Japanese Temple Problem From 1844











up vote
36
down vote

favorite
20












I recently learnt a Japanese geometry temple problem.



The problem is the following:



Five squares are arranged as the image shows. Prove that the area of triangle T and the area of square S are equal.





This is problem 6 in this article.
I am thinking about law of cosines, but I have not been able to prove the theorem. Any hints would be appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question




























    up vote
    36
    down vote

    favorite
    20












    I recently learnt a Japanese geometry temple problem.



    The problem is the following:



    Five squares are arranged as the image shows. Prove that the area of triangle T and the area of square S are equal.





    This is problem 6 in this article.
    I am thinking about law of cosines, but I have not been able to prove the theorem. Any hints would be appreciated.










    share|cite|improve this question


























      up vote
      36
      down vote

      favorite
      20









      up vote
      36
      down vote

      favorite
      20






      20





      I recently learnt a Japanese geometry temple problem.



      The problem is the following:



      Five squares are arranged as the image shows. Prove that the area of triangle T and the area of square S are equal.





      This is problem 6 in this article.
      I am thinking about law of cosines, but I have not been able to prove the theorem. Any hints would be appreciated.










      share|cite|improve this question















      I recently learnt a Japanese geometry temple problem.



      The problem is the following:



      Five squares are arranged as the image shows. Prove that the area of triangle T and the area of square S are equal.





      This is problem 6 in this article.
      I am thinking about law of cosines, but I have not been able to prove the theorem. Any hints would be appreciated.







      geometry sangaku






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited yesterday









      Jean-Claude Arbaut

      14.6k63362




      14.6k63362










      asked yesterday









      Larry

      1,0241522




      1,0241522






















          5 Answers
          5






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          28
          down vote



          accepted










          We will, first of all, prove a very interesting property




          $mathbf{Lemma;1}$



          Given two squares PQRS and PTUV (as shown on the picture), the triangles $Delta STP$ and $Delta PVQ$ have equal area.




          $mathbf {Proof}$



          enter image description here



          Denote by $alpha$ the angle SPT and by $[...]$ the area of the polygon "...". Hence
          $$[Delta STP]=frac{overline {PS}cdotoverline {PT}cdot sin(alpha)}{2}$$ $$[Delta PVQ]=frac{overline {QP}*overline {PV}cdotsinBigl(360°-(90°+90+alpha)Bigr)}{2}=frac{overline {QP}cdotoverline {PV}cdotsinBigl(180°-alphaBigr)}{2}=frac{overline {QP}cdotoverline {PV}cdotsin(alpha)}{2}$$



          Since $overline {PS}=overline {PQ}$ and $overline {PT}=overline {PV}$ $$[Delta STP]=[Delta PVQ]$$



          Now, back to the problem



          enter image description here
          Let $overline {AB}=a$ and $overline {IJ}=b$. Note first of all that $$Delta BEC cong Delta EIF$$
          See why? $mathbf {Hint:}$




          It is obvious that $overline {CE}=overline {EF}$. Use the properties of right triangles in order to show that all angles are equal.




          Thus $${(overline{CE})^2}={a^2}+{b^2}=S$$



          Note furthermore that $$[Delta BEC]=[Delta EIF]=frac{ab}{2}$$
          By Lemma 1:
          $$[Delta DCG]=[Delta BEC]=frac{ab}{2}=[Delta EIF]=[Delta GFK]$$
          The area of the polygon AJKGD is thus
          $$[AJKGD]=[ABCD]+[CEFG]+[FIJK]+4[Delta DCG]=2Bigl({a^2}+{b^2}Bigr)+2ab$$



          The area of the trapezoid AJKD is moreover
          $$[AJKD]=frac{(a+b)(2a+2b)}{2}={a^2}+2ab+{b^2}$$



          Finally
          $$T=[Delta DKG]=[AJKGD]-[AJKD]={a^2}+{b^2}=S Rightarrow S=T$$






          share|cite|improve this answer



















          • 3




            Nice. Maybe one can simplify the proof of the Lemma. Rotate $QPV$ by $pi/2$ clokwise around $P$; you get a triangle with the same basis and same heigth as $PST$.
            – D. Thomine
            yesterday










          • @Dr. Mathva: Thank you so much for your answer!
            – Larry
            yesterday








          • 7




            "+1, and I almost never +1 a rival answer" - that's a bit unpleasant
            – Mitch Wheat
            23 hours ago










          • How do you know that BEC and EIF are right triangles?
            – Cooper Buckingham
            11 hours ago










