apt-get package is not available but is referred to by another package - but cannot find that package
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
When I try to install a package with apt-get install, I'll occasionally see a message of the form
Package somePackage is not available, but is referred to by another package.
This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or
is only available from another source
E: Package somePackage has no installation candidate
Does anyone know how to find out what package(s) it is actually referring to?
Note:
I looked at "But is referred to by another package." - Finding that package and it suggested using apt-cache search to find the package that refers to it. Yet if I do this for somePackage, I won't get any output.
For example, apt-cache search openoffice.org-hunspell returns no output, but apt-cache search gcc returns several packages.
Edit:
There are several different packages that have caused the first part of the problem for me in the past, but the apt-cache search not turning anything up has (so far) only happened for the openoffice.org-hunspell package.
I guess that what I want to know the most is this: when I see the error message "Package somePackage has no installation candidate," I'd like to have a sure-fire way to know
- Was it replaced with another package (in which case knowing what the new package name is would be helpful); or
- Was it just removed altogether; or
- Is there some problem with
/etc/apt/sources.listthat means I can't get it.
apt package-management
edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:24
Community♦
1
asked Jan 16 '14 at 17:30
Bob Hogg
71116
|
show 2 more comments
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
When I try to install a package with apt-get install, I'll occasionally see a message of the form
Package somePackage is not available, but is referred to by another package.
This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or
is only available from another source
E: Package somePackage has no installation candidate
Does anyone know how to find out what package(s) it is actually referring to?
Note:
I looked at "But is referred to by another package." - Finding that package and it suggested using apt-cache search to find the package that refers to it. Yet if I do this for somePackage, I won't get any output.
For example, apt-cache search openoffice.org-hunspell returns no output, but apt-cache search gcc returns several packages.
Edit:
There are several different packages that have caused the first part of the problem for me in the past, but the apt-cache search not turning anything up has (so far) only happened for the openoffice.org-hunspell package.
I guess that what I want to know the most is this: when I see the error message "Package somePackage has no installation candidate," I'd like to have a sure-fire way to know
- Was it replaced with another package (in which case knowing what the new package name is would be helpful); or
- Was it just removed altogether; or
- Is there some problem with
/etc/apt/sources.listthat means I can't get it.
apt package-management
edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:24
Community♦
1
asked Jan 16 '14 at 17:30
Bob Hogg
71116
I very rarely see that message.
– user25656
Jan 16 '14 at 17:38
1
Is there only one package this is happening to for you, or many? And if one, which package? (synapticmight be another possible tool for checking packages you want to install, as well)
– Jez W
Jan 16 '14 at 17:38
Bad Example - OpenOffice is now Third party, use Libreoffice instead. If you want to install it, see here. Anyway, what version of Ubuntu are you using?
– Wilf
Jan 16 '14 at 17:39
I'm on 12.04. So technically Libreoffice is already installed. Yet there doesn't seem to be a corresponding package with the libreoffice prefix. For example, there doesn't seem to be a package called "libreoffice-hunspell".
– Bob Hogg
Jan 16 '14 at 21:26
1
You've done anapt-get updateright? I've heard that message can show up when a package has been removed from a repo, but you're APT cache doesn't know it yet.
– Xen2050
Dec 12 '14 at 14:43
|
show 2 more comments
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
When I try to install a package with apt-get install, I'll occasionally see a message of the form
Package somePackage is not available, but is referred to by another package.
This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or
is only available from another source
E: Package somePackage has no installation candidate
Does anyone know how to find out what package(s) it is actually referring to?
Note:
I looked at "But is referred to by another package." - Finding that package and it suggested using apt-cache search to find the package that refers to it. Yet if I do this for somePackage, I won't get any output.
For example, apt-cache search openoffice.org-hunspell returns no output, but apt-cache search gcc returns several packages.
Edit:
There are several different packages that have caused the first part of the problem for me in the past, but the apt-cache search not turning anything up has (so far) only happened for the openoffice.org-hunspell package.
I guess that what I want to know the most is this: when I see the error message "Package somePackage has no installation candidate," I'd like to have a sure-fire way to know
- Was it replaced with another package (in which case knowing what the new package name is would be helpful); or
- Was it just removed altogether; or
- Is there some problem with
/etc/apt/sources.listthat means I can't get it.
apt package-management
edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:24
Community♦
1
asked Jan 16 '14 at 17:30
Bob Hogg
71116
When I try to install a package with apt-get install, I'll occasionally see a message of the form
Package somePackage is not available, but is referred to by another package.
This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or
is only available from another source
E: Package somePackage has no installation candidate
Does anyone know how to find out what package(s) it is actually referring to?
