Can “few” be used as a subject? If so, what is the rule?












8















I took a test with the following question:




__________has changed at work since the last employee survey was carried out.


a. Little

b. Some

c. Few.




Now, I know that the correct answer is little, but why specifically can't I use few here? What is the rule for this?



Also, it seems to me that we could make a sentence like




Few have survived fighting polar bears barehanded.




So, could someone kindly explain why we can't use few in the example?










share|improve this question

























  • Your example is fine. What's the difference between it and the test question?

    – Apollys
    1 hour ago


















8















I took a test with the following question:




__________has changed at work since the last employee survey was carried out.


a. Little

b. Some

c. Few.




Now, I know that the correct answer is little, but why specifically can't I use few here? What is the rule for this?



Also, it seems to me that we could make a sentence like




Few have survived fighting polar bears barehanded.




So, could someone kindly explain why we can't use few in the example?










share|improve this question

























  • Your example is fine. What's the difference between it and the test question?

    – Apollys
    1 hour ago
















8












8








8


1






I took a test with the following question:




__________has changed at work since the last employee survey was carried out.


a. Little

b. Some

c. Few.




Now, I know that the correct answer is little, but why specifically can't I use few here? What is the rule for this?



Also, it seems to me that we could make a sentence like




Few have survived fighting polar bears barehanded.




So, could someone kindly explain why we can't use few in the example?










share|improve this question
















I took a test with the following question:




__________has changed at work since the last employee survey was carried out.


a. Little

b. Some

c. Few.




Now, I know that the correct answer is little, but why specifically can't I use few here? What is the rule for this?



Also, it seems to me that we could make a sentence like




Few have survived fighting polar bears barehanded.




So, could someone kindly explain why we can't use few in the example?







determiners






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 7 hours ago









Jasper

18.7k43771




18.7k43771










asked 16 hours ago









BrainDefenestrationBrainDefenestration

534




534













  • Your example is fine. What's the difference between it and the test question?

    – Apollys
    1 hour ago





















  • Your example is fine. What's the difference between it and the test question?

    – Apollys
    1 hour ago



















Your example is fine. What's the difference between it and the test question?

– Apollys
1 hour ago







Your example is fine. What's the difference between it and the test question?

– Apollys
1 hour ago












4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















25














We use "little" for uncountable nouns and "few" for countable nouns.

In your sentence




Little has changed at work since the last employee survey was carried out.




The general situation has changed a bit. And "general situation" is an uncountable noun, therefore "little" is correct.



In your second sentence




Few have survived fighting polar bears barehanded.




"Few have survived" implies few people have survived, and you can count people.






share|improve this answer

































    5














    This sentence would work:




    Few have changed at work since the last employee survey was carried out.




    The difference is that few requires a plural verb form. Few has is ungrammatical, but few have is fine.





    Note the subtle difference in meaning based on the words that could be implied to exist but that have been left out:




    Little [of anything] has changed at work since the last employee survey was carried out.




    Versus:




    Few [people / things] have changed at work since the last employee survey was carried out.




    The subject goes from something general to something more specific.





    However, the multiple choice question didn't use have as its second word; it used has. With has, few isn't an option.






    share|improve this answer
























    • "Few [people / things] have changed at work since the last employee survey was carried out.|" This sounds grammatically incorrect to me for some reason.

      – BrainDefenestration
      16 hours ago








    • 12





      @JasonBassford: I don't think you can omit the "things" in "Few things have changed" without changing the meaning. Without it, it strongly implies you're talking about people.

      – Flater
      14 hours ago






    • 8





      @Flater. With suitable context it could be fine (e.g. "How are the trains?" "Few have run on time this week"). Without context I agree it implies people.

      – Mark Perryman
      12 hours ago






    • 6





      @Flater I don't think it strongly implies anything. WIthout any context, "Few have changed at work" is almost meaningless IMO. My reaction would be to wonder "Few what have changed?"

      – alephzero
      11 hours ago






    • 4





      Last year one of the things to come out of our staff survey was provision for lockers for cyclists so they can change once they get to work. So the statement 'Few have changed at work since the last employee survey was carried out." not only is perfectly meaningful, it might even be true at my office.

      – Pete Kirkham
      10 hours ago



















    1















    ____ has changed at work since the last employee survey was carried out.




    Both "few" and "little" occur as fused determiner-heads, but the former only occurs with personal plural nouns, as in Few would disagree with the decision, where we understand "few people".



    By contrast, paucal "little" occurs with non-personal nouns, as in your example.






    share|improve this answer



















    • 2





      Do you think this OP knows what a "fused determiner-head" and "paucal" mean? I don't see the point....

