Convergence in probability and convergence in distribution












4












$begingroup$


Im a little confused about the difference of these two concepts, especially the convergence of probability. I understand that $X_{n} overset{p}{to} Z $ if $Pr(|X_{n} - Z|>epsilon)=0$ for any $epsilon >0$ when $n rightarrow infty$.



I just need some clarification on what the subscript $n$ means and what $Z$ means. Is $n$ the sample size? is $Z$ a specific value, or another random variable? If it is another random variable, then wouldn't that mean that convergence in probability implies convergence in distribution? Also, Could you please give me some examples of things that are convergent in distribution but not in probability?










share|improve this question







New contributor




Martin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    See: quora.com/…
    $endgroup$
    – afreelunch
    13 hours ago
















4












$begingroup$


Im a little confused about the difference of these two concepts, especially the convergence of probability. I understand that $X_{n} overset{p}{to} Z $ if $Pr(|X_{n} - Z|>epsilon)=0$ for any $epsilon >0$ when $n rightarrow infty$.



I just need some clarification on what the subscript $n$ means and what $Z$ means. Is $n$ the sample size? is $Z$ a specific value, or another random variable? If it is another random variable, then wouldn't that mean that convergence in probability implies convergence in distribution? Also, Could you please give me some examples of things that are convergent in distribution but not in probability?










share|improve this question







New contributor




Martin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    See: quora.com/…
    $endgroup$
    – afreelunch
    13 hours ago














4












4








4





$begingroup$


Im a little confused about the difference of these two concepts, especially the convergence of probability. I understand that $X_{n} overset{p}{to} Z $ if $Pr(|X_{n} - Z|>epsilon)=0$ for any $epsilon >0$ when $n rightarrow infty$.



I just need some clarification on what the subscript $n$ means and what $Z$ means. Is $n$ the sample size? is $Z$ a specific value, or another random variable? If it is another random variable, then wouldn't that mean that convergence in probability implies convergence in distribution? Also, Could you please give me some examples of things that are convergent in distribution but not in probability?










share|improve this question







New contributor




Martin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$




Im a little confused about the difference of these two concepts, especially the convergence of probability. I understand that $X_{n} overset{p}{to} Z $ if $Pr(|X_{n} - Z|>epsilon)=0$ for any $epsilon >0$ when $n rightarrow infty$.



I just need some clarification on what the subscript $n$ means and what $Z$ means. Is $n$ the sample size? is $Z$ a specific value, or another random variable? If it is another random variable, then wouldn't that mean that convergence in probability implies convergence in distribution? Also, Could you please give me some examples of things that are convergent in distribution but not in probability?







econometrics statistics






share|improve this question







New contributor




Martin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question







New contributor




Martin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question






New contributor




Martin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 14 hours ago









Martin Martin

403




403




New contributor




Martin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Martin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Martin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












  • $begingroup$
    See: quora.com/…
    $endgroup$
    – afreelunch
    13 hours ago


















  • $begingroup$
    See: quora.com/…
    $endgroup$
    – afreelunch
    13 hours ago
















$begingroup$
See: quora.com/…
$endgroup$
– afreelunch
13 hours ago




$begingroup$
See: quora.com/…
$endgroup$
– afreelunch
13 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















3












$begingroup$

I will attempt to explain the distinction using the simplest example: the sample mean. Suppose we have an iid sample of random variables ${X_i}_{i=1}^n$. Then define the sample mean as $bar{X}_n$. As the sample size grows, our value of the sample mean changes, hence the subscript $n$ to emphasize that our sample mean depends on the sample size.



Noting that $bar{X}_n$ itself is a random variable, we can define a sequence of random variables, where elements of the sequence are indexed by different samples (sample size is growing), i.e. ${bar{X}_n}_{n=1}^{infty}$. The weak law of large numbers (WLLN) tells us that so long as $E(X_1^2)<infty$, that
$$plimbar{X}_n = mu,$$
or equivalently
$$bar{X}_n rightarrow_P mu,$$



where $mu=E(X_1)$. This means, for sufficiently large sample size, we can get our sample mean arbitrarily close to the true mean. Formally,
$$forall epsilon>0, exists n_{epsilon} in mathbb{N}: forall n>n_{epsilon}, P(|bar{X}_n - mu| <epsilon)=1. $$
In other words, if we want our estimate to be within $epsilon$ of the true value, there exists a sample size, $n_{epsilon}$, such that for any sample at least that large, our estimate will be within $epsilon$ of the true value with probability 1. Convergence in probability gives us confidence our estimators perform well with large samples.



