How to choose the default gcc and g++ version?











up vote
178
down vote

favorite
138












So I have installed gcc-4.4 and gcc-4.3 (same for g++). Now as far as I remember there is a tool in Ubuntu which sets the symlinks for you if you just tell it which version you want. However it does not seem to work in the newest version, which I find disappointing.



root@nexus:~# update-alternatives --config gcc
update-alternatives: error: no alternatives for gcc.
root@nexus:~# update-alternatives --config cc
There is only one alternative in link group cc: /usr/bin/gcc
Nothing to configure.


root@nexus:~# dpkg -l | grep gcc | awk '{print $2}'
gcc
gcc-4.3
gcc-4.3-base
gcc-4.3-multilib
gcc-4.4
gcc-4.4-base
gcc-4.4-multilib
gcc-4.5-base
gcc-multilib
lib32gcc1
libgcc1


Any ideas?










share|improve this question




















  • 1




    As @Oli explained, this is a bad idea. Debian-devel mail list: "I don't think alternatives should be used for versioning. For example, we don't use alternatives for gcc, neither for Python." lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2014/06/msg00381.html
    – hmijail
    Aug 18 '16 at 20:39










  • OK, so what do you use for versioning?
    – WillC
    Nov 28 at 8:34















up vote
178
down vote

favorite
138












So I have installed gcc-4.4 and gcc-4.3 (same for g++). Now as far as I remember there is a tool in Ubuntu which sets the symlinks for you if you just tell it which version you want. However it does not seem to work in the newest version, which I find disappointing.



root@nexus:~# update-alternatives --config gcc
update-alternatives: error: no alternatives for gcc.
root@nexus:~# update-alternatives --config cc
There is only one alternative in link group cc: /usr/bin/gcc
Nothing to configure.


root@nexus:~# dpkg -l | grep gcc | awk '{print $2}'
gcc
gcc-4.3
gcc-4.3-base
gcc-4.3-multilib
gcc-4.4
gcc-4.4-base
gcc-4.4-multilib
gcc-4.5-base
gcc-multilib
lib32gcc1
libgcc1


Any ideas?










share|improve this question




















  • 1




    As @Oli explained, this is a bad idea. Debian-devel mail list: "I don't think alternatives should be used for versioning. For example, we don't use alternatives for gcc, neither for Python." lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2014/06/msg00381.html
    – hmijail
    Aug 18 '16 at 20:39










  • OK, so what do you use for versioning?
    – WillC
    Nov 28 at 8:34













up vote
178
down vote

favorite
138









up vote
178
down vote

favorite
138






138





So I have installed gcc-4.4 and gcc-4.3 (same for g++). Now as far as I remember there is a tool in Ubuntu which sets the symlinks for you if you just tell it which version you want. However it does not seem to work in the newest version, which I find disappointing.



root@nexus:~# update-alternatives --config gcc
update-alternatives: error: no alternatives for gcc.
root@nexus:~# update-alternatives --config cc
There is only one alternative in link group cc: /usr/bin/gcc
Nothing to configure.


root@nexus:~# dpkg -l | grep gcc | awk '{print $2}'
gcc
gcc-4.3
gcc-4.3-base
gcc-4.3-multilib
gcc-4.4
gcc-4.4-base
gcc-4.4-multilib
gcc-4.5-base
gcc-multilib
lib32gcc1
libgcc1


Any ideas?










share|improve this question















So I have installed gcc-4.4 and gcc-4.3 (same for g++). Now as far as I remember there is a tool in Ubuntu which sets the symlinks for you if you just tell it which version you want. However it does not seem to work in the newest version, which I find disappointing.



root@nexus:~# update-alternatives --config gcc
update-alternatives: error: no alternatives for gcc.
root@nexus:~# update-alternatives --config cc
There is only one alternative in link group cc: /usr/bin/gcc
Nothing to configure.


root@nexus:~# dpkg -l | grep gcc | awk '{print $2}'
gcc
gcc-4.3
gcc-4.3-base
gcc-4.3-multilib
gcc-4.4
gcc-4.4-base
gcc-4.4-multilib
gcc-4.5-base
gcc-multilib
lib32gcc1
libgcc1


Any ideas?







gcc g++






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited May 30 at 8:59









Ciro Santilli 新疆改造中心 六四事件 法轮功

9,05444246




9,05444246










asked Feb 15 '11 at 15:52









Nils

1,051389




1,051389








  • 1




    As @Oli explained, this is a bad idea. Debian-devel mail list: "I don't think alternatives should be used for versioning. For example, we don't use alternatives for gcc, neither for Python." lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2014/06/msg00381.html
    – hmijail
    Aug 18 '16 at 20:39










  • OK, so what do you use for versioning?
    – WillC
    Nov 28 at 8:34














  • 1




    As @Oli explained, this is a bad idea. Debian-devel mail list: "I don't think alternatives should be used for versioning. For example, we don't use alternatives for gcc, neither for Python." lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2014/06/msg00381.html
    – hmijail
    Aug 18 '16 at 20:39










  • OK, so what do you use for versioning?
    – WillC
    Nov 28 at 8:34








1




1




As @Oli explained, this is a bad idea. Debian-devel mail list: "I don't think alternatives should be used for versioning. For example, we don't use alternatives for gcc, neither for Python." lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2014/06/msg00381.html
– hmijail
Aug 18 '16 at 20:39




As @Oli explained, this is a bad idea. Debian-devel mail list: "I don't think alternatives should be used for versioning. For example, we don't use alternatives for gcc, neither for Python." lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2014/06/msg00381.html
– hmijail
Aug 18 '16 at 20:39












OK, so what do you use for versioning?
– WillC
Nov 28 at 8:34




OK, so what do you use for versioning?
– WillC
Nov 28 at 8:34










6 Answers
6






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
238
down vote



accepted










First erased the current update-alternatives setup for gcc and g++:



sudo update-alternatives --remove-all gcc 
sudo update-alternatives --remove-all g++


Install Packages



It seems that both gcc-4.3 and gcc-4.4 are installed after install build-essential. However, we can explicitly install the following packages:



sudo apt-get install gcc-4.3 gcc-4.4 g++-4.3 g++-4.4


Install Alternatives



Symbolic links cc and c++ are installed by default. We will install symbol links for gcc and g++, then link cc and c++ to gcc and g++ respectively.



sudo update-alternatives --install /usr/bin/gcc gcc /usr/bin/gcc-4.3 10
sudo update-alternatives --install /usr/bin/gcc gcc /usr/bin/gcc-4.4 20

sudo update-alternatives --install /usr/bin/g++ g++ /usr/bin/g++-4.3 10
sudo update-alternatives --install /usr/bin/g++ g++ /usr/bin/g++-4.4 20

sudo update-alternatives --install /usr/bin/cc cc /usr/bin/gcc 30
sudo update-alternatives --set cc /usr/bin/gcc

sudo update-alternatives --install /usr/bin/c++ c++ /usr/bin/g++ 30
sudo update-alternatives --set c++ /usr/bin/g++


Configure Alternatives



The last step is configuring the default commands for gcc, g++. It's easy to switch between 4.3 and 4.4 interactively:



sudo update-alternatives --config gcc
sudo update-alternatives --config g++


Or switch using script:



#!/bin/sh

if [ -z "$1" ]; then
echo "usage: $0 version" 1>&2
exit 1
fi

if [ ! -f "/usr/bin/gcc-$1" ] || [ ! -f "/usr/bin/g++-$1" ]; then
echo "no such version gcc/g++ installed" 1>&2
exit 1
fi

update-alternatives --set gcc "/usr/bin/gcc-$1"
update-alternatives --set g++ "/usr/bin/g++-$1"





share|improve this answer



















  • 4




    Thx, so you have to add them manually to update-alternatives.. IIRC earlier Ubuntu versions did that automatically.
    – Nils
    Feb 15 '11 at 19:33










  • This is especially useful to me when compiling nvidia modules for different kernels. Thank you so much for explaining update-alternatives
    – earthmeLon
    Apr 15 '12 at 10:57






  • 1




    Thank you! I used your other answer to update from 4.6 to 4.7. I wanted to use this answer, but I was not sure why do you put numbers like 10 20 30 after some of you commands. Could you please explain?
    – Martin Drozdik
    Dec 28 '12 at 22:02






  • 7




    The numbers are priorities as it turns out, according to the manpage. I imagine in the case that one of the version is uninstalled it will use those priorities to determine which one should become the new default.
    – Ibrahim
    Jan 14 '13 at 20:04






  • 1




    @Ibrahim: No, they determine what gets chosen when you select auto mode
    – Cookie
    Mar 24 '14 at 16:25


















up vote
33
down vote













execute in terminal :



gcc -v
g++ -v


Okay, so that part is fairly simple. The tricky part is that when you issue the command GCC it is actually a sybolic link to which ever version of GCC you are using. What this means is we can create a symbolic link from GCC to whichever version of GCC we want.




  • You can see the symbolic link :



ls -la /usr/bin | grep gcc-4.4
ls -la /usr/bin | grep g++-4.4




  • So what we need to do is remove the GCC symlink and the G++ symlink and then recreate them linked to GCC 4.3 and G++ 4.3:



rm /usr/bin/gcc
rm /usr/bin/g++

ln -s /usr/bin/gcc-4.3 /usr/bin/gcc
ln -s /usr/bin/g++-4.3 /usr/bin/g++




  • Now if we check the symbolic links again we will see GCC & G++ are now linked to GCC 4.3 and G++ 4.3:



ls -la /usr/bin/ | grep gcc
ls -la /usr/bin/ | grep g++




  • Finally we can check our GCC -v again and make sure we are using the correct version:



gcc -v
g++ -v






share|improve this answer






























    up vote
    20
    down vote













    Is this really desirable? There are ABI changes between gcc versions. Compiling something with one version (eg the entire operating system) and then compiling something else with another version, can cause conflict.



    For example, kernel modules should always be compiled with the same version of gcc used to compile the kernel. With that in mind, if you manually altered the symlink between /usr/bin/gcc and the version used in your version of Ubuntu, future DKMS-built modules might use the wrong gcc version.



    If you just want to build things with a different version of gcc, that's easy enough, even with makescripts. For example, you can pass in the version of gcc in the CC environment variable:



    CC="gcc-4.5" ./configure
    CC="gcc-4.5" make


    You might not need it on the make command (configure scripts usually pull it in) but it doesn't hurt.






    share|improve this answer





















    • Thx for your comment. I'm aware of the CC variable, but this was not really the question.
      – Nils
      Feb 15 '11 at 16:31






    • 2




      True enough but I have explained why gcc isn't part of the alternatives system and why this isn't particularly desirable. If neither of those are going to change your mind, just do it manually.
      – Oli
      Feb 15 '11 at 16:43










    • It was before? Now they just removed it?! Compiling (userspace) software with different gcc versions should be perfectly ok.. this discussion is getting sill..
      – Nils
      Feb 15 '11 at 18:12










    • Can you explain why per-invocation environment variables are preferable to a system-wide configuration setting? $ sudo apt-get install gcc-6 gcc-7 $ CC="gcc-7" ./configure <much output> $ make # uses gcc-7 Whereas sudo update-alternatives gcc gcc-7 would have made sure that you don't accidentally switch ABIs.
      – kfsone
      Jun 12 '17 at 22:01




















    up vote
    10
    down vote













    Edit:



    This assumes that you have installed the version first, with e.g.:



    sudo apt install gcc-4.9 g++-4.9


    Original:



    And here is a one-liner for those who are lazy, just change change the number at the end to the version you want. It will make the change for gcc and/or g++



    ls -la /usr/bin/ | grep -oP "[S]*(gcc|g++)(-[a-z]+)*[s]" | xargs bash -c 'for link in ${@:1}; do sudo ln -s -f "/usr/bin/${link}-${0}" "/usr/bin/${link}"; done' 4.9


    In this example I switched to 4.9



    There are no error checks and what not in this example, so you might want to check what will be run before you run it. Just add echo before sudo. For completeness I provide check line as well:



    ls -la /usr/bin/ | grep -oP "[S]*(gcc|g++)(-[a-z]+)*[s]" | xargs bash -c 'for link in ${@:1}; do echo sudo ln -s -f "/usr/bin/${link}-${0}" "/usr/bin/${link}"; done' 4.9


    The output from the check should be something like:



    sudo ln -s -f /usr/bin/g++-4.9 /usr/bin/g++
    sudo ln -s -f /usr/bin/gcc-4.9 /usr/bin/gcc
    sudo ln -s -f /usr/bin/gcc-ar-4.9 /usr/bin/gcc-ar
    sudo ln -s -f /usr/bin/gcc-nm-4.9 /usr/bin/gcc-nm
    sudo ln -s -f /usr/bin/gcc-ranlib-4.9 /usr/bin/gcc-ranlib
    sudo ln -s -f /usr/bin/x86_64-linux-gnu-g++-4.9 /usr/bin/x86_64-linux-gnu-g++
    sudo ln -s -f /usr/bin/x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc-4.9 /usr/bin/x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc
    sudo ln -s -f /usr/bin/x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc-ar-4.9 /usr/bin/x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc-ar
    sudo ln -s -f /usr/bin/x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc-nm-4.9 /usr/bin/x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc-nm
    sudo ln -s -f /usr/bin/x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc-ranlib-4.9 /usr/bin/x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc-ranlib


    You can check the version after with:



    gcc --version


    Semi-detailed explanation:





    • ls -la /usr/bin/ lists all files in /usr/bin


    • | pipe (send) the output to the next command


    • grep -oP matches the search regex per line. o only shows the result not the entire matched line. P tells grep to use perl-regex. I will not go into regex here, read up on it if you want to.


    • xargs simply put, it gathers the results that are piped to it and send all of them to the end. i.e. to the command following xargs


    • bash well, it's bash. The c flag tells it to use the string as a command. In this example it loops over the arguments sent from xargs by skipping the first (0th) argument, in this case the loop skips 4.9. The 0th argument is used in the loop to change the link.


    • ln -s -f The s flag makes a symbolic link, f forces unlinking first if needed.






    share|improve this answer



















    • 1




      Very old question, but this answer seems to be one of the gems we should look for when reviewing answers to old posts...
      – mook765
      Oct 16 '16 at 7:12










    • Brilliant! Best answer hands down!
      – Gabriel Staples
      Jan 15 at 4:04


















    up vote
    0
    down vote













    Consider one way upgrade:




    • sudo apt install gcc-7

    • sudo apt remove gcc-5


    apt will handle links staff automatically in this case. New C/C++ version is pretty compatible. You hardly would ever need old one.






    share|improve this answer






























      up vote
      0
      down vote













      How about a symbolic link in a temporary directory:




      mkdir x && PATH=$PWD/x:$PATH && ln -s /usr/bin/g++-7 $PWD/x/g++






      share|improve this answer





















        Your Answer








        StackExchange.ready(function() {
        var channelOptions = {
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "89"
        };
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
        createEditor();
        });
        }
        else {
        createEditor();
        }
        });

        function createEditor() {
        StackExchange.prepareEditor({
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        convertImagesToLinks: true,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: 10,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader: {
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        },
        onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        });


        }
        });














        draft saved

        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function () {
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f26498%2fhow-to-choose-the-default-gcc-and-g-version%23new-answer', 'question_page');
        }
        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown

























        6 Answers
        6






        active

        oldest

        votes








        6 Answers
        6






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes








        up vote
        238
        down vote



        accepted










        First erased the current update-alternatives setup for gcc and g++:



        sudo update-alternatives --remove-all gcc 
        sudo update-alternatives --remove-all g++


        Install Packages



        It seems that both gcc-4.3 and gcc-4.4 are installed after install build-essential. However, we can explicitly install the following packages:



        sudo apt-get install gcc-4.3 gcc-4.4 g++-4.3 g++-4.4


        Install Alternatives



        Symbolic links cc and c++ are installed by default. We will install symbol links for gcc and g++, then link cc and c++ to gcc and g++ respectively.



        sudo update-alternatives --install /usr/bin/gcc gcc /usr/bin/gcc-4.3 10
        sudo update-alternatives --install /usr/bin/gcc gcc /usr/bin/gcc-4.4 20

        sudo update-alternatives --install /usr/bin/g++ g++ /usr/bin/g++-4.3 10
        sudo update-alternatives --install /usr/bin/g++ g++ /usr/bin/g++-4.4 20

        sudo update-alternatives --install /usr/bin/cc cc /usr/bin/gcc 30
        sudo update-alternatives --set cc /usr/bin/gcc

        sudo update-alternatives --install /usr/bin/c++ c++ /usr/bin/g++ 30
        sudo update-alternatives --set c++ /usr/bin/g++


        Configure Alternatives



        The last step is configuring the default commands for gcc, g++. It's easy to switch between 4.3 and 4.4 interactively:



        sudo update-alternatives --config gcc
        sudo update-alternatives --config g++


        Or switch using script:



        #!/bin/sh

        if [ -z "$1" ]; then
        echo "usage: $0 version" 1>&2
        exit 1
        fi

        if [ ! -f "/usr/bin/gcc-$1" ] || [ ! -f "/usr/bin/g++-$1" ]; then
        echo "no such version gcc/g++ installed" 1>&2
        exit 1
        fi

        update-alternatives --set gcc "/usr/bin/gcc-$1"
        update-alternatives --set g++ "/usr/bin/g++-$1"





        share|improve this answer



















        • 4




          Thx, so you have to add them manually to update-alternatives.. IIRC earlier Ubuntu versions did that automatically.
          – Nils
          Feb 15 '11 at 19:33










        • This is especially useful to me when compiling nvidia modules for different kernels. Thank you so much for explaining update-alternatives
          – earthmeLon
          Apr 15 '12 at 10:57






        • 1




          Thank you! I used your other answer to update from 4.6 to 4.7. I wanted to use this answer, but I was not sure why do you put numbers like 10 20 30 after some of you commands. Could you please explain?
          – Martin Drozdik
          Dec 28 '12 at 22:02






        • 7




          The numbers are priorities as it turns out, according to the manpage. I imagine in the case that one of the version is uninstalled it will use those priorities to determine which one should become the new default.
          – Ibrahim
          Jan 14 '13 at 20:04






        • 1




          @Ibrahim: No, they determine what gets chosen when you select auto mode
          – Cookie
          Mar 24 '14 at 16:25















        up vote
        238
        down vote



        accepted










        First erased the current update-alternatives setup for gcc and g++:



        sudo update-alternatives --remove-all gcc 
        sudo update-alternatives --remove-all g++


        Install Packages



        It seems that both gcc-4.3 and gcc-4.4 are installed after install build-essential. However, we can explicitly install the following packages:



        sudo apt-get install gcc-4.3 gcc-4.4 g++-4.3 g++-4.4


        Install Alternatives



        Symbolic links cc and c++ are installed by default. We will install symbol links for gcc and g++, then link cc and c++ to gcc and g++ respectively.



        sudo update-alternatives --install /usr/bin/gcc gcc /usr/bin/gcc-4.3 10
        sudo update-alternatives --install /usr/bin/gcc gcc /usr/bin/gcc-4.4 20

        sudo update-alternatives --install /usr/bin/g++ g++ /usr/bin/g++-4.3 10
        sudo update-alternatives --install /usr/bin/g++ g++ /usr/bin/g++-4.4 20

        sudo update-alternatives --install /usr/bin/cc cc /usr/bin/gcc 30
        sudo update-alternatives --set cc /usr/bin/gcc

        sudo update-alternatives --install /usr/bin/c++ c++ /usr/bin/g++ 30
        sudo update-alternatives --set c++ /usr/bin/g++


        Configure Alternatives



        The last step is configuring the default commands for gcc, g++. It's easy to switch between 4.3 and 4.4 interactively:



        sudo update-alternatives --config gcc
        sudo update-alternatives --config g++


        Or switch using script:



        #!/bin/sh

        if [ -z "$1" ]; then
        echo "usage: $0 version" 1>&2
        exit 1
        fi

        if [ ! -f "/usr/bin/gcc-$1" ] || [ ! -f "/usr/bin/g++-$1" ]; then
        echo "no such version gcc/g++ installed" 1>&2
        exit 1
        fi

        update-alternatives --set gcc "/usr/bin/gcc-$1"
        update-alternatives --set g++ "/usr/bin/g++-$1"





        share|improve this answer



















        • 4




          Thx, so you have to add them manually to update-alternatives.. IIRC earlier Ubuntu versions did that automatically.
          – Nils
          Feb 15 '11 at 19:33










        • This is especially useful to me when compiling nvidia modules for different kernels. Thank you so much for explaining update-alternatives
          – earthmeLon
          Apr 15 '12 at 10:57






        • 1




          Thank you! I used your other answer to update from 4.6 to 4.7. I wanted to use this answer, but I was not sure why do you put numbers like 10 20 30 after some of you commands. Could you please explain?
          – Martin Drozdik
          Dec 28 '12 at 22:02






        • 7




          The numbers are priorities as it turns out, according to the manpage. I imagine in the case that one of the version is uninstalled it will use those priorities to determine which one should become the new default.
          – Ibrahim
          Jan 14 '13 at 20:04






        • 1




          @Ibrahim: No, they determine what gets chosen when you select auto mode
          – Cookie
          Mar 24 '14 at 16:25













        up vote
        238
        down vote



        accepted







        up vote
        238
        down vote



        accepted






        First erased the current update-alternatives setup for gcc and g++:



        sudo update-alternatives --remove-all gcc 
        sudo update-alternatives --remove-all g++


        Install Packages



        It seems that both gcc-4.3 and gcc-4.4 are installed after install build-essential. However, we can explicitly install the following packages:



        sudo apt-get install gcc-4.3 gcc-4.4 g++-4.3 g++-4.4


        Install Alternatives



        Symbolic links cc and c++ are installed by default. We will install symbol links for gcc and g++, then link cc and c++ to gcc and g++ respectively.



        sudo update-alternatives --install /usr/bin/gcc gcc /usr/bin/gcc-4.3 10
        sudo update-alternatives --install /usr/bin/gcc gcc /usr/bin/gcc-4.4 20

        sudo update-alternatives --install /usr/bin/g++ g++ /usr/bin/g++-4.3 10
        sudo update-alternatives --install /usr/bin/g++ g++ /usr/bin/g++-4.4 20

        sudo update-alternatives --install /usr/bin/cc cc /usr/bin/gcc 30
        sudo update-alternatives --set cc /usr/bin/gcc

        sudo update-alternatives --install /usr/bin/c++ c++ /usr/bin/g++ 30
        sudo update-alternatives --set c++ /usr/bin/g++


        Configure Alternatives



        The last step is configuring the default commands for gcc, g++. It's easy to switch between 4.3 and 4.4 interactively:



        sudo update-alternatives --config gcc
        sudo update-alternatives --config g++


        Or switch using script:



        #!/bin/sh

        if [ -z "$1" ]; then
        echo "usage: $0 version" 1>&2
        exit 1
        fi

        if [ ! -f "/usr/bin/gcc-$1" ] || [ ! -f "/usr/bin/g++-$1" ]; then
        echo "no such version gcc/g++ installed" 1>&2
        exit 1
        fi

        update-alternatives --set gcc "/usr/bin/gcc-$1"
        update-alternatives --set g++ "/usr/bin/g++-$1"





        share|improve this answer














        First erased the current update-alternatives setup for gcc and g++:



        sudo update-alternatives --remove-all gcc 
        sudo update-alternatives --remove-all g++


        Install Packages



        It seems that both gcc-4.3 and gcc-4.4 are installed after install build-essential. However, we can explicitly install the following packages:



        sudo apt-get install gcc-4.3 gcc-4.4 g++-4.3 g++-4.4


        Install Alternatives



        Symbolic links cc and c++ are installed by default. We will install symbol links for gcc and g++, then link cc and c++ to gcc and g++ respectively.



        sudo update-alternatives --install /usr/bin/gcc gcc /usr/bin/gcc-4.3 10
        sudo update-alternatives --install /usr/bin/gcc gcc /usr/bin/gcc-4.4 20

        sudo update-alternatives --install /usr/bin/g++ g++ /usr/bin/g++-4.3 10
        sudo update-alternatives --install /usr/bin/g++ g++ /usr/bin/g++-4.4 20

        sudo update-alternatives --install /usr/bin/cc cc /usr/bin/gcc 30
        sudo update-alternatives --set cc /usr/bin/gcc

        sudo update-alternatives --install /usr/bin/c++ c++ /usr/bin/g++ 30
        sudo update-alternatives --set c++ /usr/bin/g++


        Configure Alternatives



        The last step is configuring the default commands for gcc, g++. It's easy to switch between 4.3 and 4.4 interactively:



        sudo update-alternatives --config gcc
        sudo update-alternatives --config g++


        Or switch using script:



        #!/bin/sh

        if [ -z "$1" ]; then
        echo "usage: $0 version" 1>&2
        exit 1
        fi

        if [ ! -f "/usr/bin/gcc-$1" ] || [ ! -f "/usr/bin/g++-$1" ]; then
        echo "no such version gcc/g++ installed" 1>&2
        exit 1
        fi

        update-alternatives --set gcc "/usr/bin/gcc-$1"
        update-alternatives --set g++ "/usr/bin/g++-$1"






        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited Dec 23 '15 at 13:54









        muru

        135k19288488




        135k19288488










        answered Feb 15 '11 at 19:05









        hhlp

        32k1377131




        32k1377131








        • 4




          Thx, so you have to add them manually to update-alternatives.. IIRC earlier Ubuntu versions did that automatically.
          – Nils
          Feb 15 '11 at 19:33










        • This is especially useful to me when compiling nvidia modules for different kernels. Thank you so much for explaining update-alternatives
          – earthmeLon
          Apr 15 '12 at 10:57






        • 1




          Thank you! I used your other answer to update from 4.6 to 4.7. I wanted to use this answer, but I was not sure why do you put numbers like 10 20 30 after some of you commands. Could you please explain?
          – Martin Drozdik
          Dec 28 '12 at 22:02






        • 7




          The numbers are priorities as it turns out, according to the manpage. I imagine in the case that one of the version is uninstalled it will use those priorities to determine which one should become the new default.
          – Ibrahim
          Jan 14 '13 at 20:04






        • 1




          @Ibrahim: No, they determine what gets chosen when you select auto mode
          – Cookie
          Mar 24 '14 at 16:25














        • 4




          Thx, so you have to add them manually to update-alternatives.. IIRC earlier Ubuntu versions did that automatically.
          – Nils
          Feb 15 '11 at 19:33










        • This is especially useful to me when compiling nvidia modules for different kernels. Thank you so much for explaining update-alternatives
          – earthmeLon
          Apr 15 '12 at 10:57






        • 1




          Thank you! I used your other answer to update from 4.6 to 4.7. I wanted to use this answer, but I was not sure why do you put numbers like 10 20 30 after some of you commands. Could you please explain?
          – Martin Drozdik
          Dec 28 '12 at 22:02






        • 7




          The numbers are priorities as it turns out, according to the manpage. I imagine in the case that one of the version is uninstalled it will use those priorities to determine which one should become the new default.
          – Ibrahim
          Jan 14 '13 at 20:04






        • 1




          @Ibrahim: No, they determine what gets chosen when you select auto mode
          – Cookie
          Mar 24 '14 at 16:25








        4




        4




        Thx, so you have to add them manually to update-alternatives.. IIRC earlier Ubuntu versions did that automatically.
        – Nils
        Feb 15 '11 at 19:33




        Thx, so you have to add them manually to update-alternatives.. IIRC earlier Ubuntu versions did that automatically.
        – Nils
        Feb 15 '11 at 19:33












        This is especially useful to me when compiling nvidia modules for different kernels. Thank you so much for explaining update-alternatives
        – earthmeLon
        Apr 15 '12 at 10:57




        This is especially useful to me when compiling nvidia modules for different kernels. Thank you so much for explaining update-alternatives
        – earthmeLon
        Apr 15 '12 at 10:57




        1




        1




        Thank you! I used your other answer to update from 4.6 to 4.7. I wanted to use this answer, but I was not sure why do you put numbers like 10 20 30 after some of you commands. Could you please explain?
        – Martin Drozdik
        Dec 28 '12 at 22:02




        Thank you! I used your other answer to update from 4.6 to 4.7. I wanted to use this answer, but I was not sure why do you put numbers like 10 20 30 after some of you commands. Could you please explain?
        – Martin Drozdik
        Dec 28 '12 at 22:02




        7




        7




        The numbers are priorities as it turns out, according to the manpage. I imagine in the case that one of the version is uninstalled it will use those priorities to determine which one should become the new default.
        – Ibrahim
        Jan 14 '13 at 20:04




        The numbers are priorities as it turns out, according to the manpage. I imagine in the case that one of the version is uninstalled it will use those priorities to determine which one should become the new default.
        – Ibrahim
        Jan 14 '13 at 20:04




        1




        1




        @Ibrahim: No, they determine what gets chosen when you select auto mode
        – Cookie
        Mar 24 '14 at 16:25




        @Ibrahim: No, they determine what gets chosen when you select auto mode
        – Cookie
        Mar 24 '14 at 16:25












        up vote
        33
        down vote













        execute in terminal :



        gcc -v
        g++ -v


        Okay, so that part is fairly simple. The tricky part is that when you issue the command GCC it is actually a sybolic link to which ever version of GCC you are using. What this means is we can create a symbolic link from GCC to whichever version of GCC we want.




        • You can see the symbolic link :



        ls -la /usr/bin | grep gcc-4.4
        ls -la /usr/bin | grep g++-4.4




        • So what we need to do is remove the GCC symlink and the G++ symlink and then recreate them linked to GCC 4.3 and G++ 4.3:



        rm /usr/bin/gcc
        rm /usr/bin/g++

        ln -s /usr/bin/gcc-4.3 /usr/bin/gcc
        ln -s /usr/bin/g++-4.3 /usr/bin/g++




        • Now if we check the symbolic links again we will see GCC & G++ are now linked to GCC 4.3 and G++ 4.3:



        ls -la /usr/bin/ | grep gcc
        ls -la /usr/bin/ | grep g++




        • Finally we can check our GCC -v again and make sure we are using the correct version:



        gcc -v
        g++ -v






        share|improve this answer



























          up vote
          33
          down vote













          execute in terminal :



          gcc -v
          g++ -v


          Okay, so that part is fairly simple. The tricky part is that when you issue the command GCC it is actually a sybolic link to which ever version of GCC you are using. What this means is we can create a symbolic link from GCC to whichever version of GCC we want.




          • You can see the symbolic link :



          ls -la /usr/bin | grep gcc-4.4
          ls -la /usr/bin | grep g++-4.4




          • So what we need to do is remove the GCC symlink and the G++ symlink and then recreate them linked to GCC 4.3 and G++ 4.3:



          rm /usr/bin/gcc
          rm /usr/bin/g++

          ln -s /usr/bin/gcc-4.3 /usr/bin/gcc
          ln -s /usr/bin/g++-4.3 /usr/bin/g++




          • Now if we check the symbolic links again we will see GCC & G++ are now linked to GCC 4.3 and G++ 4.3:



          ls -la /usr/bin/ | grep gcc
          ls -la /usr/bin/ | grep g++




          • Finally we can check our GCC -v again and make sure we are using the correct version:



          gcc -v
          g++ -v






          share|improve this answer

























            up vote
            33
            down vote










            up vote
            33
            down vote









            execute in terminal :



            gcc -v
            g++ -v


            Okay, so that part is fairly simple. The tricky part is that when you issue the command GCC it is actually a sybolic link to which ever version of GCC you are using. What this means is we can create a symbolic link from GCC to whichever version of GCC we want.




            • You can see the symbolic link :



            ls -la /usr/bin | grep gcc-4.4
            ls -la /usr/bin | grep g++-4.4




            • So what we need to do is remove the GCC symlink and the G++ symlink and then recreate them linked to GCC 4.3 and G++ 4.3:



            rm /usr/bin/gcc
            rm /usr/bin/g++

            ln -s /usr/bin/gcc-4.3 /usr/bin/gcc
            ln -s /usr/bin/g++-4.3 /usr/bin/g++




            • Now if we check the symbolic links again we will see GCC & G++ are now linked to GCC 4.3 and G++ 4.3:



            ls -la /usr/bin/ | grep gcc
            ls -la /usr/bin/ | grep g++




            • Finally we can check our GCC -v again and make sure we are using the correct version:



            gcc -v
            g++ -v






            share|improve this answer














            execute in terminal :



            gcc -v
            g++ -v


            Okay, so that part is fairly simple. The tricky part is that when you issue the command GCC it is actually a sybolic link to which ever version of GCC you are using. What this means is we can create a symbolic link from GCC to whichever version of GCC we want.




            • You can see the symbolic link :



            ls -la /usr/bin | grep gcc-4.4
            ls -la /usr/bin | grep g++-4.4




            • So what we need to do is remove the GCC symlink and the G++ symlink and then recreate them linked to GCC 4.3 and G++ 4.3:



            rm /usr/bin/gcc
            rm /usr/bin/g++

            ln -s /usr/bin/gcc-4.3 /usr/bin/gcc
            ln -s /usr/bin/g++-4.3 /usr/bin/g++




            • Now if we check the symbolic links again we will see GCC & G++ are now linked to GCC 4.3 and G++ 4.3:



            ls -la /usr/bin/ | grep gcc
            ls -la /usr/bin/ | grep g++




            • Finally we can check our GCC -v again and make sure we are using the correct version:



            gcc -v
            g++ -v







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited Feb 15 '11 at 17:59

























            answered Feb 15 '11 at 16:49









            hhlp

            32k1377131




            32k1377131






















                up vote
                20
                down vote













                Is this really desirable? There are ABI changes between gcc versions. Compiling something with one version (eg the entire operating system) and then compiling something else with another version, can cause conflict.



                For example, kernel modules should always be compiled with the same version of gcc used to compile the kernel. With that in mind, if you manually altered the symlink between /usr/bin/gcc and the version used in your version of Ubuntu, future DKMS-built modules might use the wrong gcc version.



                If you just want to build things with a different version of gcc, that's easy enough, even with makescripts. For example, you can pass in the version of gcc in the CC environment variable:



                CC="gcc-4.5" ./configure
                CC="gcc-4.5" make


                You might not need it on the make command (configure scripts usually pull it in) but it doesn't hurt.






                share|improve this answer





















                • Thx for your comment. I'm aware of the CC variable, but this was not really the question.
                  – Nils
                  Feb 15 '11 at 16:31






                • 2




                  True enough but I have explained why gcc isn't part of the alternatives system and why this isn't particularly desirable. If neither of those are going to change your mind, just do it manually.
                  – Oli
                  Feb 15 '11 at 16:43










                • It was before? Now they just removed it?! Compiling (userspace) software with different gcc versions should be perfectly ok.. this discussion is getting sill..
                  – Nils
                  Feb 15 '11 at 18:12










                • Can you explain why per-invocation environment variables are preferable to a system-wide configuration setting? $ sudo apt-get install gcc-6 gcc-7 $ CC="gcc-7" ./configure <much output> $ make # uses gcc-7 Whereas sudo update-alternatives gcc gcc-7 would have made sure that you don't accidentally switch ABIs.
                  – kfsone
                  Jun 12 '17 at 22:01

















                up vote
                20
                down vote













                Is this really desirable? There are ABI changes between gcc versions. Compiling something with one version (eg the entire operating system) and then compiling something else with another version, can cause conflict.



                For example, kernel modules should always be compiled with the same version of gcc used to compile the kernel. With that in mind, if you manually altered the symlink between /usr/bin/gcc and the version used in your version of Ubuntu, future DKMS-built modules might use the wrong gcc version.



                If you just want to build things with a different version of gcc, that's easy enough, even with makescripts. For example, you can pass in the version of gcc in the CC environment variable:



                CC="gcc-4.5" ./configure
                CC="gcc-4.5" make


                You might not need it on the make command (configure scripts usually pull it in) but it doesn't hurt.






                share|improve this answer





















                • Thx for your comment. I'm aware of the CC variable, but this was not really the question.
                  – Nils
                  Feb 15 '11 at 16:31






                • 2




                  True enough but I have explained why gcc isn't part of the alternatives system and why this isn't particularly desirable. If neither of those are going to change your mind, just do it manually.
                  – Oli
                  Feb 15 '11 at 16:43










                • It was before? Now they just removed it?! Compiling (userspace) software with different gcc versions should be perfectly ok.. this discussion is getting sill..
                  – Nils
                  Feb 15 '11 at 18:12










                • Can you explain why per-invocation environment variables are preferable to a system-wide configuration setting? $ sudo apt-get install gcc-6 gcc-7 $ CC="gcc-7" ./configure <much output> $ make # uses gcc-7 Whereas sudo update-alternatives gcc gcc-7 would have made sure that you don't accidentally switch ABIs.
                  – kfsone
                  Jun 12 '17 at 22:01















                up vote
                20
                down vote










                up vote
                20
                down vote









                Is this really desirable? There are ABI changes between gcc versions. Compiling something with one version (eg the entire operating system) and then compiling something else with another version, can cause conflict.



                For example, kernel modules should always be compiled with the same version of gcc used to compile the kernel. With that in mind, if you manually altered the symlink between /usr/bin/gcc and the version used in your version of Ubuntu, future DKMS-built modules might use the wrong gcc version.



                If you just want to build things with a different version of gcc, that's easy enough, even with makescripts. For example, you can pass in the version of gcc in the CC environment variable:



                CC="gcc-4.5" ./configure
                CC="gcc-4.5" make


                You might not need it on the make command (configure scripts usually pull it in) but it doesn't hurt.






                share|improve this answer












                Is this really desirable? There are ABI changes between gcc versions. Compiling something with one version (eg the entire operating system) and then compiling something else with another version, can cause conflict.



                For example, kernel modules should always be compiled with the same version of gcc used to compile the kernel. With that in mind, if you manually altered the symlink between /usr/bin/gcc and the version used in your version of Ubuntu, future DKMS-built modules might use the wrong gcc version.



                If you just want to build things with a different version of gcc, that's easy enough, even with makescripts. For example, you can pass in the version of gcc in the CC environment variable:



                CC="gcc-4.5" ./configure
                CC="gcc-4.5" make


                You might not need it on the make command (configure scripts usually pull it in) but it doesn't hurt.







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered Feb 15 '11 at 16:22









                Oli

                219k85552760




                219k85552760












                • Thx for your comment. I'm aware of the CC variable, but this was not really the question.
                  – Nils
                  Feb 15 '11 at 16:31






                • 2




                  True enough but I have explained why gcc isn't part of the alternatives system and why this isn't particularly desirable. If neither of those are going to change your mind, just do it manually.
                  – Oli
                  Feb 15 '11 at 16:43










                • It was before? Now they just removed it?! Compiling (userspace) software with different gcc versions should be perfectly ok.. this discussion is getting sill..
                  – Nils
                  Feb 15 '11 at 18:12










                • Can you explain why per-invocation environment variables are preferable to a system-wide configuration setting? $ sudo apt-get install gcc-6 gcc-7 $ CC="gcc-7" ./configure <much output> $ make # uses gcc-7 Whereas sudo update-alternatives gcc gcc-7 would have made sure that you don't accidentally switch ABIs.
                  – kfsone
                  Jun 12 '17 at 22:01




















                • Thx for your comment. I'm aware of the CC variable, but this was not really the question.
                  – Nils
                  Feb 15 '11 at 16:31






                • 2




                  True enough but I have explained why gcc isn't part of the alternatives system and why this isn't particularly desirable. If neither of those are going to change your mind, just do it manually.
                  – Oli
                  Feb 15 '11 at 16:43










                • It was before? Now they just removed it?! Compiling (userspace) software with different gcc versions should be perfectly ok.. this discussion is getting sill..
                  – Nils
                  Feb 15 '11 at 18:12










                • Can you explain why per-invocation environment variables are preferable to a system-wide configuration setting? $ sudo apt-get install gcc-6 gcc-7 $ CC="gcc-7" ./configure <much output> $ make # uses gcc-7 Whereas sudo update-alternatives gcc gcc-7 would have made sure that you don't accidentally switch ABIs.
                  – kfsone
                  Jun 12 '17 at 22:01


















                Thx for your comment. I'm aware of the CC variable, but this was not really the question.
                – Nils
                Feb 15 '11 at 16:31




                Thx for your comment. I'm aware of the CC variable, but this was not really the question.
                – Nils
                Feb 15 '11 at 16:31




                2




                2




                True enough but I have explained why gcc isn't part of the alternatives system and why this isn't particularly desirable. If neither of those are going to change your mind, just do it manually.
                – Oli
                Feb 15 '11 at 16:43




                True enough but I have explained why gcc isn't part of the alternatives system and why this isn't particularly desirable. If neither of those are going to change your mind, just do it manually.
                – Oli
                Feb 15 '11 at 16:43












                It was before? Now they just removed it?! Compiling (userspace) software with different gcc versions should be perfectly ok.. this discussion is getting sill..
                – Nils
                Feb 15 '11 at 18:12




                It was before? Now they just removed it?! Compiling (userspace) software with different gcc versions should be perfectly ok.. this discussion is getting sill..
                – Nils
                Feb 15 '11 at 18:12












                Can you explain why per-invocation environment variables are preferable to a system-wide configuration setting? $ sudo apt-get install gcc-6 gcc-7 $ CC="gcc-7" ./configure <much output> $ make # uses gcc-7 Whereas sudo update-alternatives gcc gcc-7 would have made sure that you don't accidentally switch ABIs.
                – kfsone
                Jun 12 '17 at 22:01






                Can you explain why per-invocation environment variables are preferable to a system-wide configuration setting? $ sudo apt-get install gcc-6 gcc-7 $ CC="gcc-7" ./configure <much output> $ make # uses gcc-7 Whereas sudo update-alternatives gcc gcc-7 would have made sure that you don't accidentally switch ABIs.
                – kfsone
                Jun 12 '17 at 22:01












                up vote
                10
                down vote













                Edit:



                This assumes that you have installed the version first, with e.g.:



                sudo apt install gcc-4.9 g++-4.9


                Original:



                And here is a one-liner for those who are lazy, just change change the number at the end to the version you want. It will make the change for gcc and/or g++



                ls -la /usr/bin/ | grep -oP "[S]*(gcc|g++)(-[a-z]+)*[s]" | xargs bash -c 'for link in ${@:1}; do sudo ln -s -f "/usr/bin/${link}-${0}" "/usr/bin/${link}"; done' 4.9


                In this example I switched to 4.9



                There are no error checks and what not in this example, so you might want to check what will be run before you run it. Just add echo before sudo. For completeness I provide check line as well:



                ls -la /usr/bin/ | grep -oP "[S]*(gcc|g++)(-[a-z]+)*[s]" | xargs bash -c 'for link in ${@:1}; do echo sudo ln -s -f "/usr/bin/${link}-${0}" "/usr/bin/${link}"; done' 4.9


                The output from the check should be something like:



                sudo ln -s -f /usr/bin/g++-4.9 /usr/bin/g++
                sudo ln -s -f /usr/bin/gcc-4.9 /usr/bin/gcc
                sudo ln -s -f /usr/bin/gcc-ar-4.9 /usr/bin/gcc-ar
                sudo ln -s -f /usr/bin/gcc-nm-4.9 /usr/bin/gcc-nm
                sudo ln -s -f /usr/bin/gcc-ranlib-4.9 /usr/bin/gcc-ranlib
                sudo ln -s -f /usr/bin/x86_64-linux-gnu-g++-4.9 /usr/bin/x86_64-linux-gnu-g++
                sudo ln -s -f /usr/bin/x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc-4.9 /usr/bin/x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc
                sudo ln -s -f /usr/bin/x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc-ar-4.9 /usr/bin/x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc-ar
                sudo ln -s -f /usr/bin/x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc-nm-4.9 /usr/bin/x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc-nm
                sudo ln -s -f /usr/bin/x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc-ranlib-4.9 /usr/bin/x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc-ranlib


                You can check the version after with:



                gcc --version


                Semi-detailed explanation:





                • ls -la /usr/bin/ lists all files in /usr/bin


                • | pipe (send) the output to the next command


                • grep -oP matches the search regex per line. o only shows the result not the entire matched line. P tells grep to use perl-regex. I will not go into regex here, read up on it if you want to.


                • xargs simply put, it gathers the results that are piped to it and send all of them to the end. i.e. to the command following xargs


                • bash well, it's bash. The c flag tells it to use the string as a command. In this example it loops over the arguments sent from xargs by skipping the first (0th) argument, in this case the loop skips 4.9. The 0th argument is used in the loop to change the link.


                • ln -s -f The s flag makes a symbolic link, f forces unlinking first if needed.






                share|improve this answer



















                • 1




                  Very old question, but this answer seems to be one of the gems we should look for when reviewing answers to old posts...
                  – mook765
                  Oct 16 '16 at 7:12










                • Brilliant! Best answer hands down!
                  – Gabriel Staples
                  Jan 15 at 4:04















                up vote
                10
                down vote













                Edit:



                This assumes that you have installed the version first, with e.g.:



                sudo apt install gcc-4.9 g++-4.9


                Original:



                And here is a one-liner for those who are lazy, just change change the number at the end to the version you want. It will make the change for gcc and/or g++



                ls -la /usr/bin/ | grep -oP "[S]*(gcc|g++)(-[a-z]+)*[s]" | xargs bash -c 'for link in ${@:1}; do sudo ln -s -f "/usr/bin/${link}-${0}" "/usr/bin/${link}"; done' 4.9


                In this example I switched to 4.9



                There are no error checks and what not in this example, so you might want to check what will be run before you run it. Just add echo before sudo. For completeness I provide check line as well:



                ls -la /usr/bin/ | grep -oP "[S]*(gcc|g++)(-[a-z]+)*[s]" | xargs bash -c 'for link in ${@:1}; do echo sudo ln -s -f "/usr/bin/${link}-${0}" "/usr/bin/${link}"; done' 4.9


                The output from the check should be something like:



                sudo ln -s -f /usr/bin/g++-4.9 /usr/bin/g++
                sudo ln -s -f /usr/bin/gcc-4.9 /usr/bin/gcc
                sudo ln -s -f /usr/bin/gcc-ar-4.9 /usr/bin/gcc-ar
                sudo ln -s -f /usr/bin/gcc-nm-4.9 /usr/bin/gcc-nm
                sudo ln -s -f /usr/bin/gcc-ranlib-4.9 /usr/bin/gcc-ranlib
                sudo ln -s -f /usr/bin/x86_64-linux-gnu-g++-4.9 /usr/bin/x86_64-linux-gnu-g++
                sudo ln -s -f /usr/bin/x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc-4.9 /usr/bin/x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc
                sudo ln -s -f /usr/bin/x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc-ar-4.9 /usr/bin/x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc-ar
                sudo ln -s -f /usr/bin/x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc-nm-4.9 /usr/bin/x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc-nm
                sudo ln -s -f /usr/bin/x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc-ranlib-4.9 /usr/bin/x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc-ranlib


                You can check the version after with:



                gcc --version


                Semi-detailed explanation:





                • ls -la /usr/bin/ lists all files in /usr/bin


                • | pipe (send) the output to the next command


                • grep -oP matches the search regex per line. o only shows the result not the entire matched line. P tells grep to use perl-regex. I will not go into regex here, read up on it if you want to.


                • xargs simply put, it gathers the results that are piped to it and send all of them to the end. i.e. to the command following xargs


                • bash well, it's bash. The c flag tells it to use the string as a command. In this example it loops over the arguments sent from xargs by skipping the first (0th) argument, in this case the loop skips 4.9. The 0th argument is used in the loop to change the link.


                • ln -s -f The s flag makes a symbolic link, f forces unlinking first if needed.






                share|improve this answer



















                • 1




                  Very old question, but this answer seems to be one of the gems we should look for when reviewing answers to old posts...
                  – mook765
                  Oct 16 '16 at 7:12










                • Brilliant! Best answer hands down!
                  – Gabriel Staples
                  Jan 15 at 4:04













                up vote
                10
                down vote










                up vote
                10
                down vote









                Edit:



                This assumes that you have installed the version first, with e.g.:



                sudo apt install gcc-4.9 g++-4.9


                Original:



                And here is a one-liner for those who are lazy, just change change the number at the end to the version you want. It will make the change for gcc and/or g++



                ls -la /usr/bin/ | grep -oP "[S]*(gcc|g++)(-[a-z]+)*[s]" | xargs bash -c 'for link in ${@:1}; do sudo ln -s -f "/usr/bin/${link}-${0}" "/usr/bin/${link}"; done' 4.9


                In this example I switched to 4.9



                There are no error checks and what not in this example, so you might want to check what will be run before you run it. Just add echo before sudo. For completeness I provide check line as well:



                ls -la /usr/bin/ | grep -oP "[S]*(gcc|g++)(-[a-z]+)*[s]" | xargs bash -c 'for link in ${@:1}; do echo sudo ln -s -f "/usr/bin/${link}-${0}" "/usr/bin/${link}"; done' 4.9


                The output from the check should be something like:



                sudo ln -s -f /usr/bin/g++-4.9 /usr/bin/g++
                sudo ln -s -f /usr/bin/gcc-4.9 /usr/bin/gcc
                sudo ln -s -f /usr/bin/gcc-ar-4.9 /usr/bin/gcc-ar
                sudo ln -s -f /usr/bin/gcc-nm-4.9 /usr/bin/gcc-nm
                sudo ln -s -f /usr/bin/gcc-ranlib-4.9 /usr/bin/gcc-ranlib
                sudo ln -s -f /usr/bin/x86_64-linux-gnu-g++-4.9 /usr/bin/x86_64-linux-gnu-g++
                sudo ln -s -f /usr/bin/x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc-4.9 /usr/bin/x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc
                sudo ln -s -f /usr/bin/x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc-ar-4.9 /usr/bin/x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc-ar
                sudo ln -s -f /usr/bin/x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc-nm-4.9 /usr/bin/x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc-nm
                sudo ln -s -f /usr/bin/x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc-ranlib-4.9 /usr/bin/x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc-ranlib


                You can check the version after with:



                gcc --version


                Semi-detailed explanation:





                • ls -la /usr/bin/ lists all files in /usr/bin


                • | pipe (send) the output to the next command


                • grep -oP matches the search regex per line. o only shows the result not the entire matched line. P tells grep to use perl-regex. I will not go into regex here, read up on it if you want to.


                • xargs simply put, it gathers the results that are piped to it and send all of them to the end. i.e. to the command following xargs


                • bash well, it's bash. The c flag tells it to use the string as a command. In this example it loops over the arguments sent from xargs by skipping the first (0th) argument, in this case the loop skips 4.9. The 0th argument is used in the loop to change the link.


                • ln -s -f The s flag makes a symbolic link, f forces unlinking first if needed.






                share|improve this answer














                Edit:



                This assumes that you have installed the version first, with e.g.:



                sudo apt install gcc-4.9 g++-4.9


                Original:



                And here is a one-liner for those who are lazy, just change change the number at the end to the version you want. It will make the change for gcc and/or g++



                ls -la /usr/bin/ | grep -oP "[S]*(gcc|g++)(-[a-z]+)*[s]" | xargs bash -c 'for link in ${@:1}; do sudo ln -s -f "/usr/bin/${link}-${0}" "/usr/bin/${link}"; done' 4.9


                In this example I switched to 4.9



                There are no error checks and what not in this example, so you might want to check what will be run before you run it. Just add echo before sudo. For completeness I provide check line as well:



                ls -la /usr/bin/ | grep -oP "[S]*(gcc|g++)(-[a-z]+)*[s]" | xargs bash -c 'for link in ${@:1}; do echo sudo ln -s -f "/usr/bin/${link}-${0}" "/usr/bin/${link}"; done' 4.9


                The output from the check should be something like:



                sudo ln -s -f /usr/bin/g++-4.9 /usr/bin/g++
                sudo ln -s -f /usr/bin/gcc-4.9 /usr/bin/gcc
                sudo ln -s -f /usr/bin/gcc-ar-4.9 /usr/bin/gcc-ar
                sudo ln -s -f /usr/bin/gcc-nm-4.9 /usr/bin/gcc-nm
                sudo ln -s -f /usr/bin/gcc-ranlib-4.9 /usr/bin/gcc-ranlib
                sudo ln -s -f /usr/bin/x86_64-linux-gnu-g++-4.9 /usr/bin/x86_64-linux-gnu-g++
                sudo ln -s -f /usr/bin/x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc-4.9 /usr/bin/x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc
                sudo ln -s -f /usr/bin/x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc-ar-4.9 /usr/bin/x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc-ar
                sudo ln -s -f /usr/bin/x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc-nm-4.9 /usr/bin/x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc-nm
                sudo ln -s -f /usr/bin/x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc-ranlib-4.9 /usr/bin/x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc-ranlib


                You can check the version after with:



                gcc --version


                Semi-detailed explanation:





                • ls -la /usr/bin/ lists all files in /usr/bin


                • | pipe (send) the output to the next command


                • grep -oP matches the search regex per line. o only shows the result not the entire matched line. P tells grep to use perl-regex. I will not go into regex here, read up on it if you want to.


                • xargs simply put, it gathers the results that are piped to it and send all of them to the end. i.e. to the command following xargs


                • bash well, it's bash. The c flag tells it to use the string as a command. In this example it loops over the arguments sent from xargs by skipping the first (0th) argument, in this case the loop skips 4.9. The 0th argument is used in the loop to change the link.


                • ln -s -f The s flag makes a symbolic link, f forces unlinking first if needed.







                share|improve this answer














                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer








                edited Feb 1 '17 at 12:50

























                answered Oct 15 '16 at 20:52









                Ale

                10115




                10115








                • 1




                  Very old question, but this answer seems to be one of the gems we should look for when reviewing answers to old posts...
                  – mook765
                  Oct 16 '16 at 7:12










                • Brilliant! Best answer hands down!
                  – Gabriel Staples
                  Jan 15 at 4:04














                • 1




                  Very old question, but this answer seems to be one of the gems we should look for when reviewing answers to old posts...
                  – mook765
                  Oct 16 '16 at 7:12










                • Brilliant! Best answer hands down!
                  – Gabriel Staples
                  Jan 15 at 4:04








                1




                1




                Very old question, but this answer seems to be one of the gems we should look for when reviewing answers to old posts...
                – mook765
                Oct 16 '16 at 7:12




                Very old question, but this answer seems to be one of the gems we should look for when reviewing answers to old posts...
                – mook765
                Oct 16 '16 at 7:12












                Brilliant! Best answer hands down!
                – Gabriel Staples
                Jan 15 at 4:04




                Brilliant! Best answer hands down!
                – Gabriel Staples
                Jan 15 at 4:04










                up vote
                0
                down vote













                Consider one way upgrade:




                • sudo apt install gcc-7

                • sudo apt remove gcc-5


                apt will handle links staff automatically in this case. New C/C++ version is pretty compatible. You hardly would ever need old one.






                share|improve this answer



























                  up vote
                  0
                  down vote













                  Consider one way upgrade:




                  • sudo apt install gcc-7

                  • sudo apt remove gcc-5


                  apt will handle links staff automatically in this case. New C/C++ version is pretty compatible. You hardly would ever need old one.






                  share|improve this answer

























                    up vote
                    0
                    down vote










                    up vote
                    0
                    down vote









                    Consider one way upgrade:




                    • sudo apt install gcc-7

                    • sudo apt remove gcc-5


                    apt will handle links staff automatically in this case. New C/C++ version is pretty compatible. You hardly would ever need old one.






                    share|improve this answer














                    Consider one way upgrade:




                    • sudo apt install gcc-7

                    • sudo apt remove gcc-5


                    apt will handle links staff automatically in this case. New C/C++ version is pretty compatible. You hardly would ever need old one.







                    share|improve this answer














                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer








                    edited Jan 28 at 22:24

























                    answered Oct 29 '17 at 20:02









                    Sergei

                    1814




                    1814






















                        up vote
                        0
                        down vote













                        How about a symbolic link in a temporary directory:




                        mkdir x && PATH=$PWD/x:$PATH && ln -s /usr/bin/g++-7 $PWD/x/g++






                        share|improve this answer

























                          up vote
                          0
                          down vote













                          How about a symbolic link in a temporary directory:




                          mkdir x && PATH=$PWD/x:$PATH && ln -s /usr/bin/g++-7 $PWD/x/g++






                          share|improve this answer























                            up vote
                            0
                            down vote










                            up vote
                            0
                            down vote









                            How about a symbolic link in a temporary directory:




                            mkdir x && PATH=$PWD/x:$PATH && ln -s /usr/bin/g++-7 $PWD/x/g++






                            share|improve this answer












                            How about a symbolic link in a temporary directory:




                            mkdir x && PATH=$PWD/x:$PATH && ln -s /usr/bin/g++-7 $PWD/x/g++







                            share|improve this answer












                            share|improve this answer



                            share|improve this answer










                            answered Dec 5 at 19:42









                            user643722

                            11717




                            11717






























                                draft saved

                                draft discarded




















































                                Thanks for contributing an answer to Ask Ubuntu!


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid



                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                                Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                                Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid



                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function () {
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f26498%2fhow-to-choose-the-default-gcc-and-g-version%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                }
                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown







                                Popular posts from this blog

                                How did Captain America manage to do this?

                                迪纳利

                                南乌拉尔铁路局