how to check a propriety using r studio
$begingroup$
I have to check that this propriety
$Z sim N(0,1)$ and $Usim chi ^{2}(10)$ then $ Z/sqrt{U/10} sim T(10)$
is true using r studio if anyone can help , much appreciate
probability statistics hypothesis-testing
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have to check that this propriety
$Z sim N(0,1)$ and $Usim chi ^{2}(10)$ then $ Z/sqrt{U/10} sim T(10)$
is true using r studio if anyone can help , much appreciate
probability statistics hypothesis-testing
$endgroup$
3
$begingroup$
What do you mean by "verify using R"? A programming language cannot rigorously verify this although it may produce evidence suggesting it is true. If you read the definition of a $t$-distribution, then your question follows almost immediately.
$endgroup$
– angryavian
Apr 5 at 16:52
$begingroup$
@angryavian : Maybe not in r studio (although I don't know all the capabilities of R), but there's a thing called computer-assisted proofs.
$endgroup$
– Raskolnikov
Apr 5 at 19:11
$begingroup$
@angryavian you can use R to sample from the distributions in question and use that to do some hypothesis testing.
$endgroup$
– JJJ
Apr 5 at 21:07
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have to check that this propriety
$Z sim N(0,1)$ and $Usim chi ^{2}(10)$ then $ Z/sqrt{U/10} sim T(10)$
is true using r studio if anyone can help , much appreciate
probability statistics hypothesis-testing
$endgroup$
I have to check that this propriety
$Z sim N(0,1)$ and $Usim chi ^{2}(10)$ then $ Z/sqrt{U/10} sim T(10)$
is true using r studio if anyone can help , much appreciate
probability statistics hypothesis-testing
probability statistics hypothesis-testing
asked Apr 5 at 16:46
JoshuaKJoshuaK
305
305
3
$begingroup$
What do you mean by "verify using R"? A programming language cannot rigorously verify this although it may produce evidence suggesting it is true. If you read the definition of a $t$-distribution, then your question follows almost immediately.
$endgroup$
– angryavian
Apr 5 at 16:52
$begingroup$
@angryavian : Maybe not in r studio (although I don't know all the capabilities of R), but there's a thing called computer-assisted proofs.
$endgroup$
– Raskolnikov
Apr 5 at 19:11
$begingroup$
@angryavian you can use R to sample from the distributions in question and use that to do some hypothesis testing.
$endgroup$
– JJJ
Apr 5 at 21:07
add a comment |
3
$begingroup$
What do you mean by "verify using R"? A programming language cannot rigorously verify this although it may produce evidence suggesting it is true. If you read the definition of a $t$-distribution, then your question follows almost immediately.
$endgroup$
– angryavian
Apr 5 at 16:52
$begingroup$
@angryavian : Maybe not in r studio (although I don't know all the capabilities of R), but there's a thing called computer-assisted proofs.
$endgroup$
– Raskolnikov
Apr 5 at 19:11
$begingroup$
@angryavian you can use R to sample from the distributions in question and use that to do some hypothesis testing.
$endgroup$
– JJJ
Apr 5 at 21:07
3
3
$begingroup$
What do you mean by "verify using R"? A programming language cannot rigorously verify this although it may produce evidence suggesting it is true. If you read the definition of a $t$-distribution, then your question follows almost immediately.
$endgroup$
– angryavian
Apr 5 at 16:52
$begingroup$
What do you mean by "verify using R"? A programming language cannot rigorously verify this although it may produce evidence suggesting it is true. If you read the definition of a $t$-distribution, then your question follows almost immediately.
$endgroup$
– angryavian
Apr 5 at 16:52
$begingroup$
@angryavian : Maybe not in r studio (although I don't know all the capabilities of R), but there's a thing called computer-assisted proofs.
$endgroup$
– Raskolnikov
Apr 5 at 19:11
$begingroup$
@angryavian : Maybe not in r studio (although I don't know all the capabilities of R), but there's a thing called computer-assisted proofs.
$endgroup$
– Raskolnikov
Apr 5 at 19:11
$begingroup$
@angryavian you can use R to sample from the distributions in question and use that to do some hypothesis testing.
$endgroup$
– JJJ
Apr 5 at 21:07
$begingroup$
@angryavian you can use R to sample from the distributions in question and use that to do some hypothesis testing.
