Typesetting a double Over Dot on top of a symbol












6












$begingroup$


I wanted to make a notation with a double dot over a symbol in Mathematica. Searching online or in the documentation did not yield any results. However, just randomly attempting to give a second parameter to the OverDot function surprisingly did exactly what I needed:



enter image description here



I assume the red font suggests that Mathematica perceives this as a syntax mistake at some level, even though the output is as desired. Unfortunately, this does not work for three dots and more.




Is there a proper way to do this without red font appearing?







formatting







share|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    {Overscript[x, ".."], Overscript[x, "..."], Overscript[x, "[Ellipsis]"]}
    $endgroup$
    – Bob Hanlon
    Apr 9 at 1:35






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    The code editor and documentation are not always completely in sync with the actual typesetting. This is only one of several examples. Ignore the code coloring.
    $endgroup$
    – m_goldberg
    Apr 9 at 2:35










  • $begingroup$
    @BobHanlon as a German speaker I perceive your Overscript[x, ".."] Umlaut to be very improperly typeset. Overscript[x, "¨"] is bad as well. They work, yes; but not for publication. Cheers!
    $endgroup$
    – Roman
    2 days ago












  • $begingroup$
    @Roman Why not just literally use the German character set for that? The double dot over a symbol has e.g. the meaning of a second time derivative in Physics -- which is typeset properly.
    $endgroup$
    – Kagaratsch
    2 days ago












  • $begingroup$
    For Umlaut characters you only get äëïöüÿ from the font set but not the others. That wasn't my point though. All I'm saying is that the size of the dots and their distance must be appropriate for the chosen font, otherwise it looks very bad for a native speaker of German, Turkish, Swedish, French, etc. If you don't care about the aesthetics, then all the given solutions work, sure.
    $endgroup$
    – Roman
    2 days ago
















6












$begingroup$


I wanted to make a notation with a double dot over a symbol in Mathematica. Searching online or in the documentation did not yield any results. However, just randomly attempting to give a second parameter to the OverDot function surprisingly did exactly what I needed:



enter image description here



I assume the red font suggests that Mathematica perceives this as a syntax mistake at some level, even though the output is as desired. Unfortunately, this does not work for three dots and more.




Is there a proper way to do this without red font appearing?







formatting







share|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    {Overscript[x, ".."], Overscript[x, "..."], Overscript[x, "[Ellipsis]"]}
    $endgroup$
    – Bob Hanlon
    Apr 9 at 1:35






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    The code editor and documentation are not always completely in sync with the actual typesetting. This is only one of several examples. Ignore the code coloring.
    $endgroup$
    – m_goldberg
    Apr 9 at 2:35










  • $begingroup$
    @BobHanlon as a German speaker I perceive your Overscript[x, ".."] Umlaut to be very improperly typeset. Overscript[x, "¨"] is bad as well. They work, yes; but not for publication. Cheers!
    $endgroup$
    – Roman
    2 days ago












  • $begingroup$
    @Roman Why not just literally use the German character set for that? The double dot over a symbol has e.g. the meaning of a second time derivative in Physics -- which is typeset properly.
    $endgroup$
    – Kagaratsch
    2 days ago












  • $begingroup$
    For Umlaut characters you only get äëïöüÿ from the font set but not the others. That wasn't my point though. All I'm saying is that the size of the dots and their distance must be appropriate for the chosen font, otherwise it looks very bad for a native speaker of German, Turkish, Swedish, French, etc. If you don't care about the aesthetics, then all the given solutions work, sure.
    $endgroup$
    – Roman
    2 days ago














6












6








6





$begingroup$


I wanted to make a notation with a double dot over a symbol in Mathematica. Searching online or in the documentation did not yield any results. However, just randomly attempting to give a second parameter to the OverDot function surprisingly did exactly what I needed:



enter image description here



I assume the red font suggests that Mathematica perceives this as a syntax mistake at some level, even though the output is as desired. Unfortunately, this does not work for three dots and more.




Is there a proper way to do this without red font appearing?







formatting







share|improve this question









$endgroup$




I wanted to make a notation with a double dot over a symbol in Mathematica. Searching online or in the documentation did not yield any results. However, just randomly attempting to give a second parameter to the OverDot function surprisingly did exactly what I needed:



enter image description here



I assume the red font suggests that Mathematica perceives this as a syntax mistake at some level, even though the output is as desired. Unfortunately, this does not work for three dots and more.




