How to say “Real-time” in regards to regular process












1















We have a software product which relies on a 3rd party API to give us our customers' hourly usage data. Though the usage is recorded and changes by the hour, the data which the API serves is updated with new data approx. once per 24hrs.



This means that, at N+23 hours, the data we have in our product is "real-time" in respect to the API'S (since we are constantly polling them to check if there is any update), but not real-time in respect to the actual usage data behind the scenes.



A lot of our marketing material says "real-time", but I don't think that is accurate. I think it's some thing more like "as real-time as possible". I guess there is also "latest", but I don't feel that is exactly accurate either. Any suggestions?










share|improve this question









New contributor




cloudpattern is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 1





    Sorry, unclear.

    – Hot Licks
    Mar 29 at 1:52






  • 1





    I don't know if there is a way to be more specific. "In real time updated hourly" kind of contradicts "in real time." If it's just marketing then I don't think it is an outright lie.

    – W.E.
    Mar 29 at 2:01











  • "hourly updated data" if you are not specific to use the phrase word real-time.

    – Ubi hatt
    Mar 29 at 2:06











  • @Hot Licks -- basically, there is data going into a database every hour. we are asking this database 'do you have any new data?' all the time, but it only responds 'yes' about every 24 hours.

    – cloudpattern
    Mar 29 at 2:21






  • 1





    Is this a question about the meaning of English words and phrases or about how far it is permissible to stretch the truth in advertising? The latter is a legal or an ethical question, and thus outside the scope of this site.

    – jsw29
    Mar 29 at 3:20


















1















We have a software product which relies on a 3rd party API to give us our customers' hourly usage data. Though the usage is recorded and changes by the hour, the data which the API serves is updated with new data approx. once per 24hrs.



This means that, at N+23 hours, the data we have in our product is "real-time" in respect to the API'S (since we are constantly polling them to check if there is any update), but not real-time in respect to the actual usage data behind the scenes.



A lot of our marketing material says "real-time", but I don't think that is accurate. I think it's some thing more like "as real-time as possible". I guess there is also "latest", but I don't feel that is exactly accurate either. Any suggestions?










share|improve this question









New contributor




cloudpattern is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 1





    Sorry, unclear.

    – Hot Licks
    Mar 29 at 1:52






  • 1





    I don't know if there is a way to be more specific. "In real time updated hourly" kind of contradicts "in real time." If it's just marketing then I don't think it is an outright lie.

    – W.E.
    Mar 29 at 2:01











  • "hourly updated data" if you are not specific to use the phrase word real-time.

    – Ubi hatt
    Mar 29 at 2:06











  • @Hot Licks -- basically, there is data going into a database every hour. we are asking this database 'do you have any new data?' all the time, but it only responds 'yes' about every 24 hours.

    – cloudpattern
    Mar 29 at 2:21






  • 1





    Is this a question about the meaning of English words and phrases or about how far it is permissible to stretch the truth in advertising? The latter is a legal or an ethical question, and thus outside the scope of this site.

    – jsw29
    Mar 29 at 3:20
















1












1








1








We have a software product which relies on a 3rd party API to give us our customers' hourly usage data. Though the usage is recorded and changes by the hour, the data which the API serves is updated with new data approx. once per 24hrs.



This means that, at N+23 hours, the data we have in our product is "real-time" in respect to the API'S (since we are constantly polling them to check if there is any update), but not real-time in respect to the actual usage data behind the scenes.



A lot of our marketing material says "real-time", but I don't think that is accurate. I think it's some thing more like "as real-time as possible". I guess there is also "latest", but I don't feel that is exactly accurate either. Any suggestions?










share|improve this question









New contributor




cloudpattern is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












We have a software product which relies on a 3rd party API to give us our customers' hourly usage data. Though the usage is recorded and changes by the hour, the data which the API serves is updated with new data approx. once per 24hrs.



This means that, at N+23 hours, the data we have in our product is "real-time" in respect to the API'S (since we are constantly polling them to check if there is any update), but not real-time in respect to the actual usage data behind the scenes.



