How can two electrons repel if it's impossible for free electrons to absorb or emit energy?












10














There is no acceptable/viable mechanism for a free electron to absorb or emit energy, without violating energy or momentum conservation. So its wavefunction cannot collapse into becoming a particle, right? How do 2 free electrons repel each other then?










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 7




    "There is no known mechanism for free electron to absorb or emit energy"? Who said that?
    – knzhou
    Dec 20 at 0:24










  • @knzhou: it will violate simultaneous conservation of momentum and energy
    – user6760
    Dec 20 at 0:26










  • Free electron can't absorb a photon and can a free particle absorb emit photons
    – user6760
    Dec 20 at 2:49








  • 1




    if your concern is that repelling is cause by the exchange of virtual photons, and a free electron can neither absorb nor emit a photon with violating conversation laws, then don't worry: virtual photons are off shell--they have the energy and momentum required to converse energy and momentum. Unless you are using old fashioned perturbation theory, then energy is violated, but only briefly.
    – JEB
    Dec 20 at 4:55












  • imagine a high energy photon hits an electron at rest, my frame is wavelength becomes longer and electron still remains at rest but from zero-momentum frame photon wavelength remains the same except the electron accelerates? what is this zero-momentum frame? too confuse right now!!!
    – user6760
    Dec 20 at 5:36
















10














There is no acceptable/viable mechanism for a free electron to absorb or emit energy, without violating energy or momentum conservation. So its wavefunction cannot collapse into becoming a particle, right? How do 2 free electrons repel each other then?










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 7




    "There is no known mechanism for free electron to absorb or emit energy"? Who said that?
    – knzhou
    Dec 20 at 0:24










  • @knzhou: it will violate simultaneous conservation of momentum and energy
    – user6760
    Dec 20 at 0:26










  • Free electron can't absorb a photon and can a free particle absorb emit photons
    – user6760
    Dec 20 at 2:49








  • 1




    if your concern is that repelling is cause by the exchange of virtual photons, and a free electron can neither absorb nor emit a photon with violating conversation laws, then don't worry: virtual photons are off shell--they have the energy and momentum required to converse energy and momentum. Unless you are using old fashioned perturbation theory, then energy is violated, but only briefly.
    – JEB
    Dec 20 at 4:55












  • imagine a high energy photon hits an electron at rest, my frame is wavelength becomes longer and electron still remains at rest but from zero-momentum frame photon wavelength remains the same except the electron accelerates? what is this zero-momentum frame? too confuse right now!!!
    – user6760
    Dec 20 at 5:36














10












10








10


4





There is no acceptable/viable mechanism for a free electron to absorb or emit energy, without violating energy or momentum conservation. So its wavefunction cannot collapse into becoming a particle, right? How do 2 free electrons repel each other then?










share|cite|improve this question















There is no acceptable/viable mechanism for a free electron to absorb or emit energy, without violating energy or momentum conservation. So its wavefunction cannot collapse into becoming a particle, right? How do 2 free electrons repel each other then?







electrons wavefunction-collapse






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 20 at 2:59

























asked Dec 20 at 0:20









user6760

2,33011736




2,33011736








  • 7




    "There is no known mechanism for free electron to absorb or emit energy"? Who said that?
    – knzhou
    Dec 20 at 0:24










  • @knzhou: it will violate simultaneous conservation of momentum and energy
    – user6760
    Dec 20 at 0:26










  • Free electron can't absorb a photon and can a free particle absorb emit photons
    – user6760
    Dec 20 at 2:49








  • 1




    if your concern is that repelling is cause by the exchange of virtual photons, and a free electron can neither absorb nor emit a photon with violating conversation laws, then don't worry: virtual photons are off shell--they have the energy and momentum required to converse energy and momentum. Unless you are using old fashioned perturbation theory, then energy is violated, but only briefly.
    – JEB
    Dec 20 at 4:55












  • imagine a high energy photon hits an electron at rest, my frame is wavelength becomes longer and electron still remains at rest but from zero-momentum frame photon wavelength remains the same except the electron accelerates? what is this zero-momentum frame? too confuse right now!!!
    – user6760
    Dec 20 at 5:36














  • 7




    "There is no known mechanism for free electron to absorb or emit energy"? Who said that?
    – knzhou
    Dec 20 at 0:24










