What's the difference between the server version and the desktop version?
What's the difference between the server version of Ubuntu and the desktop version?
distro-recommendation
edited Nov 21 '12 at 21:35
Bruno Pereira
59.5k26179207
asked Mar 19 '11 at 15:02
oneat
711268
migrated from unix.stackexchange.com Mar 19 '11 at 15:35
This question came from our site for users of Linux, FreeBSD and other Un*x-like operating systems.
add a comment |
What's the difference between the server version of Ubuntu and the desktop version?
distro-recommendation
edited Nov 21 '12 at 21:35
Bruno Pereira
59.5k26179207
asked Mar 19 '11 at 15:02
oneat
711268
migrated from unix.stackexchange.com Mar 19 '11 at 15:35
This question came from our site for users of Linux, FreeBSD and other Un*x-like operating systems.
1
which one is better? I have an Acer Aspire One 1gb RAM, 1,60GHZ processor... It's an old computer, but I've always used Ubuntu distros with it. I recently installed Ubuntu 12.10 and it's too slow for my computer. In addition to this, I need to install Atlas.TI to process some surveys. I've been unable to due to the 12.10 version... It worked just perfectly when the 10,04 version was intalled in my machine Thanks. Sammaël
– user170239
Jun 25 '13 at 20:42
add a comment |
What's the difference between the server version of Ubuntu and the desktop version?
distro-recommendation
edited Nov 21 '12 at 21:35
Bruno Pereira
59.5k26179207
asked Mar 19 '11 at 15:02
oneat
711268
What's the difference between the server version of Ubuntu and the desktop version?
distro-recommendation
distro-recommendation
edited Nov 21 '12 at 21:35
Bruno Pereira
59.5k26179207
asked Mar 19 '11 at 15:02
oneat
711268
edited Nov 21 '12 at 21:35
Bruno Pereira
59.5k26179207
asked Mar 19 '11 at 15:02
oneat
711268
edited Nov 21 '12 at 21:35
Bruno Pereira
59.5k26179207
edited Nov 21 '12 at 21:35
Bruno Pereira
59.5k26179207
edited Nov 21 '12 at 21:35
Bruno Pereira
59.5k26179207
59.5k26179207
asked Mar 19 '11 at 15:02
oneat
711268
asked Mar 19 '11 at 15:02
oneat
711268
asked Mar 19 '11 at 15:02
oneat
711268
711268
migrated from unix.stackexchange.com Mar 19 '11 at 15:35
This question came from our site for users of Linux, FreeBSD and other Un*x-like operating systems.
migrated from unix.stackexchange.com Mar 19 '11 at 15:35
This question came from our site for users of Linux, FreeBSD and other Un*x-like operating systems.
1
which one is better? I have an Acer Aspire One 1gb RAM, 1,60GHZ processor... It's an old computer, but I've always used Ubuntu distros with it. I recently installed Ubuntu 12.10 and it's too slow for my computer. In addition to this, I need to install Atlas.TI to process some surveys. I've been unable to due to the 12.10 version... It worked just perfectly when the 10,04 version was intalled in my machine Thanks. Sammaël
– user170239
Jun 25 '13 at 20:42
add a comment |
1
which one is better? I have an Acer Aspire One 1gb RAM, 1,60GHZ processor... It's an old computer, but I've always used Ubuntu distros with it. I recently installed Ubuntu 12.10 and it's too slow for my computer. In addition to this, I need to install Atlas.TI to process some surveys. I've been unable to due to the 12.10 version... It worked just perfectly when the 10,04 version was intalled in my machine Thanks. Sammaël
– user170239
Jun 25 '13 at 20:42
1
1
which one is better? I have an Acer Aspire One 1gb RAM, 1,60GHZ processor... It's an old computer, but I've always used Ubuntu distros with it. I recently installed Ubuntu 12.10 and it's too slow for my computer. In addition to this, I need to install Atlas.TI to process some surveys. I've been unable to due to the 12.10 version... It worked just perfectly when the 10,04 version was intalled in my machine Thanks. Sammaël
– user170239
Jun 25 '13 at 20:42
which one is better? I have an Acer Aspire One 1gb RAM, 1,60GHZ processor... It's an old computer, but I've always used Ubuntu distros with it. I recently installed Ubuntu 12.10 and it's too slow for my computer. In addition to this, I need to install Atlas.TI to process some surveys. I've been unable to due to the 12.10 version... It worked just perfectly when the 10,04 version was intalled in my machine Thanks. Sammaël
– user170239
Jun 25 '13 at 20:42
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
Copied as-is from Ubuntu docs:
- The first difference is in the CD contents. The "Server" CD avoids including what Ubuntu considers desktop packages (packages like X, Gnome or KDE), but does include server related packages (Apache2, Bind9 and so on). Using a Desktop CD with a minimal installation and installing, for example, apache2 from the network, one can obtain the exact same result that can be obtained by inserting the Server CD and installing apache2 from the CD-ROM.
