Comma preceding “with” clause at end of sentence
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I read a sentence that I found very awkward:
"This March was the hottest of the decade with every day above average."
My brain wants to add a comma before "with." I know one way to avoid the sentence altogether is to rephrase it as:
"With every day above average, this March was the hottest of the decade."
But, if I were not to rephrase it as such, would it be correct to add a comma or to leave it in its original form?
Edit: My original sentence is not very clear; I made it up quickly just as an example. A better example might be:
"It was the best game of the season with every player scoring at least one goal."
commas prepositional-phrases dependent-clause
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 20 mins ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I read a sentence that I found very awkward:
"This March was the hottest of the decade with every day above average."
My brain wants to add a comma before "with." I know one way to avoid the sentence altogether is to rephrase it as:
"With every day above average, this March was the hottest of the decade."
But, if I were not to rephrase it as such, would it be correct to add a comma or to leave it in its original form?
Edit: My original sentence is not very clear; I made it up quickly just as an example. A better example might be:
"It was the best game of the season with every player scoring at least one goal."
commas prepositional-phrases dependent-clause
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 20 mins ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I read a sentence that I found very awkward:
"This March was the hottest of the decade with every day above average."
My brain wants to add a comma before "with." I know one way to avoid the sentence altogether is to rephrase it as:
"With every day above average, this March was the hottest of the decade."
But, if I were not to rephrase it as such, would it be correct to add a comma or to leave it in its original form?
Edit: My original sentence is not very clear; I made it up quickly just as an example. A better example might be:
"It was the best game of the season with every player scoring at least one goal."
commas prepositional-phrases dependent-clause
I read a sentence that I found very awkward:
"This March was the hottest of the decade with every day above average."
My brain wants to add a comma before "with." I know one way to avoid the sentence altogether is to rephrase it as:
"With every day above average, this March was the hottest of the decade."
But, if I were not to rephrase it as such, would it be correct to add a comma or to leave it in its original form?
Edit: My original sentence is not very clear; I made it up quickly just as an example. A better example might be:
"It was the best game of the season with every player scoring at least one goal."
commas prepositional-phrases dependent-clause
commas prepositional-phrases dependent-clause
edited Nov 14 '17 at 22:27
asked Nov 14 '17 at 19:23
cocaccro
42
42
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 20 mins ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 20 mins ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
add a comment |
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
Without the comma the sentence describes March as being part of a decade during which every single day was above average.
Whether every day of said decade was above average heat, or above average something else, is a question.
Even with the comma it needs the word temperature at the end.
(I just joined about an hour ago so please forgive this answer if it offends in it's immaturity. )
Hi Carol, thank you. I actually just made up the sentence really quickly because the real sentence is work-related, so I can't share it. My main question is about the "with" clause -- I will update my question. Thank you!
– cocaccro
Nov 14 '17 at 22:26
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
I'm going to have another go, if you don't mind.
I think it needs the comma, otherwise it reads that this game was the best game of all the games played this season in which every player scored. With a comma it gives the impression that this game was the one and only game of the season in which every player scored, which, I think, is what you wanted it to say.
Thank you! I think you got it -- this is why the original structure just seemed off to me. It was saying the wrong thing.
– cocaccro
Nov 15 '17 at 13:44
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
I found following on Cambridge Dictionary
SENSES !
B2 [ C ] an ability to understand, recognize, value, or react to something, especially any of the five physical abilities to see, hear, smell, taste, and feel:
With her excellent sense of smell, she could tell if you were a smoker from the other side of the room.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
I am studying comma rules currently. Above all rules, there is the voice to use a comma where it is necessary to make your sentence easy to understand for your readers. Also rewriting it.
Including the subordinating conjunctions and about 16 other confirmed comma-rules, I wether find a rule for a sentence starting with "With" nor for
"with in the middle" where to put a comma. So listen to the voice above :-)
When we seeing the first phrase as intro, yes, the comma-rules say put a comma before the second phrase.
"With every day above average, this March was the hottest of the decade."
It's a parenthetical phrase adding detail to the main clause. Initially placed parentheticals are normally set off by a comma.
– Edwin Ashworth
Nov 14 '17 at 23:54
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
Without the comma the sentence describes March as being part of a decade during which every single day was above average.
Whether every day of said decade was above average heat, or above average something else, is a question.
Even with the comma it needs the word temperature at the end.
(I just joined about an hour ago so please forgive this answer if it offends in it's immaturity. )
Hi Carol, thank you. I actually just made up the sentence really quickly because the real sentence is work-related, so I can't share it. My main question is about the "with" clause -- I will update my question. Thank you!
– cocaccro
Nov 14 '17 at 22:26
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Without the comma the sentence describes March as being part of a decade during which every single day was above average.
Whether every day of said decade was above average heat, or above average something else, is a question.
Even with the comma it needs the word temperature at the end.
(I just joined about an hour ago so please forgive this answer if it offends in it's immaturity. )
Hi Carol, thank you. I actually just made up the sentence really quickly because the real sentence is work-related, so I can't share it. My main question is about the "with" clause -- I will update my question. Thank you!
– cocaccro
Nov 14 '17 at 22:26
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
Without the comma the sentence describes March as being part of a decade during which every single day was above average.
Whether every day of said decade was above average heat, or above average something else, is a question.
Even with the comma it needs the word temperature at the end.
(I just joined about an hour ago so please forgive this answer if it offends in it's immaturity. )
Without the comma the sentence describes March as being part of a decade during which every single day was above average.
Whether every day of said decade was above average heat, or above average something else, is a question.
Even with the comma it needs the word temperature at the end.
(I just joined about an hour ago so please forgive this answer if it offends in it's immaturity. )
answered Nov 14 '17 at 21:52
Carol Butler
42
42
Hi Carol, thank you. I actually just made up the sentence really quickly because the real sentence is work-related, so I can't share it. My main question is about the "with" clause -- I will update my question. Thank you!
– cocaccro
Nov 14 '17 at 22:26
add a comment |
Hi Carol, thank you. I actually just made up the sentence really quickly because the real sentence is work-related, so I can't share it. My main question is about the "with" clause -- I will update my question. Thank you!
– cocaccro
Nov 14 '17 at 22:26
Hi Carol, thank you. I actually just made up the sentence really quickly because the real sentence is work-related, so I can't share it. My main question is about the "with" clause -- I will update my question. Thank you!
– cocaccro
Nov 14 '17 at 22:26
Hi Carol, thank you. I actually just made up the sentence really quickly because the real sentence is work-related, so I can't share it. My main question is about the "with" clause -- I will update my question. Thank you!
– cocaccro
Nov 14 '17 at 22:26
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
I'm going to have another go, if you don't mind.
I think it needs the comma, otherwise it reads that this game was the best game of all the games played this season in which every player scored. With a comma it gives the impression that this game was the one and only game of the season in which every player scored, which, I think, is what you wanted it to say.
Thank you! I think you got it -- this is why the original structure just seemed off to me. It was saying the wrong thing.
– cocaccro
Nov 15 '17 at 13:44
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
I'm going to have another go, if you don't mind.
I think it needs the comma, otherwise it reads that this game was the best game of all the games played this season in which every player scored. With a comma it gives the impression that this game was the one and only game of the season in which every player scored, which, I think, is what you wanted it to say.
Thank you! I think you got it -- this is why the original structure just seemed off to me. It was saying the wrong thing.
– cocaccro
Nov 15 '17 at 13:44
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
I'm going to have another go, if you don't mind.
I think it needs the comma, otherwise it reads that this game was the best game of all the games played this season in which every player scored. With a comma it gives the impression that this game was the one and only game of the season in which every player scored, which, I think, is what you wanted it to say.
I'm going to have another go, if you don't mind.
I think it needs the comma, otherwise it reads that this game was the best game of all the games played this season in which every player scored. With a comma it gives the impression that this game was the one and only game of the season in which every player scored, which, I think, is what you wanted it to say.
answered Nov 15 '17 at 10:30
Carol Butler
42
42
Thank you! I think you got it -- this is why the original structure just seemed off to me. It was saying the wrong thing.
– cocaccro
Nov 15 '17 at 13:44
add a comment |
Thank you! I think you got it -- this is why the original structure just seemed off to me. It was saying the wrong thing.
– cocaccro
Nov 15 '17 at 13:44
Thank you! I think you got it -- this is why the original structure just seemed off to me. It was saying the wrong thing.
– cocaccro
Nov 15 '17 at 13:44
Thank you! I think you got it -- this is why the original structure just seemed off to me. It was saying the wrong thing.
– cocaccro
Nov 15 '17 at 13:44
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
I found following on Cambridge Dictionary
SENSES !
B2 [ C ] an ability to understand, recognize, value, or react to something, especially any of the five physical abilities to see, hear, smell, taste, and feel:
With her excellent sense of smell, she could tell if you were a smoker from the other side of the room.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
I found following on Cambridge Dictionary
SENSES !
B2 [ C ] an ability to understand, recognize, value, or react to something, especially any of the five physical abilities to see, hear, smell, taste, and feel:
With her excellent sense of smell, she could tell if you were a smoker from the other side of the room.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
I found following on Cambridge Dictionary
SENSES !
B2 [ C ] an ability to understand, recognize, value, or react to something, especially any of the five physical abilities to see, hear, smell, taste, and feel:
With her excellent sense of smell, she could tell if you were a smoker from the other side of the room.
I found following on Cambridge Dictionary
SENSES !
B2 [ C ] an ability to understand, recognize, value, or react to something, especially any of the five physical abilities to see, hear, smell, taste, and feel:
With her excellent sense of smell, she could tell if you were a smoker from the other side of the room.
answered Nov 15 '17 at 13:09
FrankMK
4951315
4951315
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
I am studying comma rules currently. Above all rules, there is the voice to use a comma where it is necessary to make your sentence easy to understand for your readers. Also rewriting it.
Including the subordinating conjunctions and about 16 other confirmed comma-rules, I wether find a rule for a sentence starting with "With" nor for
"with in the middle" where to put a comma. So listen to the voice above :-)
When we seeing the first phrase as intro, yes, the comma-rules say put a comma before the second phrase.
"With every day above average, this March was the hottest of the decade."
It's a parenthetical phrase adding detail to the main clause. Initially placed parentheticals are normally set off by a comma.
– Edwin Ashworth
Nov 14 '17 at 23:54
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
I am studying comma rules currently. Above all rules, there is the voice to use a comma where it is necessary to make your sentence easy to understand for your readers. Also rewriting it.
Including the subordinating conjunctions and about 16 other confirmed comma-rules, I wether find a rule for a sentence starting with "With" nor for
"with in the middle" where to put a comma. So listen to the voice above :-)
When we seeing the first phrase as intro, yes, the comma-rules say put a comma before the second phrase.
"With every day above average, this March was the hottest of the decade."
It's a parenthetical phrase adding detail to the main clause. Initially placed parentheticals are normally set off by a comma.
– Edwin Ashworth
Nov 14 '17 at 23:54
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
I am studying comma rules currently. Above all rules, there is the voice to use a comma where it is necessary to make your sentence easy to understand for your readers. Also rewriting it.
Including the subordinating conjunctions and about 16 other confirmed comma-rules, I wether find a rule for a sentence starting with "With" nor for
"with in the middle" where to put a comma. So listen to the voice above :-)
When we seeing the first phrase as intro, yes, the comma-rules say put a comma before the second phrase.
"With every day above average, this March was the hottest of the decade."
I am studying comma rules currently. Above all rules, there is the voice to use a comma where it is necessary to make your sentence easy to understand for your readers. Also rewriting it.
Including the subordinating conjunctions and about 16 other confirmed comma-rules, I wether find a rule for a sentence starting with "With" nor for
"with in the middle" where to put a comma. So listen to the voice above :-)
When we seeing the first phrase as intro, yes, the comma-rules say put a comma before the second phrase.
"With every day above average, this March was the hottest of the decade."
edited Nov 15 '17 at 13:12
answered Nov 14 '17 at 23:00
FrankMK
4951315
4951315
It's a parenthetical phrase adding detail to the main clause. Initially placed parentheticals are normally set off by a comma.
– Edwin Ashworth
Nov 14 '17 at 23:54
add a comment |
It's a parenthetical phrase adding detail to the main clause. Initially placed parentheticals are normally set off by a comma.
– Edwin Ashworth
Nov 14 '17 at 23:54
It's a parenthetical phrase adding detail to the main clause. Initially placed parentheticals are normally set off by a comma.
– Edwin Ashworth
Nov 14 '17 at 23:54
It's a parenthetical phrase adding detail to the main clause. Initially placed parentheticals are normally set off by a comma.
– Edwin Ashworth
Nov 14 '17 at 23:54
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f418439%2fcomma-preceding-with-clause-at-end-of-sentence%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown