Trying to mount backup of /dev/sda as ext4 for recovery, fdisk reports invalid partition table
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}
I used dd if=/dev/sda of=~/backup.img where /dev/sda was an ext4 filesystem. I want to perform recovery on it which means I need to mount it as ext4 filesystem using extundelete application. Can anyone help me mount this properly?
Output from dumpe2fs -h:  
dumpe2fs 1.42.5 (29-Jul-2012)  
Filesystem volume name:   DOROOT  
Last mounted on:          /  
Filesystem UUID:          6c4f1456-a5bb-4d1d-afd4-a13d0a1ce63d  
Filesystem magic number:  0xEF53  
Filesystem revision #:    1 (dynamic)  
Filesystem features:      has_journal ext_attr resize_inode dir_index filetype needs_recovery extent flex_bg sparse_super large_file huge_file uninit_bg dir_nlink extra_isize  
Filesystem flags:         signed_directory_hash  
Default mount options:    (none)  
Filesystem state:         clean  
Errors behavior:          Continue  
Filesystem OS type:       Linux  
Inode count:              1310720  
Block count:              5242880  
Reserved block count:     262144  
Free blocks:              4116242  
Free inodes:              1127629  
First block:              0  
Block size:               4096  
Fragment size:            4096  
Reserved GDT blocks:      1022  
Blocks per group:         32768  
Fragments per group:      32768  
Inodes per group:         8192  
Inode blocks per group:   512  
Flex block group size:    16  
Filesystem created:       Thu May  3 16:58:15 2012  
Last mount time:          Sat Jul 13 10:24:27 2013  
Last write time:          Thu Mar 28 12:54:31 2013  
Mount count:              2  
Maximum mount count:      29  
Last checked:             Thu Mar 28 12:54:31 2013  
Check interval:           15552000 (6 months)  
Next check after:         Tue Sep 24 12:54:31 2013  
Lifetime writes:          724 MB  
Reserved blocks uid:      0 (user root)  
Reserved blocks gid:      0 (group root)  
First inode:              11  
Inode size:           256  
Required extra isize:     28  
Desired extra isize:      28  
Journal inode:            8  
Default directory hash:   half_md4  
Directory Hash Seed:      9eb0125c-e592-492e-87ad-aaf42f92061d  
Journal backup:           inode blocks  
Journal features:         journal_incompat_revoke  
Journal size:             128M  
Journal length:           32768  
Journal sequence:         0x0006800e  
Journal start:            23393 
Output from fdisk -lu:  
Disk ssdback: 21.5 GB, 21474836480 bytes  
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 2610 cylinders, total 41943040 sectors  
Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes  
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes  
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes  
Disk identifier: 0x00000000  
Disk ssdback doesn't contain a valid partition table 
Output from df:  
Filesystem      Size  Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda         20G  3.4G   16G  18% /
udev            242M  8.0K  242M   1% /dev
tmpfs            99M  208K   99M   1% /run
none            5.0M     0  5.0M   0% /run/lock
none            246M     0  246M   0% /run/shm
Output from blkid /dev/sda:
/dev/sda: LABEL="DOROOT" UUID="6c4f1456-a5bb-4d1d-afd4-a13d0a1ce63d" TYPE="ext4"
partitioning mount filesystem ext4
add a comment |
I used dd if=/dev/sda of=~/backup.img where /dev/sda was an ext4 filesystem. I want to perform recovery on it which means I need to mount it as ext4 filesystem using extundelete application. Can anyone help me mount this properly?
