Why do fusion and fission both release energy?












2












$begingroup$


I only have high school physics knowledge, but here is my understanding:



Fusion: 2 atoms come together to form a new atom. This process releases the energy keeping them apart, and is very energetic. Like the sun!



Fission: Something fast (like an electron) smashes into an atom breaking it apart. Somehow this also releases energy. Less energy than fusion, and it's like a nuclear reactor.



Now my understanding is that the lowest energy state is when everything is tightly stuck together (as per fusion), and it costs energy to break them apart..



So.. why do both fusion and fission release energy?










share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




user230910 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    It is probably a good idea to wait a day or so before accepting an answer. It's not necessarily the case that the first answer will be the best, and the votes from the community can give you a steer in the right direction there.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael MacAskill
    8 mins ago
















2












$begingroup$


I only have high school physics knowledge, but here is my understanding:



Fusion: 2 atoms come together to form a new atom. This process releases the energy keeping them apart, and is very energetic. Like the sun!



Fission: Something fast (like an electron) smashes into an atom breaking it apart. Somehow this also releases energy. Less energy than fusion, and it's like a nuclear reactor.



Now my understanding is that the lowest energy state is when everything is tightly stuck together (as per fusion), and it costs energy to break them apart..



So.. why do both fusion and fission release energy?










share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




user230910 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    It is probably a good idea to wait a day or so before accepting an answer. It's not necessarily the case that the first answer will be the best, and the votes from the community can give you a steer in the right direction there.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael MacAskill
    8 mins ago














2












2








2





$begingroup$


I only have high school physics knowledge, but here is my understanding:



Fusion: 2 atoms come together to form a new atom. This process releases the energy keeping them apart, and is very energetic. Like the sun!



Fission: Something fast (like an electron) smashes into an atom breaking it apart. Somehow this also releases energy. Less energy than fusion, and it's like a nuclear reactor.



Now my understanding is that the lowest energy state is when everything is tightly stuck together (as per fusion), and it costs energy to break them apart..



So.. why do both fusion and fission release energy?










share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




user230910 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$




I only have high school physics knowledge, but here is my understanding:



Fusion: 2 atoms come together to form a new atom. This process releases the energy keeping them apart, and is very energetic. Like the sun!



Fission: Something fast (like an electron) smashes into an atom breaking it apart. Somehow this also releases energy. Less energy than fusion, and it's like a nuclear reactor.



Now my understanding is that the lowest energy state is when everything is tightly stuck together (as per fusion), and it costs energy to break them apart..



So.. why do both fusion and fission release energy?







particle-physics nuclear-physics elements






share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




user230910 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




user230910 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question






New contributor




user230910 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 1 hour ago









user230910user230910

1133




1133




New contributor




user230910 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





user230910 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






user230910 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












  • $begingroup$
    It is probably a good idea to wait a day or so before accepting an answer. It's not necessarily the case that the first answer will be the best, and the votes from the community can give you a steer in the right direction there.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael MacAskill
    8 mins ago


















  • $begingroup$
    It is probably a good idea to wait a day or so before accepting an answer. It's not necessarily the case that the first answer will be the best, and the votes from the community can give you a steer in the right direction there.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael MacAskill
    8 mins ago
















$begingroup$
It is probably a good idea to wait a day or so before accepting an answer. It's not necessarily the case that the first answer will be the best, and the votes from the community can give you a steer in the right direction there.
$endgroup$
– Michael MacAskill
8 mins ago




$begingroup$
It is probably a good idea to wait a day or so before accepting an answer. It's not necessarily the case that the first answer will be the best, and the votes from the community can give you a steer in the right direction there.
$endgroup$
– Michael MacAskill
8 mins ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

Your assumption about the lowest energy state when everything is tightly stuck together is incorrect.



It only goes this way until you get iron nuclei - and this is why iron is the heaviest element created by fusion.



Creating nuclei heavier than iron consumes energy rather than releasing it. And this is why these elements are only created in supernova explosions and other highly energetic events where there is abundant energy input.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    2












    $begingroup$

    Fission releases energy, because a heavy nucleus (like Uranium-235) is like a cocked mouse trap: it took energy to squeeze all those protons and neutrons hard enough together to make them barely stick (by the nuclear force) against the natural tendency for all those protons to fly violently apart because of their electrostatic repulsion. When struck by an incoming neutron, it is like a mouse touching the trigger pedal of the trap: BANG goes the nucleus.