          • @Cooper Buckingham: It is one of the given conditions.
            – Larry
            11 hours ago


















          up vote
          13
          down vote













          enter image description here



          $$|square P_1 P_2 P_3 P_4| = (a+b)^2 = frac12(a+b)(2a+2b) = |square Q_1 Q_2 Q_3 Q_4|quad=:R$$




          $$S ;=; R - 4cdotfrac12ab ;=; T$$




          (This space intentionally left blank.)






          share|cite|improve this answer



















          • 1




            I wonder what tools you use to create awesome graphs like this
            – Larry
            14 hours ago








          • 2




            @Larry: I use GeoGebra.
            – Blue
            9 hours ago










          • I see, thank you.
            – Larry
            9 hours ago


















          up vote
          8
          down vote













          While the other solutions are obviously correct, they are also unnecessarily complicated.

          Since the angle of the squares is not specified, it must be true for all angles, so why not pick one which is simple to work with and results in a degenerate case.



          enter image description here






          share|cite|improve this answer

















          • 4




            That's a beautiful drawing, but I'm not sure if "Since the angle of the squares is not specified, it must be true for all angles" is logically sound here. It seems to be assuming the truth of the answer.
            – Owen
            5 hours ago


















          up vote
          7
          down vote













          Because there are so many squares, coordinates are easy to compute.



          enter image description here



          The area of the shaded square is clearly $u^2+v^2$.



          The area of the shaded triangle is one-half of the absolute value of the determinant of the array



          $$left[ begin{array}{c}
          1 & 1 & 1 \
          2u-v & 3u & 2u \
          3u+v & u+3v & u+v
          end{array} right]$$



          which is also $u^2+v^2$.






          share|cite|improve this answer




























            up vote
            1
            down vote













            This is a long comment.



            The shapes $S,,T$ share a vertex $A$ where six angles meet, three of them right angles. The other three angles therefore sum to a right angle. Let $theta$ be the angle in $T$, so the two other acute angles, and the right angle between them from $S$, sum to $pi-theta$. Since $sintheta=sin(pi-theta)$, $T$ has the same area as $triangle ABC$, where $BA,,AC$ are sides of the upper squares.



            The challenge, then, is to show $S$ has that much area too. Let $D$ denote the vertex of $S$ opposite $A$. I suspect we can show the quadrilateral $BACD$ has twice the area of $S$, and also twice the area of $triangle ABC$.






            share|cite|improve this answer





















            • I don't think that $BACD$ has twice the area of $ABC$. If you try to move $ABC$ by shearing to get a triangle with side $BC$ and something on the bottom line, the third point isn't $D$.
              – D. Thomine
              yesterday










            • $BACD$ is a rhombus because its opposite sides are parallel. So it does have twice the area of $ABC$.
              – I like Serena
              yesterday










            • $BACD$ is not a rhombus.
              – D. Thomine
              yesterday










            • Sorry, I meant parallellogram @D.Thomine.
              – I like Serena
              yesterday






            • 1




              @Servaes It's too long. "Long comment" is something people often say when their contribution has to be an "answer" because of software limitations, but is far from a complete answer.
              – J.G.
              18 hours ago











            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3009635%2fjapanese-temple-problem-from-1844%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            5 Answers
            5






            active

            oldest

            votes








            5 Answers
            5






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            28
            down vote



            accepted










            We will, first of all, prove a very interesting property




            $mathbf{Lemma;1}$



            Given two squares PQRS and PTUV (as shown on the picture), the triangles $Delta STP$ and $Delta PVQ$ have equal area.




            $mathbf {Proof}$



            enter image description here



            Denote by $alpha$ the angle SPT and by $[...]$ the area of the polygon "...". Hence
            $$[Delta STP]=frac{overline {PS}cdotoverline {PT}cdot sin(alpha)}{2}$$ $$[Delta PVQ]=frac{overline {QP}*overline {PV}cdotsinBigl(360°-(90°+90+alpha)Bigr)}{2}=frac{overline {QP}cdotoverline {PV}cdotsinBigl(180°-alphaBigr)}{2}=frac{overline {QP}cdotoverline {PV}cdotsin(alpha)}{2}$$



            Since $overline {PS}=overline {PQ}$ and $overline {PT}=overline {PV}$ $$[Delta STP]=[Delta PVQ]$$



            Now, back to the problem



            enter image description here
            Let $overline {AB}=a$ and $overline {IJ}=b$. Note first of all that $$Delta BEC cong Delta EIF$$
            See why? $mathbf {Hint:}$




            It is obvious that $overline {CE}=overline {EF}$. Use the properties of right triangles in order to show that all angles are equal.