Output from dumpe2fs -h:  
dumpe2fs 1.42.5 (29-Jul-2012)  
Filesystem volume name:   DOROOT  
Last mounted on:          /  
Filesystem UUID:          6c4f1456-a5bb-4d1d-afd4-a13d0a1ce63d  
Filesystem magic number:  0xEF53  
Filesystem revision #:    1 (dynamic)  
Filesystem features:      has_journal ext_attr resize_inode dir_index filetype needs_recovery extent flex_bg sparse_super large_file huge_file uninit_bg dir_nlink extra_isize  
Filesystem flags:         signed_directory_hash  
Default mount options:    (none)  
Filesystem state:         clean  
Errors behavior:          Continue  
Filesystem OS type:       Linux  
Inode count:              1310720  
Block count:              5242880  
Reserved block count:     262144  
Free blocks:              4116242  
Free inodes:              1127629  
First block:              0  
Block size:               4096  
Fragment size:            4096  
Reserved GDT blocks:      1022  
Blocks per group:         32768  
Fragments per group:      32768  
Inodes per group:         8192  
Inode blocks per group:   512  
Flex block group size:    16  
Filesystem created:       Thu May  3 16:58:15 2012  
Last mount time:          Sat Jul 13 10:24:27 2013  
Last write time:          Thu Mar 28 12:54:31 2013  
Mount count:              2  
Maximum mount count:      29  
Last checked:             Thu Mar 28 12:54:31 2013  
Check interval:           15552000 (6 months)  
Next check after:         Tue Sep 24 12:54:31 2013  
Lifetime writes:          724 MB  
Reserved blocks uid:      0 (user root)  
Reserved blocks gid:      0 (group root)  
First inode:              11  
Inode size:           256  
Required extra isize:     28  
Desired extra isize:      28  
Journal inode:            8  
Default directory hash:   half_md4  
Directory Hash Seed:      9eb0125c-e592-492e-87ad-aaf42f92061d  
Journal backup:           inode blocks  
Journal features:         journal_incompat_revoke  
Journal size:             128M  
Journal length:           32768  
Journal sequence:         0x0006800e  
Journal start:            23393 
Output from fdisk -lu:  
Disk ssdback: 21.5 GB, 21474836480 bytes  
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 2610 cylinders, total 41943040 sectors  
Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes  
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes  
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes  
Disk identifier: 0x00000000  
Disk ssdback doesn't contain a valid partition table 
Output from df:  
Filesystem      Size  Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda         20G  3.4G   16G  18% /
udev            242M  8.0K  242M   1% /dev
tmpfs            99M  208K   99M   1% /run
none            5.0M     0  5.0M   0% /run/lock
none            246M     0  246M   0% /run/shm
Output from blkid /dev/sda:
/dev/sda: LABEL="DOROOT" UUID="6c4f1456-a5bb-4d1d-afd4-a13d0a1ce63d" TYPE="ext4"
partitioning mount filesystem ext4
add a comment |
I used dd if=/dev/sda of=~/backup.img where /dev/sda was an ext4 filesystem. I want to perform recovery on it which means I need to mount it as ext4 filesystem using extundelete application. Can anyone help me mount this properly?
Output from dumpe2fs -h:  
dumpe2fs 1.42.5 (29-Jul-2012)  
Filesystem volume name:   DOROOT  
Last mounted on:          /  
Filesystem UUID:          6c4f1456-a5bb-4d1d-afd4-a13d0a1ce63d  
Filesystem magic number:  0xEF53  
Filesystem revision #:    1 (dynamic)  
Filesystem features:      has_journal ext_attr resize_inode dir_index filetype needs_recovery extent flex_bg sparse_super large_file huge_file uninit_bg dir_nlink extra_isize  
Filesystem flags:         signed_directory_hash  
Default mount options:    (none)  
Filesystem state:         clean  
Errors behavior:          Continue  
Filesystem OS type:       Linux  
Inode count:              1310720  
Block count:              5242880  
Reserved block count:     262144  
Free blocks:              4116242  
Free inodes:              1127629  
First block:              0  
Block size:               4096  
Fragment size:            4096  
Reserved GDT blocks:      1022  
Blocks per group:         32768  
Fragments per group:      32768  
Inodes per group:         8192  
