Deferring a noun belonging to a preposition until after a conjunction

.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}

up vote
1
down vote

favorite

Is it grammatically correct to defer the use of a noun (belonging to preposition) until after a conjunction?

In order to scale to (deferred noun: multi-objective optimisation) and study multi-objective optimisation, ...

We demonstrate how one can help out with (deferred noun: poverty) and mitigate poverty in Africa.

... so that the community can open up to (deferred noun: migrant populations) and accept the cultures of migrant populations.

edited Jun 25 at 14:50

asked Jun 24 at 14:15

allsey87

294

bumped to the homepage by Community♦ yesterday

This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.

See a related Q about omission of subject from ELL: ell.stackexchange.com/questions/148269/…
– aesking
Jun 24 at 18:49

add a comment |

up vote
1
down vote

favorite

Is it grammatically correct to defer the use of a noun (belonging to preposition) until after a conjunction?

In order to scale to (deferred noun: multi-objective optimisation) and study multi-objective optimisation, ...

We demonstrate how one can help out with (deferred noun: poverty) and mitigate poverty in Africa.

... so that the community can open up to (deferred noun: migrant populations) and accept the cultures of migrant populations.

edited Jun 25 at 14:50

asked Jun 24 at 14:15

allsey87

294

bumped to the homepage by Community♦ yesterday

This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.

See a related Q about omission of subject from ELL: ell.stackexchange.com/questions/148269/…
– aesking
Jun 24 at 18:49

add a comment |

up vote
1
down vote

favorite

Is it grammatically correct to defer the use of a noun (belonging to preposition) until after a conjunction?

In order to scale to (deferred noun: multi-objective optimisation) and study multi-objective optimisation, ...

We demonstrate how one can help out with (deferred noun: poverty) and mitigate poverty in Africa.

... so that the community can open up to (deferred noun: migrant populations) and accept the cultures of migrant populations.

edited Jun 25 at 14:50

asked Jun 24 at 14:15

allsey87

294

Is it grammatically correct to defer the use of a noun (belonging to preposition) until after a conjunction?

In order to scale to (deferred noun: multi-objective optimisation) and study multi-objective optimisation, ...

We demonstrate how one can help out with (deferred noun: poverty) and mitigate poverty in Africa.

... so that the community can open up to (deferred noun: migrant populations) and accept the cultures of migrant populations.

syntax

edited Jun 25 at 14:50

asked Jun 24 at 14:15

allsey87

294

edited Jun 25 at 14:50

asked Jun 24 at 14:15

allsey87

294

edited Jun 25 at 14:50

asked Jun 24 at 14:15

allsey87

294

asked Jun 24 at 14:15

allsey87

294

asked Jun 24 at 14:15

allsey87

294

bumped to the homepage by Community♦ yesterday

This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.

bumped to the homepage by Community♦ yesterday

This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.

See a related Q about omission of subject from ELL: ell.stackexchange.com/questions/148269/…
– aesking
Jun 24 at 18:49

add a comment |

See a related Q about omission of subject from ELL: ell.stackexchange.com/questions/148269/…
– aesking
Jun 24 at 18:49

See a related Q about omission of subject from ELL: ell.stackexchange.com/questions/148269/…
– aesking
Jun 24 at 18:49

add a comment |

1 Answer
1

active

oldest

votes

up vote
0
down vote

These formulations are correct:

We demonstrate how one can help out and mitigate poverty in Africa.

... so that the community can open up and accept the cultures of migrant populations.

Your question is not clear to me, but I can tell you that all three of your sentences/formulations are bad when what you refer to as the deferred noun is missing.

These are no good:

In order to scale to and study multi-objective optimisation, ...

We demonstrate how one can help out with and mitigate poverty in Africa.

... so that the community can open up to and accept the cultures of migrant populations.

In addition, multi-objective optimisation sounds a bit wordy and hollow.

answered Jun 24 at 14:26

user280597

The deferred nouns are not missing in any of the sentences. They follow immediately after the second verbs.
– Jason Bassford
Jun 24 at 15:36

@ Jason Bassford Read what I said. I did not say they are missing. This is getting a little ridiculous. It is very clear to me that this website is not being properly monitored.
– user280597
Jun 24 at 15:48

@ Jason Bassford: This site is unfriendly and poorly managed. I shall not be here long. I just wanted to send you an unambiguous message and register my displeasure.
– user280597
Jun 24 at 16:00

@JasonBassford Patriot is completely correct. You've misatributed your own idea to them. It doesn't appear anywhere in their post
– Araucaria
Jun 25 at 0:03

I have updated the question to make what I am asking clearer, I meant to ask whether it is ok to move a otherwise repeated noun to after a conjunction such as "and"
– allsey87
Jun 25 at 14:53

add a comment |

Your Answer

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});

}
});

draft saved

draft discarded

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});

Post as a guest

Name

Required, but never shown

StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f451766%2fdeferring-a-noun-belonging-to-a-preposition-until-after-a-conjunction%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest

Name

Required, but never shown

1 Answer
1

active

oldest

votes

1 Answer
1

active

oldest

votes

up vote
0
down vote

These formulations are correct:

We demonstrate how one can help out and mitigate poverty in Africa.

... so that the community can open up and accept the cultures of migrant populations.

Your question is not clear to me, but I can tell you that all three of your sentences/formulations are bad when what you refer to as the deferred noun is missing.

These are no good:

In order to scale to and study multi-objective optimisation, ...

We demonstrate how one can help out with and mitigate poverty in Africa.

... so that the community can open up to and accept the cultures of migrant populations.

In addition, multi-objective optimisation sounds a bit wordy and hollow.

answered Jun 24 at 14:26

user280597

The deferred nouns are not missing in any of the sentences. They follow immediately after the second verbs.
– Jason Bassford
Jun 24 at 15:36

@ Jason Bassford Read what I said. I did not say they are missing. This is getting a little ridiculous. It is very clear to me that this website is not being properly monitored.
– user280597
Jun 24 at 15:48

@ Jason Bassford: This site is unfriendly and poorly managed. I shall not be here long. I just wanted to send you an unambiguous message and register my displeasure.
– user280597
Jun 24 at 16:00

@JasonBassford Patriot is completely correct. You've misatributed your own idea to them. It doesn't appear anywhere in their post
– Araucaria
Jun 25 at 0:03

I have updated the question to make what I am asking clearer, I meant to ask whether it is ok to move a otherwise repeated noun to after a conjunction such as "and"
– allsey87
Jun 25 at 14:53

add a comment |

up vote
0
down vote

These formulations are correct:

We demonstrate how one can help out and mitigate poverty in Africa.

... so that the community can open up and accept the cultures of migrant populations.

Your question is not clear to me, but I can tell you that all three of your sentences/formulations are bad when what you refer to as the deferred noun is missing.

These are no good:

In order to scale to and study multi-objective optimisation, ...

We demonstrate how one can help out with and mitigate poverty in Africa.

... so that the community can open up to and accept the cultures of migrant populations.

In addition, multi-objective optimisation sounds a bit wordy and hollow.

answered Jun 24 at 14:26

user280597

The deferred nouns are not missing in any of the sentences. They follow immediately after the second verbs.
– Jason Bassford
Jun 24 at 15:36

@ Jason Bassford Read what I said. I did not say they are missing. This is getting a little ridiculous. It is very clear to me that this website is not being properly monitored.
– user280597
Jun 24 at 15:48

@ Jason Bassford: This site is unfriendly and poorly managed. I shall not be here long. I just wanted to send you an unambiguous message and register my displeasure.
– user280597
Jun 24 at 16:00

@JasonBassford Patriot is completely correct. You've misatributed your own idea to them. It doesn't appear anywhere in their post
– Araucaria
Jun 25 at 0:03

I have updated the question to make what I am asking clearer, I meant to ask whether it is ok to move a otherwise repeated noun to after a conjunction such as "and"
– allsey87
Jun 25 at 14:53

add a comment |

up vote
0
down vote

These formulations are correct:

We demonstrate how one can help out and mitigate poverty in Africa.

... so that the community can open up and accept the cultures of migrant populations.