            Thus $${(overline{CE})^2}={a^2}+{b^2}=S$$



            Note furthermore that $$[Delta BEC]=[Delta EIF]=frac{ab}{2}$$
            By Lemma 1:
            $$[Delta DCG]=[Delta BEC]=frac{ab}{2}=[Delta EIF]=[Delta GFK]$$
            The area of the polygon AJKGD is thus
            $$[AJKGD]=[ABCD]+[CEFG]+[FIJK]+4[Delta DCG]=2Bigl({a^2}+{b^2}Bigr)+2ab$$



            The area of the trapezoid AJKD is moreover
            $$[AJKD]=frac{(a+b)(2a+2b)}{2}={a^2}+2ab+{b^2}$$



            Finally
            $$T=[Delta DKG]=[AJKGD]-[AJKD]={a^2}+{b^2}=S Rightarrow S=T$$






            share|cite|improve this answer



















            • 3




              Nice. Maybe one can simplify the proof of the Lemma. Rotate $QPV$ by $pi/2$ clokwise around $P$; you get a triangle with the same basis and same heigth as $PST$.
              – D. Thomine
              yesterday










            • @Dr. Mathva: Thank you so much for your answer!
              – Larry
              yesterday








            • 7




              "+1, and I almost never +1 a rival answer" - that's a bit unpleasant
              – Mitch Wheat
              23 hours ago










            • How do you know that BEC and EIF are right triangles?
              – Cooper Buckingham
              11 hours ago










            • @Cooper Buckingham: It is one of the given conditions.
              – Larry
              11 hours ago















            up vote
            28
            down vote



            accepted










            We will, first of all, prove a very interesting property




            $mathbf{Lemma;1}$



            Given two squares PQRS and PTUV (as shown on the picture), the triangles $Delta STP$ and $Delta PVQ$ have equal area.




            $mathbf {Proof}$



            enter image description here



            Denote by $alpha$ the angle SPT and by $[...]$ the area of the polygon "...". Hence
            $$[Delta STP]=frac{overline {PS}cdotoverline {PT}cdot sin(alpha)}{2}$$ $$[Delta PVQ]=frac{overline {QP}*overline {PV}cdotsinBigl(360°-(90°+90+alpha)Bigr)}{2}=frac{overline {QP}cdotoverline {PV}cdotsinBigl(180°-alphaBigr)}{2}=frac{overline {QP}cdotoverline {PV}cdotsin(alpha)}{2}$$



            Since $overline {PS}=overline {PQ}$ and $overline {PT}=overline {PV}$ $$[Delta STP]=[Delta PVQ]$$



            Now, back to the problem



            enter image description here
            Let $overline {AB}=a$ and $overline {IJ}=b$. Note first of all that $$Delta BEC cong Delta EIF$$
            See why? $mathbf {Hint:}$




            It is obvious that $overline {CE}=overline {EF}$. Use the properties of right triangles in order to show that all angles are equal.




            Thus $${(overline{CE})^2}={a^2}+{b^2}=S$$



            Note furthermore that $$[Delta BEC]=[Delta EIF]=frac{ab}{2}$$
            By Lemma 1:
            $$[Delta DCG]=[Delta BEC]=frac{ab}{2}=[Delta EIF]=[Delta GFK]$$
            The area of the polygon AJKGD is thus
            $$[AJKGD]=[ABCD]+[CEFG]+[FIJK]+4[Delta DCG]=2Bigl({a^2}+{b^2}Bigr)+2ab$$



            The area of the trapezoid AJKD is moreover
            $$[AJKD]=frac{(a+b)(2a+2b)}{2}={a^2}+2ab+{b^2}$$



            Finally
            $$T=[Delta DKG]=[AJKGD]-[AJKD]={a^2}+{b^2}=S Rightarrow S=T$$






            share|cite|improve this answer



















            • 3




              Nice. Maybe one can simplify the proof of the Lemma. Rotate $QPV$ by $pi/2$ clokwise around $P$; you get a triangle with the same basis and same heigth as $PST$.
              – D. Thomine
              yesterday










            • @Dr. Mathva: Thank you so much for your answer!
              – Larry
              yesterday








            • 7




              "+1, and I almost never +1 a rival answer" - that's a bit unpleasant
              – Mitch Wheat
              23 hours ago










            • How do you know that BEC and EIF are right triangles?
              – Cooper Buckingham
              11 hours ago










            • @Cooper Buckingham: It is one of the given conditions.
              – Larry
              11 hours ago













            up vote
            28
            down vote



            accepted







            up vote
            28
            down vote



            accepted






            We will, first of all, prove a very interesting property




            $mathbf{Lemma;1}$



            Given two squares PQRS and PTUV (as shown on the picture), the triangles $Delta STP$ and $Delta PVQ$ have equal area.




