What is the dot in “1.2.4."












9












$begingroup$


I am not a mathematician. I did additional maths O’level back in the stone age but did not pursue maths further (much to my regret).



I am reading David Acheson’s fascinating book ‘The Story of Calculus’ and have just about kept up till I got a use of ‘.’ (dot) that I do not understand. It is in his Chapter 14 ‘an Enigma’ and first occurs here in the context of chain rule:-




Suppose, for instance, thar y is some function of x, and that x itself is a function of some other variable - say t. Then we can, if we wish, consider y as a function of t, and then
dy/dt=dy/dx.dx/dt




What is the dot doing? I looked at the suggested previous questions about the dot without success. Does it mean and (as it does in propositional logic, where P.Q stands for P&Q?



The (or a) mysterious dot corps up again in Chapter 23, about e numbers, on the topic of the Taylor series. Here we find the series




*e^x=1+x+^2/1.2+x^3/1.2.3+...




What is the dot doing here, please? Is it in some way a concatenation? Or what is it?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 12




    $begingroup$
    Sometimes a dot is used for multiplication
    $endgroup$
    – J. W. Tanner
    9 hours ago








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Such a use of a dot when used for multiplication however usually occurs centered vertically as such: $acdot b$ typed as a cdot b as opposed to lower like a decimal point as such: $a.b$.
    $endgroup$
    – JMoravitz
    9 hours ago








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I'm not sure which is more common, but I've certainly seen a number of posts here on MSE that use a period dot to indicate multiplication. I've only ever used a centered dot myself, though.
    $endgroup$
    – Clayton
    9 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    If you just type acdot b without initiating mathmode, it doesn't do anything special of course... you need to initiate mathmode first using dollar signs like $acdot b$. See more about how to type with MathJax and $LaTeX$ here by visiting this tutorial
    $endgroup$
    – JMoravitz
    9 hours ago






  • 5




    $begingroup$
    In my (almost entirely English-language) experience the lowered dot for multiplication is used in British sources. Acheson is British.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Lugo
    8 hours ago
















9












$begingroup$


I am not a mathematician. I did additional maths O’level back in the stone age but did not pursue maths further (much to my regret).



I am reading David Acheson’s fascinating book ‘The Story of Calculus’ and have just about kept up till I got a use of ‘.’ (dot) that I do not understand. It is in his Chapter 14 ‘an Enigma’ and first occurs here in the context of chain rule:-




Suppose, for instance, thar y is some function of x, and that x itself is a function of some other variable - say t. Then we can, if we wish, consider y as a function of t, and then
dy/dt=dy/dx.dx/dt




What is the dot doing? I looked at the suggested previous questions about the dot without success. Does it mean and (as it does in propositional logic, where P.Q stands for P&Q?



The (or a) mysterious dot corps up again in Chapter 23, about e numbers, on the topic of the Taylor series. Here we find the series




*e^x=1+x+^2/1.2+x^3/1.2.3+...




What is the dot doing here, please? Is it in some way a concatenation? Or what is it?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 12




    $begingroup$
    Sometimes a dot is used for multiplication
    $endgroup$
    – J. W. Tanner
    9 hours ago








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Such a use of a dot when used for multiplication however usually occurs centered vertically as such: $acdot b$ typed as a cdot b as opposed to lower like a decimal point as such: $a.b$.
    $endgroup$
    – JMoravitz
    9 hours ago








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I'm not sure which is more common, but I've certainly seen a number of posts here on MSE that use a period dot to indicate multiplication. I've only ever used a centered dot myself, though.
    $endgroup$
    – Clayton
    9 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    If you just type acdot b without initiating mathmode, it doesn't do anything special of course... you need to initiate mathmode first using dollar signs like $acdot b$. See more about how to type with MathJax and $LaTeX$ here by visiting this tutorial
    $endgroup$
    – JMoravitz
    9 hours ago






  • 5




    $begingroup$
    In my (almost entirely English-language) experience the lowered dot for multiplication is used in British sources. Acheson is British.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Lugo
    8 hours ago














9












9








9


1



$begingroup$


I am not a mathematician. I did additional maths O’level back in the stone age but did not pursue maths further (much to my regret).



I am reading David Acheson’s fascinating book ‘The Story of Calculus’ and have just about kept up till I got a use of ‘.’ (dot) that I do not understand. It is in his Chapter 14 ‘an Enigma’ and first occurs here in the context of chain rule:-




Suppose, for instance, thar y is some function of x, and that x itself is a function of some other variable - say t. Then we can, if we wish, consider y as a function of t, and then
dy/dt=dy/dx.dx/dt




What is the dot doing? I looked at the suggested previous questions about the dot without success. Does it mean and (as it does in propositional logic, where P.Q stands for P&Q?