Inode blocks per group:   512  
Flex block group size:    16  
Filesystem created:       Thu May  3 16:58:15 2012  
Last mount time:          Sat Jul 13 10:24:27 2013  
Last write time:          Thu Mar 28 12:54:31 2013  
Mount count:              2  
Maximum mount count:      29  
Last checked:             Thu Mar 28 12:54:31 2013  
Check interval:           15552000 (6 months)  
Next check after:         Tue Sep 24 12:54:31 2013  
Lifetime writes:          724 MB  
Reserved blocks uid:      0 (user root)  
Reserved blocks gid:      0 (group root)  
First inode:              11  
Inode size:           256  
Required extra isize:     28  
Desired extra isize:      28  
Journal inode:            8  
Default directory hash:   half_md4  
Directory Hash Seed:      9eb0125c-e592-492e-87ad-aaf42f92061d  
Journal backup:           inode blocks  
Journal features:         journal_incompat_revoke  
Journal size:             128M  
Journal length:           32768  
Journal sequence:         0x0006800e  
Journal start:            23393 
Output from fdisk -lu:  
Disk ssdback: 21.5 GB, 21474836480 bytes  
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 2610 cylinders, total 41943040 sectors  
Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes  
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes  
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes  
Disk identifier: 0x00000000  
Disk ssdback doesn't contain a valid partition table 
Output from df:  
Filesystem      Size  Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda         20G  3.4G   16G  18% /
udev            242M  8.0K  242M   1% /dev
tmpfs            99M  208K   99M   1% /run
none            5.0M     0  5.0M   0% /run/lock
none            246M     0  246M   0% /run/shm
Output from blkid /dev/sda:
/dev/sda: LABEL="DOROOT" UUID="6c4f1456-a5bb-4d1d-afd4-a13d0a1ce63d" TYPE="ext4"
partitioning mount filesystem ext4
I used dd if=/dev/sda of=~/backup.img where /dev/sda was an ext4 filesystem. I want to perform recovery on it which means I need to mount it as ext4 filesystem using extundelete application. Can anyone help me mount this properly?
Output from dumpe2fs -h:  
dumpe2fs 1.42.5 (29-Jul-2012)  
Filesystem volume name:   DOROOT  
Last mounted on:          /  
Filesystem UUID:          6c4f1456-a5bb-4d1d-afd4-a13d0a1ce63d  
Filesystem magic number:  0xEF53  
Filesystem revision #:    1 (dynamic)  
Filesystem features:      has_journal ext_attr resize_inode dir_index filetype needs_recovery extent flex_bg sparse_super large_file huge_file uninit_bg dir_nlink extra_isize  
Filesystem flags:         signed_directory_hash  
Default mount options:    (none)  
Filesystem state:         clean  
Errors behavior:          Continue  
Filesystem OS type:       Linux  
Inode count:              1310720  
Block count:              5242880  
Reserved block count:     262144  
Free blocks:              4116242  
Free inodes:              1127629  
First block:              0  
Block size:               4096  
Fragment size:            4096  
Reserved GDT blocks:      1022  
Blocks per group:         32768  
Fragments per group:      32768  
Inodes per group:         8192  
Inode blocks per group:   512  
Flex block group size:    16  
Filesystem created:       Thu May  3 16:58:15 2012  
Last mount time:          Sat Jul 13 10:24:27 2013  
Last write time:          Thu Mar 28 12:54:31 2013  
Mount count:              2  
Maximum mount count:      29  
Last checked:             Thu Mar 28 12:54:31 2013  
Check interval:           15552000 (6 months)  
Next check after:         Tue Sep 24 12:54:31 2013  
Lifetime writes:          724 MB  
Reserved blocks uid:      0 (user root)  
Reserved blocks gid:      0 (group root)  
First inode:              11  
Inode size:           256  
Required extra isize:     28  
Desired extra isize:      28  
Journal inode:            8  
Default directory hash:   half_md4  
Directory Hash Seed:      9eb0125c-e592-492e-87ad-aaf42f92061d  
Journal backup:           inode blocks  
Journal features:         journal_incompat_revoke  
Journal size:             128M  
Journal length:           32768  
Journal sequence:         0x0006800e  
Journal start:            23393 
Output from fdisk -lu:  