Is there a proper way to do this without red font appearing?







formatting




formatting






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Apr 9 at 1:08









KagaratschKagaratsch

4,83831348




4,83831348








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    {Overscript[x, ".."], Overscript[x, "..."], Overscript[x, "[Ellipsis]"]}
    $endgroup$
    – Bob Hanlon
    Apr 9 at 1:35






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    The code editor and documentation are not always completely in sync with the actual typesetting. This is only one of several examples. Ignore the code coloring.
    $endgroup$
    – m_goldberg
    Apr 9 at 2:35










  • $begingroup$
    @BobHanlon as a German speaker I perceive your Overscript[x, ".."] Umlaut to be very improperly typeset. Overscript[x, "¨"] is bad as well. They work, yes; but not for publication. Cheers!
    $endgroup$
    – Roman
    2 days ago












  • $begingroup$
    @Roman Why not just literally use the German character set for that? The double dot over a symbol has e.g. the meaning of a second time derivative in Physics -- which is typeset properly.
    $endgroup$
    – Kagaratsch
    2 days ago












  • $begingroup$
    For Umlaut characters you only get äëïöüÿ from the font set but not the others. That wasn't my point though. All I'm saying is that the size of the dots and their distance must be appropriate for the chosen font, otherwise it looks very bad for a native speaker of German, Turkish, Swedish, French, etc. If you don't care about the aesthetics, then all the given solutions work, sure.
    $endgroup$
    – Roman
    2 days ago














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    {Overscript[x, ".."], Overscript[x, "..."], Overscript[x, "[Ellipsis]"]}
    $endgroup$
    – Bob Hanlon
    Apr 9 at 1:35






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    The code editor and documentation are not always completely in sync with the actual typesetting. This is only one of several examples. Ignore the code coloring.
    $endgroup$
    – m_goldberg
    Apr 9 at 2:35










  • $begingroup$
    @BobHanlon as a German speaker I perceive your Overscript[x, ".."] Umlaut to be very improperly typeset. Overscript[x, "¨"] is bad as well. They work, yes; but not for publication. Cheers!
    $endgroup$
    – Roman
    2 days ago












  • $begingroup$
    @Roman Why not just literally use the German character set for that? The double dot over a symbol has e.g. the meaning of a second time derivative in Physics -- which is typeset properly.
    $endgroup$
    – Kagaratsch
    2 days ago












  • $begingroup$
    For Umlaut characters you only get äëïöüÿ from the font set but not the others. That wasn't my point though. All I'm saying is that the size of the dots and their distance must be appropriate for the chosen font, otherwise it looks very bad for a native speaker of German, Turkish, Swedish, French, etc. If you don't care about the aesthetics, then all the given solutions work, sure.
    $endgroup$
    – Roman
    2 days ago








1




1




$begingroup$
{Overscript[x, ".."], Overscript[x, "..."], Overscript[x, "[Ellipsis]"]}
$endgroup$
– Bob Hanlon
Apr 9 at 1:35




$begingroup$
{Overscript[x, ".."], Overscript[x, "..."], Overscript[x, "[Ellipsis]"]}
$endgroup$
– Bob Hanlon
Apr 9 at 1:35




3




3




$begingroup$
The code editor and documentation are not always completely in sync with the actual typesetting. This is only one of several examples. Ignore the code coloring.
$endgroup$
– m_goldberg
Apr 9 at 2:35




$begingroup$
The code editor and documentation are not always completely in sync with the actual typesetting. This is only one of several examples. Ignore the code coloring.
$endgroup$
– m_goldberg
Apr 9 at 2:35












$begingroup$
@BobHanlon as a German speaker I perceive your Overscript[x, ".."] Umlaut to be very improperly typeset. Overscript[x, "¨"] is bad as well. They work, yes; but not for publication. Cheers!
$endgroup$
– Roman
2 days ago






$begingroup$
@BobHanlon as a German speaker I perceive your Overscript[x, ".."] Umlaut to be very improperly typeset. Overscript[x, "¨"] is bad as well. They work, yes; but not for publication. Cheers!
$endgroup$
– Roman
2 days ago














$begingroup$
@Roman Why not just literally use the German character set for that? The double dot over a symbol has e.g. the meaning of a second time derivative in Physics -- which is typeset properly.
$endgroup$
– Kagaratsch
2 days ago






$begingroup$
@Roman Why not just literally use the German character set for that? The double dot over a symbol has e.g. the meaning of a second time derivative in Physics -- which is typeset properly.
$endgroup$
– Kagaratsch
2 days ago














