mount works on some directory but not on other
3
I have a Beagle Bone Black with an ArmV7 processor running Ubuntu 18.04. I have a 64G microSD card that is partitioned as follows:
Disk /dev/mmcblk0: 58 GiB, 62209916928 bytes, 121503744 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disklabel type: dos
Disk identifier: 0xdbf8b7d8
Device Boot Start End Sectors Size Id Type
/dev/mmcblk0p1 2048 4098047 4096000 2G 83 Linux
/dev/mmcblk0p2 4098048 121503743 117405696 56G b W95 FAT32
I would like to mount partition 2 on /media/sd:
> root@bbbtest:~# mount -v /dev/mmcblk0p2 /media/sd
mount: /dev/mmcblk0p2 mounted on /media/sd.
Note that I am logged in as root. Looks good but:
> root@bbbtest:~# lsblk
NAME MAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT
mmcblk0 179:0 0 58G 0 disk
├─mmcblk0p1 179:1 0 2G 0 part /usr
└─mmcblk0p2 179:2 0 56G 0 part
mmcblk1 179:8 0 1.8G 0 disk
└─mmcblk1p1 179:9 0 1.8G 0 part /
mmcblk1boot0 179:16 0 1M 1 disk
mmcblk1boot1 179:24 0 1M 1 disk
mmcblk1rpmb 179:32 0 128K 0 disk
Device is not mounted but if I mount it on /root/xxx
> root@bbbtest:~# mount -v /dev/mmcblk0p2 /root/xxx
mount: /dev/mmcblk0p2 mounted on /root/xxx.
root@bbbtest:~# lsblk
NAME MAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT
mmcblk0 179:0 0 58G 0 disk
├─mmcblk0p1 179:1 0 2G 0 part /usr
└─mmcblk0p2 179:2 0 56G 0 part /root/xxx
mmcblk1 179:8 0 1.8G 0 disk
└─mmcblk1p1 179:9 0 1.8G 0 part /
mmcblk1boot0 179:16 0 1M 1 disk
mmcblk1boot1 179:24 0 1M 1 disk
mmcblk1rpmb 179:32 0 128K 0 disk
It mounts just fine. I noted that the date of directory xxx is Dec 31 1969 and I can't change the mode bits. As requested, I did df -hTa /media/sd
root@bbbtest:/media# df -hTa /media/sd
Filesystem Type Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/mmcblk1p1 ext4 1.8G 730M 931M 44% /
and df -hTa /media which gave the same result.
However I also created directory /mnt/sd and had no difficulty mounting the partition there which solved my problem practically. I am still curious as to why /media/sd did not work
root@bbbtest:/media# mount -L BKUPFS
root@bbbtest:/media# lsblk
NAME MAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT
mmcblk0 179:0 0 58G 0 disk
├─mmcblk0p1 179:1 0 2G 0 part /usr
└─mmcblk0p2 179:2 0 56G 0 part /mnt/sd
mmcblk1 179:8 0 1.8G 0 disk
└─mmcblk1p1 179:9 0 1.8G 0 part /
mmcblk1boot0 179:16 0 1M 1 disk
mmcblk1boot1 179:24 0 1M 1 disk
mmcblk1rpmb 179:32 0 128K 0 disk
As requested, I did
root@bbbprod:~# dmesg -C
root@bbbprod:~# mount -vvv /dev/mmcblk0p2 /media/sd
mount: /dev/mmcblk0p2 mounted on /media/sd.
Then checked with mount which showed that it was not really mounted and did dmesg.
root@bbbprod:~# dmesg
root@bbbprod:~#
mount
asked Dec 30 '18 at 17:05
Yves
162
New contributor
Yves is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
3
I have a Beagle Bone Black with an ArmV7 processor running Ubuntu 18.04. I have a 64G microSD card that is partitioned as follows:
Disk /dev/mmcblk0: 58 GiB, 62209916928 bytes, 121503744 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disklabel type: dos
Disk identifier: 0xdbf8b7d8
Device Boot Start End Sectors Size Id Type
/dev/mmcblk0p1 2048 4098047 4096000 2G 83 Linux
/dev/mmcblk0p2 4098048 121503743 117405696 56G b W95 FAT32
I would like to mount partition 2 on /media/sd:
> root@bbbtest:~# mount -v /dev/mmcblk0p2 /media/sd
mount: /dev/mmcblk0p2 mounted on /media/sd.
