Why is it wrong to use chillax?





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}






up vote
1
down vote

favorite












I marked a student down for using the word chillax as I believed it to not be a word. Later on they approach me on the issue and show me that it is indeed in the dictionary.



Every fiber of my being screams that it shouldn't be used. Even this site underlines the word saying it's not correct.



According to all dictionary entries I've seen it's not even listed as slang, only informal.



What is a valid reason that chillax shouldn't be used?



Perhaps because it's informal but that doesn't seem like a valid reason as there are plenty of informal words that are quite common and I wouldn't think to mark them down for words such as phone or kids.










share|improve this question


















  • 1




    This site does not mark chillax as incorrect, as far as I can see. My spellchecker does, but that's because spellcheckers are behind the times.
    – Matt E. Эллен
    Sep 9 '15 at 11:49






  • 3




    Robusto's answer is spot on. While you may be able to find some argument based on context, most likely the usage is fine. Use your mistake as a lesson opportunity.
    – samuelesque
    Sep 9 '15 at 12:20








  • 1




    Presumably this was not a math assignment: "Can I split x into two factors? Chillax, Dude! x is not a prime number!"
    – GEdgar
    Sep 9 '15 at 13:32






  • 1




    You're not alone...I hate the word too...and I'm unrepentant on this. I don't know why, there's just something about it that grinds my gears. I agree with Robusto...its a matter of appropriateness. What was the topic for writing?
    – michael_timofeev
    Sep 9 '15 at 15:47






  • 1




    Note that the word is incredibly "young". One online dictionary records it's first known use as 1999. As such, even in the best of circumstances it must be considered "slang" -- appropriate only in text that is attempting to reproduce vernacular speech.
    – Hot Licks
    Sep 9 '15 at 18:36

















up vote
1
down vote

favorite












I marked a student down for using the word chillax as I believed it to not be a word. Later on they approach me on the issue and show me that it is indeed in the dictionary.



Every fiber of my being screams that it shouldn't be used. Even this site underlines the word saying it's not correct.



According to all dictionary entries I've seen it's not even listed as slang, only informal.



What is a valid reason that chillax shouldn't be used?



Perhaps because it's informal but that doesn't seem like a valid reason as there are plenty of informal words that are quite common and I wouldn't think to mark them down for words such as phone or kids.










share|improve this question


















  • 1




    This site does not mark chillax as incorrect, as far as I can see. My spellchecker does, but that's because spellcheckers are behind the times.
    – Matt E. Эллен
    Sep 9 '15 at 11:49






  • 3




    Robusto's answer is spot on. While you may be able to find some argument based on context, most likely the usage is fine. Use your mistake as a lesson opportunity.
    – samuelesque
    Sep 9 '15 at 12:20








  • 1




    Presumably this was not a math assignment: "Can I split x into two factors? Chillax, Dude! x is not a prime number!"
    – GEdgar
    Sep 9 '15 at 13:32






  • 1




    You're not alone...I hate the word too...and I'm unrepentant on this. I don't know why, there's just something about it that grinds my gears. I agree with Robusto...its a matter of appropriateness. What was the topic for writing?
    – michael_timofeev
    Sep 9 '15 at 15:47






  • 1




    Note that the word is incredibly "young". One online dictionary records it's first known use as 1999. As such, even in the best of circumstances it must be considered "slang" -- appropriate only in text that is attempting to reproduce vernacular speech.
    – Hot Licks
    Sep 9 '15 at 18:36













up vote
1
down vote

favorite









up vote
1
down vote

favorite











I marked a student down for using the word chillax as I believed it to not be a word. Later on they approach me on the issue and show me that it is indeed in the dictionary.



Every fiber of my being screams that it shouldn't be used. Even this site underlines the word saying it's not correct.



According to all dictionary entries I've seen it's not even listed as slang, only informal.



What is a valid reason that chillax shouldn't be used?



Perhaps because it's informal but that doesn't seem like a valid reason as there are plenty of informal words that are quite common and I wouldn't think to mark them down for words such as phone or kids.










share|improve this question













I marked a student down for using the word chillax as I believed it to not be a word. Later on they approach me on the issue and show me that it is indeed in the dictionary.