$begingroup$
For Umlaut characters you only get äëïöüÿ from the font set but not the others. That wasn't my point though. All I'm saying is that the size of the dots and their distance must be appropriate for the chosen font, otherwise it looks very bad for a native speaker of German, Turkish, Swedish, French, etc. If you don't care about the aesthetics, then all the given solutions work, sure.
$endgroup$
– Roman
2 days ago




$begingroup$
For Umlaut characters you only get äëïöüÿ from the font set but not the others. That wasn't my point though. All I'm saying is that the size of the dots and their distance must be appropriate for the chosen font, otherwise it looks very bad for a native speaker of German, Turkish, Swedish, French, etc. If you don't care about the aesthetics, then all the given solutions work, sure.
$endgroup$
– Roman
2 days ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















13












$begingroup$

Use ToBoxes to find the boxes generated for OverDot[x, 2]:



OverDot[x,2] //ToBoxes



OverscriptBox["x", "¨"]




You can reproduce these boxes using Overscript:



Overscript[x, RawBoxes @ "¨"]



enter image description here




You can use the same approach for triple dots:



Overscript[x, RawBoxes @ "[TripleDot]"]



enter image description here




For more dots, you will have to use a different mechanism to generate the dots, e.g.:



Overscript[x, Style[Row[{".",".",".","."}],FontTracking->"Condensed"]]



enter image description here




Update



You could also overload OverDot to work with the 3 and higher versions (I also included @Michael's syntax information fix):



SyntaxInformation[OverDot] = {"ArgumentsPattern" -> {_, _.}};

MakeBoxes[OverDot[a_, n_Integer?(GreaterThan[2])], StandardForm] := If[n==3,

    OverscriptBox[MakeBoxes[a], "[TripleDot]"],

    OverscriptBox[

        MakeBoxes[a],

        ToBoxes @ Style[Row[ConstantArray[".", n]], FontTracking->"Condensed"]

    ]

]


Then:



enter image description here






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$





















    8












    $begingroup$

    You could fix the syntax highlighting, or ignore it. Here's a fix:



    SyntaxInformation[OverDot] = {"ArgumentsPattern" -> {_, _.}};


    Mathematica graphics






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$





















      3












      $begingroup$

      Go to the Basic math assistant palette and click on the template.



      enter image description here






      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$













      • $begingroup$
        There indeed is a [DoubleDot] template, but it actually leads to an expression with the FullForm OverDot[X,2]! So the syntax is in fact intended, then I'm confused why Mathematica marks it in red font when typed in directly?
        $endgroup$
        – Kagaratsch
        Apr 9 at 1:13








      • 1




        $begingroup$
        Yes... confusing. The documentation for OverDot shows only one argument... so the $2$ is somehow treated extraneously. (Perhaps a bug report is in order.)
        $endgroup$
        – David G. Stork
        Apr 9 at 1:21












      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      });
      });
      }, "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "387"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f194850%2ftypesetting-a-double-over-dot-on-top-of-a-symbol%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      13












      $begingroup$

      Use ToBoxes to find the boxes generated for OverDot[x, 2]:



      OverDot[x,2] //ToBoxes



      OverscriptBox["x", "¨"]




      You can reproduce these boxes using Overscript:



      Overscript[x, RawBoxes @ "¨"]



      enter image description here




      You can use the same approach for triple dots:



      Overscript[x, RawBoxes @ "[TripleDot]"]



      enter image description here




      For more dots, you will have to use a different mechanism to generate the dots, e.g.:



      Overscript[x, Style[Row[{".",".",".","."}],FontTracking->"Condensed"]]



      enter image description here




      Update



      You could also overload OverDot to work with the 3 and higher versions (I also included @Michael's syntax information fix):



      SyntaxInformation[OverDot] = {"ArgumentsPattern" -> {_, _.}};
      
MakeBoxes[OverDot[a_, n_Integer?(GreaterThan[2])], StandardForm] := If[n==3,
      
    OverscriptBox[MakeBoxes[a], "[TripleDot]"],
      
    OverscriptBox[
      
        MakeBoxes[a],
      
        ToBoxes @ Style[Row[ConstantArray[".", n]], FontTracking->"Condensed"]
      
    ]
      
]


      Then:



      enter image description here






      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$


















        13












        $begingroup$

        Use ToBoxes to find the boxes generated for OverDot[x, 2]:



        OverDot[x,2] //ToBoxes



        OverscriptBox["x", "¨"]




        You can reproduce these boxes using Overscript:



        Overscript[x, RawBoxes @ "¨"]



        enter image description here




        You can use the same approach for triple dots:



        Overscript[x, RawBoxes @ "[TripleDot]"]



        enter image description here




        For more dots, you will have to use a different mechanism to generate the dots, e.g.:



        Overscript[x, Style[Row[{".",".",".","."}],FontTracking->"Condensed"]]



        enter image description here




        Update



        You could also overload OverDot to work with the 3 and higher versions (I also included @Michael's syntax information fix):



        SyntaxInformation[OverDot] = {"ArgumentsPattern" -> {_, _.}};
        
MakeBoxes[OverDot[a_, n_Integer?(GreaterThan[2])], StandardForm] := If[n==3,
        
    OverscriptBox[MakeBoxes[a], "[TripleDot]"],
        
    OverscriptBox[
        
        MakeBoxes[a],
        
        ToBoxes @ Style[Row[ConstantArray[".", n]], FontTracking->"Condensed"]
        
    ]
        
]


        Then:



        enter image description here






        share|improve this answer











        $endgroup$
















          13












          13








          13





          $begingroup$

          Use ToBoxes to find the boxes generated for OverDot[x, 2]:



          OverDot[x,2] //ToBoxes



          OverscriptBox["x", "¨"]




          You can reproduce these boxes using Overscript:



          Overscript[x, RawBoxes @ "¨"]



          enter image description here




          You can use the same approach for triple dots:



          Overscript[x, RawBoxes @ "[TripleDot]"]



          enter image description here




          For more dots, you will have to use a different mechanism to generate the dots, e.g.:



          Overscript[x, Style[Row[{".",".",".","."}],FontTracking->"Condensed"]]



          enter image description here




          Update



          You could also overload OverDot to work with the 3 and higher versions (I also included @Michael's syntax information fix):



          SyntaxInformation[OverDot] = {"ArgumentsPattern" -> {_, _.}};
          
MakeBoxes[OverDot[a_, n_Integer?(GreaterThan[2])], StandardForm] := If[n==3,
          
    OverscriptBox[MakeBoxes[a], "[TripleDot]"],
          
    OverscriptBox[
          
        MakeBoxes[a],
          
        ToBoxes @ Style[Row[ConstantArray[".", n]], FontTracking->"Condensed"]
          
    ]
          
]


          Then:



          enter image description here






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          Use ToBoxes to find the boxes generated for OverDot[x, 2]:



          OverDot[x,2] //ToBoxes



          OverscriptBox["x", "¨"]




          You can reproduce these boxes using Overscript:



          Overscript[x, RawBoxes @ "¨"]



          enter image description here




          You can use the same approach for triple dots:



          Overscript[x, RawBoxes @ "[TripleDot]"]



          enter image description here




          For more dots, you will have to use a different mechanism to generate the dots, e.g.:



          Overscript[x, Style[Row[{".",".",".","."}],FontTracking->"Condensed"]]



          enter image description here




          Update



          You could also overload OverDot to work with the 3 and higher versions (I also included @Michael's syntax information fix):



          SyntaxInformation[OverDot] = {"ArgumentsPattern" -> {_, _.}};
          
MakeBoxes[OverDot[a_, n_Integer?(GreaterThan[2])], StandardForm] := If[n==3,
          
    OverscriptBox[MakeBoxes[a], "[TripleDot]"],
          
    OverscriptBox[
          
        MakeBoxes[a],
          
        ToBoxes @ Style[Row[ConstantArray[".", n]], FontTracking->"Condensed"]
          
    ]
          
]


          Then:



          enter image description here







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited 2 days ago

























          answered Apr 9 at 2:12









          Carl WollCarl Woll

          73.4k398192




          73.4k398192























              8












              $begingroup$

              You could fix the syntax highlighting, or ignore it. Here's a fix:



              SyntaxInformation[OverDot] = {"ArgumentsPattern" -> {_, _.}};


              Mathematica graphics






              share|improve this answer









              $endgroup$


















                8












                $begingroup$

                You could fix the syntax highlighting, or ignore it. Here's a fix:



                SyntaxInformation[OverDot] = {"ArgumentsPattern" -> {_, _.}};


                Mathematica graphics






                share|improve this answer









                $endgroup$
















                  8












                  8








                  8





                  $begingroup$

                  You could fix the syntax highlighting, or ignore it. Here's a fix:



                  SyntaxInformation[OverDot] = {"ArgumentsPattern" -> {_, _.}};