Disk ssdback: 21.5 GB, 21474836480 bytes  
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 2610 cylinders, total 41943040 sectors  
Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes  
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes  
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes  
Disk identifier: 0x00000000  
Disk ssdback doesn't contain a valid partition table 
Output from df:  
Filesystem      Size  Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda         20G  3.4G   16G  18% /
udev            242M  8.0K  242M   1% /dev
tmpfs            99M  208K   99M   1% /run
none            5.0M     0  5.0M   0% /run/lock
none            246M     0  246M   0% /run/shm
Output from blkid /dev/sda:
/dev/sda: LABEL="DOROOT" UUID="6c4f1456-a5bb-4d1d-afd4-a13d0a1ce63d" TYPE="ext4"
partitioning mount filesystem ext4
partitioning mount filesystem ext4
edited Sep 2 '13 at 16:24
dougvk
asked Sep 1 '13 at 2:40
dougvkdougvk
10113
10113
add a comment |
add a comment |
                                2 Answers
                            2
                        
active
oldest
votes
The dd command you used:
dd if=/dev/sda of=~/backup.img
is for backing up the harddrive(/dev/sda) to your home directory/image.img
isn't that forming a loop.
Did it worked ...??
and for mounting a partition: 
mkdir /media/mountPoint
mount /dev/sda5 /media/mountPoint
Your device will be mounted at /media/mountPoint.
It would not be a loop if there's another physical disk that holds the/homedirectory. If the system has just one physical disk, though, you're right that you'd never be able to create a complete backup usingddin this way.
– Rod Smith
Sep 1 '13 at 17:28
hi user182904, yes I did issue thedd if=/dev/sda of=~/backup.imgcommand
– dougvk
Sep 2 '13 at 16:24
@dougvk If you want to do recover, don't mount it. use this commmand **dd if=~/backup.img of=/dev/sda** NOTE: This command will copy all the data from ~/backup.img and copy to /dev/sda, and if there is important data on /dev/sda, you'll lose it... Use it properly !! If i'm wrong somewhere, pls do tell me ..!! :)
– murarisumit
Sep 3 '13 at 10:32
add a comment |
You say that "/dev/sda was an ext4 filesystem." If this statement is accurate, it means that the entire disk was one filesystem, without a partition table. If so, fdisk will be useless on the disk, because fdisk manipulates partition tables, and your disk has no such data structure. It's valid to create a filesystem on the whole disk in this way, but it's unusual; it's much more common to create a partition table on the disk, even if you intend to use the whole thing as one filesystem. Since you didn't report device filenames with your other commands, it's unclear whether you've actually set things up in this way or if you have some sort of problem. You might be able to figure it out by using blkid, as in:
$ sudo blkid /dev/sda
/dev/sda: UUID="a139b90e-2f94-4378-bf66-fe7669808dbe" TYPE="ext4"
This example shows that /dev/sda does indeed hole a valid ext4 filesystem. You can also look for device files for partitions in /dev, as in:
$ ls /dev/sda*
/dev/sda  /dev/sda1  /dev/sda2  /dev/sda3  /dev/sda4  /dev/sda5
This example, contrary to the earlier one, shows that /dev/sda is partitioned -- that's what the files that end in numbers refer to.
hi, i used the commanddd if=/dev/sda of=~/sda.imgand I edited my above question to include the filesystem layout and other information you requested
– dougvk
Sep 2 '13 at 16:21
add a comment |
                                Your Answer
                            
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "89"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f339903%2ftrying-to-mount-backup-of-dev-sda-as-ext4-for-recovery-fdisk-reports-invalid-p%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
                                2 Answers
                            2
                        
active
oldest
votes
                                2 Answers
                            2
                        
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The dd command you used:
dd if=/dev/sda of=~/backup.img
is for backing up the harddrive(/dev/sda) to your home directory/image.img
isn't that forming a loop.