$endgroup$
– JJJ
Apr 5 at 21:07
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
One approach could be simulation of thousands of values:
- Simulate $Z$ using
rnorm
- Simulate $U$ using
rchisq
- Do the division $Y = Z / sqrt{U / 10}$
- Simulate the same number of $T$ from the hypothesised $t$-distribution using
rt
- Sort $Y$ and $T$ and plot them against each other - you want to see a diagonal straight line essentially $y=x$ with a little noise; this is visual demonstration though not a proof that the distributions are the same
You can do similar things with the qqplot
function if you know what you are doing
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I agree with @angryavian that you can't do a 'proof' in R.
Also, it is crucial to state that random variables $Z$
and $U$ are independent. Then $Y = frac{Z}{U/sqrt{10}} sim mathsf{T}(10)$ by definition.
Here is R code to simulate a million values of $T$ [as in the Answer of @Henry (+1)], then to compare their histogram with the density of $mathsf{T}(10).$ This
is a graphical demonstration that $T$ has (at least very nearly) the claimed t distribution.
set.seed(405) # for reproducibility
z = rnorm(10^6); u = rchisq(10^6, 10)
y = z/sqrt(u/10)
hist(y, prob=T, br=50, col="skyblue2")
curve(dt(x, 10), add=T, lwd=2)
Furthermore, you could check that the quantiles of $Y$ very nearly match the theoretical quantiles of $mathsf{T}(10).$
summary(y)
Min. 1st Qu. Median Mean 3rd Qu. Max.
-10.641101 -0.699409 0.000059 0.000221 0.701253 9.802922
qt(c(.25,.5,.75), 10)
[1] -0.6998121 0.0000000 0.6998121
The summary above also shows that $bar Y approx 0.$ And the sample variance of the simulated values of $Y$ is very nearly the variance $nu/(nu - 2) = 10/8 = 1.25$ of Student's t distribution with $nu = 10$ degrees of freedom.
[In effect, two of the moments suggested by #GeorgeDewhirts (+1).]
var(y); 10/8
[1] 1.250115
[1] 1.25
Also, you could do a Kolmogorov-Smirnov goodness-of-fit test on the first 5000 values of $Y$ and check that the P-value exceeds 5%. (The K-S test in R is limited to 5000 observations.) Roughly speaking, this is a formal, quantitative way to do @Henry's comparison of sorted observations.
ks.test(y[1:5000], pt, 10)
One-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov test
data: y[1:5000]
D = 0.013661, p-value = 0.3083
alternative hypothesis: two-sided
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You could compare the moments of your distribution with the theoretical moments of $T(10)$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3176151%2fhow-to-check-a-propriety-using-r-studio%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
One approach could be simulation of thousands of values:
- Simulate $Z$ using
rnorm
- Simulate $U$ using
rchisq
- Do the division $Y = Z / sqrt{U / 10}$
- Simulate the same number of $T$ from the hypothesised $t$-distribution using
rt
- Sort $Y$ and $T$ and plot them against each other - you want to see a diagonal straight line essentially $y=x$ with a little noise; this is visual demonstration though not a proof that the distributions are the same
You can do similar things with the qqplot
function if you know what you are doing
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
One approach could be simulation of thousands of values:
- Simulate $Z$ using
rnorm
- Simulate $U$ using
rchisq
- Do the division $Y = Z / sqrt{U / 10}$
- Simulate the same number of $T$ from the hypothesised $t$-distribution using
rt
- Sort $Y$ and $T$ and plot them against each other - you want to see a diagonal straight line essentially $y=x$ with a little noise; this is visual demonstration though not a proof that the distributions are the same
You can do similar things with the qqplot
function if you know what you are doing
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
One approach could be simulation of thousands of values:
- Simulate $Z$ using
rnorm
- Simulate $U$ using
rchisq
- Do the division $Y = Z / sqrt{U / 10}$
- Simulate the same number of $T$ from the hypothesised $t$-distribution using
rt
- Sort $Y$ and $T$ and plot them against each other - you want to see a diagonal straight line essentially $y=x$ with a little noise; this is visual demonstration though not a proof that the distributions are the same
You can do similar things with the qqplot
function if you know what you are doing
$endgroup$
One approach could be simulation of thousands of values:
- Simulate $Z$ using
rnorm
- Simulate $U$ using
rchisq
- Do the division $Y = Z / sqrt{U / 10}$
- Simulate the same number of $T$ from the hypothesised $t$-distribution using
rt
- Sort $Y$ and $T$ and plot them against each other - you want to see a diagonal straight line essentially $y=x$ with a little noise; this is visual demonstration though not a proof that the distributions are the same
You can do similar things with the qqplot
function if you know what you are doing
answered Apr 5 at 17:52
HenryHenry
101k482170
101k482170
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I agree with @angryavian that you can't do a 'proof' in R.
Also, it is crucial to state that random variables $Z$
and $U$ are independent. Then $Y = frac{Z}{U/sqrt{10}} sim mathsf{T}(10)$ by definition.
Here is R code to simulate a million values of $T$ [as in the Answer of @Henry (+1)], then to compare their histogram with the density of $mathsf{T}(10).$ This
is a graphical demonstration that $T$ has (at least very nearly) the claimed t distribution.
set.seed(405) # for reproducibility
z = rnorm(10^6); u = rchisq(10^6, 10)
y = z/sqrt(u/10)
hist(y, prob=T, br=50, col="skyblue2")
curve(dt(x, 10), add=T, lwd=2)
Furthermore, you could check that the quantiles of $Y$ very nearly match the theoretical quantiles of $mathsf{T}(10).$
summary(y)
Min. 1st Qu. Median Mean 3rd Qu. Max.
-10.641101 -0.699409 0.000059 0.000221 0.701253 9.802922
qt(c(.25,.5,.75), 10)
[1] -0.6998121 0.0000000 0.6998121
The summary above also shows that $bar Y approx 0.$ And the sample variance of the simulated values of $Y$ is very nearly the variance $nu/(nu - 2) = 10/8 = 1.25$ of Student's t distribution with $nu = 10$ degrees of freedom.
[In effect, two of the moments suggested by #GeorgeDewhirts (+1).]
var(y); 10/8
[1] 1.250115
[1] 1.25
Also, you could do a Kolmogorov-Smirnov goodness-of-fit test on the first 5000 values of $Y$ and check that the P-value exceeds 5%. (The K-S test in R is limited to 5000 observations.) Roughly speaking, this is a formal, quantitative way to do @Henry's comparison of sorted observations.
ks.test(y[1:5000], pt, 10)
One-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov test
data: y[1:5000]
D = 0.013661, p-value = 0.3083
alternative hypothesis: two-sided
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I agree with @angryavian that you can't do a 'proof' in R.
Also, it is crucial to state that random variables $Z$
and $U$ are independent. Then $Y = frac{Z}{U/sqrt{10}} sim mathsf{T}(10)$ by definition.
Here is R code to simulate a million values of $T$ [as in the Answer of @Henry (+1)], then to compare their histogram with the density of $mathsf{T}(10).$ This
is a graphical demonstration that $T$ has (at least very nearly) the claimed t distribution.
set.seed(405) # for reproducibility
z = rnorm(10^6); u = rchisq(10^6, 10)
y = z/sqrt(u/10)
hist(y, prob=T, br=50, col="skyblue2")
curve(dt(x, 10), add=T, lwd=2)
Furthermore, you could check that the quantiles of $Y$ very nearly match the theoretical quantiles of $mathsf{T}(10).$
summary(y)
Min. 1st Qu. Median Mean 3rd Qu. Max.
-10.641101 -0.699409 0.000059 0.000221 0.701253 9.802922
qt(c(.25,.5,.75), 10)
[1] -0.6998121 0.0000000 0.6998121
The summary above also shows that $bar Y approx 0.$ And the sample variance of the simulated values of $Y$ is very nearly the variance $nu/(nu - 2) = 10/8 = 1.25$ of Student's t distribution with $nu = 10$ degrees of freedom.
[In effect, two of the moments suggested by #GeorgeDewhirts (+1).]
var(y); 10/8
[1] 1.250115
[1] 1.25
Also, you could do a Kolmogorov-Smirnov goodness-of-fit test on the first 5000 values of $Y$ and check that the P-value exceeds 5%. (The K-S test in R is limited to 5000 observations.) Roughly speaking, this is a formal, quantitative way to do @Henry's comparison of sorted observations.
ks.test(y[1:5000], pt, 10)
One-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov test
data: y[1:5000]
D = 0.013661, p-value = 0.3083
alternative hypothesis: two-sided
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I agree with @angryavian that you can't do a 'proof' in R.
Also, it is crucial to state that random variables $Z$
and $U$ are independent. Then $Y = frac{Z}{U/sqrt{10}} sim mathsf{T}(10)$ by definition.
Here is R code to simulate a million values of $T$ [as in the Answer of @Henry (+1)], then to compare their histogram with the density of $mathsf{T}(10).$ This
is a graphical demonstration that $T$ has (at least very nearly) the claimed t distribution.
set.seed(405) # for reproducibility
z = rnorm(10^6); u = rchisq(10^6, 10)
y = z/sqrt(u/10)
hist(y, prob=T, br=50, col="skyblue2")
curve(dt(x, 10), add=T, lwd=2)
Furthermore, you could check that the quantiles of $Y$ very nearly match the theoretical quantiles of $mathsf{T}(10).$
summary(y)
Min. 1st Qu. Median Mean 3rd Qu. Max.
-10.641101 -0.699409 0.000059 0.000221 0.701253 9.802922
qt(c(.25,.5,.75), 10)
[1] -0.6998121 0.0000000 0.6998121
The summary above also shows that $bar Y approx 0.$ And the sample variance of the simulated values of $Y$ is very nearly the variance $nu/(nu - 2) = 10/8 = 1.25$ of Student's t distribution with $nu = 10$ degrees of freedom.
[In effect, two of the moments suggested by #GeorgeDewhirts (+1).]
var(y); 10/8
[1] 1.250115
[1] 1.25
Also, you could do a Kolmogorov-Smirnov goodness-of-fit test on the first 5000 values of $Y$ and check that the P-value exceeds 5%. (The K-S test in R is limited to 5000 observations.) Roughly speaking, this is a formal, quantitative way to do @Henry's comparison of sorted observations.
ks.test(y[1:5000], pt, 10)
One-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov test
data: y[1:5000]
D = 0.013661, p-value = 0.3083
alternative hypothesis: two-sided
$endgroup$
I agree with @angryavian that you can't do a 'proof' in R.
Also, it is crucial to state that random variables $Z$
and $U$ are independent. Then $Y = frac{Z}{U/sqrt{10}} sim mathsf{T}(10)$ by definition.
Here is R code to simulate a million values of $T$ [as in the Answer of @Henry (+1)], then to compare their histogram with the density of $mathsf{T}(10).$ This
is a graphical demonstration that $T$ has (at least very nearly) the claimed t distribution.
set.seed(405) # for reproducibility
z = rnorm(10^6); u = rchisq(10^6, 10)
y = z/sqrt(u/10)
hist(y, prob=T, br=50, col="skyblue2")
curve(dt(x, 10), add=T, lwd=2)
Furthermore, you could check that the quantiles of $Y$ very nearly match the theoretical quantiles of $mathsf{T}(10).$
summary(y)
Min. 1st Qu. Median Mean 3rd Qu. Max.
-10.641101 -0.699409 0.000059 0.000221 0.701253 9.802922
qt(c(.25,.5,.75), 10)
[1] -0.6998121 0.0000000 0.6998121
The summary above also shows that $bar Y approx 0.$ And the sample variance of the simulated values of $Y$ is very nearly the variance $nu/(nu - 2) = 10/8 = 1.25$ of Student's t distribution with $nu = 10$ degrees of freedom.
[In effect, two of the moments suggested by #GeorgeDewhirts (+1).]
var(y); 10/8
[1] 1.250115
[1] 1.25
Also, you could do a Kolmogorov-Smirnov goodness-of-fit test on the first 5000 values of $Y$ and check that the P-value exceeds 5%. (The K-S test in R is limited to 5000 observations.) Roughly speaking, this is a formal, quantitative way to do @Henry's comparison of sorted observations.
ks.test(y[1:5000], pt, 10)
One-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov test
data: y[1:5000]
D = 0.013661, p-value = 0.3083
alternative hypothesis: two-sided
edited Apr 5 at 19:17
answered Apr 5 at 18:26
BruceETBruceET
36.3k71540
36.3k71540
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You could compare the moments of your distribution with the theoretical moments of $T(10)$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You could compare the moments of your distribution with the theoretical moments of $T(10)$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You could compare the moments of your distribution with the theoretical moments of $T(10)$
$endgroup$
You could compare the moments of your distribution with the theoretical moments of $T(10)$
answered Apr 5 at 17:16
George DewhirstGeorge Dewhirst
7514
7514
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3176151%2fhow-to-check-a-propriety-using-r-studio%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
3
$begingroup$
What do you mean by "verify using R"? A programming language cannot rigorously verify this although it may produce evidence suggesting it is true. If you read the definition of a $t$-distribution, then your question follows almost immediately.
$endgroup$
– angryavian
Apr 5 at 16:52
$begingroup$
@angryavian : Maybe not in r studio (although I don't know all the capabilities of R), but there's a thing called computer-assisted proofs.
$endgroup$
– Raskolnikov
Apr 5 at 19:11
$begingroup$
@angryavian you can use R to sample from the distributions in question and use that to do some hypothesis testing.
$endgroup$
– JJJ
Apr 5 at 21:07