  • @knzhou: it will violate simultaneous conservation of momentum and energy
    – user6760
    Dec 20 at 0:26










  • Free electron can't absorb a photon and can a free particle absorb emit photons
    – user6760
    Dec 20 at 2:49








  • 1




    if your concern is that repelling is cause by the exchange of virtual photons, and a free electron can neither absorb nor emit a photon with violating conversation laws, then don't worry: virtual photons are off shell--they have the energy and momentum required to converse energy and momentum. Unless you are using old fashioned perturbation theory, then energy is violated, but only briefly.
    – JEB
    Dec 20 at 4:55












  • imagine a high energy photon hits an electron at rest, my frame is wavelength becomes longer and electron still remains at rest but from zero-momentum frame photon wavelength remains the same except the electron accelerates? what is this zero-momentum frame? too confuse right now!!!
    – user6760
    Dec 20 at 5:36








7




7




"There is no known mechanism for free electron to absorb or emit energy"? Who said that?
– knzhou
Dec 20 at 0:24




"There is no known mechanism for free electron to absorb or emit energy"? Who said that?
– knzhou
Dec 20 at 0:24












@knzhou: it will violate simultaneous conservation of momentum and energy
– user6760
Dec 20 at 0:26




@knzhou: it will violate simultaneous conservation of momentum and energy
– user6760
Dec 20 at 0:26












Free electron can't absorb a photon and can a free particle absorb emit photons
– user6760
Dec 20 at 2:49






Free electron can't absorb a photon and can a free particle absorb emit photons
– user6760
Dec 20 at 2:49






1




1




if your concern is that repelling is cause by the exchange of virtual photons, and a free electron can neither absorb nor emit a photon with violating conversation laws, then don't worry: virtual photons are off shell--they have the energy and momentum required to converse energy and momentum. Unless you are using old fashioned perturbation theory, then energy is violated, but only briefly.
– JEB
Dec 20 at 4:55






if your concern is that repelling is cause by the exchange of virtual photons, and a free electron can neither absorb nor emit a photon with violating conversation laws, then don't worry: virtual photons are off shell--they have the energy and momentum required to converse energy and momentum. Unless you are using old fashioned perturbation theory, then energy is violated, but only briefly.
– JEB
Dec 20 at 4:55














imagine a high energy photon hits an electron at rest, my frame is wavelength becomes longer and electron still remains at rest but from zero-momentum frame photon wavelength remains the same except the electron accelerates? what is this zero-momentum frame? too confuse right now!!!
– user6760
Dec 20 at 5:36




imagine a high energy photon hits an electron at rest, my frame is wavelength becomes longer and electron still remains at rest but from zero-momentum frame photon wavelength remains the same except the electron accelerates? what is this zero-momentum frame? too confuse right now!!!
– user6760
Dec 20 at 5:36










5 Answers
5






active

oldest

votes


















19














It is true that the reactions
$$e + gamma to e, quad e to e + gamma$$
cannot occur without violating energy or momentum conservation. But that doesn't mean that electrons can't interact with anything! For example, scattering
$$e + gamma to e + gamma$$
is perfectly allowed. And a classical electromagnetic field is built out of many photons, so the interaction of an electron with such a field can be thought of as an interaction with many photons at once. There are plenty of ways a free electron can interact without violating energy or momentum conservation, so there's no problem here.






share|cite|improve this answer





























    5














    To resolve this paradox requires study of time dependent perturbation theory; solving Schrodinger's equation with a time dependent perturbation corresponding to the interaction time of two particles.



    If you do this you arrive at the following conclusions:



    A single free electron cannot absorb a free photon ( $e + gamma to e$ is not a valid interaction)



    A single free electron cannot emit a free photon ( $e to e + gamma$ is not a valid interaction)



    However, two electrons can scatter by exchange of energy ( $ e + e to e + e$ is a valid interaction)



    In this later case it is common to refer to this process being due to exchange of "a virtual photon" between the two electrons. But this is just a description of the calculation of time dependent perturbation theory.






    share|cite|improve this answer





























      3














      Your first statement is false: energy can indeed be added at will to electrons by accelerating them with electrostatic charge distributions, as for example in the case of rapidly varying radio frequency (electromagnetic) fields. Neither energy nor momentum conservation is violated in this case. Search on SLAC for more details about this.



