Confusion matrix logic












5












$begingroup$


Can someone explain me the logic behind the confusion matrix?




  • True Positive (TP): prediction is POSITIVE, actual outcome is POSITIVE, result is 'True Positive' - No questions.

  • False Negative (FN): prediction is NEGATIVE, actual outcome is POSITIVE, result is 'False Negative' - Why is that? Shouldn't it be 'False Positive'?

  • False Positive (FP): prediction is POSITIVE, actual outcome is NEGATIVE, result is 'False Positive' - Why is that? Shouldn't it be 'True Negative'?

  • True Negative (TN): prediction is NEGATIVE, actual outcome is NEGATIVE, result is 'True Negative' - Why is that? Shouldn't it be 'False Negative'?


enter image description here










share|improve this question







New contributor




Tauno Tanilas is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Stick to positive/negative for the test, and True/false for whether the test matches reality (actual outcome). Then it should be clear.
    $endgroup$
    – Mitch
    yesterday
















5












$begingroup$


Can someone explain me the logic behind the confusion matrix?




  • True Positive (TP): prediction is POSITIVE, actual outcome is POSITIVE, result is 'True Positive' - No questions.

  • False Negative (FN): prediction is NEGATIVE, actual outcome is POSITIVE, result is 'False Negative' - Why is that? Shouldn't it be 'False Positive'?

  • False Positive (FP): prediction is POSITIVE, actual outcome is NEGATIVE, result is 'False Positive' - Why is that? Shouldn't it be 'True Negative'?

  • True Negative (TN): prediction is NEGATIVE, actual outcome is NEGATIVE, result is 'True Negative' - Why is that? Shouldn't it be 'False Negative'?


enter image description here










share|improve this question







New contributor




Tauno Tanilas is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Stick to positive/negative for the test, and True/false for whether the test matches reality (actual outcome). Then it should be clear.
    $endgroup$
    – Mitch
    yesterday














5












5








5





$begingroup$


Can someone explain me the logic behind the confusion matrix?




  • True Positive (TP): prediction is POSITIVE, actual outcome is POSITIVE, result is 'True Positive' - No questions.

  • False Negative (FN): prediction is NEGATIVE, actual outcome is POSITIVE, result is 'False Negative' - Why is that? Shouldn't it be 'False Positive'?

  • False Positive (FP): prediction is POSITIVE, actual outcome is NEGATIVE, result is 'False Positive' - Why is that? Shouldn't it be 'True Negative'?

  • True Negative (TN): prediction is NEGATIVE, actual outcome is NEGATIVE, result is 'True Negative' - Why is that? Shouldn't it be 'False Negative'?


enter image description here










share|improve this question







New contributor




Tauno Tanilas is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$




Can someone explain me the logic behind the confusion matrix?




  • True Positive (TP): prediction is POSITIVE, actual outcome is POSITIVE, result is 'True Positive' - No questions.

  • False Negative (FN): prediction is NEGATIVE, actual outcome is POSITIVE, result is 'False Negative' - Why is that? Shouldn't it be 'False Positive'?

  • False Positive (FP): prediction is POSITIVE, actual outcome is NEGATIVE, result is 'False Positive' - Why is that? Shouldn't it be 'True Negative'?

  • True Negative (TN): prediction is NEGATIVE, actual outcome is NEGATIVE, result is 'True Negative' - Why is that? Shouldn't it be 'False Negative'?


enter image description here







confusion-matrix






share|improve this question







New contributor




Tauno Tanilas is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question







New contributor




Tauno Tanilas is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question






New contributor




Tauno Tanilas is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked yesterday









Tauno TanilasTauno Tanilas

261




261




New contributor




Tauno Tanilas is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Tauno Tanilas is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Tauno Tanilas is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












  • $begingroup$
    Stick to positive/negative for the test, and True/false for whether the test matches reality (actual outcome). Then it should be clear.
    $endgroup$
    – Mitch
    yesterday


