      – Lambie
      6 hours ago



















    -2














    Your example sentence is perfectly fine.



    The more-common problem is people misusing "less" when they should be using "fewer."



    "I like leaving early because there are less cars on the road."



    WRONG. There are fewer cars on the road. Saying "less cars" is as wrong as saying "I'd like fewer syrup on my pancakes, please."



    The most-frequently-encountered misuse of "less" is probably at the grocery store's express lane: "15 items or less." There's a video of Weird Al online somewhere, showing him bringing a replacement sign to the store and putting it over the incorrect one.






    share|improve this answer








    New contributor




    Oscar is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.





















    • This doesn't answer the question, which is about using "few" as the subject of the sentence, not whether to use "fewer" or "less".

      – ColleenV
      3 hours ago











    • How does it not answer the question? The first thing I said is, "Your example sentence is perfectly fine." That's a direct answer to the question. What's your problem?

      – Oscar
      1 hour ago













    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "481"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f201072%2fcan-few-be-used-as-a-subject-if-so-what-is-the-rule%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    4 Answers
    4






    active

    oldest

    votes








    4 Answers
    4






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    25














    We use "little" for uncountable nouns and "few" for countable nouns.

    In your sentence




    Little has changed at work since the last employee survey was carried out.




    The general situation has changed a bit. And "general situation" is an uncountable noun, therefore "little" is correct.



    In your second sentence




    Few have survived fighting polar bears barehanded.




    "Few have survived" implies few people have survived, and you can count people.






    share|improve this answer






























      25














      We use "little" for uncountable nouns and "few" for countable nouns.

      In your sentence




      Little has changed at work since the last employee survey was carried out.




      The general situation has changed a bit. And "general situation" is an uncountable noun, therefore "little" is correct.



      In your second sentence




      Few have survived fighting polar bears barehanded.




      "Few have survived" implies few people have survived, and you can count people.






      share|improve this answer




























        25












        25








        25







        We use "little" for uncountable nouns and "few" for countable nouns.

        In your sentence




        Little has changed at work since the last employee survey was carried out.




        The general situation has changed a bit. And "general situation" is an uncountable noun, therefore "little" is correct.



        In your second sentence




        Few have survived fighting polar bears barehanded.




        "Few have survived" implies few people have survived, and you can count people.






        share|improve this answer















        We use "little" for uncountable nouns and "few" for countable nouns.

        In your sentence




        Little has changed at work since the last employee survey was carried out.




        The general situation has changed a bit. And "general situation" is an uncountable noun, therefore "little" is correct.



        In your second sentence




        Few have survived fighting polar bears barehanded.




        "Few have survived" implies few people have survived, and you can count people.







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited 7 hours ago









        Jasper

        18.7k43771




        18.7k43771










        answered 16 hours ago









        Kshitij SinghKshitij Singh

        625112




        625112

























            5














            This sentence would work:




            Few have changed at work since the last employee survey was carried out.




            The difference is that few requires a plural verb form. Few has is ungrammatical, but few have is fine.





            Note the subtle difference in meaning based on the words that could be implied to exist but that have been left out:




            Little [of anything] has changed at work since the last employee survey was carried out.




            Versus:




            Few [people / things] have changed at work since the last employee survey was carried out.




            The subject goes from something general to something more specific.





            However, the multiple choice question didn't use have as its second word; it used has. With has, few isn't an option.






            share|improve this answer
























            • "Few [people / things] have changed at work since the last employee survey was carried out.|" This sounds grammatically incorrect to me for some reason.

              – BrainDefenestration
              16 hours ago








            • 12





              @JasonBassford: I don't think you can omit the "things" in "Few things have changed" without changing the meaning. Without it, it strongly implies you're talking about people.

              – Flater
              14 hours ago






            • 8





              @Flater. With suitable context it could be fine (e.g. "How are the trains?" "Few have run on time this week"). Without context I agree it implies people.

              – Mark Perryman
              12 hours ago






            • 6





              @Flater I don't think it strongly implies anything. WIthout any context, "Few have changed at work" is almost meaningless IMO. My reaction would be to wonder "Few what have changed?"

              – alephzero
              11 hours ago






            • 4





              Last year one of the things to come out of our staff survey was provision for lockers for cyclists so they can change once they get to work. So the statement 'Few have changed at work since the last employee survey was carried out." not only is perfectly meaningful, it might even be true at my office.

              – Pete Kirkham
              10 hours ago
















            5














            This sentence would work:




            Few have changed at work since the last employee survey was carried out.