      Your other questions are unclear. I recommend you do the search, read a bit, and return here if you have further questions.






      share|cite|improve this answer

















      • 1




        i know when electron in an atom absorb energy it becomes excited, as it goes from excited to lower state energy is being released as photon and in ur case it is radiowave. However I'm at a loss when I try imagine 2 free electrons (particle/wave) can repell each other?
        – user6760
        Dec 20 at 2:38










      • @user6760 The free electron can also gain energy from photon. That also leads to a measurement problem.
        – Bill Alsept
        Dec 20 at 3:20






      • 1




        @BillAlsept: I'm referring to free electron not valence electron
        – user6760
        Dec 20 at 3:25










      • @user6760 if you fire free electrons through a double slit experiment and try to observe them, the photons will physically interfere.
        – Bill Alsept
        Dec 20 at 4:01












      • @BillAlsept: of course 1 free electron interacts with one atom
        – user6760
        Dec 20 at 4:08



















      3














      Basically, because the process doesn't simultaneously conserve energy and momentum; this is why we say that it's mediated by a virtual photon.



      In more technical language, this means that the photons that are exchanged between two interacting electrons are allowed to be "off shell", where the "shell" is the relationship $E^2 = p^2c^2$ (for a massless particle). Real particles are required to be on-shell, but virtual particles are allowed to stray from that condition, at least by some amount.



      In the Feynman-diagram description of the scattering between two electrons you often find diagrams where one electron emits a photon which is then absorbed by the other; this is a virtual photon and as such both the 'emission' and 'absorption' processes are exempt from these considerations.



      As always, though, it bears repeating that Feynman diagrams are calculational tools, and none of the virtual particles that appear in those diagrams actually physically exist in any definable sense. The fact that the 'emission' and 'absorption' processes, as well as the virtual photon itself, seem to defy energy or momentum conservation is purely a quirk of the way in which we've chosen to interpret limited chunks of our calculation.






      share|cite|improve this answer





























        1














        Let me start with a simple counter-question. How a free electron in a laser cooling process loses kinetic energy? The photon, hitting the compliant electron, gets absorbed and after is re-emitted with a higher frequency (with a higher energy content).




        There is no acceptable/viable mechanism for a free electron to absorb or emit energy,...




        There is. Photons are indivisible particles only between their emission and absorption. And the term photons is a summary for a class of particles over all possible frequencies (energy contents). So the re-emission of a photon mostly happens not with the same frequency as the absorbed photon.



        So I rewrite the equation from another answer to an interaction between the electron and the photon:



        $$e + gamma equiv e leftrightarrow (gamma_1 + gamma_2) to (e + gamma_1) + gamma_2 $$




        How do 2 free electrons repel each other then?




        Beside explanations with virtual photons another explanation is that for equaly charged particles the fields do not exchange energy but work like springs. The electric fields get deformed like springs and get relaxed after by pushing the particles back. But the particles lose meanwhile some amount of their kinetic energy (in relation to each over) by emitting photons. You remember, any acceleration is accompanied by photon emission.






        share|cite|improve this answer























          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "151"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f449431%2fhow-can-two-electrons-repel-if-its-impossible-for-free-electrons-to-absorb-or-e%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          5 Answers
          5






          active

          oldest

          votes








          5 Answers
          5






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          19














          It is true that the reactions
          $$e + gamma to e, quad e to e + gamma$$
          cannot occur without violating energy or momentum conservation. But that doesn't mean that electrons can't interact with anything! For example, scattering
          $$e + gamma to e + gamma$$
          is perfectly allowed. And a classical electromagnetic field is built out of many photons, so the interaction of an electron with such a field can be thought of as an interaction with many photons at once. There are plenty of ways a free electron can interact without violating energy or momentum conservation, so there's no problem here.






          share|cite|improve this answer


























            19














            It is true that the reactions
            $$e + gamma to e, quad e to e + gamma$$
            cannot occur without violating energy or momentum conservation. But that doesn't mean that electrons can't interact with anything! For example, scattering
            $$e + gamma to e + gamma$$
            is perfectly allowed. And a classical electromagnetic field is built out of many photons, so the interaction of an electron with such a field can be thought of as an interaction with many photons at once. There are plenty of ways a free electron can interact without violating energy or momentum conservation, so there's no problem here.






