Magnifying glass in hyperbolic space












16












$begingroup$


My grandmother used to read with a magnifying glass. What (an ideal) magnifying glass does, is basically a homothety: it scales the picture by some factor. Now, in a hyperbolic space there is no such thing as homothety. So, what a person living in a hyperbolic space would do to improve poor vision?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    They would move out of hyperbolic space into the ambient euclidean space where magnifying glasses scale things properly.
    $endgroup$
    – user21820
    22 hours ago
















16












$begingroup$


My grandmother used to read with a magnifying glass. What (an ideal) magnifying glass does, is basically a homothety: it scales the picture by some factor. Now, in a hyperbolic space there is no such thing as homothety. So, what a person living in a hyperbolic space would do to improve poor vision?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    They would move out of hyperbolic space into the ambient euclidean space where magnifying glasses scale things properly.
    $endgroup$
    – user21820
    22 hours ago














16












16








16


1



$begingroup$


My grandmother used to read with a magnifying glass. What (an ideal) magnifying glass does, is basically a homothety: it scales the picture by some factor. Now, in a hyperbolic space there is no such thing as homothety. So, what a person living in a hyperbolic space would do to improve poor vision?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




My grandmother used to read with a magnifying glass. What (an ideal) magnifying glass does, is basically a homothety: it scales the picture by some factor. Now, in a hyperbolic space there is no such thing as homothety. So, what a person living in a hyperbolic space would do to improve poor vision?







geometry hyperbolic-geometry






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked yesterday









liaombroliaombro

369210




369210












  • $begingroup$
    They would move out of hyperbolic space into the ambient euclidean space where magnifying glasses scale things properly.
    $endgroup$
    – user21820
    22 hours ago


















  • $begingroup$
    They would move out of hyperbolic space into the ambient euclidean space where magnifying glasses scale things properly.
    $endgroup$
    – user21820
    22 hours ago
















$begingroup$
They would move out of hyperbolic space into the ambient euclidean space where magnifying glasses scale things properly.
$endgroup$
– user21820
22 hours ago




$begingroup$
They would move out of hyperbolic space into the ambient euclidean space where magnifying glasses scale things properly.
$endgroup$
– user21820
22 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















16












$begingroup$

What you say will still be true: a magnifying glass will still scale the picture by some factor. Let us say that the scale factor is $ell > 1$.



The difference will be that the scaled picture will no longer be a picture of the old familiar hyperbolic space in which the sectional curvature is $-1$. Instead, it will be a picture of hyperbolic space with curvature $-frac{1}{ell^2}$; I'm using here that the units of curvature are basically $1/text{(length)}^2$.



So, for example, a really powerful magnifying glass with scale factor $ell >!!> 1$ will present a picture of a hyperbolic space whose curvature is nearly zero, being pretty much indistinguishable from Euclidean space.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thanks, fixed. It's just a wikipedia link.
    $endgroup$
    – Lee Mosher
    13 hours ago



















6












$begingroup$

Even though a magnifying glass appears to scale the plane picture you're looking at uniformly, the actual image that forms on your retina lives on (the inside of) a sphere. So that actual image cannot actually be scaled uniformly.



Really, our immediate visual sensations lives not in our 3D space, but in the space of directions emanating from our eye. And that space is a sphere no matter whether the eye itself is embedded in hyperbolic or Euclidean space. More precisely, a sphere in hyperbolic space is always isometric to a sphere in Euclidean space; they just embed differently.



So a hyperbolic creature's retina might well have the same intrinsic geometry as ours does, and so it is completely conceivable that his magnifying glass might transform his visual sensation in the same (imperfect) way that our magnifying glasses do for our eyes.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3154386%2fmagnifying-glass-in-hyperbolic-space%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    16












    $begingroup$

    What you say will still be true: a magnifying glass will still scale the picture by some factor. Let us say that the scale factor is $ell > 1$.



    The difference will be that the scaled picture will no longer be a picture of the old familiar hyperbolic space in which the sectional curvature is $-1$. Instead, it will be a picture of hyperbolic space with curvature $-frac{1}{ell^2}$; I'm using here that the units of curvature are basically $1/text{(length)}^2$.



    So, for example, a really powerful magnifying glass with scale factor $ell >!!> 1$ will present a picture of a hyperbolic space whose curvature is nearly zero, being pretty much indistinguishable from Euclidean space.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      Thanks, fixed. It's just a wikipedia link.
      $endgroup$
      – Lee Mosher
      13 hours ago
















    16












    $begingroup$

    What you say will still be true: a magnifying glass will still scale the picture by some factor. Let us say that the scale factor is $ell > 1$.



    The difference will be that the scaled picture will no longer be a picture of the old familiar hyperbolic space in which the sectional curvature is $-1$. Instead, it will be a picture of hyperbolic space with curvature $-frac{1}{ell^2}$; I'm using here that the units of curvature are basically $1/text{(length)}^2$.



    So, for example, a really powerful magnifying glass with scale factor $ell >!!> 1$ will present a picture of a hyperbolic space whose curvature is nearly zero, being pretty much indistinguishable from Euclidean space.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      Thanks, fixed. It's just a wikipedia link.
      $endgroup$
      – Lee Mosher
      13 hours ago














    16












    16








    16





    $begingroup$

    What you say will still be true: a magnifying glass will still scale the picture by some factor. Let us say that the scale factor is $ell > 1$.



