How to properly define scales note names for a scale that is not heptatonic












3















As far as I understand Scales are defined on intervals. So, for example, the major scale is defined by the following intervals from the root:



C - Root
D - Major Second
E - Major Third
F - Perfect Fourth
G - Perfect Fifth
A - Major Sixth
B - Major Seventh


This is perfectly clear to me, and it makes sense, because we have 7 note names, so every note must be included on the scale, but then when trying to figure out the proper name notes for an octatonic scale it becomes blurry to me. I mean when building an octatonic scale you only stack Tone-Semitone-Tone-Semitone...



But how do I properly define the Note names??



For the semitone spacing the interval could either be a augmented prime, a minor second, or even a doubly diminished third.



For the tone spacing the interval could be a doubly augmented prime, a major second or a diminished third.



How do I find the proper note names for non heptatonic scales?
Does the same rules apply for the chromatic scale?










share|improve this question



























    3















    As far as I understand Scales are defined on intervals. So, for example, the major scale is defined by the following intervals from the root:



    C - Root
    D - Major Second
    E - Major Third
    F - Perfect Fourth
    G - Perfect Fifth
    A - Major Sixth
    B - Major Seventh


    This is perfectly clear to me, and it makes sense, because we have 7 note names, so every note must be included on the scale, but then when trying to figure out the proper name notes for an octatonic scale it becomes blurry to me. I mean when building an octatonic scale you only stack Tone-Semitone-Tone-Semitone...



    But how do I properly define the Note names??



    For the semitone spacing the interval could either be a augmented prime, a minor second, or even a doubly diminished third.



    For the tone spacing the interval could be a doubly augmented prime, a major second or a diminished third.



    How do I find the proper note names for non heptatonic scales?
    Does the same rules apply for the chromatic scale?










    share|improve this question

























      3












      3








      3








      As far as I understand Scales are defined on intervals. So, for example, the major scale is defined by the following intervals from the root:



      C - Root
      D - Major Second
      E - Major Third
      F - Perfect Fourth
      G - Perfect Fifth
      A - Major Sixth
      B - Major Seventh


      This is perfectly clear to me, and it makes sense, because we have 7 note names, so every note must be included on the scale, but then when trying to figure out the proper name notes for an octatonic scale it becomes blurry to me. I mean when building an octatonic scale you only stack Tone-Semitone-Tone-Semitone...



      But how do I properly define the Note names??



      For the semitone spacing the interval could either be a augmented prime, a minor second, or even a doubly diminished third.



      For the tone spacing the interval could be a doubly augmented prime, a major second or a diminished third.



      How do I find the proper note names for non heptatonic scales?
      Does the same rules apply for the chromatic scale?










      share|improve this question














      As far as I understand Scales are defined on intervals. So, for example, the major scale is defined by the following intervals from the root:



      C - Root
      D - Major Second
      E - Major Third
      F - Perfect Fourth
      G - Perfect Fifth
      A - Major Sixth
      B - Major Seventh


      This is perfectly clear to me, and it makes sense, because we have 7 note names, so every note must be included on the scale, but then when trying to figure out the proper name notes for an octatonic scale it becomes blurry to me. I mean when building an octatonic scale you only stack Tone-Semitone-Tone-Semitone...



      But how do I properly define the Note names??



      For the semitone spacing the interval could either be a augmented prime, a minor second, or even a doubly diminished third.



      For the tone spacing the interval could be a doubly augmented prime, a major second or a diminished third.



      How do I find the proper note names for non heptatonic scales?
      Does the same rules apply for the chromatic scale?







      theory scales






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked 4 hours ago









      Cheche RomoCheche Romo

      1097




      1097






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3














          In heptatonic scales, we have one instance of each note name, because there are seven note names. But you're correct: if the scale doesn't have seven tones, some note names will need to be repeated or omitted.



          Octatonic ("diminished") scales have been addressed in Notating the diminished Scale



          The same stipulations discussed in that question apply in other non-heptatonic scales: some composers prefer to write exclusively with flats or sharps, and composers often aid our understanding of a tonal center by how pitches are spelled.



          But there's one additional stipulation that I can think of that applies to your question. Let's imagine we're writing a hexatonic scale, often understood as a half-step pattern of 3 1 3 1 3 1:



          enter image description here



          This looks like a great way to notate this, and it is: we have no repeated note names, and we only omit the F. This is what mathematicians might call a "maximally even" distribution of note names, meaning it's as evenly spread as possible, considering one note name must be missing.



          But let's look closer at this collection. It contains the following triads:




          CM
          Cm
          EM
          Em
          A♭M
          G♯m


          Sometimes, composers writing hexatonically like to highlight the juxtaposition of two harmonies. And if they want to highlight the mixture of, say, the C minor and E major triads (what we call hexatonic poles, because combined they create a hexatonic collection), a composer may well choose to notate this collection as:



          enter image description here



          Even though the two versions of E and G look awful, the notation makes clear the juxtaposition between the C minor and E major triads.



          In short: depending on the musical situation, some composers (though not all!) may choose to use notation that looks less than ideal because it illustrates the musical process more clearly.






          share|improve this answer























            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "240"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmusic.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f78707%2fhow-to-properly-define-scales-note-names-for-a-scale-that-is-not-heptatonic%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            3














            In heptatonic scales, we have one instance of each note name, because there are seven note names. But you're correct: if the scale doesn't have seven tones, some note names will need to be repeated or omitted.



            Octatonic ("diminished") scales have been addressed in Notating the diminished Scale



            The same stipulations discussed in that question apply in other non-heptatonic scales: some composers prefer to write exclusively with flats or sharps, and composers often aid our understanding of a tonal center by how pitches are spelled.