Note:
I looked at "But is referred to by another package." - Finding that package and it suggested using apt-cache search to find the package that refers to it. Yet if I do this for somePackage, I won't get any output.
For example, apt-cache search openoffice.org-hunspell returns no output, but apt-cache search gcc returns several packages.
Edit:
There are several different packages that have caused the first part of the problem for me in the past, but the apt-cache search not turning anything up has (so far) only happened for the openoffice.org-hunspell package.
I guess that what I want to know the most is this: when I see the error message "Package somePackage has no installation candidate," I'd like to have a sure-fire way to know
- Was it replaced with another package (in which case knowing what the new package name is would be helpful); or
- Was it just removed altogether; or
- Is there some problem with
/etc/apt/sources.listthat means I can't get it.
apt package-management
apt package-management
edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:24
Community♦
1
asked Jan 16 '14 at 17:30
Bob Hogg
71116
edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:24
Community♦
1
asked Jan 16 '14 at 17:30
Bob Hogg
71116
edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:24
Community♦
1
edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:24
Community♦
1
edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:24
Community♦
1
1
asked Jan 16 '14 at 17:30
Bob Hogg
71116
asked Jan 16 '14 at 17:30
Bob Hogg
71116
asked Jan 16 '14 at 17:30
Bob Hogg
71116
71116
I very rarely see that message.
– user25656
Jan 16 '14 at 17:38
1
Is there only one package this is happening to for you, or many? And if one, which package? (synapticmight be another possible tool for checking packages you want to install, as well)
– Jez W
Jan 16 '14 at 17:38
Bad Example - OpenOffice is now Third party, use Libreoffice instead. If you want to install it, see here. Anyway, what version of Ubuntu are you using?
– Wilf
Jan 16 '14 at 17:39
I'm on 12.04. So technically Libreoffice is already installed. Yet there doesn't seem to be a corresponding package with the libreoffice prefix. For example, there doesn't seem to be a package called "libreoffice-hunspell".
– Bob Hogg
Jan 16 '14 at 21:26
1
You've done anapt-get updateright? I've heard that message can show up when a package has been removed from a repo, but you're APT cache doesn't know it yet.
– Xen2050
Dec 12 '14 at 14:43
|
show 2 more comments
I very rarely see that message.
– user25656
Jan 16 '14 at 17:38
1
Is there only one package this is happening to for you, or many? And if one, which package? (synapticmight be another possible tool for checking packages you want to install, as well)
– Jez W
Jan 16 '14 at 17:38
Bad Example - OpenOffice is now Third party, use Libreoffice instead. If you want to install it, see here. Anyway, what version of Ubuntu are you using?
– Wilf
Jan 16 '14 at 17:39
I'm on 12.04. So technically Libreoffice is already installed. Yet there doesn't seem to be a corresponding package with the libreoffice prefix. For example, there doesn't seem to be a package called "libreoffice-hunspell".
– Bob Hogg
Jan 16 '14 at 21:26
1
You've done anapt-get updateright? I've heard that message can show up when a package has been removed from a repo, but you're APT cache doesn't know it yet.
– Xen2050
Dec 12 '14 at 14:43
I very rarely see that message.
– user25656
Jan 16 '14 at 17:38
I very rarely see that message.
– user25656
Jan 16 '14 at 17:38
1
1
Is there only one package this is happening to for you, or many? And if one, which package? (
synaptic might be another possible tool for checking packages you want to install, as well)– Jez W
Jan 16 '14 at 17:38
Is there only one package this is happening to for you, or many? And if one, which package? (
synaptic might be another possible tool for checking packages you want to install, as well)– Jez W
Jan 16 '14 at 17:38
Bad Example - OpenOffice is now Third party, use Libreoffice instead. If you want to install it, see here. Anyway, what version of Ubuntu are you using?
– Wilf
Jan 16 '14 at 17:39
Bad Example - OpenOffice is now Third party, use Libreoffice instead. If you want to install it, see here. Anyway, what version of Ubuntu are you using?
– Wilf
Jan 16 '14 at 17:39
I'm on 12.04. So technically Libreoffice is already installed. Yet there doesn't seem to be a corresponding package with the libreoffice prefix. For example, there doesn't seem to be a package called "libreoffice-hunspell".
– Bob Hogg
Jan 16 '14 at 21:26
I'm on 12.04. So technically Libreoffice is already installed. Yet there doesn't seem to be a corresponding package with the libreoffice prefix. For example, there doesn't seem to be a package called "libreoffice-hunspell".