A lot of our marketing material says "real-time", but I don't think that is accurate. I think it's some thing more like "as real-time as possible". I guess there is also "latest", but I don't feel that is exactly accurate either. Any suggestions?







single-word-requests software






share|improve this question









New contributor




cloudpattern is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




cloudpattern is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 2 days ago







cloudpattern













New contributor




cloudpattern is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked Mar 29 at 1:40









cloudpatterncloudpattern

84




84




New contributor




cloudpattern is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





cloudpattern is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






cloudpattern is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








  • 1





    Sorry, unclear.

    – Hot Licks
    Mar 29 at 1:52






  • 1





    I don't know if there is a way to be more specific. "In real time updated hourly" kind of contradicts "in real time." If it's just marketing then I don't think it is an outright lie.

    – W.E.
    Mar 29 at 2:01











  • "hourly updated data" if you are not specific to use the phrase word real-time.

    – Ubi hatt
    Mar 29 at 2:06











  • @Hot Licks -- basically, there is data going into a database every hour. we are asking this database 'do you have any new data?' all the time, but it only responds 'yes' about every 24 hours.

    – cloudpattern
    Mar 29 at 2:21






  • 1





    Is this a question about the meaning of English words and phrases or about how far it is permissible to stretch the truth in advertising? The latter is a legal or an ethical question, and thus outside the scope of this site.

    – jsw29
    Mar 29 at 3:20
















  • 1





    Sorry, unclear.

    – Hot Licks
    Mar 29 at 1:52






  • 1





    I don't know if there is a way to be more specific. "In real time updated hourly" kind of contradicts "in real time." If it's just marketing then I don't think it is an outright lie.

    – W.E.
    Mar 29 at 2:01











  • "hourly updated data" if you are not specific to use the phrase word real-time.

    – Ubi hatt
    Mar 29 at 2:06











  • @Hot Licks -- basically, there is data going into a database every hour. we are asking this database 'do you have any new data?' all the time, but it only responds 'yes' about every 24 hours.

    – cloudpattern
    Mar 29 at 2:21






  • 1





    Is this a question about the meaning of English words and phrases or about how far it is permissible to stretch the truth in advertising? The latter is a legal or an ethical question, and thus outside the scope of this site.

    – jsw29
    Mar 29 at 3:20










1




1





Sorry, unclear.

– Hot Licks
Mar 29 at 1:52





Sorry, unclear.

– Hot Licks
Mar 29 at 1:52




1




1





I don't know if there is a way to be more specific. "In real time updated hourly" kind of contradicts "in real time." If it's just marketing then I don't think it is an outright lie.

– W.E.
Mar 29 at 2:01





I don't know if there is a way to be more specific. "In real time updated hourly" kind of contradicts "in real time." If it's just marketing then I don't think it is an outright lie.

– W.E.
Mar 29 at 2:01













"hourly updated data" if you are not specific to use the phrase word real-time.

– Ubi hatt
Mar 29 at 2:06





"hourly updated data" if you are not specific to use the phrase word real-time.

– Ubi hatt
Mar 29 at 2:06













@Hot Licks -- basically, there is data going into a database every hour. we are asking this database 'do you have any new data?' all the time, but it only responds 'yes' about every 24 hours.

– cloudpattern
Mar 29 at 2:21





@Hot Licks -- basically, there is data going into a database every hour. we are asking this database 'do you have any new data?' all the time, but it only responds 'yes' about every 24 hours.

– cloudpattern
Mar 29 at 2:21




1




1





Is this a question about the meaning of English words and phrases or about how far it is permissible to stretch the truth in advertising? The latter is a legal or an ethical question, and thus outside the scope of this site.

– jsw29
Mar 29 at 3:20







Is this a question about the meaning of English words and phrases or about how far it is permissible to stretch the truth in advertising? The latter is a legal or an ethical question, and thus outside the scope of this site.

– jsw29
Mar 29 at 3:20












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1














Term: “Current as of...”



I used a similar process when I dealt with pulling data from an ERP system. We would record and report the refresh time stamp so it was always known. This was important to note because it would often account for discrepancies when compared to “live” data in the ERP system altered that day.



The data was refreshed daily on a schedule but could also be refreshed upon request. We would say that the data in our reporting db was “current” and often provide the time stamp to define the “as of” date and time. This was also critical in instances where the data refresh was unsuccessful and was therefore no longer current.



I agree that referring to this type of data as “live” or “real-time” would have given the wrong impression. Users often question why they do not see the changes they just made reflected in the data if it is not actually real-time.






share|improve this answer


























  • Current seems accurate for sure. I hope our marketing people are ok with that haha

    – cloudpattern
    Mar 29 at 2:22












Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});






cloudpattern is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f491789%2fhow-to-say-real-time-in-regards-to-regular-process%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









1














Term: “Current as of...”



I used a similar process when I dealt with pulling data from an ERP system. We would record and report the refresh time stamp so it was always known. This was important to note because it would often account for discrepancies when compared to “live” data in the ERP system altered that day.



The data was refreshed daily on a schedule but could also be refreshed upon request. We would say that the data in our reporting db was “current” and often provide the time stamp to define the “as of” date and time. This was also critical in instances where the data refresh was unsuccessful and was therefore no longer current.



I agree that referring to this type of data as “live” or “real-time” would have given the wrong impression. Users often question why they do not see the changes they just made reflected in the data if it is not actually real-time.






share|improve this answer


























  • Current seems accurate for sure. I hope our marketing people are ok with that haha

    – cloudpattern
    Mar 29 at 2:22
















1














Term: “Current as of...”



I used a similar process when I dealt with pulling data from an ERP system. We would record and report the refresh time stamp so it was always known. This was important to note because it would often account for discrepancies when compared to “live” data in the ERP system altered that day.



The data was refreshed daily on a schedule but could also be refreshed upon request. We would say that the data in our reporting db was “current” and often provide the time stamp to define the “as of” date and time. This was also critical in instances where the data refresh was unsuccessful and was therefore no longer current.



I agree that referring to this type of data as “live” or “real-time” would have given the wrong impression. Users often question why they do not see the changes they just made reflected in the data if it is not actually real-time.






share|improve this answer


























  • Current seems accurate for sure. I hope our marketing people are ok with that haha

    – cloudpattern
    Mar 29 at 2:22














1












1








1







Term: “Current as of...”



I used a similar process when I dealt with pulling data from an ERP system. We would record and report the refresh time stamp so it was always known. This was important to note because it would often account for discrepancies when compared to “live” data in the ERP system altered that day.



The data was refreshed daily on a schedule but could also be refreshed upon request. We would say that the data in our reporting db was “current” and often provide the time stamp to define the “as of” date and time. This was also critical in instances where the data refresh was unsuccessful and was therefore no longer current.



I agree that referring to this type of data as “live” or “real-time” would have given the wrong impression. Users often question why they do not see the changes they just made reflected in the data if it is not actually real-time.






share|improve this answer















Term: “Current as of...”



I used a similar process when I dealt with pulling data from an ERP system. We would record and report the refresh time stamp so it was always known. This was important to note because it would often account for discrepancies when compared to “live” data in the ERP system altered that day.



The data was refreshed daily on a schedule but could also be refreshed upon request. We would say that the data in our reporting db was “current” and often provide the time stamp to define the “as of” date and time. This was also critical in instances where the data refresh was unsuccessful and was therefore no longer current.



I agree that referring to this type of data as “live” or “real-time” would have given the wrong impression. Users often question why they do not see the changes they just made reflected in the data if it is not actually real-time.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Mar 29 at 4:12

























answered Mar 29 at 2:06









PV22PV22

4,736933




4,736933













  • Current seems accurate for sure. I hope our marketing people are ok with that haha

    – cloudpattern
    Mar 29 at 2:22



















  • Current seems accurate for sure. I hope our marketing people are ok with that haha

    – cloudpattern
    Mar 29 at 2:22

















Current seems accurate for sure. I hope our marketing people are ok with that haha

– cloudpattern
Mar 29 at 2:22





Current seems accurate for sure. I hope our marketing people are ok with that haha

– cloudpattern
Mar 29 at 2:22










cloudpattern is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










draft saved

draft discarded


















cloudpattern is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













cloudpattern is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












cloudpattern is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f491789%2fhow-to-say-real-time-in-regards-to-regular-process%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

How did Captain America manage to do this?

迪纳利

南乌拉尔铁路局