    In the case of fusion, the mechanism is different: the nuclear force between protons and between neutrons is very powerfully attractive but only kicks in when the particles are so close to each other that they are "touching". That attraction is not quite enough to stick two protons together against their electrostatic repulsion but if you add two neutrons to the recipe, you get enough mutually attractive nuclear force to overcome electrostatics and the particles then violently suck themselves together with a very powerful BANG.



    Other fusion reactions in which the (2 protons plus two neutrons) get pressed onto a heavier nucleus (like carbon, nitrogen, oxygen, fluorine, ...) release progressively less energy. By the time you get to iron, further fusion reactions actually consume energy instead of releasing it, because the electrostatic repulsion effect gets bigger and bigger- and you are in the province of fission instead.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$





















      2












      $begingroup$

      Fusion:

      In a small nucleus there is a relatively large fraction of
      nucleons at the surface, which lowers the total binding energy.
      The fusion of 2 very small nuclei to one medium-sized nucleus releases energy,
      mainly because in the resulting bigger nucleus
      there are fewer nucleons at the surface than before.



      Fission:

      In a big nucleus there is much Coulomb repulsion due to the many protons.
      The fission of a very big nucleus into 2 medium-sized nuclei releases energy,
      mainly because the total Coulomb repulsion within the 2 resulting
      nuclei is smaller than before.



      Therefore, medium-sized nuclei (~ 55 nucleons) have the biggest binding energy per nucleon.



      The Bethe-Weizsäcker formula for the binding energy of a nucleus
      gives a more quantitative explanation for this.






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$













        Your Answer





        StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
        return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
        StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
        StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
        });
        });
        }, "mathjax-editing");

        StackExchange.ready(function() {
        var channelOptions = {
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "151"
        };
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
        createEditor();
        });
        }
        else {
        createEditor();
        }
        });

        function createEditor() {
        StackExchange.prepareEditor({
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
        convertImagesToLinks: false,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: null,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader: {
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        },
        noCode: true, onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        });


        }
        });






        user230910 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










        draft saved

        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function () {
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f457686%2fwhy-do-fusion-and-fission-both-release-energy%23new-answer', 'question_page');
        }
        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown

























        3 Answers
        3






        active

        oldest

        votes








        3 Answers
        3






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        2












        $begingroup$

        Your assumption about the lowest energy state when everything is tightly stuck together is incorrect.



        It only goes this way until you get iron nuclei - and this is why iron is the heaviest element created by fusion.



        Creating nuclei heavier than iron consumes energy rather than releasing it. And this is why these elements are only created in supernova explosions and other highly energetic events where there is abundant energy input.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$


















          2












          $begingroup$

          Your assumption about the lowest energy state when everything is tightly stuck together is incorrect.



          It only goes this way until you get iron nuclei - and this is why iron is the heaviest element created by fusion.



          Creating nuclei heavier than iron consumes energy rather than releasing it. And this is why these elements are only created in supernova explosions and other highly energetic events where there is abundant energy input.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$
















            2












            2








            2





            $begingroup$

            Your assumption about the lowest energy state when everything is tightly stuck together is incorrect.



            It only goes this way until you get iron nuclei - and this is why iron is the heaviest element created by fusion.



            Creating nuclei heavier than iron consumes energy rather than releasing it. And this is why these elements are only created in supernova explosions and other highly energetic events where there is abundant energy input.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            Your assumption about the lowest energy state when everything is tightly stuck together is incorrect.



            It only goes this way until you get iron nuclei - and this is why iron is the heaviest element created by fusion.



            Creating nuclei heavier than iron consumes energy rather than releasing it. And this is why these elements are only created in supernova explosions and other highly energetic events where there is abundant energy input.







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered 1 hour ago









            cuckoocuckoo

            1144




            1144























                2












                $begingroup$

                Fission releases energy, because a heavy nucleus (like Uranium-235) is like a cocked mouse trap: it took energy to squeeze all those protons and neutrons hard enough together to make them barely stick (by the nuclear force) against the natural tendency for all those protons to fly violently apart because of their electrostatic repulsion. When struck by an incoming neutron, it is like a mouse touching the trigger pedal of the trap: BANG goes the nucleus.



