LTSP fat clients not connecting to internet in proxy DHCP mode
My current setup is modem to router. Router(10.10.10.0/24) to virtual server via enp8s1. Virtual machine running pfsense as a DHCP server via enp3s0(a second nic in the server) a network 192.168.67.0/24. Another virtual computer, same server, setup with LTSP with ubuntu mate. I followed the steps on the LTSP.org page to the letter and the fat clients aren't getting internet. Now the 192 network gets internet. Every computer (besides the fat clients) gets an IP, and connects fine. No issue. The LTSP server is running in proxy mode (letting the pfsense router do all the IP routing stuff) and gets internet, but the fat clients aren't connecting to the internet. Does anyone know how to get the clients connected? If not, any suggestions?
The clients cannot ping the modem, 192.168.0.1 or the first router 10.10.10.1
networking routing ltsp
asked Jan 25 at 3:39
rvcabcrvcabc
597
add a comment |
My current setup is modem to router. Router(10.10.10.0/24) to virtual server via enp8s1. Virtual machine running pfsense as a DHCP server via enp3s0(a second nic in the server) a network 192.168.67.0/24. Another virtual computer, same server, setup with LTSP with ubuntu mate. I followed the steps on the LTSP.org page to the letter and the fat clients aren't getting internet. Now the 192 network gets internet. Every computer (besides the fat clients) gets an IP, and connects fine. No issue. The LTSP server is running in proxy mode (letting the pfsense router do all the IP routing stuff) and gets internet, but the fat clients aren't connecting to the internet. Does anyone know how to get the clients connected? If not, any suggestions?
The clients cannot ping the modem, 192.168.0.1 or the first router 10.10.10.1
networking routing ltsp
asked Jan 25 at 3:39
rvcabcrvcabc
597
For better reproducibility of the problem consider to create LTSP server and clients using VirtualBox (something like this article). As I wrote before - I did not tried 2 NIC configuration, so I can't help to debug this problem. For me proxyDHCP method is reliable and comfortable.
– N0rbert
2 days ago
@N0rbert I swear you help me everytime i ask a question here. I setit up sort of the way you suggested. I followed (wiki.ltsp.org/wiki/Installation/Ubuntu) to the letter. (copy paste) I preffered proxyDHCP cause i find it more realiable as well. I was working before on the server its self, but that crashed (bac=d hard drive) so I set it up as a vm instead. Its using the pfsense vm as a dhcp, which is pushing internet to all devices, not the ltsp clients. Think it might be a issue with setting it up from the start, or the fact that its a vm on a server (From 2003 btw)?
– rvcabc
2 days ago
I can't now but ill update the post with the server specs and vm specs when I can.
– rvcabc
2 days ago
add a comment |
My current setup is modem to router. Router(10.10.10.0/24) to virtual server via enp8s1. Virtual machine running pfsense as a DHCP server via enp3s0(a second nic in the server) a network 192.168.67.0/24. Another virtual computer, same server, setup with LTSP with ubuntu mate. I followed the steps on the LTSP.org page to the letter and the fat clients aren't getting internet. Now the 192 network gets internet. Every computer (besides the fat clients) gets an IP, and connects fine. No issue. The LTSP server is running in proxy mode (letting the pfsense router do all the IP routing stuff) and gets internet, but the fat clients aren't connecting to the internet. Does anyone know how to get the clients connected? If not, any suggestions?
The clients cannot ping the modem, 192.168.0.1 or the first router 10.10.10.1
networking routing ltsp
asked Jan 25 at 3:39
rvcabcrvcabc
597
My current setup is modem to router. Router(10.10.10.0/24) to virtual server via enp8s1. Virtual machine running pfsense as a DHCP server via enp3s0(a second nic in the server) a network 192.168.67.0/24. Another virtual computer, same server, setup with LTSP with ubuntu mate. I followed the steps on the LTSP.org page to the letter and the fat clients aren't getting internet. Now the 192 network gets internet. Every computer (besides the fat clients) gets an IP, and connects fine. No issue. The LTSP server is running in proxy mode (letting the pfsense router do all the IP routing stuff) and gets internet, but the fat clients aren't connecting to the internet. Does anyone know how to get the clients connected? If not, any suggestions?
The clients cannot ping the modem, 192.168.0.1 or the first router 10.10.10.1
networking routing ltsp
networking routing ltsp
asked Jan 25 at 3:39
rvcabcrvcabc
597
asked Jan 25 at 3:39
rvcabcrvcabc
597
asked Jan 25 at 3:39
rvcabcrvcabc
597
asked Jan 25 at 3:39
rvcabcrvcabc
597
asked Jan 25 at 3:39
rvcabcrvcabc
597
597
For better reproducibility of the problem consider to create LTSP server and clients using VirtualBox (something like this article). As I wrote before - I did not tried 2 NIC configuration, so I can't help to debug this problem. For me proxyDHCP method is reliable and comfortable.
