Find a file based on specifications
1
Maybe this is a duplicate but how do I find a file (that I don't know the name of) based on some specifications?
For example how do I find a file that:
- Is human-readable
- Has exactly 1033 bytes in size
- Is not executable
In a certain directory with tons of files, some executable and some non human-readable?
files filesystem directory find
asked Jan 11 at 14:42
PeroPero
213
New contributor
Pero is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
1
Maybe this is a duplicate but how do I find a file (that I don't know the name of) based on some specifications?
For example how do I find a file that:
- Is human-readable
- Has exactly 1033 bytes in size
- Is not executable
In a certain directory with tons of files, some executable and some non human-readable?
files filesystem directory find
asked Jan 11 at 14:42
PeroPero
213
New contributor
Pero is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
1
If you runman findon your system, it will show you all the commands you can use to find exactly what you are looking for.
– Terrance
Jan 11 at 14:48
3
What exactly do you mean by human-readable? Not binary?
– terdon♦
Jan 11 at 14:56
You may also need to consider by whom the file should be "not executable"
– steeldriver
Jan 11 at 15:32
@terdon I suppose it's readable in the sense of non-machine code
– Pero
2 days ago
add a comment |
1
1
1
2
Maybe this is a duplicate but how do I find a file (that I don't know the name of) based on some specifications?
For example how do I find a file that:
- Is human-readable
- Has exactly 1033 bytes in size
- Is not executable
In a certain directory with tons of files, some executable and some non human-readable?
files filesystem directory find
asked Jan 11 at 14:42
PeroPero
213
New contributor
Pero is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Maybe this is a duplicate but how do I find a file (that I don't know the name of) based on some specifications?
For example how do I find a file that:
- Is human-readable
- Has exactly 1033 bytes in size
- Is not executable
In a certain directory with tons of files, some executable and some non human-readable?
files filesystem directory find
files filesystem directory find
asked Jan 11 at 14:42
PeroPero
213
New contributor
Pero is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked Jan 11 at 14:42
PeroPero
213
New contributor
Pero is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked Jan 11 at 14:42
PeroPero
213
New contributor
Pero is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked Jan 11 at 14:42
PeroPero
213
asked Jan 11 at 14:42
PeroPero
213
213
New contributor
Pero is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Pero is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Pero is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
1
If you runman findon your system, it will show you all the commands you can use to find exactly what you are looking for.
– Terrance
Jan 11 at 14:48
3
What exactly do you mean by human-readable? Not binary?
– terdon♦
Jan 11 at 14:56
You may also need to consider by whom the file should be "not executable"
– steeldriver
Jan 11 at 15:32
@terdon I suppose it's readable in the sense of non-machine code
– Pero
2 days ago
add a comment |
1
If you runman findon your system, it will show you all the commands you can use to find exactly what you are looking for.
– Terrance
Jan 11 at 14:48
3
What exactly do you mean by human-readable? Not binary?
– terdon♦
Jan 11 at 14:56
You may also need to consider by whom the file should be "not executable"
– steeldriver
Jan 11 at 15:32
@terdon I suppose it's readable in the sense of non-machine code
– Pero
2 days ago
1
1
If you run
man find on your system, it will show you all the commands you can use to find exactly what you are looking for.– Terrance
Jan 11 at 14:48
If you run
man find on your system, it will show you all the commands you can use to find exactly what you are looking for.– Terrance
Jan 11 at 14:48
3
3
What exactly do you mean by human-readable? Not binary?
– terdon♦
Jan 11 at 14:56
What exactly do you mean by human-readable? Not binary?
– terdon♦
Jan 11 at 14:56
You may also need to consider by whom the file should be "not executable"
– steeldriver
Jan 11 at 15:32
You may also need to consider by whom the file should be "not executable"
– steeldriver
Jan 11 at 15:32
@terdon I suppose it's readable in the sense of non-machine code
– Pero
2 days ago
@terdon I suppose it's readable in the sense of non-machine code
– Pero
2 days ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1
Thanks to Terrance's comment, I found the answer.
You can simply do find -readable -size 1033c, that finds a readable file with the size of 1033 bytes.
edited Jan 11 at 15:29
Zanna
50.4k13133241
answered Jan 11 at 14:56
PeroPero
213
New contributor
Pero is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
3
"readable" and "human-readable" are not generally considered to be the same thing
– steeldriver
Jan 11 at 15:01
In this case I suppose it's readable in the sense of non-machine code
– Pero
2 days ago
@Pero then this doesn't do what you want. The readable flag will find files that your user has read access to, not files that you as a human can necessarily read. It is about permissions.
– terdon♦
2 days ago
Well, found it anyways, I had read permissions and it was the only file with 1033 bytes in size, so...
– Pero
2 days ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "89"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Pero is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
draft saved
draft discarded
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1108882%2ffind-a-file-based-on-specifications%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
1
Thanks to Terrance's comment, I found the answer.
