Quoting Keynes in a lecture












25















I am teaching mathematical statistics and part of this is large sample theory. I would like to discuss some methods that do not focus on asymptotics and refer to J. M. Keynes quote




In the long run, we are all dead.




I am a bit afraid some students might find this quote a bit too strong.
Could this quote be considered a bit too strong to be presented to 3rd year undergraduate students in the UK?










share|improve this question







New contributor




TSE is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 50





    If you use the quote, in the long run you should be okay...

    – Dan Romik
    yesterday






  • 13





    @emory Yeah... Keynes's version was better.

    – David Richerby
    13 hours ago






  • 12





    Could you elaborate a bit more for those of us who don't understand why this saying this might be a problem at all?

    – Szabolcs
    12 hours ago






  • 12





    A bit of cultural difference perhaps, but why is this even a question? They are adults.

    – rath
    7 hours ago






  • 3





    3rd year undergraduate!? When will they be ready for it, when they are post-docs? Are you ready for it, yet, OP? :)

    – Stumbler
    4 hours ago
















25















I am teaching mathematical statistics and part of this is large sample theory. I would like to discuss some methods that do not focus on asymptotics and refer to J. M. Keynes quote




In the long run, we are all dead.




I am a bit afraid some students might find this quote a bit too strong.
Could this quote be considered a bit too strong to be presented to 3rd year undergraduate students in the UK?










share|improve this question







New contributor




TSE is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 50





    If you use the quote, in the long run you should be okay...

    – Dan Romik
    yesterday






  • 13





    @emory Yeah... Keynes's version was better.

    – David Richerby
    13 hours ago






  • 12





    Could you elaborate a bit more for those of us who don't understand why this saying this might be a problem at all?

    – Szabolcs
    12 hours ago






  • 12





    A bit of cultural difference perhaps, but why is this even a question? They are adults.

    – rath
    7 hours ago






  • 3





    3rd year undergraduate!? When will they be ready for it, when they are post-docs? Are you ready for it, yet, OP? :)

    – Stumbler
    4 hours ago














25












25








25


3






I am teaching mathematical statistics and part of this is large sample theory. I would like to discuss some methods that do not focus on asymptotics and refer to J. M. Keynes quote




In the long run, we are all dead.




I am a bit afraid some students might find this quote a bit too strong.
Could this quote be considered a bit too strong to be presented to 3rd year undergraduate students in the UK?










share|improve this question







New contributor




TSE is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












I am teaching mathematical statistics and part of this is large sample theory. I would like to discuss some methods that do not focus on asymptotics and refer to J. M. Keynes quote




In the long run, we are all dead.




I am a bit afraid some students might find this quote a bit too strong.
Could this quote be considered a bit too strong to be presented to 3rd year undergraduate students in the UK?







teaching lecture-teaching-method quotation






share|improve this question







New contributor




TSE is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question







New contributor




TSE is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question






New contributor




TSE is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked yesterday









TSETSE

13124




13124




New contributor




TSE is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





TSE is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






TSE is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








  • 50





    If you use the quote, in the long run you should be okay...

    – Dan Romik
    yesterday






  • 13





    @emory Yeah... Keynes's version was better.

    – David Richerby
    13 hours ago






  • 12





    Could you elaborate a bit more for those of us who don't understand why this saying this might be a problem at all?

    – Szabolcs
    12 hours ago






  • 12





    A bit of cultural difference perhaps, but why is this even a question? They are adults.

    – rath
    7 hours ago






  • 3





    3rd year undergraduate!? When will they be ready for it, when they are post-docs? Are you ready for it, yet, OP? :)

    – Stumbler
    4 hours ago














  • 50





    If you use the quote, in the long run you should be okay...

    – Dan Romik
    yesterday






  • 13





    @emory Yeah... Keynes's version was better.

    – David Richerby
    13 hours ago






  • 12





    Could you elaborate a bit more for those of us who don't understand why this saying this might be a problem at all?

    – Szabolcs
    12 hours ago






  • 12





    A bit of cultural difference perhaps, but why is this even a question? They are adults.

    – rath
    7 hours ago






  • 3





    3rd year undergraduate!? When will they be ready for it, when they are post-docs? Are you ready for it, yet, OP? :)

    – Stumbler
    4 hours ago








50




50





If you use the quote, in the long run you should be okay...

– Dan Romik
yesterday





If you use the quote, in the long run you should be okay...

– Dan Romik
yesterday




13




13





@emory Yeah... Keynes's version was better.

– David Richerby
13 hours ago





@emory Yeah... Keynes's version was better.