Your question is not clear to me, but I can tell you that all three of your sentences/formulations are bad when what you refer to as the deferred noun is missing.

These are no good:

In order to scale to and study multi-objective optimisation, ...

We demonstrate how one can help out with and mitigate poverty in Africa.

... so that the community can open up to and accept the cultures of migrant populations.

In addition, multi-objective optimisation sounds a bit wordy and hollow.

answered Jun 24 at 14:26

user280597

These formulations are correct:

We demonstrate how one can help out and mitigate poverty in Africa.

... so that the community can open up and accept the cultures of migrant populations.

Your question is not clear to me, but I can tell you that all three of your sentences/formulations are bad when what you refer to as the deferred noun is missing.

These are no good:

In order to scale to and study multi-objective optimisation, ...

We demonstrate how one can help out with and mitigate poverty in Africa.

... so that the community can open up to and accept the cultures of migrant populations.

In addition, multi-objective optimisation sounds a bit wordy and hollow.

answered Jun 24 at 14:26

user280597

answered Jun 24 at 14:26

user280597

answered Jun 24 at 14:26

user280597

answered Jun 24 at 14:26

user280597

The deferred nouns are not missing in any of the sentences. They follow immediately after the second verbs.
– Jason Bassford
Jun 24 at 15:36

@ Jason Bassford Read what I said. I did not say they are missing. This is getting a little ridiculous. It is very clear to me that this website is not being properly monitored.
– user280597
Jun 24 at 15:48

@ Jason Bassford: This site is unfriendly and poorly managed. I shall not be here long. I just wanted to send you an unambiguous message and register my displeasure.
– user280597
Jun 24 at 16:00

@JasonBassford Patriot is completely correct. You've misatributed your own idea to them. It doesn't appear anywhere in their post
– Araucaria
Jun 25 at 0:03

I have updated the question to make what I am asking clearer, I meant to ask whether it is ok to move a otherwise repeated noun to after a conjunction such as "and"
– allsey87
Jun 25 at 14:53

add a comment |

The deferred nouns are not missing in any of the sentences. They follow immediately after the second verbs.
– Jason Bassford
Jun 24 at 15:36

@ Jason Bassford Read what I said. I did not say they are missing. This is getting a little ridiculous. It is very clear to me that this website is not being properly monitored.
– user280597
Jun 24 at 15:48

@ Jason Bassford: This site is unfriendly and poorly managed. I shall not be here long. I just wanted to send you an unambiguous message and register my displeasure.
– user280597
Jun 24 at 16:00

@JasonBassford Patriot is completely correct. You've misatributed your own idea to them. It doesn't appear anywhere in their post
– Araucaria
Jun 25 at 0:03

I have updated the question to make what I am asking clearer, I meant to ask whether it is ok to move a otherwise repeated noun to after a conjunction such as "and"
– allsey87
Jun 25 at 14:53

The deferred nouns are not missing in any of the sentences. They follow immediately after the second verbs.
– Jason Bassford
Jun 24 at 15:36

@ Jason Bassford Read what I said. I did not say they are missing. This is getting a little ridiculous. It is very clear to me that this website is not being properly monitored.
– user280597
Jun 24 at 15:48

@ Jason Bassford: This site is unfriendly and poorly managed. I shall not be here long. I just wanted to send you an unambiguous message and register my displeasure.
– user280597
Jun 24 at 16:00

@JasonBassford Patriot is completely correct. You've misatributed your own idea to them. It doesn't appear anywhere in their post
– Araucaria
Jun 25 at 0:03

I have updated the question to make what I am asking clearer, I meant to ask whether it is ok to move a otherwise repeated noun to after a conjunction such as "and"
– allsey87
Jun 25 at 14:53

add a comment |

draft saved

draft discarded

draft saved

draft discarded

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});

Post as a guest

Name

Required, but never shown

Post as a guest

Name

Required, but never shown

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});

Post as a guest

Name

Required, but never shown

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});

Post as a guest

Name

Required, but never shown

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});

Post as a guest

Name

Required, but never shown

Name

Required, but never shown

Name

Required, but never shown

This page is only for reference, If you need detailed information, please check here

搜尋此網誌

Cfxtrjtrk