Every fiber of my being screams that it shouldn't be used. Even this site underlines the word saying it's not correct.



According to all dictionary entries I've seen it's not even listed as slang, only informal.



What is a valid reason that chillax shouldn't be used?



Perhaps because it's informal but that doesn't seem like a valid reason as there are plenty of informal words that are quite common and I wouldn't think to mark them down for words such as phone or kids.







word-usage






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Sep 9 '15 at 11:39









Aequitas

3252416




3252416








  • 1




    This site does not mark chillax as incorrect, as far as I can see. My spellchecker does, but that's because spellcheckers are behind the times.
    – Matt E. Эллен
    Sep 9 '15 at 11:49






  • 3




    Robusto's answer is spot on. While you may be able to find some argument based on context, most likely the usage is fine. Use your mistake as a lesson opportunity.
    – samuelesque
    Sep 9 '15 at 12:20








  • 1




    Presumably this was not a math assignment: "Can I split x into two factors? Chillax, Dude! x is not a prime number!"
    – GEdgar
    Sep 9 '15 at 13:32






  • 1




    You're not alone...I hate the word too...and I'm unrepentant on this. I don't know why, there's just something about it that grinds my gears. I agree with Robusto...its a matter of appropriateness. What was the topic for writing?
    – michael_timofeev
    Sep 9 '15 at 15:47






  • 1




    Note that the word is incredibly "young". One online dictionary records it's first known use as 1999. As such, even in the best of circumstances it must be considered "slang" -- appropriate only in text that is attempting to reproduce vernacular speech.
    – Hot Licks
    Sep 9 '15 at 18:36














  • 1




    This site does not mark chillax as incorrect, as far as I can see. My spellchecker does, but that's because spellcheckers are behind the times.
    – Matt E. Эллен
    Sep 9 '15 at 11:49






  • 3




    Robusto's answer is spot on. While you may be able to find some argument based on context, most likely the usage is fine. Use your mistake as a lesson opportunity.
    – samuelesque
    Sep 9 '15 at 12:20








  • 1




    Presumably this was not a math assignment: "Can I split x into two factors? Chillax, Dude! x is not a prime number!"
    – GEdgar
    Sep 9 '15 at 13:32






  • 1




    You're not alone...I hate the word too...and I'm unrepentant on this. I don't know why, there's just something about it that grinds my gears. I agree with Robusto...its a matter of appropriateness. What was the topic for writing?
    – michael_timofeev
    Sep 9 '15 at 15:47






  • 1




    Note that the word is incredibly "young". One online dictionary records it's first known use as 1999. As such, even in the best of circumstances it must be considered "slang" -- appropriate only in text that is attempting to reproduce vernacular speech.
    – Hot Licks
    Sep 9 '15 at 18:36








1




1




This site does not mark chillax as incorrect, as far as I can see. My spellchecker does, but that's because spellcheckers are behind the times.
– Matt E. Эллен
Sep 9 '15 at 11:49




This site does not mark chillax as incorrect, as far as I can see. My spellchecker does, but that's because spellcheckers are behind the times.
– Matt E. Эллен
Sep 9 '15 at 11:49




3




3




Robusto's answer is spot on. While you may be able to find some argument based on context, most likely the usage is fine. Use your mistake as a lesson opportunity.
– samuelesque
Sep 9 '15 at 12:20






Robusto's answer is spot on. While you may be able to find some argument based on context, most likely the usage is fine. Use your mistake as a lesson opportunity.
– samuelesque
Sep 9 '15 at 12:20






1




1




Presumably this was not a math assignment: "Can I split x into two factors? Chillax, Dude! x is not a prime number!"
– GEdgar
Sep 9 '15 at 13:32




Presumably this was not a math assignment: "Can I split x into two factors? Chillax, Dude! x is not a prime number!"
– GEdgar
Sep 9 '15 at 13:32




1




1




You're not alone...I hate the word too...and I'm unrepentant on this. I don't know why, there's just something about it that grinds my gears. I agree with Robusto...its a matter of appropriateness. What was the topic for writing?
– michael_timofeev
Sep 9 '15 at 15:47




