart name.service


You can use it to find out about a service status:



systemctl status name.service

systemctl is-active name.service # running
systemctl is-enabled name.service # will be activated when booting
systemctl is-failed name.service # failed to load


You can mask or unmask a service:



systemctl mask name.service
systemctl unmask name.service


Wen you mask a service it will be linked to /dev/null, so manually or automatically other services can't active/enable it. (you should unmask it first).



Another usage of systemctl is to list units:



systemctl list-units


Which list all kind of units, loaded and active.



List service units:



systemctl list-units --type=service


Or to list all available units not just loaded and activated ones:



systemctl list-unit-files


You can create aliases or even control remote machines



systemctl --host ravexina@192.168.56.4 list-units


At the other hand service does what it have to do, managing services and having nothing to do with other peoples business ;)






share|improve this answer



















  • 1




    that was a perfect answer, Is there anything which service can do but not systemctl ?
    – luv.preet
    Apr 10 '17 at 23:10










  • Nothing that I'm aware of that, I think having a look at service man page would be helpful.
    – Ravexina
    Apr 10 '17 at 23:12










  • There's couple obvious differences. Syntax is one. Another is that systemv scripts never dealt with sockets, as far as i know. The fact that systemd is trying to deal with network type of stuff is another, and it's a frequent point of critique. Over all, systemd is trying to do more than just starting services
    – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
    Apr 11 '17 at 1:28










  • I would like to make a complaint here about systemd hiding log messages from failed service start attempts. Pre-systemd, service start would let me see right away why my service wouldn't start. Post-systemd, I have to look at four or five different logs before I can find it. All that said, my comment is undoubtedly off topic and will probably be deleted.
    – Ross Presser
    Apr 11 '17 at 2:23






  • 5




    AFAICS This answer doesn't seem to tell anything about the service command, wasn't that part of the question?
    – ilkkachu
    Apr 11 '17 at 8:04














23












23








23







  • systemd is backwards compatible with SysV.

  • loads services parallel at startup

  • it's provides on-demand activation of a service

  • it's dependency based

  • and a lot more I guess...


There are a lot more than what you mentioned that systemctl is capable of.



systemd works with units, there are different type of units: targets, services, sockets, etc. targets are same concept as runlevels, they are a bunch of units together.



You can use systemctl to set or get the default system target.



systemctl get-default


You can go into other targets:



systemctl isolate multiuser.target


Other targets are: multiuser, graphical, recue, emergency, reboot, poweroff.



As you said, you can use systemctl to manage services, some of the other commands related to service management which I'm aware of are:



# Restarts a service only if it is running.
systemctl try-restart name.service

# Reloads configuration if it's possible.
systemctl reload name.service

# try to reload but if it's not possible restarts the service
systemctl reload-or-restart name.service


You can use it to find out about a service status:



systemctl status name.service

systemctl is-active name.service # running
systemctl is-enabled name.service # will be activated when booting
systemctl is-failed name.service # failed to load


You can mask or unmask a service:



systemctl mask name.service
systemctl unmask name.service


Wen you mask a service it will be linked to /dev/null, so manually or automatically other services can't active/enable it. (you should unmask it first).



Another usage of systemctl is to list units:



systemctl list-units


Which list all kind of units, loaded and active.



List service units:



systemctl list-units --type=service


Or to list all available units not just loaded and activated ones:



systemctl list-unit-files


You can create aliases or even control remote machines



systemctl --host ravexina@192.168.56.4 list-units


At the other hand service does what it have to do, managing services and having nothing to do with other peoples business ;)






share|improve this answer















  • systemd is backwards compatible with SysV.

  • loads services parallel at startup

  • it's provides on-demand activation of a service

  • it's dependency based

  • and a lot more I guess...


There are a lot more than what you mentioned that systemctl is capable of.



systemd works with units, there are different type of units: targets, services, sockets, etc. targets are same concept as runlevels, they are a bunch of units together.



You can use systemctl to set or get the default system target.



systemctl get-default


You can go into other targets:



systemctl isolate multiuser.target


Other targets are: multiuser, graphical, recue, emergency, reboot, poweroff.



As you said, you can use systemctl to manage services, some of the other commands related to service management which I'm aware of are:



# Restarts a service only if it is running.
systemctl try-restart name.service

# Reloads configuration if it's possible.
systemctl reload name.service

# try to reload but if it's not possible restarts the service
systemctl reload-or-restart name.service


You can use it to find out about a service status:



systemctl status name.service

systemctl is-active name.service # running
systemctl is-enabled name.service # will be activated when booting
systemctl is-failed name.service # failed to load


You can mask or unmask a service:



systemctl mask name.service
systemctl unmask name.service


Wen you mask a service it will be linked to /dev/null, so manually or automatically other services can't active/enable it. (you should unmask it first).



Another usage of systemctl is to list units:



systemctl list-units


Which list all kind of units, loaded and active.



List service units:



systemctl list-units --type=service


Or to list all available units not just loaded and activated ones:



systemctl list-unit-files


You can create aliases or even control remote machines



systemctl --host ravexina@192.168.56.4 list-units


At the other hand service does what it have to do, managing services and having nothing to do with other peoples business ;)







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Apr 10 '17 at 22:04

























answered Apr 10 '17 at 21:53









Ravexina

31.1k1481109




31.1k1481109








  • 1




    that was a perfect answer, Is there anything which service can do but not systemctl ?
    – luv.preet
    Apr 10 '17 at 23:10










  • Nothing that I'm aware of that, I think having a look at service man page would be helpful.
    – Ravexina
    Apr 10 '17 at 23:12










  • There's couple obvious differences. Syntax is one. Another is that systemv scripts never dealt with sockets, as far as i know. The fact that systemd is trying to deal with network type of stuff is another, and it's a frequent point of critique. Over all, systemd is trying to do more than just starting services
    – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
    Apr 11 '17 at 1:28










  • I would like to make a complaint here about systemd hiding log messages from failed service start attempts. Pre-systemd, service start would let me see right away why my service wouldn't start. Post-systemd, I have to look at four or five different logs before I can find it. All that said, my comment is undoubtedly off topic and will probably be deleted.
    – Ross Presser
    Apr 11 '17 at 2:23






  • 5




    AFAICS This answer doesn't seem to tell anything about the service command, wasn't that part of the question?
    – ilkkachu
    Apr 11 '17 at 8:04














  • 1




    that was a perfect answer, Is there anything which service can do but not systemctl ?
    – luv.preet
    Apr 10 '17 at 23:10










  • Nothing that I'm aware of that, I think having a look at service man page would be helpful.
    – Ravexina
    Apr 10 '17 at 23:12










  • There's couple obvious differences. Syntax is one. Another is that systemv scripts never dealt with sockets, as far as i know. The fact that systemd is trying to deal with network type of stuff is another, and it's a frequent point of critique. Over all, systemd is trying to do more than just starting services
    – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
    Apr 11 '17 at 1:28










  • I would like to make a complaint here about systemd hiding log messages from failed service start attempts. Pre-systemd, service start would let me see right away why my service wouldn't start. Post-systemd, I have to look at four or five different logs before I can find it. All that said, my comment is undoubtedly off topic and will probably be deleted.
    – Ross Presser
    Apr 11 '17 at 2:23






  • 5




    AFAICS This answer doesn't seem to tell anything about the service command, wasn't that part of the question?
    – ilkkachu
    Apr 11 '17 at 8:04








1




1




that was a perfect answer, Is there anything which service can do but not systemctl ?
– luv.preet
Apr 10 '17 at 23:10




that was a perfect answer, Is there anything which service can do but not systemctl ?
– luv.preet
Apr 10 '17 at 23:10












Nothing that I'm aware of that, I think having a look at service man page would be helpful.
– Ravexina
Apr 10 '17 at 23:12




Nothing that I'm aware of that, I think having a look at service man page would be helpful.
– Ravexina
Apr 10 '17 at 23:12












There's couple obvious differences. Syntax is one. Another is that systemv scripts never dealt with sockets, as far as i know. The fact that systemd is trying to deal with network type of stuff is another, and it's a frequent point of critique. Over all, systemd is trying to do more than just starting services
– Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
Apr 11 '17 at 1:28




There's couple obvious differences. Syntax is one. Another is that systemv scripts never dealt with sockets, as far as i know. The fact that systemd is trying to deal with network type of stuff is another, and it's a frequent point of critique. Over all, systemd is trying to do more than just starting services
– Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
Apr 11 '17 at 1:28












I would like to make a complaint here about systemd hiding log messages from failed service start attempts. Pre-systemd, service start would let me see right away why my service wouldn't start. Post-systemd, I have to look at four or five different logs before I can find it. All that said, my comment is undoubtedly off topic and will probably be deleted.
– Ross Presser
Apr 11 '17 at 2:23




I would like to make a complaint here about systemd hiding log messages from failed service start attempts. Pre-systemd, service start would let me see right away why my service wouldn't start. Post-systemd, I have to look at four or five different logs before I can find it. All that said, my comment is undoubtedly off topic and will probably be deleted.
– Ross Presser
Apr 11 '17 at 2:23




5




5




AFAICS This answer doesn't seem to tell anything about the service command, wasn't that part of the question?
– ilkkachu
Apr 11 '17 at 8:04




AFAICS This answer doesn't seem to tell anything about the service command, wasn't that part of the question?
– ilkkachu
Apr 11 '17 at 8:04


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Ask Ubuntu!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f903354%2fdifference-between-systemctl-and-service-commands%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

How did Captain America manage to do this?

迪纳利

南乌拉尔铁路局