Finding quadratic residues without Legendre symbols












7












$begingroup$


I ran into two very similar problems concerning quadratic residues, and I'm having a bit of trouble working through them. These problems are supposed to rely exclusively on the theory of cyclic groups, without use of Legendre symbols. I'm posting both in one question since I roughly managed to solve the first one and it's meant to show my thought process towards solving the second.




Let $p$ be a prime congruent to $1$ modulo $3$. Show that there exists
an $a in mathbb{Z}$ such that $a^2 + a + 1 equiv 0 textrm{ mod } p$ and
conclude that $-3$ is a square modulo $p$.




To solve this one, I let $p = 3k + 1$, and take $g in (mathbb{Z}_p, times)$ to be a generator from which follows that $g^{3k} - 1 = (g^k - 1)(g^{2k} + g^k + 1) equiv 0 textrm{ mod } p$. Since $g$ is a generator, $g^k ne 1$. To conclude $-3$ is a square, I (somewhat randomly) noticed that



begin{align*}
(g^k - g^{-k})^2 &= g^{2k} - 2 + g^{-2k} \
&= g^{2k} + g^k + 1 - 3 \
&equiv -3 textrm{ mod } p
end{align*}



I was wondering, is there any significance to the element $g^k - g^{-k}$ as a root for $-3$? Is there any way to intuitively know immediately that's the square you're looking for? I remember seeing similarly defined elements before, and I pretty much just plugged it in hoping for the best, without really knowing what I was doing. The next problem has me completely stumped.




Let $p$ be a prime congruent to $1$ modulo $5$. Show that there exists
an $a in mathbb{Z}$ such that $(a + a⁴)² + (a + a⁴) - 1 equiv 0 textrm{ mod } p$ and conclude that $5$ is a square modulo $p$.




I sort of have this sense that I'm gonna need an element of order $10$, i.e. $g^{frac{5k}{2}}$ where $g$ is yet again a generator, however I can't seem to get anywhere with this. If I let $x = a + a^4$, then I can tell I'm basically looking for an element $x$ which has the next element $x + 1$ as its inverse, but that doesn't really help me forward.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    7












    $begingroup$


    I ran into two very similar problems concerning quadratic residues, and I'm having a bit of trouble working through them. These problems are supposed to rely exclusively on the theory of cyclic groups, without use of Legendre symbols. I'm posting both in one question since I roughly managed to solve the first one and it's meant to show my thought process towards solving the second.




    Let $p$ be a prime congruent to $1$ modulo $3$. Show that there exists
    an $a in mathbb{Z}$ such that $a^2 + a + 1 equiv 0 textrm{ mod } p$ and
    conclude that $-3$ is a square modulo $p$.




    To solve this one, I let $p = 3k + 1$, and take $g in (mathbb{Z}_p, times)$ to be a generator from which follows that $g^{3k} - 1 = (g^k - 1)(g^{2k} + g^k + 1) equiv 0 textrm{ mod } p$. Since $g$ is a generator, $g^k ne 1$. To conclude $-3$ is a square, I (somewhat randomly) noticed that



    begin{align*}
    (g^k - g^{-k})^2 &= g^{2k} - 2 + g^{-2k} \
    &= g^{2k} + g^k + 1 - 3 \
    &equiv -3 textrm{ mod } p
    end{align*}



    I was wondering, is there any significance to the element $g^k - g^{-k}$ as a root for $-3$? Is there any way to intuitively know immediately that's the square you're looking for? I remember seeing similarly defined elements before, and I pretty much just plugged it in hoping for the best, without really knowing what I was doing. The next problem has me completely stumped.




    Let $p$ be a prime congruent to $1$ modulo $5$. Show that there exists
    an $a in mathbb{Z}$ such that $(a + a⁴)² + (a + a⁴) - 1 equiv 0 textrm{ mod } p$ and conclude that $5$ is a square modulo $p$.




    I sort of have this sense that I'm gonna need an element of order $10$, i.e. $g^{frac{5k}{2}}$ where $g$ is yet again a generator, however I can't seem to get anywhere with this. If I let $x = a + a^4$, then I can tell I'm basically looking for an element $x$ which has the next element $x + 1$ as its inverse, but that doesn't really help me forward.










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      7












      7








      7





      $begingroup$


      I ran into two very similar problems concerning quadratic residues, and I'm having a bit of trouble working through them. These problems are supposed to rely exclusively on the theory of cyclic groups, without use of Legendre symbols. I'm posting both in one question since I roughly managed to solve the first one and it's meant to show my thought process towards solving the second.