– Bob Hogg
Jan 16 '14 at 21:26
1
1
You've done an
apt-get update right? I've heard that message can show up when a package has been removed from a repo, but you're APT cache doesn't know it yet.– Xen2050
Dec 12 '14 at 14:43
You've done an
apt-get update right? I've heard that message can show up when a package has been removed from a repo, but you're APT cache doesn't know it yet.– Xen2050
Dec 12 '14 at 14:43
|
show 2 more comments
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
I had this kind of errors when the universe repos were not enabled (it was a minimal server install). Enabling them solved the issue (the package were provided by such repos). HTH.
answered Aug 29 at 7:53
Antonello Piemonte
16613
add a comment |
up vote
-1
down vote
Package somePackage is not available, but is referred to by another package.
This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or
is only available from another source
It means that a package have dependency, suggestion or recommendation to "somePackage", but somePackage itself and any associated meta data is not available. You should look, by yourself, for the replacement of somePackage (if the package was in the official repositories, it's very likely that there's a empty package that points to the replacement), in case the package has been renamed, or forget about it, in case you are trying to get a package that was removed from the repositories for any motive. There's simply no way to do this programmatically.
answered Jan 16 '14 at 19:40
Braiam
51.2k20134219
This is effectively a restatement of part of the question -- the questioner is aware it indicates that a package has been removed, he's trying to find a general way to determine what package is depending on the one named in the error message.
– Zeiss Ikon
Dec 16 '16 at 12:37
@ZeissIkon This is effectively a restatement of the answer: you can't.
– Braiam
Dec 16 '16 at 12:40
May want to clarify that in your answer, then. I didn't get that from what you wrote.
– Zeiss Ikon
Dec 16 '16 at 13:11
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
I had this kind of errors when the universe repos were not enabled (it was a minimal server install). Enabling them solved the issue (the package were provided by such repos). HTH.
answered Aug 29 at 7:53
Antonello Piemonte
16613
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
I had this kind of errors when the universe repos were not enabled (it was a minimal server install). Enabling them solved the issue (the package were provided by such repos). HTH.
answered Aug 29 at 7:53
Antonello Piemonte
16613
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
I had this kind of errors when the universe repos were not enabled (it was a minimal server install). Enabling them solved the issue (the package were provided by such repos). HTH.
answered Aug 29 at 7:53
Antonello Piemonte
16613
I had this kind of errors when the universe repos were not enabled (it was a minimal server install). Enabling them solved the issue (the package were provided by such repos). HTH.
answered Aug 29 at 7:53
Antonello Piemonte
16613
answered Aug 29 at 7:53
Antonello Piemonte
16613
answered Aug 29 at 7:53
Antonello Piemonte
16613
answered Aug 29 at 7:53
Antonello Piemonte
16613
16613
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
-1
down vote
Package somePackage is not available, but is referred to by another package.
This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or
is only available from another source
It means that a package have dependency, suggestion or recommendation to "somePackage", but somePackage itself and any associated meta data is not available. You should look, by yourself, for the replacement of somePackage (if the package was in the official repositories, it's very likely that there's a empty package that points to the replacement), in case the package has been renamed, or forget about it, in case you are trying to get a package that was removed from the repositories for any motive. There's simply no way to do this programmatically.
answered Jan 16 '14 at 19:40
Braiam
51.2k20134219
This is effectively a restatement of part of the question -- the questioner is aware it indicates that a package has been removed, he's trying to find a general way to determine what package is depending on the one named in the error message.
– Zeiss Ikon
Dec 16 '16 at 12:37
@ZeissIkon This is effectively a restatement of the answer: you can't.
– Braiam
Dec 16 '16 at 12:40
May want to clarify that in your answer, then. I didn't get that from what you wrote.
– Zeiss Ikon
Dec 16 '16 at 13:11
add a comment |
up vote
-1
down vote
Package somePackage is not available, but is referred to by another package.
This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or
is only available from another source
It means that a package have dependency, suggestion or recommendation to "somePackage", but somePackage itself and any associated meta data is not available. You should look, by yourself, for the replacement of somePackage (if the package was in the official repositories, it's very likely that there's a empty package that points to the replacement), in case the package has been renamed, or forget about it, in case you are trying to get a package that was removed from the repositories for any motive. There's simply no way to do this programmatically.
answered Jan 16 '14 at 19:40
Braiam
51.2k20134219
This is effectively a restatement of part of the question -- the questioner is aware it indicates that a package has been removed, he's trying to find a general way to determine what package is depending on the one named in the error message.
– Zeiss Ikon
Dec 16 '16 at 12:37
@ZeissIkon This is effectively a restatement of the answer: you can't.
