How to get raggedright in tabular*?












7














I want to make a table with three columns of paragraphs, each in raggedright. I can only make it work for the first two columns. If I try to add >{raggedright}, as in the commented-out line below, I get the following error:



! Extra alignment tab has been changed to cr.


Here's my MWE:



documentclass{article}

usepackage{array}

newcommandfox{The quick brown fox jumps.}



begin{document}

begin{tabular}{%

  >{raggedright}p{1.5in}%

  >{raggedright}p{1.5in}%

  p{1.5in}}

%  >{raggedright}p{1.5in}} % doesn't work in 3rd column

  fox & fox & fox \

  fox & fox & fox

end{tabular}

end{document}





tables horizontal-alignment







share|improve this question
























  • If you use tabular* with a fixed target width (here: 5in), you should add the directive @{extracolsep{fill}} at the start of the second argument of the tabular* environment.
    – Mico
    Dec 23 at 19:51










  • Thanks, Mico. I fixed the MWE to use tabular (the MWE was hacked down from an attempt to figure this out, which itself was hacked down from the original tabular* I was trying to include in a document).
    – dedded
    Dec 24 at 3:35
















7














I want to make a table with three columns of paragraphs, each in raggedright. I can only make it work for the first two columns. If I try to add >{raggedright}, as in the commented-out line below, I get the following error:



! Extra alignment tab has been changed to cr.


Here's my MWE:



documentclass{article}

usepackage{array}

newcommandfox{The quick brown fox jumps.}



begin{document}

begin{tabular}{%

  >{raggedright}p{1.5in}%

  >{raggedright}p{1.5in}%

  p{1.5in}}

%  >{raggedright}p{1.5in}} % doesn't work in 3rd column

  fox & fox & fox \

  fox & fox & fox

end{tabular}

end{document}





tables horizontal-alignment







share|improve this question
























  • If you use tabular* with a fixed target width (here: 5in), you should add the directive @{extracolsep{fill}} at the start of the second argument of the tabular* environment.
    – Mico
    Dec 23 at 19:51










  • Thanks, Mico. I fixed the MWE to use tabular (the MWE was hacked down from an attempt to figure this out, which itself was hacked down from the original tabular* I was trying to include in a document).
    – dedded
    Dec 24 at 3:35














7












7








7







I want to make a table with three columns of paragraphs, each in raggedright. I can only make it work for the first two columns. If I try to add >{raggedright}, as in the commented-out line below, I get the following error:



! Extra alignment tab has been changed to cr.


Here's my MWE:



documentclass{article}

usepackage{array}

newcommandfox{The quick brown fox jumps.}



begin{document}

begin{tabular}{%

  >{raggedright}p{1.5in}%

  >{raggedright}p{1.5in}%

  p{1.5in}}

%  >{raggedright}p{1.5in}} % doesn't work in 3rd column

  fox & fox & fox \

  fox & fox & fox

end{tabular}

end{document}





tables horizontal-alignment







share|improve this question















I want to make a table with three columns of paragraphs, each in raggedright. I can only make it work for the first two columns. If I try to add >{raggedright}, as in the commented-out line below, I get the following error:



! Extra alignment tab has been changed to cr.


Here's my MWE:



documentclass{article}

usepackage{array}

newcommandfox{The quick brown fox jumps.}



begin{document}

begin{tabular}{%

  >{raggedright}p{1.5in}%

  >{raggedright}p{1.5in}%

  p{1.5in}}

%  >{raggedright}p{1.5in}} % doesn't work in 3rd column

  fox & fox & fox \

  fox & fox & fox

end{tabular}

end{document}





tables horizontal-alignment




tables horizontal-alignment






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Dec 24 at 3:32

























asked Dec 23 at 19:03









dedded

624312




624312












  • If you use tabular* with a fixed target width (here: 5in), you should add the directive @{extracolsep{fill}} at the start of the second argument of the tabular* environment.
    – Mico
    Dec 23 at 19:51










  • Thanks, Mico. I fixed the MWE to use tabular (the MWE was hacked down from an attempt to figure this out, which itself was hacked down from the original tabular* I was trying to include in a document).
    – dedded
    Dec 24 at 3:35


















  • If you use tabular* with a fixed target width (here: 5in), you should add the directive @{extracolsep{fill}} at the start of the second argument of the tabular* environment.
    – Mico
    Dec 23 at 19:51










  • Thanks, Mico. I fixed the MWE to use tabular (the MWE was hacked down from an attempt to figure this out, which itself was hacked down from the original tabular* I was trying to include in a document).
    – dedded
    Dec 24 at 3:35
















If you use tabular* with a fixed target width (here: 5in), you should add the directive @{extracolsep{fill}} at the start of the second argument of the tabular* environment.
– Mico
Dec 23 at 19:51




If you use tabular* with a fixed target width (here: 5in), you should add the directive @{extracolsep{fill}} at the start of the second argument of the tabular* environment.
– Mico
Dec 23 at 19:51












Thanks, Mico. I fixed the MWE to use tabular (the MWE was hacked down from an attempt to figure this out, which itself was hacked down from the original tabular* I was trying to include in a document).
– dedded
Dec 24 at 3:35




Thanks, Mico. I fixed the MWE to use tabular (the MWE was hacked down from an attempt to figure this out, which itself was hacked down from the original tabular* I was trying to include in a document).
– dedded
Dec 24 at 3:35










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















6














if you use tabularnewline, than you not need arraybackslash for restoring meaning of \:



documentclass{article}

usepackage{array}

newcommandfox{The quick brown fox jumps.}



begin{document}

begin{tabular}{*{3}{>{raggedright}p{1.5in}}}%

  fox & fox & fox    tabularnewline

  fox & fox & fox

end{tabular}

end{document}


enter image description here



off-topic: if you define width of all columns in table, than you not need to define table width with use tabular* environment, since it is determined by column widths. exception is, if you like to add @{extracolsep{fill}} by which you spread columns over prescribed table width.






share|improve this answer























  • Accepted this solution, since it explains my problem (\ getting redefined). Not sure I don't prefer arraybackslash though, since it allows the shorter \ in each row.
    – dedded
    Dec 24 at 3:27



















10














Add arraybackslash after raggedright:



documentclass{article}

usepackage{array}

newcommandfox{The quick brown fox jumps.}



begin{document}

begin{tabular*}{5in}{%

  >{raggedrightarraybackslash}p{1.5in}%

  >{raggedrightarraybackslash}p{1.5in}%

  >{raggedrightarraybackslash}p{1.5in}}% does work in 3rd column :)

  fox & fox & fox \

  fox & fox & fox

end{tabular*}

end{document}


enter image description here



You can shorten the code a bit by repeating the same column 3 times:



documentclass{article}

usepackage{array}

newcommandfox{The quick brown fox jumps.}



begin{document}

begin{tabular*}{5in}{%

    *{3}{>{raggedrightarraybackslash}p{1.5in}}}%

  fox & fox & fox \

  fox & fox & fox

end{tabular*}

end{document}





share|improve this answer





















  • with use only p column type in table i don't see why op use tabular* environment (which width is different than width of columns width). better is use ordinary tabular ...
    – Zarko
    Dec 23 at 19:20












  • @Zarko In general I agree, in this particular case the widths are surprisingly well choosen. Taking the intercolumn spaces into account, the sum is only off by 0.003 inch
    – samcarter
    Dec 23 at 19:24





















3














You can also put raggedright after p. I've just used it for the last column but it would be OK with the other columns. For more details see the descriptions mentioned by @DavidCarlisle in Auto Detect Last Paragraph and Pass to Macro. 



documentclass{article}

usepackage{array}

usepackage{lipsum}

newcommandfox{The quick brown fox jumps.}



begin{document}

begin{tabular*}{5in}{%

  >{raggedright}p{1.5in}%

  >{raggedright}p{1.5in}%

  p{1.5in}<{raggedright}}

%  >{raggedright}p{1.5in}} % doesn't work in 3rd column

  lipsum[1] & lipsum[1] & lipsum[1] \

  fox & fox & fox

end{tabular*}

end{document}





share|improve this answer





















  • that does not work in general, it assumes there is only one paragraph in the cell and no blank line at the ned, and no display math
    – David Carlisle
    Dec 23 at 21:51










  • @DavidCarlisle thanks for the correction.
    – javadr
    Dec 24 at 19:20











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f467119%2fhow-to-get-raggedright-in-tabular%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes








3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









6














if you use tabularnewline, than you not need arraybackslash for restoring meaning of \:



documentclass{article}

usepackage{array}

newcommandfox{The quick brown fox jumps.}



begin{document}

begin{tabular}{*{3}{>{raggedright}p{1.5in}}}%

  fox & fox & fox    tabularnewline

  fox & fox & fox

end{tabular}

end{document}


enter image description here



off-topic: if you define width of all columns in table, than you not need to define table width with use tabular* environment, since it is determined by column widths. exception is, if you like to add @{extracolsep{fill}} by which you spread columns over prescribed table width.






share|improve this answer























  • Accepted this solution, since it explains my problem (\ getting redefined). Not sure I don't prefer arraybackslash though, since it allows the shorter \ in each row.
    – dedded
    Dec 24 at 3:27
















6














if you use tabularnewline, than you not need arraybackslash for restoring meaning of \:



documentclass{article}

usepackage{array}

newcommandfox{The quick brown fox jumps.}



begin{document}

begin{tabular}{*{3}{>{raggedright}p{1.5in}}}%

  fox & fox & fox    tabularnewline

  fox & fox & fox

end{tabular}

end{document}


enter image description here



off-topic: if you define width of all columns in table, than you not need to define table width with use tabular* environment, since it is determined by column widths. exception is, if you like to add @{extracolsep{fill}} by which you spread columns over prescribed table width.






share|improve this answer























  • Accepted this solution, since it explains my problem (\ getting redefined). Not sure I don't prefer arraybackslash though, since it allows the shorter \ in each row.
    – dedded
    Dec 24 at 3:27














6












6








6






if you use tabularnewline, than you not need arraybackslash for restoring meaning of \:



documentclass{article}

usepackage{array}

newcommandfox{The quick brown fox jumps.}



begin{document}

begin{tabular}{*{3}{>{raggedright}p{1.5in}}}%

  fox & fox & fox    tabularnewline

  fox & fox & fox

end{tabular}

end{document}


enter image description here



off-topic: if you define width of all columns in table, than you not need to define table width with use tabular* environment, since it is determined by column widths. exception is, if you like to add @{extracolsep{fill}} by which you spread columns over prescribed table width.






share|improve this answer














if you use tabularnewline, than you not need arraybackslash for restoring meaning of \:



documentclass{article}

usepackage{array}

newcommandfox{The quick brown fox jumps.}



begin{document}

begin{tabular}{*{3}{>{raggedright}p{1.5in}}}%

  fox & fox & fox    tabularnewline

  fox & fox & fox

end{tabular}

end{document}


enter image description here



off-topic: if you define width of all columns in table, than you not need to define table width with use tabular* environment, since it is determined by column widths. exception is, if you like to add @{extracolsep{fill}} by which you spread columns over prescribed table width.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Dec 23 at 23:01









samcarter

85.6k794275




85.6k794275










answered Dec 23 at 19:57









Zarko

120k865156




120k865156












  • Accepted this solution, since it explains my problem (\ getting redefined). Not sure I don't prefer arraybackslash though, since it allows the shorter \ in each row.
    – dedded
    Dec 24 at 3:27


















  • Accepted this solution, since it explains my problem (\ getting redefined). Not sure I don't prefer arraybackslash though, since it allows the shorter \ in each row.
    – dedded
    Dec 24 at 3:27
















Accepted this solution, since it explains my problem (\ getting redefined). Not sure I don't prefer arraybackslash though, since it allows the shorter \ in each row.
– dedded
Dec 24 at 3:27




Accepted this solution, since it explains my problem (\ getting redefined). Not sure I don't prefer arraybackslash though, since it allows the shorter \ in each row.
– dedded
Dec 24 at 3:27











10














Add arraybackslash after raggedright:



documentclass{article}

usepackage{array}

newcommandfox{The quick brown fox jumps.}



begin{document}

begin{tabular*}{5in}{%

  >{raggedrightarraybackslash}p{1.5in}%

  >{raggedrightarraybackslash}p{1.5in}%

  >{raggedrightarraybackslash}p{1.5in}}% does work in 3rd column :)

  fox & fox & fox \

  fox & fox & fox

end{tabular*}

end{document}


enter image description here



You can shorten the code a bit by repeating the same column 3 times:



documentclass{article}

usepackage{array}

newcommandfox{The quick brown fox jumps.}



begin{document}

begin{tabular*}{5in}{%

    *{3}{>{raggedrightarraybackslash}p{1.5in}}}%

  fox & fox & fox \

  fox & fox & fox

end{tabular*}

end{document}





share|improve this answer





















  • with use only p column type in table i don't see why op use tabular* environment (which width is different than width of columns width). better is use ordinary tabular ...
    – Zarko
    Dec 23 at 19:20












  • @Zarko In general I agree, in this particular case the widths are surprisingly well choosen. Taking the intercolumn spaces into account, the sum is only off by 0.003 inch
    – samcarter
    Dec 23 at 19:24


















10














Add arraybackslash after raggedright:



documentclass{article}

usepackage{array}

newcommandfox{The quick brown fox jumps.}



begin{document}

begin{tabular*}{5in}{%

  >{raggedrightarraybackslash}p{1.5in}%

  >{raggedrightarraybackslash}p{1.5in}%

  >{raggedrightarraybackslash}p{1.5in}}% does work in 3rd column :)

  fox & fox & fox \

  fox & fox & fox

end{tabular*}

end{document}


enter image description here



You can shorten the code a bit by repeating the same column 3 times:



documentclass{article}

usepackage{array}

newcommandfox{The quick brown fox jumps.}



begin{document}

begin{tabular*}{5in}{%

    *{3}{>{raggedrightarraybackslash}p{1.5in}}}%

  fox & fox & fox \

  fox & fox & fox

end{tabular*}

end{document}





share|improve this answer





















  • with use only p column type in table i don't see why op use tabular* environment (which width is different than width of columns width). better is use ordinary tabular ...
    – Zarko
    Dec 23 at 19:20












  • @Zarko In general I agree, in this particular case the widths are surprisingly well choosen. Taking the intercolumn spaces into account, the sum is only off by 0.003 inch
    – samcarter
    Dec 23 at 19:24
















10












10








10






Add arraybackslash after raggedright:



documentclass{article}

usepackage{array}

newcommandfox{The quick brown fox jumps.}



begin{document}

begin{tabular*}{5in}{%

  >{raggedrightarraybackslash}p{1.5in}%

  >{raggedrightarraybackslash}p{1.5in}%

  >{raggedrightarraybackslash}p{1.5in}}% does work in 3rd column :)

  fox & fox & fox \

  fox & fox & fox

end{tabular*}

end{document}


enter image description here



You can shorten the code a bit by repeating the same column 3 times:



documentclass{article}

usepackage{array}

newcommandfox{The quick brown fox jumps.}



begin{document}

begin{tabular*}{5in}{%

    *{3}{>{raggedrightarraybackslash}p{1.5in}}}%

  fox & fox & fox \

  fox & fox & fox

end{tabular*}

end{document}





share|improve this answer












Add arraybackslash after raggedright:



documentclass{article}

usepackage{array}

newcommandfox{The quick brown fox jumps.}



begin{document}

begin{tabular*}{5in}{%

  >{raggedrightarraybackslash}p{1.5in}%

  >{raggedrightarraybackslash}p{1.5in}%

  >{raggedrightarraybackslash}p{1.5in}}% does work in 3rd column :)

  fox & fox & fox \

  fox & fox & fox

end{tabular*}

end{document}


enter image description here



You can shorten the code a bit by repeating the same column 3 times:



documentclass{article}

usepackage{array}

newcommandfox{The quick brown fox jumps.}



begin{document}

begin{tabular*}{5in}{%

    *{3}{>{raggedrightarraybackslash}p{1.5in}}}%

  fox & fox & fox \

  fox & fox & fox

end{tabular*}

end{document}






share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Dec 23 at 19:12









samcarter

85.6k794275




85.6k794275












  • with use only p column type in table i don't see why op use tabular* environment (which width is different than width of columns width). better is use ordinary tabular ...
    – Zarko
    Dec 23 at 19:20












  • @Zarko In general I agree, in this particular case the widths are surprisingly well choosen. Taking the intercolumn spaces into account, the sum is only off by 0.003 inch
    – samcarter
    Dec 23 at 19:24




















  • with use only p column type in table i don't see why op use tabular* environment (which width is different than width of columns width). better is use ordinary tabular ...
    – Zarko
    Dec 23 at 19:20












  • @Zarko In general I agree, in this particular case the widths are surprisingly well choosen. Taking the intercolumn spaces into account, the sum is only off by 0.003 inch
    – samcarter
    Dec 23 at 19:24


















with use only p column type in table i don't see why op use tabular* environment (which width is different than width of columns width). better is use ordinary tabular ...
– Zarko
Dec 23 at 19:20






with use only p column type in table i don't see why op use tabular* environment (which width is different than width of columns width). better is use ordinary tabular ...
– Zarko
Dec 23 at 19:20














@Zarko In general I agree, in this particular case the widths are surprisingly well choosen. Taking the intercolumn spaces into account, the sum is only off by 0.003 inch
– samcarter
Dec 23 at 19:24






@Zarko In general I agree, in this particular case the widths are surprisingly well choosen. Taking the intercolumn spaces into account, the sum is only off by 0.003 inch
– samcarter
Dec 23 at 19:24













3














You can also put raggedright after p. I've just used it for the last column but it would be OK with the other columns. For more details see the descriptions mentioned by @DavidCarlisle in Auto Detect Last Paragraph and Pass to Macro. 



documentclass{article}

usepackage{array}

usepackage{lipsum}

newcommandfox{The quick brown fox jumps.}



begin{document}

begin{tabular*}{5in}{%

  >{raggedright}p{1.5in}%

  >{raggedright}p{1.5in}%

  p{1.5in}<{raggedright}}

%  >{raggedright}p{1.5in}} % doesn't work in 3rd column

  lipsum[1] & lipsum[1] & lipsum[1] \

  fox & fox & fox

end{tabular*}

end{document}





share|improve this answer





















  • that does not work in general, it assumes there is only one paragraph in the cell and no blank line at the ned, and no display math
    – David Carlisle
    Dec 23 at 21:51










  • @DavidCarlisle thanks for the correction.
    – javadr
    Dec 24 at 19:20
















3














You can also put raggedright after p. I've just used it for the last column but it would be OK with the other columns. For more details see the descriptions mentioned by @DavidCarlisle in Auto Detect Last Paragraph and Pass to Macro. 



documentclass{article}

usepackage{array}

usepackage{lipsum}

newcommandfox{The quick brown fox jumps.}



begin{document}

begin{tabular*}{5in}{%

  >{raggedright}p{1.5in}%

  >{raggedright}p{1.5in}%

  p{1.5in}<{raggedright}}

%  >{raggedright}p{1.5in}} % doesn't work in 3rd column

  lipsum[1] & lipsum[1] & lipsum[1] \

  fox & fox & fox

end{tabular*}

end{document}





share|improve this answer





















  • that does not work in general, it assumes there is only one paragraph in the cell and no blank line at the ned, and no display math
    – David Carlisle
    Dec 23 at 21:51










  • @DavidCarlisle thanks for the correction.
    – javadr
    Dec 24 at 19:20














3












3








3






You can also put raggedright after p. I've just used it for the last column but it would be OK with the other columns. For more details see the descriptions mentioned by @DavidCarlisle in Auto Detect Last Paragraph and Pass to Macro. 



documentclass{article}

usepackage{array}

usepackage{lipsum}

newcommandfox{The quick brown fox jumps.}



begin{document}

begin{tabular*}{5in}{%

  >{raggedright}p{1.5in}%

  >{raggedright}p{1.5in}%

  p{1.5in}<{raggedright}}

%  >{raggedright}p{1.5in}} % doesn't work in 3rd column

  lipsum[1] & lipsum[1] & lipsum[1] \

  fox & fox & fox

end{tabular*}

end{document}





share|improve this answer












You can also put raggedright after p. I've just used it for the last column but it would be OK with the other columns. For more details see the descriptions mentioned by @DavidCarlisle in Auto Detect Last Paragraph and Pass to Macro. 



documentclass{article}

usepackage{array}

usepackage{lipsum}

newcommandfox{The quick brown fox jumps.}



begin{document}

begin{tabular*}{5in}{%

  >{raggedright}p{1.5in}%

  >{raggedright}p{1.5in}%

  p{1.5in}<{raggedright}}

%  >{raggedright}p{1.5in}} % doesn't work in 3rd column

  lipsum[1] & lipsum[1] & lipsum[1] \

  fox & fox & fox

end{tabular*}

end{document}






share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Dec 23 at 19:27









javadr

1,633313




1,633313












  • that does not work in general, it assumes there is only one paragraph in the cell and no blank line at the ned, and no display math
    – David Carlisle
    Dec 23 at 21:51










  • @DavidCarlisle thanks for the correction.
    – javadr
    Dec 24 at 19:20


















  • that does not work in general, it assumes there is only one paragraph in the cell and no blank line at the ned, and no display math
    – David Carlisle
    Dec 23 at 21:51










  • @DavidCarlisle thanks for the correction.
    – javadr
    Dec 24 at 19:20
















that does not work in general, it assumes there is only one paragraph in the cell and no blank line at the ned, and no display math
– David Carlisle
Dec 23 at 21:51




that does not work in general, it assumes there is only one paragraph in the cell and no blank line at the ned, and no display math
– David Carlisle
Dec 23 at 21:51












@DavidCarlisle thanks for the correction.
– javadr
Dec 24 at 19:20




@DavidCarlisle thanks for the correction.
– javadr
Dec 24 at 19:20


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid …



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid …



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f467119%2fhow-to-get-raggedright-in-tabular%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







-

Popular posts from this blog

數位音樂下載

Image
數位音樂下載 為非以「實體」方式來販賣音樂的相關產品，而使用數位格式如mp3、AAC等文件格式來進行銷售販賣的一种音乐产业形式。著名的數位音樂下載服務商有iTunes Store、RecoChoku、Google Play音乐和微软Zune等。数字音乐下载在二十一世纪初一度风靡全球， [1] [2] 使得传统唱片产业走向衰落，但其自身也在2010年代流媒体音乐服务如Apple Music、Spotify等的挤压下迅速失去市场份额。 [3] [4] 数字音乐下载有便于携带、传播迅速、制作简单成本低等优点，与流媒体音乐相比也能更好保障音乐人权益； [5] 但它同时很可能带来侵犯版权和滥用的情形， [6] 也给音乐产业带来了诸多不利影响。数字音乐下载为音乐人和乐迷提供了更加便捷直接的交流渠道，也一定程度上推动了网络音乐人的出现和独立音乐的迅速发展。 [7] 目录 1 历史 1.1 技术积淀（1987-2000） 1.2 出现与兴起（2000-2004） 1.3 唱片市场的颠覆者（2004-2007） 1.4 巅峰和衰落（2005-2013） 1.5 摇摇欲坠的现状与不可预知的明天（2014至今） 2 主要文件格式 2.1 PCM编码格式 2.1.1 WAV 2.1.2 APE 2.1.3 FLAC 2.2 苹果推出的无损文件格式 2.2.1 AIFF 2.2.2 ALAC 2.3 有损压缩格式 2.3.1 MP3 2.3.2 AAC 3 主要市场 3.1 iTunes Store 3.2 Google Play音乐商店 3.3 亚马逊音乐商店 3.4 部分其他音乐商店 4 影响与评价 4.1 对音乐产业的影响 4.2 对科技行业的影响 4.3 正面评价 4.4 负面评价 4.4.1 侵权问题 4.4.2 经营模式不明晰 4.4.3 不适应移动时代 4.5 文化现象 5 延伸阅读 6 参考资料 历史 苹果iTunes+iPod的软硬件搭配让数字音...
Read more

When can things happen in Etherscan, such as the picture below?

Image
2 I don't know why balance of the address is 0. when can this situation? etherscan balances share | improve this question asked yesterday Ru Hi Ru Hi 11 1 New contributor Ru Hi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering. Check out our Code of Conduct. add a comment  |  ...
Read more

格利澤436b

Image
格利泽436b 太陽系外行星 太陽系外行星列表 艺术家笔下的格利泽436b 母恆星 母恆星 Gliese 436 星座 獅子座 赤經 ( α ) 11 h  42 m  11.0941 s [1] 赤緯 ( δ ) +26° 42′ 23.652″ [1] 距離 33.4 ly (10.2 pc) 光譜類型 M2.5 V [1] 軌道參數 半长轴 ( a ) 0.0291±0.0004 [2] AU 軌道離心率 ( e ) 0.150±0.012 [2] 公轉週期 ( P ) 2.643904±0.000005 [3] d (0.00723849 y) 軌道傾角 ( i ) 85.8 +0.21 −0.25 [3] ° 角距 ( θ ) 2.794 mas 近星點時間 ( T 0 ) 2,451,551.716 ±0.01 JD 半振幅 ( K ) 18.68±0.8 m/s 物理性质 质量 ( m ) 22.2±1.0 [2] M ⊕ 半徑 ( r ) 4.327±0.183 [2] [4] R ⊕ 密度 ( ρ ) 1.51 g cm -3 表面重力 ( g ) 1.18 g 溫度 ( T ) 712±36 [2] K 發現 發現時間 2004 發現者 巴特勒、沃格特、 馬西 et al. 發現方法 徑向速度、凌日法 發現地點 美國加利福尼亞州 發表論文 出版 其他名稱 Ross 905 b, GJ 436 b, [5] LTT 13213 b, GCTP 2704.10 b, LHS 310, AC+27:28217 b, Vyssotsky 616 b, HIP 57087 b, GEN# +9.80120068 b, LP 319-75 b, G 121-7 b, LSPM J1142+2642 b, 1RXS J114211.9+264328 b, ASCC 683818 b, G 147-68 b, UCAC2 41198281 b, BP...
Read more