      Let $p$ be a prime congruent to $1$ modulo $3$. Show that there exists
      an $a in mathbb{Z}$ such that $a^2 + a + 1 equiv 0 textrm{ mod } p$ and
      conclude that $-3$ is a square modulo $p$.




      To solve this one, I let $p = 3k + 1$, and take $g in (mathbb{Z}_p, times)$ to be a generator from which follows that $g^{3k} - 1 = (g^k - 1)(g^{2k} + g^k + 1) equiv 0 textrm{ mod } p$. Since $g$ is a generator, $g^k ne 1$. To conclude $-3$ is a square, I (somewhat randomly) noticed that



      begin{align*}
      (g^k - g^{-k})^2 &= g^{2k} - 2 + g^{-2k} \
      &= g^{2k} + g^k + 1 - 3 \
      &equiv -3 textrm{ mod } p
      end{align*}



      I was wondering, is there any significance to the element $g^k - g^{-k}$ as a root for $-3$? Is there any way to intuitively know immediately that's the square you're looking for? I remember seeing similarly defined elements before, and I pretty much just plugged it in hoping for the best, without really knowing what I was doing. The next problem has me completely stumped.




      Let $p$ be a prime congruent to $1$ modulo $5$. Show that there exists
      an $a in mathbb{Z}$ such that $(a + a⁴)² + (a + a⁴) - 1 equiv 0 textrm{ mod } p$ and conclude that $5$ is a square modulo $p$.




      I sort of have this sense that I'm gonna need an element of order $10$, i.e. $g^{frac{5k}{2}}$ where $g$ is yet again a generator, however I can't seem to get anywhere with this. If I let $x = a + a^4$, then I can tell I'm basically looking for an element $x$ which has the next element $x + 1$ as its inverse, but that doesn't really help me forward.










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      I ran into two very similar problems concerning quadratic residues, and I'm having a bit of trouble working through them. These problems are supposed to rely exclusively on the theory of cyclic groups, without use of Legendre symbols. I'm posting both in one question since I roughly managed to solve the first one and it's meant to show my thought process towards solving the second.




      Let $p$ be a prime congruent to $1$ modulo $3$. Show that there exists
      an $a in mathbb{Z}$ such that $a^2 + a + 1 equiv 0 textrm{ mod } p$ and
      conclude that $-3$ is a square modulo $p$.




      To solve this one, I let $p = 3k + 1$, and take $g in (mathbb{Z}_p, times)$ to be a generator from which follows that $g^{3k} - 1 = (g^k - 1)(g^{2k} + g^k + 1) equiv 0 textrm{ mod } p$. Since $g$ is a generator, $g^k ne 1$. To conclude $-3$ is a square, I (somewhat randomly) noticed that



      begin{align*}
      (g^k - g^{-k})^2 &= g^{2k} - 2 + g^{-2k} \
      &= g^{2k} + g^k + 1 - 3 \
      &equiv -3 textrm{ mod } p
      end{align*}



      I was wondering, is there any significance to the element $g^k - g^{-k}$ as a root for $-3$? Is there any way to intuitively know immediately that's the square you're looking for? I remember seeing similarly defined elements before, and I pretty much just plugged it in hoping for the best, without really knowing what I was doing. The next problem has me completely stumped.




      Let $p$ be a prime congruent to $1$ modulo $5$. Show that there exists
      an $a in mathbb{Z}$ such that $(a + a⁴)² + (a + a⁴) - 1 equiv 0 textrm{ mod } p$ and conclude that $5$ is a square modulo $p$.




      I sort of have this sense that I'm gonna need an element of order $10$, i.e. $g^{frac{5k}{2}}$ where $g$ is yet again a generator, however I can't seem to get anywhere with this. If I let $x = a + a^4$, then I can tell I'm basically looking for an element $x$ which has the next element $x + 1$ as its inverse, but that doesn't really help me forward.







      number-theory prime-numbers modular-arithmetic cyclic-groups quadratic-residues






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Mar 29 at 14:57









      ZenoZeno

      846




      846






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2












          $begingroup$

          Hint: If $a^5 = 1$ then $a^4 = a^{-1}$ and $(a+a^4)^2 + (a+a^4) - 1 = a^{-2}(a^4 + a^3 + a^2 + a + 1)$.



          Also if $x^2 + x - 1 = 0$ in $mathbb Z_p$, then $4(x^2 + x - 1) = (2x+1)^2 - 5 = 0$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Right, ofcourse. The sum of all roots of unity equals zero. That was a crucial bit I was missing. I'm assuming you forgot an exponent on your $2$ in your second line but I understand what you're doing, thank you.
            $endgroup$
            – Zeno
            Mar 29 at 18:45






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Fixed, thank you. The 2 you saw in the second line should be in the parenthesis.
            $endgroup$
            – Hw Chu
            Mar 29 at 20:23










          • $begingroup$
            Also is it possible the $a^{-2}$ at the end is kind of arbitrary? Unless I'm mistaken using the distributive property $a(a^4 + a^3 + a^2 + a + 1) = a^5 + a^4 + a^3 + a^2 + a = a^4 + a^3 + a^2 + a + 1$ which would mean you can fill in just about any power of a instead of just $a^{-2}$.
            $endgroup$
            – Zeno
            2 days ago








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Well that is true. By the same reason as in your post, if $a neq 1$ and $a^5 = 1$, then $a^4 + a^3 + a^2 + a + 1 = 0$ so changing $a^{-2}$ to anything else yields a zero after all. That $a^{-2}$ term emerges from the expansion of $$(a+a^4)^2 + (a+a^4) - 1 = (a + a^{-1})^2 + (a + a^{-1}) - 1 = cdots$$
            $endgroup$
            – Hw Chu
            2 days ago










          • $begingroup$
            Ah I see. Yes I was curious about where you got that $-2$ from specifically I didn't catch it immediately.
            $endgroup$
            – Zeno
            11 hours ago



















          2












          $begingroup$

          A substantial part of your question seems to be “how do I intuitively arrive at an expression which yields the desired square root?”. I want to address this first.



          In both cases the question is structured as “show there exists a solution to this quadratic, hence $d$ is a square modulo $p$”. In the first question the quadratic is $x^2+x+1$, and in the second question it’s $x^2+x-1$. Notice that in each case the desired square root is exactly the discriminant $b^2 - 4ac$ from the quadratic formula.



          Intuitively, the idea is that if a ring contains solutions to the quadratic then the square root in the quadratic formula “should” work in that ring. (This isn’t universally true: when a cubic polynomial has all real roots, the cubic formula still involves taking square roots of negative numbers.). The way to expose this explicitly is just to complete the square:



          $$x^2 + x + 1 = 0, \
          4x^2 + 4x + 4 = 0, \
          4x^2 + 4x + 1 = -3, \
          (2x+1)^2 = -3.$$



          As for how to guess at the element which makes it work, in both cases we know that $mathbb Z_p$ contains a primitive $r$th root of unity for $r=3$ and $r=5$ respectively. In some sense that’s about all the specialized knowledge we possess. I think the author is hoping/expecting the reader to first try plugging in that root of unity into $a$, since there’s no simpler value to choose from, and the questions are designed to make this work on that first try.



          For the second question it may have resulted in a rather intimidating-looking expression hiding inside the quadratic, but presumably the intent was for the first question to go very smoothly, giving the reader the hope that the exact same strategy will work for the second.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$









          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Crystal clear, thank you. It would seem I can't approve both answers simultaneously even though they both kinda contributed to me fully understanding the problem
            $endgroup$
            – Zeno
            Mar 29 at 18:51












          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3167222%2ffinding-quadratic-residues-without-legendre-symbols%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes








          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          2












          $begingroup$

          Hint: If $a^5 = 1$ then $a^4 = a^{-1}$ and $(a+a^4)^2 + (a+a^4) - 1 = a^{-2}(a^4 + a^3 + a^2 + a + 1)$.