            The difference is that few requires a plural verb form. Few has is ungrammatical, but few have is fine.





            Note the subtle difference in meaning based on the words that could be implied to exist but that have been left out:




            Little [of anything] has changed at work since the last employee survey was carried out.




            Versus:




            Few [people / things] have changed at work since the last employee survey was carried out.




            The subject goes from something general to something more specific.





            However, the multiple choice question didn't use have as its second word; it used has. With has, few isn't an option.






            share|improve this answer
























            • "Few [people / things] have changed at work since the last employee survey was carried out.|" This sounds grammatically incorrect to me for some reason.

              – BrainDefenestration
              16 hours ago








            • 12





              @JasonBassford: I don't think you can omit the "things" in "Few things have changed" without changing the meaning. Without it, it strongly implies you're talking about people.

              – Flater
              14 hours ago






            • 8





              @Flater. With suitable context it could be fine (e.g. "How are the trains?" "Few have run on time this week"). Without context I agree it implies people.

              – Mark Perryman
              12 hours ago






            • 6





              @Flater I don't think it strongly implies anything. WIthout any context, "Few have changed at work" is almost meaningless IMO. My reaction would be to wonder "Few what have changed?"

              – alephzero
              11 hours ago






            • 4





              Last year one of the things to come out of our staff survey was provision for lockers for cyclists so they can change once they get to work. So the statement 'Few have changed at work since the last employee survey was carried out." not only is perfectly meaningful, it might even be true at my office.

              – Pete Kirkham
              10 hours ago














            5












            5








            5







            This sentence would work:




            Few have changed at work since the last employee survey was carried out.




            The difference is that few requires a plural verb form. Few has is ungrammatical, but few have is fine.





            Note the subtle difference in meaning based on the words that could be implied to exist but that have been left out:




            Little [of anything] has changed at work since the last employee survey was carried out.




            Versus:




            Few [people / things] have changed at work since the last employee survey was carried out.




            The subject goes from something general to something more specific.





            However, the multiple choice question didn't use have as its second word; it used has. With has, few isn't an option.






            share|improve this answer













            This sentence would work:




            Few have changed at work since the last employee survey was carried out.




            The difference is that few requires a plural verb form. Few has is ungrammatical, but few have is fine.





            Note the subtle difference in meaning based on the words that could be implied to exist but that have been left out:




            Little [of anything] has changed at work since the last employee survey was carried out.




            Versus:




            Few [people / things] have changed at work since the last employee survey was carried out.




            The subject goes from something general to something more specific.





            However, the multiple choice question didn't use have as its second word; it used has. With has, few isn't an option.







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered 16 hours ago









            Jason BassfordJason Bassford

            16.3k22238




            16.3k22238













            • "Few [people / things] have changed at work since the last employee survey was carried out.|" This sounds grammatically incorrect to me for some reason.

              – BrainDefenestration
              16 hours ago








            • 12





              @JasonBassford: I don't think you can omit the "things" in "Few things have changed" without changing the meaning. Without it, it strongly implies you're talking about people.

              – Flater
              14 hours ago






            • 8





              @Flater. With suitable context it could be fine (e.g. "How are the trains?" "Few have run on time this week"). Without context I agree it implies people.

              – Mark Perryman
              12 hours ago






            • 6





              @Flater I don't think it strongly implies anything. WIthout any context, "Few have changed at work" is almost meaningless IMO. My reaction would be to wonder "Few what have changed?"

              – alephzero
              11 hours ago






            • 4





              Last year one of the things to come out of our staff survey was provision for lockers for cyclists so they can change once they get to work. So the statement 'Few have changed at work since the last employee survey was carried out." not only is perfectly meaningful, it might even be true at my office.

              – Pete Kirkham
              10 hours ago



















            • "Few [people / things] have changed at work since the last employee survey was carried out.|" This sounds grammatically incorrect to me for some reason.

              – BrainDefenestration
              16 hours ago








            • 12





              @JasonBassford: I don't think you can omit the "things" in "Few things have changed" without changing the meaning. Without it, it strongly implies you're talking about people.

              – Flater
              14 hours ago






            • 8





              @Flater. With suitable context it could be fine (e.g. "How are the trains?" "Few have run on time this week"). Without context I agree it implies people.

              – Mark Perryman
              12 hours ago






            • 6





              @Flater I don't think it strongly implies anything. WIthout any context, "Few have changed at work" is almost meaningless IMO. My reaction would be to wonder "Few what have changed?"

