Accidental expletives in mathematical literature. [on hold]











up vote
54
down vote

favorite
19












It's a bit of a silly one, yeah, but this question has so far been unanswered in any readily accessible place online (as far as I can tell).




Are there any instances of expletives (in any language) that have occurred (preferably by mistake) in serious, mathematical literature?




I don't know of any examples.



The sort of thing I am looking for:



Suppose a paper is published studying a phenomenon innocently with the variables $c, f, k, u$ and there just so happens to be the expression



$$f^uck$$



somewhere in a derivation of some identity or what have you.





NB: I believe that this question is within SE standards since it is talking about the words themselves, although it is a bit risqué!










share|cite|improve this question















put on hold as off-topic by Clement C., Brahadeesh, Parcly Taxel, user21820, amWhy yesterday


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is not about mathematics, within the scope defined in the help center." – Clement C., Brahadeesh, Parcly Taxel, user21820, amWhy

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.









  • 10




    such an expression can arise if $f$ is uniformly continuous on a compact set $K$
    – mathworker21
    Nov 16 at 1:10






  • 18




    I've seen a photo of a "$p in mathbb{N}$ is" on a blackboard. Not having the context, I don't know whether it was a proper accident...
    – darij grinberg
    Nov 16 at 1:17






  • 11




    Said cross-cap. Freud would be proud.
    – AccidentalFourierTransform
    Nov 16 at 3:41






  • 9




    There is always the Cox-Zucker Machine. However, I have heard that this was not entirely accidental...
    – Jair Taylor
    Nov 16 at 4:47








  • 13




    Many math publications contain the substring anal, though not as a complete word. A colleague of mine becomes very anxious when we're sitting at his desk and he has to google something containing "analysis". He types "ysis" fast enough so that the history doesn't appear.
    – Eric Duminil
    2 days ago

















up vote
54
down vote

favorite
19












It's a bit of a silly one, yeah, but this question has so far been unanswered in any readily accessible place online (as far as I can tell).




Are there any instances of expletives (in any language) that have occurred (preferably by mistake) in serious, mathematical literature?




I don't know of any examples.



The sort of thing I am looking for:



Suppose a paper is published studying a phenomenon innocently with the variables $c, f, k, u$ and there just so happens to be the expression



$$f^uck$$



somewhere in a derivation of some identity or what have you.





NB: I believe that this question is within SE standards since it is talking about the words themselves, although it is a bit risqué!










share|cite|improve this question















put on hold as off-topic by Clement C., Brahadeesh, Parcly Taxel, user21820, amWhy yesterday


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is not about mathematics, within the scope defined in the help center." – Clement C., Brahadeesh, Parcly Taxel, user21820, amWhy

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.









  • 10




    such an expression can arise if $f$ is uniformly continuous on a compact set $K$
    – mathworker21
    Nov 16 at 1:10






  • 18




    I've seen a photo of a "$p in mathbb{N}$ is" on a blackboard. Not having the context, I don't know whether it was a proper accident...
    – darij grinberg
    Nov 16 at 1:17






  • 11




    Said cross-cap. Freud would be proud.
    – AccidentalFourierTransform
    Nov 16 at 3:41






  • 9




    There is always the Cox-Zucker Machine. However, I have heard that this was not entirely accidental...
    – Jair Taylor
    Nov 16 at 4:47








  • 13




    Many math publications contain the substring anal, though not as a complete word. A colleague of mine becomes very anxious when we're sitting at his desk and he has to google something containing "analysis". He types "ysis" fast enough so that the history doesn't appear.
    – Eric Duminil
    2 days ago















up vote
54
down vote

favorite
19









up vote
54
down vote

favorite
19






19





It's a bit of a silly one, yeah, but this question has so far been unanswered in any readily accessible place online (as far as I can tell).




Are there any instances of expletives (in any language) that have occurred (preferably by mistake) in serious, mathematical literature?




I don't know of any examples.



The sort of thing I am looking for:



Suppose a paper is published studying a phenomenon innocently with the variables $c, f, k, u$ and there just so happens to be the expression



$$f^uck$$



somewhere in a derivation of some identity or what have you.





NB: I believe that this question is within SE standards since it is talking about the words themselves, although it is a bit risqué!










share|cite|improve this question















It's a bit of a silly one, yeah, but this question has so far been unanswered in any readily accessible place online (as far as I can tell).




Are there any instances of expletives (in any language) that have occurred (preferably by mistake) in serious, mathematical literature?




I don't know of any examples.



The sort of thing I am looking for:



Suppose a paper is published studying a phenomenon innocently with the variables $c, f, k, u$ and there just so happens to be the expression



$$f^uck$$



somewhere in a derivation of some identity or what have you.





NB: I believe that this question is within SE standards since it is talking about the words themselves, although it is a bit risqué!







reference-request book-recommendation math-history big-list translation-request






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 2 days ago


























community wiki





Shaun





put on hold as off-topic by Clement C., Brahadeesh, Parcly Taxel, user21820, amWhy yesterday


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is not about mathematics, within the scope defined in the help center." – Clement C., Brahadeesh, Parcly Taxel, user21820, amWhy

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.




put on hold as off-topic by Clement C., Brahadeesh, Parcly Taxel, user21820, amWhy yesterday


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is not about mathematics, within the scope defined in the help center." – Clement C., Brahadeesh, Parcly Taxel, user21820, amWhy

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.








  • 10




    such an expression can arise if $f$ is uniformly continuous on a compact set $K$
    – mathworker21
    Nov 16 at 1:10






  • 18




    I've seen a photo of a "$p in mathbb{N}$ is" on a blackboard. Not having the context, I don't know whether it was a proper accident...
    – darij grinberg
    Nov 16 at 1:17






  • 11




    Said cross-cap. Freud would be proud.
    – AccidentalFourierTransform
    Nov 16 at 3:41






  • 9




    There is always the Cox-Zucker Machine. However, I have heard that this was not entirely accidental...
    – Jair Taylor
    Nov 16 at 4:47








  • 13




    Many math publications contain the substring anal, though not as a complete word. A colleague of mine becomes very anxious when we're sitting at his desk and he has to google something containing "analysis". He types "ysis" fast enough so that the history doesn't appear.
    – Eric Duminil
    2 days ago
















  • 10




    such an expression can arise if $f$ is uniformly continuous on a compact set $K$
    – mathworker21
    Nov 16 at 1:10






  • 18




    I've seen a photo of a "$p in mathbb{N}$ is" on a blackboard. Not having the context, I don't know whether it was a proper accident...
    – darij grinberg
    Nov 16 at 1:17






  • 11




    Said cross-cap. Freud would be proud.
    – AccidentalFourierTransform
    Nov 16 at 3:41






  • 9




    There is always the Cox-Zucker Machine. However, I have heard that this was not entirely accidental...
    – Jair Taylor
    Nov 16 at 4:47








  • 13




    Many math publications contain the substring anal, though not as a complete word. A colleague of mine becomes very anxious when we're sitting at his desk and he has to google something containing "analysis". He types "ysis" fast enough so that the history doesn't appear.
    – Eric Duminil
    2 days ago










