Regular polygon VS circle shapes in TikZ
This question is a kind of continuation this answer. There, it remains unclear which is the origin of the white space around the node content, if a square shape is used, and I would like to understand this. Given the following MWE
documentclass[tikz, border=1mm]{standalone}
usetikzlibrary{shapes.geometric}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}[every node/.style={draw, inner sep=0}]
node[regular polygon,regular polygon sides=4] (a) {XX};
node[regular polygon,regular polygon sides=100, blue] (b) {XX};
node[circle] (c) {XX};
foreach a in {north,south,east,west,north east,south east,north west,south west}{
fill[red] (a.a) circle(0.5pt);
fill[yellow] (b.a) circle(0.25pt);
fill[orange] (c.a) circle(0.25pt);
}
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
I am a bit surprised that the black circle has a radius which is smaller than that of the inscribed circle in the polygon, since the pgf
manual says
[...] the border of the polygon is always constructed using the
incircle, whose radius is calculated to tightly fit the node contents
(including anyinner sep
).
To show what I would have expected and what I would like to have I added a blue "fake circle" to the MWE as a regular polygon with 100 sides. Is there a way to draw such a blue circle using the circle shape, i.e. node[circle, ...]{XX};
? Playing by hand with inner sep
is not an option for me.
As clarification/additional information, I am interested in having a node shape to be used in a wider context, i.e. not in relation with the square. And also receiving an explanation about why the 4-sides polygon leaves so much space despite the inner sep=0
would be highly appreciated.
UPDATE: From the comments, indeed, there is some room of interpretation in the question. In short, I would like to answer these questions.
- How is it possible to have a
Circle
shape (orCircle
tikzstyle) that draws exactly the inscribed circle of the correspondentregular polygon
around a given node content? - Where does the discrepancy between black circle and square in my MWE come from?
- If easier (I can also use this other approach), how is it possible to have a
Regular Polygon
shape (or tikzstyle) that has as inscribed circle the correspondentcircle
around a given node content?
tikz-pgf
|
show 5 more comments
This question is a kind of continuation this answer. There, it remains unclear which is the origin of the white space around the node content, if a square shape is used, and I would like to understand this. Given the following MWE
documentclass[tikz, border=1mm]{standalone}
usetikzlibrary{shapes.geometric}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}[every node/.style={draw, inner sep=0}]
node[regular polygon,regular polygon sides=4] (a) {XX};
node[regular polygon,regular polygon sides=100, blue] (b) {XX};
node[circle] (c) {XX};
foreach a in {north,south,east,west,north east,south east,north west,south west}{
fill[red] (a.a) circle(0.5pt);
fill[yellow] (b.a) circle(0.25pt);
fill[orange] (c.a) circle(0.25pt);
}
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
I am a bit surprised that the black circle has a radius which is smaller than that of the inscribed circle in the polygon, since the pgf
manual says
[...] the border of the polygon is always constructed using the
incircle, whose radius is calculated to tightly fit the node contents
(including anyinner sep
).
To show what I would have expected and what I would like to have I added a blue "fake circle" to the MWE as a regular polygon with 100 sides. Is there a way to draw such a blue circle using the circle shape, i.e. node[circle, ...]{XX};
? Playing by hand with inner sep
is not an option for me.
As clarification/additional information, I am interested in having a node shape to be used in a wider context, i.e. not in relation with the square. And also receiving an explanation about why the 4-sides polygon leaves so much space despite the inner sep=0
would be highly appreciated.
UPDATE: From the comments, indeed, there is some room of interpretation in the question. In short, I would like to answer these questions.
- How is it possible to have a
Circle
shape (orCircle
tikzstyle) that draws exactly the inscribed circle of the correspondentregular polygon
around a given node content? - Where does the discrepancy between black circle and square in my MWE come from?
- If easier (I can also use this other approach), how is it possible to have a
Regular Polygon
shape (or tikzstyle) that has as inscribed circle the correspondentcircle
around a given node content?
tikz-pgf
You can see in the manual that for empty nodes the ratio issqrt(2)
(but I don't know why). In the manual a regular polygon with inner space equal to0.3535cm
(which issqrt(2)/4
) is tangent to circle with radius1/2 cm
.
– Kpym
yesterday
I had noticed that strangeinner sep
in the example. But I had also noticed that it was about an empty node. If I have an arbitrary node content, I would then need to adjust that0.3535cm
magic number (and I should think about how). Are you suggesting something like that?
– Axel Krypton
yesterday
1
Thissqrt(2)
factor does make sense if you assume the the content is approximately quadratic. And I do not understand the question. That is, I thought I did before I saw the answers. Could you perhaps indicate to which extent the answers address the question. I am really confused.
– marmot
yesterday
1
@marmot As I understand the answer is "How to draw a circular shape that has the same inner circle as all other regular polygons".
– Kpym
yesterday
1
@marmot I think that I have answered this par of the question : the the origin of the white space around the node content is that in the definition of theregular polygon
shape the inner radius is calculated differently from thecircle
shape (and the ratio between both depends on the shape, i.e. the aspect ratio).
– Kpym
yesterday
|
show 5 more comments
This question is a kind of continuation this answer. There, it remains unclear which is the origin of the white space around the node content, if a square shape is used, and I would like to understand this. Given the following MWE
documentclass[tikz, border=1mm]{standalone}
usetikzlibrary{shapes.geometric}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}[every node/.style={draw, inner sep=0}]
node[regular polygon,regular polygon sides=4] (a) {XX};
node[regular polygon,regular polygon sides=100, blue] (b) {XX};
node[circle] (c) {XX};
foreach a in {north,south,east,west,north east,south east,north west,south west}{
fill[red] (a.a) circle(0.5pt);
fill[yellow] (b.a) circle(0.25pt);
fill[orange] (c.a) circle(0.25pt);
}
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
I am a bit surprised that the black circle has a radius which is smaller than that of the inscribed circle in the polygon, since the pgf
manual says
[...] the border of the polygon is always constructed using the
incircle, whose radius is calculated to tightly fit the node contents
(including anyinner sep
).
To show what I would have expected and what I would like to have I added a blue "fake circle" to the MWE as a regular polygon with 100 sides. Is there a way to draw such a blue circle using the circle shape, i.e. node[circle, ...]{XX};
? Playing by hand with inner sep
is not an option for me.
As clarification/additional information, I am interested in having a node shape to be used in a wider context, i.e. not in relation with the square. And also receiving an explanation about why the 4-sides polygon leaves so much space despite the inner sep=0
would be highly appreciated.
UPDATE: From the comments, indeed, there is some room of interpretation in the question. In short, I would like to answer these questions.
- How is it possible to have a
Circle
shape (orCircle
tikzstyle) that draws exactly the inscribed circle of the correspondentregular polygon
around a given node content? - Where does the discrepancy between black circle and square in my MWE come from?
- If easier (I can also use this other approach), how is it possible to have a
Regular Polygon
shape (or tikzstyle) that has as inscribed circle the correspondentcircle
around a given node content?
tikz-pgf
This question is a kind of continuation this answer. There, it remains unclear which is the origin of the white space around the node content, if a square shape is used, and I would like to understand this. Given the following MWE
documentclass[tikz, border=1mm]{standalone}
usetikzlibrary{shapes.geometric}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}[every node/.style={draw, inner sep=0}]
node[regular polygon,regular polygon sides=4] (a) {XX};
node[regular polygon,regular polygon sides=100, blue] (b) {XX};
node[circle] (c) {XX};
foreach a in {north,south,east,west,north east,south east,north west,south west}{
fill[red] (a.a) circle(0.5pt);
fill[yellow] (b.a) circle(0.25pt);
fill[orange] (c.a) circle(0.25pt);
}
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
I am a bit surprised that the black circle has a radius which is smaller than that of the inscribed circle in the polygon, since the pgf
manual says
[...] the border of the polygon is always constructed using the
incircle, whose radius is calculated to tightly fit the node contents
(including anyinner sep
).
To show what I would have expected and what I would like to have I added a blue "fake circle" to the MWE as a regular polygon with 100 sides. Is there a way to draw such a blue circle using the circle shape, i.e. node[circle, ...]{XX};
? Playing by hand with inner sep
is not an option for me.
As clarification/additional information, I am interested in having a node shape to be used in a wider context, i.e. not in relation with the square. And also receiving an explanation about why the 4-sides polygon leaves so much space despite the inner sep=0
would be highly appreciated.
UPDATE: From the comments, indeed, there is some room of interpretation in the question. In short, I would like to answer these questions.
- How is it possible to have a
Circle
shape (orCircle
tikzstyle) that draws exactly the inscribed circle of the correspondentregular polygon
around a given node content? - Where does the discrepancy between black circle and square in my MWE come from?
- If easier (I can also use this other approach), how is it possible to have a
Regular Polygon
shape (or tikzstyle) that has as inscribed circle the correspondentcircle
around a given node content?
tikz-pgf
tikz-pgf
edited yesterday
Axel Krypton
asked yesterday
Axel KryptonAxel Krypton
460111
460111
You can see in the manual that for empty nodes the ratio issqrt(2)
(but I don't know why). In the manual a regular polygon with inner space equal to0.3535cm
(which issqrt(2)/4
) is tangent to circle with radius1/2 cm
.
– Kpym
yesterday
I had noticed that strangeinner sep
in the example. But I had also noticed that it was about an empty node. If I have an arbitrary node content, I would then need to adjust that0.3535cm
magic number (and I should think about how). Are you suggesting something like that?
– Axel Krypton
yesterday
1
Thissqrt(2)
factor does make sense if you assume the the content is approximately quadratic. And I do not understand the question. That is, I thought I did before I saw the answers. Could you perhaps indicate to which extent the answers address the question. I am really confused.
– marmot
yesterday
1
@marmot As I understand the answer is "How to draw a circular shape that has the same inner circle as all other regular polygons".
– Kpym
yesterday
1
@marmot I think that I have answered this par of the question : the the origin of the white space around the node content is that in the definition of theregular polygon
shape the inner radius is calculated differently from thecircle
shape (and the ratio between both depends on the shape, i.e. the aspect ratio).