  • $begingroup$
    Stick to positive/negative for the test, and True/false for whether the test matches reality (actual outcome). Then it should be clear.
    $endgroup$
    – Mitch
    yesterday
















$begingroup$
Stick to positive/negative for the test, and True/false for whether the test matches reality (actual outcome). Then it should be clear.
$endgroup$
– Mitch
yesterday




$begingroup$
Stick to positive/negative for the test, and True/false for whether the test matches reality (actual outcome). Then it should be clear.
$endgroup$
– Mitch
yesterday










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















3












$begingroup$

A confusion matrix is a table that is often used to describe the performance of a classification model. The figure you have provided presents a binary case, but it is also used with more than 2 classes (there are just more rows/columns).



The rows refer to the actual Ground-Truth label/class of the input and the columns refer to the prediction provided by the model.



The name of the different cases are taken from the predictor's point of view.



True/False means that the prediction is the same as the ground truth and Negative/Positive refers to what was the prediction.



The 4 different cases in the confusion matrix:



True Positive (TP): The model's prediction is "Positive" and it is the same as the actual ground-truth class, which is "Positive", so this is a True Positive case.



False Negative (FN): The model's prediction is "Negative" and it is wrong because the actual ground-truth class is "Positive", so this is a False Negative case.



False Positive (FP): The model's prediction is "Positive" and it is wrong because the actual ground-truth class is "Negative", so this is a False Positive case.



True Negative (TN): The model's prediction is "Negative" and it is the same as the actual ground-truth class, which is "Negative", so this is a True Negative case.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$









  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Thanks a lot! It's all clear now :)
    $endgroup$
    – Tauno Tanilas
    yesterday





















1












$begingroup$

Please find the below:




  • False Negative (FN): prediction is NEGATIVE, actual outcome is POSITIVE, result is 'False Negative' - Why is that? Shouldn't it be 'False Positive'?

    Answer : The predictive model supposed to give the answer as 'Positive', but it predicted as 'Negative', which means Falsely predicted as Negative aka False Negative.


  • False Positive (FP): prediction is POSITIVE, actual outcome is NEGATIVE, result is 'False Positive' - Why is that? Shouldn't it be 'True Negative'?

    Answer : The predictive model supposed to give the answer as 'Negative', but it predicted as 'Positive', which means Falsely predicted as Positive aka False Positive.


  • True Negative (TN): prediction is NEGATIVE, actual outcome is NEGATIVE, result is 'True Negative' - Why is that? Shouldn't it be 'False Negative'?

    Answer : The predicted output supposed to be Negative, and model also predicted as Negative.



For better understanding, you can run a simple binary classfication model and analyze the confusion matrix.



Thank you,
KK






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    1












    $begingroup$

    Seems like you understand the meaning of the confusion matrix, nut not the logic used to name its entries!



    Here are my 5 cents:



    The names are all of this kind:



    <True/False> <Positive/Negative>
    | |
    Part1 Part2



    1. The first part explains if the prediction was right or not. If you have only True Positive and True Negative your model is perfect. If you have only False Positive and False Negative your model is really bad.


    2. The second part explains the prediction of the model.



    So:




    • False Negative (FN): the prediction is NEGATIVE (0) but the first part is False, this means that the prediction is wrong (should have been POSITIVE (1)).


    • False Positive (FP): the prediction is POSITIVE (1) but the first part is False, this means that the prediction is wrong (should have been NEGATIVE (0)).


    • True Negative (TN): prediction is NEGATIVE and the first part is True. The prediction is right (model predicted NEGATIVE, for NEGATIVE samples)







    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$





















      0












      $begingroup$


      True means Correct, False means Incorrect.




      True Positive (TP): Model predicts P, which is Correct.



      False Positive (FP): Model predicts P, which is Incorrect, must have predicted N.



      True Negative (TN): Model predicts N, which is Correct.



      False Negative (FN): Model predicts N, which is Incorrect, must have predicted P.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$













        Your Answer





        StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
        return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
        StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
        StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
        });
        });
        }, "mathjax-editing");

        StackExchange.ready(function() {
        var channelOptions = {
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "557"
        };
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
        createEditor();
        });
        }
        else {
        createEditor();
        }
        });

        function createEditor() {
        StackExchange.prepareEditor({
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
        convertImagesToLinks: false,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: null,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader: {
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        },
        onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        });


        }
        });






        Tauno Tanilas is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










        draft saved

        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function () {
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdatascience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f47725%2fconfusion-matrix-logic%23new-answer', 'question_page');
        }
        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown

























        4 Answers
        4






        active

        oldest

        votes








        4 Answers
        4






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        3












        $begingroup$

        A confusion matrix is a table that is often used to describe the performance of a classification model. The figure you have provided presents a binary case, but it is also used with more than 2 classes (there are just more rows/columns).



        The rows refer to the actual Ground-Truth label/class of the input and the columns refer to the prediction provided by the model.



        The name of the different cases are taken from the predictor's point of view.



        True/False means that the prediction is the same as the ground truth and Negative/Positive refers to what was the prediction.



        The 4 different cases in the confusion matrix:



        True Positive (TP): The model's prediction is "Positive" and it is the same as the actual ground-truth class, which is "Positive", so this is a True Positive case.



        False Negative (FN): The model's prediction is "Negative" and it is wrong because the actual ground-truth class is "Positive", so this is a False Negative case.



        False Positive (FP): The model's prediction is "Positive" and it is wrong because the actual ground-truth class is "Negative", so this is a False Positive case.



        True Negative (TN): The model's prediction is "Negative" and it is the same as the actual ground-truth class, which is "Negative", so this is a True Negative case.






        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$









        • 2




          $begingroup$
          Thanks a lot! It's all clear now :)
          $endgroup$
          – Tauno Tanilas
          yesterday


















        3












        $begingroup$

        A confusion matrix is a table that is often used to describe the performance of a classification model. The figure you have provided presents a binary case, but it is also used with more than 2 classes (there are just more rows/columns).



        The rows refer to the actual Ground-Truth label/class of the input and the columns refer to the prediction provided by the model.



        The name of the different cases are taken from the predictor's point of view.



        True/False means that the prediction is the same as the ground truth and Negative/Positive refers to what was the prediction.



        The 4 different cases in the confusion matrix:



        True Positive (TP): The model's prediction is "Positive" and it is the same as the actual ground-truth class, which is "Positive", so this is a True Positive case.



        False Negative (FN): The model's prediction is "Negative" and it is wrong because the actual ground-truth class is "Positive", so this is a False Negative case.



        False Positive (FP): The model's prediction is "Positive" and it is wrong because the actual ground-truth class is "Negative", so this is a False Positive case.



        True Negative (TN): The model's prediction is "Negative" and it is the same as the actual ground-truth class, which is "Negative", so this is a True Negative case.






        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$









        • 2




          $begingroup$
          Thanks a lot! It's all clear now :)
          $endgroup$
          – Tauno Tanilas
          yesterday
















        3












        3








        3





        $begingroup$

        A confusion matrix is a table that is often used to describe the performance of a classification model. The figure you have provided presents a binary case, but it is also used with more than 2 classes (there are just more rows/columns).



        The rows refer to the actual Ground-Truth label/class of the input and the columns refer to the prediction provided by the model.



        The name of the different cases are taken from the predictor's point of view.



        True/False means that the prediction is the same as the ground truth and Negative/Positive refers to what was the prediction.



        The 4 different cases in the confusion matrix:



        True Positive (TP): The model's prediction is "Positive" and it is the same as the actual ground-truth class, which is "Positive", so this is a True Positive case.



        False Negative (FN): The model's prediction is "Negative" and it is wrong because the actual ground-truth class is "Positive", so this is a False Negative case.



        False Positive (FP): The model's prediction is "Positive" and it is wrong because the actual ground-truth class is "Negative", so this is a False Positive case.



        True Negative (TN): The model's prediction is "Negative" and it is the same as the actual ground-truth class, which is "Negative", so this is a True Negative case.