10




10




such an expression can arise if $f$ is uniformly continuous on a compact set $K$
– mathworker21
Nov 16 at 1:10




such an expression can arise if $f$ is uniformly continuous on a compact set $K$
– mathworker21
Nov 16 at 1:10




18




18




I've seen a photo of a "$p in mathbb{N}$ is" on a blackboard. Not having the context, I don't know whether it was a proper accident...
– darij grinberg
Nov 16 at 1:17




I've seen a photo of a "$p in mathbb{N}$ is" on a blackboard. Not having the context, I don't know whether it was a proper accident...
– darij grinberg
Nov 16 at 1:17




11




11




Said cross-cap. Freud would be proud.
– AccidentalFourierTransform
Nov 16 at 3:41




Said cross-cap. Freud would be proud.
– AccidentalFourierTransform
Nov 16 at 3:41




9




9




There is always the Cox-Zucker Machine. However, I have heard that this was not entirely accidental...
– Jair Taylor
Nov 16 at 4:47






There is always the Cox-Zucker Machine. However, I have heard that this was not entirely accidental...
– Jair Taylor
Nov 16 at 4:47






13




13




Many math publications contain the substring anal, though not as a complete word. A colleague of mine becomes very anxious when we're sitting at his desk and he has to google something containing "analysis". He types "ysis" fast enough so that the history doesn't appear.
– Eric Duminil
2 days ago






Many math publications contain the substring anal, though not as a complete word. A colleague of mine becomes very anxious when we're sitting at his desk and he has to google something containing "analysis". He types "ysis" fast enough so that the history doesn't appear.
– Eric Duminil
2 days ago












14 Answers
14






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
57
down vote













I have no way of knowing if it was accidental or intentional, but the expression




$$C(u,n,t_1,dots,t_k)$$




occurs on p. 95 of Paul J. Cohen, Set Theory and the Continuum Hypothesis, W. A. Benjamin, Inc., New York, 1966, in section III.4, "Proof of AC and GCH in L".






share|cite|improve this answer



















  • 7




    A Google search reveals at least a couple of published papers in which “Continuum Hypothesis” was spelled with one too many u’s and one too few o’s. (The examples I found were only misspellings of article titles in bibliographies.)
    – Steve Kass
    Nov 16 at 3:58


















up vote
43
down vote













This wasn't published, but I'll post it anyway. I apologize for not using MathJax below, but the plain text representation more accurately represents the handwriting, which is relevant to the story.



In my freshman linear algebra class, the professor illustrated the calculation of the determinant a generic $3 times 3$ matrix
$$left( begin{array}{ccc} a & b & c \ d & e & f \ g & h & i end{array} right)$$
via the Laplace expansion by minors down the first column. One term (not including the leading minus sign) is



"d (bi-ch)".



Some wise guy asked "Does this also work for calculating the permanent?", correctly predicting what was about to happen. The professor cheerfully responded "Yep, you just change all the minuses to plusses!" and changed it to



"d (bi+ch)".



When everyone laughed, he looked horrified and erased it right away.






share|cite|improve this answer



















  • 11




    Wow, your freshman linear algebra class covered permanents?
    – bof
    Nov 16 at 5:09






  • 16




    @bof I mean, I think the professor covered it at the level of "There's also something called the permanent, which is like the determinant but with all plus signs, and which is much less common than the determinant but still sometimes useful."
    – tparker
    Nov 16 at 5:12






  • 13




    On the topic, the wikipedia article on the permanent features the delightful sentence "multiplying any single row or column of $A$ by a scalar $s$ changes $perm(A)$ to $s cdot perm(A)$"
    – ekkilop
    2 days ago




















up vote
20
down vote













The set of associated primes of an $R$-module $M$ is denoted by
$$mathrm{Ass}_R(M) $$
This is universal notation. Look in any textbook on commutative algebra.






share|cite|improve this answer






























    up vote
    18
    down vote













    My Linear Algebra lecturer kept on talking about $s in X$ and $v_j$. The latter is more of a stretch, but I imagine both occur very frequently in the literature.






    share|cite|improve this answer



















    • 9




      As does inevitably $b_j$ when you're already using $a_i$...
      – Robert Wolfe
      2 days ago


















    up vote
    17
    down vote













    Perhaps a bit obscure, but perfectly serious:



    The Cox-Zucker machine is an algorithm that determines if a set of sections provides a basis for the Mordell–Weil group of an elliptic surface $E → S$ where $S$ is isomorphic to the projective line.






    share|cite|improve this answer



















    • 4




      The Talk page on Wikipedia has an (unsigned) claim that Dr. Cox specifically chose Dr. Zucker as a collaborator in order to produce the salacious-sounding name.
      – Ross Presser
      2 days ago










    • Calling it a "machine" also seems deliberate - wouldn't "algorithm" be more usual?
      – Michael Lugo
      2 days ago










    • @MichaelLugo There's a precedent for calling algorithms "machines", depending on how generic they are. See e.g. a Turing machine, which is just an algorithm with more vague variables than math normally has. I don't have enough of a math background to evaluate the Cox-Zucker machine to see if that's the case there.
      – Nic Hartley
      2 days ago


















    up vote
    15
    down vote













    Crossing to a different science (so slightly off topic!). But Proton Enhanced Nuclear Induction Spectroscopy is a genuine NMR spectroscopy technique (and it's in a field where everything is known by acronyms so yeah it was deliberate...) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proton-enhanced_nuclear_induction_spectroscopy



    Sadly it's usually known as Cross Polarisation (CP) nowadays.






    share|cite|improve this answer























    • I like this, especially since the linked Wikipedia page uses the original acronym :)
      – Will Appleby
      2 days ago






    • 5




      I never expected to read this setence in Wikipedia: "The PENIS technique was patented in 1972."
      – Ral Zarek
      2 days ago


















    up vote
    6
    down vote













    My Linear Algebra professor once referenced a matrix with $A_{RS}$. When the students laughed, he told us about a pamphlet from the end of the Thirty Years' War titled "Mars is in the Ars".






    share|cite|improve this answer



















    • 1




      See also: the RSA cryptosystem, notably with its inventors' initials not in alphabetical order. (Although, it's more likely that Adleman thought he didn't contribute to it as much as Rivest and Shamir did.)
      – Akiva Weinberger
      yesterday




















    up vote
    4
    down vote













    I remember well that we had a book from a Professor Fick during my physics studies, and used to refer to it as the 'Fick-Book', often in public; to the consternation and shock of other people around us (in the tram, or in cafes)



    [Fick is the german work for 'fuck']
    https://de.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eugen_Fick






    share|cite|improve this answer






























      up vote
      2
      down vote













      One well-known example, that arose when branes were introduced into String Theory (physics), was that people studying $p$-dimensional branes were branded “$p$-brane theorists”. (Like some examples above, that is perhaps more a homonym of an explicative.)