- The Ubuntu Server Edition installation process is slightly different from the Desktop Edition. Since by default Ubuntu Server doesn't have a GUI, the process is menu driven, very similar to the Alternate CD installation process.
- Before 12.04, Ubuntu server installs a server-optimized kernel by default. Since 12.04, there is no difference in kernel between Ubuntu Desktop and Ubuntu Server since linux-image-server is merged into linux-image-generic.
- For Ubuntu LTS releases before 12.04, the Ubuntu Desktop Edition only receives 3 years of support. This was increased to 5 years in Ubuntu LTS 12.04 In contrast, all Ubuntu LTS Server Edition releases are supported for 5 years.
add a comment |
It's worth noting that other than the kernel settings, Ubuntu Desktop and Server are essentially the same distribution, just with different default package selection. They both use the same packages and respositories. If you run apt-get install ubuntu-desktop you will end up with the functional equivalent of Desktop Edition.
That also means that any package that's intended for Ubuntu Server will run just as happily on your desktop installation.
answered Mar 20 '11 at 1:49
Mark Russell
6,83823135
add a comment |
Whether you install using a server CD, or a desktop CD, you end up with the same Ubuntu. The difference is in what selection of packages it installs by default - that is - what software selection you end up with at the end of the installation process.
It is possible to move from a desktop system to a server system and vice-versa on an already-installed copy of Ubuntu. Ubuntu even makes it relatively easy with the tasksel utility or with meta-packages like ubuntu-desktop and ubuntu-server (available through the standard apt package manager at least as of 16.04). You can even mix and match - installing a desktop environment on a server or server software such as ssh_server or apache2 on a primarily desktop computer.
But chances are, you probably already know at install time whether you want a desktop system complete with desktop environment, or a server system. So having different installation CDs for server and desktop is simply a convenience factor that makes software selection just a bit simpler.
The installers also behave differently, in the sense that only the "desktop" version installs from a graphical Live CD. The other versions install using a menu-based installer similar to Debian's installer.
edited Sep 17 '17 at 2:21
maxMak
32
answered Apr 27 '12 at 7:26
thomasrutter
26.4k46389
At least in 10.04, I can find noubuntu-serverpackage. Though it might have been cool, you probably want to just just install the servers you want anyway.
– Blaisorblade
Nov 18 '13 at 20:50
1
I've updated my answer. You use tasks (via tasksel) rather than meta-packages to install the server packages. Runsudo taskselfor user interface or install individual tasks via command line likesudo tasksel install lamp-server. List of other tasks available at help.ubuntu.com/community/Tasksel Note that these are groups of packages designed for a "starting point" server deployment. You may want to install packages on a more granular basis.
– thomasrutter
Nov 19 '13 at 0:34
I totally spaced off taskel. Still valid in 16.04 LTS. Makes server packages easily installable as well as Desktop packages. +1
– Terrance
Jan 16 '17 at 15:39
add a comment |
protected by jokerdino♦ Sep 19 '16 at 13:28
Thank you for your interest in this question.
Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).
Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Copied as-is from Ubuntu docs:
- The first difference is in the CD contents. The "Server" CD avoids including what Ubuntu considers desktop packages (packages like X, Gnome or KDE), but does include server related packages (Apache2, Bind9 and so on). Using a Desktop CD with a minimal installation and installing, for example, apache2 from the network, one can obtain the exact same result that can be obtained by inserting the Server CD and installing apache2 from the CD-ROM.
- The Ubuntu Server Edition installation process is slightly different from the Desktop Edition. Since by default Ubuntu Server doesn't have a GUI, the process is menu driven, very similar to the Alternate CD installation process.
- Before 12.04, Ubuntu server installs a server-optimized kernel by default. Since 12.04, there is no difference in kernel between Ubuntu Desktop and Ubuntu Server since linux-image-server is merged into linux-image-generic.
- For Ubuntu LTS releases before 12.04, the Ubuntu Desktop Edition only receives 3 years of support. This was increased to 5 years in Ubuntu LTS 12.04 In contrast, all Ubuntu LTS Server Edition releases are supported for 5 years.
add a comment |
Copied as-is from Ubuntu docs:
- The first difference is in the CD contents. The "Server" CD avoids including what Ubuntu considers desktop packages (packages like X, Gnome or KDE), but does include server related packages (Apache2, Bind9 and so on). Using a Desktop CD with a minimal installation and installing, for example, apache2 from the network, one can obtain the exact same result that can be obtained by inserting the Server CD and installing apache2 from the CD-ROM.
- The Ubuntu Server Edition installation process is slightly different from the Desktop Edition. Since by default Ubuntu Server doesn't have a GUI, the process is menu driven, very similar to the Alternate CD installation process.
- Before 12.04, Ubuntu server installs a server-optimized kernel by default. Since 12.04, there is no difference in kernel between Ubuntu Desktop and Ubuntu Server since linux-image-server is merged into linux-image-generic.
- For Ubuntu LTS releases before 12.04, the Ubuntu Desktop Edition only receives 3 years of support. This was increased to 5 years in Ubuntu LTS 12.04 In contrast, all Ubuntu LTS Server Edition releases are supported for 5 years.
add a comment |
Copied as-is from Ubuntu docs:
- The first difference is in the CD contents. The "Server" CD avoids including what Ubuntu considers desktop packages (packages like X, Gnome or KDE), but does include server related packages (Apache2, Bind9 and so on). Using a Desktop CD with a minimal installation and installing, for example, apache2 from the network, one can obtain the exact same result that can be obtained by inserting the Server CD and installing apache2 from the CD-ROM.
- The Ubuntu Server Edition installation process is slightly different from the Desktop Edition. Since by default Ubuntu Server doesn't have a GUI, the process is menu driven, very similar to the Alternate CD installation process.
- Before 12.04, Ubuntu server installs a server-optimized kernel by default. Since 12.04, there is no difference in kernel between Ubuntu Desktop and Ubuntu Server since linux-image-server is merged into linux-image-generic.
- For Ubuntu LTS releases before 12.04, the Ubuntu Desktop Edition only receives 3 years of support. This was increased to 5 years in Ubuntu LTS 12.04 In contrast, all Ubuntu LTS Server Edition releases are supported for 5 years.
Copied as-is from Ubuntu docs:
- The first difference is in the CD contents. The "Server" CD avoids including what Ubuntu considers desktop packages (packages like X, Gnome or KDE), but does include server related packages (Apache2, Bind9 and so on). Using a Desktop CD with a minimal installation and installing, for example, apache2 from the network, one can obtain the exact same result that can be obtained by inserting the Server CD and installing apache2 from the CD-ROM.
- The Ubuntu Server Edition installation process is slightly different from the Desktop Edition. Since by default Ubuntu Server doesn't have a GUI, the process is menu driven, very similar to the Alternate CD installation process.
- Before 12.04, Ubuntu server installs a server-optimized kernel by default. Since 12.04, there is no difference in kernel between Ubuntu Desktop and Ubuntu Server since linux-image-server is merged into linux-image-generic.