            share|cite|improve this answer
























              19












              19








              19






              It is true that the reactions
              $$e + gamma to e, quad e to e + gamma$$
              cannot occur without violating energy or momentum conservation. But that doesn't mean that electrons can't interact with anything! For example, scattering
              $$e + gamma to e + gamma$$
              is perfectly allowed. And a classical electromagnetic field is built out of many photons, so the interaction of an electron with such a field can be thought of as an interaction with many photons at once. There are plenty of ways a free electron can interact without violating energy or momentum conservation, so there's no problem here.






              share|cite|improve this answer












              It is true that the reactions
              $$e + gamma to e, quad e to e + gamma$$
              cannot occur without violating energy or momentum conservation. But that doesn't mean that electrons can't interact with anything! For example, scattering
              $$e + gamma to e + gamma$$
              is perfectly allowed. And a classical electromagnetic field is built out of many photons, so the interaction of an electron with such a field can be thought of as an interaction with many photons at once. There are plenty of ways a free electron can interact without violating energy or momentum conservation, so there's no problem here.







              share|cite|improve this answer












              share|cite|improve this answer



              share|cite|improve this answer










              answered Dec 20 at 0:33









              knzhou

              41.2k11117199




              41.2k11117199























                  5














                  To resolve this paradox requires study of time dependent perturbation theory; solving Schrodinger's equation with a time dependent perturbation corresponding to the interaction time of two particles.



                  If you do this you arrive at the following conclusions:



                  A single free electron cannot absorb a free photon ( $e + gamma to e$ is not a valid interaction)



                  A single free electron cannot emit a free photon ( $e to e + gamma$ is not a valid interaction)



                  However, two electrons can scatter by exchange of energy ( $ e + e to e + e$ is a valid interaction)



                  In this later case it is common to refer to this process being due to exchange of "a virtual photon" between the two electrons. But this is just a description of the calculation of time dependent perturbation theory.






                  share|cite|improve this answer


























                    5














                    To resolve this paradox requires study of time dependent perturbation theory; solving Schrodinger's equation with a time dependent perturbation corresponding to the interaction time of two particles.



                    If you do this you arrive at the following conclusions:



                    A single free electron cannot absorb a free photon ( $e + gamma to e$ is not a valid interaction)



                    A single free electron cannot emit a free photon ( $e to e + gamma$ is not a valid interaction)



                    However, two electrons can scatter by exchange of energy ( $ e + e to e + e$ is a valid interaction)



                    In this later case it is common to refer to this process being due to exchange of "a virtual photon" between the two electrons. But this is just a description of the calculation of time dependent perturbation theory.






                    share|cite|improve this answer
























                      5












                      5








                      5






                      To resolve this paradox requires study of time dependent perturbation theory; solving Schrodinger's equation with a time dependent perturbation corresponding to the interaction time of two particles.



                      If you do this you arrive at the following conclusions:



                      A single free electron cannot absorb a free photon ( $e + gamma to e$ is not a valid interaction)



                      A single free electron cannot emit a free photon ( $e to e + gamma$ is not a valid interaction)



                      However, two electrons can scatter by exchange of energy ( $ e + e to e + e$ is a valid interaction)



                      In this later case it is common to refer to this process being due to exchange of "a virtual photon" between the two electrons. But this is just a description of the calculation of time dependent perturbation theory.






                      share|cite|improve this answer












                      To resolve this paradox requires study of time dependent perturbation theory; solving Schrodinger's equation with a time dependent perturbation corresponding to the interaction time of two particles.



                      If you do this you arrive at the following conclusions:



                      A single free electron cannot absorb a free photon ( $e + gamma to e$ is not a valid interaction)



                      A single free electron cannot emit a free photon ( $e to e + gamma$ is not a valid interaction)



                      However, two electrons can scatter by exchange of energy ( $ e + e to e + e$ is a valid interaction)



                      In this later case it is common to refer to this process being due to exchange of "a virtual photon" between the two electrons. But this is just a description of the calculation of time dependent perturbation theory.







                      share|cite|improve this answer












                      share|cite|improve this answer



                      share|cite|improve this answer










                      answered Dec 20 at 3:43









                      Bruce Greetham

                      1,2501416




                      1,2501416























                          3














                          Your first statement is false: energy can indeed be added at will to electrons by accelerating them with electrostatic charge distributions, as for example in the case of rapidly varying radio frequency (electromagnetic) fields. Neither energy nor momentum conservation is violated in this case. Search on SLAC for more details about this.