– David Richerby
13 hours ago




12




12





Could you elaborate a bit more for those of us who don't understand why this saying this might be a problem at all?

– Szabolcs
12 hours ago





Could you elaborate a bit more for those of us who don't understand why this saying this might be a problem at all?

– Szabolcs
12 hours ago




12




12





A bit of cultural difference perhaps, but why is this even a question? They are adults.

– rath
7 hours ago





A bit of cultural difference perhaps, but why is this even a question? They are adults.

– rath
7 hours ago




3




3





3rd year undergraduate!? When will they be ready for it, when they are post-docs? Are you ready for it, yet, OP? :)

– Stumbler
4 hours ago





3rd year undergraduate!? When will they be ready for it, when they are post-docs? Are you ready for it, yet, OP? :)

– Stumbler
4 hours ago










6 Answers
6






active

oldest

votes


















64














Opinion, of course, but I think it is fine. It is often quoted in fact. While your students probably still think of themselves as immortal, they almost certainly aren't. No one should really take offense at basic biological certainties.



It is, in fact, a corrective on much illogical thinking, which is why it has lasted.






share|improve this answer



















  • 16





    "While your students probably still think of themselves as immortal, they almost certainly aren't." I confess, I laughed out loud at this statement.

    – Akshat Mahajan
    yesterday








  • 1





    Every time I hear Keynes' "In the long run we're all dead" it seems to be justifying some short-sighted thinking. In the long-run, there's future you, and you may well have a family, and you certainly have a community, and you will one day leave a legacy - that statement reveals a lack of regard for those things.

    – Aaron Hall
    8 hours ago






  • 1





    @AaronHall while that is true, there is no point in only focusing on the far future and forgetting the here and now, which is the point of the quote. I think that it should not be seen as advocating unbounded hedonism, hence the curt and dry wording. But, yes, it tends to be misused a bit.

    – Chieron
    7 hours ago






  • 1





    I always hear jokes about young adults thinking they're immortal, but when I was a young adult, I didn't know anone who actually thought this... do adults not remember being young? Of course young people know they're going to die, they just don't think about it often. Healthy adults don't either... It wouldn't be "shocking" to anyone to mention death.

    – only_pro
    7 hours ago








  • 2





    @only_pro Nobody thinks that young adults sit around declaring to one another "We are immortal!" When people say that young adults believe themselves to be immortal, they mean that young adults often behave rather recklessly, without really considering the consequences of their actions, as if they were immortal and those consequences don't exist.

    – David Richerby
    6 hours ago



















47














As a British person, I don't understand why you'd even consider that this quote might be inappropriate. If you feel that it's a good way to get your message across, there's no reason not to use it. However, if you're uncomfortable with it, for whatever reason, don't use it.






share|improve this answer



















  • 1





    Perhaps OP is worried about triggering the students?

    – The Dude
    6 hours ago



















25














Writers often talk about the need to "kill your darlings". This refers to the fact that it's often easy to become enamored with one's own clever ideas and turns of phrase, whether or not they actually accomplish what is needed in the larger context.



Following this advice, I would suggest preparing the lecture without the phrase, simply to see how useful it really is. Come back to it a couple of days later, when you've had time enough to detach a bit, and see how well the lecture works. If the phrase is actually helpful and meaningful (as opposed to merely attention-grabbing), you can always add it back in then.






share|improve this answer



















  • 14





    I would add that doses of "merely attention grabbing" stunts can be an important ingredient in lectures even if the attention grabbing isn't directly related to the material. (In this case the joke directly relates to the tools of the trade though.)

    – user2705196
    yesterday











  • The advice to kill one’s darling is a bit strong, don’t you think?

    – Konrad Rudolph
    2 hours ago



















9














Your students are not children. They are about twenty years old. If they have not yet accepted the idea of death, it's their problem, not yours. You are being paternalistic from trying to shield them from something so mundane.






share|improve this answer








New contributor




user105844 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




























    4














    Not in the UK, but I was in my 3rd year of college when I took an economics course that used that quote and that was the least of my concerns about that particular course. Of course, I feel like you'd be doing your students a bit of disservice if you don't provide a least a little of the context (which since you mention statistic / asymptotics I'm assuming you're aware of). What I remember is that the context was someone pointing out that following Keynesian economics, in the long run, you'll just have inflation and that was Keynes' reply to that critique. (To which I can envision another professor pointing out "and that's why Keynes was so often invited to all the parties")






    share|improve this answer








    New contributor




    Foon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.
