          Also if $x^2 + x - 1 = 0$ in $mathbb Z_p$, then $4(x^2 + x - 1) = (2x+1)^2 - 5 = 0$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Right, ofcourse. The sum of all roots of unity equals zero. That was a crucial bit I was missing. I'm assuming you forgot an exponent on your $2$ in your second line but I understand what you're doing, thank you.
            $endgroup$
            – Zeno
            Mar 29 at 18:45






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Fixed, thank you. The 2 you saw in the second line should be in the parenthesis.
            $endgroup$
            – Hw Chu
            Mar 29 at 20:23










          • $begingroup$
            Also is it possible the $a^{-2}$ at the end is kind of arbitrary? Unless I'm mistaken using the distributive property $a(a^4 + a^3 + a^2 + a + 1) = a^5 + a^4 + a^3 + a^2 + a = a^4 + a^3 + a^2 + a + 1$ which would mean you can fill in just about any power of a instead of just $a^{-2}$.
            $endgroup$
            – Zeno
            2 days ago








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Well that is true. By the same reason as in your post, if $a neq 1$ and $a^5 = 1$, then $a^4 + a^3 + a^2 + a + 1 = 0$ so changing $a^{-2}$ to anything else yields a zero after all. That $a^{-2}$ term emerges from the expansion of $$(a+a^4)^2 + (a+a^4) - 1 = (a + a^{-1})^2 + (a + a^{-1}) - 1 = cdots$$
            $endgroup$
            – Hw Chu
            2 days ago










          • $begingroup$
            Ah I see. Yes I was curious about where you got that $-2$ from specifically I didn't catch it immediately.
            $endgroup$
            – Zeno
            11 hours ago
















          2












          $begingroup$

          Hint: If $a^5 = 1$ then $a^4 = a^{-1}$ and $(a+a^4)^2 + (a+a^4) - 1 = a^{-2}(a^4 + a^3 + a^2 + a + 1)$.



          Also if $x^2 + x - 1 = 0$ in $mathbb Z_p$, then $4(x^2 + x - 1) = (2x+1)^2 - 5 = 0$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Right, ofcourse. The sum of all roots of unity equals zero. That was a crucial bit I was missing. I'm assuming you forgot an exponent on your $2$ in your second line but I understand what you're doing, thank you.
            $endgroup$
            – Zeno
            Mar 29 at 18:45






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Fixed, thank you. The 2 you saw in the second line should be in the parenthesis.
            $endgroup$
            – Hw Chu
            Mar 29 at 20:23










          • $begingroup$
            Also is it possible the $a^{-2}$ at the end is kind of arbitrary? Unless I'm mistaken using the distributive property $a(a^4 + a^3 + a^2 + a + 1) = a^5 + a^4 + a^3 + a^2 + a = a^4 + a^3 + a^2 + a + 1$ which would mean you can fill in just about any power of a instead of just $a^{-2}$.
            $endgroup$
            – Zeno
            2 days ago








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Well that is true. By the same reason as in your post, if $a neq 1$ and $a^5 = 1$, then $a^4 + a^3 + a^2 + a + 1 = 0$ so changing $a^{-2}$ to anything else yields a zero after all. That $a^{-2}$ term emerges from the expansion of $$(a+a^4)^2 + (a+a^4) - 1 = (a + a^{-1})^2 + (a + a^{-1}) - 1 = cdots$$
            $endgroup$
            – Hw Chu
            2 days ago










          • $begingroup$
            Ah I see. Yes I was curious about where you got that $-2$ from specifically I didn't catch it immediately.
            $endgroup$
            – Zeno
            11 hours ago














          2












          2








          2





          $begingroup$

          Hint: If $a^5 = 1$ then $a^4 = a^{-1}$ and $(a+a^4)^2 + (a+a^4) - 1 = a^{-2}(a^4 + a^3 + a^2 + a + 1)$.



          Also if $x^2 + x - 1 = 0$ in $mathbb Z_p$, then $4(x^2 + x - 1) = (2x+1)^2 - 5 = 0$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          Hint: If $a^5 = 1$ then $a^4 = a^{-1}$ and $(a+a^4)^2 + (a+a^4) - 1 = a^{-2}(a^4 + a^3 + a^2 + a + 1)$.



          Also if $x^2 + x - 1 = 0$ in $mathbb Z_p$, then $4(x^2 + x - 1) = (2x+1)^2 - 5 = 0$.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Mar 29 at 20:22

























          answered Mar 29 at 15:14









          Hw ChuHw Chu

          3,337519




          3,337519












          • $begingroup$
            Right, ofcourse. The sum of all roots of unity equals zero. That was a crucial bit I was missing. I'm assuming you forgot an exponent on your $2$ in your second line but I understand what you're doing, thank you.
            $endgroup$
            – Zeno
            Mar 29 at 18:45






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Fixed, thank you. The 2 you saw in the second line should be in the parenthesis.
            $endgroup$
            – Hw Chu
            Mar 29 at 20:23










          • $begingroup$
            Also is it possible the $a^{-2}$ at the end is kind of arbitrary? Unless I'm mistaken using the distributive property $a(a^4 + a^3 + a^2 + a + 1) = a^5 + a^4 + a^3 + a^2 + a = a^4 + a^3 + a^2 + a + 1$ which would mean you can fill in just about any power of a instead of just $a^{-2}$.
            $endgroup$
            – Zeno
            2 days ago








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Well that is true. By the same reason as in your post, if $a neq 1$ and $a^5 = 1$, then $a^4 + a^3 + a^2 + a + 1 = 0$ so changing $a^{-2}$ to anything else yields a zero after all. That $a^{-2}$ term emerges from the expansion of $$(a+a^4)^2 + (a+a^4) - 1 = (a + a^{-1})^2 + (a + a^{-1}) - 1 = cdots$$
            $endgroup$
            – Hw Chu
            2 days ago










          • $begingroup$
            Ah I see. Yes I was curious about where you got that $-2$ from specifically I didn't catch it immediately.
            $endgroup$
            – Zeno
            11 hours ago


















          • $begingroup$
            Right, ofcourse. The sum of all roots of unity equals zero. That was a crucial bit I was missing. I'm assuming you forgot an exponent on your $2$ in your second line but I understand what you're doing, thank you.
            $endgroup$
            – Zeno
            Mar 29 at 18:45






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Fixed, thank you. The 2 you saw in the second line should be in the parenthesis.
            $endgroup$
            – Hw Chu
            Mar 29 at 20:23










          • $begingroup$
            Also is it possible the $a^{-2}$ at the end is kind of arbitrary? Unless I'm mistaken using the distributive property $a(a^4 + a^3 + a^2 + a + 1) = a^5 + a^4 + a^3 + a^2 + a = a^4 + a^3 + a^2 + a + 1$ which would mean you can fill in just about any power of a instead of just $a^{-2}$.
            $endgroup$
            – Zeno
            2 days ago








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Well that is true. By the same reason as in your post, if $a neq 1$ and $a^5 = 1$, then $a^4 + a^3 + a^2 + a + 1 = 0$ so changing $a^{-2}$ to anything else yields a zero after all. That $a^{-2}$ term emerges from the expansion of $$(a+a^4)^2 + (a+a^4) - 1 = (a + a^{-1})^2 + (a + a^{-1}) - 1 = cdots$$
            $endgroup$
            – Hw Chu
            2 days ago










          • $begingroup$
            Ah I see. Yes I was curious about where you got that $-2$ from specifically I didn't catch it immediately.
            $endgroup$
            – Zeno
            11 hours ago
















          $begingroup$
          Right, ofcourse. The sum of all roots of unity equals zero. That was a crucial bit I was missing. I'm assuming you forgot an exponent on your $2$ in your second line but I understand what you're doing, thank you.
          $endgroup$
          – Zeno
          Mar 29 at 18:45




          $begingroup$
          Right, ofcourse. The sum of all roots of unity equals zero. That was a crucial bit I was missing. I'm assuming you forgot an exponent on your $2$ in your second line but I understand what you're doing, thank you.
          $endgroup$
          – Zeno
          Mar 29 at 18:45




          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          Fixed, thank you. The 2 you saw in the second line should be in the parenthesis.
          $endgroup$
          – Hw Chu
          Mar 29 at 20:23




          $begingroup$
          Fixed, thank you. The 2 you saw in the second line should be in the parenthesis.
          $endgroup$
          – Hw Chu
          Mar 29 at 20:23












          $begingroup$
          Also is it possible the $a^{-2}$ at the end is kind of arbitrary? Unless I'm mistaken using the distributive property $a(a^4 + a^3 + a^2 + a + 1) = a^5 + a^4 + a^3 + a^2 + a = a^4 + a^3 + a^2 + a + 1$ which would mean you can fill in just about any power of a instead of just $a^{-2}$.
          $endgroup$
          – Zeno
          2 days ago






          $begingroup$
          Also is it possible the $a^{-2}$ at the end is kind of arbitrary? Unless I'm mistaken using the distributive property $a(a^4 + a^3 + a^2 + a + 1) = a^5 + a^4 + a^3 + a^2 + a = a^4 + a^3 + a^2 + a + 1$ which would mean you can fill in just about any power of a instead of just $a^{-2}$.
          $endgroup$
          – Zeno
          2 days ago