Note that I am logged in as root. Looks good but:
> root@bbbtest:~# lsblk
NAME MAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT
mmcblk0 179:0 0 58G 0 disk
├─mmcblk0p1 179:1 0 2G 0 part /usr
└─mmcblk0p2 179:2 0 56G 0 part
mmcblk1 179:8 0 1.8G 0 disk
└─mmcblk1p1 179:9 0 1.8G 0 part /
mmcblk1boot0 179:16 0 1M 1 disk
mmcblk1boot1 179:24 0 1M 1 disk
mmcblk1rpmb 179:32 0 128K 0 disk
Device is not mounted but if I mount it on /root/xxx
> root@bbbtest:~# mount -v /dev/mmcblk0p2 /root/xxx
mount: /dev/mmcblk0p2 mounted on /root/xxx.
root@bbbtest:~# lsblk
NAME MAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT
mmcblk0 179:0 0 58G 0 disk
├─mmcblk0p1 179:1 0 2G 0 part /usr
└─mmcblk0p2 179:2 0 56G 0 part /root/xxx
mmcblk1 179:8 0 1.8G 0 disk
└─mmcblk1p1 179:9 0 1.8G 0 part /
mmcblk1boot0 179:16 0 1M 1 disk
mmcblk1boot1 179:24 0 1M 1 disk
mmcblk1rpmb 179:32 0 128K 0 disk
It mounts just fine. I noted that the date of directory xxx is Dec 31 1969 and I can't change the mode bits. As requested, I did df -hTa /media/sd
root@bbbtest:/media# df -hTa /media/sd
Filesystem Type Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/mmcblk1p1 ext4 1.8G 730M 931M 44% /
and df -hTa /media which gave the same result.
However I also created directory /mnt/sd and had no difficulty mounting the partition there which solved my problem practically. I am still curious as to why /media/sd did not work
root@bbbtest:/media# mount -L BKUPFS
root@bbbtest:/media# lsblk
NAME MAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT
mmcblk0 179:0 0 58G 0 disk
├─mmcblk0p1 179:1 0 2G 0 part /usr
└─mmcblk0p2 179:2 0 56G 0 part /mnt/sd
mmcblk1 179:8 0 1.8G 0 disk
└─mmcblk1p1 179:9 0 1.8G 0 part /
mmcblk1boot0 179:16 0 1M 1 disk
mmcblk1boot1 179:24 0 1M 1 disk
mmcblk1rpmb 179:32 0 128K 0 disk
As requested, I did
root@bbbprod:~# dmesg -C
root@bbbprod:~# mount -vvv /dev/mmcblk0p2 /media/sd
mount: /dev/mmcblk0p2 mounted on /media/sd.
Then checked with mount which showed that it was not really mounted and did dmesg.
root@bbbprod:~# dmesg
root@bbbprod:~#
mount
asked Dec 30 '18 at 17:05
Yves
162
New contributor
Yves is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Is it actually not mounted or doeslsblkjust do not show the mount? Use the command ``mount` ordf -hTa /media/sdto verify if it is mounted. Please also add the output ofdf -hTa /mediato your question by editing the question.
– Thomas
Dec 30 '18 at 17:21
Thanks Thomas. I did as you asked. The partition was not mounted. It mounted fine on /root/xxx and /mnt/sd. I am really curious as to what was special about /media/sd.
– Yves
Dec 30 '18 at 20:52
Hm, strange. Is there anything in the kernel log? Dodmesg -C, thenmount -vvv /dev/mmcblk0p2 /media/sdand thendmesg. This should give you an output and add that to your question. A complete output ofmountwould also be helpful.
– Thomas
Dec 31 '18 at 10:30
Still not mounting. Strange that it mounted fine on /root/xxx and /mnt/sd. I opted to mount it on /mnt/sd and solved the problem but it is really strange.