– Kpym
yesterday
|
show 5 more comments
You can see in the manual that for empty nodes the ratio issqrt(2)
(but I don't know why). In the manual a regular polygon with inner space equal to0.3535cm
(which issqrt(2)/4
) is tangent to circle with radius1/2 cm
.
– Kpym
yesterday
I had noticed that strangeinner sep
in the example. But I had also noticed that it was about an empty node. If I have an arbitrary node content, I would then need to adjust that0.3535cm
magic number (and I should think about how). Are you suggesting something like that?
– Axel Krypton
yesterday
1
Thissqrt(2)
factor does make sense if you assume the the content is approximately quadratic. And I do not understand the question. That is, I thought I did before I saw the answers. Could you perhaps indicate to which extent the answers address the question. I am really confused.
– marmot
yesterday
1
@marmot As I understand the answer is "How to draw a circular shape that has the same inner circle as all other regular polygons".
– Kpym
yesterday
1
@marmot I think that I have answered this par of the question : the the origin of the white space around the node content is that in the definition of theregular polygon
shape the inner radius is calculated differently from thecircle
shape (and the ratio between both depends on the shape, i.e. the aspect ratio).
– Kpym
yesterday
You can see in the manual that for empty nodes the ratio is
sqrt(2)
(but I don't know why). In the manual a regular polygon with inner space equal to 0.3535cm
(which is sqrt(2)/4
) is tangent to circle with radius 1/2 cm
.– Kpym
yesterday
You can see in the manual that for empty nodes the ratio is
sqrt(2)
(but I don't know why). In the manual a regular polygon with inner space equal to 0.3535cm
(which is sqrt(2)/4
) is tangent to circle with radius 1/2 cm
.– Kpym
yesterday
I had noticed that strange
inner sep
in the example. But I had also noticed that it was about an empty node. If I have an arbitrary node content, I would then need to adjust that 0.3535cm
magic number (and I should think about how). Are you suggesting something like that?– Axel Krypton
yesterday
I had noticed that strange
inner sep
in the example. But I had also noticed that it was about an empty node. If I have an arbitrary node content, I would then need to adjust that 0.3535cm
magic number (and I should think about how). Are you suggesting something like that?– Axel Krypton
yesterday
1
1
This
sqrt(2)
factor does make sense if you assume the the content is approximately quadratic. And I do not understand the question. That is, I thought I did before I saw the answers. Could you perhaps indicate to which extent the answers address the question. I am really confused.– marmot
yesterday
This
sqrt(2)
factor does make sense if you assume the the content is approximately quadratic. And I do not understand the question. That is, I thought I did before I saw the answers. Could you perhaps indicate to which extent the answers address the question. I am really confused.– marmot
yesterday
1
1
@marmot As I understand the answer is "How to draw a circular shape that has the same inner circle as all other regular polygons".
– Kpym
yesterday
@marmot As I understand the answer is "How to draw a circular shape that has the same inner circle as all other regular polygons".
– Kpym
yesterday
1
1
@marmot I think that I have answered this par of the question : the the origin of the white space around the node content is that in the definition of the
regular polygon
shape the inner radius is calculated differently from the circle
shape (and the ratio between both depends on the shape, i.e. the aspect ratio).– Kpym
yesterday
@marmot I think that I have answered this par of the question : the the origin of the white space around the node content is that in the definition of the
regular polygon
shape the inner radius is calculated differently from the circle
shape (and the ratio between both depends on the shape, i.e. the aspect ratio).– Kpym
yesterday
|
show 5 more comments
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
The "inner circle" in shapes.geometric
has a radius that is half of the longest side of the content box plus the inner sep, and multiplied by 1.4142136
, which is approximately sqrt(2)
. So to obtain a circle shape that has this behavior you can define a new shape, let's say Circle
(with capital C) that is a slight modification of the existing ellipse
shape.
documentclass[tikz, border=7pt, convert={density=4200}]{standalone}
usetikzlibrary{shapes.geometric}
makeatletter
pgfdeclareshape{Circle}
%
% Draws a circle around the text
% (based on the original ellipse shape)
%
{%
savedanchorcenterpoint{%
pgf@x=.5wdpgfnodeparttextbox%
pgf@y=.5htpgfnodeparttextbox%
advancepgf@y by-.5dppgfnodeparttextbox%
}%
savedanchorradius{%
%
% Calculate ``height radius''
%
pgf@y=.5htpgfnodeparttextbox%
advancepgf@y by.5dppgfnodeparttextbox%
pgfmathsetlengthpgf@yb{pgfkeysvalueof{/pgf/inner ysep}}%
advancepgf@y bypgf@yb%
%
% Calculate ``width radius''
%
pgf@x=.5wdpgfnodeparttextbox%
pgfmathsetlengthpgf@xb{pgfkeysvalueof{/pgf/inner xsep}}%
advancepgf@x bypgf@xb%
%
% Adjust
%
% ==============================
% added to ellipse shape to become circle
ifdimpgf@y>pgf@x%
pgf@xpgf@y%
else%
pgf@ypgf@x%
fi%
% ==============================
pgf@x=1.4142136pgf@x%
pgf@y=1.4142136pgf@y%
%
% Adjust height, if necessary
%
pgfmathsetlengthpgf@yc{pgfkeysvalueof{/pgf/minimum height}}%
ifdimpgf@y<.5pgf@yc%
pgf@y=.5pgf@yc%
fi%
%
% Adjust width, if necessary
%
pgfmathsetlengthpgf@xc{pgfkeysvalueof{/pgf/minimum width}}%
ifdimpgf@x<.5pgf@xc%
pgf@x=.5pgf@xc%
fi%
%
% Add outer sep
%
pgfmathsetlength{pgf@xb}{pgfkeysvalueof{/pgf/outer xsep}}%
pgfmathsetlength{pgf@yb}{pgfkeysvalueof{/pgf/outer ysep}}%
advancepgf@x bypgf@xb%
advancepgf@y bypgf@yb%
}%
%
% Anchors
%
anchor{center}{centerpoint}%
anchor{mid}{centerpointpgfmathsetlengthpgf@y{.5ex}}%
anchor{base}{centerpointpgf@y=0pt}%
anchor{north}
{
pgf@process{radius}
pgf@ya=pgf@y%
pgf@process{centerpoint}
advancepgf@y bypgf@ya
}%
anchor{south}
{
pgf@process{radius}
pgf@ya=pgf@y%
pgf@process{centerpoint}
advancepgf@y by-pgf@ya
}%
anchor{west}
{
pgf@process{radius}
pgf@xa=pgf@x%
pgf@process{centerpoint}
advancepgf@x by-pgf@xa
}%
anchor{mid west}
{%
pgf@process{radius}
pgf@xa=pgf@x%
pgf@process{centerpoint}
advancepgf@x by-pgf@xa%
pgfmathsetlengthpgf@y{.5ex}
}%
anchor{base west}
{%
pgf@process{radius}
pgf@xa=pgf@x%
pgf@process{centerpoint}
advancepgf@x by-pgf@xa%
pgf@y=0pt
}%
anchor{north west}
{
pgf@process{radius}
pgf@xa=pgf@x%
pgf@ya=pgf@y%
pgf@process{centerpoint}
advancepgf@x by-0.707107pgf@xa
advancepgf@y by0.707107pgf@ya
}%
anchor{south west}
{
pgf@process{radius}
pgf@xa=pgf@x%
pgf@ya=pgf@y%
pgf@process{centerpoint}
advancepgf@x by-0.707107pgf@xa
advancepgf@y by-0.707107pgf@ya
}%
anchor{east}
{%
pgf@process{radius}
pgf@xa=pgf@x%
pgf@process{centerpoint}
advancepgf@x bypgf@xa
}%
anchor{mid east}
{%
pgf@process{radius}
pgf@xa=pgf@x%
pgf@process{centerpoint}
advancepgf@x bypgf@xa%
pgfmathsetlengthpgf@y{.5ex}
}%
anchor{base east}
{%
pgf@process{radius}
pgf@xa=pgf@x%
pgf@process{centerpoint}
advancepgf@x bypgf@xa%
pgf@y=0pt
}%
anchor{north east}
{
pgf@process{radius}
pgf@xa=pgf@x%
pgf@ya=pgf@y%
pgf@process{centerpoint}
advancepgf@x by0.707107pgf@xa
advancepgf@y by0.707107pgf@ya
}%
anchor{south east}
{
pgf@process{radius}
pgf@xa=pgf@x%
pgf@ya=pgf@y%
pgf@process{centerpoint}
advancepgf@x by0.707107pgf@xa
advancepgf@y by-0.707107pgf@ya
}%
anchorborder{
edefpgf@marshal{%
noexpandpgfpointborderellipse
{noexpandpgfqpoint{thepgf@x}{thepgf@y}}
{noexpandradius}%
}%
pgf@marshal%
pgf@xa=pgf@x%
pgf@ya=pgf@y%
centerpoint%
advancepgf@x bypgf@xa%
advancepgf@y bypgf@ya%
}%
%
% Background path
%
backgroundpath
{
pgf@process{radius}%
pgfutil@tempdima=pgf@x%
pgfutil@tempdimb=pgf@y%
pgfmathsetlength{pgf@xb}{pgfkeysvalueof{/pgf/outer xsep}}%
pgfmathsetlength{pgf@yb}{pgfkeysvalueof{/pgf/outer ysep}}%
advancepgfutil@tempdima by-pgf@xb%
advancepgfutil@tempdimb by-pgf@yb%
pgfpathellipse{centerpoint}{pgfqpoint{pgfutil@tempdima}{0pt}}{pgfqpoint{0pt}{pgfutil@tempdimb}}%
}%
}%
makeatother
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}[nodes={draw, inner sep=0}]
node[regular polygon,regular polygon sides=4] (a) {XX};
node[Circle, blue] (b) {XX};
node[circle] (c) {XX};
foreach a in {north,south,east,west,north east,south east,north west,south west}{
fill[red] (a.a) circle(0.5pt);
fill[yellow] (b.a) circle(0.25pt);
fill[orange] (c.a) circle(0.25pt);
}
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
Addendum:
If you want to go the other way and create a circumscribed polygon around the standard circle
node style, that do not use low level tricks, you can define circumscribed polygon
that use append after command
to add well sized regular polygon
. This is not a robust code for meany reasons, it is just a proof of concept :
documentclass[tikz,border=7pt,convert={density=4200}]{standalone}
usetikzlibrary{calc,shapes.geometric}
% don't tell me to not use tikzstyle ;)
tikzstyle{circumscribed polygon}[draw]=[
circle,draw=none,fill=none,shade=none,
append after command={
let p1=($(tikzlastnode.west)-(tikzlastnode.east)$),
n1 = {(veclen(p1)-pgflinewidth)/2.828427} % 2*sqrt(2) = 2.8284271247461903
in
(tikzlastnode.center) node[regular polygon, inner sep=n1, #1]{}
}
]
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}[inner sep=1mm]
foreach~in {3,...,7}
node[circumscribed polygon={draw=blue!~0!green,regular polygon sides=~}] {XX};
node[circle,draw=red] {XX};
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
Very enlightening. I wonder if, then, rather than defining a completely new shape, it is not easier to find out a systematic way to give a proper, automatically determinedinner separation
to a normalcircle
. Analogously one could give an automatically determined negativeinner sep
to aregular polygon
. I will think about it, but you helped already a lot!