                  Mathematica graphics






                  share|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  You could fix the syntax highlighting, or ignore it. Here's a fix:



                  SyntaxInformation[OverDot] = {"ArgumentsPattern" -> {_, _.}};


                  Mathematica graphics







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered Apr 9 at 2:12









                  Michael E2Michael E2

                  150k12203482




                  150k12203482























                      3












                      $begingroup$

                      Go to the Basic math assistant palette and click on the template.



                      enter image description here






                      share|improve this answer











                      $endgroup$













                      • $begingroup$
                        There indeed is a [DoubleDot] template, but it actually leads to an expression with the FullForm OverDot[X,2]! So the syntax is in fact intended, then I'm confused why Mathematica marks it in red font when typed in directly?
                        $endgroup$
                        – Kagaratsch
                        Apr 9 at 1:13








                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        Yes... confusing. The documentation for OverDot shows only one argument... so the $2$ is somehow treated extraneously. (Perhaps a bug report is in order.)
                        $endgroup$
                        – David G. Stork
                        Apr 9 at 1:21
















                      3












                      $begingroup$

                      Go to the Basic math assistant palette and click on the template.



                      enter image description here






                      share|improve this answer











                      $endgroup$













                      • $begingroup$
                        There indeed is a [DoubleDot] template, but it actually leads to an expression with the FullForm OverDot[X,2]! So the syntax is in fact intended, then I'm confused why Mathematica marks it in red font when typed in directly?
                        $endgroup$
                        – Kagaratsch
                        Apr 9 at 1:13








                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        Yes... confusing. The documentation for OverDot shows only one argument... so the $2$ is somehow treated extraneously. (Perhaps a bug report is in order.)
                        $endgroup$
                        – David G. Stork
                        Apr 9 at 1:21














                      3












                      3








                      3





                      $begingroup$

                      Go to the Basic math assistant palette and click on the template.



                      enter image description here






                      share|improve this answer











                      $endgroup$



                      Go to the Basic math assistant palette and click on the template.



                      enter image description here







                      share|improve this answer














                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer








                      edited Apr 9 at 1:19

























                      answered Apr 9 at 1:10









                      David G. StorkDavid G. Stork

                      24.9k22155




                      24.9k22155












                      • $begingroup$
                        There indeed is a [DoubleDot] template, but it actually leads to an expression with the FullForm OverDot[X,2]! So the syntax is in fact intended, then I'm confused why Mathematica marks it in red font when typed in directly?
                        $endgroup$
                        – Kagaratsch
                        Apr 9 at 1:13








                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        Yes... confusing. The documentation for OverDot shows only one argument... so the $2$ is somehow treated extraneously. (Perhaps a bug report is in order.)
                        $endgroup$
                        – David G. Stork
                        Apr 9 at 1:21


















                      • $begingroup$
                        There indeed is a [DoubleDot] template, but it actually leads to an expression with the FullForm OverDot[X,2]! So the syntax is in fact intended, then I'm confused why Mathematica marks it in red font when typed in directly?
                        $endgroup$
                        – Kagaratsch
                        Apr 9 at 1:13








                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        Yes... confusing. The documentation for OverDot shows only one argument... so the $2$ is somehow treated extraneously. (Perhaps a bug report is in order.)
                        $endgroup$
                        – David G. Stork
                        Apr 9 at 1:21
















                      $begingroup$
                      There indeed is a [DoubleDot] template, but it actually leads to an expression with the FullForm OverDot[X,2]! So the syntax is in fact intended, then I'm confused why Mathematica marks it in red font when typed in directly?
                      $endgroup$
                      – Kagaratsch
                      Apr 9 at 1:13






                      $begingroup$
                      There indeed is a [DoubleDot] template, but it actually leads to an expression with the FullForm OverDot[X,2]! So the syntax is in fact intended, then I'm confused why Mathematica marks it in red font when typed in directly?
                      $endgroup$
                      – Kagaratsch
                      Apr 9 at 1:13






                      1




                      1




                      $begingroup$
                      Yes... confusing. The documentation for OverDot shows only one argument... so the $2$ is somehow treated extraneously. (Perhaps a bug report is in order.)
                      $endgroup$
                      – David G. Stork
                      Apr 9 at 1:21




                      $begingroup$
                      Yes... confusing. The documentation for OverDot shows only one argument... so the $2$ is somehow treated extraneously. (Perhaps a bug report is in order.)
                      $endgroup$
                      – David G. Stork
                      Apr 9 at 1:21


















