Was “Congress” used to refer to an entity before the Constitution?












1















According to Merriam-Webster, a definition of Congress is
"1a: the act or action of coming together and meeting". The first known use of the word is "1528, in the meaning defined at sense 1a" and the etymology of the word is as follows:




Latin congressus, from congredi to come together, from com- + gradi to go




The first use of the word "Congress" referred to "The act or action of coming together or meeting" while the current use of the word seems to be preferential towards the idea that "Congress" is an "entity" rather than an "action" between two parties such as "The House Of Representatives" and the "Senate" which would in effect form the "Congress".



My question is, at the time of its use within the Constitution of The United States Of America would the word "Congress" be correctly defined if it alluded to anything other than a "meeting" or "the action of meeting"?



It is understood that there are multiple definitions for the term "congress", for the purpose of this post I am looking for the definition that was originally intended when written within the Constitution and if possible some supporting evidence such as context clues, other uses of the word during that time period, sentence structuring, or other evidence. One such example of a definition is the act of meeting where as later definitions seem to point to the word "congress" referring to an entity rather than an action.










share|improve this question

























  • Strange things happen to words when they are given a Capital letter. Search for yourself at books.google.com/ngrams (type in Congress,congress )

    – Hugh
    6 hours ago






  • 1





    What is the first line of the Declaration of Independence?

    – Hot Licks
    5 hours ago






  • 2





    Your comment skillfully alluded to an ironic error in spelling that had previously eluded discovery! Thank you @jim I will leave it up for the sake of entertainment

    – People Call Me Adam
    5 hours ago











  • @Hugh I will have to look into this. It is unfortunate that this question was treated so harshly when the content of it's message seemed to far outweigh the poorness of it's semantic composition.

    – People Call Me Adam
    5 hours ago
















1















According to Merriam-Webster, a definition of Congress is
"1a: the act or action of coming together and meeting". The first known use of the word is "1528, in the meaning defined at sense 1a" and the etymology of the word is as follows:




Latin congressus, from congredi to come together, from com- + gradi to go




The first use of the word "Congress" referred to "The act or action of coming together or meeting" while the current use of the word seems to be preferential towards the idea that "Congress" is an "entity" rather than an "action" between two parties such as "The House Of Representatives" and the "Senate" which would in effect form the "Congress".



My question is, at the time of its use within the Constitution of The United States Of America would the word "Congress" be correctly defined if it alluded to anything other than a "meeting" or "the action of meeting"?



It is understood that there are multiple definitions for the term "congress", for the purpose of this post I am looking for the definition that was originally intended when written within the Constitution and if possible some supporting evidence such as context clues, other uses of the word during that time period, sentence structuring, or other evidence. One such example of a definition is the act of meeting where as later definitions seem to point to the word "congress" referring to an entity rather than an action.










share|improve this question

























  • Strange things happen to words when they are given a Capital letter. Search for yourself at books.google.com/ngrams (type in Congress,congress )

    – Hugh
    6 hours ago






  • 1





    What is the first line of the Declaration of Independence?

    – Hot Licks
    5 hours ago






  • 2





    Your comment skillfully alluded to an ironic error in spelling that had previously eluded discovery! Thank you @jim I will leave it up for the sake of entertainment

    – People Call Me Adam
    5 hours ago











  • @Hugh I will have to look into this. It is unfortunate that this question was treated so harshly when the content of it's message seemed to far outweigh the poorness of it's semantic composition.

    – People Call Me Adam
    5 hours ago














1












1








1








According to Merriam-Webster, a definition of Congress is
"1a: the act or action of coming together and meeting". The first known use of the word is "1528, in the meaning defined at sense 1a" and the etymology of the word is as follows:




Latin congressus, from congredi to come together, from com- + gradi to go




The first use of the word "Congress" referred to "The act or action of coming together or meeting" while the current use of the word seems to be preferential towards the idea that "Congress" is an "entity" rather than an "action" between two parties such as "The House Of Representatives" and the "Senate" which would in effect form the "Congress".



My question is, at the time of its use within the Constitution of The United States Of America would the word "Congress" be correctly defined if it alluded to anything other than a "meeting" or "the action of meeting"?