                          Your other questions are unclear. I recommend you do the search, read a bit, and return here if you have further questions.






                          share|cite|improve this answer

















                          • 1




                            i know when electron in an atom absorb energy it becomes excited, as it goes from excited to lower state energy is being released as photon and in ur case it is radiowave. However I'm at a loss when I try imagine 2 free electrons (particle/wave) can repell each other?
                            – user6760
                            Dec 20 at 2:38










                          • @user6760 The free electron can also gain energy from photon. That also leads to a measurement problem.
                            – Bill Alsept
                            Dec 20 at 3:20






                          • 1




                            @BillAlsept: I'm referring to free electron not valence electron
                            – user6760
                            Dec 20 at 3:25










                          • @user6760 if you fire free electrons through a double slit experiment and try to observe them, the photons will physically interfere.
                            – Bill Alsept
                            Dec 20 at 4:01












                          • @BillAlsept: of course 1 free electron interacts with one atom
                            – user6760
                            Dec 20 at 4:08
















                          3














                          Your first statement is false: energy can indeed be added at will to electrons by accelerating them with electrostatic charge distributions, as for example in the case of rapidly varying radio frequency (electromagnetic) fields. Neither energy nor momentum conservation is violated in this case. Search on SLAC for more details about this.



                          Your other questions are unclear. I recommend you do the search, read a bit, and return here if you have further questions.






                          share|cite|improve this answer

















                          • 1




                            i know when electron in an atom absorb energy it becomes excited, as it goes from excited to lower state energy is being released as photon and in ur case it is radiowave. However I'm at a loss when I try imagine 2 free electrons (particle/wave) can repell each other?
                            – user6760
                            Dec 20 at 2:38










                          • @user6760 The free electron can also gain energy from photon. That also leads to a measurement problem.
                            – Bill Alsept
                            Dec 20 at 3:20






                          • 1




                            @BillAlsept: I'm referring to free electron not valence electron
                            – user6760
                            Dec 20 at 3:25










                          • @user6760 if you fire free electrons through a double slit experiment and try to observe them, the photons will physically interfere.
                            – Bill Alsept
                            Dec 20 at 4:01












                          • @BillAlsept: of course 1 free electron interacts with one atom
                            – user6760
                            Dec 20 at 4:08














                          3












                          3








                          3






                          Your first statement is false: energy can indeed be added at will to electrons by accelerating them with electrostatic charge distributions, as for example in the case of rapidly varying radio frequency (electromagnetic) fields. Neither energy nor momentum conservation is violated in this case. Search on SLAC for more details about this.



                          Your other questions are unclear. I recommend you do the search, read a bit, and return here if you have further questions.






                          share|cite|improve this answer












                          Your first statement is false: energy can indeed be added at will to electrons by accelerating them with electrostatic charge distributions, as for example in the case of rapidly varying radio frequency (electromagnetic) fields. Neither energy nor momentum conservation is violated in this case. Search on SLAC for more details about this.



                          Your other questions are unclear. I recommend you do the search, read a bit, and return here if you have further questions.







                          share|cite|improve this answer












                          share|cite|improve this answer



                          share|cite|improve this answer










                          answered Dec 20 at 1:55









                          niels nielsen

                          15.8k42651




                          15.8k42651








                          • 1




                            i know when electron in an atom absorb energy it becomes excited, as it goes from excited to lower state energy is being released as photon and in ur case it is radiowave. However I'm at a loss when I try imagine 2 free electrons (particle/wave) can repell each other?
                            – user6760
                            Dec 20 at 2:38










                          • @user6760 The free electron can also gain energy from photon. That also leads to a measurement problem.
                            – Bill Alsept
                            Dec 20 at 3:20






                          • 1




                            @BillAlsept: I'm referring to free electron not valence electron
                            – user6760
                            Dec 20 at 3:25