                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematica Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid …



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f194850%2ftypesetting-a-double-over-dot-on-top-of-a-symbol%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      -

                      Popular posts from this blog

                      數位音樂下載

                      Image
                      數位音樂下載 為非以「實體」方式來販賣音樂的相關產品，而使用數位格式如mp3、AAC等文件格式來進行銷售販賣的一种音乐产业形式。著名的數位音樂下載服務商有iTunes Store、RecoChoku、Google Play音乐和微软Zune等。数字音乐下载在二十一世纪初一度风靡全球， [1] [2] 使得传统唱片产业走向衰落，但其自身也在2010年代流媒体音乐服务如Apple Music、Spotify等的挤压下迅速失去市场份额。 [3] [4] 数字音乐下载有便于携带、传播迅速、制作简单成本低等优点，与流媒体音乐相比也能更好保障音乐人权益； [5] 但它同时很可能带来侵犯版权和滥用的情形， [6] 也给音乐产业带来了诸多不利影响。数字音乐下载为音乐人和乐迷提供了更加便捷直接的交流渠道，也一定程度上推动了网络音乐人的出现和独立音乐的迅速发展。 [7] 目录 1 历史 1.1 技术积淀（1987-2000） 1.2 出现与兴起（2000-2004） 1.3 唱片市场的颠覆者（2004-2007） 1.4 巅峰和衰落（2005-2013） 1.5 摇摇欲坠的现状与不可预知的明天（2014至今） 2 主要文件格式 2.1 PCM编码格式 2.1.1 WAV 2.1.2 APE 2.1.3 FLAC 2.2 苹果推出的无损文件格式 2.2.1 AIFF 2.2.2 ALAC 2.3 有损压缩格式 2.3.1 MP3 2.3.2 AAC 3 主要市场 3.1 iTunes Store 3.2 Google Play音乐商店 3.3 亚马逊音乐商店 3.4 部分其他音乐商店 4 影响与评价 4.1 对音乐产业的影响 4.2 对科技行业的影响 4.3 正面评价 4.4 负面评价 4.4.1 侵权问题 4.4.2 经营模式不明晰 4.4.3 不适应移动时代 4.5 文化现象 5 延伸阅读 6 参考资料 历史 苹果iTunes+iPod的软硬件搭配让数字音...
                      Read more

                      When can things happen in Etherscan, such as the picture below?

                      Image
                      2 I don't know why balance of the address is 0. when can this situation? etherscan balances share | improve this question asked yesterday Ru Hi Ru Hi 11 1 New contributor Ru Hi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering. Check out our Code of Conduct. add a comment  |  ...
                      Read more

                      格利澤436b

                      Image
                      格利泽436b 太陽系外行星 太陽系外行星列表 艺术家笔下的格利泽436b 母恆星 母恆星 Gliese 436 星座 獅子座 赤經 ( α ) 11 h  42 m  11.0941 s [1] 赤緯 ( δ ) +26° 42′ 23.652″ [1] 距離 33.4 ly (10.2 pc) 光譜類型 M2.5 V [1] 軌道參數 半长轴 ( a ) 0.0291±0.0004 [2] AU 軌道離心率 ( e ) 0.150±0.012 [2] 公轉週期 ( P ) 2.643904±0.000005 [3] d (0.00723849 y) 軌道傾角 ( i ) 85.8 +0.21 −0.25 [3] ° 角距 ( θ ) 2.794 mas 近星點時間 ( T 0 ) 2,451,551.716 ±0.01 JD 半振幅 ( K ) 18.68±0.8 m/s 物理性质 质量 ( m ) 22.2±1.0 [2] M ⊕ 半徑 ( r ) 4.327±0.183 [2] [4] R ⊕ 密度 ( ρ ) 1.51 g cm -3 表面重力 ( g ) 1.18 g 溫度 ( T ) 712±36 [2] K 發現 發現時間 2004 發現者 巴特勒、沃格特、 馬西 et al. 發現方法 徑向速度、凌日法 發現地點 美國加利福尼亞州 發表論文 出版 其他名稱 Ross 905 b, GJ 436 b, [5] LTT 13213 b, GCTP 2704.10 b, LHS 310, AC+27:28217 b, Vyssotsky 616 b, HIP 57087 b, GEN# +9.80120068 b, LP 319-75 b, G 121-7 b, LSPM J1142+2642 b, 1RXS J114211.9+264328 b, ASCC 683818 b, G 147-68 b, UCAC2 41198281 b, BP...
                      Read more