    • 1





      No, the context is even simpler. A larger quote helps: "The long run is a misleading guide to current affairs. In the long run we are all dead. Economists set themselves too easy, too useless a task if in tempestuous seasons they can only tell us that when the storm is past the ocean is flat again.". He was merely arguing for interventionist policies, against the classical economic position that interventions do more harm than good (and that waiting for the ocean to calm down is better than trying to force it to calm down; curious Keynes would use an example where we don't try to fight :)).

      – Luaan
      10 hours ago











    • To Keynes, inflation wasn't even a consequence - it was a tool of his interventionist policies. For example, as a way to reduce the real earnings of people who aren't worth their real wages, without lowering the nominal wages or having them fired. He also stipulated that spending should be encouraged, while investment should be discouraged - if money loses value over time (monetary inflation), people are more likely to spend their income on consumption goods than, say, saving up for their retirement.

      – Luaan
      10 hours ago





















    3














    I have previously taught a similar course in the UK and would use a quote like this without concern. In my experience UG students are totally unconcerned about their eventual demise.



    However, the point of including such aphorisms is that they allow you, the lecturer, to convey something with a bit more interest/ passion / excitement, your students probably won’t get much out of them directly. Thus, if you are uncomfortable about this quote then it isn’t going to serve its purpose and you should drop it.






    share|improve this answer























      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "415"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });






      TSE is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f126760%2fquoting-keynes-in-a-lecture%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      6 Answers
      6






      active

      oldest

      votes








      6 Answers
      6






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      64














      Opinion, of course, but I think it is fine. It is often quoted in fact. While your students probably still think of themselves as immortal, they almost certainly aren't. No one should really take offense at basic biological certainties.



      It is, in fact, a corrective on much illogical thinking, which is why it has lasted.






      share|improve this answer



















      • 16





        "While your students probably still think of themselves as immortal, they almost certainly aren't." I confess, I laughed out loud at this statement.

        – Akshat Mahajan
        yesterday








      • 1





        Every time I hear Keynes' "In the long run we're all dead" it seems to be justifying some short-sighted thinking. In the long-run, there's future you, and you may well have a family, and you certainly have a community, and you will one day leave a legacy - that statement reveals a lack of regard for those things.

        – Aaron Hall
        8 hours ago






      • 1





        @AaronHall while that is true, there is no point in only focusing on the far future and forgetting the here and now, which is the point of the quote. I think that it should not be seen as advocating unbounded hedonism, hence the curt and dry wording. But, yes, it tends to be misused a bit.

        – Chieron
        7 hours ago






      • 1





        I always hear jokes about young adults thinking they're immortal, but when I was a young adult, I didn't know anone who actually thought this... do adults not remember being young? Of course young people know they're going to die, they just don't think about it often. Healthy adults don't either... It wouldn't be "shocking" to anyone to mention death.

        – only_pro
        7 hours ago








      • 2





        @only_pro Nobody thinks that young adults sit around declaring to one another "We are immortal!" When people say that young adults believe themselves to be immortal, they mean that young adults often behave rather recklessly, without really considering the consequences of their actions, as if they were immortal and those consequences don't exist.

        – David Richerby
        6 hours ago
















      64














      Opinion, of course, but I think it is fine. It is often quoted in fact. While your students probably still think of themselves as immortal, they almost certainly aren't. No one should really take offense at basic biological certainties.



      It is, in fact, a corrective on much illogical thinking, which is why it has lasted.






      share|improve this answer



















      • 16





        "While your students probably still think of themselves as immortal, they almost certainly aren't." I confess, I laughed out loud at this statement.

        – Akshat Mahajan
        yesterday








      • 1





        Every time I hear Keynes' "In the long run we're all dead" it seems to be justifying some short-sighted thinking. In the long-run, there's future you, and you may well have a family, and you certainly have a community, and you will one day leave a legacy - that statement reveals a lack of regard for those things.

        – Aaron Hall
        8 hours ago






      • 1





        @AaronHall while that is true, there is no point in only focusing on the far future and forgetting the here and now, which is the point of the quote. I think that it should not be seen as advocating unbounded hedonism, hence the curt and dry wording. But, yes, it tends to be misused a bit.

        – Chieron
        7 hours ago






      • 1





        I always hear jokes about young adults thinking they're immortal, but when I was a young adult, I didn't know anone who actually thought this... do adults not remember being young? Of course young people know they're going to die, they just don't think about it often. Healthy adults don't either... It wouldn't be "shocking" to anyone to mention death.

        – only_pro
        7 hours ago








      • 2





        @only_pro Nobody thinks that young adults sit around declaring to one another "We are immortal!" When people say that young adults believe themselves to be immortal, they mean that young adults often behave rather recklessly, without really considering the consequences of their actions, as if they were immortal and those consequences don't exist.