– N0rbert
2 days ago
@N0rbert I swear you help me everytime i ask a question here. I setit up sort of the way you suggested. I followed (wiki.ltsp.org/wiki/Installation/Ubuntu) to the letter. (copy paste) I preffered proxyDHCP cause i find it more realiable as well. I was working before on the server its self, but that crashed (bac=d hard drive) so I set it up as a vm instead. Its using the pfsense vm as a dhcp, which is pushing internet to all devices, not the ltsp clients. Think it might be a issue with setting it up from the start, or the fact that its a vm on a server (From 2003 btw)?
– rvcabc
2 days ago
I can't now but ill update the post with the server specs and vm specs when I can.
– rvcabc
2 days ago
add a comment |
For better reproducibility of the problem consider to create LTSP server and clients using VirtualBox (something like this article). As I wrote before - I did not tried 2 NIC configuration, so I can't help to debug this problem. For me proxyDHCP method is reliable and comfortable.
– N0rbert
2 days ago
@N0rbert I swear you help me everytime i ask a question here. I setit up sort of the way you suggested. I followed (wiki.ltsp.org/wiki/Installation/Ubuntu) to the letter. (copy paste) I preffered proxyDHCP cause i find it more realiable as well. I was working before on the server its self, but that crashed (bac=d hard drive) so I set it up as a vm instead. Its using the pfsense vm as a dhcp, which is pushing internet to all devices, not the ltsp clients. Think it might be a issue with setting it up from the start, or the fact that its a vm on a server (From 2003 btw)?
– rvcabc
2 days ago
I can't now but ill update the post with the server specs and vm specs when I can.
– rvcabc
2 days ago
For better reproducibility of the problem consider to create LTSP server and clients using VirtualBox (something like this article). As I wrote before - I did not tried 2 NIC configuration, so I can't help to debug this problem. For me proxyDHCP method is reliable and comfortable.
– N0rbert
2 days ago
For better reproducibility of the problem consider to create LTSP server and clients using VirtualBox (something like this article). As I wrote before - I did not tried 2 NIC configuration, so I can't help to debug this problem. For me proxyDHCP method is reliable and comfortable.
– N0rbert
2 days ago
@N0rbert I swear you help me everytime i ask a question here. I setit up sort of the way you suggested. I followed (wiki.ltsp.org/wiki/Installation/Ubuntu) to the letter. (copy paste) I preffered proxyDHCP cause i find it more realiable as well. I was working before on the server its self, but that crashed (bac=d hard drive) so I set it up as a vm instead. Its using the pfsense vm as a dhcp, which is pushing internet to all devices, not the ltsp clients. Think it might be a issue with setting it up from the start, or the fact that its a vm on a server (From 2003 btw)?
– rvcabc
2 days ago
@N0rbert I swear you help me everytime i ask a question here. I setit up sort of the way you suggested. I followed (wiki.ltsp.org/wiki/Installation/Ubuntu) to the letter. (copy paste) I preffered proxyDHCP cause i find it more realiable as well. I was working before on the server its self, but that crashed (bac=d hard drive) so I set it up as a vm instead. Its using the pfsense vm as a dhcp, which is pushing internet to all devices, not the ltsp clients. Think it might be a issue with setting it up from the start, or the fact that its a vm on a server (From 2003 btw)?
– rvcabc
2 days ago
I can't now but ill update the post with the server specs and vm specs when I can.
– rvcabc
2 days ago
I can't now but ill update the post with the server specs and vm specs when I can.
– rvcabc
2 days ago
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "89"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1112677%2fltsp-fat-clients-not-connecting-to-internet-in-proxy-dhcp-mode%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Ask Ubuntu!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1112677%2fltsp-fat-clients-not-connecting-to-internet-in-proxy-dhcp-mode%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
For better reproducibility of the problem consider to create LTSP server and clients using VirtualBox (something like this article). As I wrote before - I did not tried 2 NIC configuration, so I can't help to debug this problem. For me proxyDHCP method is reliable and comfortable.
– N0rbert
2 days ago
@N0rbert I swear you help me everytime i ask a question here. I setit up sort of the way you suggested. I followed (wiki.ltsp.org/wiki/Installation/Ubuntu) to the letter. (copy paste) I preffered proxyDHCP cause i find it more realiable as well. I was working before on the server its self, but that crashed (bac=d hard drive) so I set it up as a vm instead. Its using the pfsense vm as a dhcp, which is pushing internet to all devices, not the ltsp clients. Think it might be a issue with setting it up from the start, or the fact that its a vm on a server (From 2003 btw)?
– rvcabc
2 days ago
I can't now but ill update the post with the server specs and vm specs when I can.
– rvcabc
2 days ago