                          • @user6760 if you fire free electrons through a double slit experiment and try to observe them, the photons will physically interfere.
                            – Bill Alsept
                            Dec 20 at 4:01












                          • @BillAlsept: of course 1 free electron interacts with one atom
                            – user6760
                            Dec 20 at 4:08














                          • 1




                            i know when electron in an atom absorb energy it becomes excited, as it goes from excited to lower state energy is being released as photon and in ur case it is radiowave. However I'm at a loss when I try imagine 2 free electrons (particle/wave) can repell each other?
                            – user6760
                            Dec 20 at 2:38










                          • @user6760 The free electron can also gain energy from photon. That also leads to a measurement problem.
                            – Bill Alsept
                            Dec 20 at 3:20






                          • 1




                            @BillAlsept: I'm referring to free electron not valence electron
                            – user6760
                            Dec 20 at 3:25










                          • @user6760 if you fire free electrons through a double slit experiment and try to observe them, the photons will physically interfere.
                            – Bill Alsept
                            Dec 20 at 4:01












                          • @BillAlsept: of course 1 free electron interacts with one atom
                            – user6760
                            Dec 20 at 4:08








                          1




                          1




                          i know when electron in an atom absorb energy it becomes excited, as it goes from excited to lower state energy is being released as photon and in ur case it is radiowave. However I'm at a loss when I try imagine 2 free electrons (particle/wave) can repell each other?
                          – user6760
                          Dec 20 at 2:38




                          i know when electron in an atom absorb energy it becomes excited, as it goes from excited to lower state energy is being released as photon and in ur case it is radiowave. However I'm at a loss when I try imagine 2 free electrons (particle/wave) can repell each other?
                          – user6760
                          Dec 20 at 2:38












                          @user6760 The free electron can also gain energy from photon. That also leads to a measurement problem.
                          – Bill Alsept
                          Dec 20 at 3:20




                          @user6760 The free electron can also gain energy from photon. That also leads to a measurement problem.
                          – Bill Alsept
                          Dec 20 at 3:20




                          1




                          1




                          @BillAlsept: I'm referring to free electron not valence electron
                          – user6760
                          Dec 20 at 3:25




                          @BillAlsept: I'm referring to free electron not valence electron
                          – user6760
                          Dec 20 at 3:25












                          @user6760 if you fire free electrons through a double slit experiment and try to observe them, the photons will physically interfere.
                          – Bill Alsept
                          Dec 20 at 4:01






                          @user6760 if you fire free electrons through a double slit experiment and try to observe them, the photons will physically interfere.
                          – Bill Alsept
                          Dec 20 at 4:01














                          @BillAlsept: of course 1 free electron interacts with one atom
                          – user6760
                          Dec 20 at 4:08




                          @BillAlsept: of course 1 free electron interacts with one atom
                          – user6760
                          Dec 20 at 4:08











                          3














                          Basically, because the process doesn't simultaneously conserve energy and momentum; this is why we say that it's mediated by a virtual photon.



                          In more technical language, this means that the photons that are exchanged between two interacting electrons are allowed to be "off shell", where the "shell" is the relationship $E^2 = p^2c^2$ (for a massless particle). Real particles are required to be on-shell, but virtual particles are allowed to stray from that condition, at least by some amount.



                          In the Feynman-diagram description of the scattering between two electrons you often find diagrams where one electron emits a photon which is then absorbed by the other; this is a virtual photon and as such both the 'emission' and 'absorption' processes are exempt from these considerations.



                          As always, though, it bears repeating that Feynman diagrams are calculational tools, and none of the virtual particles that appear in those diagrams actually physically exist in any definable sense. The fact that the 'emission' and 'absorption' processes, as well as the virtual photon itself, seem to defy energy or momentum conservation is purely a quirk of the way in which we've chosen to interpret limited chunks of our calculation.






                          share|cite|improve this answer


























                            3














                            Basically, because the process doesn't simultaneously conserve energy and momentum; this is why we say that it's mediated by a virtual photon.



                            In more technical language, this means that the photons that are exchanged between two interacting electrons are allowed to be "off shell", where the "shell" is the relationship $E^2 = p^2c^2$ (for a massless particle). Real particles are required to be on-shell, but virtual particles are allowed to stray from that condition, at least by some amount.