It is understood that there are multiple definitions for the term "congress", for the purpose of this post I am looking for the definition that was originally intended when written within the Constitution and if possible some supporting evidence such as context clues, other uses of the word during that time period, sentence structuring, or other evidence. One such example of a definition is the act of meeting where as later definitions seem to point to the word "congress" referring to an entity rather than an action.










share|improve this question
















According to Merriam-Webster, a definition of Congress is
"1a: the act or action of coming together and meeting". The first known use of the word is "1528, in the meaning defined at sense 1a" and the etymology of the word is as follows:




Latin congressus, from congredi to come together, from com- + gradi to go




The first use of the word "Congress" referred to "The act or action of coming together or meeting" while the current use of the word seems to be preferential towards the idea that "Congress" is an "entity" rather than an "action" between two parties such as "The House Of Representatives" and the "Senate" which would in effect form the "Congress".



My question is, at the time of its use within the Constitution of The United States Of America would the word "Congress" be correctly defined if it alluded to anything other than a "meeting" or "the action of meeting"?



It is understood that there are multiple definitions for the term "congress", for the purpose of this post I am looking for the definition that was originally intended when written within the Constitution and if possible some supporting evidence such as context clues, other uses of the word during that time period, sentence structuring, or other evidence. One such example of a definition is the act of meeting where as later definitions seem to point to the word "congress" referring to an entity rather than an action.







etymology






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 5 hours ago









Laurel

33.5k667118




33.5k667118










asked 6 hours ago









People Call Me AdamPeople Call Me Adam

498




498













  • Strange things happen to words when they are given a Capital letter. Search for yourself at books.google.com/ngrams (type in Congress,congress )

    – Hugh
    6 hours ago






  • 1





    What is the first line of the Declaration of Independence?

    – Hot Licks
    5 hours ago






  • 2





    Your comment skillfully alluded to an ironic error in spelling that had previously eluded discovery! Thank you @jim I will leave it up for the sake of entertainment

    – People Call Me Adam
    5 hours ago











  • @Hugh I will have to look into this. It is unfortunate that this question was treated so harshly when the content of it's message seemed to far outweigh the poorness of it's semantic composition.

    – People Call Me Adam
    5 hours ago



















  • Strange things happen to words when they are given a Capital letter. Search for yourself at books.google.com/ngrams (type in Congress,congress )

    – Hugh
    6 hours ago






  • 1





    What is the first line of the Declaration of Independence?

    – Hot Licks
    5 hours ago






  • 2





    Your comment skillfully alluded to an ironic error in spelling that had previously eluded discovery! Thank you @jim I will leave it up for the sake of entertainment

    – People Call Me Adam
    5 hours ago











  • @Hugh I will have to look into this. It is unfortunate that this question was treated so harshly when the content of it's message seemed to far outweigh the poorness of it's semantic composition.

    – People Call Me Adam
    5 hours ago

















Strange things happen to words when they are given a Capital letter. Search for yourself at books.google.com/ngrams (type in Congress,congress )

– Hugh
6 hours ago





Strange things happen to words when they are given a Capital letter. Search for yourself at books.google.com/ngrams (type in Congress,congress )

– Hugh
6 hours ago




1




1





What is the first line of the Declaration of Independence?

– Hot Licks
5 hours ago





What is the first line of the Declaration of Independence?

– Hot Licks
5 hours ago




2




2





Your comment skillfully alluded to an ironic error in spelling that had previously eluded discovery! Thank you @jim I will leave it up for the sake of entertainment

– People Call Me Adam
5 hours ago





Your comment skillfully alluded to an ironic error in spelling that had previously eluded discovery! Thank you @jim I will leave it up for the sake of entertainment

– People Call Me Adam
5 hours ago













@Hugh I will have to look into this. It is unfortunate that this question was treated so harshly when the content of it's message seemed to far outweigh the poorness of it's semantic composition.

– People Call Me Adam
5 hours ago





@Hugh I will have to look into this. It is unfortunate that this question was treated so harshly when the content of it's message seemed to far outweigh the poorness of it's semantic composition.

– People Call Me Adam
5 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















4














The New World of Words (despite its name) had an edition published in 1706 with these definitions:




Congress, a coming together, Meeting, or Rencounter; an Encount'ring: It is now generally taken for the Assembly, or Meeting together of the Deputies, or Plenipotentiaries of several Princes, to Treat about a Peace, or any other important Affair.



Congress or Congers, a particular Society of Book-sellers, who put in Joynt Stocks for the Buying and Printing of Copies, and Trading for their common Advantage.




