Write the longest period iterating quine bounded by 500 bytes
$begingroup$
Your job is to create the longest period iterating quine, where the length of each program in the sequence is bounded by 500 bytes.
That is, if you repeat the following steps:
- Start with your initial program
- Run the current program
- Go back to step 2
You will eventually get back to your original program. The number of programs in the cycle is your score, which you are trying to maximize.
None of the programs may raise any errors. Each program must be run the same way as well (e.g. no different versions, implementations, compiler options, platforms, etc...).
What separates this challenge from The longest period iterating quine (other than 100 v.s. 500) is that every program in the cycle must also be 500 bytes or less. This means that the longest possible cycle is (256^501 - 1)/255 or less. That of course is a big number, but not that big in terms of how much code it takes to calculate. So the challenge is about using as many of the (256^501 - 1)/255 possibilities as you can, not a busy beaver challenge.
The programs are not permitted to access its own source code. However an empty program is permitted if you want (as long as you follow the other rules).
Since checking the programs manually would be hard, you may figure out the score using theoretical methods. You must include an explanation of the score and correctness with your program. If you can not figure out the score, you may instead use a lower bound of the number of programs in the cycle as a defacto score. You are allowed to update this as you find better lower bounds, or if you find the exact actual score.
This is code-challenge, so highest score wins!
code-challenge quine code-generation
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Your job is to create the longest period iterating quine, where the length of each program in the sequence is bounded by 500 bytes.
That is, if you repeat the following steps:
- Start with your initial program
- Run the current program
- Go back to step 2
You will eventually get back to your original program. The number of programs in the cycle is your score, which you are trying to maximize.
None of the programs may raise any errors. Each program must be run the same way as well (e.g. no different versions, implementations, compiler options, platforms, etc...).
What separates this challenge from The longest period iterating quine (other than 100 v.s. 500) is that every program in the cycle must also be 500 bytes or less. This means that the longest possible cycle is (256^501 - 1)/255 or less. That of course is a big number, but not that big in terms of how much code it takes to calculate. So the challenge is about using as many of the (256^501 - 1)/255 possibilities as you can, not a busy beaver challenge.
The programs are not permitted to access its own source code. However an empty program is permitted if you want (as long as you follow the other rules).
Since checking the programs manually would be hard, you may figure out the score using theoretical methods. You must include an explanation of the score and correctness with your program. If you can not figure out the score, you may instead use a lower bound of the number of programs in the cycle as a defacto score. You are allowed to update this as you find better lower bounds, or if you find the exact actual score.
This is code-challenge, so highest score wins!
code-challenge quine code-generation
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
So.... This isn't a codegolf??? Because if it isn't there is a whole can of worms I can unleash on this!!!
$endgroup$
– KrystosTheOverlord
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@JoKing markdown issues
$endgroup$
– PyRulez
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@KrystosTheOverlord no there is no code golf. However, I expect there to be a code golf like aspect, since the shorter the main program is, the more room for comments (which can make the programs distinct).
$endgroup$
– PyRulez
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@PyRulez Ok! I am working on this now, I accidently just made a program that does exactly the opposite of this challenge... It gets smaller till nothing is left... But I will be making a better version soon!
$endgroup$
– KrystosTheOverlord
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Your job is to create the longest period iterating quine, where the length of each program in the sequence is bounded by 500 bytes.
That is, if you repeat the following steps:
- Start with your initial program
- Run the current program
- Go back to step 2
You will eventually get back to your original program. The number of programs in the cycle is your score, which you are trying to maximize.
None of the programs may raise any errors. Each program must be run the same way as well (e.g. no different versions, implementations, compiler options, platforms, etc...).
What separates this challenge from The longest period iterating quine (other than 100 v.s. 500) is that every program in the cycle must also be 500 bytes or less. This means that the longest possible cycle is (256^501 - 1)/255 or less. That of course is a big number, but not that big in terms of how much code it takes to calculate. So the challenge is about using as many of the (256^501 - 1)/255 possibilities as you can, not a busy beaver challenge.
The programs are not permitted to access its own source code. However an empty program is permitted if you want (as long as you follow the other rules).
Since checking the programs manually would be hard, you may figure out the score using theoretical methods. You must include an explanation of the score and correctness with your program. If you can not figure out the score, you may instead use a lower bound of the number of programs in the cycle as a defacto score. You are allowed to update this as you find better lower bounds, or if you find the exact actual score.
This is code-challenge, so highest score wins!
code-challenge quine code-generation
$endgroup$
Your job is to create the longest period iterating quine, where the length of each program in the sequence is bounded by 500 bytes.
That is, if you repeat the following steps:
- Start with your initial program
- Run the current program
- Go back to step 2
You will eventually get back to your original program. The number of programs in the cycle is your score, which you are trying to maximize.
None of the programs may raise any errors. Each program must be run the same way as well (e.g. no different versions, implementations, compiler options, platforms, etc...).
What separates this challenge from The longest period iterating quine (other than 100 v.s. 500) is that every program in the cycle must also be 500 bytes or less. This means that the longest possible cycle is (256^501 - 1)/255 or less. That of course is a big number, but not that big in terms of how much code it takes to calculate. So the challenge is about using as many of the (256^501 - 1)/255 possibilities as you can, not a busy beaver challenge.
The programs are not permitted to access its own source code. However an empty program is permitted if you want (as long as you follow the other rules).
Since checking the programs manually would be hard, you may figure out the score using theoretical methods. You must include an explanation of the score and correctness with your program. If you can not figure out the score, you may instead use a lower bound of the number of programs in the cycle as a defacto score. You are allowed to update this as you find better lower bounds, or if you find the exact actual score.
This is code-challenge, so highest score wins!
code-challenge quine code-generation
code-challenge quine code-generation
edited 48 mins ago
PyRulez
asked 3 hours ago
PyRulezPyRulez
3,64942357
3,64942357
$begingroup$
So.... This isn't a codegolf??? Because if it isn't there is a whole can of worms I can unleash on this!!!
$endgroup$
– KrystosTheOverlord
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@JoKing markdown issues
$endgroup$
– PyRulez
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@KrystosTheOverlord no there is no code golf. However, I expect there to be a code golf like aspect, since the shorter the main program is, the more room for comments (which can make the programs distinct).
$endgroup$
– PyRulez
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@PyRulez Ok! I am working on this now, I accidently just made a program that does exactly the opposite of this challenge... It gets smaller till nothing is left... But I will be making a better version soon!
$endgroup$
– KrystosTheOverlord
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
So.... This isn't a codegolf??? Because if it isn't there is a whole can of worms I can unleash on this!!!
$endgroup$
– KrystosTheOverlord
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@JoKing markdown issues
$endgroup$
– PyRulez
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@KrystosTheOverlord no there is no code golf. However, I expect there to be a code golf like aspect, since the shorter the main program is, the more room for comments (which can make the programs distinct).
$endgroup$
– PyRulez
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@PyRulez Ok! I am working on this now, I accidently just made a program that does exactly the opposite of this challenge... It gets smaller till nothing is left... But I will be making a better version soon!
$endgroup$
– KrystosTheOverlord
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
So.... This isn't a codegolf??? Because if it isn't there is a whole can of worms I can unleash on this!!!
$endgroup$
– KrystosTheOverlord
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
So.... This isn't a codegolf??? Because if it isn't there is a whole can of worms I can unleash on this!!!
$endgroup$
– KrystosTheOverlord
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@JoKing markdown issues
$endgroup$
– PyRulez
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@JoKing markdown issues
$endgroup$
– PyRulez
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@KrystosTheOverlord no there is no code golf. However, I expect there to be a code golf like aspect, since the shorter the main program is, the more room for comments (which can make the programs distinct).
$endgroup$
– PyRulez
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@KrystosTheOverlord no there is no code golf. However, I expect there to be a code golf like aspect, since the shorter the main program is, the more room for comments (which can make the programs distinct).
