Resolution of a torsion sheaf
up vote
5
down vote
favorite
Let $J$ be the hyperplane divisor in $mathbb{C}P^2$, and let $i:C hookrightarrow mathbb{C}P^2$ be the closed immersion of a smooth generic curve of degree 2. We know that $Csimeq mathbb{C}P^1$, and let $H$ be the hyperplane divisor in $C$. So loosely $H sim frac{1}{2}J|_C$. The question is, what is the projective (locally free) resolution of $i_* mathcal{O}_C(H)$? in other words, we have the following resolution in general,
begin{equation}
0longrightarrow mathcal{L}_2longrightarrowmathcal{L_1}longrightarrowmathcal{L}_0longrightarrow i_* mathcal{O}_C(H) longrightarrow 0,
end{equation}
what are the locally free sheaves $mathcal{L}_i$?
ag.algebraic-geometry projective-resolution
add a comment |
up vote
5
down vote
favorite
Let $J$ be the hyperplane divisor in $mathbb{C}P^2$, and let $i:C hookrightarrow mathbb{C}P^2$ be the closed immersion of a smooth generic curve of degree 2. We know that $Csimeq mathbb{C}P^1$, and let $H$ be the hyperplane divisor in $C$. So loosely $H sim frac{1}{2}J|_C$. The question is, what is the projective (locally free) resolution of $i_* mathcal{O}_C(H)$? in other words, we have the following resolution in general,
begin{equation}
0longrightarrow mathcal{L}_2longrightarrowmathcal{L_1}longrightarrowmathcal{L}_0longrightarrow i_* mathcal{O}_C(H) longrightarrow 0,
end{equation}
what are the locally free sheaves $mathcal{L}_i$?
ag.algebraic-geometry projective-resolution
It is possible to put some topological constraints on $mathcal{L}_i$'s, but I'm curious to see whether it is possible to say more....
– Mohsen Karkheiran
Dec 3 at 5:24
add a comment |
up vote
5
down vote
favorite
up vote
5
down vote
favorite
Let $J$ be the hyperplane divisor in $mathbb{C}P^2$, and let $i:C hookrightarrow mathbb{C}P^2$ be the closed immersion of a smooth generic curve of degree 2. We know that $Csimeq mathbb{C}P^1$, and let $H$ be the hyperplane divisor in $C$. So loosely $H sim frac{1}{2}J|_C$. The question is, what is the projective (locally free) resolution of $i_* mathcal{O}_C(H)$? in other words, we have the following resolution in general,
begin{equation}
0longrightarrow mathcal{L}_2longrightarrowmathcal{L_1}longrightarrowmathcal{L}_0longrightarrow i_* mathcal{O}_C(H) longrightarrow 0,
end{equation}
what are the locally free sheaves $mathcal{L}_i$?
ag.algebraic-geometry projective-resolution
Let $J$ be the hyperplane divisor in $mathbb{C}P^2$, and let $i:C hookrightarrow mathbb{C}P^2$ be the closed immersion of a smooth generic curve of degree 2. We know that $Csimeq mathbb{C}P^1$, and let $H$ be the hyperplane divisor in $C$. So loosely $H sim frac{1}{2}J|_C$. The question is, what is the projective (locally free) resolution of $i_* mathcal{O}_C(H)$? in other words, we have the following resolution in general,
begin{equation}
0longrightarrow mathcal{L}_2longrightarrowmathcal{L_1}longrightarrowmathcal{L}_0longrightarrow i_* mathcal{O}_C(H) longrightarrow 0,
end{equation}
what are the locally free sheaves $mathcal{L}_i$?
ag.algebraic-geometry projective-resolution
ag.algebraic-geometry projective-resolution
asked Dec 3 at 5:21
Mohsen Karkheiran
18910
18910
It is possible to put some topological constraints on $mathcal{L}_i$'s, but I'm curious to see whether it is possible to say more....
– Mohsen Karkheiran
Dec 3 at 5:24
add a comment |
It is possible to put some topological constraints on $mathcal{L}_i$'s, but I'm curious to see whether it is possible to say more....
– Mohsen Karkheiran
Dec 3 at 5:24
It is possible to put some topological constraints on $mathcal{L}_i$'s, but I'm curious to see whether it is possible to say more....
– Mohsen Karkheiran
Dec 3 at 5:24
It is possible to put some topological constraints on $mathcal{L}_i$'s, but I'm curious to see whether it is possible to say more....
– Mohsen Karkheiran
Dec 3 at 5:24
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
8
down vote
accepted
Write the equation of $C$ as $ XY-Z^2=0$, and consider the homomorphism $u: mathcal{O}_{mathbb{P}^2}(-1)^2rightarrow mathcal{O}_{mathbb{P}^2}^2$ given by the matrix $begin{pmatrix}
X & Z\Z& Y
end{pmatrix}$. It is invertible outside $C$, and has rank 1 at every point of $C$. Thus $u$ is injective, and its cokernel is $i_*L$, where $L$ is a line bundle on $C$. The exact sequence $0rightarrow mathcal{O}_{mathbb{P}^2}(-1)^2xrightarrow{ u } mathcal{O}_{mathbb{P}^2}^2rightarrow i_*Lrightarrow 0 $ gives $h^0(L)= 2$, thus $L=mathcal{O}_C(H)$, and this exact sequence gives the resolution you are asking for.
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
8
down vote
accepted
Write the equation of $C$ as $ XY-Z^2=0$, and consider the homomorphism $u: mathcal{O}_{mathbb{P}^2}(-1)^2rightarrow mathcal{O}_{mathbb{P}^2}^2$ given by the matrix $begin{pmatrix}
X & Z\Z& Y
end{pmatrix}$. It is invertible outside $C$, and has rank 1 at every point of $C$. Thus $u$ is injective, and its cokernel is $i_*L$, where $L$ is a line bundle on $C$. The exact sequence $0rightarrow mathcal{O}_{mathbb{P}^2}(-1)^2xrightarrow{ u } mathcal{O}_{mathbb{P}^2}^2rightarrow i_*Lrightarrow 0 $ gives $h^0(L)= 2$, thus $L=mathcal{O}_C(H)$, and this exact sequence gives the resolution you are asking for.
add a comment |
up vote
8
down vote
accepted
Write the equation of $C$ as $ XY-Z^2=0$, and consider the homomorphism $u: mathcal{O}_{mathbb{P}^2}(-1)^2rightarrow mathcal{O}_{mathbb{P}^2}^2$ given by the matrix $begin{pmatrix}
X & Z\Z& Y
end{pmatrix}$. It is invertible outside $C$, and has rank 1 at every point of $C$. Thus $u$ is injective, and its cokernel is $i_*L$, where $L$ is a line bundle on $C$. The exact sequence $0rightarrow mathcal{O}_{mathbb{P}^2}(-1)^2xrightarrow{ u } mathcal{O}_{mathbb{P}^2}^2rightarrow i_*Lrightarrow 0 $ gives $h^0(L)= 2$, thus $L=mathcal{O}_C(H)$, and this exact sequence gives the resolution you are asking for.
add a comment |
up vote
8
down vote
accepted
up vote
8
down vote
accepted
Write the equation of $C$ as $ XY-Z^2=0$, and consider the homomorphism $u: mathcal{O}_{mathbb{P}^2}(-1)^2rightarrow mathcal{O}_{mathbb{P}^2}^2$ given by the matrix $begin{pmatrix}
X & Z\Z& Y
end{pmatrix}$. It is invertible outside $C$, and has rank 1 at every point of $C$. Thus $u$ is injective, and its cokernel is $i_*L$, where $L$ is a line bundle on $C$. The exact sequence $0rightarrow mathcal{O}_{mathbb{P}^2}(-1)^2xrightarrow{ u } mathcal{O}_{mathbb{P}^2}^2rightarrow i_*Lrightarrow 0 $ gives $h^0(L)= 2$, thus $L=mathcal{O}_C(H)$, and this exact sequence gives the resolution you are asking for.
Write the equation of $C$ as $ XY-Z^2=0$, and consider the homomorphism $u: mathcal{O}_{mathbb{P}^2}(-1)^2rightarrow mathcal{O}_{mathbb{P}^2}^2$ given by the matrix $begin{pmatrix}
X & Z\Z& Y
end{pmatrix}$. It is invertible outside $C$, and has rank 1 at every point of $C$. Thus $u$ is injective, and its cokernel is $i_*L$, where $L$ is a line bundle on $C$. The exact sequence $0rightarrow mathcal{O}_{mathbb{P}^2}(-1)^2xrightarrow{ u } mathcal{O}_{mathbb{P}^2}^2rightarrow i_*Lrightarrow 0 $ gives $h^0(L)= 2$, thus $L=mathcal{O}_C(H)$, and this exact sequence gives the resolution you are asking for.
answered Dec 3 at 6:24
abx
22.8k34681
22.8k34681
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to MathOverflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f316756%2fresolution-of-a-torsion-sheaf%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
It is possible to put some topological constraints on $mathcal{L}_i$'s, but I'm curious to see whether it is possible to say more....
– Mohsen Karkheiran
Dec 3 at 5:24