Did it worked ...??
and for mounting a partition: 
mkdir /media/mountPoint
mount /dev/sda5 /media/mountPoint
Your device will be mounted at /media/mountPoint.
It would not be a loop if there's another physical disk that holds the/homedirectory. If the system has just one physical disk, though, you're right that you'd never be able to create a complete backup usingddin this way.
– Rod Smith
Sep 1 '13 at 17:28
hi user182904, yes I did issue thedd if=/dev/sda of=~/backup.imgcommand
– dougvk
Sep 2 '13 at 16:24
@dougvk If you want to do recover, don't mount it. use this commmand **dd if=~/backup.img of=/dev/sda** NOTE: This command will copy all the data from ~/backup.img and copy to /dev/sda, and if there is important data on /dev/sda, you'll lose it... Use it properly !! If i'm wrong somewhere, pls do tell me ..!! :)
– murarisumit
Sep 3 '13 at 10:32
add a comment |
The dd command you used:
dd if=/dev/sda of=~/backup.img
is for backing up the harddrive(/dev/sda) to your home directory/image.img
isn't that forming a loop.
Did it worked ...??
and for mounting a partition: 
mkdir /media/mountPoint
mount /dev/sda5 /media/mountPoint
Your device will be mounted at /media/mountPoint.
It would not be a loop if there's another physical disk that holds the/homedirectory. If the system has just one physical disk, though, you're right that you'd never be able to create a complete backup usingddin this way.
– Rod Smith
Sep 1 '13 at 17:28
hi user182904, yes I did issue thedd if=/dev/sda of=~/backup.imgcommand
– dougvk
Sep 2 '13 at 16:24
@dougvk If you want to do recover, don't mount it. use this commmand **dd if=~/backup.img of=/dev/sda** NOTE: This command will copy all the data from ~/backup.img and copy to /dev/sda, and if there is important data on /dev/sda, you'll lose it... Use it properly !! If i'm wrong somewhere, pls do tell me ..!! :)
– murarisumit
Sep 3 '13 at 10:32
add a comment |
The dd command you used:
dd if=/dev/sda of=~/backup.img
is for backing up the harddrive(/dev/sda) to your home directory/image.img
isn't that forming a loop.
Did it worked ...??
and for mounting a partition: 
mkdir /media/mountPoint
mount /dev/sda5 /media/mountPoint
Your device will be mounted at /media/mountPoint.
The dd command you used:
dd if=/dev/sda of=~/backup.img
is for backing up the harddrive(/dev/sda) to your home directory/image.img
isn't that forming a loop.
Did it worked ...??
and for mounting a partition: 
mkdir /media/mountPoint
mount /dev/sda5 /media/mountPoint
Your device will be mounted at /media/mountPoint.
answered Sep 1 '13 at 8:53
murarisumitmurarisumit
325112
325112
It would not be a loop if there's another physical disk that holds the/homedirectory. If the system has just one physical disk, though, you're right that you'd never be able to create a complete backup usingddin this way.
– Rod Smith
Sep 1 '13 at 17:28
hi user182904, yes I did issue thedd if=/dev/sda of=~/backup.imgcommand
– dougvk
Sep 2 '13 at 16:24
@dougvk If you want to do recover, don't mount it. use this commmand **dd if=~/backup.img of=/dev/sda** NOTE: This command will copy all the data from ~/backup.img and copy to /dev/sda, and if there is important data on /dev/sda, you'll lose it... Use it properly !! If i'm wrong somewhere, pls do tell me ..!! :)
– murarisumit
Sep 3 '13 at 10:32
add a comment |
It would not be a loop if there's another physical disk that holds the/homedirectory. If the system has just one physical disk, though, you're right that you'd never be able to create a complete backup usingddin this way.