$endgroup$
– PyRulez
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@PyRulez Ok! I am working on this now, I accidently just made a program that does exactly the opposite of this challenge... It gets smaller till nothing is left... But I will be making a better version soon!
$endgroup$
– KrystosTheOverlord
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@PyRulez Ok! I am working on this now, I accidently just made a program that does exactly the opposite of this challenge... It gets smaller till nothing is left... But I will be making a better version soon!
$endgroup$
– KrystosTheOverlord
2 hours ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Perl 6, $126^{398}$ iterations
$!=Q~~;<say "$!=Q~{chrs(my@a=[R,] polymod :126[$!.ords]+1: 126 xx*)x?(@a-399)}~;<$_>~~.EVAL">~~.EVAL
Try it online!
This iterates through all the possible combinations of the first 126 bytes of length 398 and under (excluding strings with leading NUL bytes). If you want to see that it actually returns to the first iteration, you can reduce the length to 1 by changing the limit like so.
Explanation:
Each iteration increments the string, stored in base 126 form, and then converts it back to base 126. It does this until it reaches a string with length 399, and then resets the string back to empty again. If you're having trouble conceptualising the number, imagine it with ten bytes instead. Starting from 0
, increment up to 4 digits, 1000
and reset. This is $10^{4-1}$ iterations (including 0
or empty string in my program's case).
$!=Q~~; # Start with an empty string
< ... >~~.EVAL # Set a string to $_ and EVAL it
say "$!=Q~{...}~;<$_>~~.EVAL" # Print the program with the string replaced by
:126[$!.ords] # The string converted from base 126
+1 # Incremented
[R,] polymod : 126 xx* # Back to base 126
chrs( ) # Back to a string
my@a= x?(@a-399) # Only if it isn't 399 characters
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Wow, you did that really fast, I'm almost done with mine, but I'll probably be finishing it tomorrow (mine is going to be in Gol><>)
$endgroup$
– KrystosTheOverlord
42 mins ago
$begingroup$
This calculation suggests that you way over estimated your score. The numerator is how many strings of length 397 there are using 126 symbols. (I had to distribute the fraction into the sum since wolfram alpha was acting weird.)
$endgroup$
– PyRulez
39 mins ago
$begingroup$
@PyRulez I think my number is correct, since it's basically iterating a base 126 number up to 399 digits... I think my explanation was off
$endgroup$
– Jo King
16 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Gol><>, 67 bytes
":1=l8:*4+=S&Q~P:'~'=Q~~'H'||lPaa*5*=?1:1=Q$~|:1)lPaa*5*(Q?:|r2ssHH
Basically this program replicates the H at the end, then when it reaches 499 in length, appends a char with an ascii code of 1, this begins the deletion process, then when it reaches its original length plus one, it increments the last char. Finally, if the last char is a '~', it pushes an H instead!!!
I have no idea what the score would be... Too much math for tonight, I'll figure it out tomorrow...
Try it online!
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "200"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodegolf.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f179752%2fwrite-the-longest-period-iterating-quine-bounded-by-500-bytes%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Perl 6, $126^{398}$ iterations
$!=Q~~;<say "$!=Q~{chrs(my@a=[R,] polymod :126[$!.ords]+1: 126 xx*)x?(@a-399)}~;<$_>~~.EVAL">~~.EVAL
Try it online!
This iterates through all the possible combinations of the first 126 bytes of length 398 and under (excluding strings with leading NUL bytes). If you want to see that it actually returns to the first iteration, you can reduce the length to 1 by changing the limit like so.
Explanation:
Each iteration increments the string, stored in base 126 form, and then converts it back to base 126. It does this until it reaches a string with length 399, and then resets the string back to empty again. If you're having trouble conceptualising the number, imagine it with ten bytes instead. Starting from 0
, increment up to 4 digits, 1000
and reset. This is $10^{4-1}$ iterations (including 0
or empty string in my program's case).