            $mathbf {Proof}$



            enter image description here



            Denote by $alpha$ the angle SPT and by $[...]$ the area of the polygon "...". Hence
            $$[Delta STP]=frac{overline {PS}cdotoverline {PT}cdot sin(alpha)}{2}$$ $$[Delta PVQ]=frac{overline {QP}*overline {PV}cdotsinBigl(360°-(90°+90+alpha)Bigr)}{2}=frac{overline {QP}cdotoverline {PV}cdotsinBigl(180°-alphaBigr)}{2}=frac{overline {QP}cdotoverline {PV}cdotsin(alpha)}{2}$$



            Since $overline {PS}=overline {PQ}$ and $overline {PT}=overline {PV}$ $$[Delta STP]=[Delta PVQ]$$



            Now, back to the problem



            enter image description here
            Let $overline {AB}=a$ and $overline {IJ}=b$. Note first of all that $$Delta BEC cong Delta EIF$$
            See why? $mathbf {Hint:}$




            It is obvious that $overline {CE}=overline {EF}$. Use the properties of right triangles in order to show that all angles are equal.




            Thus $${(overline{CE})^2}={a^2}+{b^2}=S$$



            Note furthermore that $$[Delta BEC]=[Delta EIF]=frac{ab}{2}$$
            By Lemma 1:
            $$[Delta DCG]=[Delta BEC]=frac{ab}{2}=[Delta EIF]=[Delta GFK]$$
            The area of the polygon AJKGD is thus
            $$[AJKGD]=[ABCD]+[CEFG]+[FIJK]+4[Delta DCG]=2Bigl({a^2}+{b^2}Bigr)+2ab$$



            The area of the trapezoid AJKD is moreover
            $$[AJKD]=frac{(a+b)(2a+2b)}{2}={a^2}+2ab+{b^2}$$



            Finally
            $$T=[Delta DKG]=[AJKGD]-[AJKD]={a^2}+{b^2}=S Rightarrow S=T$$






            share|cite|improve this answer














            We will, first of all, prove a very interesting property




            $mathbf{Lemma;1}$



            Given two squares PQRS and PTUV (as shown on the picture), the triangles $Delta STP$ and $Delta PVQ$ have equal area.




            $mathbf {Proof}$



            enter image description here



            Denote by $alpha$ the angle SPT and by $[...]$ the area of the polygon "...". Hence
            $$[Delta STP]=frac{overline {PS}cdotoverline {PT}cdot sin(alpha)}{2}$$ $$[Delta PVQ]=frac{overline {QP}*overline {PV}cdotsinBigl(360°-(90°+90+alpha)Bigr)}{2}=frac{overline {QP}cdotoverline {PV}cdotsinBigl(180°-alphaBigr)}{2}=frac{overline {QP}cdotoverline {PV}cdotsin(alpha)}{2}$$



            Since $overline {PS}=overline {PQ}$ and $overline {PT}=overline {PV}$ $$[Delta STP]=[Delta PVQ]$$



            Now, back to the problem



            enter image description here
            Let $overline {AB}=a$ and $overline {IJ}=b$. Note first of all that $$Delta BEC cong Delta EIF$$
            See why? $mathbf {Hint:}$




            It is obvious that $overline {CE}=overline {EF}$. Use the properties of right triangles in order to show that all angles are equal.




            Thus $${(overline{CE})^2}={a^2}+{b^2}=S$$



            Note furthermore that $$[Delta BEC]=[Delta EIF]=frac{ab}{2}$$
            By Lemma 1:
            $$[Delta DCG]=[Delta BEC]=frac{ab}{2}=[Delta EIF]=[Delta GFK]$$
            The area of the polygon AJKGD is thus
            $$[AJKGD]=[ABCD]+[CEFG]+[FIJK]+4[Delta DCG]=2Bigl({a^2}+{b^2}Bigr)+2ab$$



            The area of the trapezoid AJKD is moreover
            $$[AJKD]=frac{(a+b)(2a+2b)}{2}={a^2}+2ab+{b^2}$$



            Finally
            $$T=[Delta DKG]=[AJKGD]-[AJKD]={a^2}+{b^2}=S Rightarrow S=T$$







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited 21 hours ago









            Mutantoe

            542411




            542411










            answered yesterday









            Dr. Mathva

            36517




            36517








            • 3




              Nice. Maybe one can simplify the proof of the Lemma. Rotate $QPV$ by $pi/2$ clokwise around $P$; you get a triangle with the same basis and same heigth as $PST$.
              – D. Thomine
              yesterday










            • @Dr. Mathva: Thank you so much for your answer!
              – Larry
              yesterday








            • 7




              "+1, and I almost never +1 a rival answer" - that's a bit unpleasant
              – Mitch Wheat
              23 hours ago










            • How do you know that BEC and EIF are right triangles?
              – Cooper Buckingham
              11 hours ago










            • @Cooper Buckingham: It is one of the given conditions.
              – Larry
              11 hours ago














            • 3




              Nice. Maybe one can simplify the proof of the Lemma. Rotate $QPV$ by $pi/2$ clokwise around $P$; you get a triangle with the same basis and same heigth as $PST$.
              – D. Thomine
              yesterday










            • @Dr. Mathva: Thank you so much for your answer!
              – Larry
              yesterday








            • 7




              "+1, and I almost never +1 a rival answer" - that's a bit unpleasant
              – Mitch Wheat
              23 hours ago










            • How do you know that BEC and EIF are right triangles?
              – Cooper Buckingham
              11 hours ago










            • @Cooper Buckingham: It is one of the given conditions.
              – Larry
              11 hours ago








            3




            3




            Nice. Maybe one can simplify the proof of the Lemma. Rotate $QPV$ by $pi/2$ clokwise around $P$; you get a triangle with the same basis and same heigth as $PST$.
            – D. Thomine
            yesterday




            Nice. Maybe one can simplify the proof of the Lemma. Rotate $QPV$ by $pi/2$ clokwise around $P$; you get a triangle with the same basis and same heigth as $PST$.
            – D. Thomine
            yesterday












            @Dr. Mathva: Thank you so much for your answer!
            – Larry
            yesterday






            @Dr. Mathva: Thank you so much for your answer!
            – Larry
            yesterday






            7




            7




            "+1, and I almost never +1 a rival answer" - that's a bit unpleasant
            – Mitch Wheat
            23 hours ago




            "+1, and I almost never +1 a rival answer" - that's a bit unpleasant
            – Mitch Wheat
            23 hours ago












            How do you know that BEC and EIF are right triangles?
            – Cooper Buckingham
            11 hours ago




            How do you know that BEC and EIF are right triangles?
            – Cooper Buckingham
            11 hours ago












            @Cooper Buckingham: It is one of the given conditions.
            – Larry
            11 hours ago




            @Cooper Buckingham: It is one of the given conditions.
            – Larry
            11 hours ago










            up vote
            13
            down vote













            enter image description here



            $$|square P_1 P_2 P_3 P_4| = (a+b)^2 = frac12(a+b)(2a+2b) = |square Q_1 Q_2 Q_3 Q_4|quad=:R$$




            $$S ;=; R - 4cdotfrac12ab ;=; T$$




            (This space intentionally left blank.)






            share|cite|improve this answer



















            • 1




              I wonder what tools you use to create awesome graphs like this
              – Larry
              14 hours ago








            • 2




              @Larry: I use GeoGebra.
              – Blue
              9 hours ago










            • I see, thank you.
              – Larry
              9 hours ago















            up vote
            13
            down vote













            enter image description here



            $$|square P_1 P_2 P_3 P_4| = (a+b)^2 = frac12(a+b)(2a+2b) = |square Q_1 Q_2 Q_3 Q_4|quad=:R$$




            $$S ;=; R - 4cdotfrac12ab ;=; T$$




            (This space intentionally left blank.)






            share|cite|improve this answer



















            • 1




              I wonder what tools you use to create awesome graphs like this
              – Larry
              14 hours ago








            • 2




              @Larry: I use GeoGebra.
              – Blue
              9 hours ago










            • I see, thank you.
              – Larry
              9 hours ago













            up vote
            13
            down vote










            up vote
            13
            down vote









            enter image description here



            $$|square P_1 P_2 P_3 P_4| = (a+b)^2 = frac12(a+b)(2a+2b) = |square Q_1 Q_2 Q_3 Q_4|quad=:R$$




            $$S ;=; R - 4cdotfrac12ab ;=; T$$




            (This space intentionally left blank.)






            share|cite|improve this answer














            enter image description here



            $$|square P_1 P_2 P_3 P_4| = (a+b)^2 = frac12(a+b)(2a+2b) = |square Q_1 Q_2 Q_3 Q_4|quad=:R$$




            $$S ;=; R - 4cdotfrac12ab ;=; T$$




            (This space intentionally left blank.)







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited 22 hours ago

























            answered yesterday









            Blue

            46.4k869147




            46.4k869147








            • 1




              I wonder what tools you use to create awesome graphs like this
              – Larry
              14 hours ago








            • 2




              @Larry: I use GeoGebra.
              – Blue
              9 hours ago










            • I see, thank you.
              – Larry
              9 hours ago














            • 1




              I wonder what tools you use to create awesome graphs like this
              – Larry
              14 hours ago








            • 2




              @Larry: I use GeoGebra.
              – Blue
              9 hours ago










            • I see, thank you.
              – Larry
              9 hours ago








            1




            1




            I wonder what tools you use to create awesome graphs like this
            – Larry
            14 hours ago






            I wonder what tools you use to create awesome graphs like this
            – Larry
            14 hours ago






            2




            2




            @Larry: I use GeoGebra.
            – Blue
            9 hours ago




            @Larry: I use GeoGebra.
            – Blue
            9 hours ago












            I see, thank you.
            – Larry
            9 hours ago




            I see, thank you.
            – Larry
            9 hours ago










            up vote
            8
            down vote













            While the other solutions are obviously correct, they are also unnecessarily complicated.

            Since the angle of the squares is not specified, it must be true for all angles, so why not pick one which is simple to work with and results in a degenerate case.



            enter image description here






            share|cite|improve this answer

















            • 4




              That's a beautiful drawing, but I'm not sure if "Since the angle of the squares is not specified, it must be true for all angles" is logically sound here. It seems to be assuming the truth of the answer.
              – Owen
              5 hours ago















            up vote
            8
            down vote













            While the other solutions are obviously correct, they are also unnecessarily complicated.

            Since the angle of the squares is not specified, it must be true for all angles, so why not pick one which is simple to work with and results in a degenerate case.



            enter image description here






            share|cite|improve this answer

















            • 4




              That's a beautiful drawing, but I'm not sure if "Since the angle of the squares is not specified, it must be true for all angles" is logically sound here. It seems to be assuming the truth of the answer.
              – Owen
              5 hours ago













            up vote
            8
            down vote










            up vote
            8
            down vote









            While the other solutions are obviously correct, they are also unnecessarily complicated.

            Since the angle of the squares is not specified, it must be true for all angles, so why not pick one which is simple to work with and results in a degenerate case.



            enter image description here






            share|cite|improve this answer












            While the other solutions are obviously correct, they are also unnecessarily complicated.

            Since the angle of the squares is not specified, it must be true for all angles, so why not pick one which is simple to work with and results in a degenerate case.



            enter image description here







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered 9 hours ago









            DenDenDo

            50348




            50348








            • 4




              That's a beautiful drawing, but I'm not sure if "Since the angle of the squares is not specified, it must be true for all angles" is logically sound here. It seems to be assuming the truth of the answer.
              – Owen
              5 hours ago














            • 4




              That's a beautiful drawing, but I'm not sure if "Since the angle of the squares is not specified, it must be true for all angles" is logically sound here. It seems to be assuming the truth of the answer.
              – Owen
              5 hours ago








            4




            4




            That's a beautiful drawing, but I'm not sure if "Since the angle of the squares is not specified, it must be true for all angles" is logically sound here. It seems to be assuming the truth of the answer.
            – Owen
            5 hours ago




            That's a beautiful drawing, but I'm not sure if "Since the angle of the squares is not specified, it must be true for all angles" is logically sound here. It seems to be assuming the truth of the answer.
            – Owen
            5 hours ago










            up vote
            7
            down vote













            Because there are so many squares, coordinates are easy to compute.



            enter image description here



            The area of the shaded square is clearly $u^2+v^2$.



            The area of the shaded triangle is one-half of the absolute value of the determinant of the array



            $$left[ begin{array}{c}
            1 & 1 & 1 \
            2u-v & 3u & 2u \
            3u+v & u+3v & u+v
            end{array} right]$$



            which is also $u^2+v^2$.






            share|cite|improve this answer

























              up vote
              7
              down vote













              Because there are so many squares, coordinates are easy to compute.



              enter image description here



              The area of the shaded square is clearly $u^2+v^2$.