– Axel Krypton
yesterday
And I would also say that thepgf
inherit...[from=ellipse]
commands might be useful to shorten the code, but I have to still explore this world and I might be completely wrong.
– Axel Krypton
yesterday
Thanks for the added information, very useful, indeed. I came up with a slightly differentCircle
and I shared this in a separate answer. :)
– Axel Krypton
20 hours ago
add a comment |
Using through
library of Tikz.
documentclass[tikz, border=1mm]{standalone}
usetikzlibrary{shapes.geometric,through}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}[every node/.style={draw, inner sep=0}]
node[regular polygon,regular polygon sides=4] (a) {XX};
node (b) [draw,blue, circle through=(a.north)] at (a.center) {XX};
node[circle] (c) {XX};
foreach a in {north,south,east,west,north east,south east,north west,south west}{
fill[red] (a.a) circle(0.5pt);
fill[yellow] (b.a) circle(0.25pt);
fill[orange] (c.a) circle(0.25pt);
}
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
Although strictly speaking you proposed a valid way to draw the blue circle, I was more interested in a general way to draw that shape for a node, without having to rely to another node/point (see edit question). The only way I see I could use your idea is to always have two nodes, one invisible and one that would be the node I wish. However, this is not what I am looking for.
– Axel Krypton
yesterday
add a comment |
Just to share a different way to achieve what Kpym did in his very nice answer declaring a new shape, I thought one could have simply a Circle
style which sets properly the minimum size of a circle shape (in this particular case it is always true that the content will never exceed the minimum size
since we are trying to enlarge the circle). It should work for any node content, no matter if its width is larger than its height or vice-versa. A couple of remarks:
- In this approach the node name and the node position must be declared before the options or inside them using the
name
andat
keys, respectively. - A
Circle
inner sep
has to be specified before theCircle
style, but it might easily be improved, if needed otherwise.
Here the code:
documentclass[tikz, border=1mm]{standalone}
usetikzlibrary{shapes.geometric}
tikzset{%
Square/.style={regular polygon, regular polygon sides=4},
Circle/.style={%
circle,
/utils/exec={%
pgfmathsetmacropolygonIncircleDiameter{
sqrt(2)*max(width("#1")+2*pgfshapeinnerxsep, height("#1") + depth("#1") + 2 * pgfshapeinnerysep)
}
},
minimum size=polygonIncircleDiameter,
node contents={#1}
}
}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
node[inner sep=0, Square, draw=cyan] at (0,0) {xx};
node[inner sep=0, Circle={xx}, draw=blue];
node[Square, draw=cyan] at (1,0) {i};
node[Circle={i}, draw=blue, at={(1,0)}];
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
Very nice ! Two remarks : it would be nice to not pass the node content as parameter toCircle
but I think that this will be tricky, and probablypolygonIncircleDiameter
is better than to divide and then multiply by 2 thepolygonIncircleRadius
.
– Kpym
19 hours ago
I implemented your suggestion, it definitely makes sense! :) About not passing the node content to the style, well, honestly I would not know how to then achieve the same result. Yes, it definitely looks tricky to me.
– Axel Krypton
19 hours ago
add a comment |
This wraps a polyogon around the circle.
documentclass[tikz,border=3.14mm]{standalone}
usetikzlibrary{calc}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}[every node/.style={draw, inner sep=0},
polygon with circle/.style args={#1 inscribed and #2 corners}{insert path={%
let p1=($(#1.0)-(#1.center)$),n1={abs(x1)/cos(180/#2)}
in ($(#1.center)+(0:n1)$)
foreach X in {1,...,numexpr#2-1}
{ -- ($(#1.center)+({360*X/#2}:n1)$) }-- cycle}}]
node[circle] (c) {XX};
draw[blue,polygon with circle=c inscribed and 12 corners] ;
foreach a in {north,south,east,west,north east,south east,north west,south west}{
fill[orange] (c.a) circle(0.25pt);
}
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
add a comment |
This solution uses calc
library to compute regular polygon's inner radius. This way it's possible to compute circunscribed circle's minimum width.
documentclass[tikz, border=1mm]{standalone}
usetikzlibrary{shapes.geometric, calc}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
node[inner sep=0, regular polygon, regular polygon sides=4, draw=cyan] (a) {xx};
path let p1=($(a.center)-(a.side 1)$) in node[circle, inner sep=0, minimum width={2*veclen(x1,y1)-pgflinewidth}, draw=blue] {};
node[inner sep=0, draw=cyan, regular polygon, regular polygon sides=7] (b) at (1,0) {i};
path let p1=($(b.center)-(b.side 1)$) in node[circle, inner sep=0, minimum width={2*veclen(x1,y1)-pgflinewidth}, draw=blue] at (b) {};
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f480661%2fregular-polygon-vs-circle-shapes-in-tikz%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The "inner circle" in shapes.geometric
has a radius that is half of the longest side of the content box plus the inner sep, and multiplied by 1.4142136
, which is approximately sqrt(2)
. So to obtain a circle shape that has this behavior you can define a new shape, let's say Circle
(with capital C) that is a slight modification of the existing ellipse
shape.
documentclass[tikz, border=7pt, convert={density=4200}]{standalone}
usetikzlibrary{shapes.geometric}
makeatletter
pgfdeclareshape{Circle}
%
% Draws a circle around the text
% (based on the original ellipse shape)
%
{%
savedanchorcenterpoint{%
pgf@x=.5wdpgfnodeparttextbox%
pgf@y=.5htpgfnodeparttextbox%
advancepgf@y by-.5dppgfnodeparttextbox%
}%
savedanchorradius{%
%
% Calculate ``height radius''
%
pgf@y=.5htpgfnodeparttextbox%
advancepgf@y by.5dppgfnodeparttextbox%
pgfmathsetlengthpgf@yb{pgfkeysvalueof{/pgf/inner ysep}}%
advancepgf@y bypgf@yb%
%
% Calculate ``width radius''
%
pgf@x=.5wdpgfnodeparttextbox%
pgfmathsetlengthpgf@xb{pgfkeysvalueof{/pgf/inner xsep}}%
advancepgf@x bypgf@xb%
%
% Adjust
%
% ==============================
% added to ellipse shape to become circle
ifdimpgf@y>pgf@x%
pgf@xpgf@y%
else%
pgf@ypgf@x%
fi%
% ==============================
pgf@x=1.4142136pgf@x%
pgf@y=1.4142136pgf@y%
%
% Adjust height, if necessary
%
pgfmathsetlengthpgf@yc{pgfkeysvalueof{/pgf/minimum height}}%
ifdimpgf@y<.5pgf@yc%
pgf@y=.5pgf@yc%
fi%
%
% Adjust width, if necessary
%
pgfmathsetlengthpgf@xc{pgfkeysvalueof{/pgf/minimum width}}%
ifdimpgf@x<.5pgf@xc%
pgf@x=.5pgf@xc%
fi%
%
% Add outer sep
%
pgfmathsetlength{pgf@xb}{pgfkeysvalueof{/pgf/outer xsep}}%
pgfmathsetlength{pgf@yb}{pgfkeysvalueof{/pgf/outer ysep}}%
advancepgf@x bypgf@xb%
advancepgf@y bypgf@yb%
}%
%
% Anchors
%
anchor{center}{centerpoint}%
anchor{mid}{centerpointpgfmathsetlengthpgf@y{.5ex}}%
anchor{base}{centerpointpgf@y=0pt}%
anchor{north}
{
pgf@process{radius}
pgf@ya=pgf@y%
pgf@process{centerpoint}
advancepgf@y bypgf@ya
}%
anchor{south}
{
pgf@process{radius}
pgf@ya=pgf@y%
pgf@process{centerpoint}
advancepgf@y by-pgf@ya
}%
anchor{west}
{
pgf@process{radius}
pgf@xa=pgf@x%
pgf@process{centerpoint}
advancepgf@x by-pgf@xa
}%
anchor{mid west}
{%
pgf@process{radius}
pgf@xa=pgf@x%
pgf@process{centerpoint}
advancepgf@x by-pgf@xa%
pgfmathsetlengthpgf@y{.5ex}
}%
anchor{base west}
{%
pgf@process{radius}
pgf@xa=pgf@x%
pgf@process{centerpoint}
advancepgf@x by-pgf@xa%
pgf@y=0pt
}%
anchor{north west}
{
pgf@process{radius}
pgf@xa=pgf@x%
pgf@ya=pgf@y%
pgf@process{centerpoint}
advancepgf@x by-0.707107pgf@xa
advancepgf@y by0.707107pgf@ya
}%
anchor{south west}
{
pgf@process{radius}
pgf@xa=pgf@x%
pgf@ya=pgf@y%
pgf@process{centerpoint}
advancepgf@x by-0.707107pgf@xa
advancepgf@y by-0.707107pgf@ya
}%
anchor{east}
{%
pgf@process{radius}
pgf@xa=pgf@x%
pgf@process{centerpoint}
advancepgf@x bypgf@xa
}%
anchor{mid east}
{%
pgf@process{radius}
pgf@xa=pgf@x%
pgf@process{centerpoint}
advancepgf@x bypgf@xa%
pgfmathsetlengthpgf@y{.5ex}
}%
anchor{base east}
{%
pgf@process{radius}
pgf@xa=pgf@x%
pgf@process{centerpoint}
advancepgf@x bypgf@xa%
pgf@y=0pt
}%
anchor{north east}
{
pgf@process{radius}
pgf@xa=pgf@x%
pgf@ya=pgf@y%
pgf@process{centerpoint}
advancepgf@x by0.707107pgf@xa
advancepgf@y by0.707107pgf@ya
}%
anchor{south east}
{
pgf@process{radius}
pgf@xa=pgf@x%
pgf@ya=pgf@y%
pgf@process{centerpoint}
advancepgf@x by0.707107pgf@xa
advancepgf@y by-0.707107pgf@ya
}%
anchorborder{
edefpgf@marshal{%
noexpandpgfpointborderellipse
{noexpandpgfqpoint{thepgf@x}{thepgf@y}}
{noexpandradius}%
}%
pgf@marshal%
pgf@xa=pgf@x%
pgf@ya=pgf@y%
centerpoint%