              – alephzero
              11 hours ago






            • 4





              Last year one of the things to come out of our staff survey was provision for lockers for cyclists so they can change once they get to work. So the statement 'Few have changed at work since the last employee survey was carried out." not only is perfectly meaningful, it might even be true at my office.

              – Pete Kirkham
              10 hours ago

















            "Few [people / things] have changed at work since the last employee survey was carried out.|" This sounds grammatically incorrect to me for some reason.

            – BrainDefenestration
            16 hours ago







            "Few [people / things] have changed at work since the last employee survey was carried out.|" This sounds grammatically incorrect to me for some reason.

            – BrainDefenestration
            16 hours ago






            12




            12





            @JasonBassford: I don't think you can omit the "things" in "Few things have changed" without changing the meaning. Without it, it strongly implies you're talking about people.

            – Flater
            14 hours ago





            @JasonBassford: I don't think you can omit the "things" in "Few things have changed" without changing the meaning. Without it, it strongly implies you're talking about people.

            – Flater
            14 hours ago




            8




            8





            @Flater. With suitable context it could be fine (e.g. "How are the trains?" "Few have run on time this week"). Without context I agree it implies people.

            – Mark Perryman
            12 hours ago





            @Flater. With suitable context it could be fine (e.g. "How are the trains?" "Few have run on time this week"). Without context I agree it implies people.

            – Mark Perryman
            12 hours ago




            6




            6





            @Flater I don't think it strongly implies anything. WIthout any context, "Few have changed at work" is almost meaningless IMO. My reaction would be to wonder "Few what have changed?"

            – alephzero
            11 hours ago





            @Flater I don't think it strongly implies anything. WIthout any context, "Few have changed at work" is almost meaningless IMO. My reaction would be to wonder "Few what have changed?"

            – alephzero
            11 hours ago




            4




            4





            Last year one of the things to come out of our staff survey was provision for lockers for cyclists so they can change once they get to work. So the statement 'Few have changed at work since the last employee survey was carried out." not only is perfectly meaningful, it might even be true at my office.

            – Pete Kirkham
            10 hours ago





            Last year one of the things to come out of our staff survey was provision for lockers for cyclists so they can change once they get to work. So the statement 'Few have changed at work since the last employee survey was carried out." not only is perfectly meaningful, it might even be true at my office.

            – Pete Kirkham
            10 hours ago











            1















            ____ has changed at work since the last employee survey was carried out.




            Both "few" and "little" occur as fused determiner-heads, but the former only occurs with personal plural nouns, as in Few would disagree with the decision, where we understand "few people".



            By contrast, paucal "little" occurs with non-personal nouns, as in your example.






            share|improve this answer



















            • 2





              Do you think this OP knows what a "fused determiner-head" and "paucal" mean? I don't see the point....

              – Lambie
              6 hours ago
















            1















            ____ has changed at work since the last employee survey was carried out.




            Both "few" and "little" occur as fused determiner-heads, but the former only occurs with personal plural nouns, as in Few would disagree with the decision, where we understand "few people".



            By contrast, paucal "little" occurs with non-personal nouns, as in your example.






            share|improve this answer



















            • 2





              Do you think this OP knows what a "fused determiner-head" and "paucal" mean? I don't see the point....

              – Lambie
              6 hours ago














            1












            1








            1








            ____ has changed at work since the last employee survey was carried out.




            Both "few" and "little" occur as fused determiner-heads, but the former only occurs with personal plural nouns, as in Few would disagree with the decision, where we understand "few people".



            By contrast, paucal "little" occurs with non-personal nouns, as in your example.






            share|improve this answer














            ____ has changed at work since the last employee survey was carried out.




            Both "few" and "little" occur as fused determiner-heads, but the former only occurs with personal plural nouns, as in Few would disagree with the decision, where we understand "few people".



            By contrast, paucal "little" occurs with non-personal nouns, as in your example.







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered 7 hours ago









            BillJBillJ

            6,6231719




            6,6231719








            • 2





              Do you think this OP knows what a "fused determiner-head" and "paucal" mean? I don't see the point....

              – Lambie
              6 hours ago














            • 2





              Do you think this OP knows what a "fused determiner-head" and "paucal" mean? I don't see the point....

              – Lambie
              6 hours ago








            2




            2





            Do you think this OP knows what a "fused determiner-head" and "paucal" mean? I don't see the point....

            – Lambie
            6 hours ago





            Do you think this OP knows what a "fused determiner-head" and "paucal" mean? I don't see the point....

            – Lambie
            6 hours ago











            -2














            Your example sentence is perfectly fine.