The (or a) mysterious dot corps up again in Chapter 23, about e numbers, on the topic of the Taylor series. Here we find the series




*e^x=1+x+^2/1.2+x^3/1.2.3+...




What is the dot doing here, please? Is it in some way a concatenation? Or what is it?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




I am not a mathematician. I did additional maths O’level back in the stone age but did not pursue maths further (much to my regret).



I am reading David Acheson’s fascinating book ‘The Story of Calculus’ and have just about kept up till I got a use of ‘.’ (dot) that I do not understand. It is in his Chapter 14 ‘an Enigma’ and first occurs here in the context of chain rule:-




Suppose, for instance, thar y is some function of x, and that x itself is a function of some other variable - say t. Then we can, if we wish, consider y as a function of t, and then
dy/dt=dy/dx.dx/dt




What is the dot doing? I looked at the suggested previous questions about the dot without success. Does it mean and (as it does in propositional logic, where P.Q stands for P&Q?



The (or a) mysterious dot corps up again in Chapter 23, about e numbers, on the topic of the Taylor series. Here we find the series




*e^x=1+x+^2/1.2+x^3/1.2.3+...




What is the dot doing here, please? Is it in some way a concatenation? Or what is it?







calculus sequences-and-series limits notation






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 9 hours ago









anomaly

17.7k42666




17.7k42666










asked 9 hours ago









TuffyTuffy

1725




1725








  • 12




    $begingroup$
    Sometimes a dot is used for multiplication
    $endgroup$
    – J. W. Tanner
    9 hours ago








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Such a use of a dot when used for multiplication however usually occurs centered vertically as such: $acdot b$ typed as a cdot b as opposed to lower like a decimal point as such: $a.b$.
    $endgroup$
    – JMoravitz
    9 hours ago








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I'm not sure which is more common, but I've certainly seen a number of posts here on MSE that use a period dot to indicate multiplication. I've only ever used a centered dot myself, though.
    $endgroup$
    – Clayton
    9 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    If you just type acdot b without initiating mathmode, it doesn't do anything special of course... you need to initiate mathmode first using dollar signs like $acdot b$. See more about how to type with MathJax and $LaTeX$ here by visiting this tutorial
    $endgroup$
    – JMoravitz
    9 hours ago






  • 5




    $begingroup$
    In my (almost entirely English-language) experience the lowered dot for multiplication is used in British sources. Acheson is British.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Lugo
    8 hours ago














  • 12




    $begingroup$
    Sometimes a dot is used for multiplication
    $endgroup$
    – J. W. Tanner
    9 hours ago








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Such a use of a dot when used for multiplication however usually occurs centered vertically as such: $acdot b$ typed as a cdot b as opposed to lower like a decimal point as such: $a.b$.
    $endgroup$
    – JMoravitz
    9 hours ago








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I'm not sure which is more common, but I've certainly seen a number of posts here on MSE that use a period dot to indicate multiplication. I've only ever used a centered dot myself, though.
    $endgroup$
    – Clayton
    9 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    If you just type acdot b without initiating mathmode, it doesn't do anything special of course... you need to initiate mathmode first using dollar signs like $acdot b$. See more about how to type with MathJax and $LaTeX$ here by visiting this tutorial
    $endgroup$
    – JMoravitz
    9 hours ago






  • 5




    $begingroup$
    In my (almost entirely English-language) experience the lowered dot for multiplication is used in British sources. Acheson is British.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Lugo
    8 hours ago








12




12




$begingroup$
Sometimes a dot is used for multiplication
$endgroup$
– J. W. Tanner
9 hours ago






$begingroup$
Sometimes a dot is used for multiplication
$endgroup$
– J. W. Tanner
9 hours ago






3




3




$begingroup$
Such a use of a dot when used for multiplication however usually occurs centered vertically as such: $acdot b$ typed as a cdot b as opposed to lower like a decimal point as such: $a.b$.
$endgroup$
– JMoravitz
9 hours ago






$begingroup$
Such a use of a dot when used for multiplication however usually occurs centered vertically as such: $acdot b$ typed as a cdot b as opposed to lower like a decimal point as such: $a.b$.
$endgroup$
– JMoravitz
9 hours ago