          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          Well that is true. By the same reason as in your post, if $a neq 1$ and $a^5 = 1$, then $a^4 + a^3 + a^2 + a + 1 = 0$ so changing $a^{-2}$ to anything else yields a zero after all. That $a^{-2}$ term emerges from the expansion of $$(a+a^4)^2 + (a+a^4) - 1 = (a + a^{-1})^2 + (a + a^{-1}) - 1 = cdots$$
          $endgroup$
          – Hw Chu
          2 days ago




          $begingroup$
          Well that is true. By the same reason as in your post, if $a neq 1$ and $a^5 = 1$, then $a^4 + a^3 + a^2 + a + 1 = 0$ so changing $a^{-2}$ to anything else yields a zero after all. That $a^{-2}$ term emerges from the expansion of $$(a+a^4)^2 + (a+a^4) - 1 = (a + a^{-1})^2 + (a + a^{-1}) - 1 = cdots$$
          $endgroup$
          – Hw Chu
          2 days ago












          $begingroup$
          Ah I see. Yes I was curious about where you got that $-2$ from specifically I didn't catch it immediately.
          $endgroup$
          – Zeno
          11 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          Ah I see. Yes I was curious about where you got that $-2$ from specifically I didn't catch it immediately.
          $endgroup$
          – Zeno
          11 hours ago











          2












          $begingroup$

          A substantial part of your question seems to be “how do I intuitively arrive at an expression which yields the desired square root?”. I want to address this first.



          In both cases the question is structured as “show there exists a solution to this quadratic, hence $d$ is a square modulo $p$”. In the first question the quadratic is $x^2+x+1$, and in the second question it’s $x^2+x-1$. Notice that in each case the desired square root is exactly the discriminant $b^2 - 4ac$ from the quadratic formula.



          Intuitively, the idea is that if a ring contains solutions to the quadratic then the square root in the quadratic formula “should” work in that ring. (This isn’t universally true: when a cubic polynomial has all real roots, the cubic formula still involves taking square roots of negative numbers.). The way to expose this explicitly is just to complete the square:



          $$x^2 + x + 1 = 0, \
          4x^2 + 4x + 4 = 0, \
          4x^2 + 4x + 1 = -3, \
          (2x+1)^2 = -3.$$



          As for how to guess at the element which makes it work, in both cases we know that $mathbb Z_p$ contains a primitive $r$th root of unity for $r=3$ and $r=5$ respectively. In some sense that’s about all the specialized knowledge we possess. I think the author is hoping/expecting the reader to first try plugging in that root of unity into $a$, since there’s no simpler value to choose from, and the questions are designed to make this work on that first try.



          For the second question it may have resulted in a rather intimidating-looking expression hiding inside the quadratic, but presumably the intent was for the first question to go very smoothly, giving the reader the hope that the exact same strategy will work for the second.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$









          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Crystal clear, thank you. It would seem I can't approve both answers simultaneously even though they both kinda contributed to me fully understanding the problem
            $endgroup$
            – Zeno
            Mar 29 at 18:51
















          2












          $begingroup$

          A substantial part of your question seems to be “how do I intuitively arrive at an expression which yields the desired square root?”. I want to address this first.



          In both cases the question is structured as “show there exists a solution to this quadratic, hence $d$ is a square modulo $p$”. In the first question the quadratic is $x^2+x+1$, and in the second question it’s $x^2+x-1$. Notice that in each case the desired square root is exactly the discriminant $b^2 - 4ac$ from the quadratic formula.



          Intuitively, the idea is that if a ring contains solutions to the quadratic then the square root in the quadratic formula “should” work in that ring. (This isn’t universally true: when a cubic polynomial has all real roots, the cubic formula still involves taking square roots of negative numbers.). The way to expose this explicitly is just to complete the square:



          $$x^2 + x + 1 = 0, \
          4x^2 + 4x + 4 = 0, \
          4x^2 + 4x + 1 = -3, \
          (2x+1)^2 = -3.$$



          As for how to guess at the element which makes it work, in both cases we know that $mathbb Z_p$ contains a primitive $r$th root of unity for $r=3$ and $r=5$ respectively. In some sense that’s about all the specialized knowledge we possess. I think the author is hoping/expecting the reader to first try plugging in that root of unity into $a$, since there’s no simpler value to choose from, and the questions are designed to make this work on that first try.



          For the second question it may have resulted in a rather intimidating-looking expression hiding inside the quadratic, but presumably the intent was for the first question to go very smoothly, giving the reader the hope that the exact same strategy will work for the second.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$









          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Crystal clear, thank you. It would seem I can't approve both answers simultaneously even though they both kinda contributed to me fully understanding the problem
            $endgroup$
            – Zeno
            Mar 29 at 18:51














          2












          2








          2





          $begingroup$

          A substantial part of your question seems to be “how do I intuitively arrive at an expression which yields the desired square root?”. I want to address this first.



          In both cases the question is structured as “show there exists a solution to this quadratic, hence $d$ is a square modulo $p$”. In the first question the quadratic is $x^2+x+1$, and in the second question it’s $x^2+x-1$. Notice that in each case the desired square root is exactly the discriminant $b^2 - 4ac$ from the quadratic formula.



          Intuitively, the idea is that if a ring contains solutions to the quadratic then the square root in the quadratic formula “should” work in that ring. (This isn’t universally true: when a cubic polynomial has all real roots, the cubic formula still involves taking square roots of negative numbers.). The way to expose this explicitly is just to complete the square:



          $$x^2 + x + 1 = 0, \
          4x^2 + 4x + 4 = 0, \
          4x^2 + 4x + 1 = -3, \
          (2x+1)^2 = -3.$$



          As for how to guess at the element which makes it work, in both cases we know that $mathbb Z_p$ contains a primitive $r$th root of unity for $r=3$ and $r=5$ respectively. In some sense that’s about all the specialized knowledge we possess. I think the author is hoping/expecting the reader to first try plugging in that root of unity into $a$, since there’s no simpler value to choose from, and the questions are designed to make this work on that first try.



          For the second question it may have resulted in a rather intimidating-looking expression hiding inside the quadratic, but presumably the intent was for the first question to go very smoothly, giving the reader the hope that the exact same strategy will work for the second.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          A substantial part of your question seems to be “how do I intuitively arrive at an expression which yields the desired square root?”. I want to address this first.



          In both cases the question is structured as “show there exists a solution to this quadratic, hence $d$ is a square modulo $p$”. In the first question the quadratic is $x^2+x+1$, and in the second question it’s $x^2+x-1$. Notice that in each case the desired square root is exactly the discriminant $b^2 - 4ac$ from the quadratic formula.



          Intuitively, the idea is that if a ring contains solutions to the quadratic then the square root in the quadratic formula “should” work in that ring. (This isn’t universally true: when a cubic polynomial has all real roots, the cubic formula still involves taking square roots of negative numbers.). The way to expose this explicitly is just to complete the square:



          $$x^2 + x + 1 = 0, \
          4x^2 + 4x + 4 = 0, \
          4x^2 + 4x + 1 = -3, \
          (2x+1)^2 = -3.$$



          As for how to guess at the element which makes it work, in both cases we know that $mathbb Z_p$ contains a primitive $r$th root of unity for $r=3$ and $r=5$ respectively. In some sense that’s about all the specialized knowledge we possess. I think the author is hoping/expecting the reader to first try plugging in that root of unity into $a$, since there’s no simpler value to choose from, and the questions are designed to make this work on that first try.



          For the second question it may have resulted in a rather intimidating-looking expression hiding inside the quadratic, but presumably the intent was for the first question to go very smoothly, giving the reader the hope that the exact same strategy will work for the second.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Mar 29 at 17:43









          Erick WongErick Wong

          20.4k22666




          20.4k22666








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Crystal clear, thank you. It would seem I can't approve both answers simultaneously even though they both kinda contributed to me fully understanding the problem
            $endgroup$
            – Zeno
            Mar 29 at 18:51














          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Crystal clear, thank you. It would seem I can't approve both answers simultaneously even though they both kinda contributed to me fully understanding the problem
            $endgroup$
            – Zeno
            Mar 29 at 18:51








          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          Crystal clear, thank you. It would seem I can't approve both answers simultaneously even though they both kinda contributed to me fully understanding the problem
          $endgroup$
          – Zeno
          Mar 29 at 18:51




          $begingroup$
          Crystal clear, thank you. It would seem I can't approve both answers simultaneously even though they both kinda contributed to me fully understanding the problem
          $endgroup$
          – Zeno
          Mar 29 at 18:51


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3167222%2ffinding-quadratic-residues-without-legendre-symbols%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          How did Captain America manage to do this?

          迪纳利

          南乌拉尔铁路局