Confusion between clamscan and clamdscan
If i am running clamscan -v under clamav-0.99.1 package, it is showing
----------- SCAN SUMMARY -----------
Known viruses: 4297948
Engine version: 0.99.1
Scanned directories: 1
Scanned files: 39
Infected files: 0
Data scanned: 5.25 MB
Data read: 2.37 MB (ratio 2.22:1)
Time: 6.649 sec (0 m 6 s)
If i am running clamdscan -v under clamav-0.99.1 package, it is showing
----------- SCAN SUMMARY -----------
Infected files: 52
Time: 1.936 sec (0 m 1 s)
If i run particularly under clamav-0.99.1/test directory, clamscan -v, it is showing
----------- SCAN SUMMARY -----------
Known viruses: 4297948
Engine version: 0.99.1
Scanned directories: 1
Scanned files: 52
Infected files: 48
Data scanned: 14.52 MB
Data read: 6.94 MB (ratio 2.09:1)
Time: 8.117 sec (0 m 8 s)
And in clamdscan -v, it is showing
----------- SCAN SUMMARY -----------
Infected files: 52
Time: 1.184 sec (0 m 1 s)
Why is this difference?? Does running from super directory and particular directory matters??
Why clamscan -v is showing
Scanned files: 52
Infected files: 48
while clamdscan -v always showing
Infected files: 52
??
14.04 clamav
edited Apr 12 '16 at 12:49
bhordupur
32838
asked Apr 12 '16 at 11:37
VannsVanns
681213
add a comment |
If i am running clamscan -v under clamav-0.99.1 package, it is showing
----------- SCAN SUMMARY -----------
Known viruses: 4297948
Engine version: 0.99.1
Scanned directories: 1
Scanned files: 39
Infected files: 0
Data scanned: 5.25 MB
Data read: 2.37 MB (ratio 2.22:1)
Time: 6.649 sec (0 m 6 s)
If i am running clamdscan -v under clamav-0.99.1 package, it is showing
----------- SCAN SUMMARY -----------
Infected files: 52
Time: 1.936 sec (0 m 1 s)
If i run particularly under clamav-0.99.1/test directory, clamscan -v, it is showing
----------- SCAN SUMMARY -----------
Known viruses: 4297948
Engine version: 0.99.1
Scanned directories: 1
Scanned files: 52
Infected files: 48
Data scanned: 14.52 MB
Data read: 6.94 MB (ratio 2.09:1)
Time: 8.117 sec (0 m 8 s)
And in clamdscan -v, it is showing
----------- SCAN SUMMARY -----------
Infected files: 52
Time: 1.184 sec (0 m 1 s)
Why is this difference?? Does running from super directory and particular directory matters??
Why clamscan -v is showing
Scanned files: 52
Infected files: 48
while clamdscan -v always showing
Infected files: 52
??
14.04 clamav
edited Apr 12 '16 at 12:49
bhordupur
32838
asked Apr 12 '16 at 11:37
VannsVanns
681213
As far as I know clamdscan works like as a replacement of clamscan.You should not be worried about it .It does not matter actually what directory it is. If you ask people which one they use I would say clamscan.
– bhordupur
Apr 12 '16 at 12:22
1
One of most important thing is that clamdscan ignores most of the command line options of clamscan, therefore I doubt that it does not do an accurate scan.This is why, I would conclude you see an untrustful output from clamdscan in your result.
– bhordupur
Apr 12 '16 at 12:40
add a comment |
If i am running clamscan -v under clamav-0.99.1 package, it is showing
----------- SCAN SUMMARY -----------
Known viruses: 4297948
Engine version: 0.99.1
Scanned directories: 1
Scanned files: 39
Infected files: 0
Data scanned: 5.25 MB
Data read: 2.37 MB (ratio 2.22:1)
Time: 6.649 sec (0 m 6 s)
If i am running clamdscan -v under clamav-0.99.1 package, it is showing
----------- SCAN SUMMARY -----------
Infected files: 52
Time: 1.936 sec (0 m 1 s)
If i run particularly under clamav-0.99.1/test directory, clamscan -v, it is showing
----------- SCAN SUMMARY -----------
Known viruses: 4297948
Engine version: 0.99.1
Scanned directories: 1
Scanned files: 52
Infected files: 48
Data scanned: 14.52 MB
Data read: 6.94 MB (ratio 2.09:1)
Time: 8.117 sec (0 m 8 s)
And in clamdscan -v, it is showing
----------- SCAN SUMMARY -----------
Infected files: 52
Time: 1.184 sec (0 m 1 s)
Why is this difference?? Does running from super directory and particular directory matters??
Why clamscan -v is showing
Scanned files: 52
Infected files: 48
while clamdscan -v always showing
Infected files: 52
??
14.04 clamav
edited Apr 12 '16 at 12:49
bhordupur
32838
asked Apr 12 '16 at 11:37
VannsVanns
681213
If i am running clamscan -v under clamav-0.99.1 package, it is showing
----------- SCAN SUMMARY -----------
Known viruses: 4297948
Engine version: 0.99.1
Scanned directories: 1
Scanned files: 39
Infected files: 0
Data scanned: 5.25 MB
Data read: 2.37 MB (ratio 2.22:1)
Time: 6.649 sec (0 m 6 s)
If i am running clamdscan -v under clamav-0.99.1 package, it is showing
----------- SCAN SUMMARY -----------
Infected files: 52
Time: 1.936 sec (0 m 1 s)
If i run particularly under clamav-0.99.1/test directory, clamscan -v, it is showing
----------- SCAN SUMMARY -----------
Known viruses: 4297948
Engine version: 0.99.1
Scanned directories: 1
Scanned files: 52
Infected files: 48
Data scanned: 14.52 MB
Data read: 6.94 MB (ratio 2.09:1)
Time: 8.117 sec (0 m 8 s)
And in clamdscan -v, it is showing
----------- SCAN SUMMARY -----------
Infected files: 52
Time: 1.184 sec (0 m 1 s)
Why is this difference?? Does running from super directory and particular directory matters??