              The area of the shaded triangle is one-half of the absolute value of the determinant of the array



              $$left[ begin{array}{c}
              1 & 1 & 1 \
              2u-v & 3u & 2u \
              3u+v & u+3v & u+v
              end{array} right]$$



              which is also $u^2+v^2$.






              share|cite|improve this answer























                up vote
                7
                down vote










                up vote
                7
                down vote









                Because there are so many squares, coordinates are easy to compute.



                enter image description here



                The area of the shaded square is clearly $u^2+v^2$.



                The area of the shaded triangle is one-half of the absolute value of the determinant of the array



                $$left[ begin{array}{c}
                1 & 1 & 1 \
                2u-v & 3u & 2u \
                3u+v & u+3v & u+v
                end{array} right]$$



                which is also $u^2+v^2$.






                share|cite|improve this answer












                Because there are so many squares, coordinates are easy to compute.



                enter image description here



                The area of the shaded square is clearly $u^2+v^2$.



                The area of the shaded triangle is one-half of the absolute value of the determinant of the array



                $$left[ begin{array}{c}
                1 & 1 & 1 \
                2u-v & 3u & 2u \
                3u+v & u+3v & u+v
                end{array} right]$$



                which is also $u^2+v^2$.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered 14 hours ago









                steven gregory

                17.4k22256




                17.4k22256






















                    up vote
                    1
                    down vote













                    This is a long comment.



                    The shapes $S,,T$ share a vertex $A$ where six angles meet, three of them right angles. The other three angles therefore sum to a right angle. Let $theta$ be the angle in $T$, so the two other acute angles, and the right angle between them from $S$, sum to $pi-theta$. Since $sintheta=sin(pi-theta)$, $T$ has the same area as $triangle ABC$, where $BA,,AC$ are sides of the upper squares.



                    The challenge, then, is to show $S$ has that much area too. Let $D$ denote the vertex of $S$ opposite $A$. I suspect we can show the quadrilateral $BACD$ has twice the area of $S$, and also twice the area of $triangle ABC$.






                    share|cite|improve this answer





















                    • I don't think that $BACD$ has twice the area of $ABC$. If you try to move $ABC$ by shearing to get a triangle with side $BC$ and something on the bottom line, the third point isn't $D$.
                      – D. Thomine
                      yesterday










                    • $BACD$ is a rhombus because its opposite sides are parallel. So it does have twice the area of $ABC$.
                      – I like Serena
                      yesterday










                    • $BACD$ is not a rhombus.
                      – D. Thomine
                      yesterday










                    • Sorry, I meant parallellogram @D.Thomine.
                      – I like Serena
                      yesterday






                    • 1




                      @Servaes It's too long. "Long comment" is something people often say when their contribution has to be an "answer" because of software limitations, but is far from a complete answer.
                      – J.G.
                      18 hours ago















                    up vote
                    1
                    down vote













                    This is a long comment.



                    The shapes $S,,T$ share a vertex $A$ where six angles meet, three of them right angles. The other three angles therefore sum to a right angle. Let $theta$ be the angle in $T$, so the two other acute angles, and the right angle between them from $S$, sum to $pi-theta$. Since $sintheta=sin(pi-theta)$, $T$ has the same area as $triangle ABC$, where $BA,,AC$ are sides of the upper squares.



                    The challenge, then, is to show $S$ has that much area too. Let $D$ denote the vertex of $S$ opposite $A$. I suspect we can show the quadrilateral $BACD$ has twice the area of $S$, and also twice the area of $triangle ABC$.






                    share|cite|improve this answer





















                    • I don't think that $BACD$ has twice the area of $ABC$. If you try to move $ABC$ by shearing to get a triangle with side $BC$ and something on the bottom line, the third point isn't $D$.
                      – D. Thomine
                      yesterday










                    • $BACD$ is a rhombus because its opposite sides are parallel. So it does have twice the area of $ABC$.
                      – I like Serena
                      yesterday










                    • $BACD$ is not a rhombus.
                      – D. Thomine
                      yesterday










                    • Sorry, I meant parallellogram @D.Thomine.
                      – I like Serena
                      yesterday






                    • 1




                      @Servaes It's too long. "Long comment" is something people often say when their contribution has to be an "answer" because of software limitations, but is far from a complete answer.
                      – J.G.
                      18 hours ago













                    up vote
                    1
                    down vote










                    up vote
                    1
                    down vote









                    This is a long comment.