1




1




$begingroup$
I'm not sure which is more common, but I've certainly seen a number of posts here on MSE that use a period dot to indicate multiplication. I've only ever used a centered dot myself, though.
$endgroup$
– Clayton
9 hours ago




$begingroup$
I'm not sure which is more common, but I've certainly seen a number of posts here on MSE that use a period dot to indicate multiplication. I've only ever used a centered dot myself, though.
$endgroup$
– Clayton
9 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
If you just type acdot b without initiating mathmode, it doesn't do anything special of course... you need to initiate mathmode first using dollar signs like $acdot b$. See more about how to type with MathJax and $LaTeX$ here by visiting this tutorial
$endgroup$
– JMoravitz
9 hours ago




$begingroup$
If you just type acdot b without initiating mathmode, it doesn't do anything special of course... you need to initiate mathmode first using dollar signs like $acdot b$. See more about how to type with MathJax and $LaTeX$ here by visiting this tutorial
$endgroup$
– JMoravitz
9 hours ago




5




5




$begingroup$
In my (almost entirely English-language) experience the lowered dot for multiplication is used in British sources. Acheson is British.
$endgroup$
– Michael Lugo
8 hours ago




$begingroup$
In my (almost entirely English-language) experience the lowered dot for multiplication is used in British sources. Acheson is British.
$endgroup$
– Michael Lugo
8 hours ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















12












$begingroup$

It is a quite common notation, if used, for multiplication, i.e.




$$5.3=5cdot3=5times3=15$$




In your case



$$dy/dx.dx/dt=frac{dy}{dy}timesfrac{dx}{dt}$$
and
$$e^x=1+x+frac{x^2}{1.2}+frac{x^3}{1.2.3}+cdots=1+x+frac{x^2}{1times2}+frac{x^3}{1times2times3}+cdots$$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I think that’s it, thank you. But does that mean in the second example that “x^3/1.2.3” means “x^3/1x2x3”?
    $endgroup$
    – Tuffy
    9 hours ago






  • 13




    $begingroup$
    Is the low dot actually really "commonly" used for multiplication? Where? I can understand $x.y$, and $5 cdot 3$ is obviously multiplication, but wouldn't $5.3$ get confused with the number $5 + 3/10$ really fast?!
    $endgroup$
    – ilkkachu
    5 hours ago








  • 5




    $begingroup$
    It is completely nuts for "5.3" to be the same as 5×3. 5.3 is 5 + 3/10, and you can't overload the same symbol to mean something totally different. (letting dx.dx be dx × dx is tolerable, because dx.dx does not already mean dx + dx/10).
    $endgroup$
    – Monty Harder
    5 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @ilkkachu Especially in the field of algebra, specifically in Linear Algebra and Abstract Algeba, I have encountered this notation quite often denoting multiplication, e.g. an inner product, in various ways. For myself, as German native speaker, I am used to $5color{red}{,}3$ as equivalent to $5+frac3{10}$ from where it cannot be mistaken with $5.3$. I have to admit that I have seen this notation rarely in connection with actual multplication of numbers.
    $endgroup$
    – mrtaurho
    5 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @ilkkachu In fact, I have solely encountered this notation in connection with either inner products of vectors spaces or as product of two groups. Take a look a this video:matterhorn.dce.harvard.edu/engage/player/… , right in the begin defining the group $G$ as product of two other groups, namely $G=mathbb R^2color{red}{.}O(2)$.
    $endgroup$
    – mrtaurho
    5 hours ago





















4












$begingroup$

Sometimes a dot is used for multiplication.
Cf. this Wikipedia article.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    0












    $begingroup$

    As @J.W.Tanner said though we usually write $a$ times $b$ as $$ab$$ or $$a times b$$ the urge of denoting it by $$a cdot b$$ is also common.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$









    • 1




      $begingroup$
      I'm not sure who "we" is in this answer. Among mathematicians, multiplication of numbers is almost universally denoted by $ab$ or $acdot b$. $times$ is used to denote other kinds of products, like the cross product of vectors.
      $endgroup$
      – Wojowu
      8 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @Wojowu: note that $times$ is "times" in MathJax
      $endgroup$
      – J. W. Tanner
      8 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @J.W.Tanner I know, I have used that in my comment.
      $endgroup$
      – Wojowu
      8 hours ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @Wojowu I think I'd be a little more precise: multiplication of numerical variables is almost always $ab$ or $acdot b$, with $times$ used for other kinds of products. But for multiplying literal numbers, a lot of people will write, e.g., $3times 5$ because $3cdot5$ looks a lot like $3.5$ (and, obviously, $35$ is thirty-five, not fifteen).
      $endgroup$
      – David Richerby
      6 hours ago






    • 3




      $begingroup$
      @DavidRicherby I admit I have meant numerical variables there; of course concatenation would be a terrible choice of a notation. I would still think that, for concrete numbers, $3cdot 5$ would be more common than $3times 5$ (though I admit I'm having hard time finding evidence for that - most math papers nowadays don't multiply numbers!)
      $endgroup$
      – Wojowu
      6 hours ago











    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3146597%2fwhat-is-the-dot-in-1-2-4%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    12












    $begingroup$

    It is a quite common notation, if used, for multiplication, i.e.




    $$5.3=5cdot3=5times3=15$$




    In your case



    $$dy/dx.dx/dt=frac{dy}{dy}timesfrac{dx}{dt}$$
    and
    $$e^x=1+x+frac{x^2}{1.2}+frac{x^3}{1.2.3}+cdots=1+x+frac{x^2}{1times2}+frac{x^3}{1times2times3}+cdots$$






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$









    • 1




      $begingroup$
      I think that’s it, thank you. But does that mean in the second example that “x^3/1.2.3” means “x^3/1x2x3”?
      $endgroup$
      – Tuffy
      9 hours ago






    • 13




      $begingroup$
      Is the low dot actually really "commonly" used for multiplication? Where? I can understand $x.y$, and $5 cdot 3$ is obviously multiplication, but wouldn't $5.3$ get confused with the number $5 + 3/10$ really fast?!
      $endgroup$
      – ilkkachu
      5 hours ago








    • 5




      $begingroup$
      It is completely nuts for "5.3" to be the same as 5×3. 5.3 is 5 + 3/10, and you can't overload the same symbol to mean something totally different. (letting dx.dx be dx × dx is tolerable, because dx.dx does not already mean dx + dx/10).
      $endgroup$
      – Monty Harder
      5 hours ago






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      @ilkkachu Especially in the field of algebra, specifically in Linear Algebra and Abstract Algeba, I have encountered this notation quite often denoting multiplication, e.g. an inner product, in various ways. For myself, as German native speaker, I am used to $5color{red}{,}3$ as equivalent to $5+frac3{10}$ from where it cannot be mistaken with $5.3$. I have to admit that I have seen this notation rarely in connection with actual multplication of numbers.
      $endgroup$
      – mrtaurho
      5 hours ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @ilkkachu In fact, I have solely encountered this notation in connection with either inner products of vectors spaces or as product of two groups. Take a look a this video:matterhorn.dce.harvard.edu/engage/player/… , right in the begin defining the group $G$ as product of two other groups, namely $G=mathbb R^2color{red}{.}O(2)$.
      $endgroup$
      – mrtaurho
      5 hours ago


















    12












    $begingroup$

    It is a quite common notation, if used, for multiplication, i.e.




    $$5.3=5cdot3=5times3=15$$




    In your case



    $$dy/dx.dx/dt=frac{dy}{dy}timesfrac{dx}{dt}$$
    and
    $$e^x=1+x+frac{x^2}{1.2}+frac{x^3}{1.2.3}+cdots=1+x+frac{x^2}{1times2}+frac{x^3}{1times2times3}+cdots$$






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$









    • 1




      $begingroup$
      I think that’s it, thank you. But does that mean in the second example that “x^3/1.2.3” means “x^3/1x2x3”?
      $endgroup$
      – Tuffy
      9 hours ago






    • 13




      $begingroup$
      Is the low dot actually really "commonly" used for multiplication? Where? I can understand $x.y$, and $5 cdot 3$ is obviously multiplication, but wouldn't $5.3$ get confused with the number $5 + 3/10$ really fast?!
      $endgroup$
      – ilkkachu
      5 hours ago








    • 5




      $begingroup$
      It is completely nuts for "5.3" to be the same as 5×3. 5.3 is 5 + 3/10, and you can't overload the same symbol to mean something totally different. (letting dx.dx be dx × dx is tolerable, because dx.dx does not already mean dx + dx/10).
      $endgroup$
      – Monty Harder
      5 hours ago