You're not alone...I hate the word too...and I'm unrepentant on this. I don't know why, there's just something about it that grinds my gears. I agree with Robusto...its a matter of appropriateness. What was the topic for writing?
– michael_timofeev
Sep 9 '15 at 15:47




1




1




Note that the word is incredibly "young". One online dictionary records it's first known use as 1999. As such, even in the best of circumstances it must be considered "slang" -- appropriate only in text that is attempting to reproduce vernacular speech.
– Hot Licks
Sep 9 '15 at 18:36




Note that the word is incredibly "young". One online dictionary records it's first known use as 1999. As such, even in the best of circumstances it must be considered "slang" -- appropriate only in text that is attempting to reproduce vernacular speech.
– Hot Licks
Sep 9 '15 at 18:36










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
10
down vote













Language changes over time. New words are added and old ones fall by the wayside. The portmanteau chillax (combining chill, from "chill out," a newish slang term meaning "relax," and relax meaning the same thing) is an example of how a lot of people talk these days.



What you may want to think about is when such a term is appropriate and when it is not. In an academic or scientific paper (excluding linguistics) one would do well to avoid the term altogether; the same applies to legal documents, sober-sided business publications, and so on.



Bear in mind that if your student tells you to "chillax" it's fairly rude, so that is also a case where you might want to suggest it not be used. But you needn't worry that casual use of chillax among peers will rot the students' brains. It won't.



Wallace Stevens, the great American poet, said of modern poetry that "It has to be living, to learn the speech of the place." "Chillax" is an example of living language. Do not feel you have to kill it, because 1) you don't have to, and 2) you can't.






share|improve this answer






























    up vote
    0
    down vote













    I hate the word. There's no fluidity at all when the word is used. It emotes a slang somewhat ghetto feel. I would advise individuals to not use this word unless in a nonprofessional environment to include interviews. With all the wonderful words that we have in language they have to demonize and slam together this word. I sure wish that if this is going to be a trend, they come up with something that flows just a little bit more eloquent off the tongue. I hope my son doesn't use that type of word.






    share|improve this answer








    New contributor




    Ralph Cavallo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.


















      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "97"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f273084%2fwhy-is-it-wrong-to-use-chillax%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes








      up vote
      10
      down vote













      Language changes over time. New words are added and old ones fall by the wayside. The portmanteau chillax (combining chill, from "chill out," a newish slang term meaning "relax," and relax meaning the same thing) is an example of how a lot of people talk these days.



      What you may want to think about is when such a term is appropriate and when it is not. In an academic or scientific paper (excluding linguistics) one would do well to avoid the term altogether; the same applies to legal documents, sober-sided business publications, and so on.



      Bear in mind that if your student tells you to "chillax" it's fairly rude, so that is also a case where you might want to suggest it not be used. But you needn't worry that casual use of chillax among peers will rot the students' brains. It won't.



      Wallace Stevens, the great American poet, said of modern poetry that "It has to be living, to learn the speech of the place." "Chillax" is an example of living language. Do not feel you have to kill it, because 1) you don't have to, and 2) you can't.






      share|improve this answer



























        up vote
        10
        down vote













        Language changes over time. New words are added and old ones fall by the wayside. The portmanteau chillax (combining chill, from "chill out," a newish slang term meaning "relax," and relax meaning the same thing) is an example of how a lot of people talk these days.



        What you may want to think about is when such a term is appropriate and when it is not. In an academic or scientific paper (excluding linguistics) one would do well to avoid the term altogether; the same applies to legal documents, sober-sided business publications, and so on.



        Bear in mind that if your student tells you to "chillax" it's fairly rude, so that is also a case where you might want to suggest it not be used. But you needn't worry that casual use of chillax among peers will rot the students' brains. It won't.



        Wallace Stevens, the great American poet, said of modern poetry that "It has to be living, to learn the speech of the place." "Chillax" is an example of living language. Do not feel you have to kill it, because 1) you don't have to, and 2) you can't.






        share|improve this answer

























          up vote
          10
          down vote










          up vote
          10
          down vote









          Language changes over time. New words are added and old ones fall by the wayside. The portmanteau chillax (combining chill, from "chill out," a newish slang term meaning "relax," and relax meaning the same thing) is an example of how a lot of people talk these days.