                    The shapes $S,,T$ share a vertex $A$ where six angles meet, three of them right angles. The other three angles therefore sum to a right angle. Let $theta$ be the angle in $T$, so the two other acute angles, and the right angle between them from $S$, sum to $pi-theta$. Since $sintheta=sin(pi-theta)$, $T$ has the same area as $triangle ABC$, where $BA,,AC$ are sides of the upper squares.



                    The challenge, then, is to show $S$ has that much area too. Let $D$ denote the vertex of $S$ opposite $A$. I suspect we can show the quadrilateral $BACD$ has twice the area of $S$, and also twice the area of $triangle ABC$.






                    share|cite|improve this answer












                    This is a long comment.



                    The shapes $S,,T$ share a vertex $A$ where six angles meet, three of them right angles. The other three angles therefore sum to a right angle. Let $theta$ be the angle in $T$, so the two other acute angles, and the right angle between them from $S$, sum to $pi-theta$. Since $sintheta=sin(pi-theta)$, $T$ has the same area as $triangle ABC$, where $BA,,AC$ are sides of the upper squares.



                    The challenge, then, is to show $S$ has that much area too. Let $D$ denote the vertex of $S$ opposite $A$. I suspect we can show the quadrilateral $BACD$ has twice the area of $S$, and also twice the area of $triangle ABC$.







                    share|cite|improve this answer












                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer










                    answered yesterday









                    J.G.

                    18.6k21932




                    18.6k21932












                    • I don't think that $BACD$ has twice the area of $ABC$. If you try to move $ABC$ by shearing to get a triangle with side $BC$ and something on the bottom line, the third point isn't $D$.
                      – D. Thomine
                      yesterday










                    • $BACD$ is a rhombus because its opposite sides are parallel. So it does have twice the area of $ABC$.
                      – I like Serena
                      yesterday










                    • $BACD$ is not a rhombus.
                      – D. Thomine
                      yesterday










                    • Sorry, I meant parallellogram @D.Thomine.
                      – I like Serena
                      yesterday






                    • 1




                      @Servaes It's too long. "Long comment" is something people often say when their contribution has to be an "answer" because of software limitations, but is far from a complete answer.
                      – J.G.
                      18 hours ago


















                    • I don't think that $BACD$ has twice the area of $ABC$. If you try to move $ABC$ by shearing to get a triangle with side $BC$ and something on the bottom line, the third point isn't $D$.
                      – D. Thomine
                      yesterday










                    • $BACD$ is a rhombus because its opposite sides are parallel. So it does have twice the area of $ABC$.
                      – I like Serena
                      yesterday










                    • $BACD$ is not a rhombus.
                      – D. Thomine
                      yesterday










                    • Sorry, I meant parallellogram @D.Thomine.
                      – I like Serena
                      yesterday






                    • 1




                      @Servaes It's too long. "Long comment" is something people often say when their contribution has to be an "answer" because of software limitations, but is far from a complete answer.
                      – J.G.
                      18 hours ago
















                    I don't think that $BACD$ has twice the area of $ABC$. If you try to move $ABC$ by shearing to get a triangle with side $BC$ and something on the bottom line, the third point isn't $D$.
                    – D. Thomine
                    yesterday




                    I don't think that $BACD$ has twice the area of $ABC$. If you try to move $ABC$ by shearing to get a triangle with side $BC$ and something on the bottom line, the third point isn't $D$.
                    – D. Thomine
                    yesterday












                    $BACD$ is a rhombus because its opposite sides are parallel. So it does have twice the area of $ABC$.
                    – I like Serena
                    yesterday




                    $BACD$ is a rhombus because its opposite sides are parallel. So it does have twice the area of $ABC$.
                    – I like Serena
                    yesterday












                    $BACD$ is not a rhombus.
                    – D. Thomine
                    yesterday




                    $BACD$ is not a rhombus.
                    – D. Thomine
                    yesterday












                    Sorry, I meant parallellogram @D.Thomine.
                    – I like Serena
                    yesterday




                    Sorry, I meant parallellogram @D.Thomine.
                    – I like Serena
                    yesterday




                    1




                    1




                    @Servaes It's too long. "Long comment" is something people often say when their contribution has to be an "answer" because of software limitations, but is far from a complete answer.
                    – J.G.
                    18 hours ago




                    @Servaes It's too long. "Long comment" is something people often say when their contribution has to be an "answer" because of software limitations, but is far from a complete answer.
                    – J.G.
                    18 hours ago


















                     

                    draft saved


                    draft discarded



















































                     


                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3009635%2fjapanese-temple-problem-from-1844%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    How did Captain America manage to do this?

                    迪纳利

                    南乌拉尔铁路局