$!=Q~~; # Start with an empty string
< ... >~~.EVAL # Set a string to $_ and EVAL it
say "$!=Q~{...}~;<$_>~~.EVAL" # Print the program with the string replaced by
:126[$!.ords] # The string converted from base 126
+1 # Incremented
[R,] polymod : 126 xx* # Back to base 126
chrs( ) # Back to a string
my@a= x?(@a-399) # Only if it isn't 399 characters
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Wow, you did that really fast, I'm almost done with mine, but I'll probably be finishing it tomorrow (mine is going to be in Gol><>)
$endgroup$
– KrystosTheOverlord
42 mins ago
$begingroup$
This calculation suggests that you way over estimated your score. The numerator is how many strings of length 397 there are using 126 symbols. (I had to distribute the fraction into the sum since wolfram alpha was acting weird.)
$endgroup$
– PyRulez
39 mins ago
$begingroup$
@PyRulez I think my number is correct, since it's basically iterating a base 126 number up to 399 digits... I think my explanation was off
$endgroup$
– Jo King
16 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Perl 6, $126^{398}$ iterations
$!=Q~~;<say "$!=Q~{chrs(my@a=[R,] polymod :126[$!.ords]+1: 126 xx*)x?(@a-399)}~;<$_>~~.EVAL">~~.EVAL
Try it online!
This iterates through all the possible combinations of the first 126 bytes of length 398 and under (excluding strings with leading NUL bytes). If you want to see that it actually returns to the first iteration, you can reduce the length to 1 by changing the limit like so.
Explanation:
Each iteration increments the string, stored in base 126 form, and then converts it back to base 126. It does this until it reaches a string with length 399, and then resets the string back to empty again. If you're having trouble conceptualising the number, imagine it with ten bytes instead. Starting from 0
, increment up to 4 digits, 1000
and reset. This is $10^{4-1}$ iterations (including 0
or empty string in my program's case).
$!=Q~~; # Start with an empty string
< ... >~~.EVAL # Set a string to $_ and EVAL it
say "$!=Q~{...}~;<$_>~~.EVAL" # Print the program with the string replaced by
:126[$!.ords] # The string converted from base 126
+1 # Incremented
[R,] polymod : 126 xx* # Back to base 126
chrs( ) # Back to a string
my@a= x?(@a-399) # Only if it isn't 399 characters
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Wow, you did that really fast, I'm almost done with mine, but I'll probably be finishing it tomorrow (mine is going to be in Gol><>)
$endgroup$
– KrystosTheOverlord
42 mins ago
$begingroup$
This calculation suggests that you way over estimated your score. The numerator is how many strings of length 397 there are using 126 symbols. (I had to distribute the fraction into the sum since wolfram alpha was acting weird.)
$endgroup$
– PyRulez
39 mins ago
$begingroup$
@PyRulez I think my number is correct, since it's basically iterating a base 126 number up to 399 digits... I think my explanation was off
$endgroup$
– Jo King
16 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Perl 6, $126^{398}$ iterations
$!=Q~~;<say "$!=Q~{chrs(my@a=[R,] polymod :126[$!.ords]+1: 126 xx*)x?(@a-399)}~;<$_>~~.EVAL">~~.EVAL
Try it online!
This iterates through all the possible combinations of the first 126 bytes of length 398 and under (excluding strings with leading NUL bytes). If you want to see that it actually returns to the first iteration, you can reduce the length to 1 by changing the limit like so.
Explanation:
Each iteration increments the string, stored in base 126 form, and then converts it back to base 126. It does this until it reaches a string with length 399, and then resets the string back to empty again. If you're having trouble conceptualising the number, imagine it with ten bytes instead. Starting from 0
, increment up to 4 digits, 1000
and reset. This is $10^{4-1}$ iterations (including 0
or empty string in my program's case).
$!=Q~~; # Start with an empty string
< ... >~~.EVAL # Set a string to $_ and EVAL it
say "$!=Q~{...}~;<$_>~~.EVAL" # Print the program with the string replaced by
:126[$!.ords] # The string converted from base 126
+1 # Incremented
[R,] polymod : 126 xx* # Back to base 126
chrs( ) # Back to a string
my@a= x?(@a-399) # Only if it isn't 399 characters
$endgroup$
Perl 6, $126^{398}$ iterations
$!=Q~~;<say "$!=Q~{chrs(my@a=[R,] polymod :126[$!.ords]+1: 126 xx*)x?(@a-399)}~;<$_>~~.EVAL">~~.EVAL
Try it online!
This iterates through all the possible combinations of the first 126 bytes of length 398 and under (excluding strings with leading NUL bytes). If you want to see that it actually returns to the first iteration, you can reduce the length to 1 by changing the limit like so.
Explanation:
Each iteration increments the string, stored in base 126 form, and then converts it back to base 126. It does this until it reaches a string with length 399, and then resets the string back to empty again. If you're having trouble conceptualising the number, imagine it with ten bytes instead. Starting from 0
, increment up to 4 digits, 1000
and reset. This is $10^{4-1}$ iterations (including 0
or empty string in my program's case).
$!=Q~~; # Start with an empty string
< ... >~~.EVAL # Set a string to $_ and EVAL it
say "$!=Q~{...}~;<$_>~~.EVAL" # Print the program with the string replaced by
:126[$!.ords] # The string converted from base 126
+1 # Incremented
[R,] polymod : 126 xx* # Back to base 126
chrs( ) # Back to a string
my@a= x?(@a-399) # Only if it isn't 399 characters
edited 2 mins ago
answered 50 mins ago
Jo KingJo King
22.4k251115
22.4k251115
$begingroup$
Wow, you did that really fast, I'm almost done with mine, but I'll probably be finishing it tomorrow (mine is going to be in Gol><>)
$endgroup$
– KrystosTheOverlord
42 mins ago
$begingroup$
This calculation suggests that you way over estimated your score. The numerator is how many strings of length 397 there are using 126 symbols. (I had to distribute the fraction into the sum since wolfram alpha was acting weird.)
$endgroup$
– PyRulez
39 mins ago
$begingroup$
@PyRulez I think my number is correct, since it's basically iterating a base 126 number up to 399 digits... I think my explanation was off
$endgroup$
– Jo King
16 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Wow, you did that really fast, I'm almost done with mine, but I'll probably be finishing it tomorrow (mine is going to be in Gol><>)
$endgroup$
– KrystosTheOverlord
42 mins ago
$begingroup$
This calculation suggests that you way over estimated your score. The numerator is how many strings of length 397 there are using 126 symbols. (I had to distribute the fraction into the sum since wolfram alpha was acting weird.)
$endgroup$
– PyRulez
39 mins ago
$begingroup$
@PyRulez I think my number is correct, since it's basically iterating a base 126 number up to 399 digits... I think my explanation was off
$endgroup$
– Jo King
16 mins ago
$begingroup$
Wow, you did that really fast, I'm almost done with mine, but I'll probably be finishing it tomorrow (mine is going to be in Gol><>)
$endgroup$
– KrystosTheOverlord
42 mins ago
$begingroup$
Wow, you did that really fast, I'm almost done with mine, but I'll probably be finishing it tomorrow (mine is going to be in Gol><>)
$endgroup$
– KrystosTheOverlord
42 mins ago
$begingroup$
This calculation suggests that you way over estimated your score. The numerator is how many strings of length 397 there are using 126 symbols. (I had to distribute the fraction into the sum since wolfram alpha was acting weird.)
$endgroup$
– PyRulez
39 mins ago
$begingroup$
This calculation suggests that you way over estimated your score. The numerator is how many strings of length 397 there are using 126 symbols. (I had to distribute the fraction into the sum since wolfram alpha was acting weird.)
$endgroup$
– PyRulez
39 mins ago
$begingroup$
@PyRulez I think my number is correct, since it's basically iterating a base 126 number up to 399 digits... I think my explanation was off
$endgroup$
– Jo King
16 mins ago
$begingroup$
@PyRulez I think my number is correct, since it's basically iterating a base 126 number up to 399 digits... I think my explanation was off
$endgroup$
– Jo King
16 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Gol><>, 67 bytes
":1=l8:*4+=S&Q~P:'~'=Q~~'H'||lPaa*5*=?1:1=Q$~|:1)lPaa*5*(Q?:|r2ssHH
Basically this program replicates the H at the end, then when it reaches 499 in length, appends a char with an ascii code of 1, this begins the deletion process, then when it reaches its original length plus one, it increments the last char. Finally, if the last char is a '~', it pushes an H instead!!!
I have no idea what the score would be... Too much math for tonight, I'll figure it out tomorrow...
Try it online!
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Gol><>, 67 bytes
":1=l8:*4+=S&Q~P:'~'=Q~~'H'||lPaa*5*=?1:1=Q$~|:1)lPaa*5*(Q?:|r2ssHH
Basically this program replicates the H at the end, then when it reaches 499 in length, appends a char with an ascii code of 1, this begins the deletion process, then when it reaches its original length plus one, it increments the last char. Finally, if the last char is a '~', it pushes an H instead!!!
I have no idea what the score would be... Too much math for tonight, I'll figure it out tomorrow...
Try it online!
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Gol><>, 67 bytes
":1=l8:*4+=S&Q~P:'~'=Q~~'H'||lPaa*5*=?1:1=Q$~|:1)lPaa*5*(Q?:|r2ssHH
Basically this program replicates the H at the end, then when it reaches 499 in length, appends a char with an ascii code of 1, this begins the deletion process, then when it reaches its original length plus one, it increments the last char. Finally, if the last char is a '~', it pushes an H instead!!!
I have no idea what the score would be... Too much math for tonight, I'll figure it out tomorrow...
Try it online!
$endgroup$
Gol><>, 67 bytes
":1=l8:*4+=S&Q~P:'~'=Q~~'H'||lPaa*5*=?1:1=Q$~|:1)lPaa*5*(Q?:|r2ssHH
Basically this program replicates the H at the end, then when it reaches 499 in length, appends a char with an ascii code of 1, this begins the deletion process, then when it reaches its original length plus one, it increments the last char. Finally, if the last char is a '~', it pushes an H instead!!!
I have no idea what the score would be... Too much math for tonight, I'll figure it out tomorrow...
Try it online!
answered 27 mins ago
KrystosTheOverlordKrystosTheOverlord
1539
1539
add a comment |
add a comment |
If this is an answer to a challenge…
…Be sure to follow the challenge specification. However, please refrain from exploiting obvious loopholes. Answers abusing any of the standard loopholes are considered invalid. If you think a specification is unclear or underspecified, comment on the question instead.
…Try to optimize your score. For instance, answers to code-golf challenges should attempt to be as short as possible. You can always include a readable version of the code in addition to the competitive one.
Explanations of your answer make it more interesting to read and are very much encouraged.…Include a short header which indicates the language(s) of your code and its score, as defined by the challenge.
More generally…
…Please make sure to answer the question and provide sufficient detail.
…Avoid asking for help, clarification or responding to other answers (use comments instead).
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodegolf.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f179752%2fwrite-the-longest-period-iterating-quine-bounded-by-500-bytes%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
So.... This isn't a codegolf??? Because if it isn't there is a whole can of worms I can unleash on this!!!
$endgroup$
– KrystosTheOverlord
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@JoKing markdown issues
$endgroup$
– PyRulez
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@KrystosTheOverlord no there is no code golf. However, I expect there to be a code golf like aspect, since the shorter the main program is, the more room for comments (which can make the programs distinct).
$endgroup$
– PyRulez
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
@PyRulez Ok! I am working on this now, I accidently just made a program that does exactly the opposite of this challenge... It gets smaller till nothing is left... But I will be making a better version soon!
$endgroup$
– KrystosTheOverlord
2 hours ago