      share|cite|improve this answer






























        up vote
        2
        down vote













        It's more engineering than mathematics, but there is a well-known supplier of electronic test equipment called Wayne Kerr. You have to believe that the company name was chosen innocently by someone naive who hadn't talked to their shop-floor workers.






        share|cite|improve this answer






























          up vote
          2
          down vote













          The 1996 University of Cambridge Mathematical Tripos IB (second year undergraduate exam), Paper 1, had question 5D on Linear Mathematics ending with the sentence:




          Define the dual map $alpha^*$ and prove that $alpha^* f_r^* = sum_{s=1}^n a_{rs}e_s^*$, $1 le r le m$.







          share|cite|improve this answer



















          • 1




            Can you explain what this is hinting at? I don't see it at all.
            – Git Gud
            yesterday










          • @GitGud $a_{rs}e$ -> arse.
            – User
            yesterday












          • Indeed $a_{rs}e_s$ gives the plural "arses"!
            – Ben C
            yesterday


















          up vote
          1
          down vote













          There is a certain Dr. Bagger who is active in Theoretical Physics (quite mathematical, at least to us experimentalists). He often works in collaboration with others and since his name is quite near the beginning of the alphabet, his citations lead to a witty coincidence (probably funnier for British people...).



          A typical reference to Dr. Bagger's work



          From page 181 of https://arxiv.org/pdf/hep-ph/0203079.pdf






          share|cite|improve this answer



















          • 1




            The Question asks about mathematical literature, which possibly could be broadly interpreted to include theoretical physics papers. However without a link or proper citation, it's hard to gauge how relevant your proposed example is. Perhaps a citation of the paper (in other literature) would serve this purpose.
            – hardmath
            2 days ago


















          up vote
          1
          down vote













          I'm currently reading this paper https://arxiv.org/abs/1207.4750 (which, admittedly is physics not math) on page 5 they are describing a general procedure so they just give an example of an action which they denote as



          $$S_{ex}$$



          S because that is the traditional way of denoting an action, and ex because it's just a generic example that they trying to use






          share|cite|improve this answer






























            up vote
            0
            down vote













            This happend digital electronic class. Teacher was explaining some circuit that she drawn on blackboard. Output was Q0 to Q7, every time she say Q2 we were chuckling. It took her some time to realize that Q2 (pronounced kudwa) is very similar to word kurwa (fuck or bitch, depend on context).






            share|cite|improve this answer























            • This is in Poland?
              – Akiva Weinberger
              yesterday


















            14 Answers
            14






            active

            oldest

            votes








            14 Answers
            14






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            57
            down vote













            I have no way of knowing if it was accidental or intentional, but the expression




            $$C(u,n,t_1,dots,t_k)$$




            occurs on p. 95 of Paul J. Cohen, Set Theory and the Continuum Hypothesis, W. A. Benjamin, Inc., New York, 1966, in section III.4, "Proof of AC and GCH in L".






            share|cite|improve this answer



















            • 7




              A Google search reveals at least a couple of published papers in which “Continuum Hypothesis” was spelled with one too many u’s and one too few o’s. (The examples I found were only misspellings of article titles in bibliographies.)
              – Steve Kass
              Nov 16 at 3:58















            up vote
            57
            down vote













            I have no way of knowing if it was accidental or intentional, but the expression




            $$C(u,n,t_1,dots,t_k)$$




            occurs on p. 95 of Paul J. Cohen, Set Theory and the Continuum Hypothesis, W. A. Benjamin, Inc., New York, 1966, in section III.4, "Proof of AC and GCH in L".






            share|cite|improve this answer



















            • 7




              A Google search reveals at least a couple of published papers in which “Continuum Hypothesis” was spelled with one too many u’s and one too few o’s. (The examples I found were only misspellings of article titles in bibliographies.)
              – Steve Kass
              Nov 16 at 3:58













            up vote
            57
            down vote










            up vote
            57
            down vote









            I have no way of knowing if it was accidental or intentional, but the expression




            $$C(u,n,t_1,dots,t_k)$$




            occurs on p. 95 of Paul J. Cohen, Set Theory and the Continuum Hypothesis, W. A. Benjamin, Inc., New York, 1966, in section III.4, "Proof of AC and GCH in L".






            share|cite|improve this answer














            I have no way of knowing if it was accidental or intentional, but the expression




            $$C(u,n,t_1,dots,t_k)$$




            occurs on p. 95 of Paul J. Cohen, Set Theory and the Continuum Hypothesis, W. A. Benjamin, Inc., New York, 1966, in section III.4, "Proof of AC and GCH in L".







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited Nov 16 at 2:44


























            community wiki





            bof









            • 7




              A Google search reveals at least a couple of published papers in which “Continuum Hypothesis” was spelled with one too many u’s and one too few o’s. (The examples I found were only misspellings of article titles in bibliographies.)
              – Steve Kass
              Nov 16 at 3:58














            • 7




              A Google search reveals at least a couple of published papers in which “Continuum Hypothesis” was spelled with one too many u’s and one too few o’s. (The examples I found were only misspellings of article titles in bibliographies.)
              – Steve Kass
              Nov 16 at 3:58








            7




            7




            A Google search reveals at least a couple of published papers in which “Continuum Hypothesis” was spelled with one too many u’s and one too few o’s. (The examples I found were only misspellings of article titles in bibliographies.)
            – Steve Kass
            Nov 16 at 3:58




            A Google search reveals at least a couple of published papers in which “Continuum Hypothesis” was spelled with one too many u’s and one too few o’s. (The examples I found were only misspellings of article titles in bibliographies.)
            – Steve Kass
            Nov 16 at 3:58










            up vote
            43
            down vote













            This wasn't published, but I'll post it anyway. I apologize for not using MathJax below, but the plain text representation more accurately represents the handwriting, which is relevant to the story.



            In my freshman linear algebra class, the professor illustrated the calculation of the determinant a generic $3 times 3$ matrix
            $$left( begin{array}{ccc} a & b & c \ d & e & f \ g & h & i end{array} right)$$
            via the Laplace expansion by minors down the first column. One term (not including the leading minus sign) is



            "d (bi-ch)".



            Some wise guy asked "Does this also work for calculating the permanent?", correctly predicting what was about to happen. The professor cheerfully responded "Yep, you just change all the minuses to plusses!" and changed it to



            "d (bi+ch)".



            When everyone laughed, he looked horrified and erased it right away.






            share|cite|improve this answer



















            • 11




              Wow, your freshman linear algebra class covered permanents?
              – bof
              Nov 16 at 5:09






            • 16




              @bof I mean, I think the professor covered it at the level of "There's also something called the permanent, which is like the determinant but with all plus signs, and which is much less common than the determinant but still sometimes useful."
              – tparker
              Nov 16 at 5:12






            • 13




              On the topic, the wikipedia article on the permanent features the delightful sentence "multiplying any single row or column of $A$ by a scalar $s$ changes $perm(A)$ to $s cdot perm(A)$"
              – ekkilop
              2 days ago

















            up vote
            43
            down vote













            This wasn't published, but I'll post it anyway. I apologize for not using MathJax below, but the plain text representation more accurately represents the handwriting, which is relevant to the story.