The first definition was also in the 1678 edition (found via OED.com):




Congress, is now generally taken for the Assembly or Meeting together of the Deputies, or Plenipotentiaries of several Princes, to treat about a Peace, or any other grand Affair.




Compare with the 1671 edition.



Although this may not be the earliest example, it's well before any US Congress, which was an idea people were thinking about as far back as 1765.






share|improve this answer
























  • this is some interesting information! It really brings up some questions.

    – People Call Me Adam
    4 hours ago



















0














It seems that your question is about the etymology of the word congress, and specifically was it a verb or a noun denoting an action (the act of meeting) until the nascent USA used it as a noun (a body that meets), and a proper noun at that.



According to this site it had the sense of a meeting of individuals from c. 1520 and a a representative body since 1670. https://www.etymonline.com/word/congress



Also, the dictionary you cite has a body that meets as definition 2.






share|improve this answer
























  • Thank you, there are indeed multiple definitions of the word congress, though the intent of the question was to determine if the definition of the word "Congress" (as used in the Constitution at the time it was originally written) would be correctly defined ("contextually"?) If it were to refer to anything other than the ACT of meeting.

    – People Call Me Adam
    5 hours ago











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f489364%2fwas-congress-used-to-refer-to-an-entity-before-the-constitution%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









4














The New World of Words (despite its name) had an edition published in 1706 with these definitions:




Congress, a coming together, Meeting, or Rencounter; an Encount'ring: It is now generally taken for the Assembly, or Meeting together of the Deputies, or Plenipotentiaries of several Princes, to Treat about a Peace, or any other important Affair.



Congress or Congers, a particular Society of Book-sellers, who put in Joynt Stocks for the Buying and Printing of Copies, and Trading for their common Advantage.




The first definition was also in the 1678 edition (found via OED.com):




Congress, is now generally taken for the Assembly or Meeting together of the Deputies, or Plenipotentiaries of several Princes, to treat about a Peace, or any other grand Affair.




Compare with the 1671 edition.



Although this may not be the earliest example, it's well before any US Congress, which was an idea people were thinking about as far back as 1765.






share|improve this answer
























  • this is some interesting information! It really brings up some questions.

    – People Call Me Adam
    4 hours ago
















4














The New World of Words (despite its name) had an edition published in 1706 with these definitions:




Congress, a coming together, Meeting, or Rencounter; an Encount'ring: It is now generally taken for the Assembly, or Meeting together of the Deputies, or Plenipotentiaries of several Princes, to Treat about a Peace, or any other important Affair.



Congress or Congers, a particular Society of Book-sellers, who put in Joynt Stocks for the Buying and Printing of Copies, and Trading for their common Advantage.




The first definition was also in the 1678 edition (found via OED.com):




Congress, is now generally taken for the Assembly or Meeting together of the Deputies, or Plenipotentiaries of several Princes, to treat about a Peace, or any other grand Affair.




Compare with the 1671 edition.



Although this may not be the earliest example, it's well before any US Congress, which was an idea people were thinking about as far back as 1765.






share|improve this answer
























  • this is some interesting information! It really brings up some questions.

    – People Call Me Adam
    4 hours ago














4












4








4







The New World of Words (despite its name) had an edition published in 1706 with these definitions:




Congress, a coming together, Meeting, or Rencounter; an Encount'ring: It is now generally taken for the Assembly, or Meeting together of the Deputies, or Plenipotentiaries of several Princes, to Treat about a Peace, or any other important Affair.



Congress or Congers, a particular Society of Book-sellers, who put in Joynt Stocks for the Buying and Printing of Copies, and Trading for their common Advantage.




The first definition was also in the 1678 edition (found via OED.com):




Congress, is now generally taken for the Assembly or Meeting together of the Deputies, or Plenipotentiaries of several Princes, to treat about a Peace, or any other grand Affair.




Compare with the 1671 edition.



Although this may not be the earliest example, it's well before any US Congress, which was an idea people were thinking about as far back as 1765.






share|improve this answer













The New World of Words (despite its name) had an edition published in 1706 with these definitions:




Congress, a coming together, Meeting, or Rencounter; an Encount'ring: It is now generally taken for the Assembly, or Meeting together of the Deputies, or Plenipotentiaries of several Princes, to Treat about a Peace, or any other important Affair.



Congress or Congers, a particular Society of Book-sellers, who put in Joynt Stocks for the Buying and Printing of Copies, and Trading for their common Advantage.