Convergence in distribution tell us something very different and is primarily used for hypothesis testing. Under the same distributional assumptions described above, CLT gives us that
$$sqrt{n}(bar{X}_n-mu) rightarrow_D N(0,E(X_1^2)).$$
Convergence in distribution means that the cdf of the left-hand size converges at all continuity points to the cdf of the right-hand side, i.e.
$$lim_{n rightarrow infty} F_n(x) = F(x),$$
where $F_n(x)$ is the cdf of $sqrt{n}(bar{X}_n-mu)$ and $F(x)$ is the cdf for a $N(0,E(X_1^2))$ distribution. Knowing the limiting distribution allows us to test hypotheses about the sample mean (or whatever estimate we are generating).






share|improve this answer










New contributor




dlnB is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "591"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });






    Martin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2feconomics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f27300%2fconvergence-in-probability-and-convergence-in-distribution%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    3












    $begingroup$

    I will attempt to explain the distinction using the simplest example: the sample mean. Suppose we have an iid sample of random variables ${X_i}_{i=1}^n$. Then define the sample mean as $bar{X}_n$. As the sample size grows, our value of the sample mean changes, hence the subscript $n$ to emphasize that our sample mean depends on the sample size.



    Noting that $bar{X}_n$ itself is a random variable, we can define a sequence of random variables, where elements of the sequence are indexed by different samples (sample size is growing), i.e. ${bar{X}_n}_{n=1}^{infty}$. The weak law of large numbers (WLLN) tells us that so long as $E(X_1^2)<infty$, that
    $$plimbar{X}_n = mu,$$
    or equivalently
    $$bar{X}_n rightarrow_P mu,$$



    where $mu=E(X_1)$. This means, for sufficiently large sample size, we can get our sample mean arbitrarily close to the true mean. Formally,
    $$forall epsilon>0, exists n_{epsilon} in mathbb{N}: forall n>n_{epsilon}, P(|bar{X}_n - mu| <epsilon)=1. $$
    In other words, if we want our estimate to be within $epsilon$ of the true value, there exists a sample size, $n_{epsilon}$, such that for any sample at least that large, our estimate will be within $epsilon$ of the true value with probability 1. Convergence in probability gives us confidence our estimators perform well with large samples.



    Convergence in distribution tell us something very different and is primarily used for hypothesis testing. Under the same distributional assumptions described above, CLT gives us that
    $$sqrt{n}(bar{X}_n-mu) rightarrow_D N(0,E(X_1^2)).$$
    Convergence in distribution means that the cdf of the left-hand size converges at all continuity points to the cdf of the right-hand side, i.e.
    $$lim_{n rightarrow infty} F_n(x) = F(x),$$
    where $F_n(x)$ is the cdf of $sqrt{n}(bar{X}_n-mu)$ and $F(x)$ is the cdf for a $N(0,E(X_1^2))$ distribution. Knowing the limiting distribution allows us to test hypotheses about the sample mean (or whatever estimate we are generating).






    share|improve this answer










    New contributor




    dlnB is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






    $endgroup$


















      3












      $begingroup$

      I will attempt to explain the distinction using the simplest example: the sample mean. Suppose we have an iid sample of random variables ${X_i}_{i=1}^n$. Then define the sample mean as $bar{X}_n$. As the sample size grows, our value of the sample mean changes, hence the subscript $n$ to emphasize that our sample mean depends on the sample size.



      Noting that $bar{X}_n$ itself is a random variable, we can define a sequence of random variables, where elements of the sequence are indexed by different samples (sample size is growing), i.e. ${bar{X}_n}_{n=1}^{infty}$. The weak law of large numbers (WLLN) tells us that so long as $E(X_1^2)<infty$, that
      $$plimbar{X}_n = mu,$$
      or equivalently
      $$bar{X}_n rightarrow_P mu,$$



      where $mu=E(X_1)$. This means, for sufficiently large sample size, we can get our sample mean arbitrarily close to the true mean. Formally,
      $$forall epsilon>0, exists n_{epsilon} in mathbb{N}: forall n>n_{epsilon}, P(|bar{X}_n - mu| <epsilon)=1. $$
      In other words, if we want our estimate to be within $epsilon$ of the true value, there exists a sample size, $n_{epsilon}$, such that for any sample at least that large, our estimate will be within $epsilon$ of the true value with probability 1. Convergence in probability gives us confidence our estimators perform well with large samples.



      Convergence in distribution tell us something very different and is primarily used for hypothesis testing. Under the same distributional assumptions described above, CLT gives us that
      $$sqrt{n}(bar{X}_n-mu) rightarrow_D N(0,E(X_1^2)).$$
      Convergence in distribution means that the cdf of the left-hand size converges at all continuity points to the cdf of the right-hand side, i.e.
      $$lim_{n rightarrow infty} F_n(x) = F(x),$$
      where $F_n(x)$ is the cdf of $sqrt{n}(bar{X}_n-mu)$ and $F(x)$ is the cdf for a $N(0,E(X_1^2))$ distribution. Knowing the limiting distribution allows us to test hypotheses about the sample mean (or whatever estimate we are generating).






      share|improve this answer










      New contributor




      dlnB is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      $endgroup$
















        3












        3








        3





        $begingroup$

        I will attempt to explain the distinction using the simplest example: the sample mean. Suppose we have an iid sample of random variables ${X_i}_{i=1}^n$. Then define the sample mean as $bar{X}_n$. As the sample size grows, our value of the sample mean changes, hence the subscript $n$ to emphasize that our sample mean depends on the sample size.