            In my freshman linear algebra class, the professor illustrated the calculation of the determinant a generic $3 times 3$ matrix
            $$left( begin{array}{ccc} a & b & c \ d & e & f \ g & h & i end{array} right)$$
            via the Laplace expansion by minors down the first column. One term (not including the leading minus sign) is



            "d (bi-ch)".



            Some wise guy asked "Does this also work for calculating the permanent?", correctly predicting what was about to happen. The professor cheerfully responded "Yep, you just change all the minuses to plusses!" and changed it to



            "d (bi+ch)".



            When everyone laughed, he looked horrified and erased it right away.






            share|cite|improve this answer



















            • 11




              Wow, your freshman linear algebra class covered permanents?
              – bof
              Nov 16 at 5:09






            • 16




              @bof I mean, I think the professor covered it at the level of "There's also something called the permanent, which is like the determinant but with all plus signs, and which is much less common than the determinant but still sometimes useful."
              – tparker
              Nov 16 at 5:12






            • 13




              On the topic, the wikipedia article on the permanent features the delightful sentence "multiplying any single row or column of $A$ by a scalar $s$ changes $perm(A)$ to $s cdot perm(A)$"
              – ekkilop
              2 days ago















            up vote
            43
            down vote










            up vote
            43
            down vote









            This wasn't published, but I'll post it anyway. I apologize for not using MathJax below, but the plain text representation more accurately represents the handwriting, which is relevant to the story.



            In my freshman linear algebra class, the professor illustrated the calculation of the determinant a generic $3 times 3$ matrix
            $$left( begin{array}{ccc} a & b & c \ d & e & f \ g & h & i end{array} right)$$
            via the Laplace expansion by minors down the first column. One term (not including the leading minus sign) is



            "d (bi-ch)".



            Some wise guy asked "Does this also work for calculating the permanent?", correctly predicting what was about to happen. The professor cheerfully responded "Yep, you just change all the minuses to plusses!" and changed it to



            "d (bi+ch)".



            When everyone laughed, he looked horrified and erased it right away.






            share|cite|improve this answer














            This wasn't published, but I'll post it anyway. I apologize for not using MathJax below, but the plain text representation more accurately represents the handwriting, which is relevant to the story.



            In my freshman linear algebra class, the professor illustrated the calculation of the determinant a generic $3 times 3$ matrix
            $$left( begin{array}{ccc} a & b & c \ d & e & f \ g & h & i end{array} right)$$
            via the Laplace expansion by minors down the first column. One term (not including the leading minus sign) is



            "d (bi-ch)".



            Some wise guy asked "Does this also work for calculating the permanent?", correctly predicting what was about to happen. The professor cheerfully responded "Yep, you just change all the minuses to plusses!" and changed it to



            "d (bi+ch)".



            When everyone laughed, he looked horrified and erased it right away.







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            answered Nov 16 at 4:51


























            community wiki





            tparker









            • 11




              Wow, your freshman linear algebra class covered permanents?
              – bof
              Nov 16 at 5:09






            • 16




              @bof I mean, I think the professor covered it at the level of "There's also something called the permanent, which is like the determinant but with all plus signs, and which is much less common than the determinant but still sometimes useful."
              – tparker
              Nov 16 at 5:12






            • 13




              On the topic, the wikipedia article on the permanent features the delightful sentence "multiplying any single row or column of $A$ by a scalar $s$ changes $perm(A)$ to $s cdot perm(A)$"
              – ekkilop
              2 days ago
















            • 11




              Wow, your freshman linear algebra class covered permanents?
              – bof
              Nov 16 at 5:09






            • 16




              @bof I mean, I think the professor covered it at the level of "There's also something called the permanent, which is like the determinant but with all plus signs, and which is much less common than the determinant but still sometimes useful."
              – tparker
              Nov 16 at 5:12






            • 13




              On the topic, the wikipedia article on the permanent features the delightful sentence "multiplying any single row or column of $A$ by a scalar $s$ changes $perm(A)$ to $s cdot perm(A)$"
              – ekkilop
              2 days ago










            11




            11




            Wow, your freshman linear algebra class covered permanents?
            – bof
            Nov 16 at 5:09




            Wow, your freshman linear algebra class covered permanents?
            – bof
            Nov 16 at 5:09




            16




            16




            @bof I mean, I think the professor covered it at the level of "There's also something called the permanent, which is like the determinant but with all plus signs, and which is much less common than the determinant but still sometimes useful."
            – tparker
            Nov 16 at 5:12




            @bof I mean, I think the professor covered it at the level of "There's also something called the permanent, which is like the determinant but with all plus signs, and which is much less common than the determinant but still sometimes useful."
            – tparker
            Nov 16 at 5:12




            13




            13




            On the topic, the wikipedia article on the permanent features the delightful sentence "multiplying any single row or column of $A$ by a scalar $s$ changes $perm(A)$ to $s cdot perm(A)$"
            – ekkilop
            2 days ago






            On the topic, the wikipedia article on the permanent features the delightful sentence "multiplying any single row or column of $A$ by a scalar $s$ changes $perm(A)$ to $s cdot perm(A)$"
            – ekkilop
            2 days ago












            up vote
            20
            down vote













            The set of associated primes of an $R$-module $M$ is denoted by
            $$mathrm{Ass}_R(M) $$
            This is universal notation. Look in any textbook on commutative algebra.






            share|cite|improve this answer



























              up vote
              20
              down vote













              The set of associated primes of an $R$-module $M$ is denoted by
              $$mathrm{Ass}_R(M) $$
              This is universal notation. Look in any textbook on commutative algebra.






              share|cite|improve this answer

























                up vote
                20
                down vote










                up vote
                20
                down vote









                The set of associated primes of an $R$-module $M$ is denoted by
                $$mathrm{Ass}_R(M) $$
                This is universal notation. Look in any textbook on commutative algebra.






                share|cite|improve this answer














                The set of associated primes of an $R$-module $M$ is denoted by
                $$mathrm{Ass}_R(M) $$
                This is universal notation. Look in any textbook on commutative algebra.







                share|cite|improve this answer














                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer








                edited Nov 16 at 4:30


























                community wiki





                Matt Samuel























                    up vote
                    18
                    down vote













                    My Linear Algebra lecturer kept on talking about $s in X$ and $v_j$. The latter is more of a stretch, but I imagine both occur very frequently in the literature.






                    share|cite|improve this answer



















                    • 9




                      As does inevitably $b_j$ when you're already using $a_i$...
                      – Robert Wolfe
                      2 days ago















                    up vote
                    18
                    down vote













                    My Linear Algebra lecturer kept on talking about $s in X$ and $v_j$. The latter is more of a stretch, but I imagine both occur very frequently in the literature.






                    share|cite|improve this answer



















                    • 9




                      As does inevitably $b_j$ when you're already using $a_i$...
                      – Robert Wolfe
                      2 days ago













                    up vote
                    18
                    down vote










                    up vote
                    18
                    down vote









                    My Linear Algebra lecturer kept on talking about $s in X$ and $v_j$. The latter is more of a stretch, but I imagine both occur very frequently in the literature.






