Why am I getting “Command 'deb' not found”?












78















I have come across several installation instructions that include the command deb. But it appears that this command is not available on my installation.



Where can I get this command? Is there a work-around?










share|improve this question




















  • 3





    Please accept an answer to questions where you have a good answer, to show that you like an answer and it helped you the most. You can do so with the checkmark to the left.

    – hexafraction
    Dec 26 '12 at 23:20






  • 1





    I'm embarassed that I didn't realize the instructions I was reading weren't showing me something to type at the command line, it was showing me a line to put in a file. I'm glad you asked this question!

    – Tyler Collier
    Oct 13 '13 at 5:40
















78















I have come across several installation instructions that include the command deb. But it appears that this command is not available on my installation.



Where can I get this command? Is there a work-around?










share|improve this question




















  • 3





    Please accept an answer to questions where you have a good answer, to show that you like an answer and it helped you the most. You can do so with the checkmark to the left.

    – hexafraction
    Dec 26 '12 at 23:20






  • 1





    I'm embarassed that I didn't realize the instructions I was reading weren't showing me something to type at the command line, it was showing me a line to put in a file. I'm glad you asked this question!

    – Tyler Collier
    Oct 13 '13 at 5:40














78












78








78


19






I have come across several installation instructions that include the command deb. But it appears that this command is not available on my installation.



Where can I get this command? Is there a work-around?










share|improve this question
















I have come across several installation instructions that include the command deb. But it appears that this command is not available on my installation.



Where can I get this command? Is there a work-around?







repository deb






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Dec 27 '12 at 23:09









Eric Carvalho

41.7k17115147




41.7k17115147










asked Dec 26 '12 at 22:54









Kevin BurtonKevin Burton

514154




514154








  • 3





    Please accept an answer to questions where you have a good answer, to show that you like an answer and it helped you the most. You can do so with the checkmark to the left.

    – hexafraction
    Dec 26 '12 at 23:20






  • 1





    I'm embarassed that I didn't realize the instructions I was reading weren't showing me something to type at the command line, it was showing me a line to put in a file. I'm glad you asked this question!

    – Tyler Collier
    Oct 13 '13 at 5:40














  • 3





    Please accept an answer to questions where you have a good answer, to show that you like an answer and it helped you the most. You can do so with the checkmark to the left.

    – hexafraction
    Dec 26 '12 at 23:20






  • 1





    I'm embarassed that I didn't realize the instructions I was reading weren't showing me something to type at the command line, it was showing me a line to put in a file. I'm glad you asked this question!

    – Tyler Collier
    Oct 13 '13 at 5:40








3




3





Please accept an answer to questions where you have a good answer, to show that you like an answer and it helped you the most. You can do so with the checkmark to the left.

– hexafraction
Dec 26 '12 at 23:20





Please accept an answer to questions where you have a good answer, to show that you like an answer and it helped you the most. You can do so with the checkmark to the left.

– hexafraction
Dec 26 '12 at 23:20




1




1





I'm embarassed that I didn't realize the instructions I was reading weren't showing me something to type at the command line, it was showing me a line to put in a file. I'm glad you asked this question!

– Tyler Collier
Oct 13 '13 at 5:40





I'm embarassed that I didn't realize the instructions I was reading weren't showing me something to type at the command line, it was showing me a line to put in a file. I'm glad you asked this question!

– Tyler Collier
Oct 13 '13 at 5:40










5 Answers
5






active

oldest

votes


















81














'deb' is not a command. It is used in /etc/apt/sources.list file to indicate a Debian software repository.



From Ubuntu Manpage - sources.list:




The source list is designed to support any number of active sources
and a variety of source media. The file lists one source per line,
with the most preferred source listed first. The format of each line
is: type uri args. The first item, type determines the format for
args. uri is a Universal Resource Identifier (URI), which is a
superset of the more specific and well-known Universal Resource
Locator, or URL.



The deb type describes a typical two-level Debian archive,
distribution/component. The format for a sources.list entry using the
deb and deb-src types is:



deb [ options ] uri distribution [component1] [component2] [...]


The URI for the deb type must specify the base of the Debian
distribution, from which APT will find the information it needs.
distribution can specify an exact path, in which case the components
must be omitted and distribution must end with a slash (/). This is
useful for when the case only a particular sub-section of the archive
denoted by the URI is of interest. If distribution does not specify an
exact path, at least one component must be present.




So, if I have deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ quantal main restricted in sources.list it says I have a Debian archive which is based on "http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/", the distribution is "quantal" and the components are "main" and "restricted".






share|improve this answer





















  • 21





    And sources.list is in /etc/apt/ on 12.04.

    – Ahmed Fasih
    Dec 4 '13 at 15:36






  • 2





    Can be useful if you say that "deb" lines are instructions added to Aptitude source lists. That would eliminate the amount of confusion this whole issue creates.

    – Shahriyar Imanov
    Jan 27 '14 at 10:08



















14














Like the answer by @Eric Carvalho deb is not command line If you have deb then url like this:



deb http://download.virtualbox.org/virtualbox/debian trusty contrib 


Edit



Like commit of @muru, you need to create new file with the extension .list into /etc/apt/source.list.d/ folder:



Example:
I want to download Oracle virtualbox, create new file :



sudo gedit /etc/apt/sources.list.d/oracle-virtualbox-trusty.list 


Then copy and paste the line of deb into this file






share|improve this answer





















  • 1





    1. It's apt, not opt (though there is an opt) and 2. Never edit /etc/apt/sources.list to add a line unless it is an Ubuntu mirror/official repository. Create a new file in /etc/apt/sources.list.d with the extension .list with that line.

    – muru
    Sep 11 '14 at 16:02






  • 1





    @muru "Never edit /etc/apt/sources.list to add a line unless it is an Ubuntu mirror/official repository." Why? Sure, making .list files in /etc/apt/sources.list.d is what I do under these circumstances and is what I usually recommend. But I see no reason to insist manually added 3rd party software sources go in /etc/apt/sources.list.d. Some conffiles are when possible best not edited by the user (e.g., use /etc/profile.d over /etc/profile, arguably use /etc/sudoers.d over /etc/sudoers), but sources.list is often changed. (Even customized by Ubiquity to a regional mirror.)

    – Eliah Kagan
    Sep 12 '14 at 6:06













  • @EliahKagan when have you ever seen Ubiquity add a third-party repository (not mirror) to sources.list? Or for that matter, any official tool? sources.list.d is present for a reason. I will continue to insist that it be used for third-party repositories.

    – muru
    Sep 12 '14 at 7:41











  • @muru Sorry, I wasn't clear. I mentioned Ubiquity's behavior to point out /etc/apt/sources.list isn't one of the conffiles that one can leave alone so as to facilitate smoother upgrading--as that is often (perhaps usually) the motivation behind strong suggestions to prefer making files in X.d to editing X. I am not suggesting Ubiquity enables third-party repos in any way. You haven't explained what's special about such repos, though, so as to make it actually wrong (i.e., "Never edit...") to put them in sources.list.

    – Eliah Kagan
    Sep 12 '14 at 7:49











  • @EliahKagan There's nothing "actually wrong" in doing so, if that's your problem with the statement. "Never [do X]" doesn't always mean that doing X is wrong, it can and does mean that doing X is bad practice ("Never use GOTO."). Happy, now? Repeat: I will continue to insist that sources.list.d be used for third party repositories and sources.list only for mirrors and official repos, unless you can give me a clear, sound, reason as to why it is a good idea not to do so.

    – muru
    Sep 12 '14 at 8:05



















8














Deb isn't actually a command (I thought so too, at first) -- Assuming you are trying to download/install a deb, do this (for example):



wget http://whatever.com/whatever.deb



then dpkg -i whatever.deb



then run the commands:



sudo apt-get update





share|improve this answer





















  • 2





    100% relevant, and better than the best answer above. He's obviously trying to download/install a .deb

    – dylanh724
    Jul 17 '16 at 17:33



















8














deb is not a unix command. If you have a line like the following (source for docker):



deb https://apt.dockerproject.org/repo ubuntu-xenial main


it is a line that must be available in your ubuntu sources.list so that apt-get can find future packages from this new source.



However, it's not a good practice to edit the /etc/apt/sources.list file directly. Instead add the deb line as an entry to a new .list file inside the /etc/apt/sources.list.d/ directory. We will create a docker.list file like this:



echo "deb https://apt.dockerproject.org/repo ubuntu-xenial main" | sudo tee /etc/apt/sources.list.d/docker.list


Once done, remember to perform a sudo apt-get update and you should now be able to find new packages from this source easily.






share|improve this answer































    1














    This is not a CLI command.



    This is information about some Debian package repository (used also by Ubuntu).



    If you want to use this repository:




    1. Open the file /etc/apt/sources.list with administrator privileges.


    2. Add to this file a line with information about the repository starting with deb ...


    3. Save the file.



    4. Run this command:



      apt-get update




    Now you will be able to use this repository.






    share|improve this answer






















      protected by Community Sep 25 '18 at 9:38



      Thank you for your interest in this question.
      Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).



      Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?














      5 Answers
      5






      active

      oldest

      votes








      5 Answers
      5






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      81














      'deb' is not a command. It is used in /etc/apt/sources.list file to indicate a Debian software repository.



      From Ubuntu Manpage - sources.list:




      The source list is designed to support any number of active sources
      and a variety of source media. The file lists one source per line,
      with the most preferred source listed first. The format of each line
      is: type uri args. The first item, type determines the format for
      args. uri is a Universal Resource Identifier (URI), which is a
      superset of the more specific and well-known Universal Resource
      Locator, or URL.



      The deb type describes a typical two-level Debian archive,
      distribution/component. The format for a sources.list entry using the
      deb and deb-src types is:



      deb [ options ] uri distribution [component1] [component2] [...]


      The URI for the deb type must specify the base of the Debian
      distribution, from which APT will find the information it needs.
      distribution can specify an exact path, in which case the components
      must be omitted and distribution must end with a slash (/). This is
      useful for when the case only a particular sub-section of the archive
      denoted by the URI is of interest. If distribution does not specify an
      exact path, at least one component must be present.




      So, if I have deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ quantal main restricted in sources.list it says I have a Debian archive which is based on "http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/", the distribution is "quantal" and the components are "main" and "restricted".






      share|improve this answer





















      • 21





        And sources.list is in /etc/apt/ on 12.04.

        – Ahmed Fasih
        Dec 4 '13 at 15:36






      • 2





        Can be useful if you say that "deb" lines are instructions added to Aptitude source lists. That would eliminate the amount of confusion this whole issue creates.

        – Shahriyar Imanov
        Jan 27 '14 at 10:08
















      81














      'deb' is not a command. It is used in /etc/apt/sources.list file to indicate a Debian software repository.



      From Ubuntu Manpage - sources.list:




      The source list is designed to support any number of active sources
      and a variety of source media. The file lists one source per line,
      with the most preferred source listed first. The format of each line
      is: type uri args. The first item, type determines the format for
      args. uri is a Universal Resource Identifier (URI), which is a
      superset of the more specific and well-known Universal Resource
      Locator, or URL.



      The deb type describes a typical two-level Debian archive,
      distribution/component. The format for a sources.list entry using the
      deb and deb-src types is:



      deb [ options ] uri distribution [component1] [component2] [...]


      The URI for the deb type must specify the base of the Debian
      distribution, from which APT will find the information it needs.
      distribution can specify an exact path, in which case the components
      must be omitted and distribution must end with a slash (/). This is
      useful for when the case only a particular sub-section of the archive
      denoted by the URI is of interest. If distribution does not specify an
      exact path, at least one component must be present.




      So, if I have deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ quantal main restricted in sources.list it says I have a Debian archive which is based on "http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/", the distribution is "quantal" and the components are "main" and "restricted".






      share|improve this answer





















      • 21





        And sources.list is in /etc/apt/ on 12.04.

        – Ahmed Fasih
        Dec 4 '13 at 15:36






      • 2





        Can be useful if you say that "deb" lines are instructions added to Aptitude source lists. That would eliminate the amount of confusion this whole issue creates.

        – Shahriyar Imanov
        Jan 27 '14 at 10:08














      81












      81








      81







      'deb' is not a command. It is used in /etc/apt/sources.list file to indicate a Debian software repository.



      From Ubuntu Manpage - sources.list:




      The source list is designed to support any number of active sources
      and a variety of source media. The file lists one source per line,
      with the most preferred source listed first. The format of each line
      is: type uri args. The first item, type determines the format for
      args. uri is a Universal Resource Identifier (URI), which is a
      superset of the more specific and well-known Universal Resource
      Locator, or URL.



      The deb type describes a typical two-level Debian archive,
      distribution/component. The format for a sources.list entry using the
      deb and deb-src types is:



      deb [ options ] uri distribution [component1] [component2] [...]


      The URI for the deb type must specify the base of the Debian
      distribution, from which APT will find the information it needs.
      distribution can specify an exact path, in which case the components
      must be omitted and distribution must end with a slash (/). This is
      useful for when the case only a particular sub-section of the archive
      denoted by the URI is of interest. If distribution does not specify an
      exact path, at least one component must be present.




      So, if I have deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ quantal main restricted in sources.list it says I have a Debian archive which is based on "http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/", the distribution is "quantal" and the components are "main" and "restricted".






      share|improve this answer















      'deb' is not a command. It is used in /etc/apt/sources.list file to indicate a Debian software repository.



      From Ubuntu Manpage - sources.list:




      The source list is designed to support any number of active sources
      and a variety of source media. The file lists one source per line,
      with the most preferred source listed first. The format of each line
      is: type uri args. The first item, type determines the format for
      args. uri is a Universal Resource Identifier (URI), which is a
      superset of the more specific and well-known Universal Resource
      Locator, or URL.



      The deb type describes a typical two-level Debian archive,
      distribution/component. The format for a sources.list entry using the
      deb and deb-src types is:



      deb [ options ] uri distribution [component1] [component2] [...]


      The URI for the deb type must specify the base of the Debian
      distribution, from which APT will find the information it needs.
      distribution can specify an exact path, in which case the components
      must be omitted and distribution must end with a slash (/). This is
      useful for when the case only a particular sub-section of the archive
      denoted by the URI is of interest. If distribution does not specify an
      exact path, at least one component must be present.




      So, if I have deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ quantal main restricted in sources.list it says I have a Debian archive which is based on "http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/", the distribution is "quantal" and the components are "main" and "restricted".







      share|improve this answer














      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited 9 hours ago









      Shayan

      353418




      353418










      answered Dec 26 '12 at 23:08









      Eric CarvalhoEric Carvalho

      41.7k17115147




      41.7k17115147








      • 21





        And sources.list is in /etc/apt/ on 12.04.

        – Ahmed Fasih
        Dec 4 '13 at 15:36






      • 2





        Can be useful if you say that "deb" lines are instructions added to Aptitude source lists. That would eliminate the amount of confusion this whole issue creates.

        – Shahriyar Imanov
        Jan 27 '14 at 10:08














      • 21





        And sources.list is in /etc/apt/ on 12.04.

        – Ahmed Fasih
        Dec 4 '13 at 15:36






      • 2





        Can be useful if you say that "deb" lines are instructions added to Aptitude source lists. That would eliminate the amount of confusion this whole issue creates.

        – Shahriyar Imanov
        Jan 27 '14 at 10:08








      21




      21





      And sources.list is in /etc/apt/ on 12.04.

      – Ahmed Fasih
      Dec 4 '13 at 15:36





      And sources.list is in /etc/apt/ on 12.04.

      – Ahmed Fasih
      Dec 4 '13 at 15:36




      2




      2





      Can be useful if you say that "deb" lines are instructions added to Aptitude source lists. That would eliminate the amount of confusion this whole issue creates.

      – Shahriyar Imanov
      Jan 27 '14 at 10:08





      Can be useful if you say that "deb" lines are instructions added to Aptitude source lists. That would eliminate the amount of confusion this whole issue creates.

      – Shahriyar Imanov
      Jan 27 '14 at 10:08













      14














      Like the answer by @Eric Carvalho deb is not command line If you have deb then url like this:



      deb http://download.virtualbox.org/virtualbox/debian trusty contrib 


      Edit



      Like commit of @muru, you need to create new file with the extension .list into /etc/apt/source.list.d/ folder:



      Example:
      I want to download Oracle virtualbox, create new file :



      sudo gedit /etc/apt/sources.list.d/oracle-virtualbox-trusty.list 


      Then copy and paste the line of deb into this file






      share|improve this answer





















      • 1





        1. It's apt, not opt (though there is an opt) and 2. Never edit /etc/apt/sources.list to add a line unless it is an Ubuntu mirror/official repository. Create a new file in /etc/apt/sources.list.d with the extension .list with that line.

        – muru
        Sep 11 '14 at 16:02






      • 1





        @muru "Never edit /etc/apt/sources.list to add a line unless it is an Ubuntu mirror/official repository." Why? Sure, making .list files in /etc/apt/sources.list.d is what I do under these circumstances and is what I usually recommend. But I see no reason to insist manually added 3rd party software sources go in /etc/apt/sources.list.d. Some conffiles are when possible best not edited by the user (e.g., use /etc/profile.d over /etc/profile, arguably use /etc/sudoers.d over /etc/sudoers), but sources.list is often changed. (Even customized by Ubiquity to a regional mirror.)

        – Eliah Kagan
        Sep 12 '14 at 6:06













      • @EliahKagan when have you ever seen Ubiquity add a third-party repository (not mirror) to sources.list? Or for that matter, any official tool? sources.list.d is present for a reason. I will continue to insist that it be used for third-party repositories.

        – muru
        Sep 12 '14 at 7:41











      • @muru Sorry, I wasn't clear. I mentioned Ubiquity's behavior to point out /etc/apt/sources.list isn't one of the conffiles that one can leave alone so as to facilitate smoother upgrading--as that is often (perhaps usually) the motivation behind strong suggestions to prefer making files in X.d to editing X. I am not suggesting Ubiquity enables third-party repos in any way. You haven't explained what's special about such repos, though, so as to make it actually wrong (i.e., "Never edit...") to put them in sources.list.

        – Eliah Kagan
        Sep 12 '14 at 7:49











      • @EliahKagan There's nothing "actually wrong" in doing so, if that's your problem with the statement. "Never [do X]" doesn't always mean that doing X is wrong, it can and does mean that doing X is bad practice ("Never use GOTO."). Happy, now? Repeat: I will continue to insist that sources.list.d be used for third party repositories and sources.list only for mirrors and official repos, unless you can give me a clear, sound, reason as to why it is a good idea not to do so.

        – muru
        Sep 12 '14 at 8:05
















      14














      Like the answer by @Eric Carvalho deb is not command line If you have deb then url like this:



      deb http://download.virtualbox.org/virtualbox/debian trusty contrib 


      Edit



      Like commit of @muru, you need to create new file with the extension .list into /etc/apt/source.list.d/ folder:



      Example:
      I want to download Oracle virtualbox, create new file :



      sudo gedit /etc/apt/sources.list.d/oracle-virtualbox-trusty.list 


      Then copy and paste the line of deb into this file






      share|improve this answer





















      • 1





        1. It's apt, not opt (though there is an opt) and 2. Never edit /etc/apt/sources.list to add a line unless it is an Ubuntu mirror/official repository. Create a new file in /etc/apt/sources.list.d with the extension .list with that line.

        – muru
        Sep 11 '14 at 16:02






      • 1





        @muru "Never edit /etc/apt/sources.list to add a line unless it is an Ubuntu mirror/official repository." Why? Sure, making .list files in /etc/apt/sources.list.d is what I do under these circumstances and is what I usually recommend. But I see no reason to insist manually added 3rd party software sources go in /etc/apt/sources.list.d. Some conffiles are when possible best not edited by the user (e.g., use /etc/profile.d over /etc/profile, arguably use /etc/sudoers.d over /etc/sudoers), but sources.list is often changed. (Even customized by Ubiquity to a regional mirror.)

        – Eliah Kagan
        Sep 12 '14 at 6:06













      • @EliahKagan when have you ever seen Ubiquity add a third-party repository (not mirror) to sources.list? Or for that matter, any official tool? sources.list.d is present for a reason. I will continue to insist that it be used for third-party repositories.

        – muru
        Sep 12 '14 at 7:41











      • @muru Sorry, I wasn't clear. I mentioned Ubiquity's behavior to point out /etc/apt/sources.list isn't one of the conffiles that one can leave alone so as to facilitate smoother upgrading--as that is often (perhaps usually) the motivation behind strong suggestions to prefer making files in X.d to editing X. I am not suggesting Ubiquity enables third-party repos in any way. You haven't explained what's special about such repos, though, so as to make it actually wrong (i.e., "Never edit...") to put them in sources.list.

        – Eliah Kagan
        Sep 12 '14 at 7:49











      • @EliahKagan There's nothing "actually wrong" in doing so, if that's your problem with the statement. "Never [do X]" doesn't always mean that doing X is wrong, it can and does mean that doing X is bad practice ("Never use GOTO."). Happy, now? Repeat: I will continue to insist that sources.list.d be used for third party repositories and sources.list only for mirrors and official repos, unless you can give me a clear, sound, reason as to why it is a good idea not to do so.

        – muru
        Sep 12 '14 at 8:05














      14












      14








      14







      Like the answer by @Eric Carvalho deb is not command line If you have deb then url like this:



      deb http://download.virtualbox.org/virtualbox/debian trusty contrib 


      Edit



      Like commit of @muru, you need to create new file with the extension .list into /etc/apt/source.list.d/ folder:



      Example:
      I want to download Oracle virtualbox, create new file :



      sudo gedit /etc/apt/sources.list.d/oracle-virtualbox-trusty.list 


      Then copy and paste the line of deb into this file






      share|improve this answer















      Like the answer by @Eric Carvalho deb is not command line If you have deb then url like this:



      deb http://download.virtualbox.org/virtualbox/debian trusty contrib 


      Edit



      Like commit of @muru, you need to create new file with the extension .list into /etc/apt/source.list.d/ folder:



      Example:
      I want to download Oracle virtualbox, create new file :



      sudo gedit /etc/apt/sources.list.d/oracle-virtualbox-trusty.list 


      Then copy and paste the line of deb into this file







      share|improve this answer














      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited Aug 20 '18 at 20:54









      lgwilliams

      1033




      1033










      answered Sep 11 '14 at 14:36









      ahmed hamdyahmed hamdy

      53959




      53959








      • 1





        1. It's apt, not opt (though there is an opt) and 2. Never edit /etc/apt/sources.list to add a line unless it is an Ubuntu mirror/official repository. Create a new file in /etc/apt/sources.list.d with the extension .list with that line.

        – muru
        Sep 11 '14 at 16:02






      • 1





        @muru "Never edit /etc/apt/sources.list to add a line unless it is an Ubuntu mirror/official repository." Why? Sure, making .list files in /etc/apt/sources.list.d is what I do under these circumstances and is what I usually recommend. But I see no reason to insist manually added 3rd party software sources go in /etc/apt/sources.list.d. Some conffiles are when possible best not edited by the user (e.g., use /etc/profile.d over /etc/profile, arguably use /etc/sudoers.d over /etc/sudoers), but sources.list is often changed. (Even customized by Ubiquity to a regional mirror.)

        – Eliah Kagan
        Sep 12 '14 at 6:06













      • @EliahKagan when have you ever seen Ubiquity add a third-party repository (not mirror) to sources.list? Or for that matter, any official tool? sources.list.d is present for a reason. I will continue to insist that it be used for third-party repositories.

        – muru
        Sep 12 '14 at 7:41











      • @muru Sorry, I wasn't clear. I mentioned Ubiquity's behavior to point out /etc/apt/sources.list isn't one of the conffiles that one can leave alone so as to facilitate smoother upgrading--as that is often (perhaps usually) the motivation behind strong suggestions to prefer making files in X.d to editing X. I am not suggesting Ubiquity enables third-party repos in any way. You haven't explained what's special about such repos, though, so as to make it actually wrong (i.e., "Never edit...") to put them in sources.list.

        – Eliah Kagan
        Sep 12 '14 at 7:49











      • @EliahKagan There's nothing "actually wrong" in doing so, if that's your problem with the statement. "Never [do X]" doesn't always mean that doing X is wrong, it can and does mean that doing X is bad practice ("Never use GOTO."). Happy, now? Repeat: I will continue to insist that sources.list.d be used for third party repositories and sources.list only for mirrors and official repos, unless you can give me a clear, sound, reason as to why it is a good idea not to do so.

        – muru
        Sep 12 '14 at 8:05














      • 1





        1. It's apt, not opt (though there is an opt) and 2. Never edit /etc/apt/sources.list to add a line unless it is an Ubuntu mirror/official repository. Create a new file in /etc/apt/sources.list.d with the extension .list with that line.

        – muru
        Sep 11 '14 at 16:02






      • 1





        @muru "Never edit /etc/apt/sources.list to add a line unless it is an Ubuntu mirror/official repository." Why? Sure, making .list files in /etc/apt/sources.list.d is what I do under these circumstances and is what I usually recommend. But I see no reason to insist manually added 3rd party software sources go in /etc/apt/sources.list.d. Some conffiles are when possible best not edited by the user (e.g., use /etc/profile.d over /etc/profile, arguably use /etc/sudoers.d over /etc/sudoers), but sources.list is often changed. (Even customized by Ubiquity to a regional mirror.)

        – Eliah Kagan
        Sep 12 '14 at 6:06













      • @EliahKagan when have you ever seen Ubiquity add a third-party repository (not mirror) to sources.list? Or for that matter, any official tool? sources.list.d is present for a reason. I will continue to insist that it be used for third-party repositories.

        – muru
        Sep 12 '14 at 7:41











      • @muru Sorry, I wasn't clear. I mentioned Ubiquity's behavior to point out /etc/apt/sources.list isn't one of the conffiles that one can leave alone so as to facilitate smoother upgrading--as that is often (perhaps usually) the motivation behind strong suggestions to prefer making files in X.d to editing X. I am not suggesting Ubiquity enables third-party repos in any way. You haven't explained what's special about such repos, though, so as to make it actually wrong (i.e., "Never edit...") to put them in sources.list.

        – Eliah Kagan
        Sep 12 '14 at 7:49











      • @EliahKagan There's nothing "actually wrong" in doing so, if that's your problem with the statement. "Never [do X]" doesn't always mean that doing X is wrong, it can and does mean that doing X is bad practice ("Never use GOTO."). Happy, now? Repeat: I will continue to insist that sources.list.d be used for third party repositories and sources.list only for mirrors and official repos, unless you can give me a clear, sound, reason as to why it is a good idea not to do so.

        – muru
        Sep 12 '14 at 8:05








      1




      1





      1. It's apt, not opt (though there is an opt) and 2. Never edit /etc/apt/sources.list to add a line unless it is an Ubuntu mirror/official repository. Create a new file in /etc/apt/sources.list.d with the extension .list with that line.

      – muru
      Sep 11 '14 at 16:02





      1. It's apt, not opt (though there is an opt) and 2. Never edit /etc/apt/sources.list to add a line unless it is an Ubuntu mirror/official repository. Create a new file in /etc/apt/sources.list.d with the extension .list with that line.

      – muru
      Sep 11 '14 at 16:02




      1




      1





      @muru "Never edit /etc/apt/sources.list to add a line unless it is an Ubuntu mirror/official repository." Why? Sure, making .list files in /etc/apt/sources.list.d is what I do under these circumstances and is what I usually recommend. But I see no reason to insist manually added 3rd party software sources go in /etc/apt/sources.list.d. Some conffiles are when possible best not edited by the user (e.g., use /etc/profile.d over /etc/profile, arguably use /etc/sudoers.d over /etc/sudoers), but sources.list is often changed. (Even customized by Ubiquity to a regional mirror.)

      – Eliah Kagan
      Sep 12 '14 at 6:06







      @muru "Never edit /etc/apt/sources.list to add a line unless it is an Ubuntu mirror/official repository." Why? Sure, making .list files in /etc/apt/sources.list.d is what I do under these circumstances and is what I usually recommend. But I see no reason to insist manually added 3rd party software sources go in /etc/apt/sources.list.d. Some conffiles are when possible best not edited by the user (e.g., use /etc/profile.d over /etc/profile, arguably use /etc/sudoers.d over /etc/sudoers), but sources.list is often changed. (Even customized by Ubiquity to a regional mirror.)

      – Eliah Kagan
      Sep 12 '14 at 6:06















      @EliahKagan when have you ever seen Ubiquity add a third-party repository (not mirror) to sources.list? Or for that matter, any official tool? sources.list.d is present for a reason. I will continue to insist that it be used for third-party repositories.

      – muru
      Sep 12 '14 at 7:41





      @EliahKagan when have you ever seen Ubiquity add a third-party repository (not mirror) to sources.list? Or for that matter, any official tool? sources.list.d is present for a reason. I will continue to insist that it be used for third-party repositories.

      – muru
      Sep 12 '14 at 7:41













      @muru Sorry, I wasn't clear. I mentioned Ubiquity's behavior to point out /etc/apt/sources.list isn't one of the conffiles that one can leave alone so as to facilitate smoother upgrading--as that is often (perhaps usually) the motivation behind strong suggestions to prefer making files in X.d to editing X. I am not suggesting Ubiquity enables third-party repos in any way. You haven't explained what's special about such repos, though, so as to make it actually wrong (i.e., "Never edit...") to put them in sources.list.

      – Eliah Kagan
      Sep 12 '14 at 7:49





      @muru Sorry, I wasn't clear. I mentioned Ubiquity's behavior to point out /etc/apt/sources.list isn't one of the conffiles that one can leave alone so as to facilitate smoother upgrading--as that is often (perhaps usually) the motivation behind strong suggestions to prefer making files in X.d to editing X. I am not suggesting Ubiquity enables third-party repos in any way. You haven't explained what's special about such repos, though, so as to make it actually wrong (i.e., "Never edit...") to put them in sources.list.

      – Eliah Kagan
      Sep 12 '14 at 7:49













      @EliahKagan There's nothing "actually wrong" in doing so, if that's your problem with the statement. "Never [do X]" doesn't always mean that doing X is wrong, it can and does mean that doing X is bad practice ("Never use GOTO."). Happy, now? Repeat: I will continue to insist that sources.list.d be used for third party repositories and sources.list only for mirrors and official repos, unless you can give me a clear, sound, reason as to why it is a good idea not to do so.

      – muru
      Sep 12 '14 at 8:05





      @EliahKagan There's nothing "actually wrong" in doing so, if that's your problem with the statement. "Never [do X]" doesn't always mean that doing X is wrong, it can and does mean that doing X is bad practice ("Never use GOTO."). Happy, now? Repeat: I will continue to insist that sources.list.d be used for third party repositories and sources.list only for mirrors and official repos, unless you can give me a clear, sound, reason as to why it is a good idea not to do so.

      – muru
      Sep 12 '14 at 8:05











      8














      Deb isn't actually a command (I thought so too, at first) -- Assuming you are trying to download/install a deb, do this (for example):



      wget http://whatever.com/whatever.deb



      then dpkg -i whatever.deb



      then run the commands:



      sudo apt-get update





      share|improve this answer





















      • 2





        100% relevant, and better than the best answer above. He's obviously trying to download/install a .deb

        – dylanh724
        Jul 17 '16 at 17:33
















      8














      Deb isn't actually a command (I thought so too, at first) -- Assuming you are trying to download/install a deb, do this (for example):



      wget http://whatever.com/whatever.deb



      then dpkg -i whatever.deb



      then run the commands:



      sudo apt-get update





      share|improve this answer





















      • 2





        100% relevant, and better than the best answer above. He's obviously trying to download/install a .deb

        – dylanh724
        Jul 17 '16 at 17:33














      8












      8








      8







      Deb isn't actually a command (I thought so too, at first) -- Assuming you are trying to download/install a deb, do this (for example):



      wget http://whatever.com/whatever.deb



      then dpkg -i whatever.deb



      then run the commands:



      sudo apt-get update





      share|improve this answer















      Deb isn't actually a command (I thought so too, at first) -- Assuming you are trying to download/install a deb, do this (for example):



      wget http://whatever.com/whatever.deb



      then dpkg -i whatever.deb



      then run the commands:



      sudo apt-get update






      share|improve this answer














      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited Jul 17 '16 at 17:28

























      answered Jul 16 '16 at 16:11









      dylanh724dylanh724

      19715




      19715








      • 2





        100% relevant, and better than the best answer above. He's obviously trying to download/install a .deb

        – dylanh724
        Jul 17 '16 at 17:33














      • 2





        100% relevant, and better than the best answer above. He's obviously trying to download/install a .deb

        – dylanh724
        Jul 17 '16 at 17:33








      2




      2





      100% relevant, and better than the best answer above. He's obviously trying to download/install a .deb

      – dylanh724
      Jul 17 '16 at 17:33





      100% relevant, and better than the best answer above. He's obviously trying to download/install a .deb

      – dylanh724
      Jul 17 '16 at 17:33











      8














      deb is not a unix command. If you have a line like the following (source for docker):



      deb https://apt.dockerproject.org/repo ubuntu-xenial main


      it is a line that must be available in your ubuntu sources.list so that apt-get can find future packages from this new source.



      However, it's not a good practice to edit the /etc/apt/sources.list file directly. Instead add the deb line as an entry to a new .list file inside the /etc/apt/sources.list.d/ directory. We will create a docker.list file like this:



      echo "deb https://apt.dockerproject.org/repo ubuntu-xenial main" | sudo tee /etc/apt/sources.list.d/docker.list


      Once done, remember to perform a sudo apt-get update and you should now be able to find new packages from this source easily.






      share|improve this answer




























        8














        deb is not a unix command. If you have a line like the following (source for docker):



        deb https://apt.dockerproject.org/repo ubuntu-xenial main


        it is a line that must be available in your ubuntu sources.list so that apt-get can find future packages from this new source.



        However, it's not a good practice to edit the /etc/apt/sources.list file directly. Instead add the deb line as an entry to a new .list file inside the /etc/apt/sources.list.d/ directory. We will create a docker.list file like this:



        echo "deb https://apt.dockerproject.org/repo ubuntu-xenial main" | sudo tee /etc/apt/sources.list.d/docker.list


        Once done, remember to perform a sudo apt-get update and you should now be able to find new packages from this source easily.






        share|improve this answer


























          8












          8








          8







          deb is not a unix command. If you have a line like the following (source for docker):



          deb https://apt.dockerproject.org/repo ubuntu-xenial main


          it is a line that must be available in your ubuntu sources.list so that apt-get can find future packages from this new source.



          However, it's not a good practice to edit the /etc/apt/sources.list file directly. Instead add the deb line as an entry to a new .list file inside the /etc/apt/sources.list.d/ directory. We will create a docker.list file like this:



          echo "deb https://apt.dockerproject.org/repo ubuntu-xenial main" | sudo tee /etc/apt/sources.list.d/docker.list


          Once done, remember to perform a sudo apt-get update and you should now be able to find new packages from this source easily.






          share|improve this answer













          deb is not a unix command. If you have a line like the following (source for docker):



          deb https://apt.dockerproject.org/repo ubuntu-xenial main


          it is a line that must be available in your ubuntu sources.list so that apt-get can find future packages from this new source.



          However, it's not a good practice to edit the /etc/apt/sources.list file directly. Instead add the deb line as an entry to a new .list file inside the /etc/apt/sources.list.d/ directory. We will create a docker.list file like this:



          echo "deb https://apt.dockerproject.org/repo ubuntu-xenial main" | sudo tee /etc/apt/sources.list.d/docker.list


          Once done, remember to perform a sudo apt-get update and you should now be able to find new packages from this source easily.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Dec 15 '16 at 2:58









          Syed Rakib Al HasanSyed Rakib Al Hasan

          393312




          393312























              1














              This is not a CLI command.



              This is information about some Debian package repository (used also by Ubuntu).



              If you want to use this repository:




              1. Open the file /etc/apt/sources.list with administrator privileges.


              2. Add to this file a line with information about the repository starting with deb ...


              3. Save the file.



              4. Run this command:



                apt-get update




              Now you will be able to use this repository.






              share|improve this answer




























                1














                This is not a CLI command.



                This is information about some Debian package repository (used also by Ubuntu).



                If you want to use this repository:




                1. Open the file /etc/apt/sources.list with administrator privileges.


                2. Add to this file a line with information about the repository starting with deb ...


                3. Save the file.



                4. Run this command:



                  apt-get update




                Now you will be able to use this repository.






                share|improve this answer


























                  1












                  1








                  1







                  This is not a CLI command.



                  This is information about some Debian package repository (used also by Ubuntu).



                  If you want to use this repository:




                  1. Open the file /etc/apt/sources.list with administrator privileges.


                  2. Add to this file a line with information about the repository starting with deb ...


                  3. Save the file.



                  4. Run this command:



                    apt-get update




                  Now you will be able to use this repository.






                  share|improve this answer













                  This is not a CLI command.



                  This is information about some Debian package repository (used also by Ubuntu).



                  If you want to use this repository:




                  1. Open the file /etc/apt/sources.list with administrator privileges.


                  2. Add to this file a line with information about the repository starting with deb ...


                  3. Save the file.



                  4. Run this command:



                    apt-get update




                  Now you will be able to use this repository.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered Sep 4 '18 at 10:23









                  simhumilecosimhumileco

                  180110




                  180110

















                      protected by Community Sep 25 '18 at 9:38



                      Thank you for your interest in this question.
                      Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).



                      Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?



                      Popular posts from this blog

                      How did Captain America manage to do this?

                      迪纳利

                      南乌拉尔铁路局