                            In the Feynman-diagram description of the scattering between two electrons you often find diagrams where one electron emits a photon which is then absorbed by the other; this is a virtual photon and as such both the 'emission' and 'absorption' processes are exempt from these considerations.



                            As always, though, it bears repeating that Feynman diagrams are calculational tools, and none of the virtual particles that appear in those diagrams actually physically exist in any definable sense. The fact that the 'emission' and 'absorption' processes, as well as the virtual photon itself, seem to defy energy or momentum conservation is purely a quirk of the way in which we've chosen to interpret limited chunks of our calculation.






                            share|cite|improve this answer
























                              3












                              3








                              3






                              Basically, because the process doesn't simultaneously conserve energy and momentum; this is why we say that it's mediated by a virtual photon.



                              In more technical language, this means that the photons that are exchanged between two interacting electrons are allowed to be "off shell", where the "shell" is the relationship $E^2 = p^2c^2$ (for a massless particle). Real particles are required to be on-shell, but virtual particles are allowed to stray from that condition, at least by some amount.



                              In the Feynman-diagram description of the scattering between two electrons you often find diagrams where one electron emits a photon which is then absorbed by the other; this is a virtual photon and as such both the 'emission' and 'absorption' processes are exempt from these considerations.



                              As always, though, it bears repeating that Feynman diagrams are calculational tools, and none of the virtual particles that appear in those diagrams actually physically exist in any definable sense. The fact that the 'emission' and 'absorption' processes, as well as the virtual photon itself, seem to defy energy or momentum conservation is purely a quirk of the way in which we've chosen to interpret limited chunks of our calculation.






                              share|cite|improve this answer












                              Basically, because the process doesn't simultaneously conserve energy and momentum; this is why we say that it's mediated by a virtual photon.



                              In more technical language, this means that the photons that are exchanged between two interacting electrons are allowed to be "off shell", where the "shell" is the relationship $E^2 = p^2c^2$ (for a massless particle). Real particles are required to be on-shell, but virtual particles are allowed to stray from that condition, at least by some amount.



                              In the Feynman-diagram description of the scattering between two electrons you often find diagrams where one electron emits a photon which is then absorbed by the other; this is a virtual photon and as such both the 'emission' and 'absorption' processes are exempt from these considerations.



                              As always, though, it bears repeating that Feynman diagrams are calculational tools, and none of the virtual particles that appear in those diagrams actually physically exist in any definable sense. The fact that the 'emission' and 'absorption' processes, as well as the virtual photon itself, seem to defy energy or momentum conservation is purely a quirk of the way in which we've chosen to interpret limited chunks of our calculation.







                              share|cite|improve this answer












                              share|cite|improve this answer



                              share|cite|improve this answer










                              answered Dec 20 at 4:12









                              Emilio Pisanty

                              81.8k21197407




                              81.8k21197407























                                  1














                                  Let me start with a simple counter-question. How a free electron in a laser cooling process loses kinetic energy? The photon, hitting the compliant electron, gets absorbed and after is re-emitted with a higher frequency (with a higher energy content).




                                  There is no acceptable/viable mechanism for a free electron to absorb or emit energy,...




                                  There is. Photons are indivisible particles only between their emission and absorption. And the term photons is a summary for a class of particles over all possible frequencies (energy contents). So the re-emission of a photon mostly happens not with the same frequency as the absorbed photon.



                                  So I rewrite the equation from another answer to an interaction between the electron and the photon:



                                  $$e + gamma equiv e leftrightarrow (gamma_1 + gamma_2) to (e + gamma_1) + gamma_2 $$




                                  How do 2 free electrons repel each other then?




                                  Beside explanations with virtual photons another explanation is that for equaly charged particles the fields do not exchange energy but work like springs. The electric fields get deformed like springs and get relaxed after by pushing the particles back. But the particles lose meanwhile some amount of their kinetic energy (in relation to each over) by emitting photons. You remember, any acceleration is accompanied by photon emission.






                                  share|cite|improve this answer




























                                    1














                                    Let me start with a simple counter-question. How a free electron in a laser cooling process loses kinetic energy? The photon, hitting the compliant electron, gets absorbed and after is re-emitted with a higher frequency (with a higher energy content).