    The difference will be that the scaled picture will no longer be a picture of the old familiar hyperbolic space in which the sectional curvature is $-1$. Instead, it will be a picture of hyperbolic space with curvature $-frac{1}{ell^2}$; I'm using here that the units of curvature are basically $1/text{(length)}^2$.



    So, for example, a really powerful magnifying glass with scale factor $ell >!!> 1$ will present a picture of a hyperbolic space whose curvature is nearly zero, being pretty much indistinguishable from Euclidean space.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    What you say will still be true: a magnifying glass will still scale the picture by some factor. Let us say that the scale factor is $ell > 1$.



    The difference will be that the scaled picture will no longer be a picture of the old familiar hyperbolic space in which the sectional curvature is $-1$. Instead, it will be a picture of hyperbolic space with curvature $-frac{1}{ell^2}$; I'm using here that the units of curvature are basically $1/text{(length)}^2$.



    So, for example, a really powerful magnifying glass with scale factor $ell >!!> 1$ will present a picture of a hyperbolic space whose curvature is nearly zero, being pretty much indistinguishable from Euclidean space.







    share|cite|improve this answer














    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer








    edited 13 hours ago

























    answered yesterday









    Lee MosherLee Mosher

    50.9k33888




    50.9k33888












    • $begingroup$
      Thanks, fixed. It's just a wikipedia link.
      $endgroup$
      – Lee Mosher
      13 hours ago


















    • $begingroup$
      Thanks, fixed. It's just a wikipedia link.
      $endgroup$
      – Lee Mosher
      13 hours ago
















    $begingroup$
    Thanks, fixed. It's just a wikipedia link.
    $endgroup$
    – Lee Mosher
    13 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    Thanks, fixed. It's just a wikipedia link.
    $endgroup$
    – Lee Mosher
    13 hours ago











    6












    $begingroup$

    Even though a magnifying glass appears to scale the plane picture you're looking at uniformly, the actual image that forms on your retina lives on (the inside of) a sphere. So that actual image cannot actually be scaled uniformly.



    Really, our immediate visual sensations lives not in our 3D space, but in the space of directions emanating from our eye. And that space is a sphere no matter whether the eye itself is embedded in hyperbolic or Euclidean space. More precisely, a sphere in hyperbolic space is always isometric to a sphere in Euclidean space; they just embed differently.



    So a hyperbolic creature's retina might well have the same intrinsic geometry as ours does, and so it is completely conceivable that his magnifying glass might transform his visual sensation in the same (imperfect) way that our magnifying glasses do for our eyes.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      6












      $begingroup$

      Even though a magnifying glass appears to scale the plane picture you're looking at uniformly, the actual image that forms on your retina lives on (the inside of) a sphere. So that actual image cannot actually be scaled uniformly.



      Really, our immediate visual sensations lives not in our 3D space, but in the space of directions emanating from our eye. And that space is a sphere no matter whether the eye itself is embedded in hyperbolic or Euclidean space. More precisely, a sphere in hyperbolic space is always isometric to a sphere in Euclidean space; they just embed differently.



      So a hyperbolic creature's retina might well have the same intrinsic geometry as ours does, and so it is completely conceivable that his magnifying glass might transform his visual sensation in the same (imperfect) way that our magnifying glasses do for our eyes.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        6












        6








        6





        $begingroup$

        Even though a magnifying glass appears to scale the plane picture you're looking at uniformly, the actual image that forms on your retina lives on (the inside of) a sphere. So that actual image cannot actually be scaled uniformly.



        Really, our immediate visual sensations lives not in our 3D space, but in the space of directions emanating from our eye. And that space is a sphere no matter whether the eye itself is embedded in hyperbolic or Euclidean space. More precisely, a sphere in hyperbolic space is always isometric to a sphere in Euclidean space; they just embed differently.



        So a hyperbolic creature's retina might well have the same intrinsic geometry as ours does, and so it is completely conceivable that his magnifying glass might transform his visual sensation in the same (imperfect) way that our magnifying glasses do for our eyes.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        Even though a magnifying glass appears to scale the plane picture you're looking at uniformly, the actual image that forms on your retina lives on (the inside of) a sphere. So that actual image cannot actually be scaled uniformly.



        Really, our immediate visual sensations lives not in our 3D space, but in the space of directions emanating from our eye. And that space is a sphere no matter whether the eye itself is embedded in hyperbolic or Euclidean space. More precisely, a sphere in hyperbolic space is always isometric to a sphere in Euclidean space; they just embed differently.



        So a hyperbolic creature's retina might well have the same intrinsic geometry as ours does, and so it is completely conceivable that his magnifying glass might transform his visual sensation in the same (imperfect) way that our magnifying glasses do for our eyes.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered yesterday









        Henning MakholmHenning Makholm

        242k17308550




        242k17308550






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3154386%2fmagnifying-glass-in-hyperbolic-space%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            How did Captain America manage to do this?

            迪纳利

            南乌拉尔铁路局