- For Ubuntu LTS releases before 12.04, the Ubuntu Desktop Edition only receives 3 years of support. This was increased to 5 years in Ubuntu LTS 12.04 In contrast, all Ubuntu LTS Server Edition releases are supported for 5 years.
edited Feb 17 '13 at 9:39
community wiki
2 revs, 2 users 82%
Tshepang
add a comment |
add a comment |
It's worth noting that other than the kernel settings, Ubuntu Desktop and Server are essentially the same distribution, just with different default package selection. They both use the same packages and respositories. If you run apt-get install ubuntu-desktop you will end up with the functional equivalent of Desktop Edition.
That also means that any package that's intended for Ubuntu Server will run just as happily on your desktop installation.
answered Mar 20 '11 at 1:49
Mark Russell
6,83823135
add a comment |
It's worth noting that other than the kernel settings, Ubuntu Desktop and Server are essentially the same distribution, just with different default package selection. They both use the same packages and respositories. If you run apt-get install ubuntu-desktop you will end up with the functional equivalent of Desktop Edition.
That also means that any package that's intended for Ubuntu Server will run just as happily on your desktop installation.
answered Mar 20 '11 at 1:49
Mark Russell
6,83823135
add a comment |
It's worth noting that other than the kernel settings, Ubuntu Desktop and Server are essentially the same distribution, just with different default package selection. They both use the same packages and respositories. If you run apt-get install ubuntu-desktop you will end up with the functional equivalent of Desktop Edition.
That also means that any package that's intended for Ubuntu Server will run just as happily on your desktop installation.
answered Mar 20 '11 at 1:49
Mark Russell
6,83823135
It's worth noting that other than the kernel settings, Ubuntu Desktop and Server are essentially the same distribution, just with different default package selection. They both use the same packages and respositories. If you run apt-get install ubuntu-desktop you will end up with the functional equivalent of Desktop Edition.
That also means that any package that's intended for Ubuntu Server will run just as happily on your desktop installation.
answered Mar 20 '11 at 1:49
Mark Russell
6,83823135
answered Mar 20 '11 at 1:49
Mark Russell
6,83823135
answered Mar 20 '11 at 1:49
Mark Russell
6,83823135
answered Mar 20 '11 at 1:49
Mark Russell
6,83823135
6,83823135
add a comment |
add a comment |
Whether you install using a server CD, or a desktop CD, you end up with the same Ubuntu. The difference is in what selection of packages it installs by default - that is - what software selection you end up with at the end of the installation process.
It is possible to move from a desktop system to a server system and vice-versa on an already-installed copy of Ubuntu. Ubuntu even makes it relatively easy with the tasksel utility or with meta-packages like ubuntu-desktop and ubuntu-server (available through the standard apt package manager at least as of 16.04). You can even mix and match - installing a desktop environment on a server or server software such as ssh_server or apache2 on a primarily desktop computer.
But chances are, you probably already know at install time whether you want a desktop system complete with desktop environment, or a server system. So having different installation CDs for server and desktop is simply a convenience factor that makes software selection just a bit simpler.
The installers also behave differently, in the sense that only the "desktop" version installs from a graphical Live CD. The other versions install using a menu-based installer similar to Debian's installer.
edited Sep 17 '17 at 2:21
maxMak
32
answered Apr 27 '12 at 7:26
thomasrutter
26.4k46389
At least in 10.04, I can find noubuntu-serverpackage. Though it might have been cool, you probably want to just just install the servers you want anyway.
– Blaisorblade
Nov 18 '13 at 20:50
1
I've updated my answer. You use tasks (via tasksel) rather than meta-packages to install the server packages. Runsudo taskselfor user interface or install individual tasks via command line likesudo tasksel install lamp-server. List of other tasks available at help.ubuntu.com/community/Tasksel Note that these are groups of packages designed for a "starting point" server deployment. You may want to install packages on a more granular basis.