                                    There is no acceptable/viable mechanism for a free electron to absorb or emit energy,...




                                    There is. Photons are indivisible particles only between their emission and absorption. And the term photons is a summary for a class of particles over all possible frequencies (energy contents). So the re-emission of a photon mostly happens not with the same frequency as the absorbed photon.



                                    So I rewrite the equation from another answer to an interaction between the electron and the photon:



                                    $$e + gamma equiv e leftrightarrow (gamma_1 + gamma_2) to (e + gamma_1) + gamma_2 $$




                                    How do 2 free electrons repel each other then?




                                    Beside explanations with virtual photons another explanation is that for equaly charged particles the fields do not exchange energy but work like springs. The electric fields get deformed like springs and get relaxed after by pushing the particles back. But the particles lose meanwhile some amount of their kinetic energy (in relation to each over) by emitting photons. You remember, any acceleration is accompanied by photon emission.






                                    share|cite|improve this answer


























                                      1












                                      1








                                      1






                                      Let me start with a simple counter-question. How a free electron in a laser cooling process loses kinetic energy? The photon, hitting the compliant electron, gets absorbed and after is re-emitted with a higher frequency (with a higher energy content).




                                      There is no acceptable/viable mechanism for a free electron to absorb or emit energy,...




                                      There is. Photons are indivisible particles only between their emission and absorption. And the term photons is a summary for a class of particles over all possible frequencies (energy contents). So the re-emission of a photon mostly happens not with the same frequency as the absorbed photon.



                                      So I rewrite the equation from another answer to an interaction between the electron and the photon:



                                      $$e + gamma equiv e leftrightarrow (gamma_1 + gamma_2) to (e + gamma_1) + gamma_2 $$




                                      How do 2 free electrons repel each other then?




                                      Beside explanations with virtual photons another explanation is that for equaly charged particles the fields do not exchange energy but work like springs. The electric fields get deformed like springs and get relaxed after by pushing the particles back. But the particles lose meanwhile some amount of their kinetic energy (in relation to each over) by emitting photons. You remember, any acceleration is accompanied by photon emission.






                                      share|cite|improve this answer














                                      Let me start with a simple counter-question. How a free electron in a laser cooling process loses kinetic energy? The photon, hitting the compliant electron, gets absorbed and after is re-emitted with a higher frequency (with a higher energy content).




                                      There is no acceptable/viable mechanism for a free electron to absorb or emit energy,...




                                      There is. Photons are indivisible particles only between their emission and absorption. And the term photons is a summary for a class of particles over all possible frequencies (energy contents). So the re-emission of a photon mostly happens not with the same frequency as the absorbed photon.



                                      So I rewrite the equation from another answer to an interaction between the electron and the photon:



                                      $$e + gamma equiv e leftrightarrow (gamma_1 + gamma_2) to (e + gamma_1) + gamma_2 $$




                                      How do 2 free electrons repel each other then?




                                      Beside explanations with virtual photons another explanation is that for equaly charged particles the fields do not exchange energy but work like springs. The electric fields get deformed like springs and get relaxed after by pushing the particles back. But the particles lose meanwhile some amount of their kinetic energy (in relation to each over) by emitting photons. You remember, any acceleration is accompanied by photon emission.







                                      share|cite|improve this answer














                                      share|cite|improve this answer



                                      share|cite|improve this answer








                                      edited Dec 21 at 14:58

























                                      answered Dec 21 at 5:47









                                      HolgerFiedler

                                      4,15231133




                                      4,15231133






























                                          draft saved

                                          draft discarded




















































                                          Thanks for contributing an answer to Physics Stack Exchange!


                                          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                          But avoid



                                          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                                          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                                          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                                          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                          But avoid



                                          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                          draft saved


                                          draft discarded














                                          StackExchange.ready(
                                          function () {
                                          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f449431%2fhow-can-two-electrons-repel-if-its-impossible-for-free-electrons-to-absorb-or-e%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                          }
                                          );

                                          Post as a guest















                                          Required, but never shown





















































                                          Required, but never shown














                                          Required, but never shown












                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Required, but never shown

































                                          Required, but never shown














                                          Required, but never shown












                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Popular posts from this blog

                                          數位音樂下載

                                          When can things happen in Etherscan, such as the picture below?

                                          格利澤436b