            But there's one additional stipulation that I can think of that applies to your question. Let's imagine we're writing a hexatonic scale, often understood as a half-step pattern of 3 1 3 1 3 1:



            enter image description here



            This looks like a great way to notate this, and it is: we have no repeated note names, and we only omit the F. This is what mathematicians might call a "maximally even" distribution of note names, meaning it's as evenly spread as possible, considering one note name must be missing.



            But let's look closer at this collection. It contains the following triads:




            CM
            Cm
            EM
            Em
            A♭M
            G♯m


            Sometimes, composers writing hexatonically like to highlight the juxtaposition of two harmonies. And if they want to highlight the mixture of, say, the C minor and E major triads (what we call hexatonic poles, because combined they create a hexatonic collection), a composer may well choose to notate this collection as:



            enter image description here



            Even though the two versions of E and G look awful, the notation makes clear the juxtaposition between the C minor and E major triads.



            In short: depending on the musical situation, some composers (though not all!) may choose to use notation that looks less than ideal because it illustrates the musical process more clearly.






            share|improve this answer




























              3














              In heptatonic scales, we have one instance of each note name, because there are seven note names. But you're correct: if the scale doesn't have seven tones, some note names will need to be repeated or omitted.



              Octatonic ("diminished") scales have been addressed in Notating the diminished Scale



              The same stipulations discussed in that question apply in other non-heptatonic scales: some composers prefer to write exclusively with flats or sharps, and composers often aid our understanding of a tonal center by how pitches are spelled.



              But there's one additional stipulation that I can think of that applies to your question. Let's imagine we're writing a hexatonic scale, often understood as a half-step pattern of 3 1 3 1 3 1:



              enter image description here



              This looks like a great way to notate this, and it is: we have no repeated note names, and we only omit the F. This is what mathematicians might call a "maximally even" distribution of note names, meaning it's as evenly spread as possible, considering one note name must be missing.



              But let's look closer at this collection. It contains the following triads:




              CM
              Cm
              EM
              Em
              A♭M
              G♯m


              Sometimes, composers writing hexatonically like to highlight the juxtaposition of two harmonies. And if they want to highlight the mixture of, say, the C minor and E major triads (what we call hexatonic poles, because combined they create a hexatonic collection), a composer may well choose to notate this collection as:



              enter image description here



              Even though the two versions of E and G look awful, the notation makes clear the juxtaposition between the C minor and E major triads.



              In short: depending on the musical situation, some composers (though not all!) may choose to use notation that looks less than ideal because it illustrates the musical process more clearly.






              share|improve this answer


























                3












                3








                3







                In heptatonic scales, we have one instance of each note name, because there are seven note names. But you're correct: if the scale doesn't have seven tones, some note names will need to be repeated or omitted.



                Octatonic ("diminished") scales have been addressed in Notating the diminished Scale



                The same stipulations discussed in that question apply in other non-heptatonic scales: some composers prefer to write exclusively with flats or sharps, and composers often aid our understanding of a tonal center by how pitches are spelled.



                But there's one additional stipulation that I can think of that applies to your question. Let's imagine we're writing a hexatonic scale, often understood as a half-step pattern of 3 1 3 1 3 1:



                enter image description here



                This looks like a great way to notate this, and it is: we have no repeated note names, and we only omit the F. This is what mathematicians might call a "maximally even" distribution of note names, meaning it's as evenly spread as possible, considering one note name must be missing.



                But let's look closer at this collection. It contains the following triads:




                CM
                Cm
                EM
                Em
                A♭M
                G♯m


                Sometimes, composers writing hexatonically like to highlight the juxtaposition of two harmonies. And if they want to highlight the mixture of, say, the C minor and E major triads (what we call hexatonic poles, because combined they create a hexatonic collection), a composer may well choose to notate this collection as:



                enter image description here



                Even though the two versions of E and G look awful, the notation makes clear the juxtaposition between the C minor and E major triads.



                In short: depending on the musical situation, some composers (though not all!) may choose to use notation that looks less than ideal because it illustrates the musical process more clearly.






                share|improve this answer













                In heptatonic scales, we have one instance of each note name, because there are seven note names. But you're correct: if the scale doesn't have seven tones, some note names will need to be repeated or omitted.



                Octatonic ("diminished") scales have been addressed in Notating the diminished Scale



                The same stipulations discussed in that question apply in other non-heptatonic scales: some composers prefer to write exclusively with flats or sharps, and composers often aid our understanding of a tonal center by how pitches are spelled.



                But there's one additional stipulation that I can think of that applies to your question. Let's imagine we're writing a hexatonic scale, often understood as a half-step pattern of 3 1 3 1 3 1:



                enter image description here



                This looks like a great way to notate this, and it is: we have no repeated note names, and we only omit the F. This is what mathematicians might call a "maximally even" distribution of note names, meaning it's as evenly spread as possible, considering one note name must be missing.



                But let's look closer at this collection. It contains the following triads:




                CM
                Cm
                EM
                Em
                A♭M
                G♯m


                Sometimes, composers writing hexatonically like to highlight the juxtaposition of two harmonies. And if they want to highlight the mixture of, say, the C minor and E major triads (what we call hexatonic poles, because combined they create a hexatonic collection), a composer may well choose to notate this collection as:



                enter image description here



                Even though the two versions of E and G look awful, the notation makes clear the juxtaposition between the C minor and E major triads.



                In short: depending on the musical situation, some composers (though not all!) may choose to use notation that looks less than ideal because it illustrates the musical process more clearly.







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered 4 hours ago









                RichardRichard

                39.1k688168




                39.1k688168






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Music: Practice & Theory Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmusic.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f78707%2fhow-to-properly-define-scales-note-names-for-a-scale-that-is-not-heptatonic%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    數位音樂下載

                    格利澤436b

                    When can things happen in Etherscan, such as the picture below?