– Yves
Dec 31 '18 at 23:04
add a comment |
3
3
3
I have a Beagle Bone Black with an ArmV7 processor running Ubuntu 18.04. I have a 64G microSD card that is partitioned as follows:
Disk /dev/mmcblk0: 58 GiB, 62209916928 bytes, 121503744 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disklabel type: dos
Disk identifier: 0xdbf8b7d8
Device Boot Start End Sectors Size Id Type
/dev/mmcblk0p1 2048 4098047 4096000 2G 83 Linux
/dev/mmcblk0p2 4098048 121503743 117405696 56G b W95 FAT32
I would like to mount partition 2 on /media/sd:
> root@bbbtest:~# mount -v /dev/mmcblk0p2 /media/sd
mount: /dev/mmcblk0p2 mounted on /media/sd.
Note that I am logged in as root. Looks good but:
> root@bbbtest:~# lsblk
NAME MAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT
mmcblk0 179:0 0 58G 0 disk
├─mmcblk0p1 179:1 0 2G 0 part /usr
└─mmcblk0p2 179:2 0 56G 0 part
mmcblk1 179:8 0 1.8G 0 disk
└─mmcblk1p1 179:9 0 1.8G 0 part /
mmcblk1boot0 179:16 0 1M 1 disk
mmcblk1boot1 179:24 0 1M 1 disk
mmcblk1rpmb 179:32 0 128K 0 disk
Device is not mounted but if I mount it on /root/xxx
> root@bbbtest:~# mount -v /dev/mmcblk0p2 /root/xxx
mount: /dev/mmcblk0p2 mounted on /root/xxx.
root@bbbtest:~# lsblk
NAME MAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT
mmcblk0 179:0 0 58G 0 disk
├─mmcblk0p1 179:1 0 2G 0 part /usr
└─mmcblk0p2 179:2 0 56G 0 part /root/xxx
mmcblk1 179:8 0 1.8G 0 disk
└─mmcblk1p1 179:9 0 1.8G 0 part /
mmcblk1boot0 179:16 0 1M 1 disk
mmcblk1boot1 179:24 0 1M 1 disk
mmcblk1rpmb 179:32 0 128K 0 disk
It mounts just fine. I noted that the date of directory xxx is Dec 31 1969 and I can't change the mode bits. As requested, I did df -hTa /media/sd
root@bbbtest:/media# df -hTa /media/sd
Filesystem Type Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/mmcblk1p1 ext4 1.8G 730M 931M 44% /
and df -hTa /media which gave the same result.
However I also created directory /mnt/sd and had no difficulty mounting the partition there which solved my problem practically. I am still curious as to why /media/sd did not work
root@bbbtest:/media# mount -L BKUPFS
root@bbbtest:/media# lsblk
NAME MAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT
mmcblk0 179:0 0 58G 0 disk
├─mmcblk0p1 179:1 0 2G 0 part /usr
└─mmcblk0p2 179:2 0 56G 0 part /mnt/sd
mmcblk1 179:8 0 1.8G 0 disk
└─mmcblk1p1 179:9 0 1.8G 0 part /
mmcblk1boot0 179:16 0 1M 1 disk
mmcblk1boot1 179:24 0 1M 1 disk
mmcblk1rpmb 179:32 0 128K 0 disk
As requested, I did
root@bbbprod:~# dmesg -C
root@bbbprod:~# mount -vvv /dev/mmcblk0p2 /media/sd
mount: /dev/mmcblk0p2 mounted on /media/sd.
Then checked with mount which showed that it was not really mounted and did dmesg.
root@bbbprod:~# dmesg
root@bbbprod:~#
mount
asked Dec 30 '18 at 17:05
Yves
162
New contributor
Yves is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
I have a Beagle Bone Black with an ArmV7 processor running Ubuntu 18.04. I have a 64G microSD card that is partitioned as follows:
Disk /dev/mmcblk0: 58 GiB, 62209916928 bytes, 121503744 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disklabel type: dos
Disk identifier: 0xdbf8b7d8
Device Boot Start End Sectors Size Id Type
/dev/mmcblk0p1 2048 4098047 4096000 2G 83 Linux
/dev/mmcblk0p2 4098048 121503743 117405696 56G b W95 FAT32
I would like to mount partition 2 on /media/sd:
> root@bbbtest:~# mount -v /dev/mmcblk0p2 /media/sd
mount: /dev/mmcblk0p2 mounted on /media/sd.
Note that I am logged in as root. Looks good but:
> root@bbbtest:~# lsblk
NAME MAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT
mmcblk0 179:0 0 58G 0 disk
├─mmcblk0p1 179:1 0 2G 0 part /usr
└─mmcblk0p2 179:2 0 56G 0 part
mmcblk1 179:8 0 1.8G 0 disk
└─mmcblk1p1 179:9 0 1.8G 0 part /
mmcblk1boot0 179:16 0 1M 1 disk
mmcblk1boot1 179:24 0 1M 1 disk
mmcblk1rpmb 179:32 0 128K 0 disk
Device is not mounted but if I mount it on /root/xxx
> root@bbbtest:~# mount -v /dev/mmcblk0p2 /root/xxx
mount: /dev/mmcblk0p2 mounted on /root/xxx.
root@bbbtest:~# lsblk
NAME MAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT
mmcblk0 179:0 0 58G 0 disk
├─mmcblk0p1 179:1 0 2G 0 part /usr
└─mmcblk0p2 179:2 0 56G 0 part /root/xxx
mmcblk1 179:8 0 1.8G 0 disk
└─mmcblk1p1 179:9 0 1.8G 0 part /
mmcblk1boot0 179:16 0 1M 1 disk
mmcblk1boot1 179:24 0 1M 1 disk
mmcblk1rpmb 179:32 0 128K 0 disk
It mounts just fine. I noted that the date of directory xxx is Dec 31 1969 and I can't change the mode bits. As requested, I did df -hTa /media/sd
root@bbbtest:/media# df -hTa /media/sd
Filesystem Type Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/mmcblk1p1 ext4 1.8G 730M 931M 44% /
and df -hTa /media which gave the same result.
However I also created directory /mnt/sd and had no difficulty mounting the partition there which solved my problem practically. I am still curious as to why /media/sd did not work
root@bbbtest:/media# mount -L BKUPFS
root@bbbtest:/media# lsblk
NAME MAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT
mmcblk0 179:0 0 58G 0 disk
├─mmcblk0p1 179:1 0 2G 0 part /usr
└─mmcblk0p2 179:2 0 56G 0 part /mnt/sd
mmcblk1 179:8 0 1.8G 0 disk
└─mmcblk1p1 179:9 0 1.8G 0 part /
mmcblk1boot0 179:16 0 1M 1 disk
mmcblk1boot1 179:24 0 1M 1 disk
mmcblk1rpmb 179:32 0 128K 0 disk
As requested, I did
root@bbbprod:~# dmesg -C
root@bbbprod:~# mount -vvv /dev/mmcblk0p2 /media/sd
mount: /dev/mmcblk0p2 mounted on /media/sd.
Then checked with mount which showed that it was not really mounted and did dmesg.
root@bbbprod:~# dmesg
root@bbbprod:~#
mount
mount
asked Dec 30 '18 at 17:05
Yves
162
New contributor
Yves is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked Dec 30 '18 at 17:05
Yves
162
New contributor
Yves is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited Dec 31 '18 at 23:02
asked Dec 30 '18 at 17:05
Yves
162
New contributor
Yves is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked Dec 30 '18 at 17:05
Yves
162
asked Dec 30 '18 at 17:05
Yves
162
162
New contributor
Yves is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Yves is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Yves is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Is it actually not mounted or doeslsblkjust do not show the mount? Use the command ``mount` ordf -hTa /media/sdto verify if it is mounted. Please also add the output ofdf -hTa /mediato your question by editing the question.
– Thomas
Dec 30 '18 at 17:21
Thanks Thomas. I did as you asked. The partition was not mounted. It mounted fine on /root/xxx and /mnt/sd. I am really curious as to what was special about /media/sd.
– Yves
Dec 30 '18 at 20:52
Hm, strange. Is there anything in the kernel log? Dodmesg -C, thenmount -vvv /dev/mmcblk0p2 /media/sdand thendmesg. This should give you an output and add that to your question. A complete output ofmountwould also be helpful.
– Thomas
Dec 31 '18 at 10:30
Still not mounting. Strange that it mounted fine on /root/xxx and /mnt/sd. I opted to mount it on /mnt/sd and solved the problem but it is really strange.