          What you may want to think about is when such a term is appropriate and when it is not. In an academic or scientific paper (excluding linguistics) one would do well to avoid the term altogether; the same applies to legal documents, sober-sided business publications, and so on.



          Bear in mind that if your student tells you to "chillax" it's fairly rude, so that is also a case where you might want to suggest it not be used. But you needn't worry that casual use of chillax among peers will rot the students' brains. It won't.



          Wallace Stevens, the great American poet, said of modern poetry that "It has to be living, to learn the speech of the place." "Chillax" is an example of living language. Do not feel you have to kill it, because 1) you don't have to, and 2) you can't.






          share|improve this answer














          Language changes over time. New words are added and old ones fall by the wayside. The portmanteau chillax (combining chill, from "chill out," a newish slang term meaning "relax," and relax meaning the same thing) is an example of how a lot of people talk these days.



          What you may want to think about is when such a term is appropriate and when it is not. In an academic or scientific paper (excluding linguistics) one would do well to avoid the term altogether; the same applies to legal documents, sober-sided business publications, and so on.



          Bear in mind that if your student tells you to "chillax" it's fairly rude, so that is also a case where you might want to suggest it not be used. But you needn't worry that casual use of chillax among peers will rot the students' brains. It won't.



          Wallace Stevens, the great American poet, said of modern poetry that "It has to be living, to learn the speech of the place." "Chillax" is an example of living language. Do not feel you have to kill it, because 1) you don't have to, and 2) you can't.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Sep 11 '15 at 17:10

























          answered Sep 9 '15 at 11:47









          Robusto

          127k27303513




          127k27303513
























              up vote
              0
              down vote













              I hate the word. There's no fluidity at all when the word is used. It emotes a slang somewhat ghetto feel. I would advise individuals to not use this word unless in a nonprofessional environment to include interviews. With all the wonderful words that we have in language they have to demonize and slam together this word. I sure wish that if this is going to be a trend, they come up with something that flows just a little bit more eloquent off the tongue. I hope my son doesn't use that type of word.






              share|improve this answer








              New contributor




              Ralph Cavallo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.






















                up vote
                0
                down vote













                I hate the word. There's no fluidity at all when the word is used. It emotes a slang somewhat ghetto feel. I would advise individuals to not use this word unless in a nonprofessional environment to include interviews. With all the wonderful words that we have in language they have to demonize and slam together this word. I sure wish that if this is going to be a trend, they come up with something that flows just a little bit more eloquent off the tongue. I hope my son doesn't use that type of word.






                share|improve this answer








                New contributor




                Ralph Cavallo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.




















                  up vote
                  0
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  0
                  down vote









                  I hate the word. There's no fluidity at all when the word is used. It emotes a slang somewhat ghetto feel. I would advise individuals to not use this word unless in a nonprofessional environment to include interviews. With all the wonderful words that we have in language they have to demonize and slam together this word. I sure wish that if this is going to be a trend, they come up with something that flows just a little bit more eloquent off the tongue. I hope my son doesn't use that type of word.






                  share|improve this answer








                  New contributor




                  Ralph Cavallo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.









                  I hate the word. There's no fluidity at all when the word is used. It emotes a slang somewhat ghetto feel. I would advise individuals to not use this word unless in a nonprofessional environment to include interviews. With all the wonderful words that we have in language they have to demonize and slam together this word. I sure wish that if this is going to be a trend, they come up with something that flows just a little bit more eloquent off the tongue. I hope my son doesn't use that type of word.







                  share|improve this answer








                  New contributor




                  Ralph Cavallo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.









                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer






                  New contributor




                  Ralph Cavallo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.









                  answered 32 mins ago









                  Ralph Cavallo

                  1




                  1




                  New contributor




                  Ralph Cavallo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.





                  New contributor





                  Ralph Cavallo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.






                  Ralph Cavallo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                      Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                      Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f273084%2fwhy-is-it-wrong-to-use-chillax%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      數位音樂下載

                      When can things happen in Etherscan, such as the picture below?

                      格利澤436b