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      @ilkkachu Especially in the field of algebra, specifically in Linear Algebra and Abstract Algeba, I have encountered this notation quite often denoting multiplication, e.g. an inner product, in various ways. For myself, as German native speaker, I am used to $5color{red}{,}3$ as equivalent to $5+frac3{10}$ from where it cannot be mistaken with $5.3$. I have to admit that I have seen this notation rarely in connection with actual multplication of numbers.
      $endgroup$
      – mrtaurho
      5 hours ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @ilkkachu In fact, I have solely encountered this notation in connection with either inner products of vectors spaces or as product of two groups. Take a look a this video:matterhorn.dce.harvard.edu/engage/player/… , right in the begin defining the group $G$ as product of two other groups, namely $G=mathbb R^2color{red}{.}O(2)$.
      $endgroup$
      – mrtaurho
      5 hours ago
















    12












    12








    12





    $begingroup$

    It is a quite common notation, if used, for multiplication, i.e.




    $$5.3=5cdot3=5times3=15$$




    In your case



    $$dy/dx.dx/dt=frac{dy}{dy}timesfrac{dx}{dt}$$
    and
    $$e^x=1+x+frac{x^2}{1.2}+frac{x^3}{1.2.3}+cdots=1+x+frac{x^2}{1times2}+frac{x^3}{1times2times3}+cdots$$






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    It is a quite common notation, if used, for multiplication, i.e.




    $$5.3=5cdot3=5times3=15$$




    In your case



    $$dy/dx.dx/dt=frac{dy}{dy}timesfrac{dx}{dt}$$
    and
    $$e^x=1+x+frac{x^2}{1.2}+frac{x^3}{1.2.3}+cdots=1+x+frac{x^2}{1times2}+frac{x^3}{1times2times3}+cdots$$







    share|cite|improve this answer














    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer








    edited 5 hours ago

























    answered 9 hours ago









    mrtaurhomrtaurho

    5,93551641




    5,93551641








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      I think that’s it, thank you. But does that mean in the second example that “x^3/1.2.3” means “x^3/1x2x3”?
      $endgroup$
      – Tuffy
      9 hours ago






    • 13




      $begingroup$
      Is the low dot actually really "commonly" used for multiplication? Where? I can understand $x.y$, and $5 cdot 3$ is obviously multiplication, but wouldn't $5.3$ get confused with the number $5 + 3/10$ really fast?!
      $endgroup$
      – ilkkachu
      5 hours ago








    • 5




      $begingroup$
      It is completely nuts for "5.3" to be the same as 5×3. 5.3 is 5 + 3/10, and you can't overload the same symbol to mean something totally different. (letting dx.dx be dx × dx is tolerable, because dx.dx does not already mean dx + dx/10).
      $endgroup$
      – Monty Harder
      5 hours ago






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      @ilkkachu Especially in the field of algebra, specifically in Linear Algebra and Abstract Algeba, I have encountered this notation quite often denoting multiplication, e.g. an inner product, in various ways. For myself, as German native speaker, I am used to $5color{red}{,}3$ as equivalent to $5+frac3{10}$ from where it cannot be mistaken with $5.3$. I have to admit that I have seen this notation rarely in connection with actual multplication of numbers.
      $endgroup$
      – mrtaurho
      5 hours ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @ilkkachu In fact, I have solely encountered this notation in connection with either inner products of vectors spaces or as product of two groups. Take a look a this video:matterhorn.dce.harvard.edu/engage/player/… , right in the begin defining the group $G$ as product of two other groups, namely $G=mathbb R^2color{red}{.}O(2)$.
      $endgroup$
      – mrtaurho
      5 hours ago
















    • 1




      $begingroup$
      I think that’s it, thank you. But does that mean in the second example that “x^3/1.2.3” means “x^3/1x2x3”?
      $endgroup$
      – Tuffy
      9 hours ago






    • 13




      $begingroup$
      Is the low dot actually really "commonly" used for multiplication? Where? I can understand $x.y$, and $5 cdot 3$ is obviously multiplication, but wouldn't $5.3$ get confused with the number $5 + 3/10$ really fast?!
      $endgroup$
      – ilkkachu
      5 hours ago








    • 5




      $begingroup$
      It is completely nuts for "5.3" to be the same as 5×3. 5.3 is 5 + 3/10, and you can't overload the same symbol to mean something totally different. (letting dx.dx be dx × dx is tolerable, because dx.dx does not already mean dx + dx/10).
      $endgroup$
      – Monty Harder
      5 hours ago






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      @ilkkachu Especially in the field of algebra, specifically in Linear Algebra and Abstract Algeba, I have encountered this notation quite often denoting multiplication, e.g. an inner product, in various ways. For myself, as German native speaker, I am used to $5color{red}{,}3$ as equivalent to $5+frac3{10}$ from where it cannot be mistaken with $5.3$. I have to admit that I have seen this notation rarely in connection with actual multplication of numbers.
      $endgroup$
      – mrtaurho
      5 hours ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @ilkkachu In fact, I have solely encountered this notation in connection with either inner products of vectors spaces or as product of two groups. Take a look a this video:matterhorn.dce.harvard.edu/engage/player/… , right in the begin defining the group $G$ as product of two other groups, namely $G=mathbb R^2color{red}{.}O(2)$.
      $endgroup$
      – mrtaurho
      5 hours ago










    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    I think that’s it, thank you. But does that mean in the second example that “x^3/1.2.3” means “x^3/1x2x3”?
    $endgroup$
    – Tuffy
    9 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    I think that’s it, thank you. But does that mean in the second example that “x^3/1.2.3” means “x^3/1x2x3”?
    $endgroup$
    – Tuffy
    9 hours ago




    13




    13




    $begingroup$
    Is the low dot actually really "commonly" used for multiplication? Where? I can understand $x.y$, and $5 cdot 3$ is obviously multiplication, but wouldn't $5.3$ get confused with the number $5 + 3/10$ really fast?!
    $endgroup$
    – ilkkachu
    5 hours ago






    $begingroup$
    Is the low dot actually really "commonly" used for multiplication? Where? I can understand $x.y$, and $5 cdot 3$ is obviously multiplication, but wouldn't $5.3$ get confused with the number $5 + 3/10$ really fast?!
    $endgroup$
    – ilkkachu
    5 hours ago






    5




    5




    $begingroup$
    It is completely nuts for "5.3" to be the same as 5×3. 5.3 is 5 + 3/10, and you can't overload the same symbol to mean something totally different. (letting dx.dx be dx × dx is tolerable, because dx.dx does not already mean dx + dx/10).
    $endgroup$
    – Monty Harder
    5 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    It is completely nuts for "5.3" to be the same as 5×3. 5.3 is 5 + 3/10, and you can't overload the same symbol to mean something totally different. (letting dx.dx be dx × dx is tolerable, because dx.dx does not already mean dx + dx/10).
    $endgroup$
    – Monty Harder
    5 hours ago




    2




    2




    $begingroup$
    @ilkkachu Especially in the field of algebra, specifically in Linear Algebra and Abstract Algeba, I have encountered this notation quite often denoting multiplication, e.g. an inner product, in various ways. For myself, as German native speaker, I am used to $5color{red}{,}3$ as equivalent to $5+frac3{10}$ from where it cannot be mistaken with $5.3$. I have to admit that I have seen this notation rarely in connection with actual multplication of numbers.
    $endgroup$
    – mrtaurho
    5 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    @ilkkachu Especially in the field of algebra, specifically in Linear Algebra and Abstract Algeba, I have encountered this notation quite often denoting multiplication, e.g. an inner product, in various ways. For myself, as German native speaker, I am used to $5color{red}{,}3$ as equivalent to $5+frac3{10}$ from where it cannot be mistaken with $5.3$. I have to admit that I have seen this notation rarely in connection with actual multplication of numbers.
    $endgroup$
    – mrtaurho
    5 hours ago




    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    @ilkkachu In fact, I have solely encountered this notation in connection with either inner products of vectors spaces or as product of two groups. Take a look a this video:matterhorn.dce.harvard.edu/engage/player/… , right in the begin defining the group $G$ as product of two other groups, namely $G=mathbb R^2color{red}{.}O(2)$.
    $endgroup$
    – mrtaurho
    5 hours ago






    $begingroup$
    @ilkkachu In fact, I have solely encountered this notation in connection with either inner products of vectors spaces or as product of two groups. Take a look a this video:matterhorn.dce.harvard.edu/engage/player/… , right in the begin defining the group $G$ as product of two other groups, namely $G=mathbb R^2color{red}{.}O(2)$.
    $endgroup$
    – mrtaurho
    5 hours ago













    4












    $begingroup$

    Sometimes a dot is used for multiplication.
    Cf. this Wikipedia article.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      4












      $begingroup$

      Sometimes a dot is used for multiplication.
      Cf. this Wikipedia article.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        4












        4








        4





        $begingroup$

        Sometimes a dot is used for multiplication.
        Cf. this Wikipedia article.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        Sometimes a dot is used for multiplication.
        Cf. this Wikipedia article.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered 9 hours ago









        J. W. TannerJ. W. Tanner

        3,2001320




        3,2001320























            0












            $begingroup$

            As @J.W.Tanner said though we usually write $a$ times $b$ as $$ab$$ or $$a times b$$ the urge of denoting it by $$a cdot b$$ is also common.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$









            • 1




              $begingroup$
              I'm not sure who "we" is in this answer. Among mathematicians, multiplication of numbers is almost universally denoted by $ab$ or $acdot b$. $times$ is used to denote other kinds of products, like the cross product of vectors.
              $endgroup$
              – Wojowu
              8 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              @Wojowu: note that $times$ is "times" in MathJax
              $endgroup$
              – J. W. Tanner
              8 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              @J.W.Tanner I know, I have used that in my comment.
              $endgroup$
              – Wojowu
              8 hours ago






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              @Wojowu I think I'd be a little more precise: multiplication of numerical variables is almost always $ab$ or $acdot b$, with $times$ used for other kinds of products. But for multiplying literal numbers, a lot of people will write, e.g., $3times 5$ because $3cdot5$ looks a lot like $3.5$ (and, obviously, $35$ is thirty-five, not fifteen).
              $endgroup$
              – David Richerby
              6 hours ago






            • 3




              $begingroup$
              @DavidRicherby I admit I have meant numerical variables there; of course concatenation would be a terrible choice of a notation. I would still think that, for concrete numbers, $3cdot 5$ would be more common than $3times 5$ (though I admit I'm having hard time finding evidence for that - most math papers nowadays don't multiply numbers!)
              $endgroup$
              – Wojowu
              6 hours ago
















            0












            $begingroup$

            As @J.W.Tanner said though we usually write $a$ times $b$ as $$ab$$ or $$a times b$$ the urge of denoting it by $$a cdot b$$ is also common.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$









            • 1




              $begingroup$
              I'm not sure who "we" is in this answer. Among mathematicians, multiplication of numbers is almost universally denoted by $ab$ or $acdot b$. $times$ is used to denote other kinds of products, like the cross product of vectors.
              $endgroup$
              – Wojowu
              8 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              @Wojowu: note that $times$ is "times" in MathJax
              $endgroup$
              – J. W. Tanner
              8 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              @J.W.Tanner I know, I have used that in my comment.
              $endgroup$
              – Wojowu
              8 hours ago






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              @Wojowu I think I'd be a little more precise: multiplication of numerical variables is almost always $ab$ or $acdot b$, with $times$ used for other kinds of products. But for multiplying literal numbers, a lot of people will write, e.g., $3times 5$ because $3cdot5$ looks a lot like $3.5$ (and, obviously, $35$ is thirty-five, not fifteen).
              $endgroup$
              – David Richerby
              6 hours ago






            • 3




              $begingroup$
              @DavidRicherby I admit I have meant numerical variables there; of course concatenation would be a terrible choice of a notation. I would still think that, for concrete numbers, $3cdot 5$ would be more common than $3times 5$ (though I admit I'm having hard time finding evidence for that - most math papers nowadays don't multiply numbers!)
              $endgroup$
              – Wojowu
              6 hours ago














            0












            0








            0





            $begingroup$

            As @J.W.Tanner said though we usually write $a$ times $b$ as $$ab$$ or $$a times b$$ the urge of denoting it by $$a cdot b$$ is also common.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            As @J.W.Tanner said though we usually write $a$ times $b$ as $$ab$$ or $$a times b$$ the urge of denoting it by $$a cdot b$$ is also common.







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered 9 hours ago









            MATHS MODMATHS MOD

            1709




            1709








            • 1




              $begingroup$
              I'm not sure who "we" is in this answer. Among mathematicians, multiplication of numbers is almost universally denoted by $ab$ or $acdot b$. $times$ is used to denote other kinds of products, like the cross product of vectors.
              $endgroup$
              – Wojowu
              8 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              @Wojowu: note that $times$ is "times" in MathJax
              $endgroup$
              – J. W. Tanner
              8 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              @J.W.Tanner I know, I have used that in my comment.
              $endgroup$
              – Wojowu
              8 hours ago






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              @Wojowu I think I'd be a little more precise: multiplication of numerical variables is almost always $ab$ or $acdot b$, with $times$ used for other kinds of products. But for multiplying literal numbers, a lot of people will write, e.g., $3times 5$ because $3cdot5$ looks a lot like $3.5$ (and, obviously, $35$ is thirty-five, not fifteen).
              $endgroup$
              – David Richerby
              6 hours ago






            • 3




              $begingroup$
              @DavidRicherby I admit I have meant numerical variables there; of course concatenation would be a terrible choice of a notation. I would still think that, for concrete numbers, $3cdot 5$ would be more common than $3times 5$ (though I admit I'm having hard time finding evidence for that - most math papers nowadays don't multiply numbers!)
              $endgroup$
              – Wojowu
              6 hours ago














            • 1




              $begingroup$
              I'm not sure who "we" is in this answer. Among mathematicians, multiplication of numbers is almost universally denoted by $ab$ or $acdot b$. $times$ is used to denote other kinds of products, like the cross product of vectors.
              $endgroup$
              – Wojowu
              8 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              @Wojowu: note that $times$ is "times" in MathJax
              $endgroup$
              – J. W. Tanner
              8 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              @J.W.Tanner I know, I have used that in my comment.
              $endgroup$
              – Wojowu
              8 hours ago






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              @Wojowu I think I'd be a little more precise: multiplication of numerical variables is almost always $ab$ or $acdot b$, with $times$ used for other kinds of products. But for multiplying literal numbers, a lot of people will write, e.g., $3times 5$ because $3cdot5$ looks a lot like $3.5$ (and, obviously, $35$ is thirty-five, not fifteen).
              $endgroup$
              – David Richerby
              6 hours ago






            • 3




              $begingroup$
              @DavidRicherby I admit I have meant numerical variables there; of course concatenation would be a terrible choice of a notation. I would still think that, for concrete numbers, $3cdot 5$ would be more common than $3times 5$ (though I admit I'm having hard time finding evidence for that - most math papers nowadays don't multiply numbers!)
              $endgroup$
              – Wojowu
              6 hours ago








            1




            1




            $begingroup$
            I'm not sure who "we" is in this answer. Among mathematicians, multiplication of numbers is almost universally denoted by $ab$ or $acdot b$. $times$ is used to denote other kinds of products, like the cross product of vectors.
            $endgroup$
            – Wojowu
            8 hours ago




            $begingroup$
            I'm not sure who "we" is in this answer. Among mathematicians, multiplication of numbers is almost universally denoted by $ab$ or $acdot b$. $times$ is used to denote other kinds of products, like the cross product of vectors.
            $endgroup$
            – Wojowu
            8 hours ago












            $begingroup$
            @Wojowu: note that $times$ is "times" in MathJax
            $endgroup$
            – J. W. Tanner
            8 hours ago




            $begingroup$
            @Wojowu: note that $times$ is "times" in MathJax
            $endgroup$
            – J. W. Tanner
            8 hours ago












            $begingroup$
            @J.W.Tanner I know, I have used that in my comment.
            $endgroup$
            – Wojowu
            8 hours ago




            $begingroup$
            @J.W.Tanner I know, I have used that in my comment.
            $endgroup$
            – Wojowu
            8 hours ago




            1




            1




            $begingroup$
            @Wojowu I think I'd be a little more precise: multiplication of numerical variables is almost always $ab$ or $acdot b$, with $times$ used for other kinds of products. But for multiplying literal numbers, a lot of people will write, e.g., $3times 5$ because $3cdot5$ looks a lot like $3.5$ (and, obviously, $35$ is thirty-five, not fifteen).
            $endgroup$
            – David Richerby
            6 hours ago




            $begingroup$
            @Wojowu I think I'd be a little more precise: multiplication of numerical variables is almost always $ab$ or $acdot b$, with $times$ used for other kinds of products. But for multiplying literal numbers, a lot of people will write, e.g., $3times 5$ because $3cdot5$ looks a lot like $3.5$ (and, obviously, $35$ is thirty-five, not fifteen).
            $endgroup$
            – David Richerby
            6 hours ago




            3




            3




            $begingroup$
            @DavidRicherby I admit I have meant numerical variables there; of course concatenation would be a terrible choice of a notation. I would still think that, for concrete numbers, $3cdot 5$ would be more common than $3times 5$ (though I admit I'm having hard time finding evidence for that - most math papers nowadays don't multiply numbers!)
            $endgroup$
            – Wojowu
            6 hours ago




            $begingroup$
            @DavidRicherby I admit I have meant numerical variables there; of course concatenation would be a terrible choice of a notation. I would still think that, for concrete numbers, $3cdot 5$ would be more common than $3times 5$ (though I admit I'm having hard time finding evidence for that - most math papers nowadays don't multiply numbers!)
            $endgroup$
            – Wojowu
            6 hours ago


















            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3146597%2fwhat-is-the-dot-in-1-2-4%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Category:香港粉麵

            List *all* the tuples!

            Channel [V]