– Rod Smith
Sep 1 '13 at 17:28
hi user182904, yes I did issue thedd if=/dev/sda of=~/backup.imgcommand
– dougvk
Sep 2 '13 at 16:24
@dougvk If you want to do recover, don't mount it. use this commmand **dd if=~/backup.img of=/dev/sda** NOTE: This command will copy all the data from ~/backup.img and copy to /dev/sda, and if there is important data on /dev/sda, you'll lose it... Use it properly !! If i'm wrong somewhere, pls do tell me ..!! :)
– murarisumit
Sep 3 '13 at 10:32
It would not be a loop if there's another physical disk that holds the
/home directory. If the system has just one physical disk, though, you're right that you'd never be able to create a complete backup using dd in this way.– Rod Smith
Sep 1 '13 at 17:28
It would not be a loop if there's another physical disk that holds the
/home directory. If the system has just one physical disk, though, you're right that you'd never be able to create a complete backup using dd in this way.– Rod Smith
Sep 1 '13 at 17:28
hi user182904, yes I did issue the
dd if=/dev/sda of=~/backup.img command– dougvk
Sep 2 '13 at 16:24
hi user182904, yes I did issue the
dd if=/dev/sda of=~/backup.img command– dougvk
Sep 2 '13 at 16:24
@dougvk If you want to do recover, don't mount it. use this commmand **
dd if=~/backup.img of=/dev/sda **  NOTE:   This command will copy all the data from ~/backup.img and copy to /dev/sda, and if there is important data on /dev/sda, you'll lose it... Use it properly !! If i'm wrong somewhere, pls do tell me ..!! :)– murarisumit
Sep 3 '13 at 10:32
@dougvk If you want to do recover, don't mount it. use this commmand **
dd if=~/backup.img of=/dev/sda **  NOTE:   This command will copy all the data from ~/backup.img and copy to /dev/sda, and if there is important data on /dev/sda, you'll lose it... Use it properly !! If i'm wrong somewhere, pls do tell me ..!! :)– murarisumit
Sep 3 '13 at 10:32
add a comment |
You say that "/dev/sda was an ext4 filesystem." If this statement is accurate, it means that the entire disk was one filesystem, without a partition table. If so, fdisk will be useless on the disk, because fdisk manipulates partition tables, and your disk has no such data structure. It's valid to create a filesystem on the whole disk in this way, but it's unusual; it's much more common to create a partition table on the disk, even if you intend to use the whole thing as one filesystem. Since you didn't report device filenames with your other commands, it's unclear whether you've actually set things up in this way or if you have some sort of problem. You might be able to figure it out by using blkid, as in:
$ sudo blkid /dev/sda
/dev/sda: UUID="a139b90e-2f94-4378-bf66-fe7669808dbe" TYPE="ext4"
This example shows that /dev/sda does indeed hole a valid ext4 filesystem. You can also look for device files for partitions in /dev, as in:
$ ls /dev/sda*
/dev/sda  /dev/sda1  /dev/sda2  /dev/sda3  /dev/sda4  /dev/sda5
This example, contrary to the earlier one, shows that /dev/sda is partitioned -- that's what the files that end in numbers refer to.
hi, i used the commanddd if=/dev/sda of=~/sda.imgand I edited my above question to include the filesystem layout and other information you requested
– dougvk
Sep 2 '13 at 16:21
add a comment |
You say that "/dev/sda was an ext4 filesystem." If this statement is accurate, it means that the entire disk was one filesystem, without a partition table. If so, fdisk will be useless on the disk, because fdisk manipulates partition tables, and your disk has no such data structure. It's valid to create a filesystem on the whole disk in this way, but it's unusual; it's much more common to create a partition table on the disk, even if you intend to use the whole thing as one filesystem. Since you didn't report device filenames with your other commands, it's unclear whether you've actually set things up in this way or if you have some sort of problem. You might be able to figure it out by using blkid, as in:
$ sudo blkid /dev/sda
/dev/sda: UUID="a139b90e-2f94-4378-bf66-fe7669808dbe" TYPE="ext4"
This example shows that /dev/sda does indeed hole a valid ext4 filesystem. You can also look for device files for partitions in /dev, as in:
$ ls /dev/sda*
/dev/sda  /dev/sda1  /dev/sda2  /dev/sda3  /dev/sda4  /dev/sda5
This example, contrary to the earlier one, shows that /dev/sda is partitioned -- that's what the files that end in numbers refer to.