– thomasrutter
Nov 19 '13 at 0:34
I totally spaced off taskel. Still valid in 16.04 LTS. Makes server packages easily installable as well as Desktop packages. +1
– Terrance
Jan 16 '17 at 15:39
add a comment |
Whether you install using a server CD, or a desktop CD, you end up with the same Ubuntu. The difference is in what selection of packages it installs by default - that is - what software selection you end up with at the end of the installation process.
It is possible to move from a desktop system to a server system and vice-versa on an already-installed copy of Ubuntu. Ubuntu even makes it relatively easy with the tasksel utility or with meta-packages like ubuntu-desktop and ubuntu-server (available through the standard apt package manager at least as of 16.04). You can even mix and match - installing a desktop environment on a server or server software such as ssh_server or apache2 on a primarily desktop computer.
But chances are, you probably already know at install time whether you want a desktop system complete with desktop environment, or a server system. So having different installation CDs for server and desktop is simply a convenience factor that makes software selection just a bit simpler.
The installers also behave differently, in the sense that only the "desktop" version installs from a graphical Live CD. The other versions install using a menu-based installer similar to Debian's installer.
edited Sep 17 '17 at 2:21
maxMak
32
answered Apr 27 '12 at 7:26
thomasrutter
26.4k46389
At least in 10.04, I can find noubuntu-serverpackage. Though it might have been cool, you probably want to just just install the servers you want anyway.
– Blaisorblade
Nov 18 '13 at 20:50
1
I've updated my answer. You use tasks (via tasksel) rather than meta-packages to install the server packages. Runsudo taskselfor user interface or install individual tasks via command line likesudo tasksel install lamp-server. List of other tasks available at help.ubuntu.com/community/Tasksel Note that these are groups of packages designed for a "starting point" server deployment. You may want to install packages on a more granular basis.
– thomasrutter
Nov 19 '13 at 0:34
I totally spaced off taskel. Still valid in 16.04 LTS. Makes server packages easily installable as well as Desktop packages. +1
– Terrance
Jan 16 '17 at 15:39
add a comment |
Whether you install using a server CD, or a desktop CD, you end up with the same Ubuntu. The difference is in what selection of packages it installs by default - that is - what software selection you end up with at the end of the installation process.
It is possible to move from a desktop system to a server system and vice-versa on an already-installed copy of Ubuntu. Ubuntu even makes it relatively easy with the tasksel utility or with meta-packages like ubuntu-desktop and ubuntu-server (available through the standard apt package manager at least as of 16.04). You can even mix and match - installing a desktop environment on a server or server software such as ssh_server or apache2 on a primarily desktop computer.
But chances are, you probably already know at install time whether you want a desktop system complete with desktop environment, or a server system. So having different installation CDs for server and desktop is simply a convenience factor that makes software selection just a bit simpler.
The installers also behave differently, in the sense that only the "desktop" version installs from a graphical Live CD. The other versions install using a menu-based installer similar to Debian's installer.
edited Sep 17 '17 at 2:21
maxMak
32
answered Apr 27 '12 at 7:26
thomasrutter
26.4k46389
Whether you install using a server CD, or a desktop CD, you end up with the same Ubuntu. The difference is in what selection of packages it installs by default - that is - what software selection you end up with at the end of the installation process.
It is possible to move from a desktop system to a server system and vice-versa on an already-installed copy of Ubuntu. Ubuntu even makes it relatively easy with the tasksel utility or with meta-packages like ubuntu-desktop and ubuntu-server (available through the standard apt package manager at least as of 16.04). You can even mix and match - installing a desktop environment on a server or server software such as ssh_server or apache2 on a primarily desktop computer.
But chances are, you probably already know at install time whether you want a desktop system complete with desktop environment, or a server system. So having different installation CDs for server and desktop is simply a convenience factor that makes software selection just a bit simpler.