advancepgf@x bypgf@xa%
advancepgf@y bypgf@ya%
}%
%
% Background path
%
backgroundpath
{
pgf@process{radius}%
pgfutil@tempdima=pgf@x%
pgfutil@tempdimb=pgf@y%
pgfmathsetlength{pgf@xb}{pgfkeysvalueof{/pgf/outer xsep}}%
pgfmathsetlength{pgf@yb}{pgfkeysvalueof{/pgf/outer ysep}}%
advancepgfutil@tempdima by-pgf@xb%
advancepgfutil@tempdimb by-pgf@yb%
pgfpathellipse{centerpoint}{pgfqpoint{pgfutil@tempdima}{0pt}}{pgfqpoint{0pt}{pgfutil@tempdimb}}%
}%
}%
makeatother
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}[nodes={draw, inner sep=0}]
node[regular polygon,regular polygon sides=4] (a) {XX};
node[Circle, blue] (b) {XX};
node[circle] (c) {XX};
foreach a in {north,south,east,west,north east,south east,north west,south west}{
fill[red] (a.a) circle(0.5pt);
fill[yellow] (b.a) circle(0.25pt);
fill[orange] (c.a) circle(0.25pt);
}
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
Addendum:
If you want to go the other way and create a circumscribed polygon around the standard circle
node style, that do not use low level tricks, you can define circumscribed polygon
that use append after command
to add well sized regular polygon
. This is not a robust code for meany reasons, it is just a proof of concept :
documentclass[tikz,border=7pt,convert={density=4200}]{standalone}
usetikzlibrary{calc,shapes.geometric}
% don't tell me to not use tikzstyle ;)
tikzstyle{circumscribed polygon}[draw]=[
circle,draw=none,fill=none,shade=none,
append after command={
let p1=($(tikzlastnode.west)-(tikzlastnode.east)$),
n1 = {(veclen(p1)-pgflinewidth)/2.828427} % 2*sqrt(2) = 2.8284271247461903
in
(tikzlastnode.center) node[regular polygon, inner sep=n1, #1]{}
}
]
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}[inner sep=1mm]
foreach~in {3,...,7}
node[circumscribed polygon={draw=blue!~0!green,regular polygon sides=~}] {XX};
node[circle,draw=red] {XX};
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
Very enlightening. I wonder if, then, rather than defining a completely new shape, it is not easier to find out a systematic way to give a proper, automatically determinedinner separation
to a normalcircle
. Analogously one could give an automatically determined negativeinner sep
to aregular polygon
. I will think about it, but you helped already a lot!
– Axel Krypton
yesterday
And I would also say that thepgf
inherit...[from=ellipse]
commands might be useful to shorten the code, but I have to still explore this world and I might be completely wrong.
– Axel Krypton
yesterday
Thanks for the added information, very useful, indeed. I came up with a slightly differentCircle
and I shared this in a separate answer. :)
– Axel Krypton
20 hours ago
add a comment |
The "inner circle" in shapes.geometric
has a radius that is half of the longest side of the content box plus the inner sep, and multiplied by 1.4142136
, which is approximately sqrt(2)
. So to obtain a circle shape that has this behavior you can define a new shape, let's say Circle
(with capital C) that is a slight modification of the existing ellipse
shape.
documentclass[tikz, border=7pt, convert={density=4200}]{standalone}
usetikzlibrary{shapes.geometric}
makeatletter
pgfdeclareshape{Circle}
%
% Draws a circle around the text
% (based on the original ellipse shape)
%
{%
savedanchorcenterpoint{%
pgf@x=.5wdpgfnodeparttextbox%
pgf@y=.5htpgfnodeparttextbox%
advancepgf@y by-.5dppgfnodeparttextbox%
}%
savedanchorradius{%
%
% Calculate ``height radius''
%
pgf@y=.5htpgfnodeparttextbox%
advancepgf@y by.5dppgfnodeparttextbox%
pgfmathsetlengthpgf@yb{pgfkeysvalueof{/pgf/inner ysep}}%
advancepgf@y bypgf@yb%
%
% Calculate ``width radius''
%
pgf@x=.5wdpgfnodeparttextbox%
pgfmathsetlengthpgf@xb{pgfkeysvalueof{/pgf/inner xsep}}%
advancepgf@x bypgf@xb%
%
% Adjust
%
% ==============================
% added to ellipse shape to become circle
ifdimpgf@y>pgf@x%
pgf@xpgf@y%
else%
pgf@ypgf@x%
fi%
% ==============================
pgf@x=1.4142136pgf@x%
pgf@y=1.4142136pgf@y%
%
% Adjust height, if necessary
%
pgfmathsetlengthpgf@yc{pgfkeysvalueof{/pgf/minimum height}}%
ifdimpgf@y<.5pgf@yc%
pgf@y=.5pgf@yc%
fi%
%
% Adjust width, if necessary
%
pgfmathsetlengthpgf@xc{pgfkeysvalueof{/pgf/minimum width}}%
ifdimpgf@x<.5pgf@xc%
pgf@x=.5pgf@xc%
fi%
%
% Add outer sep
%
pgfmathsetlength{pgf@xb}{pgfkeysvalueof{/pgf/outer xsep}}%
pgfmathsetlength{pgf@yb}{pgfkeysvalueof{/pgf/outer ysep}}%
advancepgf@x bypgf@xb%
advancepgf@y bypgf@yb%
}%
%
% Anchors
%
anchor{center}{centerpoint}%
anchor{mid}{centerpointpgfmathsetlengthpgf@y{.5ex}}%
anchor{base}{centerpointpgf@y=0pt}%
anchor{north}
{
pgf@process{radius}
pgf@ya=pgf@y%
pgf@process{centerpoint}
advancepgf@y bypgf@ya
}%
anchor{south}
{
pgf@process{radius}
pgf@ya=pgf@y%
pgf@process{centerpoint}
advancepgf@y by-pgf@ya
}%
anchor{west}
{
pgf@process{radius}
pgf@xa=pgf@x%
pgf@process{centerpoint}
advancepgf@x by-pgf@xa
}%
anchor{mid west}
{%
pgf@process{radius}
pgf@xa=pgf@x%
pgf@process{centerpoint}
advancepgf@x by-pgf@xa%
pgfmathsetlengthpgf@y{.5ex}
}%
anchor{base west}
{%
pgf@process{radius}
pgf@xa=pgf@x%
pgf@process{centerpoint}
advancepgf@x by-pgf@xa%
pgf@y=0pt
}%
anchor{north west}
{
pgf@process{radius}
pgf@xa=pgf@x%
pgf@ya=pgf@y%
pgf@process{centerpoint}
advancepgf@x by-0.707107pgf@xa
advancepgf@y by0.707107pgf@ya
}%
anchor{south west}
{
pgf@process{radius}
pgf@xa=pgf@x%
pgf@ya=pgf@y%
pgf@process{centerpoint}
advancepgf@x by-0.707107pgf@xa
advancepgf@y by-0.707107pgf@ya
}%
anchor{east}
{%
pgf@process{radius}
pgf@xa=pgf@x%
pgf@process{centerpoint}
advancepgf@x bypgf@xa
}%
anchor{mid east}
{%
pgf@process{radius}
pgf@xa=pgf@x%
pgf@process{centerpoint}
advancepgf@x bypgf@xa%
pgfmathsetlengthpgf@y{.5ex}
}%
anchor{base east}
{%
pgf@process{radius}
pgf@xa=pgf@x%
pgf@process{centerpoint}
advancepgf@x bypgf@xa%
pgf@y=0pt
}%
anchor{north east}
{
pgf@process{radius}
pgf@xa=pgf@x%
pgf@ya=pgf@y%
pgf@process{centerpoint}
advancepgf@x by0.707107pgf@xa
advancepgf@y by0.707107pgf@ya
}%
anchor{south east}
{
pgf@process{radius}
pgf@xa=pgf@x%
pgf@ya=pgf@y%
pgf@process{centerpoint}
advancepgf@x by0.707107pgf@xa
advancepgf@y by-0.707107pgf@ya
}%
anchorborder{
edefpgf@marshal{%
noexpandpgfpointborderellipse
{noexpandpgfqpoint{thepgf@x}{thepgf@y}}
{noexpandradius}%
}%
pgf@marshal%
pgf@xa=pgf@x%
pgf@ya=pgf@y%
centerpoint%
advancepgf@x bypgf@xa%
advancepgf@y bypgf@ya%
}%
%
% Background path
%
backgroundpath
{
pgf@process{radius}%
pgfutil@tempdima=pgf@x%
pgfutil@tempdimb=pgf@y%
pgfmathsetlength{pgf@xb}{pgfkeysvalueof{/pgf/outer xsep}}%
pgfmathsetlength{pgf@yb}{pgfkeysvalueof{/pgf/outer ysep}}%
advancepgfutil@tempdima by-pgf@xb%
advancepgfutil@tempdimb by-pgf@yb%
pgfpathellipse{centerpoint}{pgfqpoint{pgfutil@tempdima}{0pt}}{pgfqpoint{0pt}{pgfutil@tempdimb}}%
}%
}%
makeatother
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}[nodes={draw, inner sep=0}]
node[regular polygon,regular polygon sides=4] (a) {XX};
node[Circle, blue] (b) {XX};
node[circle] (c) {XX};
foreach a in {north,south,east,west,north east,south east,north west,south west}{
fill[red] (a.a) circle(0.5pt);
fill[yellow] (b.a) circle(0.25pt);
fill[orange] (c.a) circle(0.25pt);
}
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
Addendum:
If you want to go the other way and create a circumscribed polygon around the standard circle
node style, that do not use low level tricks, you can define circumscribed polygon
that use append after command
to add well sized regular polygon
. This is not a robust code for meany reasons, it is just a proof of concept :
documentclass[tikz,border=7pt,convert={density=4200}]{standalone}
usetikzlibrary{calc,shapes.geometric}
% don't tell me to not use tikzstyle ;)
tikzstyle{circumscribed polygon}[draw]=[
circle,draw=none,fill=none,shade=none,
append after command={
let p1=($(tikzlastnode.west)-(tikzlastnode.east)$),
n1 = {(veclen(p1)-pgflinewidth)/2.828427} % 2*sqrt(2) = 2.8284271247461903
in
(tikzlastnode.center) node[regular polygon, inner sep=n1, #1]{}
}
]
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}[inner sep=1mm]
foreach~in {3,...,7}
node[circumscribed polygon={draw=blue!~0!green,regular polygon sides=~}] {XX};
node[circle,draw=red] {XX};
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
Very enlightening. I wonder if, then, rather than defining a completely new shape, it is not easier to find out a systematic way to give a proper, automatically determinedinner separation
to a normalcircle
. Analogously one could give an automatically determined negativeinner sep
to aregular polygon
. I will think about it, but you helped already a lot!