            The more-common problem is people misusing "less" when they should be using "fewer."



            "I like leaving early because there are less cars on the road."



            WRONG. There are fewer cars on the road. Saying "less cars" is as wrong as saying "I'd like fewer syrup on my pancakes, please."



            The most-frequently-encountered misuse of "less" is probably at the grocery store's express lane: "15 items or less." There's a video of Weird Al online somewhere, showing him bringing a replacement sign to the store and putting it over the incorrect one.






            share|improve this answer








            New contributor




            Oscar is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.





















            • This doesn't answer the question, which is about using "few" as the subject of the sentence, not whether to use "fewer" or "less".

              – ColleenV
              3 hours ago











            • How does it not answer the question? The first thing I said is, "Your example sentence is perfectly fine." That's a direct answer to the question. What's your problem?

              – Oscar
              1 hour ago


















            -2














            Your example sentence is perfectly fine.



            The more-common problem is people misusing "less" when they should be using "fewer."



            "I like leaving early because there are less cars on the road."



            WRONG. There are fewer cars on the road. Saying "less cars" is as wrong as saying "I'd like fewer syrup on my pancakes, please."



            The most-frequently-encountered misuse of "less" is probably at the grocery store's express lane: "15 items or less." There's a video of Weird Al online somewhere, showing him bringing a replacement sign to the store and putting it over the incorrect one.






            share|improve this answer








            New contributor




            Oscar is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.





















            • This doesn't answer the question, which is about using "few" as the subject of the sentence, not whether to use "fewer" or "less".

              – ColleenV
              3 hours ago











            • How does it not answer the question? The first thing I said is, "Your example sentence is perfectly fine." That's a direct answer to the question. What's your problem?

              – Oscar
              1 hour ago
















            -2












            -2








            -2







            Your example sentence is perfectly fine.



            The more-common problem is people misusing "less" when they should be using "fewer."



            "I like leaving early because there are less cars on the road."



            WRONG. There are fewer cars on the road. Saying "less cars" is as wrong as saying "I'd like fewer syrup on my pancakes, please."



            The most-frequently-encountered misuse of "less" is probably at the grocery store's express lane: "15 items or less." There's a video of Weird Al online somewhere, showing him bringing a replacement sign to the store and putting it over the incorrect one.






            share|improve this answer








            New contributor




            Oscar is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.










            Your example sentence is perfectly fine.



            The more-common problem is people misusing "less" when they should be using "fewer."



            "I like leaving early because there are less cars on the road."



            WRONG. There are fewer cars on the road. Saying "less cars" is as wrong as saying "I'd like fewer syrup on my pancakes, please."



            The most-frequently-encountered misuse of "less" is probably at the grocery store's express lane: "15 items or less." There's a video of Weird Al online somewhere, showing him bringing a replacement sign to the store and putting it over the incorrect one.







            share|improve this answer








            New contributor




            Oscar is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.









            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer






            New contributor




            Oscar is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.









            answered 3 hours ago









            OscarOscar

            97




            97




            New contributor




            Oscar is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.





            New contributor





            Oscar is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.






            Oscar is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.













            • This doesn't answer the question, which is about using "few" as the subject of the sentence, not whether to use "fewer" or "less".

              – ColleenV
              3 hours ago











            • How does it not answer the question? The first thing I said is, "Your example sentence is perfectly fine." That's a direct answer to the question. What's your problem?

              – Oscar
              1 hour ago





















            • This doesn't answer the question, which is about using "few" as the subject of the sentence, not whether to use "fewer" or "less".

              – ColleenV
              3 hours ago











            • How does it not answer the question? The first thing I said is, "Your example sentence is perfectly fine." That's a direct answer to the question. What's your problem?

              – Oscar
              1 hour ago



















            This doesn't answer the question, which is about using "few" as the subject of the sentence, not whether to use "fewer" or "less".

            – ColleenV
            3 hours ago





            This doesn't answer the question, which is about using "few" as the subject of the sentence, not whether to use "fewer" or "less".

            – ColleenV
            3 hours ago













            How does it not answer the question? The first thing I said is, "Your example sentence is perfectly fine." That's a direct answer to the question. What's your problem?

            – Oscar
            1 hour ago







            How does it not answer the question? The first thing I said is, "Your example sentence is perfectly fine." That's a direct answer to the question. What's your problem?

            – Oscar
            1 hour ago




















            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language Learners Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f201072%2fcan-few-be-used-as-a-subject-if-so-what-is-the-rule%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            How did Captain America manage to do this?

            迪纳利

            南乌拉尔铁路局