                    share|cite|improve this answer














                    My Linear Algebra lecturer kept on talking about $s in X$ and $v_j$. The latter is more of a stretch, but I imagine both occur very frequently in the literature.







                    share|cite|improve this answer














                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer








                    answered 2 days ago


























                    community wiki





                    Jared Norman









                    • 9




                      As does inevitably $b_j$ when you're already using $a_i$...
                      – Robert Wolfe
                      2 days ago














                    • 9




                      As does inevitably $b_j$ when you're already using $a_i$...
                      – Robert Wolfe
                      2 days ago








                    9




                    9




                    As does inevitably $b_j$ when you're already using $a_i$...
                    – Robert Wolfe
                    2 days ago




                    As does inevitably $b_j$ when you're already using $a_i$...
                    – Robert Wolfe
                    2 days ago










                    up vote
                    17
                    down vote













                    Perhaps a bit obscure, but perfectly serious:



                    The Cox-Zucker machine is an algorithm that determines if a set of sections provides a basis for the Mordell–Weil group of an elliptic surface $E → S$ where $S$ is isomorphic to the projective line.






                    share|cite|improve this answer



















                    • 4




                      The Talk page on Wikipedia has an (unsigned) claim that Dr. Cox specifically chose Dr. Zucker as a collaborator in order to produce the salacious-sounding name.
                      – Ross Presser
                      2 days ago










                    • Calling it a "machine" also seems deliberate - wouldn't "algorithm" be more usual?
                      – Michael Lugo
                      2 days ago










                    • @MichaelLugo There's a precedent for calling algorithms "machines", depending on how generic they are. See e.g. a Turing machine, which is just an algorithm with more vague variables than math normally has. I don't have enough of a math background to evaluate the Cox-Zucker machine to see if that's the case there.
                      – Nic Hartley
                      2 days ago















                    up vote
                    17
                    down vote













                    Perhaps a bit obscure, but perfectly serious:



                    The Cox-Zucker machine is an algorithm that determines if a set of sections provides a basis for the Mordell–Weil group of an elliptic surface $E → S$ where $S$ is isomorphic to the projective line.






                    share|cite|improve this answer



















                    • 4




                      The Talk page on Wikipedia has an (unsigned) claim that Dr. Cox specifically chose Dr. Zucker as a collaborator in order to produce the salacious-sounding name.
                      – Ross Presser
                      2 days ago










                    • Calling it a "machine" also seems deliberate - wouldn't "algorithm" be more usual?
                      – Michael Lugo
                      2 days ago










                    • @MichaelLugo There's a precedent for calling algorithms "machines", depending on how generic they are. See e.g. a Turing machine, which is just an algorithm with more vague variables than math normally has. I don't have enough of a math background to evaluate the Cox-Zucker machine to see if that's the case there.
                      – Nic Hartley
                      2 days ago













                    up vote
                    17
                    down vote










                    up vote
                    17
                    down vote









                    Perhaps a bit obscure, but perfectly serious:



                    The Cox-Zucker machine is an algorithm that determines if a set of sections provides a basis for the Mordell–Weil group of an elliptic surface $E → S$ where $S$ is isomorphic to the projective line.






                    share|cite|improve this answer














                    Perhaps a bit obscure, but perfectly serious:



                    The Cox-Zucker machine is an algorithm that determines if a set of sections provides a basis for the Mordell–Weil group of an elliptic surface $E → S$ where $S$ is isomorphic to the projective line.







                    share|cite|improve this answer














                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer








                    answered 2 days ago


























                    community wiki





                    aghostinthefigures









                    • 4




                      The Talk page on Wikipedia has an (unsigned) claim that Dr. Cox specifically chose Dr. Zucker as a collaborator in order to produce the salacious-sounding name.
                      – Ross Presser
                      2 days ago










                    • Calling it a "machine" also seems deliberate - wouldn't "algorithm" be more usual?
                      – Michael Lugo
                      2 days ago










                    • @MichaelLugo There's a precedent for calling algorithms "machines", depending on how generic they are. See e.g. a Turing machine, which is just an algorithm with more vague variables than math normally has. I don't have enough of a math background to evaluate the Cox-Zucker machine to see if that's the case there.
                      – Nic Hartley
                      2 days ago














                    • 4




                      The Talk page on Wikipedia has an (unsigned) claim that Dr. Cox specifically chose Dr. Zucker as a collaborator in order to produce the salacious-sounding name.
                      – Ross Presser
                      2 days ago










                    • Calling it a "machine" also seems deliberate - wouldn't "algorithm" be more usual?
                      – Michael Lugo
                      2 days ago










                    • @MichaelLugo There's a precedent for calling algorithms "machines", depending on how generic they are. See e.g. a Turing machine, which is just an algorithm with more vague variables than math normally has. I don't have enough of a math background to evaluate the Cox-Zucker machine to see if that's the case there.
                      – Nic Hartley
                      2 days ago








                    4




                    4




                    The Talk page on Wikipedia has an (unsigned) claim that Dr. Cox specifically chose Dr. Zucker as a collaborator in order to produce the salacious-sounding name.
                    – Ross Presser
                    2 days ago




                    The Talk page on Wikipedia has an (unsigned) claim that Dr. Cox specifically chose Dr. Zucker as a collaborator in order to produce the salacious-sounding name.
                    – Ross Presser
                    2 days ago












                    Calling it a "machine" also seems deliberate - wouldn't "algorithm" be more usual?
                    – Michael Lugo
                    2 days ago




                    Calling it a "machine" also seems deliberate - wouldn't "algorithm" be more usual?
                    – Michael Lugo
                    2 days ago












                    @MichaelLugo There's a precedent for calling algorithms "machines", depending on how generic they are. See e.g. a Turing machine, which is just an algorithm with more vague variables than math normally has. I don't have enough of a math background to evaluate the Cox-Zucker machine to see if that's the case there.
                    – Nic Hartley
                    2 days ago




                    @MichaelLugo There's a precedent for calling algorithms "machines", depending on how generic they are. See e.g. a Turing machine, which is just an algorithm with more vague variables than math normally has. I don't have enough of a math background to evaluate the Cox-Zucker machine to see if that's the case there.
                    – Nic Hartley
                    2 days ago










                    up vote
                    15
                    down vote













                    Crossing to a different science (so slightly off topic!). But Proton Enhanced Nuclear Induction Spectroscopy is a genuine NMR spectroscopy technique (and it's in a field where everything is known by acronyms so yeah it was deliberate...) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proton-enhanced_nuclear_induction_spectroscopy



                    Sadly it's usually known as Cross Polarisation (CP) nowadays.






                    share|cite|improve this answer























                    • I like this, especially since the linked Wikipedia page uses the original acronym :)
                      – Will Appleby
                      2 days ago






