Homology of the fiber












9












$begingroup$


Let $f:Xrightarrow Y $ be a fibration (with fiber $F$) between simply connected spaces such that
$H_{ast}(f):H_{ast}(X,mathbb{Z})rightarrow H_{ast}(Y,mathbb{Z})$ is an isomorphism for $astleq n$



Is it true that the reduced homology of the fiber is $tilde{H}_{ast}(F,mathbb{Z})=0$ for $astleq n$?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 6




    $begingroup$
    What about the Hopf fibration $f:mathbb{S}^3rightarrow mathbb{S}^2$ with fiber $mathbb{S}^1$? $H_1(f)$ is an isomorphism but $H_1(mathbb{S}^1)=mathbb{Z}$.
    $endgroup$
    – abx
    17 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Besides the proof below, this (the vanishing of the reduced homology of fiber below dimension n) also admits an easy proof using the Serre spectral sequence.
    $endgroup$
    – Nicholas Kuhn
    7 hours ago
















9












$begingroup$


Let $f:Xrightarrow Y $ be a fibration (with fiber $F$) between simply connected spaces such that
$H_{ast}(f):H_{ast}(X,mathbb{Z})rightarrow H_{ast}(Y,mathbb{Z})$ is an isomorphism for $astleq n$



Is it true that the reduced homology of the fiber is $tilde{H}_{ast}(F,mathbb{Z})=0$ for $astleq n$?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 6




    $begingroup$
    What about the Hopf fibration $f:mathbb{S}^3rightarrow mathbb{S}^2$ with fiber $mathbb{S}^1$? $H_1(f)$ is an isomorphism but $H_1(mathbb{S}^1)=mathbb{Z}$.
    $endgroup$
    – abx
    17 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Besides the proof below, this (the vanishing of the reduced homology of fiber below dimension n) also admits an easy proof using the Serre spectral sequence.
    $endgroup$
    – Nicholas Kuhn
    7 hours ago














9












9








9


2



$begingroup$


Let $f:Xrightarrow Y $ be a fibration (with fiber $F$) between simply connected spaces such that
$H_{ast}(f):H_{ast}(X,mathbb{Z})rightarrow H_{ast}(Y,mathbb{Z})$ is an isomorphism for $astleq n$



Is it true that the reduced homology of the fiber is $tilde{H}_{ast}(F,mathbb{Z})=0$ for $astleq n$?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Let $f:Xrightarrow Y $ be a fibration (with fiber $F$) between simply connected spaces such that
$H_{ast}(f):H_{ast}(X,mathbb{Z})rightarrow H_{ast}(Y,mathbb{Z})$ is an isomorphism for $astleq n$



Is it true that the reduced homology of the fiber is $tilde{H}_{ast}(F,mathbb{Z})=0$ for $astleq n$?







at.algebraic-topology homotopy-theory






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 12 hours ago









Peter Mortensen

1675




1675










asked 17 hours ago









ParisParis

1154




1154








  • 6




    $begingroup$
    What about the Hopf fibration $f:mathbb{S}^3rightarrow mathbb{S}^2$ with fiber $mathbb{S}^1$? $H_1(f)$ is an isomorphism but $H_1(mathbb{S}^1)=mathbb{Z}$.
    $endgroup$
    – abx
    17 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Besides the proof below, this (the vanishing of the reduced homology of fiber below dimension n) also admits an easy proof using the Serre spectral sequence.
    $endgroup$
    – Nicholas Kuhn
    7 hours ago














  • 6




    $begingroup$
    What about the Hopf fibration $f:mathbb{S}^3rightarrow mathbb{S}^2$ with fiber $mathbb{S}^1$? $H_1(f)$ is an isomorphism but $H_1(mathbb{S}^1)=mathbb{Z}$.
    $endgroup$
    – abx
    17 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Besides the proof below, this (the vanishing of the reduced homology of fiber below dimension n) also admits an easy proof using the Serre spectral sequence.
    $endgroup$
    – Nicholas Kuhn
    7 hours ago








6




6




$begingroup$
What about the Hopf fibration $f:mathbb{S}^3rightarrow mathbb{S}^2$ with fiber $mathbb{S}^1$? $H_1(f)$ is an isomorphism but $H_1(mathbb{S}^1)=mathbb{Z}$.
$endgroup$
– abx
17 hours ago




$begingroup$
What about the Hopf fibration $f:mathbb{S}^3rightarrow mathbb{S}^2$ with fiber $mathbb{S}^1$? $H_1(f)$ is an isomorphism but $H_1(mathbb{S}^1)=mathbb{Z}$.
$endgroup$
– abx
17 hours ago












$begingroup$
Besides the proof below, this (the vanishing of the reduced homology of fiber below dimension n) also admits an easy proof using the Serre spectral sequence.
$endgroup$
– Nicholas Kuhn
7 hours ago




$begingroup$
Besides the proof below, this (the vanishing of the reduced homology of fiber below dimension n) also admits an easy proof using the Serre spectral sequence.
$endgroup$
– Nicholas Kuhn
7 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















21












$begingroup$

As usual, there's no loss of generality in assuming that $f$ is the inclusion of a subspace $Xsubset Y$, replacing $Y$ with the homotopy equivalent mapping cylinder of $f$ if necessary. By your assumptions and the five lemma, $H_*(Y,X)=0$ for $*leq n$, and the pair $(Y,X)$ is simply connected, therefore by the Hurewicz theorems $pi_*(Y,X)=0$ for $*leq n$. If $F$ denotes the homotopy fiber of $f$, then $pi_*(Y,X)=pi_{*-1}(F)$ in all dimensions, hence the previous computation ensures that $F$ is $(n-1)$-connected, so $H_*(F)=0$ for $*leq n-1$. As @abx shows in the comment above, in general $H_n(F)$ won't be trivial. The higher-dimensional Hopf fibrations provide further counterexamples, where even the fiber is simply connected.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "504"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f325671%2fhomology-of-the-fiber%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    21












    $begingroup$

    As usual, there's no loss of generality in assuming that $f$ is the inclusion of a subspace $Xsubset Y$, replacing $Y$ with the homotopy equivalent mapping cylinder of $f$ if necessary. By your assumptions and the five lemma, $H_*(Y,X)=0$ for $*leq n$, and the pair $(Y,X)$ is simply connected, therefore by the Hurewicz theorems $pi_*(Y,X)=0$ for $*leq n$. If $F$ denotes the homotopy fiber of $f$, then $pi_*(Y,X)=pi_{*-1}(F)$ in all dimensions, hence the previous computation ensures that $F$ is $(n-1)$-connected, so $H_*(F)=0$ for $*leq n-1$. As @abx shows in the comment above, in general $H_n(F)$ won't be trivial. The higher-dimensional Hopf fibrations provide further counterexamples, where even the fiber is simply connected.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$


















      21












      $begingroup$

      As usual, there's no loss of generality in assuming that $f$ is the inclusion of a subspace $Xsubset Y$, replacing $Y$ with the homotopy equivalent mapping cylinder of $f$ if necessary. By your assumptions and the five lemma, $H_*(Y,X)=0$ for $*leq n$, and the pair $(Y,X)$ is simply connected, therefore by the Hurewicz theorems $pi_*(Y,X)=0$ for $*leq n$. If $F$ denotes the homotopy fiber of $f$, then $pi_*(Y,X)=pi_{*-1}(F)$ in all dimensions, hence the previous computation ensures that $F$ is $(n-1)$-connected, so $H_*(F)=0$ for $*leq n-1$. As @abx shows in the comment above, in general $H_n(F)$ won't be trivial. The higher-dimensional Hopf fibrations provide further counterexamples, where even the fiber is simply connected.






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$
















        21












        21








        21





        $begingroup$

        As usual, there's no loss of generality in assuming that $f$ is the inclusion of a subspace $Xsubset Y$, replacing $Y$ with the homotopy equivalent mapping cylinder of $f$ if necessary. By your assumptions and the five lemma, $H_*(Y,X)=0$ for $*leq n$, and the pair $(Y,X)$ is simply connected, therefore by the Hurewicz theorems $pi_*(Y,X)=0$ for $*leq n$. If $F$ denotes the homotopy fiber of $f$, then $pi_*(Y,X)=pi_{*-1}(F)$ in all dimensions, hence the previous computation ensures that $F$ is $(n-1)$-connected, so $H_*(F)=0$ for $*leq n-1$. As @abx shows in the comment above, in general $H_n(F)$ won't be trivial. The higher-dimensional Hopf fibrations provide further counterexamples, where even the fiber is simply connected.






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        As usual, there's no loss of generality in assuming that $f$ is the inclusion of a subspace $Xsubset Y$, replacing $Y$ with the homotopy equivalent mapping cylinder of $f$ if necessary. By your assumptions and the five lemma, $H_*(Y,X)=0$ for $*leq n$, and the pair $(Y,X)$ is simply connected, therefore by the Hurewicz theorems $pi_*(Y,X)=0$ for $*leq n$. If $F$ denotes the homotopy fiber of $f$, then $pi_*(Y,X)=pi_{*-1}(F)$ in all dimensions, hence the previous computation ensures that $F$ is $(n-1)$-connected, so $H_*(F)=0$ for $*leq n-1$. As @abx shows in the comment above, in general $H_n(F)$ won't be trivial. The higher-dimensional Hopf fibrations provide further counterexamples, where even the fiber is simply connected.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited 9 hours ago









        ThiKu

        6,32012137




        6,32012137










        answered 17 hours ago









        Fernando MuroFernando Muro

        11.9k23465




        11.9k23465






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to MathOverflow!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f325671%2fhomology-of-the-fiber%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            How did Captain America manage to do this?

            迪纳利

            南乌拉尔铁路局