– Braiam
Dec 16 '16 at 12:40
May want to clarify that in your answer, then. I didn't get that from what you wrote.
– Zeiss Ikon
Dec 16 '16 at 13:11
add a comment |
up vote
-1
down vote
up vote
-1
down vote
Package somePackage is not available, but is referred to by another package.
This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or
is only available from another source
It means that a package have dependency, suggestion or recommendation to "somePackage", but somePackage itself and any associated meta data is not available. You should look, by yourself, for the replacement of somePackage (if the package was in the official repositories, it's very likely that there's a empty package that points to the replacement), in case the package has been renamed, or forget about it, in case you are trying to get a package that was removed from the repositories for any motive. There's simply no way to do this programmatically.
answered Jan 16 '14 at 19:40
Braiam
51.2k20134219
Package somePackage is not available, but is referred to by another package.
This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or
is only available from another source
It means that a package have dependency, suggestion or recommendation to "somePackage", but somePackage itself and any associated meta data is not available. You should look, by yourself, for the replacement of somePackage (if the package was in the official repositories, it's very likely that there's a empty package that points to the replacement), in case the package has been renamed, or forget about it, in case you are trying to get a package that was removed from the repositories for any motive. There's simply no way to do this programmatically.
answered Jan 16 '14 at 19:40
Braiam
51.2k20134219
edited Dec 16 '16 at 13:16
answered Jan 16 '14 at 19:40
Braiam
51.2k20134219
answered Jan 16 '14 at 19:40
Braiam
51.2k20134219
answered Jan 16 '14 at 19:40
Braiam
51.2k20134219
51.2k20134219
This is effectively a restatement of part of the question -- the questioner is aware it indicates that a package has been removed, he's trying to find a general way to determine what package is depending on the one named in the error message.
– Zeiss Ikon
Dec 16 '16 at 12:37
@ZeissIkon This is effectively a restatement of the answer: you can't.
– Braiam
Dec 16 '16 at 12:40
May want to clarify that in your answer, then. I didn't get that from what you wrote.
– Zeiss Ikon
Dec 16 '16 at 13:11
add a comment |
This is effectively a restatement of part of the question -- the questioner is aware it indicates that a package has been removed, he's trying to find a general way to determine what package is depending on the one named in the error message.
– Zeiss Ikon
Dec 16 '16 at 12:37
@ZeissIkon This is effectively a restatement of the answer: you can't.
– Braiam
Dec 16 '16 at 12:40
May want to clarify that in your answer, then. I didn't get that from what you wrote.
– Zeiss Ikon
Dec 16 '16 at 13:11
This is effectively a restatement of part of the question -- the questioner is aware it indicates that a package has been removed, he's trying to find a general way to determine what package is depending on the one named in the error message.
– Zeiss Ikon
Dec 16 '16 at 12:37
This is effectively a restatement of part of the question -- the questioner is aware it indicates that a package has been removed, he's trying to find a general way to determine what package is depending on the one named in the error message.
– Zeiss Ikon
Dec 16 '16 at 12:37
@ZeissIkon This is effectively a restatement of the answer: you can't.
– Braiam
Dec 16 '16 at 12:40
@ZeissIkon This is effectively a restatement of the answer: you can't.
– Braiam
Dec 16 '16 at 12:40
May want to clarify that in your answer, then. I didn't get that from what you wrote.
– Zeiss Ikon
Dec 16 '16 at 13:11
May want to clarify that in your answer, then. I didn't get that from what you wrote.
– Zeiss Ikon
Dec 16 '16 at 13:11
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Ask Ubuntu!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f406488%2fapt-get-package-is-not-available-but-is-referred-to-by-another-package-but-can%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
I very rarely see that message.
– user25656
Jan 16 '14 at 17:38
1
Is there only one package this is happening to for you, or many? And if one, which package? (
synapticmight be another possible tool for checking packages you want to install, as well)– Jez W
Jan 16 '14 at 17:38
Bad Example - OpenOffice is now Third party, use Libreoffice instead. If you want to install it, see here. Anyway, what version of Ubuntu are you using?
– Wilf
Jan 16 '14 at 17:39
I'm on 12.04. So technically Libreoffice is already installed. Yet there doesn't seem to be a corresponding package with the libreoffice prefix. For example, there doesn't seem to be a package called "libreoffice-hunspell".
– Bob Hogg
Jan 16 '14 at 21:26
1
You've done an
apt-get updateright? I've heard that message can show up when a package has been removed from a repo, but you're APT cache doesn't know it yet.– Xen2050
Dec 12 '14 at 14:43