apt upgrade reporting in bytes and 10000+%












0















I have a server running 16.04 and when I run apt upgrade it doesn't report the correct package size or percentage:




76% [1 jenkins 35.5 MB/262 B 13457392%]



I've also noticed that download speeds are much slower than other servers from the same provider.



What could cause this and how do I fix it?










share|improve this question























  • Check the configuration and the sources.list. Try using the main repositories or nearer mirrors.

    – EnzoR
    Oct 2 '18 at 16:10
















0















I have a server running 16.04 and when I run apt upgrade it doesn't report the correct package size or percentage:




76% [1 jenkins 35.5 MB/262 B 13457392%]



I've also noticed that download speeds are much slower than other servers from the same provider.



What could cause this and how do I fix it?










share|improve this question























  • Check the configuration and the sources.list. Try using the main repositories or nearer mirrors.

    – EnzoR
    Oct 2 '18 at 16:10














0












0








0








I have a server running 16.04 and when I run apt upgrade it doesn't report the correct package size or percentage:




76% [1 jenkins 35.5 MB/262 B 13457392%]



I've also noticed that download speeds are much slower than other servers from the same provider.



What could cause this and how do I fix it?










share|improve this question














I have a server running 16.04 and when I run apt upgrade it doesn't report the correct package size or percentage:




76% [1 jenkins 35.5 MB/262 B 13457392%]



I've also noticed that download speeds are much slower than other servers from the same provider.



What could cause this and how do I fix it?







apt






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Oct 2 '18 at 15:44









digitaldigital

1238




1238













  • Check the configuration and the sources.list. Try using the main repositories or nearer mirrors.

    – EnzoR
    Oct 2 '18 at 16:10



















  • Check the configuration and the sources.list. Try using the main repositories or nearer mirrors.

    – EnzoR
    Oct 2 '18 at 16:10

















Check the configuration and the sources.list. Try using the main repositories or nearer mirrors.

– EnzoR
Oct 2 '18 at 16:10





Check the configuration and the sources.list. Try using the main repositories or nearer mirrors.

– EnzoR
Oct 2 '18 at 16:10










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0














So in this peculiar case changing the source package location from https to http fixed the issue.






share|improve this answer
























  • What likely happened is that apt went to determine how large the download is, which would be done by inspecting the Content-Length header of the HTTP response, but it likely was a redirect (262 bytes) at which point the real download started which was much larger.

    – Kristopher Ives
    2 days ago











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "89"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1080342%2fapt-upgrade-reporting-in-bytes-and-10000%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









0














So in this peculiar case changing the source package location from https to http fixed the issue.






share|improve this answer
























  • What likely happened is that apt went to determine how large the download is, which would be done by inspecting the Content-Length header of the HTTP response, but it likely was a redirect (262 bytes) at which point the real download started which was much larger.

    – Kristopher Ives
    2 days ago
















0














So in this peculiar case changing the source package location from https to http fixed the issue.






share|improve this answer
























  • What likely happened is that apt went to determine how large the download is, which would be done by inspecting the Content-Length header of the HTTP response, but it likely was a redirect (262 bytes) at which point the real download started which was much larger.

    – Kristopher Ives
    2 days ago














0












0








0







So in this peculiar case changing the source package location from https to http fixed the issue.






share|improve this answer













So in this peculiar case changing the source package location from https to http fixed the issue.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 2 days ago









digitaldigital

1238




1238













  • What likely happened is that apt went to determine how large the download is, which would be done by inspecting the Content-Length header of the HTTP response, but it likely was a redirect (262 bytes) at which point the real download started which was much larger.

    – Kristopher Ives
    2 days ago



















  • What likely happened is that apt went to determine how large the download is, which would be done by inspecting the Content-Length header of the HTTP response, but it likely was a redirect (262 bytes) at which point the real download started which was much larger.

    – Kristopher Ives
    2 days ago

















What likely happened is that apt went to determine how large the download is, which would be done by inspecting the Content-Length header of the HTTP response, but it likely was a redirect (262 bytes) at which point the real download started which was much larger.

– Kristopher Ives
2 days ago





What likely happened is that apt went to determine how large the download is, which would be done by inspecting the Content-Length header of the HTTP response, but it likely was a redirect (262 bytes) at which point the real download started which was much larger.

– Kristopher Ives
2 days ago


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Ask Ubuntu!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1080342%2fapt-upgrade-reporting-in-bytes-and-10000%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

How did Captain America manage to do this?

迪纳利

南乌拉尔铁路局