Why clamscan -v is showing
Scanned files: 52
Infected files: 48
while clamdscan -v always showing
Infected files: 52
??
14.04 clamav
14.04 clamav
edited Apr 12 '16 at 12:49
bhordupur
32838
asked Apr 12 '16 at 11:37
VannsVanns
681213
edited Apr 12 '16 at 12:49
bhordupur
32838
asked Apr 12 '16 at 11:37
VannsVanns
681213
edited Apr 12 '16 at 12:49
bhordupur
32838
edited Apr 12 '16 at 12:49
bhordupur
32838
edited Apr 12 '16 at 12:49
bhordupur
32838
32838
asked Apr 12 '16 at 11:37
VannsVanns
681213
asked Apr 12 '16 at 11:37
VannsVanns
681213
asked Apr 12 '16 at 11:37
VannsVanns
681213
681213
As far as I know clamdscan works like as a replacement of clamscan.You should not be worried about it .It does not matter actually what directory it is. If you ask people which one they use I would say clamscan.
– bhordupur
Apr 12 '16 at 12:22
1
One of most important thing is that clamdscan ignores most of the command line options of clamscan, therefore I doubt that it does not do an accurate scan.This is why, I would conclude you see an untrustful output from clamdscan in your result.
– bhordupur
Apr 12 '16 at 12:40
add a comment |
As far as I know clamdscan works like as a replacement of clamscan.You should not be worried about it .It does not matter actually what directory it is. If you ask people which one they use I would say clamscan.
– bhordupur
Apr 12 '16 at 12:22
1
One of most important thing is that clamdscan ignores most of the command line options of clamscan, therefore I doubt that it does not do an accurate scan.This is why, I would conclude you see an untrustful output from clamdscan in your result.
– bhordupur
Apr 12 '16 at 12:40
As far as I know clamdscan works like as a replacement of clamscan.You should not be worried about it .It does not matter actually what directory it is. If you ask people which one they use I would say clamscan.
– bhordupur
Apr 12 '16 at 12:22
As far as I know clamdscan works like as a replacement of clamscan.You should not be worried about it .It does not matter actually what directory it is. If you ask people which one they use I would say clamscan.
– bhordupur
Apr 12 '16 at 12:22
1
1
One of most important thing is that clamdscan ignores most of the command line options of clamscan, therefore I doubt that it does not do an accurate scan.This is why, I would conclude you see an untrustful output from clamdscan in your result.
– bhordupur
Apr 12 '16 at 12:40
One of most important thing is that clamdscan ignores most of the command line options of clamscan, therefore I doubt that it does not do an accurate scan.This is why, I would conclude you see an untrustful output from clamdscan in your result.
– bhordupur
Apr 12 '16 at 12:40
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
clamdscan is configured in /etc/clamav/clamd.conf. It allows faster scan by using parallelization with --multiscan which is using more resources, of course.
answered Mar 17 at 16:28
Karl RichterKarl Richter
2,49483569
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "89"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f756565%2fconfusion-between-clamscan-and-clamdscan%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
clamdscan is configured in /etc/clamav/clamd.conf. It allows faster scan by using parallelization with --multiscan which is using more resources, of course.
answered Mar 17 at 16:28
Karl RichterKarl Richter
2,49483569
add a comment |
clamdscan is configured in /etc/clamav/clamd.conf. It allows faster scan by using parallelization with --multiscan which is using more resources, of course.
answered Mar 17 at 16:28
Karl RichterKarl Richter
2,49483569
add a comment |
clamdscan is configured in /etc/clamav/clamd.conf. It allows faster scan by using parallelization with --multiscan which is using more resources, of course.
answered Mar 17 at 16:28
Karl RichterKarl Richter
2,49483569
clamdscan is configured in /etc/clamav/clamd.conf. It allows faster scan by using parallelization with --multiscan which is using more resources, of course.
answered Mar 17 at 16:28
Karl RichterKarl Richter
2,49483569
answered Mar 17 at 16:28
Karl RichterKarl Richter
2,49483569
answered Mar 17 at 16:28
Karl RichterKarl Richter
2,49483569
answered Mar 17 at 16:28
Karl RichterKarl Richter
2,49483569
2,49483569
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Ask Ubuntu!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f756565%2fconfusion-between-clamscan-and-clamdscan%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
As far as I know clamdscan works like as a replacement of clamscan.You should not be worried about it .It does not matter actually what directory it is. If you ask people which one they use I would say clamscan.
– bhordupur
Apr 12 '16 at 12:22
1
One of most important thing is that clamdscan ignores most of the command line options of clamscan, therefore I doubt that it does not do an accurate scan.This is why, I would conclude you see an untrustful output from clamdscan in your result.
– bhordupur
Apr 12 '16 at 12:40