        – David Richerby
        6 hours ago














      64












      64








      64







      Opinion, of course, but I think it is fine. It is often quoted in fact. While your students probably still think of themselves as immortal, they almost certainly aren't. No one should really take offense at basic biological certainties.



      It is, in fact, a corrective on much illogical thinking, which is why it has lasted.






      share|improve this answer













      Opinion, of course, but I think it is fine. It is often quoted in fact. While your students probably still think of themselves as immortal, they almost certainly aren't. No one should really take offense at basic biological certainties.



      It is, in fact, a corrective on much illogical thinking, which is why it has lasted.







      share|improve this answer












      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer










      answered yesterday









      BuffyBuffy

      53.8k16175268




      53.8k16175268








      • 16





        "While your students probably still think of themselves as immortal, they almost certainly aren't." I confess, I laughed out loud at this statement.

        – Akshat Mahajan
        yesterday








      • 1





        Every time I hear Keynes' "In the long run we're all dead" it seems to be justifying some short-sighted thinking. In the long-run, there's future you, and you may well have a family, and you certainly have a community, and you will one day leave a legacy - that statement reveals a lack of regard for those things.

        – Aaron Hall
        8 hours ago






      • 1





        @AaronHall while that is true, there is no point in only focusing on the far future and forgetting the here and now, which is the point of the quote. I think that it should not be seen as advocating unbounded hedonism, hence the curt and dry wording. But, yes, it tends to be misused a bit.

        – Chieron
        7 hours ago






      • 1





        I always hear jokes about young adults thinking they're immortal, but when I was a young adult, I didn't know anone who actually thought this... do adults not remember being young? Of course young people know they're going to die, they just don't think about it often. Healthy adults don't either... It wouldn't be "shocking" to anyone to mention death.

        – only_pro
        7 hours ago








      • 2





        @only_pro Nobody thinks that young adults sit around declaring to one another "We are immortal!" When people say that young adults believe themselves to be immortal, they mean that young adults often behave rather recklessly, without really considering the consequences of their actions, as if they were immortal and those consequences don't exist.

        – David Richerby
        6 hours ago














      • 16





        "While your students probably still think of themselves as immortal, they almost certainly aren't." I confess, I laughed out loud at this statement.

        – Akshat Mahajan
        yesterday








      • 1





        Every time I hear Keynes' "In the long run we're all dead" it seems to be justifying some short-sighted thinking. In the long-run, there's future you, and you may well have a family, and you certainly have a community, and you will one day leave a legacy - that statement reveals a lack of regard for those things.

        – Aaron Hall
        8 hours ago






      • 1





        @AaronHall while that is true, there is no point in only focusing on the far future and forgetting the here and now, which is the point of the quote. I think that it should not be seen as advocating unbounded hedonism, hence the curt and dry wording. But, yes, it tends to be misused a bit.

        – Chieron
        7 hours ago






      • 1





        I always hear jokes about young adults thinking they're immortal, but when I was a young adult, I didn't know anone who actually thought this... do adults not remember being young? Of course young people know they're going to die, they just don't think about it often. Healthy adults don't either... It wouldn't be "shocking" to anyone to mention death.

        – only_pro
        7 hours ago








      • 2





        @only_pro Nobody thinks that young adults sit around declaring to one another "We are immortal!" When people say that young adults believe themselves to be immortal, they mean that young adults often behave rather recklessly, without really considering the consequences of their actions, as if they were immortal and those consequences don't exist.

        – David Richerby
        6 hours ago








      16




      16





      "While your students probably still think of themselves as immortal, they almost certainly aren't." I confess, I laughed out loud at this statement.

      – Akshat Mahajan
      yesterday







      "While your students probably still think of themselves as immortal, they almost certainly aren't." I confess, I laughed out loud at this statement.

      – Akshat Mahajan
      yesterday






      1




      1





      Every time I hear Keynes' "In the long run we're all dead" it seems to be justifying some short-sighted thinking. In the long-run, there's future you, and you may well have a family, and you certainly have a community, and you will one day leave a legacy - that statement reveals a lack of regard for those things.

      – Aaron Hall
      8 hours ago





      Every time I hear Keynes' "In the long run we're all dead" it seems to be justifying some short-sighted thinking. In the long-run, there's future you, and you may well have a family, and you certainly have a community, and you will one day leave a legacy - that statement reveals a lack of regard for those things.

      – Aaron Hall
      8 hours ago




      1




      1





      @AaronHall while that is true, there is no point in only focusing on the far future and forgetting the here and now, which is the point of the quote. I think that it should not be seen as advocating unbounded hedonism, hence the curt and dry wording. But, yes, it tends to be misused a bit.