– Axel Krypton
yesterday
And I would also say that thepgf
inherit...[from=ellipse]
commands might be useful to shorten the code, but I have to still explore this world and I might be completely wrong.
– Axel Krypton
yesterday
Thanks for the added information, very useful, indeed. I came up with a slightly differentCircle
and I shared this in a separate answer. :)
– Axel Krypton
20 hours ago
add a comment |
The "inner circle" in shapes.geometric
has a radius that is half of the longest side of the content box plus the inner sep, and multiplied by 1.4142136
, which is approximately sqrt(2)
. So to obtain a circle shape that has this behavior you can define a new shape, let's say Circle
(with capital C) that is a slight modification of the existing ellipse
shape.
documentclass[tikz, border=7pt, convert={density=4200}]{standalone}
usetikzlibrary{shapes.geometric}
makeatletter
pgfdeclareshape{Circle}
%
% Draws a circle around the text
% (based on the original ellipse shape)
%
{%
savedanchorcenterpoint{%
pgf@x=.5wdpgfnodeparttextbox%
pgf@y=.5htpgfnodeparttextbox%
advancepgf@y by-.5dppgfnodeparttextbox%
}%
savedanchorradius{%
%
% Calculate ``height radius''
%
pgf@y=.5htpgfnodeparttextbox%
advancepgf@y by.5dppgfnodeparttextbox%
pgfmathsetlengthpgf@yb{pgfkeysvalueof{/pgf/inner ysep}}%
advancepgf@y bypgf@yb%
%
% Calculate ``width radius''
%
pgf@x=.5wdpgfnodeparttextbox%
pgfmathsetlengthpgf@xb{pgfkeysvalueof{/pgf/inner xsep}}%
advancepgf@x bypgf@xb%
%
% Adjust
%
% ==============================
% added to ellipse shape to become circle
ifdimpgf@y>pgf@x%
pgf@xpgf@y%
else%
pgf@ypgf@x%
fi%
% ==============================
pgf@x=1.4142136pgf@x%
pgf@y=1.4142136pgf@y%
%
% Adjust height, if necessary
%
pgfmathsetlengthpgf@yc{pgfkeysvalueof{/pgf/minimum height}}%
ifdimpgf@y<.5pgf@yc%
pgf@y=.5pgf@yc%
fi%
%
% Adjust width, if necessary
%
pgfmathsetlengthpgf@xc{pgfkeysvalueof{/pgf/minimum width}}%
ifdimpgf@x<.5pgf@xc%
pgf@x=.5pgf@xc%
fi%
%
% Add outer sep
%
pgfmathsetlength{pgf@xb}{pgfkeysvalueof{/pgf/outer xsep}}%
pgfmathsetlength{pgf@yb}{pgfkeysvalueof{/pgf/outer ysep}}%
advancepgf@x bypgf@xb%
advancepgf@y bypgf@yb%
}%
%
% Anchors
%
anchor{center}{centerpoint}%
anchor{mid}{centerpointpgfmathsetlengthpgf@y{.5ex}}%
anchor{base}{centerpointpgf@y=0pt}%
anchor{north}
{
pgf@process{radius}
pgf@ya=pgf@y%
pgf@process{centerpoint}
advancepgf@y bypgf@ya
}%
anchor{south}
{
pgf@process{radius}
pgf@ya=pgf@y%
pgf@process{centerpoint}
advancepgf@y by-pgf@ya
}%
anchor{west}
{
pgf@process{radius}
pgf@xa=pgf@x%
pgf@process{centerpoint}
advancepgf@x by-pgf@xa
}%
anchor{mid west}
{%
pgf@process{radius}
pgf@xa=pgf@x%
pgf@process{centerpoint}
advancepgf@x by-pgf@xa%
pgfmathsetlengthpgf@y{.5ex}
}%
anchor{base west}
{%
pgf@process{radius}
pgf@xa=pgf@x%
pgf@process{centerpoint}
advancepgf@x by-pgf@xa%
pgf@y=0pt
}%
anchor{north west}
{
pgf@process{radius}
pgf@xa=pgf@x%
pgf@ya=pgf@y%
pgf@process{centerpoint}
advancepgf@x by-0.707107pgf@xa
advancepgf@y by0.707107pgf@ya
}%
anchor{south west}
{
pgf@process{radius}
pgf@xa=pgf@x%
pgf@ya=pgf@y%
pgf@process{centerpoint}
advancepgf@x by-0.707107pgf@xa
advancepgf@y by-0.707107pgf@ya
}%
anchor{east}
{%
pgf@process{radius}
pgf@xa=pgf@x%
pgf@process{centerpoint}
advancepgf@x bypgf@xa
}%
anchor{mid east}
{%
pgf@process{radius}
pgf@xa=pgf@x%
pgf@process{centerpoint}
advancepgf@x bypgf@xa%
pgfmathsetlengthpgf@y{.5ex}
}%
anchor{base east}
{%
pgf@process{radius}
pgf@xa=pgf@x%
pgf@process{centerpoint}
advancepgf@x bypgf@xa%
pgf@y=0pt
}%
anchor{north east}
{
pgf@process{radius}
pgf@xa=pgf@x%
pgf@ya=pgf@y%
pgf@process{centerpoint}
advancepgf@x by0.707107pgf@xa
advancepgf@y by0.707107pgf@ya
}%
anchor{south east}
{
pgf@process{radius}
pgf@xa=pgf@x%
pgf@ya=pgf@y%
pgf@process{centerpoint}
advancepgf@x by0.707107pgf@xa
advancepgf@y by-0.707107pgf@ya
}%
anchorborder{
edefpgf@marshal{%
noexpandpgfpointborderellipse
{noexpandpgfqpoint{thepgf@x}{thepgf@y}}
{noexpandradius}%
}%
pgf@marshal%
pgf@xa=pgf@x%
pgf@ya=pgf@y%
centerpoint%
advancepgf@x bypgf@xa%
advancepgf@y bypgf@ya%
}%
%
% Background path
%
backgroundpath
{
pgf@process{radius}%
pgfutil@tempdima=pgf@x%
pgfutil@tempdimb=pgf@y%
pgfmathsetlength{pgf@xb}{pgfkeysvalueof{/pgf/outer xsep}}%
pgfmathsetlength{pgf@yb}{pgfkeysvalueof{/pgf/outer ysep}}%
advancepgfutil@tempdima by-pgf@xb%
advancepgfutil@tempdimb by-pgf@yb%
pgfpathellipse{centerpoint}{pgfqpoint{pgfutil@tempdima}{0pt}}{pgfqpoint{0pt}{pgfutil@tempdimb}}%
}%
}%
makeatother
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}[nodes={draw, inner sep=0}]
node[regular polygon,regular polygon sides=4] (a) {XX};
node[Circle, blue] (b) {XX};
node[circle] (c) {XX};
foreach a in {north,south,east,west,north east,south east,north west,south west}{
fill[red] (a.a) circle(0.5pt);
fill[yellow] (b.a) circle(0.25pt);
fill[orange] (c.a) circle(0.25pt);
}
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
Addendum:
If you want to go the other way and create a circumscribed polygon around the standard circle
node style, that do not use low level tricks, you can define circumscribed polygon
that use append after command
to add well sized regular polygon
. This is not a robust code for meany reasons, it is just a proof of concept :
documentclass[tikz,border=7pt,convert={density=4200}]{standalone}
usetikzlibrary{calc,shapes.geometric}
% don't tell me to not use tikzstyle ;)
tikzstyle{circumscribed polygon}[draw]=[
circle,draw=none,fill=none,shade=none,
append after command={
let p1=($(tikzlastnode.west)-(tikzlastnode.east)$),
n1 = {(veclen(p1)-pgflinewidth)/2.828427} % 2*sqrt(2) = 2.8284271247461903
in
(tikzlastnode.center) node[regular polygon, inner sep=n1, #1]{}
}
]
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}[inner sep=1mm]
foreach~in {3,...,7}
node[circumscribed polygon={draw=blue!~0!green,regular polygon sides=~}] {XX};
node[circle,draw=red] {XX};
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
The "inner circle" in shapes.geometric
has a radius that is half of the longest side of the content box plus the inner sep, and multiplied by 1.4142136
, which is approximately sqrt(2)
. So to obtain a circle shape that has this behavior you can define a new shape, let's say Circle
(with capital C) that is a slight modification of the existing ellipse
shape.
documentclass[tikz, border=7pt, convert={density=4200}]{standalone}
usetikzlibrary{shapes.geometric}
makeatletter
pgfdeclareshape{Circle}
%
% Draws a circle around the text
% (based on the original ellipse shape)
%
{%
savedanchorcenterpoint{%
pgf@x=.5wdpgfnodeparttextbox%
pgf@y=.5htpgfnodeparttextbox%
advancepgf@y by-.5dppgfnodeparttextbox%
}%
savedanchorradius{%
%
% Calculate ``height radius''
%
pgf@y=.5htpgfnodeparttextbox%
advancepgf@y by.5dppgfnodeparttextbox%
pgfmathsetlengthpgf@yb{pgfkeysvalueof{/pgf/inner ysep}}%
advancepgf@y bypgf@yb%
%
% Calculate ``width radius''
%
pgf@x=.5wdpgfnodeparttextbox%
pgfmathsetlengthpgf@xb{pgfkeysvalueof{/pgf/inner xsep}}%
advancepgf@x bypgf@xb%
%
% Adjust
%
% ==============================
% added to ellipse shape to become circle
ifdimpgf@y>pgf@x%
pgf@xpgf@y%
else%
pgf@ypgf@x%
fi%
% ==============================
pgf@x=1.4142136pgf@x%
pgf@y=1.4142136pgf@y%
%
% Adjust height, if necessary
%
pgfmathsetlengthpgf@yc{pgfkeysvalueof{/pgf/minimum height}}%
ifdimpgf@y<.5pgf@yc%
pgf@y=.5pgf@yc%
fi%
%
% Adjust width, if necessary
%
pgfmathsetlengthpgf@xc{pgfkeysvalueof{/pgf/minimum width}}%
ifdimpgf@x<.5pgf@xc%
pgf@x=.5pgf@xc%
fi%
%
% Add outer sep
%
pgfmathsetlength{pgf@xb}{pgfkeysvalueof{/pgf/outer xsep}}%
pgfmathsetlength{pgf@yb}{pgfkeysvalueof{/pgf/outer ysep}}%
advancepgf@x bypgf@xb%
advancepgf@y bypgf@yb%
}%
%
% Anchors
%
anchor{center}{centerpoint}%
anchor{mid}{centerpointpgfmathsetlengthpgf@y{.5ex}}%
anchor{base}{centerpointpgf@y=0pt}%
anchor{north}
{
pgf@process{radius}
pgf@ya=pgf@y%
pgf@process{centerpoint}
advancepgf@y bypgf@ya
}%
anchor{south}
{
pgf@process{radius}
pgf@ya=pgf@y%
pgf@process{centerpoint}
advancepgf@y by-pgf@ya
}%
anchor{west}
{
pgf@process{radius}
pgf@xa=pgf@x%
pgf@process{centerpoint}
advancepgf@x by-pgf@xa
}%
anchor{mid west}
{%
pgf@process{radius}
pgf@xa=pgf@x%
pgf@process{centerpoint}
advancepgf@x by-pgf@xa%
pgfmathsetlengthpgf@y{.5ex}
}%
anchor{base west}
{%
pgf@process{radius}
pgf@xa=pgf@x%
pgf@process{centerpoint}
advancepgf@x by-pgf@xa%
pgf@y=0pt
}%
anchor{north west}
{
pgf@process{radius}
pgf@xa=pgf@x%
pgf@ya=pgf@y%
pgf@process{centerpoint}
advancepgf@x by-0.707107pgf@xa
advancepgf@y by0.707107pgf@ya
}%
anchor{south west}
{
pgf@process{radius}
pgf@xa=pgf@x%
pgf@ya=pgf@y%
pgf@process{centerpoint}
advancepgf@x by-0.707107pgf@xa
advancepgf@y by-0.707107pgf@ya
}%
anchor{east}
{%
pgf@process{radius}
pgf@xa=pgf@x%
pgf@process{centerpoint}
advancepgf@x bypgf@xa
}%
anchor{mid east}
{%
pgf@process{radius}
pgf@xa=pgf@x%
pgf@process{centerpoint}
advancepgf@x bypgf@xa%
pgfmathsetlengthpgf@y{.5ex}
}%
anchor{base east}
{%
pgf@process{radius}
pgf@xa=pgf@x%
pgf@process{centerpoint}
advancepgf@x bypgf@xa%
pgf@y=0pt
}%
anchor{north east}
{
pgf@process{radius}
pgf@xa=pgf@x%
pgf@ya=pgf@y%
pgf@process{centerpoint}
advancepgf@x by0.707107pgf@xa
advancepgf@y by0.707107pgf@ya
}%
anchor{south east}
{
pgf@process{radius}
pgf@xa=pgf@x%
pgf@ya=pgf@y%
pgf@process{centerpoint}
advancepgf@x by0.707107pgf@xa
advancepgf@y by-0.707107pgf@ya
}%
anchorborder{
edefpgf@marshal{%
noexpandpgfpointborderellipse
{noexpandpgfqpoint{thepgf@x}{thepgf@y}}
{noexpandradius}%
}%
pgf@marshal%
pgf@xa=pgf@x%
pgf@ya=pgf@y%
centerpoint%
advancepgf@x bypgf@xa%
advancepgf@y bypgf@ya%
}%
%
% Background path
%
backgroundpath
{
pgf@process{radius}%
pgfutil@tempdima=pgf@x%
pgfutil@tempdimb=pgf@y%
pgfmathsetlength{pgf@xb}{pgfkeysvalueof{/pgf/outer xsep}}%
pgfmathsetlength{pgf@yb}{pgfkeysvalueof{/pgf/outer ysep}}%
advancepgfutil@tempdima by-pgf@xb%
advancepgfutil@tempdimb by-pgf@yb%
pgfpathellipse{centerpoint}{pgfqpoint{pgfutil@tempdima}{0pt}}{pgfqpoint{0pt}{pgfutil@tempdimb}}%
}%
}%
makeatother
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}[nodes={draw, inner sep=0}]
node[regular polygon,regular polygon sides=4] (a) {XX};
node[Circle, blue] (b) {XX};
node[circle] (c) {XX};
foreach a in {north,south,east,west,north east,south east,north west,south west}{
fill[red] (a.a) circle(0.5pt);
fill[yellow] (b.a) circle(0.25pt);
fill[orange] (c.a) circle(0.25pt);
}
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
Addendum:
If you want to go the other way and create a circumscribed polygon around the standard circle
node style, that do not use low level tricks, you can define circumscribed polygon
that use append after command
to add well sized regular polygon
. This is not a robust code for meany reasons, it is just a proof of concept :
documentclass[tikz,border=7pt,convert={density=4200}]{standalone}
usetikzlibrary{calc,shapes.geometric}
% don't tell me to not use tikzstyle ;)
tikzstyle{circumscribed polygon}[draw]=[
circle,draw=none,fill=none,shade=none,
append after command={
let p1=($(tikzlastnode.west)-(tikzlastnode.east)$),
n1 = {(veclen(p1)-pgflinewidth)/2.828427} % 2*sqrt(2) = 2.8284271247461903
in
(tikzlastnode.center) node[regular polygon, inner sep=n1, #1]{}
}
]
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}[inner sep=1mm]
foreach~in {3,...,7}
node[circumscribed polygon={draw=blue!~0!green,regular polygon sides=~}] {XX};
node[circle,draw=red] {XX};
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
edited 20 hours ago
answered yesterday
KpymKpym
16.7k24089
16.7k24089
Very enlightening. I wonder if, then, rather than defining a completely new shape, it is not easier to find out a systematic way to give a proper, automatically determinedinner separation
to a normalcircle
. Analogously one could give an automatically determined negativeinner sep
to aregular polygon
. I will think about it, but you helped already a lot!
– Axel Krypton
yesterday
And I would also say that thepgf
inherit...[from=ellipse]
commands might be useful to shorten the code, but I have to still explore this world and I might be completely wrong.
– Axel Krypton
yesterday
Thanks for the added information, very useful, indeed. I came up with a slightly differentCircle
and I shared this in a separate answer. :)
– Axel Krypton
20 hours ago
add a comment |
Very enlightening. I wonder if, then, rather than defining a completely new shape, it is not easier to find out a systematic way to give a proper, automatically determinedinner separation
to a normalcircle
. Analogously one could give an automatically determined negativeinner sep
to aregular polygon
. I will think about it, but you helped already a lot!
– Axel Krypton
yesterday
And I would also say that thepgf
inherit...[from=ellipse]
commands might be useful to shorten the code, but I have to still explore this world and I might be completely wrong.
– Axel Krypton
yesterday
Thanks for the added information, very useful, indeed. I came up with a slightly differentCircle
and I shared this in a separate answer. :)
– Axel Krypton
20 hours ago
Very enlightening. I wonder if, then, rather than defining a completely new shape, it is not easier to find out a systematic way to give a proper, automatically determined
inner separation
to a normal circle
. Analogously one could give an automatically determined negative inner sep
to a regular polygon
. I will think about it, but you helped already a lot!– Axel Krypton
yesterday
Very enlightening. I wonder if, then, rather than defining a completely new shape, it is not easier to find out a systematic way to give a proper, automatically determined
inner separation
to a normal circle
. Analogously one could give an automatically determined negative inner sep
to a regular polygon
. I will think about it, but you helped already a lot!– Axel Krypton
yesterday
And I would also say that the
pgf
inherit...[from=ellipse]
commands might be useful to shorten the code, but I have to still explore this world and I might be completely wrong.– Axel Krypton
yesterday
And I would also say that the
pgf
inherit...[from=ellipse]
commands might be useful to shorten the code, but I have to still explore this world and I might be completely wrong.– Axel Krypton
yesterday
Thanks for the added information, very useful, indeed. I came up with a slightly different
Circle
and I shared this in a separate answer. :)– Axel Krypton
20 hours ago
Thanks for the added information, very useful, indeed. I came up with a slightly different
Circle
and I shared this in a separate answer. :)– Axel Krypton
20 hours ago
add a comment |
Using through
library of Tikz.
documentclass[tikz, border=1mm]{standalone}
usetikzlibrary{shapes.geometric,through}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}[every node/.style={draw, inner sep=0}]
node[regular polygon,regular polygon sides=4] (a) {XX};
node (b) [draw,blue, circle through=(a.north)] at (a.center) {XX};
node[circle] (c) {XX};
foreach a in {north,south,east,west,north east,south east,north west,south west}{
fill[red] (a.a) circle(0.5pt);
fill[yellow] (b.a) circle(0.25pt);
fill[orange] (c.a) circle(0.25pt);
}
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
Although strictly speaking you proposed a valid way to draw the blue circle, I was more interested in a general way to draw that shape for a node, without having to rely to another node/point (see edit question). The only way I see I could use your idea is to always have two nodes, one invisible and one that would be the node I wish. However, this is not what I am looking for.
– Axel Krypton
yesterday
add a comment |
Using through
library of Tikz.
documentclass[tikz, border=1mm]{standalone}
usetikzlibrary{shapes.geometric,through}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}[every node/.style={draw, inner sep=0}]
node[regular polygon,regular polygon sides=4] (a) {XX};
node (b) [draw,blue, circle through=(a.north)] at (a.center) {XX};
node[circle] (c) {XX};
foreach a in {north,south,east,west,north east,south east,north west,south west}{
fill[red] (a.a) circle(0.5pt);
fill[yellow] (b.a) circle(0.25pt);
fill[orange] (c.a) circle(0.25pt);
}
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
Although strictly speaking you proposed a valid way to draw the blue circle, I was more interested in a general way to draw that shape for a node, without having to rely to another node/point (see edit question). The only way I see I could use your idea is to always have two nodes, one invisible and one that would be the node I wish. However, this is not what I am looking for.
– Axel Krypton
yesterday
add a comment |
Using through
library of Tikz.
documentclass[tikz, border=1mm]{standalone}
usetikzlibrary{shapes.geometric,through}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}[every node/.style={draw, inner sep=0}]
node[regular polygon,regular polygon sides=4] (a) {XX};
node (b) [draw,blue, circle through=(a.north)] at (a.center) {XX};
node[circle] (c) {XX};
foreach a in {north,south,east,west,north east,south east,north west,south west}{
fill[red] (a.a) circle(0.5pt);
fill[yellow] (b.a) circle(0.25pt);
fill[orange] (c.a) circle(0.25pt);
}
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
Using through
library of Tikz.
documentclass[tikz, border=1mm]{standalone}
usetikzlibrary{shapes.geometric,through}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}[every node/.style={draw, inner sep=0}]
node[regular polygon,regular polygon sides=4] (a) {XX};
node (b) [draw,blue, circle through=(a.north)] at (a.center) {XX};
node[circle] (c) {XX};
foreach a in {north,south,east,west,north east,south east,north west,south west}{
fill[red] (a.a) circle(0.5pt);
fill[yellow] (b.a) circle(0.25pt);
fill[orange] (c.a) circle(0.25pt);
}
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
answered yesterday
ferahfezaferahfeza
7,05411933
7,05411933
Although strictly speaking you proposed a valid way to draw the blue circle, I was more interested in a general way to draw that shape for a node, without having to rely to another node/point (see edit question). The only way I see I could use your idea is to always have two nodes, one invisible and one that would be the node I wish. However, this is not what I am looking for.
– Axel Krypton
yesterday
add a comment |
Although strictly speaking you proposed a valid way to draw the blue circle, I was more interested in a general way to draw that shape for a node, without having to rely to another node/point (see edit question). The only way I see I could use your idea is to always have two nodes, one invisible and one that would be the node I wish. However, this is not what I am looking for.
– Axel Krypton
yesterday
Although strictly speaking you proposed a valid way to draw the blue circle, I was more interested in a general way to draw that shape for a node, without having to rely to another node/point (see edit question). The only way I see I could use your idea is to always have two nodes, one invisible and one that would be the node I wish. However, this is not what I am looking for.
– Axel Krypton
yesterday
Although strictly speaking you proposed a valid way to draw the blue circle, I was more interested in a general way to draw that shape for a node, without having to rely to another node/point (see edit question). The only way I see I could use your idea is to always have two nodes, one invisible and one that would be the node I wish. However, this is not what I am looking for.
– Axel Krypton
yesterday
add a comment |
Just to share a different way to achieve what Kpym did in his very nice answer declaring a new shape, I thought one could have simply a Circle
style which sets properly the minimum size of a circle shape (in this particular case it is always true that the content will never exceed the minimum size
since we are trying to enlarge the circle). It should work for any node content, no matter if its width is larger than its height or vice-versa. A couple of remarks:
- In this approach the node name and the node position must be declared before the options or inside them using the
name
andat
keys, respectively. - A
Circle
inner sep
has to be specified before theCircle
style, but it might easily be improved, if needed otherwise.
Here the code:
documentclass[tikz, border=1mm]{standalone}
usetikzlibrary{shapes.geometric}
tikzset{%
Square/.style={regular polygon, regular polygon sides=4},
Circle/.style={%
circle,
/utils/exec={%
pgfmathsetmacropolygonIncircleDiameter{
sqrt(2)*max(width("#1")+2*pgfshapeinnerxsep, height("#1") + depth("#1") + 2 * pgfshapeinnerysep)
}
},
minimum size=polygonIncircleDiameter,
node contents={#1}
}
}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
node[inner sep=0, Square, draw=cyan] at (0,0) {xx};
node[inner sep=0, Circle={xx}, draw=blue];
node[Square, draw=cyan] at (1,0) {i};
node[Circle={i}, draw=blue, at={(1,0)}];
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
Very nice ! Two remarks : it would be nice to not pass the node content as parameter toCircle
but I think that this will be tricky, and probablypolygonIncircleDiameter
is better than to divide and then multiply by 2 thepolygonIncircleRadius
.
– Kpym
19 hours ago
I implemented your suggestion, it definitely makes sense! :) About not passing the node content to the style, well, honestly I would not know how to then achieve the same result. Yes, it definitely looks tricky to me.
– Axel Krypton
19 hours ago
add a comment |
Just to share a different way to achieve what Kpym did in his very nice answer declaring a new shape, I thought one could have simply a Circle
style which sets properly the minimum size of a circle shape (in this particular case it is always true that the content will never exceed the minimum size
since we are trying to enlarge the circle). It should work for any node content, no matter if its width is larger than its height or vice-versa. A couple of remarks:
- In this approach the node name and the node position must be declared before the options or inside them using the
name
andat
keys, respectively. - A
Circle
inner sep
has to be specified before theCircle
style, but it might easily be improved, if needed otherwise.
Here the code:
documentclass[tikz, border=1mm]{standalone}
usetikzlibrary{shapes.geometric}
tikzset{%
Square/.style={regular polygon, regular polygon sides=4},
Circle/.style={%
circle,
/utils/exec={%
pgfmathsetmacropolygonIncircleDiameter{
sqrt(2)*max(width("#1")+2*pgfshapeinnerxsep, height("#1") + depth("#1") + 2 * pgfshapeinnerysep)
}
},
minimum size=polygonIncircleDiameter,
node contents={#1}
}
}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
node[inner sep=0, Square, draw=cyan] at (0,0) {xx};
node[inner sep=0, Circle={xx}, draw=blue];
node[Square, draw=cyan] at (1,0) {i};
node[Circle={i}, draw=blue, at={(1,0)}];
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
Very nice ! Two remarks : it would be nice to not pass the node content as parameter toCircle
but I think that this will be tricky, and probablypolygonIncircleDiameter
is better than to divide and then multiply by 2 thepolygonIncircleRadius
.
– Kpym
19 hours ago
I implemented your suggestion, it definitely makes sense! :) About not passing the node content to the style, well, honestly I would not know how to then achieve the same result. Yes, it definitely looks tricky to me.
– Axel Krypton
19 hours ago
add a comment |
Just to share a different way to achieve what Kpym did in his very nice answer declaring a new shape, I thought one could have simply a Circle
style which sets properly the minimum size of a circle shape (in this particular case it is always true that the content will never exceed the minimum size
since we are trying to enlarge the circle). It should work for any node content, no matter if its width is larger than its height or vice-versa. A couple of remarks:
- In this approach the node name and the node position must be declared before the options or inside them using the
name
andat
keys, respectively. - A
Circle
inner sep
has to be specified before theCircle
style, but it might easily be improved, if needed otherwise.
Here the code:
documentclass[tikz, border=1mm]{standalone}
usetikzlibrary{shapes.geometric}
tikzset{%
Square/.style={regular polygon, regular polygon sides=4},
Circle/.style={%
circle,
/utils/exec={%
pgfmathsetmacropolygonIncircleDiameter{
sqrt(2)*max(width("#1")+2*pgfshapeinnerxsep, height("#1") + depth("#1") + 2 * pgfshapeinnerysep)
}
},
minimum size=polygonIncircleDiameter,
node contents={#1}
}
}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
node[inner sep=0, Square, draw=cyan] at (0,0) {xx};
node[inner sep=0, Circle={xx}, draw=blue];
node[Square, draw=cyan] at (1,0) {i};
node[Circle={i}, draw=blue, at={(1,0)}];
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
Just to share a different way to achieve what Kpym did in his very nice answer declaring a new shape, I thought one could have simply a Circle
style which sets properly the minimum size of a circle shape (in this particular case it is always true that the content will never exceed the minimum size
since we are trying to enlarge the circle). It should work for any node content, no matter if its width is larger than its height or vice-versa. A couple of remarks:
- In this approach the node name and the node position must be declared before the options or inside them using the
name
andat
keys, respectively. - A
Circle
inner sep
has to be specified before theCircle
style, but it might easily be improved, if needed otherwise.
Here the code:
documentclass[tikz, border=1mm]{standalone}
usetikzlibrary{shapes.geometric}
tikzset{%
Square/.style={regular polygon, regular polygon sides=4},
Circle/.style={%
circle,
/utils/exec={%
pgfmathsetmacropolygonIncircleDiameter{
sqrt(2)*max(width("#1")+2*pgfshapeinnerxsep, height("#1") + depth("#1") + 2 * pgfshapeinnerysep)
}
},
minimum size=polygonIncircleDiameter,
node contents={#1}
}
}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
node[inner sep=0, Square, draw=cyan] at (0,0) {xx};
node[inner sep=0, Circle={xx}, draw=blue];
node[Square, draw=cyan] at (1,0) {i};
node[Circle={i}, draw=blue, at={(1,0)}];
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
edited 19 hours ago
answered 20 hours ago
Axel KryptonAxel Krypton
460111
460111
Very nice ! Two remarks : it would be nice to not pass the node content as parameter toCircle
but I think that this will be tricky, and probablypolygonIncircleDiameter
is better than to divide and then multiply by 2 thepolygonIncircleRadius
.
– Kpym
19 hours ago
I implemented your suggestion, it definitely makes sense! :) About not passing the node content to the style, well, honestly I would not know how to then achieve the same result. Yes, it definitely looks tricky to me.
– Axel Krypton
19 hours ago
add a comment |
Very nice ! Two remarks : it would be nice to not pass the node content as parameter toCircle
but I think that this will be tricky, and probablypolygonIncircleDiameter
is better than to divide and then multiply by 2 thepolygonIncircleRadius
.
– Kpym
19 hours ago
I implemented your suggestion, it definitely makes sense! :) About not passing the node content to the style, well, honestly I would not know how to then achieve the same result. Yes, it definitely looks tricky to me.
– Axel Krypton
19 hours ago
Very nice ! Two remarks : it would be nice to not pass the node content as parameter to
Circle
but I think that this will be tricky, and probably polygonIncircleDiameter
is better than to divide and then multiply by 2 the polygonIncircleRadius
.– Kpym
19 hours ago
Very nice ! Two remarks : it would be nice to not pass the node content as parameter to
Circle
but I think that this will be tricky, and probably polygonIncircleDiameter
is better than to divide and then multiply by 2 the polygonIncircleRadius
.– Kpym
19 hours ago
I implemented your suggestion, it definitely makes sense! :) About not passing the node content to the style, well, honestly I would not know how to then achieve the same result. Yes, it definitely looks tricky to me.
– Axel Krypton
19 hours ago
I implemented your suggestion, it definitely makes sense! :) About not passing the node content to the style, well, honestly I would not know how to then achieve the same result. Yes, it definitely looks tricky to me.
– Axel Krypton
19 hours ago
add a comment |
This wraps a polyogon around the circle.
documentclass[tikz,border=3.14mm]{standalone}
usetikzlibrary{calc}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}[every node/.style={draw, inner sep=0},
polygon with circle/.style args={#1 inscribed and #2 corners}{insert path={%
let p1=($(#1.0)-(#1.center)$),n1={abs(x1)/cos(180/#2)}
in ($(#1.center)+(0:n1)$)
foreach X in {1,...,numexpr#2-1}
{ -- ($(#1.center)+({360*X/#2}:n1)$) }-- cycle}}]
node[circle] (c) {XX};
draw[blue,polygon with circle=c inscribed and 12 corners] ;
foreach a in {north,south,east,west,north east,south east,north west,south west}{
fill[orange] (c.a) circle(0.25pt);
}
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
add a comment |
This wraps a polyogon around the circle.
documentclass[tikz,border=3.14mm]{standalone}
usetikzlibrary{calc}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}[every node/.style={draw, inner sep=0},
polygon with circle/.style args={#1 inscribed and #2 corners}{insert path={%
let p1=($(#1.0)-(#1.center)$),n1={abs(x1)/cos(180/#2)}
in ($(#1.center)+(0:n1)$)
foreach X in {1,...,numexpr#2-1}
{ -- ($(#1.center)+({360*X/#2}:n1)$) }-- cycle}}]
node[circle] (c) {XX};
draw[blue,polygon with circle=c inscribed and 12 corners] ;
foreach a in {north,south,east,west,north east,south east,north west,south west}{
fill[orange] (c.a) circle(0.25pt);
}
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
add a comment |
This wraps a polyogon around the circle.
documentclass[tikz,border=3.14mm]{standalone}
usetikzlibrary{calc}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}[every node/.style={draw, inner sep=0},
polygon with circle/.style args={#1 inscribed and #2 corners}{insert path={%
let p1=($(#1.0)-(#1.center)$),n1={abs(x1)/cos(180/#2)}
in ($(#1.center)+(0:n1)$)
foreach X in {1,...,numexpr#2-1}
{ -- ($(#1.center)+({360*X/#2}:n1)$) }-- cycle}}]
node[circle] (c) {XX};
draw[blue,polygon with circle=c inscribed and 12 corners] ;
foreach a in {north,south,east,west,north east,south east,north west,south west}{
fill[orange] (c.a) circle(0.25pt);
}
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
This wraps a polyogon around the circle.
documentclass[tikz,border=3.14mm]{standalone}
usetikzlibrary{calc}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}[every node/.style={draw, inner sep=0},
polygon with circle/.style args={#1 inscribed and #2 corners}{insert path={%
let p1=($(#1.0)-(#1.center)$),n1={abs(x1)/cos(180/#2)}
in ($(#1.center)+(0:n1)$)
foreach X in {1,...,numexpr#2-1}
{ -- ($(#1.center)+({360*X/#2}:n1)$) }-- cycle}}]
node[circle] (c) {XX};
draw[blue,polygon with circle=c inscribed and 12 corners] ;
foreach a in {north,south,east,west,north east,south east,north west,south west}{
fill[orange] (c.a) circle(0.25pt);
}
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
answered 21 hours ago
marmotmarmot
111k5138258
111k5138258
add a comment |
add a comment |
This solution uses calc
library to compute regular polygon's inner radius. This way it's possible to compute circunscribed circle's minimum width.
documentclass[tikz, border=1mm]{standalone}
usetikzlibrary{shapes.geometric, calc}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
node[inner sep=0, regular polygon, regular polygon sides=4, draw=cyan] (a) {xx};
path let p1=($(a.center)-(a.side 1)$) in node[circle, inner sep=0, minimum width={2*veclen(x1,y1)-pgflinewidth}, draw=blue] {};
node[inner sep=0, draw=cyan, regular polygon, regular polygon sides=7] (b) at (1,0) {i};
path let p1=($(b.center)-(b.side 1)$) in node[circle, inner sep=0, minimum width={2*veclen(x1,y1)-pgflinewidth}, draw=blue] at (b) {};
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
add a comment |
This solution uses calc
library to compute regular polygon's inner radius. This way it's possible to compute circunscribed circle's minimum width.
documentclass[tikz, border=1mm]{standalone}
usetikzlibrary{shapes.geometric, calc}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
node[inner sep=0, regular polygon, regular polygon sides=4, draw=cyan] (a) {xx};
path let p1=($(a.center)-(a.side 1)$) in node[circle, inner sep=0, minimum width={2*veclen(x1,y1)-pgflinewidth}, draw=blue] {};
node[inner sep=0, draw=cyan, regular polygon, regular polygon sides=7] (b) at (1,0) {i};
path let p1=($(b.center)-(b.side 1)$) in node[circle, inner sep=0, minimum width={2*veclen(x1,y1)-pgflinewidth}, draw=blue] at (b) {};
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
add a comment |
This solution uses calc
library to compute regular polygon's inner radius. This way it's possible to compute circunscribed circle's minimum width.
documentclass[tikz, border=1mm]{standalone}
usetikzlibrary{shapes.geometric, calc}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
node[inner sep=0, regular polygon, regular polygon sides=4, draw=cyan] (a) {xx};
path let p1=($(a.center)-(a.side 1)$) in node[circle, inner sep=0, minimum width={2*veclen(x1,y1)-pgflinewidth}, draw=blue] {};
node[inner sep=0, draw=cyan, regular polygon, regular polygon sides=7] (b) at (1,0) {i};
path let p1=($(b.center)-(b.side 1)$) in node[circle, inner sep=0, minimum width={2*veclen(x1,y1)-pgflinewidth}, draw=blue] at (b) {};
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
This solution uses calc
library to compute regular polygon's inner radius. This way it's possible to compute circunscribed circle's minimum width.
documentclass[tikz, border=1mm]{standalone}
usetikzlibrary{shapes.geometric, calc}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
node[inner sep=0, regular polygon, regular polygon sides=4, draw=cyan] (a) {xx};
path let p1=($(a.center)-(a.side 1)$) in node[circle, inner sep=0, minimum width={2*veclen(x1,y1)-pgflinewidth}, draw=blue] {};
node[inner sep=0, draw=cyan, regular polygon, regular polygon sides=7] (b) at (1,0) {i};
path let p1=($(b.center)-(b.side 1)$) in node[circle, inner sep=0, minimum width={2*veclen(x1,y1)-pgflinewidth}, draw=blue] at (b) {};
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
answered 16 hours ago
IgnasiIgnasi
95.1k4175318
95.1k4175318
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f480661%2fregular-polygon-vs-circle-shapes-in-tikz%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
You can see in the manual that for empty nodes the ratio is
sqrt(2)
(but I don't know why). In the manual a regular polygon with inner space equal to0.3535cm
(which issqrt(2)/4
) is tangent to circle with radius1/2 cm
.– Kpym
yesterday
I had noticed that strange
inner sep
in the example. But I had also noticed that it was about an empty node. If I have an arbitrary node content, I would then need to adjust that0.3535cm
magic number (and I should think about how). Are you suggesting something like that?– Axel Krypton
yesterday
1
This
sqrt(2)
factor does make sense if you assume the the content is approximately quadratic. And I do not understand the question. That is, I thought I did before I saw the answers. Could you perhaps indicate to which extent the answers address the question. I am really confused.– marmot
yesterday
1
@marmot As I understand the answer is "How to draw a circular shape that has the same inner circle as all other regular polygons".
– Kpym
yesterday
1
@marmot I think that I have answered this par of the question : the the origin of the white space around the node content is that in the definition of the
regular polygon
shape the inner radius is calculated differently from thecircle
shape (and the ratio between both depends on the shape, i.e. the aspect ratio).– Kpym
yesterday