                In the case of fusion, the mechanism is different: the nuclear force between protons and between neutrons is very powerfully attractive but only kicks in when the particles are so close to each other that they are "touching". That attraction is not quite enough to stick two protons together against their electrostatic repulsion but if you add two neutrons to the recipe, you get enough mutually attractive nuclear force to overcome electrostatics and the particles then violently suck themselves together with a very powerful BANG.



                Other fusion reactions in which the (2 protons plus two neutrons) get pressed onto a heavier nucleus (like carbon, nitrogen, oxygen, fluorine, ...) release progressively less energy. By the time you get to iron, further fusion reactions actually consume energy instead of releasing it, because the electrostatic repulsion effect gets bigger and bigger- and you are in the province of fission instead.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$


















                  2












                  $begingroup$

                  Fission releases energy, because a heavy nucleus (like Uranium-235) is like a cocked mouse trap: it took energy to squeeze all those protons and neutrons hard enough together to make them barely stick (by the nuclear force) against the natural tendency for all those protons to fly violently apart because of their electrostatic repulsion. When struck by an incoming neutron, it is like a mouse touching the trigger pedal of the trap: BANG goes the nucleus.



                  In the case of fusion, the mechanism is different: the nuclear force between protons and between neutrons is very powerfully attractive but only kicks in when the particles are so close to each other that they are "touching". That attraction is not quite enough to stick two protons together against their electrostatic repulsion but if you add two neutrons to the recipe, you get enough mutually attractive nuclear force to overcome electrostatics and the particles then violently suck themselves together with a very powerful BANG.



                  Other fusion reactions in which the (2 protons plus two neutrons) get pressed onto a heavier nucleus (like carbon, nitrogen, oxygen, fluorine, ...) release progressively less energy. By the time you get to iron, further fusion reactions actually consume energy instead of releasing it, because the electrostatic repulsion effect gets bigger and bigger- and you are in the province of fission instead.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$
















                    2












                    2








                    2





                    $begingroup$

                    Fission releases energy, because a heavy nucleus (like Uranium-235) is like a cocked mouse trap: it took energy to squeeze all those protons and neutrons hard enough together to make them barely stick (by the nuclear force) against the natural tendency for all those protons to fly violently apart because of their electrostatic repulsion. When struck by an incoming neutron, it is like a mouse touching the trigger pedal of the trap: BANG goes the nucleus.



                    In the case of fusion, the mechanism is different: the nuclear force between protons and between neutrons is very powerfully attractive but only kicks in when the particles are so close to each other that they are "touching". That attraction is not quite enough to stick two protons together against their electrostatic repulsion but if you add two neutrons to the recipe, you get enough mutually attractive nuclear force to overcome electrostatics and the particles then violently suck themselves together with a very powerful BANG.



                    Other fusion reactions in which the (2 protons plus two neutrons) get pressed onto a heavier nucleus (like carbon, nitrogen, oxygen, fluorine, ...) release progressively less energy. By the time you get to iron, further fusion reactions actually consume energy instead of releasing it, because the electrostatic repulsion effect gets bigger and bigger- and you are in the province of fission instead.






                    share|cite|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$



                    Fission releases energy, because a heavy nucleus (like Uranium-235) is like a cocked mouse trap: it took energy to squeeze all those protons and neutrons hard enough together to make them barely stick (by the nuclear force) against the natural tendency for all those protons to fly violently apart because of their electrostatic repulsion. When struck by an incoming neutron, it is like a mouse touching the trigger pedal of the trap: BANG goes the nucleus.



                    In the case of fusion, the mechanism is different: the nuclear force between protons and between neutrons is very powerfully attractive but only kicks in when the particles are so close to each other that they are "touching". That attraction is not quite enough to stick two protons together against their electrostatic repulsion but if you add two neutrons to the recipe, you get enough mutually attractive nuclear force to overcome electrostatics and the particles then violently suck themselves together with a very powerful BANG.