                    • 5




                      I never expected to read this setence in Wikipedia: "The PENIS technique was patented in 1972."
                      – Ral Zarek
                      2 days ago















                    up vote
                    15
                    down vote













                    Crossing to a different science (so slightly off topic!). But Proton Enhanced Nuclear Induction Spectroscopy is a genuine NMR spectroscopy technique (and it's in a field where everything is known by acronyms so yeah it was deliberate...) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proton-enhanced_nuclear_induction_spectroscopy



                    Sadly it's usually known as Cross Polarisation (CP) nowadays.






                    share|cite|improve this answer























                    • I like this, especially since the linked Wikipedia page uses the original acronym :)
                      – Will Appleby
                      2 days ago






                    • 5




                      I never expected to read this setence in Wikipedia: "The PENIS technique was patented in 1972."
                      – Ral Zarek
                      2 days ago













                    up vote
                    15
                    down vote










                    up vote
                    15
                    down vote









                    Crossing to a different science (so slightly off topic!). But Proton Enhanced Nuclear Induction Spectroscopy is a genuine NMR spectroscopy technique (and it's in a field where everything is known by acronyms so yeah it was deliberate...) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proton-enhanced_nuclear_induction_spectroscopy



                    Sadly it's usually known as Cross Polarisation (CP) nowadays.






                    share|cite|improve this answer














                    Crossing to a different science (so slightly off topic!). But Proton Enhanced Nuclear Induction Spectroscopy is a genuine NMR spectroscopy technique (and it's in a field where everything is known by acronyms so yeah it was deliberate...) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proton-enhanced_nuclear_induction_spectroscopy



                    Sadly it's usually known as Cross Polarisation (CP) nowadays.







                    share|cite|improve this answer














                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer








                    answered 2 days ago


























                    community wiki





                    jovisg













                    • I like this, especially since the linked Wikipedia page uses the original acronym :)
                      – Will Appleby
                      2 days ago






                    • 5




                      I never expected to read this setence in Wikipedia: "The PENIS technique was patented in 1972."
                      – Ral Zarek
                      2 days ago


















                    • I like this, especially since the linked Wikipedia page uses the original acronym :)
                      – Will Appleby
                      2 days ago






                    • 5




                      I never expected to read this setence in Wikipedia: "The PENIS technique was patented in 1972."
                      – Ral Zarek
                      2 days ago
















                    I like this, especially since the linked Wikipedia page uses the original acronym :)
                    – Will Appleby
                    2 days ago




                    I like this, especially since the linked Wikipedia page uses the original acronym :)
                    – Will Appleby
                    2 days ago




                    5




                    5




                    I never expected to read this setence in Wikipedia: "The PENIS technique was patented in 1972."
                    – Ral Zarek
                    2 days ago




                    I never expected to read this setence in Wikipedia: "The PENIS technique was patented in 1972."
                    – Ral Zarek
                    2 days ago










                    up vote
                    6
                    down vote













                    My Linear Algebra professor once referenced a matrix with $A_{RS}$. When the students laughed, he told us about a pamphlet from the end of the Thirty Years' War titled "Mars is in the Ars".






                    share|cite|improve this answer



















                    • 1




                      See also: the RSA cryptosystem, notably with its inventors' initials not in alphabetical order. (Although, it's more likely that Adleman thought he didn't contribute to it as much as Rivest and Shamir did.)
                      – Akiva Weinberger
                      yesterday

















                    up vote
                    6
                    down vote













                    My Linear Algebra professor once referenced a matrix with $A_{RS}$. When the students laughed, he told us about a pamphlet from the end of the Thirty Years' War titled "Mars is in the Ars".






                    share|cite|improve this answer



















                    • 1




                      See also: the RSA cryptosystem, notably with its inventors' initials not in alphabetical order. (Although, it's more likely that Adleman thought he didn't contribute to it as much as Rivest and Shamir did.)
                      – Akiva Weinberger
                      yesterday















                    up vote
                    6
                    down vote










                    up vote
                    6
                    down vote









                    My Linear Algebra professor once referenced a matrix with $A_{RS}$. When the students laughed, he told us about a pamphlet from the end of the Thirty Years' War titled "Mars is in the Ars".






                    share|cite|improve this answer














                    My Linear Algebra professor once referenced a matrix with $A_{RS}$. When the students laughed, he told us about a pamphlet from the end of the Thirty Years' War titled "Mars is in the Ars".







                    share|cite|improve this answer














                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer








                    answered 2 days ago


























                    community wiki





                    Robin









                    • 1




                      See also: the RSA cryptosystem, notably with its inventors' initials not in alphabetical order. (Although, it's more likely that Adleman thought he didn't contribute to it as much as Rivest and Shamir did.)
                      – Akiva Weinberger
                      yesterday
















                    • 1




                      See also: the RSA cryptosystem, notably with its inventors' initials not in alphabetical order. (Although, it's more likely that Adleman thought he didn't contribute to it as much as Rivest and Shamir did.)
                      – Akiva Weinberger
                      yesterday










                    1




                    1




                    See also: the RSA cryptosystem, notably with its inventors' initials not in alphabetical order. (Although, it's more likely that Adleman thought he didn't contribute to it as much as Rivest and Shamir did.)
                    – Akiva Weinberger
                    yesterday






                    See also: the RSA cryptosystem, notably with its inventors' initials not in alphabetical order. (Although, it's more likely that Adleman thought he didn't contribute to it as much as Rivest and Shamir did.)
                    – Akiva Weinberger
                    yesterday












                    up vote
                    4
                    down vote













                    I remember well that we had a book from a Professor Fick during my physics studies, and used to refer to it as the 'Fick-Book', often in public; to the consternation and shock of other people around us (in the tram, or in cafes)



                    [Fick is the german work for 'fuck']
                    https://de.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eugen_Fick






                    share|cite|improve this answer



























                      up vote
                      4
                      down vote













                      I remember well that we had a book from a Professor Fick during my physics studies, and used to refer to it as the 'Fick-Book', often in public; to the consternation and shock of other people around us (in the tram, or in cafes)



                      [Fick is the german work for 'fuck']
                      https://de.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eugen_Fick






                      share|cite|improve this answer

























                        up vote
                        4
                        down vote










                        up vote
                        4
                        down vote









                        I remember well that we had a book from a Professor Fick during my physics studies, and used to refer to it as the 'Fick-Book', often in public; to the consternation and shock of other people around us (in the tram, or in cafes)



                        [Fick is the german work for 'fuck']
                        https://de.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eugen_Fick






                        share|cite|improve this answer














                        I remember well that we had a book from a Professor Fick during my physics studies, and used to refer to it as the 'Fick-Book', often in public; to the consternation and shock of other people around us (in the tram, or in cafes)



                        [Fick is the german work for 'fuck']
                        https://de.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eugen_Fick







                        share|cite|improve this answer














                        share|cite|improve this answer



                        share|cite|improve this answer








                        answered 2 days ago


























                        community wiki





                        Aganju























                            up vote
                            2
                            down vote













                            One well-known example, that arose when branes were introduced into String Theory (physics), was that people studying $p$-dimensional branes were branded “$p$-brane theorists”. (Like some examples above, that is perhaps more a homonym of an explicative.)