hi, i used the commanddd if=/dev/sda of=~/sda.imgand I edited my above question to include the filesystem layout and other information you requested
– dougvk
Sep 2 '13 at 16:21
add a comment |
You say that "/dev/sda was an ext4 filesystem." If this statement is accurate, it means that the entire disk was one filesystem, without a partition table. If so, fdisk will be useless on the disk, because fdisk manipulates partition tables, and your disk has no such data structure. It's valid to create a filesystem on the whole disk in this way, but it's unusual; it's much more common to create a partition table on the disk, even if you intend to use the whole thing as one filesystem. Since you didn't report device filenames with your other commands, it's unclear whether you've actually set things up in this way or if you have some sort of problem. You might be able to figure it out by using blkid, as in:
$ sudo blkid /dev/sda
/dev/sda: UUID="a139b90e-2f94-4378-bf66-fe7669808dbe" TYPE="ext4"
This example shows that /dev/sda does indeed hole a valid ext4 filesystem. You can also look for device files for partitions in /dev, as in:
$ ls /dev/sda*
/dev/sda  /dev/sda1  /dev/sda2  /dev/sda3  /dev/sda4  /dev/sda5
This example, contrary to the earlier one, shows that /dev/sda is partitioned -- that's what the files that end in numbers refer to.
You say that "/dev/sda was an ext4 filesystem." If this statement is accurate, it means that the entire disk was one filesystem, without a partition table. If so, fdisk will be useless on the disk, because fdisk manipulates partition tables, and your disk has no such data structure. It's valid to create a filesystem on the whole disk in this way, but it's unusual; it's much more common to create a partition table on the disk, even if you intend to use the whole thing as one filesystem. Since you didn't report device filenames with your other commands, it's unclear whether you've actually set things up in this way or if you have some sort of problem. You might be able to figure it out by using blkid, as in:
$ sudo blkid /dev/sda
/dev/sda: UUID="a139b90e-2f94-4378-bf66-fe7669808dbe" TYPE="ext4"
This example shows that /dev/sda does indeed hole a valid ext4 filesystem. You can also look for device files for partitions in /dev, as in:
$ ls /dev/sda*
/dev/sda  /dev/sda1  /dev/sda2  /dev/sda3  /dev/sda4  /dev/sda5
This example, contrary to the earlier one, shows that /dev/sda is partitioned -- that's what the files that end in numbers refer to.
answered Sep 1 '13 at 17:27
Rod SmithRod Smith
35.9k44072
35.9k44072
hi, i used the commanddd if=/dev/sda of=~/sda.imgand I edited my above question to include the filesystem layout and other information you requested
– dougvk
Sep 2 '13 at 16:21
add a comment |
hi, i used the commanddd if=/dev/sda of=~/sda.imgand I edited my above question to include the filesystem layout and other information you requested
– dougvk
Sep 2 '13 at 16:21
hi, i used the command
dd if=/dev/sda of=~/sda.img and I edited my above question to include the filesystem layout and other information you requested– dougvk
Sep 2 '13 at 16:21
hi, i used the command
dd if=/dev/sda of=~/sda.img and I edited my above question to include the filesystem layout and other information you requested– dougvk
Sep 2 '13 at 16:21
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Ask Ubuntu!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
 
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
 - Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
 
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f339903%2ftrying-to-mount-backup-of-dev-sda-as-ext4-for-recovery-fdisk-reports-invalid-p%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown