What is the plural form of 'Achilles(Achilles tendon)'?












4














In Oxford Learner's Dictionary, under Achilles tendon, it says that




  • Achilles tendon = Achilles


Then the plural of 'Achilles tendon' is 'Achilles tendons'.



But, what is the plural form of "Achilles"?










share|improve this question







New contributor




west wind is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

























    4














    In Oxford Learner's Dictionary, under Achilles tendon, it says that




    • Achilles tendon = Achilles


    Then the plural of 'Achilles tendon' is 'Achilles tendons'.



    But, what is the plural form of "Achilles"?










    share|improve this question







    New contributor




    west wind is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.























      4












      4








      4


      1





      In Oxford Learner's Dictionary, under Achilles tendon, it says that




      • Achilles tendon = Achilles


      Then the plural of 'Achilles tendon' is 'Achilles tendons'.



      But, what is the plural form of "Achilles"?










      share|improve this question







      New contributor




      west wind is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      In Oxford Learner's Dictionary, under Achilles tendon, it says that




      • Achilles tendon = Achilles


      Then the plural of 'Achilles tendon' is 'Achilles tendons'.



      But, what is the plural form of "Achilles"?







      grammar






      share|improve this question







      New contributor




      west wind is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|improve this question







      New contributor




      west wind is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question






      New contributor




      west wind is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked Dec 15 at 14:55









      west wind

      232




      232




      New contributor




      west wind is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      west wind is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      west wind is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          5














          Why should you want "the plural of Achilles"? Nouns (common or proper) used as the non-final element of compounds don't usually take a plural ending; and if they do, they always take it. They don't change when the whole phrase is plural:




          kitchen unit -> kitchen units.



          cable provider -> cable providers.




          and




          glasses case -> glasses cases.




          If you really want to talk about more than one Achilles, then most people would say "Achilleses", but people often aren't sure how to write it. I suspect some people would say "two Achilles" (like "two series").






          share|improve this answer





























            2














            Google finds around a dozen hits for "two achilles are", and only one for "two achilleses are". So I would say the consensus is that the plural of Achilles is Achilles.



            However pluralizing achilles is so rare that I assume most people who do it aren't copying the plural form from things they've heard, but coming up with it de novo. So I would be very heistant to call achilleses wrong.






            share|improve this answer

















            • 2




              Perhaps it's because words ending in unstressed /iz/ already "sound" plural: fillies, axis>axes, basis>bases, crisis>crises, Kingdom of the Two Sicilies, gives me the willies.
              – tchrist
              Dec 15 at 19:03










            • @tchrist: that's probably why. And two additional words: species>species and series>series.
              – Peter Shor
              Dec 16 at 16:21










            • Be­sides those two you note from Latin’s 5ᵗʰ-de­clen­sion, other ex­am­ples in­vari­ant in the plu­ral be­cause of al­ready end­ing in un­stressed /iːz/ (UK) or /iz/ (US) are Pekinese for the dog and Si­amese for the cat. As far as I can dis­cern, ᴀʟʟ -ese de­monyms and lo­gonyms end­ing in un­stressed /iz/ strongly re­sist (block?) fur­ther /ǝz/ in­flec­tions, whether to make them plu­ral or to make them pos­ses­sive. Same with Mercedes be­ing in­vari­ant, be it car make or wom­an’s name. That’s why I be­lieve these all op­er­ate un­der some kind of un­taught sound law.
              – tchrist
              Dec 16 at 17:34













            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "97"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });






            west wind is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f477220%2fwhat-is-the-plural-form-of-achillesachilles-tendon%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            5














            Why should you want "the plural of Achilles"? Nouns (common or proper) used as the non-final element of compounds don't usually take a plural ending; and if they do, they always take it. They don't change when the whole phrase is plural:




            kitchen unit -> kitchen units.



            cable provider -> cable providers.




            and




            glasses case -> glasses cases.




            If you really want to talk about more than one Achilles, then most people would say "Achilleses", but people often aren't sure how to write it. I suspect some people would say "two Achilles" (like "two series").






            share|improve this answer


























              5














              Why should you want "the plural of Achilles"? Nouns (common or proper) used as the non-final element of compounds don't usually take a plural ending; and if they do, they always take it. They don't change when the whole phrase is plural:




              kitchen unit -> kitchen units.



              cable provider -> cable providers.




              and




              glasses case -> glasses cases.




              If you really want to talk about more than one Achilles, then most people would say "Achilleses", but people often aren't sure how to write it. I suspect some people would say "two Achilles" (like "two series").






              share|improve this answer
























                5












                5








                5






                Why should you want "the plural of Achilles"? Nouns (common or proper) used as the non-final element of compounds don't usually take a plural ending; and if they do, they always take it. They don't change when the whole phrase is plural:




                kitchen unit -> kitchen units.



                cable provider -> cable providers.




                and




                glasses case -> glasses cases.




                If you really want to talk about more than one Achilles, then most people would say "Achilleses", but people often aren't sure how to write it. I suspect some people would say "two Achilles" (like "two series").






                share|improve this answer












                Why should you want "the plural of Achilles"? Nouns (common or proper) used as the non-final element of compounds don't usually take a plural ending; and if they do, they always take it. They don't change when the whole phrase is plural:




                kitchen unit -> kitchen units.



                cable provider -> cable providers.




                and




                glasses case -> glasses cases.




                If you really want to talk about more than one Achilles, then most people would say "Achilleses", but people often aren't sure how to write it. I suspect some people would say "two Achilles" (like "two series").







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered Dec 15 at 15:21









                Colin Fine

                63.6k170160




                63.6k170160

























                    2














                    Google finds around a dozen hits for "two achilles are", and only one for "two achilleses are". So I would say the consensus is that the plural of Achilles is Achilles.



                    However pluralizing achilles is so rare that I assume most people who do it aren't copying the plural form from things they've heard, but coming up with it de novo. So I would be very heistant to call achilleses wrong.






                    share|improve this answer

















                    • 2




                      Perhaps it's because words ending in unstressed /iz/ already "sound" plural: fillies, axis>axes, basis>bases, crisis>crises, Kingdom of the Two Sicilies, gives me the willies.
                      – tchrist
                      Dec 15 at 19:03










                    • @tchrist: that's probably why. And two additional words: species>species and series>series.
                      – Peter Shor
                      Dec 16 at 16:21










                    • Be­sides those two you note from Latin’s 5ᵗʰ-de­clen­sion, other ex­am­ples in­vari­ant in the plu­ral be­cause of al­ready end­ing in un­stressed /iːz/ (UK) or /iz/ (US) are Pekinese for the dog and Si­amese for the cat. As far as I can dis­cern, ᴀʟʟ -ese de­monyms and lo­gonyms end­ing in un­stressed /iz/ strongly re­sist (block?) fur­ther /ǝz/ in­flec­tions, whether to make them plu­ral or to make them pos­ses­sive. Same with Mercedes be­ing in­vari­ant, be it car make or wom­an’s name. That’s why I be­lieve these all op­er­ate un­der some kind of un­taught sound law.
                      – tchrist
                      Dec 16 at 17:34


















                    2














                    Google finds around a dozen hits for "two achilles are", and only one for "two achilleses are". So I would say the consensus is that the plural of Achilles is Achilles.



                    However pluralizing achilles is so rare that I assume most people who do it aren't copying the plural form from things they've heard, but coming up with it de novo. So I would be very heistant to call achilleses wrong.






                    share|improve this answer

















                    • 2




                      Perhaps it's because words ending in unstressed /iz/ already "sound" plural: fillies, axis>axes, basis>bases, crisis>crises, Kingdom of the Two Sicilies, gives me the willies.
                      – tchrist
                      Dec 15 at 19:03










                    • @tchrist: that's probably why. And two additional words: species>species and series>series.
                      – Peter Shor
                      Dec 16 at 16:21










                    • Be­sides those two you note from Latin’s 5ᵗʰ-de­clen­sion, other ex­am­ples in­vari­ant in the plu­ral be­cause of al­ready end­ing in un­stressed /iːz/ (UK) or /iz/ (US) are Pekinese for the dog and Si­amese for the cat. As far as I can dis­cern, ᴀʟʟ -ese de­monyms and lo­gonyms end­ing in un­stressed /iz/ strongly re­sist (block?) fur­ther /ǝz/ in­flec­tions, whether to make them plu­ral or to make them pos­ses­sive. Same with Mercedes be­ing in­vari­ant, be it car make or wom­an’s name. That’s why I be­lieve these all op­er­ate un­der some kind of un­taught sound law.
                      – tchrist
                      Dec 16 at 17:34
















                    2












                    2








                    2






                    Google finds around a dozen hits for "two achilles are", and only one for "two achilleses are". So I would say the consensus is that the plural of Achilles is Achilles.



                    However pluralizing achilles is so rare that I assume most people who do it aren't copying the plural form from things they've heard, but coming up with it de novo. So I would be very heistant to call achilleses wrong.






                    share|improve this answer












                    Google finds around a dozen hits for "two achilles are", and only one for "two achilleses are". So I would say the consensus is that the plural of Achilles is Achilles.



                    However pluralizing achilles is so rare that I assume most people who do it aren't copying the plural form from things they've heard, but coming up with it de novo. So I would be very heistant to call achilleses wrong.







                    share|improve this answer












                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer










                    answered Dec 15 at 18:50









                    Peter Shor

                    61.6k5117220




                    61.6k5117220








                    • 2




                      Perhaps it's because words ending in unstressed /iz/ already "sound" plural: fillies, axis>axes, basis>bases, crisis>crises, Kingdom of the Two Sicilies, gives me the willies.
                      – tchrist
                      Dec 15 at 19:03










                    • @tchrist: that's probably why. And two additional words: species>species and series>series.
                      – Peter Shor
                      Dec 16 at 16:21










                    • Be­sides those two you note from Latin’s 5ᵗʰ-de­clen­sion, other ex­am­ples in­vari­ant in the plu­ral be­cause of al­ready end­ing in un­stressed /iːz/ (UK) or /iz/ (US) are Pekinese for the dog and Si­amese for the cat. As far as I can dis­cern, ᴀʟʟ -ese de­monyms and lo­gonyms end­ing in un­stressed /iz/ strongly re­sist (block?) fur­ther /ǝz/ in­flec­tions, whether to make them plu­ral or to make them pos­ses­sive. Same with Mercedes be­ing in­vari­ant, be it car make or wom­an’s name. That’s why I be­lieve these all op­er­ate un­der some kind of un­taught sound law.
                      – tchrist
                      Dec 16 at 17:34
















                    • 2




                      Perhaps it's because words ending in unstressed /iz/ already "sound" plural: fillies, axis>axes, basis>bases, crisis>crises, Kingdom of the Two Sicilies, gives me the willies.
                      – tchrist
                      Dec 15 at 19:03










                    • @tchrist: that's probably why. And two additional words: species>species and series>series.
                      – Peter Shor
                      Dec 16 at 16:21










                    • Be­sides those two you note from Latin’s 5ᵗʰ-de­clen­sion, other ex­am­ples in­vari­ant in the plu­ral be­cause of al­ready end­ing in un­stressed /iːz/ (UK) or /iz/ (US) are Pekinese for the dog and Si­amese for the cat. As far as I can dis­cern, ᴀʟʟ -ese de­monyms and lo­gonyms end­ing in un­stressed /iz/ strongly re­sist (block?) fur­ther /ǝz/ in­flec­tions, whether to make them plu­ral or to make them pos­ses­sive. Same with Mercedes be­ing in­vari­ant, be it car make or wom­an’s name. That’s why I be­lieve these all op­er­ate un­der some kind of un­taught sound law.
                      – tchrist
                      Dec 16 at 17:34










                    2




                    2




                    Perhaps it's because words ending in unstressed /iz/ already "sound" plural: fillies, axis>axes, basis>bases, crisis>crises, Kingdom of the Two Sicilies, gives me the willies.
                    – tchrist
                    Dec 15 at 19:03




                    Perhaps it's because words ending in unstressed /iz/ already "sound" plural: fillies, axis>axes, basis>bases, crisis>crises, Kingdom of the Two Sicilies, gives me the willies.
                    – tchrist
                    Dec 15 at 19:03












                    @tchrist: that's probably why. And two additional words: species>species and series>series.
                    – Peter Shor
                    Dec 16 at 16:21




                    @tchrist: that's probably why. And two additional words: species>species and series>series.
                    – Peter Shor
                    Dec 16 at 16:21












                    Be­sides those two you note from Latin’s 5ᵗʰ-de­clen­sion, other ex­am­ples in­vari­ant in the plu­ral be­cause of al­ready end­ing in un­stressed /iːz/ (UK) or /iz/ (US) are Pekinese for the dog and Si­amese for the cat. As far as I can dis­cern, ᴀʟʟ -ese de­monyms and lo­gonyms end­ing in un­stressed /iz/ strongly re­sist (block?) fur­ther /ǝz/ in­flec­tions, whether to make them plu­ral or to make them pos­ses­sive. Same with Mercedes be­ing in­vari­ant, be it car make or wom­an’s name. That’s why I be­lieve these all op­er­ate un­der some kind of un­taught sound law.
                    – tchrist
                    Dec 16 at 17:34






                    Be­sides those two you note from Latin’s 5ᵗʰ-de­clen­sion, other ex­am­ples in­vari­ant in the plu­ral be­cause of al­ready end­ing in un­stressed /iːz/ (UK) or /iz/ (US) are Pekinese for the dog and Si­amese for the cat. As far as I can dis­cern, ᴀʟʟ -ese de­monyms and lo­gonyms end­ing in un­stressed /iz/ strongly re­sist (block?) fur­ther /ǝz/ in­flec­tions, whether to make them plu­ral or to make them pos­ses­sive. Same with Mercedes be­ing in­vari­ant, be it car make or wom­an’s name. That’s why I be­lieve these all op­er­ate un­der some kind of un­taught sound law.
                    – tchrist
                    Dec 16 at 17:34












                    west wind is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










                    draft saved

                    draft discarded


















                    west wind is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













                    west wind is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                    west wind is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















                    Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                    Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                    Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f477220%2fwhat-is-the-plural-form-of-achillesachilles-tendon%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    數位音樂下載

                    When can things happen in Etherscan, such as the picture below?

                    格利澤436b