        Noting that $bar{X}_n$ itself is a random variable, we can define a sequence of random variables, where elements of the sequence are indexed by different samples (sample size is growing), i.e. ${bar{X}_n}_{n=1}^{infty}$. The weak law of large numbers (WLLN) tells us that so long as $E(X_1^2)<infty$, that
        $$plimbar{X}_n = mu,$$
        or equivalently
        $$bar{X}_n rightarrow_P mu,$$



        where $mu=E(X_1)$. This means, for sufficiently large sample size, we can get our sample mean arbitrarily close to the true mean. Formally,
        $$forall epsilon>0, exists n_{epsilon} in mathbb{N}: forall n>n_{epsilon}, P(|bar{X}_n - mu| <epsilon)=1. $$
        In other words, if we want our estimate to be within $epsilon$ of the true value, there exists a sample size, $n_{epsilon}$, such that for any sample at least that large, our estimate will be within $epsilon$ of the true value with probability 1. Convergence in probability gives us confidence our estimators perform well with large samples.



        Convergence in distribution tell us something very different and is primarily used for hypothesis testing. Under the same distributional assumptions described above, CLT gives us that
        $$sqrt{n}(bar{X}_n-mu) rightarrow_D N(0,E(X_1^2)).$$
        Convergence in distribution means that the cdf of the left-hand size converges at all continuity points to the cdf of the right-hand side, i.e.
        $$lim_{n rightarrow infty} F_n(x) = F(x),$$
        where $F_n(x)$ is the cdf of $sqrt{n}(bar{X}_n-mu)$ and $F(x)$ is the cdf for a $N(0,E(X_1^2))$ distribution. Knowing the limiting distribution allows us to test hypotheses about the sample mean (or whatever estimate we are generating).






        share|improve this answer










        New contributor




        dlnB is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.






        $endgroup$



        I will attempt to explain the distinction using the simplest example: the sample mean. Suppose we have an iid sample of random variables ${X_i}_{i=1}^n$. Then define the sample mean as $bar{X}_n$. As the sample size grows, our value of the sample mean changes, hence the subscript $n$ to emphasize that our sample mean depends on the sample size.



        Noting that $bar{X}_n$ itself is a random variable, we can define a sequence of random variables, where elements of the sequence are indexed by different samples (sample size is growing), i.e. ${bar{X}_n}_{n=1}^{infty}$. The weak law of large numbers (WLLN) tells us that so long as $E(X_1^2)<infty$, that
        $$plimbar{X}_n = mu,$$
        or equivalently
        $$bar{X}_n rightarrow_P mu,$$



        where $mu=E(X_1)$. This means, for sufficiently large sample size, we can get our sample mean arbitrarily close to the true mean. Formally,
        $$forall epsilon>0, exists n_{epsilon} in mathbb{N}: forall n>n_{epsilon}, P(|bar{X}_n - mu| <epsilon)=1. $$
        In other words, if we want our estimate to be within $epsilon$ of the true value, there exists a sample size, $n_{epsilon}$, such that for any sample at least that large, our estimate will be within $epsilon$ of the true value with probability 1. Convergence in probability gives us confidence our estimators perform well with large samples.



        Convergence in distribution tell us something very different and is primarily used for hypothesis testing. Under the same distributional assumptions described above, CLT gives us that
        $$sqrt{n}(bar{X}_n-mu) rightarrow_D N(0,E(X_1^2)).$$
        Convergence in distribution means that the cdf of the left-hand size converges at all continuity points to the cdf of the right-hand side, i.e.
        $$lim_{n rightarrow infty} F_n(x) = F(x),$$
        where $F_n(x)$ is the cdf of $sqrt{n}(bar{X}_n-mu)$ and $F(x)$ is the cdf for a $N(0,E(X_1^2))$ distribution. Knowing the limiting distribution allows us to test hypotheses about the sample mean (or whatever estimate we are generating).







        share|improve this answer










        New contributor




        dlnB is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.









        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited 14 hours ago





















        New contributor




        dlnB is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.









        answered 14 hours ago









        dlnBdlnB

        3688




        3688




        New contributor




        dlnB is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.





        New contributor





        dlnB is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.






        dlnB is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.






















            Martin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            Martin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













            Martin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            Martin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















            Thanks for contributing an answer to Economics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2feconomics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f27300%2fconvergence-in-probability-and-convergence-in-distribution%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            How did Captain America manage to do this?

            迪纳利

            南乌拉尔铁路局