The installers also behave differently, in the sense that only the "desktop" version installs from a graphical Live CD. The other versions install using a menu-based installer similar to Debian's installer.
edited Sep 17 '17 at 2:21
maxMak
32
answered Apr 27 '12 at 7:26
thomasrutter
26.4k46389
edited Sep 17 '17 at 2:21
maxMak
32
edited Sep 17 '17 at 2:21
maxMak
32
edited Sep 17 '17 at 2:21
maxMak
32
32
answered Apr 27 '12 at 7:26
thomasrutter
26.4k46389
answered Apr 27 '12 at 7:26
thomasrutter
26.4k46389
answered Apr 27 '12 at 7:26
thomasrutter
26.4k46389
26.4k46389
At least in 10.04, I can find noubuntu-serverpackage. Though it might have been cool, you probably want to just just install the servers you want anyway.
– Blaisorblade
Nov 18 '13 at 20:50
1
I've updated my answer. You use tasks (via tasksel) rather than meta-packages to install the server packages. Runsudo taskselfor user interface or install individual tasks via command line likesudo tasksel install lamp-server. List of other tasks available at help.ubuntu.com/community/Tasksel Note that these are groups of packages designed for a "starting point" server deployment. You may want to install packages on a more granular basis.
– thomasrutter
Nov 19 '13 at 0:34
I totally spaced off taskel. Still valid in 16.04 LTS. Makes server packages easily installable as well as Desktop packages. +1
– Terrance
Jan 16 '17 at 15:39
add a comment |
At least in 10.04, I can find noubuntu-serverpackage. Though it might have been cool, you probably want to just just install the servers you want anyway.
– Blaisorblade
Nov 18 '13 at 20:50
1
I've updated my answer. You use tasks (via tasksel) rather than meta-packages to install the server packages. Runsudo taskselfor user interface or install individual tasks via command line likesudo tasksel install lamp-server. List of other tasks available at help.ubuntu.com/community/Tasksel Note that these are groups of packages designed for a "starting point" server deployment. You may want to install packages on a more granular basis.
– thomasrutter
Nov 19 '13 at 0:34
I totally spaced off taskel. Still valid in 16.04 LTS. Makes server packages easily installable as well as Desktop packages. +1
– Terrance
Jan 16 '17 at 15:39
At least in 10.04, I can find no
ubuntu-server package. Though it might have been cool, you probably want to just just install the servers you want anyway.– Blaisorblade
Nov 18 '13 at 20:50
At least in 10.04, I can find no
ubuntu-server package. Though it might have been cool, you probably want to just just install the servers you want anyway.– Blaisorblade
Nov 18 '13 at 20:50
1
1
I've updated my answer. You use tasks (via tasksel) rather than meta-packages to install the server packages. Run
sudo tasksel for user interface or install individual tasks via command line like sudo tasksel install lamp-server. List of other tasks available at help.ubuntu.com/community/Tasksel Note that these are groups of packages designed for a "starting point" server deployment. You may want to install packages on a more granular basis.– thomasrutter
Nov 19 '13 at 0:34
I've updated my answer. You use tasks (via tasksel) rather than meta-packages to install the server packages. Run
sudo tasksel for user interface or install individual tasks via command line like sudo tasksel install lamp-server. List of other tasks available at help.ubuntu.com/community/Tasksel Note that these are groups of packages designed for a "starting point" server deployment. You may want to install packages on a more granular basis.– thomasrutter
Nov 19 '13 at 0:34
I totally spaced off taskel. Still valid in 16.04 LTS. Makes server packages easily installable as well as Desktop packages. +1
– Terrance
Jan 16 '17 at 15:39
I totally spaced off taskel. Still valid in 16.04 LTS. Makes server packages easily installable as well as Desktop packages. +1
– Terrance
Jan 16 '17 at 15:39
add a comment |
protected by jokerdino♦ Sep 19 '16 at 13:28
Thank you for your interest in this question.
Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).
Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?
1
which one is better? I have an Acer Aspire One 1gb RAM, 1,60GHZ processor... It's an old computer, but I've always used Ubuntu distros with it. I recently installed Ubuntu 12.10 and it's too slow for my computer. In addition to this, I need to install Atlas.TI to process some surveys. I've been unable to due to the 12.10 version... It worked just perfectly when the 10,04 version was intalled in my machine Thanks. Sammaël
– user170239
Jun 25 '13 at 20:42