                    Other fusion reactions in which the (2 protons plus two neutrons) get pressed onto a heavier nucleus (like carbon, nitrogen, oxygen, fluorine, ...) release progressively less energy. By the time you get to iron, further fusion reactions actually consume energy instead of releasing it, because the electrostatic repulsion effect gets bigger and bigger- and you are in the province of fission instead.







                    share|cite|improve this answer












                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer










                    answered 59 mins ago









                    niels nielsenniels nielsen

                    17.9k42757




                    17.9k42757























                        2












                        $begingroup$

                        Fusion:

                        In a small nucleus there is a relatively large fraction of
                        nucleons at the surface, which lowers the total binding energy.
                        The fusion of 2 very small nuclei to one medium-sized nucleus releases energy,
                        mainly because in the resulting bigger nucleus
                        there are fewer nucleons at the surface than before.



                        Fission:

                        In a big nucleus there is much Coulomb repulsion due to the many protons.
                        The fission of a very big nucleus into 2 medium-sized nuclei releases energy,
                        mainly because the total Coulomb repulsion within the 2 resulting
                        nuclei is smaller than before.



                        Therefore, medium-sized nuclei (~ 55 nucleons) have the biggest binding energy per nucleon.



                        The Bethe-Weizsäcker formula for the binding energy of a nucleus
                        gives a more quantitative explanation for this.






                        share|cite|improve this answer











                        $endgroup$


















                          2












                          $begingroup$

                          Fusion:

                          In a small nucleus there is a relatively large fraction of
                          nucleons at the surface, which lowers the total binding energy.
                          The fusion of 2 very small nuclei to one medium-sized nucleus releases energy,
                          mainly because in the resulting bigger nucleus
                          there are fewer nucleons at the surface than before.



                          Fission:

                          In a big nucleus there is much Coulomb repulsion due to the many protons.
                          The fission of a very big nucleus into 2 medium-sized nuclei releases energy,
                          mainly because the total Coulomb repulsion within the 2 resulting
                          nuclei is smaller than before.



                          Therefore, medium-sized nuclei (~ 55 nucleons) have the biggest binding energy per nucleon.



                          The Bethe-Weizsäcker formula for the binding energy of a nucleus
                          gives a more quantitative explanation for this.






                          share|cite|improve this answer











                          $endgroup$
















                            2












                            2








                            2





                            $begingroup$

                            Fusion:

                            In a small nucleus there is a relatively large fraction of
                            nucleons at the surface, which lowers the total binding energy.
                            The fusion of 2 very small nuclei to one medium-sized nucleus releases energy,
                            mainly because in the resulting bigger nucleus
                            there are fewer nucleons at the surface than before.



                            Fission:

                            In a big nucleus there is much Coulomb repulsion due to the many protons.
                            The fission of a very big nucleus into 2 medium-sized nuclei releases energy,
                            mainly because the total Coulomb repulsion within the 2 resulting
                            nuclei is smaller than before.



                            Therefore, medium-sized nuclei (~ 55 nucleons) have the biggest binding energy per nucleon.



                            The Bethe-Weizsäcker formula for the binding energy of a nucleus
                            gives a more quantitative explanation for this.






                            share|cite|improve this answer











                            $endgroup$



                            Fusion:

                            In a small nucleus there is a relatively large fraction of
                            nucleons at the surface, which lowers the total binding energy.
                            The fusion of 2 very small nuclei to one medium-sized nucleus releases energy,
                            mainly because in the resulting bigger nucleus
                            there are fewer nucleons at the surface than before.



                            Fission:

                            In a big nucleus there is much Coulomb repulsion due to the many protons.
                            The fission of a very big nucleus into 2 medium-sized nuclei releases energy,
                            mainly because the total Coulomb repulsion within the 2 resulting
                            nuclei is smaller than before.



                            Therefore, medium-sized nuclei (~ 55 nucleons) have the biggest binding energy per nucleon.



                            The Bethe-Weizsäcker formula for the binding energy of a nucleus
                            gives a more quantitative explanation for this.







                            share|cite|improve this answer














                            share|cite|improve this answer



                            share|cite|improve this answer








                            edited 25 mins ago

























                            answered 43 mins ago









                            Thomas FritschThomas Fritsch

                            36929




                            36929






















                                user230910 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










                                draft saved

                                draft discarded


















                                user230910 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













                                user230910 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                                user230910 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















                                Thanks for contributing an answer to Physics Stack Exchange!


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid



                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function () {
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f457686%2fwhy-do-fusion-and-fission-both-release-energy%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                }
                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown







                                Popular posts from this blog

                                迪纳利

                                How did Captain America manage to do this?

                                南乌拉尔铁路局