      – Chieron
      7 hours ago





      @AaronHall while that is true, there is no point in only focusing on the far future and forgetting the here and now, which is the point of the quote. I think that it should not be seen as advocating unbounded hedonism, hence the curt and dry wording. But, yes, it tends to be misused a bit.

      – Chieron
      7 hours ago




      1




      1





      I always hear jokes about young adults thinking they're immortal, but when I was a young adult, I didn't know anone who actually thought this... do adults not remember being young? Of course young people know they're going to die, they just don't think about it often. Healthy adults don't either... It wouldn't be "shocking" to anyone to mention death.

      – only_pro
      7 hours ago







      I always hear jokes about young adults thinking they're immortal, but when I was a young adult, I didn't know anone who actually thought this... do adults not remember being young? Of course young people know they're going to die, they just don't think about it often. Healthy adults don't either... It wouldn't be "shocking" to anyone to mention death.

      – only_pro
      7 hours ago






      2




      2





      @only_pro Nobody thinks that young adults sit around declaring to one another "We are immortal!" When people say that young adults believe themselves to be immortal, they mean that young adults often behave rather recklessly, without really considering the consequences of their actions, as if they were immortal and those consequences don't exist.

      – David Richerby
      6 hours ago





      @only_pro Nobody thinks that young adults sit around declaring to one another "We are immortal!" When people say that young adults believe themselves to be immortal, they mean that young adults often behave rather recklessly, without really considering the consequences of their actions, as if they were immortal and those consequences don't exist.

      – David Richerby
      6 hours ago











      47














      As a British person, I don't understand why you'd even consider that this quote might be inappropriate. If you feel that it's a good way to get your message across, there's no reason not to use it. However, if you're uncomfortable with it, for whatever reason, don't use it.






      share|improve this answer



















      • 1





        Perhaps OP is worried about triggering the students?

        – The Dude
        6 hours ago
















      47














      As a British person, I don't understand why you'd even consider that this quote might be inappropriate. If you feel that it's a good way to get your message across, there's no reason not to use it. However, if you're uncomfortable with it, for whatever reason, don't use it.






      share|improve this answer



















      • 1





        Perhaps OP is worried about triggering the students?

        – The Dude
        6 hours ago














      47












      47








      47







      As a British person, I don't understand why you'd even consider that this quote might be inappropriate. If you feel that it's a good way to get your message across, there's no reason not to use it. However, if you're uncomfortable with it, for whatever reason, don't use it.






      share|improve this answer













      As a British person, I don't understand why you'd even consider that this quote might be inappropriate. If you feel that it's a good way to get your message across, there's no reason not to use it. However, if you're uncomfortable with it, for whatever reason, don't use it.







      share|improve this answer












      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer










      answered yesterday









      David RicherbyDavid Richerby

      30.2k662126




      30.2k662126








      • 1





        Perhaps OP is worried about triggering the students?

        – The Dude
        6 hours ago














      • 1





        Perhaps OP is worried about triggering the students?

        – The Dude
        6 hours ago








      1




      1





      Perhaps OP is worried about triggering the students?

      – The Dude
      6 hours ago





      Perhaps OP is worried about triggering the students?

      – The Dude
      6 hours ago











      25














      Writers often talk about the need to "kill your darlings". This refers to the fact that it's often easy to become enamored with one's own clever ideas and turns of phrase, whether or not they actually accomplish what is needed in the larger context.



      Following this advice, I would suggest preparing the lecture without the phrase, simply to see how useful it really is. Come back to it a couple of days later, when you've had time enough to detach a bit, and see how well the lecture works. If the phrase is actually helpful and meaningful (as opposed to merely attention-grabbing), you can always add it back in then.






      share|improve this answer



















      • 14





        I would add that doses of "merely attention grabbing" stunts can be an important ingredient in lectures even if the attention grabbing isn't directly related to the material. (In this case the joke directly relates to the tools of the trade though.)

        – user2705196
        yesterday











      • The advice to kill one’s darling is a bit strong, don’t you think?

        – Konrad Rudolph
        2 hours ago
















      25














      Writers often talk about the need to "kill your darlings". This refers to the fact that it's often easy to become enamored with one's own clever ideas and turns of phrase, whether or not they actually accomplish what is needed in the larger context.



      Following this advice, I would suggest preparing the lecture without the phrase, simply to see how useful it really is. Come back to it a couple of days later, when you've had time enough to detach a bit, and see how well the lecture works. If the phrase is actually helpful and meaningful (as opposed to merely attention-grabbing), you can always add it back in then.






      share|improve this answer



















      • 14





        I would add that doses of "merely attention grabbing" stunts can be an important ingredient in lectures even if the attention grabbing isn't directly related to the material. (In this case the joke directly relates to the tools of the trade though.)

        – user2705196
        yesterday











      • The advice to kill one’s darling is a bit strong, don’t you think?

        – Konrad Rudolph
        2 hours ago














      25












      25








      25







      Writers often talk about the need to "kill your darlings". This refers to the fact that it's often easy to become enamored with one's own clever ideas and turns of phrase, whether or not they actually accomplish what is needed in the larger context.



      Following this advice, I would suggest preparing the lecture without the phrase, simply to see how useful it really is. Come back to it a couple of days later, when you've had time enough to detach a bit, and see how well the lecture works. If the phrase is actually helpful and meaningful (as opposed to merely attention-grabbing), you can always add it back in then.






      share|improve this answer













      Writers often talk about the need to "kill your darlings". This refers to the fact that it's often easy to become enamored with one's own clever ideas and turns of phrase, whether or not they actually accomplish what is needed in the larger context.



      Following this advice, I would suggest preparing the lecture without the phrase, simply to see how useful it really is. Come back to it a couple of days later, when you've had time enough to detach a bit, and see how well the lecture works. If the phrase is actually helpful and meaningful (as opposed to merely attention-grabbing), you can always add it back in then.







      share|improve this answer












      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer










      answered yesterday









      jakebealjakebeal

      148k31533776




      148k31533776








      • 14





        I would add that doses of "merely attention grabbing" stunts can be an important ingredient in lectures even if the attention grabbing isn't directly related to the material. (In this case the joke directly relates to the tools of the trade though.)

        – user2705196
        yesterday











      • The advice to kill one’s darling is a bit strong, don’t you think?

        – Konrad Rudolph
        2 hours ago














      • 14





        I would add that doses of "merely attention grabbing" stunts can be an important ingredient in lectures even if the attention grabbing isn't directly related to the material. (In this case the joke directly relates to the tools of the trade though.)

        – user2705196
        yesterday











      • The advice to kill one’s darling is a bit strong, don’t you think?

        – Konrad Rudolph
        2 hours ago








      14




      14





      I would add that doses of "merely attention grabbing" stunts can be an important ingredient in lectures even if the attention grabbing isn't directly related to the material. (In this case the joke directly relates to the tools of the trade though.)

      – user2705196
      yesterday





      I would add that doses of "merely attention grabbing" stunts can be an important ingredient in lectures even if the attention grabbing isn't directly related to the material. (In this case the joke directly relates to the tools of the trade though.)

      – user2705196
      yesterday













      The advice to kill one’s darling is a bit strong, don’t you think?

      – Konrad Rudolph
      2 hours ago





      The advice to kill one’s darling is a bit strong, don’t you think?

      – Konrad Rudolph
      2 hours ago











      9














      Your students are not children. They are about twenty years old. If they have not yet accepted the idea of death, it's their problem, not yours. You are being paternalistic from trying to shield them from something so mundane.






      share|improve this answer








      New contributor




      user105844 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.

























        9














        Your students are not children. They are about twenty years old. If they have not yet accepted the idea of death, it's their problem, not yours. You are being paternalistic from trying to shield them from something so mundane.






        share|improve this answer








        New contributor




        user105844 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.























          9












          9








          9







          Your students are not children. They are about twenty years old. If they have not yet accepted the idea of death, it's their problem, not yours. You are being paternalistic from trying to shield them from something so mundane.






          share|improve this answer








          New contributor




          user105844 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.










          Your students are not children. They are about twenty years old. If they have not yet accepted the idea of death, it's their problem, not yours. You are being paternalistic from trying to shield them from something so mundane.







          share|improve this answer








          New contributor




          user105844 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.









          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer






          New contributor




          user105844 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.









          answered 15 hours ago









          user105844user105844

          911




          911




          New contributor




          user105844 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.





          New contributor





          user105844 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.






          user105844 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.























              4














              Not in the UK, but I was in my 3rd year of college when I took an economics course that used that quote and that was the least of my concerns about that particular course. Of course, I feel like you'd be doing your students a bit of disservice if you don't provide a least a little of the context (which since you mention statistic / asymptotics I'm assuming you're aware of). What I remember is that the context was someone pointing out that following Keynesian economics, in the long run, you'll just have inflation and that was Keynes' reply to that critique. (To which I can envision another professor pointing out "and that's why Keynes was so often invited to all the parties")






              share|improve this answer








              New contributor




              Foon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.
