                            share|cite|improve this answer



























                              up vote
                              2
                              down vote













                              One well-known example, that arose when branes were introduced into String Theory (physics), was that people studying $p$-dimensional branes were branded “$p$-brane theorists”. (Like some examples above, that is perhaps more a homonym of an explicative.)






                              share|cite|improve this answer

























                                up vote
                                2
                                down vote










                                up vote
                                2
                                down vote









                                One well-known example, that arose when branes were introduced into String Theory (physics), was that people studying $p$-dimensional branes were branded “$p$-brane theorists”. (Like some examples above, that is perhaps more a homonym of an explicative.)






                                share|cite|improve this answer














                                One well-known example, that arose when branes were introduced into String Theory (physics), was that people studying $p$-dimensional branes were branded “$p$-brane theorists”. (Like some examples above, that is perhaps more a homonym of an explicative.)







                                share|cite|improve this answer














                                share|cite|improve this answer



                                share|cite|improve this answer








                                answered 2 days ago


























                                community wiki





                                Lars H























                                    up vote
                                    2
                                    down vote













                                    It's more engineering than mathematics, but there is a well-known supplier of electronic test equipment called Wayne Kerr. You have to believe that the company name was chosen innocently by someone naive who hadn't talked to their shop-floor workers.






                                    share|cite|improve this answer



























                                      up vote
                                      2
                                      down vote













                                      It's more engineering than mathematics, but there is a well-known supplier of electronic test equipment called Wayne Kerr. You have to believe that the company name was chosen innocently by someone naive who hadn't talked to their shop-floor workers.






                                      share|cite|improve this answer

























                                        up vote
                                        2
                                        down vote










                                        up vote
                                        2
                                        down vote









                                        It's more engineering than mathematics, but there is a well-known supplier of electronic test equipment called Wayne Kerr. You have to believe that the company name was chosen innocently by someone naive who hadn't talked to their shop-floor workers.






                                        share|cite|improve this answer














                                        It's more engineering than mathematics, but there is a well-known supplier of electronic test equipment called Wayne Kerr. You have to believe that the company name was chosen innocently by someone naive who hadn't talked to their shop-floor workers.







                                        share|cite|improve this answer














                                        share|cite|improve this answer



                                        share|cite|improve this answer








                                        answered 2 days ago


























                                        community wiki





                                        Graham























                                            up vote
                                            2
                                            down vote













                                            The 1996 University of Cambridge Mathematical Tripos IB (second year undergraduate exam), Paper 1, had question 5D on Linear Mathematics ending with the sentence:




                                            Define the dual map $alpha^*$ and prove that $alpha^* f_r^* = sum_{s=1}^n a_{rs}e_s^*$, $1 le r le m$.







                                            share|cite|improve this answer



















                                            • 1




                                              Can you explain what this is hinting at? I don't see it at all.
                                              – Git Gud
                                              yesterday










                                            • @GitGud $a_{rs}e$ -> arse.
                                              – User
                                              yesterday












                                            • Indeed $a_{rs}e_s$ gives the plural "arses"!
                                              – Ben C
                                              yesterday















                                            up vote
                                            2
                                            down vote













                                            The 1996 University of Cambridge Mathematical Tripos IB (second year undergraduate exam), Paper 1, had question 5D on Linear Mathematics ending with the sentence:




                                            Define the dual map $alpha^*$ and prove that $alpha^* f_r^* = sum_{s=1}^n a_{rs}e_s^*$, $1 le r le m$.







                                            share|cite|improve this answer



















                                            • 1




                                              Can you explain what this is hinting at? I don't see it at all.
                                              – Git Gud
                                              yesterday










                                            • @GitGud $a_{rs}e$ -> arse.
                                              – User
                                              yesterday












                                            • Indeed $a_{rs}e_s$ gives the plural "arses"!
                                              – Ben C
                                              yesterday













                                            up vote
                                            2
                                            down vote










                                            up vote
                                            2
                                            down vote









                                            The 1996 University of Cambridge Mathematical Tripos IB (second year undergraduate exam), Paper 1, had question 5D on Linear Mathematics ending with the sentence:




                                            Define the dual map $alpha^*$ and prove that $alpha^* f_r^* = sum_{s=1}^n a_{rs}e_s^*$, $1 le r le m$.







                                            share|cite|improve this answer














                                            The 1996 University of Cambridge Mathematical Tripos IB (second year undergraduate exam), Paper 1, had question 5D on Linear Mathematics ending with the sentence:




                                            Define the dual map $alpha^*$ and prove that $alpha^* f_r^* = sum_{s=1}^n a_{rs}e_s^*$, $1 le r le m$.








                                            share|cite|improve this answer














                                            share|cite|improve this answer



                                            share|cite|improve this answer








                                            answered 2 days ago


























                                            community wiki





                                            Ben C









                                            • 1




                                              Can you explain what this is hinting at? I don't see it at all.
                                              – Git Gud
                                              yesterday










                                            • @GitGud $a_{rs}e$ -> arse.
                                              – User
                                              yesterday












                                            • Indeed $a_{rs}e_s$ gives the plural "arses"!
                                              – Ben C
                                              yesterday














                                            • 1




                                              Can you explain what this is hinting at? I don't see it at all.
                                              – Git Gud
                                              yesterday










                                            • @GitGud $a_{rs}e$ -> arse.
                                              – User
                                              yesterday












                                            • Indeed $a_{rs}e_s$ gives the plural "arses"!
                                              – Ben C
                                              yesterday








                                            1




                                            1




                                            Can you explain what this is hinting at? I don't see it at all.
                                            – Git Gud
                                            yesterday




                                            Can you explain what this is hinting at? I don't see it at all.
                                            – Git Gud
                                            yesterday












                                            @GitGud $a_{rs}e$ -> arse.
                                            – User
                                            yesterday






                                            @GitGud $a_{rs}e$ -> arse.
                                            – User
                                            yesterday














                                            Indeed $a_{rs}e_s$ gives the plural "arses"!
                                            – Ben C
                                            yesterday




                                            Indeed $a_{rs}e_s$ gives the plural "arses"!
                                            – Ben C
                                            yesterday










                                            up vote
                                            1
                                            down vote













                                            There is a certain Dr. Bagger who is active in Theoretical Physics (quite mathematical, at least to us experimentalists). He often works in collaboration with others and since his name is quite near the beginning of the alphabet, his citations lead to a witty coincidence (probably funnier for British people...).



                                            A typical reference to Dr. Bagger's work



                                            From page 181 of https://arxiv.org/pdf/hep-ph/0203079.pdf






                                            share|cite|improve this answer



















                                            • 1




                                              The Question asks about mathematical literature, which possibly could be broadly interpreted to include theoretical physics papers. However without a link or proper citation, it's hard to gauge how relevant your proposed example is. Perhaps a citation of the paper (in other literature) would serve this purpose.
                                              – hardmath
                                              2 days ago















                                            up vote
                                            1
                                            down vote













                                            There is a certain Dr. Bagger who is active in Theoretical Physics (quite mathematical, at least to us experimentalists). He often works in collaboration with others and since his name is quite near the beginning of the alphabet, his citations lead to a witty coincidence (probably funnier for British people...).



