Runner's High (Speed)











up vote
24
down vote

favorite
3












I find the following mind-boggling.



Suppose that runner $R_1$ runs distance $[0,d_1]$ with average speed $v_1$. Runner $R_2$ runs $[0,d_2]$ with $d_2>d_1$ and with average speed $v_2 > v_1$. I would have thought that by some application of the intermediate value theorem we can find a subinterval $Isubseteq [0,d_2]$ having length $d_1$ such that $R_2$ had average speed at least $v_1$ on $I$. This is not necessarily so!



Question. What is the smallest value of $Cinmathbb{R}$ with $C>1$ and the following property?




Whenever $d_2>d_1$, and $R_2$ runs $[0,d_2]$ with average speed $Cv_1$, then there is a subinterval $Isubseteq [0,d_2]$ having length $d_1$ such that $R_2$ had average speed at least $v_1$ on $I$.











share|cite|improve this question
























  • Lingering in the background, is the question, whether there is such a "global constant" $C>1$ as asked for in the question. I think there must be, but I haven't been able to prove it...
    – Dominic van der Zypen
    Dec 5 at 14:48






  • 9




    Is the runner allowed to run backward?
    – Robert Israel
    Dec 5 at 15:01






  • 2




    I don't find this so bind-boggling: if $d_1$ is bigger then $d_2/2$, then there is a subset $S$ of $[0,d_2]$ included in every subinterval of length $d_1$. If the second runner is very slow on $S$, for example it needs more time than the total time for the first runner (meaning that it must be very fast outside $S$ to be faster, on average, then the first runner) we have the required situation.
    – Ricky
    Dec 6 at 21:21















up vote
24
down vote

favorite
3












I find the following mind-boggling.



Suppose that runner $R_1$ runs distance $[0,d_1]$ with average speed $v_1$. Runner $R_2$ runs $[0,d_2]$ with $d_2>d_1$ and with average speed $v_2 > v_1$. I would have thought that by some application of the intermediate value theorem we can find a subinterval $Isubseteq [0,d_2]$ having length $d_1$ such that $R_2$ had average speed at least $v_1$ on $I$. This is not necessarily so!



Question. What is the smallest value of $Cinmathbb{R}$ with $C>1$ and the following property?




Whenever $d_2>d_1$, and $R_2$ runs $[0,d_2]$ with average speed $Cv_1$, then there is a subinterval $Isubseteq [0,d_2]$ having length $d_1$ such that $R_2$ had average speed at least $v_1$ on $I$.











share|cite|improve this question
























  • Lingering in the background, is the question, whether there is such a "global constant" $C>1$ as asked for in the question. I think there must be, but I haven't been able to prove it...
    – Dominic van der Zypen
    Dec 5 at 14:48






  • 9




    Is the runner allowed to run backward?
    – Robert Israel
    Dec 5 at 15:01






  • 2




    I don't find this so bind-boggling: if $d_1$ is bigger then $d_2/2$, then there is a subset $S$ of $[0,d_2]$ included in every subinterval of length $d_1$. If the second runner is very slow on $S$, for example it needs more time than the total time for the first runner (meaning that it must be very fast outside $S$ to be faster, on average, then the first runner) we have the required situation.
    – Ricky
    Dec 6 at 21:21













up vote
24
down vote

favorite
3









up vote
24
down vote

favorite
3






3





I find the following mind-boggling.



Suppose that runner $R_1$ runs distance $[0,d_1]$ with average speed $v_1$. Runner $R_2$ runs $[0,d_2]$ with $d_2>d_1$ and with average speed $v_2 > v_1$. I would have thought that by some application of the intermediate value theorem we can find a subinterval $Isubseteq [0,d_2]$ having length $d_1$ such that $R_2$ had average speed at least $v_1$ on $I$. This is not necessarily so!



Question. What is the smallest value of $Cinmathbb{R}$ with $C>1$ and the following property?




Whenever $d_2>d_1$, and $R_2$ runs $[0,d_2]$ with average speed $Cv_1$, then there is a subinterval $Isubseteq [0,d_2]$ having length $d_1$ such that $R_2$ had average speed at least $v_1$ on $I$.











share|cite|improve this question















I find the following mind-boggling.



Suppose that runner $R_1$ runs distance $[0,d_1]$ with average speed $v_1$. Runner $R_2$ runs $[0,d_2]$ with $d_2>d_1$ and with average speed $v_2 > v_1$. I would have thought that by some application of the intermediate value theorem we can find a subinterval $Isubseteq [0,d_2]$ having length $d_1$ such that $R_2$ had average speed at least $v_1$ on $I$. This is not necessarily so!



Question. What is the smallest value of $Cinmathbb{R}$ with $C>1$ and the following property?




Whenever $d_2>d_1$, and $R_2$ runs $[0,d_2]$ with average speed $Cv_1$, then there is a subinterval $Isubseteq [0,d_2]$ having length $d_1$ such that $R_2$ had average speed at least $v_1$ on $I$.








recreational-mathematics physics






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 5 at 16:28









Matt F.

6,39811542




6,39811542










asked Dec 5 at 12:47









Dominic van der Zypen

14.2k43177




14.2k43177












  • Lingering in the background, is the question, whether there is such a "global constant" $C>1$ as asked for in the question. I think there must be, but I haven't been able to prove it...
    – Dominic van der Zypen
    Dec 5 at 14:48






  • 9




    Is the runner allowed to run backward?
    – Robert Israel
    Dec 5 at 15:01






  • 2




    I don't find this so bind-boggling: if $d_1$ is bigger then $d_2/2$, then there is a subset $S$ of $[0,d_2]$ included in every subinterval of length $d_1$. If the second runner is very slow on $S$, for example it needs more time than the total time for the first runner (meaning that it must be very fast outside $S$ to be faster, on average, then the first runner) we have the required situation.
    – Ricky
    Dec 6 at 21:21


















  • Lingering in the background, is the question, whether there is such a "global constant" $C>1$ as asked for in the question. I think there must be, but I haven't been able to prove it...
    – Dominic van der Zypen
    Dec 5 at 14:48






  • 9




    Is the runner allowed to run backward?
    – Robert Israel
    Dec 5 at 15:01






  • 2




    I don't find this so bind-boggling: if $d_1$ is bigger then $d_2/2$, then there is a subset $S$ of $[0,d_2]$ included in every subinterval of length $d_1$. If the second runner is very slow on $S$, for example it needs more time than the total time for the first runner (meaning that it must be very fast outside $S$ to be faster, on average, then the first runner) we have the required situation.
    – Ricky
    Dec 6 at 21:21
















Lingering in the background, is the question, whether there is such a "global constant" $C>1$ as asked for in the question. I think there must be, but I haven't been able to prove it...
– Dominic van der Zypen
Dec 5 at 14:48




Lingering in the background, is the question, whether there is such a "global constant" $C>1$ as asked for in the question. I think there must be, but I haven't been able to prove it...
– Dominic van der Zypen
Dec 5 at 14:48




9




9




Is the runner allowed to run backward?
– Robert Israel
Dec 5 at 15:01




Is the runner allowed to run backward?
– Robert Israel
Dec 5 at 15:01




2




2




I don't find this so bind-boggling: if $d_1$ is bigger then $d_2/2$, then there is a subset $S$ of $[0,d_2]$ included in every subinterval of length $d_1$. If the second runner is very slow on $S$, for example it needs more time than the total time for the first runner (meaning that it must be very fast outside $S$ to be faster, on average, then the first runner) we have the required situation.
– Ricky
Dec 6 at 21:21




I don't find this so bind-boggling: if $d_1$ is bigger then $d_2/2$, then there is a subset $S$ of $[0,d_2]$ included in every subinterval of length $d_1$. If the second runner is very slow on $S$, for example it needs more time than the total time for the first runner (meaning that it must be very fast outside $S$ to be faster, on average, then the first runner) we have the required situation.
– Ricky
Dec 6 at 21:21










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
16
down vote



accepted










The constant is $2$. Let $n=lfloor d_2/d_1 rfloor geq 1$, and let $t_k$ be the time which
the long distance runner takes to arrive at the distance $kd_1$ from the origin,
$1leq kleq n$.



Proving by contradiction,
suppose that on every interval $[(j-1)d_1,jd_1], j=1,...,k$ the average speed of the long distance runner is less than
$v_2/2$. Then $t_n>2nd_1/v_2$. On the other hand the total time of the
long distance runner is $d_2/v_2geq t_n$. Therefore
$$2nd_1 < t_n v_2 leq d_2 leq (n+1)d_1,$$
which implies $n<1$, a contradiction.



It is easily seen that $2$ is best possible. Let $d_1=d_2/2+epsilon$ where
$epsilon>0$ is small. Let the long distance runner run with very high speed for half of the distance, then stop (or run very slowly), and then run with the same high speed to the end. The average speed on every interval of length $d_1$ is close to $1/2$ of the overall average speed.



The same argument proves that $Cleq 1+1/n$ when $n$ is known.
Also notice that when $d_2$ is divisible by $d_1$, one can take $C=1$.



Remark. However, this does not solve the problem completely. A complete solution would be the optimal constant $C(d_2/d_1)$ for any given ratio $d_1/d_2$.



Edit. I suppose that $C(x)$ is the following: $C(n)=1$ for every integer $ngeq 1$, $C(n-0)=n/(n-1)$ (these two properties have been proved above), and $C$ is linear between consecutive integers. In particular $C(x)=x$
for $1leq x<2$.






share|cite|improve this answer






























    up vote
    7
    down vote













    Optimal constant $C$ for a particular pair of distances



    $C(r) = r / lfloor r rfloor$, where $r = d_2/d_1$ is the ratio of the two distances



    As Alexandre has already written in his solution, the global maximum for $C$ is $2$, and it is achieved, when $r$ is just slightly below $2$.



    Optimal Racing Strategy



    To illustrate how the optimal racing strategy for the runner who runs the longer distance looks like, let's walk through an example.



    Johnny runs 10 km in 1 hour. Superman wants to run a marathon in the shortest possible time without exceeding Johnny's average speed on any 10-km-segment. So we have $d_1 = 10000$, $d_2 = 42195$, and $r = 4.2195$.



    Superman divides the marathon into k = $lfloor r rfloor + 1= 5$ equal segments by placing $lfloor r rfloor$ stops at the positions $d_2 * i/k$ for $i=1,...,lfloor r rfloor$. In our example, each of the 5 segments has a length of 8439 metres.



    Superman then runs each segment at the speed of light and rests for exactly $t_1$ = 1 hour at each stop. Since any interval of length $d_1$ contains exactly one such stop, the time for any such interval is always slightly above $t_1$, as demanded by the rules. Superman's total time for $d_2$ is just an $epsilon$ above $lfloor r rfloor * t_1$ = 4 hours, the total time he spent resting at the stops. His average speed is $v_2 = d_2 / (t_1 * lfloor r rfloor) = r * d_1 / (lfloor r rfloor * t_1) = r / lfloor r rfloor * v_1$.



    The $C$ he achieves with this strategy is therefore $r / lfloor r rfloor$ = 4.2195 / 4 = 1.054875.



    Why is this optimal?



    It remains to show that Superman's strategy is optimal. To see this, assume that he finished in less than $lfloor r rfloor * t_1$ = 4 hours. Divide his race into $lfloor r rfloor = 4$ equal time slices and look at the distance he covered in each time slice. At least one of these distances will be longer than $d_1$, and each time slice is shorter than $t_1$, which means that he violated the speed limit in that time slice.






    share|cite|improve this answer










    New contributor




    Mark Dettinger is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.


















    • +1 very nice explanation - thanks Mark!
      – Dominic van der Zypen
      Dec 7 at 13:58











    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "504"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f316954%2frunners-high-speed%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    16
    down vote



    accepted










    The constant is $2$. Let $n=lfloor d_2/d_1 rfloor geq 1$, and let $t_k$ be the time which
    the long distance runner takes to arrive at the distance $kd_1$ from the origin,
    $1leq kleq n$.



    Proving by contradiction,
    suppose that on every interval $[(j-1)d_1,jd_1], j=1,...,k$ the average speed of the long distance runner is less than
    $v_2/2$. Then $t_n>2nd_1/v_2$. On the other hand the total time of the
    long distance runner is $d_2/v_2geq t_n$. Therefore
    $$2nd_1 < t_n v_2 leq d_2 leq (n+1)d_1,$$
    which implies $n<1$, a contradiction.



    It is easily seen that $2$ is best possible. Let $d_1=d_2/2+epsilon$ where
    $epsilon>0$ is small. Let the long distance runner run with very high speed for half of the distance, then stop (or run very slowly), and then run with the same high speed to the end. The average speed on every interval of length $d_1$ is close to $1/2$ of the overall average speed.



    The same argument proves that $Cleq 1+1/n$ when $n$ is known.
    Also notice that when $d_2$ is divisible by $d_1$, one can take $C=1$.



    Remark. However, this does not solve the problem completely. A complete solution would be the optimal constant $C(d_2/d_1)$ for any given ratio $d_1/d_2$.



    Edit. I suppose that $C(x)$ is the following: $C(n)=1$ for every integer $ngeq 1$, $C(n-0)=n/(n-1)$ (these two properties have been proved above), and $C$ is linear between consecutive integers. In particular $C(x)=x$
    for $1leq x<2$.






    share|cite|improve this answer



























      up vote
      16
      down vote



      accepted










      The constant is $2$. Let $n=lfloor d_2/d_1 rfloor geq 1$, and let $t_k$ be the time which
      the long distance runner takes to arrive at the distance $kd_1$ from the origin,
      $1leq kleq n$.



      Proving by contradiction,
      suppose that on every interval $[(j-1)d_1,jd_1], j=1,...,k$ the average speed of the long distance runner is less than
      $v_2/2$. Then $t_n>2nd_1/v_2$. On the other hand the total time of the
      long distance runner is $d_2/v_2geq t_n$. Therefore
      $$2nd_1 < t_n v_2 leq d_2 leq (n+1)d_1,$$
      which implies $n<1$, a contradiction.



      It is easily seen that $2$ is best possible. Let $d_1=d_2/2+epsilon$ where
      $epsilon>0$ is small. Let the long distance runner run with very high speed for half of the distance, then stop (or run very slowly), and then run with the same high speed to the end. The average speed on every interval of length $d_1$ is close to $1/2$ of the overall average speed.



      The same argument proves that $Cleq 1+1/n$ when $n$ is known.
      Also notice that when $d_2$ is divisible by $d_1$, one can take $C=1$.



      Remark. However, this does not solve the problem completely. A complete solution would be the optimal constant $C(d_2/d_1)$ for any given ratio $d_1/d_2$.



      Edit. I suppose that $C(x)$ is the following: $C(n)=1$ for every integer $ngeq 1$, $C(n-0)=n/(n-1)$ (these two properties have been proved above), and $C$ is linear between consecutive integers. In particular $C(x)=x$
      for $1leq x<2$.






      share|cite|improve this answer

























        up vote
        16
        down vote



        accepted







        up vote
        16
        down vote



        accepted






        The constant is $2$. Let $n=lfloor d_2/d_1 rfloor geq 1$, and let $t_k$ be the time which
        the long distance runner takes to arrive at the distance $kd_1$ from the origin,
        $1leq kleq n$.



        Proving by contradiction,
        suppose that on every interval $[(j-1)d_1,jd_1], j=1,...,k$ the average speed of the long distance runner is less than
        $v_2/2$. Then $t_n>2nd_1/v_2$. On the other hand the total time of the
        long distance runner is $d_2/v_2geq t_n$. Therefore
        $$2nd_1 < t_n v_2 leq d_2 leq (n+1)d_1,$$
        which implies $n<1$, a contradiction.



        It is easily seen that $2$ is best possible. Let $d_1=d_2/2+epsilon$ where
        $epsilon>0$ is small. Let the long distance runner run with very high speed for half of the distance, then stop (or run very slowly), and then run with the same high speed to the end. The average speed on every interval of length $d_1$ is close to $1/2$ of the overall average speed.



        The same argument proves that $Cleq 1+1/n$ when $n$ is known.
        Also notice that when $d_2$ is divisible by $d_1$, one can take $C=1$.



        Remark. However, this does not solve the problem completely. A complete solution would be the optimal constant $C(d_2/d_1)$ for any given ratio $d_1/d_2$.



        Edit. I suppose that $C(x)$ is the following: $C(n)=1$ for every integer $ngeq 1$, $C(n-0)=n/(n-1)$ (these two properties have been proved above), and $C$ is linear between consecutive integers. In particular $C(x)=x$
        for $1leq x<2$.






        share|cite|improve this answer














        The constant is $2$. Let $n=lfloor d_2/d_1 rfloor geq 1$, and let $t_k$ be the time which
        the long distance runner takes to arrive at the distance $kd_1$ from the origin,
        $1leq kleq n$.



        Proving by contradiction,
        suppose that on every interval $[(j-1)d_1,jd_1], j=1,...,k$ the average speed of the long distance runner is less than
        $v_2/2$. Then $t_n>2nd_1/v_2$. On the other hand the total time of the
        long distance runner is $d_2/v_2geq t_n$. Therefore
        $$2nd_1 < t_n v_2 leq d_2 leq (n+1)d_1,$$
        which implies $n<1$, a contradiction.



        It is easily seen that $2$ is best possible. Let $d_1=d_2/2+epsilon$ where
        $epsilon>0$ is small. Let the long distance runner run with very high speed for half of the distance, then stop (or run very slowly), and then run with the same high speed to the end. The average speed on every interval of length $d_1$ is close to $1/2$ of the overall average speed.



        The same argument proves that $Cleq 1+1/n$ when $n$ is known.
        Also notice that when $d_2$ is divisible by $d_1$, one can take $C=1$.



        Remark. However, this does not solve the problem completely. A complete solution would be the optimal constant $C(d_2/d_1)$ for any given ratio $d_1/d_2$.



        Edit. I suppose that $C(x)$ is the following: $C(n)=1$ for every integer $ngeq 1$, $C(n-0)=n/(n-1)$ (these two properties have been proved above), and $C$ is linear between consecutive integers. In particular $C(x)=x$
        for $1leq x<2$.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Dec 7 at 1:13

























        answered Dec 5 at 16:47









        Alexandre Eremenko

        48.8k6136253




        48.8k6136253






















            up vote
            7
            down vote













            Optimal constant $C$ for a particular pair of distances



            $C(r) = r / lfloor r rfloor$, where $r = d_2/d_1$ is the ratio of the two distances



            As Alexandre has already written in his solution, the global maximum for $C$ is $2$, and it is achieved, when $r$ is just slightly below $2$.



            Optimal Racing Strategy



            To illustrate how the optimal racing strategy for the runner who runs the longer distance looks like, let's walk through an example.



            Johnny runs 10 km in 1 hour. Superman wants to run a marathon in the shortest possible time without exceeding Johnny's average speed on any 10-km-segment. So we have $d_1 = 10000$, $d_2 = 42195$, and $r = 4.2195$.



            Superman divides the marathon into k = $lfloor r rfloor + 1= 5$ equal segments by placing $lfloor r rfloor$ stops at the positions $d_2 * i/k$ for $i=1,...,lfloor r rfloor$. In our example, each of the 5 segments has a length of 8439 metres.



            Superman then runs each segment at the speed of light and rests for exactly $t_1$ = 1 hour at each stop. Since any interval of length $d_1$ contains exactly one such stop, the time for any such interval is always slightly above $t_1$, as demanded by the rules. Superman's total time for $d_2$ is just an $epsilon$ above $lfloor r rfloor * t_1$ = 4 hours, the total time he spent resting at the stops. His average speed is $v_2 = d_2 / (t_1 * lfloor r rfloor) = r * d_1 / (lfloor r rfloor * t_1) = r / lfloor r rfloor * v_1$.



            The $C$ he achieves with this strategy is therefore $r / lfloor r rfloor$ = 4.2195 / 4 = 1.054875.



            Why is this optimal?



            It remains to show that Superman's strategy is optimal. To see this, assume that he finished in less than $lfloor r rfloor * t_1$ = 4 hours. Divide his race into $lfloor r rfloor = 4$ equal time slices and look at the distance he covered in each time slice. At least one of these distances will be longer than $d_1$, and each time slice is shorter than $t_1$, which means that he violated the speed limit in that time slice.






            share|cite|improve this answer










            New contributor




            Mark Dettinger is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.


















            • +1 very nice explanation - thanks Mark!
              – Dominic van der Zypen
              Dec 7 at 13:58















            up vote
            7
            down vote













            Optimal constant $C$ for a particular pair of distances



            $C(r) = r / lfloor r rfloor$, where $r = d_2/d_1$ is the ratio of the two distances



            As Alexandre has already written in his solution, the global maximum for $C$ is $2$, and it is achieved, when $r$ is just slightly below $2$.



            Optimal Racing Strategy



            To illustrate how the optimal racing strategy for the runner who runs the longer distance looks like, let's walk through an example.



            Johnny runs 10 km in 1 hour. Superman wants to run a marathon in the shortest possible time without exceeding Johnny's average speed on any 10-km-segment. So we have $d_1 = 10000$, $d_2 = 42195$, and $r = 4.2195$.



            Superman divides the marathon into k = $lfloor r rfloor + 1= 5$ equal segments by placing $lfloor r rfloor$ stops at the positions $d_2 * i/k$ for $i=1,...,lfloor r rfloor$. In our example, each of the 5 segments has a length of 8439 metres.



            Superman then runs each segment at the speed of light and rests for exactly $t_1$ = 1 hour at each stop. Since any interval of length $d_1$ contains exactly one such stop, the time for any such interval is always slightly above $t_1$, as demanded by the rules. Superman's total time for $d_2$ is just an $epsilon$ above $lfloor r rfloor * t_1$ = 4 hours, the total time he spent resting at the stops. His average speed is $v_2 = d_2 / (t_1 * lfloor r rfloor) = r * d_1 / (lfloor r rfloor * t_1) = r / lfloor r rfloor * v_1$.



            The $C$ he achieves with this strategy is therefore $r / lfloor r rfloor$ = 4.2195 / 4 = 1.054875.



            Why is this optimal?



            It remains to show that Superman's strategy is optimal. To see this, assume that he finished in less than $lfloor r rfloor * t_1$ = 4 hours. Divide his race into $lfloor r rfloor = 4$ equal time slices and look at the distance he covered in each time slice. At least one of these distances will be longer than $d_1$, and each time slice is shorter than $t_1$, which means that he violated the speed limit in that time slice.






            share|cite|improve this answer










            New contributor




            Mark Dettinger is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.


















            • +1 very nice explanation - thanks Mark!
              – Dominic van der Zypen
              Dec 7 at 13:58













            up vote
            7
            down vote










            up vote
            7
            down vote









            Optimal constant $C$ for a particular pair of distances



            $C(r) = r / lfloor r rfloor$, where $r = d_2/d_1$ is the ratio of the two distances



            As Alexandre has already written in his solution, the global maximum for $C$ is $2$, and it is achieved, when $r$ is just slightly below $2$.



            Optimal Racing Strategy



            To illustrate how the optimal racing strategy for the runner who runs the longer distance looks like, let's walk through an example.



            Johnny runs 10 km in 1 hour. Superman wants to run a marathon in the shortest possible time without exceeding Johnny's average speed on any 10-km-segment. So we have $d_1 = 10000$, $d_2 = 42195$, and $r = 4.2195$.



            Superman divides the marathon into k = $lfloor r rfloor + 1= 5$ equal segments by placing $lfloor r rfloor$ stops at the positions $d_2 * i/k$ for $i=1,...,lfloor r rfloor$. In our example, each of the 5 segments has a length of 8439 metres.



            Superman then runs each segment at the speed of light and rests for exactly $t_1$ = 1 hour at each stop. Since any interval of length $d_1$ contains exactly one such stop, the time for any such interval is always slightly above $t_1$, as demanded by the rules. Superman's total time for $d_2$ is just an $epsilon$ above $lfloor r rfloor * t_1$ = 4 hours, the total time he spent resting at the stops. His average speed is $v_2 = d_2 / (t_1 * lfloor r rfloor) = r * d_1 / (lfloor r rfloor * t_1) = r / lfloor r rfloor * v_1$.



            The $C$ he achieves with this strategy is therefore $r / lfloor r rfloor$ = 4.2195 / 4 = 1.054875.



            Why is this optimal?



            It remains to show that Superman's strategy is optimal. To see this, assume that he finished in less than $lfloor r rfloor * t_1$ = 4 hours. Divide his race into $lfloor r rfloor = 4$ equal time slices and look at the distance he covered in each time slice. At least one of these distances will be longer than $d_1$, and each time slice is shorter than $t_1$, which means that he violated the speed limit in that time slice.






            share|cite|improve this answer










            New contributor




            Mark Dettinger is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.









            Optimal constant $C$ for a particular pair of distances



            $C(r) = r / lfloor r rfloor$, where $r = d_2/d_1$ is the ratio of the two distances



            As Alexandre has already written in his solution, the global maximum for $C$ is $2$, and it is achieved, when $r$ is just slightly below $2$.



            Optimal Racing Strategy



            To illustrate how the optimal racing strategy for the runner who runs the longer distance looks like, let's walk through an example.



            Johnny runs 10 km in 1 hour. Superman wants to run a marathon in the shortest possible time without exceeding Johnny's average speed on any 10-km-segment. So we have $d_1 = 10000$, $d_2 = 42195$, and $r = 4.2195$.



            Superman divides the marathon into k = $lfloor r rfloor + 1= 5$ equal segments by placing $lfloor r rfloor$ stops at the positions $d_2 * i/k$ for $i=1,...,lfloor r rfloor$. In our example, each of the 5 segments has a length of 8439 metres.



            Superman then runs each segment at the speed of light and rests for exactly $t_1$ = 1 hour at each stop. Since any interval of length $d_1$ contains exactly one such stop, the time for any such interval is always slightly above $t_1$, as demanded by the rules. Superman's total time for $d_2$ is just an $epsilon$ above $lfloor r rfloor * t_1$ = 4 hours, the total time he spent resting at the stops. His average speed is $v_2 = d_2 / (t_1 * lfloor r rfloor) = r * d_1 / (lfloor r rfloor * t_1) = r / lfloor r rfloor * v_1$.



            The $C$ he achieves with this strategy is therefore $r / lfloor r rfloor$ = 4.2195 / 4 = 1.054875.



            Why is this optimal?



            It remains to show that Superman's strategy is optimal. To see this, assume that he finished in less than $lfloor r rfloor * t_1$ = 4 hours. Divide his race into $lfloor r rfloor = 4$ equal time slices and look at the distance he covered in each time slice. At least one of these distances will be longer than $d_1$, and each time slice is shorter than $t_1$, which means that he violated the speed limit in that time slice.







            share|cite|improve this answer










            New contributor




            Mark Dettinger is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.









            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited Dec 6 at 20:43





















            New contributor




            Mark Dettinger is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.









            answered Dec 6 at 20:26









            Mark Dettinger

            1035




            1035




            New contributor




            Mark Dettinger is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.





            New contributor





            Mark Dettinger is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.






            Mark Dettinger is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.












            • +1 very nice explanation - thanks Mark!
              – Dominic van der Zypen
              Dec 7 at 13:58


















            • +1 very nice explanation - thanks Mark!
              – Dominic van der Zypen
              Dec 7 at 13:58
















            +1 very nice explanation - thanks Mark!
            – Dominic van der Zypen
            Dec 7 at 13:58




            +1 very nice explanation - thanks Mark!
            – Dominic van der Zypen
            Dec 7 at 13:58


















            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to MathOverflow!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f316954%2frunners-high-speed%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            數位音樂下載

            格利澤436b

            When can things happen in Etherscan, such as the picture below?