– Yves
Dec 31 '18 at 23:04
add a comment |
Is it actually not mounted or doeslsblkjust do not show the mount? Use the command ``mount` ordf -hTa /media/sdto verify if it is mounted. Please also add the output ofdf -hTa /mediato your question by editing the question.
– Thomas
Dec 30 '18 at 17:21
Thanks Thomas. I did as you asked. The partition was not mounted. It mounted fine on /root/xxx and /mnt/sd. I am really curious as to what was special about /media/sd.
– Yves
Dec 30 '18 at 20:52
Hm, strange. Is there anything in the kernel log? Dodmesg -C, thenmount -vvv /dev/mmcblk0p2 /media/sdand thendmesg. This should give you an output and add that to your question. A complete output ofmountwould also be helpful.
– Thomas
Dec 31 '18 at 10:30
Still not mounting. Strange that it mounted fine on /root/xxx and /mnt/sd. I opted to mount it on /mnt/sd and solved the problem but it is really strange.
– Yves
Dec 31 '18 at 23:04
Is it actually not mounted or does
lsblk just do not show the mount? Use the command ``mount` or df -hTa /media/sd to verify if it is mounted. Please also add the output of df -hTa /media to your question by editing the question.– Thomas
Dec 30 '18 at 17:21
Is it actually not mounted or does
lsblk just do not show the mount? Use the command ``mount` or df -hTa /media/sd to verify if it is mounted. Please also add the output of df -hTa /media to your question by editing the question.– Thomas
Dec 30 '18 at 17:21
Thanks Thomas. I did as you asked. The partition was not mounted. It mounted fine on /root/xxx and /mnt/sd. I am really curious as to what was special about /media/sd.
– Yves
Dec 30 '18 at 20:52
Thanks Thomas. I did as you asked. The partition was not mounted. It mounted fine on /root/xxx and /mnt/sd. I am really curious as to what was special about /media/sd.
– Yves
Dec 30 '18 at 20:52
Hm, strange. Is there anything in the kernel log? Do
dmesg -C, then mount -vvv /dev/mmcblk0p2 /media/sdand then dmesg. This should give you an output and add that to your question. A complete output of mount would also be helpful.– Thomas
Dec 31 '18 at 10:30
Hm, strange. Is there anything in the kernel log? Do
dmesg -C, then mount -vvv /dev/mmcblk0p2 /media/sdand then dmesg. This should give you an output and add that to your question. A complete output of mount would also be helpful.– Thomas
Dec 31 '18 at 10:30
Still not mounting. Strange that it mounted fine on /root/xxx and /mnt/sd. I opted to mount it on /mnt/sd and solved the problem but it is really strange.
– Yves
Dec 31 '18 at 23:04
Still not mounting. Strange that it mounted fine on /root/xxx and /mnt/sd. I opted to mount it on /mnt/sd and solved the problem but it is really strange.
– Yves
Dec 31 '18 at 23:04
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "89"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Yves is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
draft saved
draft discarded
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1105638%2fmount-works-on-some-directory-but-not-on-other%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Yves is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
draft saved
draft discarded
Yves is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Yves is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Yves is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Ask Ubuntu!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
draft saved
draft discarded
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1105638%2fmount-works-on-some-directory-but-not-on-other%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Is it actually not mounted or does
lsblkjust do not show the mount? Use the command ``mount` ordf -hTa /media/sdto verify if it is mounted. Please also add the output ofdf -hTa /mediato your question by editing the question.– Thomas
Dec 30 '18 at 17:21
Thanks Thomas. I did as you asked. The partition was not mounted. It mounted fine on /root/xxx and /mnt/sd. I am really curious as to what was special about /media/sd.
– Yves
Dec 30 '18 at 20:52
Hm, strange. Is there anything in the kernel log? Do
dmesg -C, thenmount -vvv /dev/mmcblk0p2 /media/sdand thendmesg. This should give you an output and add that to your question. A complete output ofmountwould also be helpful.– Thomas
Dec 31 '18 at 10:30
Still not mounting. Strange that it mounted fine on /root/xxx and /mnt/sd. I opted to mount it on /mnt/sd and solved the problem but it is really strange.
– Yves
Dec 31 '18 at 23:04