                                            A typical reference to Dr. Bagger's work



                                            From page 181 of https://arxiv.org/pdf/hep-ph/0203079.pdf






                                            share|cite|improve this answer



















                                            • 1




                                              The Question asks about mathematical literature, which possibly could be broadly interpreted to include theoretical physics papers. However without a link or proper citation, it's hard to gauge how relevant your proposed example is. Perhaps a citation of the paper (in other literature) would serve this purpose.
                                              – hardmath
                                              2 days ago













                                            up vote
                                            1
                                            down vote










                                            up vote
                                            1
                                            down vote









                                            There is a certain Dr. Bagger who is active in Theoretical Physics (quite mathematical, at least to us experimentalists). He often works in collaboration with others and since his name is quite near the beginning of the alphabet, his citations lead to a witty coincidence (probably funnier for British people...).



                                            A typical reference to Dr. Bagger's work



                                            From page 181 of https://arxiv.org/pdf/hep-ph/0203079.pdf






                                            share|cite|improve this answer














                                            There is a certain Dr. Bagger who is active in Theoretical Physics (quite mathematical, at least to us experimentalists). He often works in collaboration with others and since his name is quite near the beginning of the alphabet, his citations lead to a witty coincidence (probably funnier for British people...).



                                            A typical reference to Dr. Bagger's work



                                            From page 181 of https://arxiv.org/pdf/hep-ph/0203079.pdf







                                            share|cite|improve this answer














                                            share|cite|improve this answer



                                            share|cite|improve this answer








                                            edited 2 days ago


























                                            community wiki





                                            Oscar Bravo









                                            • 1




                                              The Question asks about mathematical literature, which possibly could be broadly interpreted to include theoretical physics papers. However without a link or proper citation, it's hard to gauge how relevant your proposed example is. Perhaps a citation of the paper (in other literature) would serve this purpose.
                                              – hardmath
                                              2 days ago














                                            • 1




                                              The Question asks about mathematical literature, which possibly could be broadly interpreted to include theoretical physics papers. However without a link or proper citation, it's hard to gauge how relevant your proposed example is. Perhaps a citation of the paper (in other literature) would serve this purpose.
                                              – hardmath
                                              2 days ago








                                            1




                                            1




                                            The Question asks about mathematical literature, which possibly could be broadly interpreted to include theoretical physics papers. However without a link or proper citation, it's hard to gauge how relevant your proposed example is. Perhaps a citation of the paper (in other literature) would serve this purpose.
                                            – hardmath
                                            2 days ago




                                            The Question asks about mathematical literature, which possibly could be broadly interpreted to include theoretical physics papers. However without a link or proper citation, it's hard to gauge how relevant your proposed example is. Perhaps a citation of the paper (in other literature) would serve this purpose.
                                            – hardmath
                                            2 days ago










                                            up vote
                                            1
                                            down vote













                                            I'm currently reading this paper https://arxiv.org/abs/1207.4750 (which, admittedly is physics not math) on page 5 they are describing a general procedure so they just give an example of an action which they denote as



                                            $$S_{ex}$$



                                            S because that is the traditional way of denoting an action, and ex because it's just a generic example that they trying to use






                                            share|cite|improve this answer



























                                              up vote
                                              1
                                              down vote













                                              I'm currently reading this paper https://arxiv.org/abs/1207.4750 (which, admittedly is physics not math) on page 5 they are describing a general procedure so they just give an example of an action which they denote as



                                              $$S_{ex}$$



                                              S because that is the traditional way of denoting an action, and ex because it's just a generic example that they trying to use






                                              share|cite|improve this answer

























                                                up vote
                                                1
                                                down vote










                                                up vote
                                                1
                                                down vote









                                                I'm currently reading this paper https://arxiv.org/abs/1207.4750 (which, admittedly is physics not math) on page 5 they are describing a general procedure so they just give an example of an action which they denote as



                                                $$S_{ex}$$



                                                S because that is the traditional way of denoting an action, and ex because it's just a generic example that they trying to use






                                                share|cite|improve this answer














                                                I'm currently reading this paper https://arxiv.org/abs/1207.4750 (which, admittedly is physics not math) on page 5 they are describing a general procedure so they just give an example of an action which they denote as



                                                $$S_{ex}$$



                                                S because that is the traditional way of denoting an action, and ex because it's just a generic example that they trying to use







                                                share|cite|improve this answer














                                                share|cite|improve this answer



                                                share|cite|improve this answer








                                                answered yesterday


























                                                community wiki





                                                yankyl























                                                    up vote
                                                    0
                                                    down vote













                                                    This happend digital electronic class. Teacher was explaining some circuit that she drawn on blackboard. Output was Q0 to Q7, every time she say Q2 we were chuckling. It took her some time to realize that Q2 (pronounced kudwa) is very similar to word kurwa (fuck or bitch, depend on context).






                                                    share|cite|improve this answer























                                                    • This is in Poland?
                                                      – Akiva Weinberger
                                                      yesterday















                                                    up vote
                                                    0
                                                    down vote













                                                    This happend digital electronic class. Teacher was explaining some circuit that she drawn on blackboard. Output was Q0 to Q7, every time she say Q2 we were chuckling. It took her some time to realize that Q2 (pronounced kudwa) is very similar to word kurwa (fuck or bitch, depend on context).






                                                    share|cite|improve this answer























                                                    • This is in Poland?
                                                      – Akiva Weinberger
                                                      yesterday













                                                    up vote
                                                    0
                                                    down vote










                                                    up vote
                                                    0
                                                    down vote









                                                    This happend digital electronic class. Teacher was explaining some circuit that she drawn on blackboard. Output was Q0 to Q7, every time she say Q2 we were chuckling. It took her some time to realize that Q2 (pronounced kudwa) is very similar to word kurwa (fuck or bitch, depend on context).






                                                    share|cite|improve this answer














                                                    This happend digital electronic class. Teacher was explaining some circuit that she drawn on blackboard. Output was Q0 to Q7, every time she say Q2 we were chuckling. It took her some time to realize that Q2 (pronounced kudwa) is very similar to word kurwa (fuck or bitch, depend on context).







                                                    share|cite|improve this answer














                                                    share|cite|improve this answer



                                                    share|cite|improve this answer








                                                    answered 2 days ago


























                                                    community wiki





                                                    lko













                                                    • This is in Poland?
                                                      – Akiva Weinberger
                                                      yesterday


















                                                    • This is in Poland?
                                                      – Akiva Weinberger
                                                      yesterday
















                                                    This is in Poland?
                                                    – Akiva Weinberger
                                                    yesterday




                                                    This is in Poland?
                                                    – Akiva Weinberger
                                                    yesterday



                                                    Popular posts from this blog

                                                    How did Captain America manage to do this?

                                                    迪纳利

                                                    南乌拉尔铁路局