The first definition was also in the 1678 edition (found via OED.com):




Congress, is now generally taken for the Assembly or Meeting together of the Deputies, or Plenipotentiaries of several Princes, to treat about a Peace, or any other grand Affair.




Compare with the 1671 edition.



Although this may not be the earliest example, it's well before any US Congress, which was an idea people were thinking about as far back as 1765.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 4 hours ago









LaurelLaurel

33.5k667118




33.5k667118













  • this is some interesting information! It really brings up some questions.

    – People Call Me Adam
    4 hours ago



















  • this is some interesting information! It really brings up some questions.

    – People Call Me Adam
    4 hours ago

















this is some interesting information! It really brings up some questions.

– People Call Me Adam
4 hours ago





this is some interesting information! It really brings up some questions.

– People Call Me Adam
4 hours ago













0














It seems that your question is about the etymology of the word congress, and specifically was it a verb or a noun denoting an action (the act of meeting) until the nascent USA used it as a noun (a body that meets), and a proper noun at that.



According to this site it had the sense of a meeting of individuals from c. 1520 and a a representative body since 1670. https://www.etymonline.com/word/congress



Also, the dictionary you cite has a body that meets as definition 2.






share|improve this answer
























  • Thank you, there are indeed multiple definitions of the word congress, though the intent of the question was to determine if the definition of the word "Congress" (as used in the Constitution at the time it was originally written) would be correctly defined ("contextually"?) If it were to refer to anything other than the ACT of meeting.

    – People Call Me Adam
    5 hours ago
















0














It seems that your question is about the etymology of the word congress, and specifically was it a verb or a noun denoting an action (the act of meeting) until the nascent USA used it as a noun (a body that meets), and a proper noun at that.



According to this site it had the sense of a meeting of individuals from c. 1520 and a a representative body since 1670. https://www.etymonline.com/word/congress



Also, the dictionary you cite has a body that meets as definition 2.






share|improve this answer
























  • Thank you, there are indeed multiple definitions of the word congress, though the intent of the question was to determine if the definition of the word "Congress" (as used in the Constitution at the time it was originally written) would be correctly defined ("contextually"?) If it were to refer to anything other than the ACT of meeting.

    – People Call Me Adam
    5 hours ago














0












0








0







It seems that your question is about the etymology of the word congress, and specifically was it a verb or a noun denoting an action (the act of meeting) until the nascent USA used it as a noun (a body that meets), and a proper noun at that.



According to this site it had the sense of a meeting of individuals from c. 1520 and a a representative body since 1670. https://www.etymonline.com/word/congress



Also, the dictionary you cite has a body that meets as definition 2.






share|improve this answer













It seems that your question is about the etymology of the word congress, and specifically was it a verb or a noun denoting an action (the act of meeting) until the nascent USA used it as a noun (a body that meets), and a proper noun at that.



According to this site it had the sense of a meeting of individuals from c. 1520 and a a representative body since 1670. https://www.etymonline.com/word/congress



Also, the dictionary you cite has a body that meets as definition 2.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 6 hours ago









DamilaDamila

3177




3177













  • Thank you, there are indeed multiple definitions of the word congress, though the intent of the question was to determine if the definition of the word "Congress" (as used in the Constitution at the time it was originally written) would be correctly defined ("contextually"?) If it were to refer to anything other than the ACT of meeting.

    – People Call Me Adam
    5 hours ago



















  • Thank you, there are indeed multiple definitions of the word congress, though the intent of the question was to determine if the definition of the word "Congress" (as used in the Constitution at the time it was originally written) would be correctly defined ("contextually"?) If it were to refer to anything other than the ACT of meeting.

    – People Call Me Adam
    5 hours ago

















Thank you, there are indeed multiple definitions of the word congress, though the intent of the question was to determine if the definition of the word "Congress" (as used in the Constitution at the time it was originally written) would be correctly defined ("contextually"?) If it were to refer to anything other than the ACT of meeting.

– People Call Me Adam
5 hours ago





Thank you, there are indeed multiple definitions of the word congress, though the intent of the question was to determine if the definition of the word "Congress" (as used in the Constitution at the time it was originally written) would be correctly defined ("contextually"?) If it were to refer to anything other than the ACT of meeting.

– People Call Me Adam
5 hours ago


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f489364%2fwas-congress-used-to-refer-to-an-entity-before-the-constitution%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

How did Captain America manage to do this?

迪纳利

南乌拉尔铁路局