You can simply do find -readable -size 1033c, that finds a readable file with the size of 1033 bytes.
edited Jan 11 at 15:29
Zanna
50.4k13133241
answered Jan 11 at 14:56
PeroPero
213
New contributor
Pero is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
3
"readable" and "human-readable" are not generally considered to be the same thing
– steeldriver
Jan 11 at 15:01
In this case I suppose it's readable in the sense of non-machine code
– Pero
2 days ago
@Pero then this doesn't do what you want. The readable flag will find files that your user has read access to, not files that you as a human can necessarily read. It is about permissions.
– terdon♦
2 days ago
Well, found it anyways, I had read permissions and it was the only file with 1033 bytes in size, so...
– Pero
2 days ago
add a comment |
1
Thanks to Terrance's comment, I found the answer.
You can simply do find -readable -size 1033c, that finds a readable file with the size of 1033 bytes.
edited Jan 11 at 15:29
Zanna
50.4k13133241
answered Jan 11 at 14:56
PeroPero
213
New contributor
Pero is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
3
"readable" and "human-readable" are not generally considered to be the same thing
– steeldriver
Jan 11 at 15:01
In this case I suppose it's readable in the sense of non-machine code
– Pero
2 days ago
@Pero then this doesn't do what you want. The readable flag will find files that your user has read access to, not files that you as a human can necessarily read. It is about permissions.
– terdon♦
2 days ago
Well, found it anyways, I had read permissions and it was the only file with 1033 bytes in size, so...
– Pero
2 days ago
add a comment |
1
1
1
Thanks to Terrance's comment, I found the answer.
You can simply do find -readable -size 1033c, that finds a readable file with the size of 1033 bytes.
edited Jan 11 at 15:29
Zanna
50.4k13133241
answered Jan 11 at 14:56
PeroPero
213
New contributor
Pero is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks to Terrance's comment, I found the answer.
You can simply do find -readable -size 1033c, that finds a readable file with the size of 1033 bytes.
edited Jan 11 at 15:29
Zanna
50.4k13133241
answered Jan 11 at 14:56
PeroPero
213
New contributor
Pero is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited Jan 11 at 15:29
Zanna
50.4k13133241
edited Jan 11 at 15:29
Zanna
50.4k13133241
edited Jan 11 at 15:29
Zanna
50.4k13133241
50.4k13133241
answered Jan 11 at 14:56
PeroPero
213
New contributor
Pero is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered Jan 11 at 14:56
PeroPero
213
answered Jan 11 at 14:56
PeroPero
213
213
New contributor
Pero is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Pero is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Pero is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
3
"readable" and "human-readable" are not generally considered to be the same thing
– steeldriver
Jan 11 at 15:01
In this case I suppose it's readable in the sense of non-machine code
– Pero
2 days ago
@Pero then this doesn't do what you want. The readable flag will find files that your user has read access to, not files that you as a human can necessarily read. It is about permissions.
– terdon♦
2 days ago
Well, found it anyways, I had read permissions and it was the only file with 1033 bytes in size, so...
– Pero
2 days ago
add a comment |
3
"readable" and "human-readable" are not generally considered to be the same thing
– steeldriver
Jan 11 at 15:01
In this case I suppose it's readable in the sense of non-machine code
– Pero
2 days ago
@Pero then this doesn't do what you want. The readable flag will find files that your user has read access to, not files that you as a human can necessarily read. It is about permissions.
– terdon♦
2 days ago
Well, found it anyways, I had read permissions and it was the only file with 1033 bytes in size, so...
– Pero
2 days ago
3
3
"readable" and "human-readable" are not generally considered to be the same thing
– steeldriver
Jan 11 at 15:01
"readable" and "human-readable" are not generally considered to be the same thing
– steeldriver
Jan 11 at 15:01
In this case I suppose it's readable in the sense of non-machine code
– Pero
2 days ago
In this case I suppose it's readable in the sense of non-machine code
– Pero
2 days ago
@Pero then this doesn't do what you want. The readable flag will find files that your user has read access to, not files that you as a human can necessarily read. It is about permissions.
– terdon♦
2 days ago
@Pero then this doesn't do what you want. The readable flag will find files that your user has read access to, not files that you as a human can necessarily read. It is about permissions.
– terdon♦
2 days ago
Well, found it anyways, I had read permissions and it was the only file with 1033 bytes in size, so...
– Pero
2 days ago
Well, found it anyways, I had read permissions and it was the only file with 1033 bytes in size, so...
– Pero
2 days ago
add a comment |
Pero is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
draft saved
draft discarded
Pero is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Pero is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Pero is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Ask Ubuntu!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
draft saved
draft discarded
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1108882%2ffind-a-file-based-on-specifications%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
If you run
man findon your system, it will show you all the commands you can use to find exactly what you are looking for.– Terrance
Jan 11 at 14:48
3
What exactly do you mean by human-readable? Not binary?
– terdon♦
Jan 11 at 14:56
You may also need to consider by whom the file should be "not executable"
– steeldriver
Jan 11 at 15:32
@terdon I suppose it's readable in the sense of non-machine code
– Pero
2 days ago