        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        A confusion matrix is a table that is often used to describe the performance of a classification model. The figure you have provided presents a binary case, but it is also used with more than 2 classes (there are just more rows/columns).



        The rows refer to the actual Ground-Truth label/class of the input and the columns refer to the prediction provided by the model.



        The name of the different cases are taken from the predictor's point of view.



        True/False means that the prediction is the same as the ground truth and Negative/Positive refers to what was the prediction.



        The 4 different cases in the confusion matrix:



        True Positive (TP): The model's prediction is "Positive" and it is the same as the actual ground-truth class, which is "Positive", so this is a True Positive case.



        False Negative (FN): The model's prediction is "Negative" and it is wrong because the actual ground-truth class is "Positive", so this is a False Negative case.



        False Positive (FP): The model's prediction is "Positive" and it is wrong because the actual ground-truth class is "Negative", so this is a False Positive case.



        True Negative (TN): The model's prediction is "Negative" and it is the same as the actual ground-truth class, which is "Negative", so this is a True Negative case.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered yesterday









        Mark.FMark.F

        9991418




        9991418








        • 2




          $begingroup$
          Thanks a lot! It's all clear now :)
          $endgroup$
          – Tauno Tanilas
          yesterday
















        • 2




          $begingroup$
          Thanks a lot! It's all clear now :)
          $endgroup$
          – Tauno Tanilas
          yesterday










        2




        2




        $begingroup$
        Thanks a lot! It's all clear now :)
        $endgroup$
        – Tauno Tanilas
        yesterday






        $begingroup$
        Thanks a lot! It's all clear now :)
        $endgroup$
        – Tauno Tanilas
        yesterday













        1












        $begingroup$

        Please find the below:




        • False Negative (FN): prediction is NEGATIVE, actual outcome is POSITIVE, result is 'False Negative' - Why is that? Shouldn't it be 'False Positive'?

          Answer : The predictive model supposed to give the answer as 'Positive', but it predicted as 'Negative', which means Falsely predicted as Negative aka False Negative.


        • False Positive (FP): prediction is POSITIVE, actual outcome is NEGATIVE, result is 'False Positive' - Why is that? Shouldn't it be 'True Negative'?

          Answer : The predictive model supposed to give the answer as 'Negative', but it predicted as 'Positive', which means Falsely predicted as Positive aka False Positive.


        • True Negative (TN): prediction is NEGATIVE, actual outcome is NEGATIVE, result is 'True Negative' - Why is that? Shouldn't it be 'False Negative'?

          Answer : The predicted output supposed to be Negative, and model also predicted as Negative.



        For better understanding, you can run a simple binary classfication model and analyze the confusion matrix.



        Thank you,
        KK






        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$


















          1












          $begingroup$

          Please find the below:




          • False Negative (FN): prediction is NEGATIVE, actual outcome is POSITIVE, result is 'False Negative' - Why is that? Shouldn't it be 'False Positive'?

            Answer : The predictive model supposed to give the answer as 'Positive', but it predicted as 'Negative', which means Falsely predicted as Negative aka False Negative.


          • False Positive (FP): prediction is POSITIVE, actual outcome is NEGATIVE, result is 'False Positive' - Why is that? Shouldn't it be 'True Negative'?

            Answer : The predictive model supposed to give the answer as 'Negative', but it predicted as 'Positive', which means Falsely predicted as Positive aka False Positive.


          • True Negative (TN): prediction is NEGATIVE, actual outcome is NEGATIVE, result is 'True Negative' - Why is that? Shouldn't it be 'False Negative'?

            Answer : The predicted output supposed to be Negative, and model also predicted as Negative.



          For better understanding, you can run a simple binary classfication model and analyze the confusion matrix.



          Thank you,
          KK






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$
















            1












            1








            1





            $begingroup$

            Please find the below:




            • False Negative (FN): prediction is NEGATIVE, actual outcome is POSITIVE, result is 'False Negative' - Why is that? Shouldn't it be 'False Positive'?

              Answer : The predictive model supposed to give the answer as 'Positive', but it predicted as 'Negative', which means Falsely predicted as Negative aka False Negative.


            • False Positive (FP): prediction is POSITIVE, actual outcome is NEGATIVE, result is 'False Positive' - Why is that? Shouldn't it be 'True Negative'?

              Answer : The predictive model supposed to give the answer as 'Negative', but it predicted as 'Positive', which means Falsely predicted as Positive aka False Positive.


            • True Negative (TN): prediction is NEGATIVE, actual outcome is NEGATIVE, result is 'True Negative' - Why is that? Shouldn't it be 'False Negative'?

              Answer : The predicted output supposed to be Negative, and model also predicted as Negative.



            For better understanding, you can run a simple binary classfication model and analyze the confusion matrix.



            Thank you,
            KK






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            Please find the below:




            • False Negative (FN): prediction is NEGATIVE, actual outcome is POSITIVE, result is 'False Negative' - Why is that? Shouldn't it be 'False Positive'?

              Answer : The predictive model supposed to give the answer as 'Positive', but it predicted as 'Negative', which means Falsely predicted as Negative aka False Negative.


            • False Positive (FP): prediction is POSITIVE, actual outcome is NEGATIVE, result is 'False Positive' - Why is that? Shouldn't it be 'True Negative'?

              Answer : The predictive model supposed to give the answer as 'Negative', but it predicted as 'Positive', which means Falsely predicted as Positive aka False Positive.


            • True Negative (TN): prediction is NEGATIVE, actual outcome is NEGATIVE, result is 'True Negative' - Why is that? Shouldn't it be 'False Negative'?

              Answer : The predicted output supposed to be Negative, and model also predicted as Negative.



            For better understanding, you can run a simple binary classfication model and analyze the confusion matrix.



            Thank you,
            KK







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered yesterday









            KK2491KK2491

            343219




            343219























                1












                $begingroup$

                Seems like you understand the meaning of the confusion matrix, nut not the logic used to name its entries!



                Here are my 5 cents:



                The names are all of this kind:



                <True/False> <Positive/Negative>
                | |
                Part1 Part2



                1. The first part explains if the prediction was right or not. If you have only True Positive and True Negative your model is perfect. If you have only False Positive and False Negative your model is really bad.


                2. The second part explains the prediction of the model.



                So:




                • False Negative (FN): the prediction is NEGATIVE (0) but the first part is False, this means that the prediction is wrong (should have been POSITIVE (1)).


                • False Positive (FP): the prediction is POSITIVE (1) but the first part is False, this means that the prediction is wrong (should have been NEGATIVE (0)).


                • True Negative (TN): prediction is NEGATIVE and the first part is True. The prediction is right (model predicted NEGATIVE, for NEGATIVE samples)







                share|improve this answer









                $endgroup$


















                  1












                  $begingroup$

                  Seems like you understand the meaning of the confusion matrix, nut not the logic used to name its entries!



                  Here are my 5 cents:



                  The names are all of this kind:



                  <True/False> <Positive/Negative>
                  | |
                  Part1 Part2



                  1. The first part explains if the prediction was right or not. If you have only True Positive and True Negative your model is perfect. If you have only False Positive and False Negative your model is really bad.


                  2. The second part explains the prediction of the model.



                  So:




                  • False Negative (FN): the prediction is NEGATIVE (0) but the first part is False, this means that the prediction is wrong (should have been POSITIVE (1)).


                  • False Positive (FP): the prediction is POSITIVE (1) but the first part is False, this means that the prediction is wrong (should have been NEGATIVE (0)).


                  • True Negative (TN): prediction is NEGATIVE and the first part is True. The prediction is right (model predicted NEGATIVE, for NEGATIVE samples)







                  share|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$
















                    1












                    1








                    1





                    $begingroup$

                    Seems like you understand the meaning of the confusion matrix, nut not the logic used to name its entries!



                    Here are my 5 cents:



                    The names are all of this kind:



                    <True/False> <Positive/Negative>
                    | |
                    Part1 Part2



                    1. The first part explains if the prediction was right or not. If you have only True Positive and True Negative your model is perfect. If you have only False Positive and False Negative your model is really bad.


                    2. The second part explains the prediction of the model.



                    So:




                    • False Negative (FN): the prediction is NEGATIVE (0) but the first part is False, this means that the prediction is wrong (should have been POSITIVE (1)).


                    • False Positive (FP): the prediction is POSITIVE (1) but the first part is False, this means that the prediction is wrong (should have been NEGATIVE (0)).


                    • True Negative (TN): prediction is NEGATIVE and the first part is True. The prediction is right (model predicted NEGATIVE, for NEGATIVE samples)







                    share|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$



                    Seems like you understand the meaning of the confusion matrix, nut not the logic used to name its entries!



                    Here are my 5 cents:



                    The names are all of this kind:



                    <True/False> <Positive/Negative>
                    | |
                    Part1 Part2



                    1. The first part explains if the prediction was right or not. If you have only True Positive and True Negative your model is perfect. If you have only False Positive and False Negative your model is really bad.


                    2. The second part explains the prediction of the model.



                    So:




                    • False Negative (FN): the prediction is NEGATIVE (0) but the first part is False, this means that the prediction is wrong (should have been POSITIVE (1)).


                    • False Positive (FP): the prediction is POSITIVE (1) but the first part is False, this means that the prediction is wrong (should have been NEGATIVE (0)).


                    • True Negative (TN): prediction is NEGATIVE and the first part is True. The prediction is right (model predicted NEGATIVE, for NEGATIVE samples)








                    share|improve this answer












                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer










                    answered yesterday









                    Francesco PegoraroFrancesco Pegoraro

                    56717




                    56717























                        0












                        $begingroup$


                        True means Correct, False means Incorrect.




                        True Positive (TP): Model predicts P, which is Correct.



                        False Positive (FP): Model predicts P, which is Incorrect, must have predicted N.



                        True Negative (TN): Model predicts N, which is Correct.



                        False Negative (FN): Model predicts N, which is Incorrect, must have predicted P.






                        share|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$


















                          0












                          $begingroup$


                          True means Correct, False means Incorrect.




                          True Positive (TP): Model predicts P, which is Correct.



                          False Positive (FP): Model predicts P, which is Incorrect, must have predicted N.



                          True Negative (TN): Model predicts N, which is Correct.



                          False Negative (FN): Model predicts N, which is Incorrect, must have predicted P.






                          share|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$
















                            0












                            0








                            0





                            $begingroup$


                            True means Correct, False means Incorrect.




                            True Positive (TP): Model predicts P, which is Correct.



                            False Positive (FP): Model predicts P, which is Incorrect, must have predicted N.



                            True Negative (TN): Model predicts N, which is Correct.



                            False Negative (FN): Model predicts N, which is Incorrect, must have predicted P.






                            share|improve this answer









                            $endgroup$




                            True means Correct, False means Incorrect.




                            True Positive (TP): Model predicts P, which is Correct.



                            False Positive (FP): Model predicts P, which is Incorrect, must have predicted N.



                            True Negative (TN): Model predicts N, which is Correct.



                            False Negative (FN): Model predicts N, which is Incorrect, must have predicted P.







                            share|improve this answer












                            share|improve this answer



                            share|improve this answer










                            answered yesterday









                            EsmailianEsmailian

                            1,686114




                            1,686114






















                                Tauno Tanilas is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










                                draft saved

                                draft discarded


















                                Tauno Tanilas is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













                                Tauno Tanilas is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                                Tauno Tanilas is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















                                Thanks for contributing an answer to Data Science Stack Exchange!


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid



                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function () {
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdatascience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f47725%2fconfusion-matrix-logic%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                }
                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown







                                Popular posts from this blog

                                數位音樂下載

                                When can things happen in Etherscan, such as the picture below?

                                格利澤436b