              • 1





                No, the context is even simpler. A larger quote helps: "The long run is a misleading guide to current affairs. In the long run we are all dead. Economists set themselves too easy, too useless a task if in tempestuous seasons they can only tell us that when the storm is past the ocean is flat again.". He was merely arguing for interventionist policies, against the classical economic position that interventions do more harm than good (and that waiting for the ocean to calm down is better than trying to force it to calm down; curious Keynes would use an example where we don't try to fight :)).

                – Luaan
                10 hours ago











              • To Keynes, inflation wasn't even a consequence - it was a tool of his interventionist policies. For example, as a way to reduce the real earnings of people who aren't worth their real wages, without lowering the nominal wages or having them fired. He also stipulated that spending should be encouraged, while investment should be discouraged - if money loses value over time (monetary inflation), people are more likely to spend their income on consumption goods than, say, saving up for their retirement.

                – Luaan
                10 hours ago


















              4














              Not in the UK, but I was in my 3rd year of college when I took an economics course that used that quote and that was the least of my concerns about that particular course. Of course, I feel like you'd be doing your students a bit of disservice if you don't provide a least a little of the context (which since you mention statistic / asymptotics I'm assuming you're aware of). What I remember is that the context was someone pointing out that following Keynesian economics, in the long run, you'll just have inflation and that was Keynes' reply to that critique. (To which I can envision another professor pointing out "and that's why Keynes was so often invited to all the parties")






              share|improve this answer








              New contributor




              Foon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.
















              • 1





                No, the context is even simpler. A larger quote helps: "The long run is a misleading guide to current affairs. In the long run we are all dead. Economists set themselves too easy, too useless a task if in tempestuous seasons they can only tell us that when the storm is past the ocean is flat again.". He was merely arguing for interventionist policies, against the classical economic position that interventions do more harm than good (and that waiting for the ocean to calm down is better than trying to force it to calm down; curious Keynes would use an example where we don't try to fight :)).

                – Luaan
                10 hours ago











              • To Keynes, inflation wasn't even a consequence - it was a tool of his interventionist policies. For example, as a way to reduce the real earnings of people who aren't worth their real wages, without lowering the nominal wages or having them fired. He also stipulated that spending should be encouraged, while investment should be discouraged - if money loses value over time (monetary inflation), people are more likely to spend their income on consumption goods than, say, saving up for their retirement.

                – Luaan
                10 hours ago
















              4












              4








              4







              Not in the UK, but I was in my 3rd year of college when I took an economics course that used that quote and that was the least of my concerns about that particular course. Of course, I feel like you'd be doing your students a bit of disservice if you don't provide a least a little of the context (which since you mention statistic / asymptotics I'm assuming you're aware of). What I remember is that the context was someone pointing out that following Keynesian economics, in the long run, you'll just have inflation and that was Keynes' reply to that critique. (To which I can envision another professor pointing out "and that's why Keynes was so often invited to all the parties")






              share|improve this answer








              New contributor




              Foon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.










              Not in the UK, but I was in my 3rd year of college when I took an economics course that used that quote and that was the least of my concerns about that particular course. Of course, I feel like you'd be doing your students a bit of disservice if you don't provide a least a little of the context (which since you mention statistic / asymptotics I'm assuming you're aware of). What I remember is that the context was someone pointing out that following Keynesian economics, in the long run, you'll just have inflation and that was Keynes' reply to that critique. (To which I can envision another professor pointing out "and that's why Keynes was so often invited to all the parties")







              share|improve this answer








              New contributor




              Foon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.









              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer






              New contributor




              Foon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.









              answered yesterday









              FoonFoon

              1412




              1412




              New contributor




              Foon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.





              New contributor





              Foon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.






              Foon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.








              • 1





                No, the context is even simpler. A larger quote helps: "The long run is a misleading guide to current affairs. In the long run we are all dead. Economists set themselves too easy, too useless a task if in tempestuous seasons they can only tell us that when the storm is past the ocean is flat again.". He was merely arguing for interventionist policies, against the classical economic position that interventions do more harm than good (and that waiting for the ocean to calm down is better than trying to force it to calm down; curious Keynes would use an example where we don't try to fight :)).

                – Luaan
                10 hours ago











              • To Keynes, inflation wasn't even a consequence - it was a tool of his interventionist policies. For example, as a way to reduce the real earnings of people who aren't worth their real wages, without lowering the nominal wages or having them fired. He also stipulated that spending should be encouraged, while investment should be discouraged - if money loses value over time (monetary inflation), people are more likely to spend their income on consumption goods than, say, saving up for their retirement.

