Reported speech commands - negations which aren't related to subject

Multi tool use
First my english ain't pretty good but I hope you can understand me. :)
So at the moment I'm doing my homework and I'm pre-finished with it but 2 sentences are very difficult for the exercise.
I need to put commands in direct speech to the reported speech.
For example:
Mother: Don't lose your passport. Keep it somewhere safe.
-> My mother told me not to lose my passport. She told me to keep it somewhere safe.
That's pretty simple but this sentence the negation are not related to the subject or I don't know how I can can describe this ... :/
Mother: Take a present for your French family. It doesn't have to be something expensive.
-> My mother told me to take a present for my French family.
But she told me it not have to be something expensive.
I think that's wrong because it sounds wrong .. :/
Do I need it in this way: ....
But she told me that it doesn't have to be expensive or something like this?
Kinda weird grammar :/
And this sentence is also difficult:
Mother: The journey won't feel so long.
Does anyone has any solutions?:)
regards
negation indirect-speech imperative
add a comment |
First my english ain't pretty good but I hope you can understand me. :)
So at the moment I'm doing my homework and I'm pre-finished with it but 2 sentences are very difficult for the exercise.
I need to put commands in direct speech to the reported speech.
For example:
Mother: Don't lose your passport. Keep it somewhere safe.
-> My mother told me not to lose my passport. She told me to keep it somewhere safe.
That's pretty simple but this sentence the negation are not related to the subject or I don't know how I can can describe this ... :/
Mother: Take a present for your French family. It doesn't have to be something expensive.
-> My mother told me to take a present for my French family.
But she told me it not have to be something expensive.
I think that's wrong because it sounds wrong .. :/
Do I need it in this way: ....
But she told me that it doesn't have to be expensive or something like this?
Kinda weird grammar :/
And this sentence is also difficult:
Mother: The journey won't feel so long.
Does anyone has any solutions?:)
regards
negation indirect-speech imperative
add a comment |
First my english ain't pretty good but I hope you can understand me. :)
So at the moment I'm doing my homework and I'm pre-finished with it but 2 sentences are very difficult for the exercise.
I need to put commands in direct speech to the reported speech.
For example:
Mother: Don't lose your passport. Keep it somewhere safe.
-> My mother told me not to lose my passport. She told me to keep it somewhere safe.
That's pretty simple but this sentence the negation are not related to the subject or I don't know how I can can describe this ... :/
Mother: Take a present for your French family. It doesn't have to be something expensive.
-> My mother told me to take a present for my French family.
But she told me it not have to be something expensive.
I think that's wrong because it sounds wrong .. :/
Do I need it in this way: ....
But she told me that it doesn't have to be expensive or something like this?
Kinda weird grammar :/
And this sentence is also difficult:
Mother: The journey won't feel so long.
Does anyone has any solutions?:)
regards
negation indirect-speech imperative
First my english ain't pretty good but I hope you can understand me. :)
So at the moment I'm doing my homework and I'm pre-finished with it but 2 sentences are very difficult for the exercise.
I need to put commands in direct speech to the reported speech.
For example:
Mother: Don't lose your passport. Keep it somewhere safe.
-> My mother told me not to lose my passport. She told me to keep it somewhere safe.
That's pretty simple but this sentence the negation are not related to the subject or I don't know how I can can describe this ... :/
Mother: Take a present for your French family. It doesn't have to be something expensive.
-> My mother told me to take a present for my French family.
But she told me it not have to be something expensive.
I think that's wrong because it sounds wrong .. :/
Do I need it in this way: ....
But she told me that it doesn't have to be expensive or something like this?
Kinda weird grammar :/
And this sentence is also difficult:
Mother: The journey won't feel so long.
Does anyone has any solutions?:)
regards
negation indirect-speech imperative
negation indirect-speech imperative
edited 15 mins ago


Laurel
31.6k660112
31.6k660112
asked Dec 3 '13 at 17:40
hookieV2hookieV2
82
82
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
But she told me [that] it did not have to be something expensive.
In your example, the person who receives the command (me) is not the same as the primary argument (it) of the verb that describes the action to be taken (have to be...), as you say. For that reason, you cannot use [told + person spoken to + to + infinitive], but you rather need to use a full subordinate clause starting with that (which word can be omitted) and an actual subject + finite verb, in this case it + did.
She told me [that] the journey would't feel so long.
Generally, the finite verb in the subordinate clauses will be in the past tense if the main clause is also in the past tense, although the present tense (won't) is probably also acceptable.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f140211%2freported-speech-commands-negations-which-arent-related-to-subject%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
But she told me [that] it did not have to be something expensive.
In your example, the person who receives the command (me) is not the same as the primary argument (it) of the verb that describes the action to be taken (have to be...), as you say. For that reason, you cannot use [told + person spoken to + to + infinitive], but you rather need to use a full subordinate clause starting with that (which word can be omitted) and an actual subject + finite verb, in this case it + did.
She told me [that] the journey would't feel so long.
Generally, the finite verb in the subordinate clauses will be in the past tense if the main clause is also in the past tense, although the present tense (won't) is probably also acceptable.
add a comment |
But she told me [that] it did not have to be something expensive.
In your example, the person who receives the command (me) is not the same as the primary argument (it) of the verb that describes the action to be taken (have to be...), as you say. For that reason, you cannot use [told + person spoken to + to + infinitive], but you rather need to use a full subordinate clause starting with that (which word can be omitted) and an actual subject + finite verb, in this case it + did.
She told me [that] the journey would't feel so long.
Generally, the finite verb in the subordinate clauses will be in the past tense if the main clause is also in the past tense, although the present tense (won't) is probably also acceptable.
add a comment |
But she told me [that] it did not have to be something expensive.
In your example, the person who receives the command (me) is not the same as the primary argument (it) of the verb that describes the action to be taken (have to be...), as you say. For that reason, you cannot use [told + person spoken to + to + infinitive], but you rather need to use a full subordinate clause starting with that (which word can be omitted) and an actual subject + finite verb, in this case it + did.
She told me [that] the journey would't feel so long.
Generally, the finite verb in the subordinate clauses will be in the past tense if the main clause is also in the past tense, although the present tense (won't) is probably also acceptable.
But she told me [that] it did not have to be something expensive.
In your example, the person who receives the command (me) is not the same as the primary argument (it) of the verb that describes the action to be taken (have to be...), as you say. For that reason, you cannot use [told + person spoken to + to + infinitive], but you rather need to use a full subordinate clause starting with that (which word can be omitted) and an actual subject + finite verb, in this case it + did.
She told me [that] the journey would't feel so long.
Generally, the finite verb in the subordinate clauses will be in the past tense if the main clause is also in the past tense, although the present tense (won't) is probably also acceptable.
answered Dec 3 '13 at 18:18
CerberusCerberus
53.9k2119206
53.9k2119206
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f140211%2freported-speech-commands-negations-which-arent-related-to-subject%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
z9uVBmt69iQaIqPt B zXPkUoPGhVdAU9Mxkv6OpO6NDW,e1WN0fK5sw,H9x,kcKz5 VBTqxKlB2ZEuEoiUFx wuzSuk