                – Luaan
                10 hours ago
















              • 1





                No, the context is even simpler. A larger quote helps: "The long run is a misleading guide to current affairs. In the long run we are all dead. Economists set themselves too easy, too useless a task if in tempestuous seasons they can only tell us that when the storm is past the ocean is flat again.". He was merely arguing for interventionist policies, against the classical economic position that interventions do more harm than good (and that waiting for the ocean to calm down is better than trying to force it to calm down; curious Keynes would use an example where we don't try to fight :)).

                – Luaan
                10 hours ago











              • To Keynes, inflation wasn't even a consequence - it was a tool of his interventionist policies. For example, as a way to reduce the real earnings of people who aren't worth their real wages, without lowering the nominal wages or having them fired. He also stipulated that spending should be encouraged, while investment should be discouraged - if money loses value over time (monetary inflation), people are more likely to spend their income on consumption goods than, say, saving up for their retirement.

                – Luaan
                10 hours ago










              1




              1





              No, the context is even simpler. A larger quote helps: "The long run is a misleading guide to current affairs. In the long run we are all dead. Economists set themselves too easy, too useless a task if in tempestuous seasons they can only tell us that when the storm is past the ocean is flat again.". He was merely arguing for interventionist policies, against the classical economic position that interventions do more harm than good (and that waiting for the ocean to calm down is better than trying to force it to calm down; curious Keynes would use an example where we don't try to fight :)).

              – Luaan
              10 hours ago





              No, the context is even simpler. A larger quote helps: "The long run is a misleading guide to current affairs. In the long run we are all dead. Economists set themselves too easy, too useless a task if in tempestuous seasons they can only tell us that when the storm is past the ocean is flat again.". He was merely arguing for interventionist policies, against the classical economic position that interventions do more harm than good (and that waiting for the ocean to calm down is better than trying to force it to calm down; curious Keynes would use an example where we don't try to fight :)).

              – Luaan
              10 hours ago













              To Keynes, inflation wasn't even a consequence - it was a tool of his interventionist policies. For example, as a way to reduce the real earnings of people who aren't worth their real wages, without lowering the nominal wages or having them fired. He also stipulated that spending should be encouraged, while investment should be discouraged - if money loses value over time (monetary inflation), people are more likely to spend their income on consumption goods than, say, saving up for their retirement.

              – Luaan
              10 hours ago







              To Keynes, inflation wasn't even a consequence - it was a tool of his interventionist policies. For example, as a way to reduce the real earnings of people who aren't worth their real wages, without lowering the nominal wages or having them fired. He also stipulated that spending should be encouraged, while investment should be discouraged - if money loses value over time (monetary inflation), people are more likely to spend their income on consumption goods than, say, saving up for their retirement.

              – Luaan
              10 hours ago













              3














              I have previously taught a similar course in the UK and would use a quote like this without concern. In my experience UG students are totally unconcerned about their eventual demise.



              However, the point of including such aphorisms is that they allow you, the lecturer, to convey something with a bit more interest/ passion / excitement, your students probably won’t get much out of them directly. Thus, if you are uncomfortable about this quote then it isn’t going to serve its purpose and you should drop it.






              share|improve this answer




























                3














                I have previously taught a similar course in the UK and would use a quote like this without concern. In my experience UG students are totally unconcerned about their eventual demise.



                However, the point of including such aphorisms is that they allow you, the lecturer, to convey something with a bit more interest/ passion / excitement, your students probably won’t get much out of them directly. Thus, if you are uncomfortable about this quote then it isn’t going to serve its purpose and you should drop it.






                share|improve this answer


























                  3












                  3








                  3







                  I have previously taught a similar course in the UK and would use a quote like this without concern. In my experience UG students are totally unconcerned about their eventual demise.



                  However, the point of including such aphorisms is that they allow you, the lecturer, to convey something with a bit more interest/ passion / excitement, your students probably won’t get much out of them directly. Thus, if you are uncomfortable about this quote then it isn’t going to serve its purpose and you should drop it.






                  share|improve this answer













                  I have previously taught a similar course in the UK and would use a quote like this without concern. In my experience UG students are totally unconcerned about their eventual demise.



                  However, the point of including such aphorisms is that they allow you, the lecturer, to convey something with a bit more interest/ passion / excitement, your students probably won’t get much out of them directly. Thus, if you are uncomfortable about this quote then it isn’t going to serve its purpose and you should drop it.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered yesterday









                  dothyphendotdothyphendot

                  645159




                  645159






















                      TSE is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










                      draft saved

                      draft discarded


















                      TSE is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













                      TSE is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                      TSE is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Academia Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f126760%2fquoting-keynes-in-a-lecture%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      How did Captain America manage to do this?

                      迪纳利

                      南乌拉尔铁路局