Phrase that means “mastery of a system without understanding the underlying principles”?





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}







1















Is there a word or phrase to describe a situation where a person masters a system, but does not understand the underlying principles?



Here are a few examples of such situations:




  • Person A is expert at finding mathematical functions of almost any
    shape, but person A only has elementary mathematical knowledge.
    He/she is only expert at this particular task because of a massive amount of experiments.


  • Person B is a very good player in a business simulation game (which

    happens to be based on realistic economic models). He/she is an

    excellent player despite being completely ignorant of economic models.


  • Person C knows how to replace electrical plugs, but has very poor knowledge of electricity. He/she only knows about the proper placement of wires. If you ask him/her what "live", "neutral", and "ground" actually do, you will be met with a blank stare.


  • Person D programs computers by "poking". He/she has no idea what the programming constructs actually do, and has learned to program computers only through a large amount of failures (program results in error, program will not compile, etc.) and a large amount of examples (the memorization of idioms, and the copying of code). This person is capable of producing useful programs, but is still clueless about what the programming constructs really mean.











share|improve this question

























  • I've seen this referred to as the difference between procedural and declarative knowledge.

    – jlovegren
    Apr 5 at 21:03











  • ...perhaps "instinctual"?

    – Cascabel
    Apr 5 at 21:14











  • superficial mastery? empirical knowledge?

    – Philip Wood
    Apr 5 at 21:31











  • @PhilipWood I think "superficial mastery" doesn't give enough credit to the people possessing such mastery. One can make a living and be a productive member of society even when one does not understand the underlying principles.

    – Flux
    Apr 5 at 21:38











  • Well, mastery is mastery, but I see your point.

    – Philip Wood
    Apr 5 at 21:41


















1















Is there a word or phrase to describe a situation where a person masters a system, but does not understand the underlying principles?



Here are a few examples of such situations:




  • Person A is expert at finding mathematical functions of almost any
    shape, but person A only has elementary mathematical knowledge.
    He/she is only expert at this particular task because of a massive amount of experiments.


  • Person B is a very good player in a business simulation game (which

    happens to be based on realistic economic models). He/she is an

    excellent player despite being completely ignorant of economic models.


  • Person C knows how to replace electrical plugs, but has very poor knowledge of electricity. He/she only knows about the proper placement of wires. If you ask him/her what "live", "neutral", and "ground" actually do, you will be met with a blank stare.


  • Person D programs computers by "poking". He/she has no idea what the programming constructs actually do, and has learned to program computers only through a large amount of failures (program results in error, program will not compile, etc.) and a large amount of examples (the memorization of idioms, and the copying of code). This person is capable of producing useful programs, but is still clueless about what the programming constructs really mean.











share|improve this question

























  • I've seen this referred to as the difference between procedural and declarative knowledge.

    – jlovegren
    Apr 5 at 21:03











  • ...perhaps "instinctual"?

    – Cascabel
    Apr 5 at 21:14











  • superficial mastery? empirical knowledge?

    – Philip Wood
    Apr 5 at 21:31











  • @PhilipWood I think "superficial mastery" doesn't give enough credit to the people possessing such mastery. One can make a living and be a productive member of society even when one does not understand the underlying principles.

    – Flux
    Apr 5 at 21:38











  • Well, mastery is mastery, but I see your point.

    – Philip Wood
    Apr 5 at 21:41














1












1








1








Is there a word or phrase to describe a situation where a person masters a system, but does not understand the underlying principles?



Here are a few examples of such situations:




  • Person A is expert at finding mathematical functions of almost any
    shape, but person A only has elementary mathematical knowledge.
    He/she is only expert at this particular task because of a massive amount of experiments.


  • Person B is a very good player in a business simulation game (which

    happens to be based on realistic economic models). He/she is an

    excellent player despite being completely ignorant of economic models.


  • Person C knows how to replace electrical plugs, but has very poor knowledge of electricity. He/she only knows about the proper placement of wires. If you ask him/her what "live", "neutral", and "ground" actually do, you will be met with a blank stare.


  • Person D programs computers by "poking". He/she has no idea what the programming constructs actually do, and has learned to program computers only through a large amount of failures (program results in error, program will not compile, etc.) and a large amount of examples (the memorization of idioms, and the copying of code). This person is capable of producing useful programs, but is still clueless about what the programming constructs really mean.











share|improve this question
















Is there a word or phrase to describe a situation where a person masters a system, but does not understand the underlying principles?



Here are a few examples of such situations:




  • Person A is expert at finding mathematical functions of almost any
    shape, but person A only has elementary mathematical knowledge.
    He/she is only expert at this particular task because of a massive amount of experiments.


  • Person B is a very good player in a business simulation game (which

    happens to be based on realistic economic models). He/she is an

    excellent player despite being completely ignorant of economic models.


  • Person C knows how to replace electrical plugs, but has very poor knowledge of electricity. He/she only knows about the proper placement of wires. If you ask him/her what "live", "neutral", and "ground" actually do, you will be met with a blank stare.


  • Person D programs computers by "poking". He/she has no idea what the programming constructs actually do, and has learned to program computers only through a large amount of failures (program results in error, program will not compile, etc.) and a large amount of examples (the memorization of idioms, and the copying of code). This person is capable of producing useful programs, but is still clueless about what the programming constructs really mean.








phrase-requests






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Apr 5 at 21:39







Flux

















asked Apr 5 at 20:52









FluxFlux

1264




1264













  • I've seen this referred to as the difference between procedural and declarative knowledge.

    – jlovegren
    Apr 5 at 21:03











  • ...perhaps "instinctual"?

    – Cascabel
    Apr 5 at 21:14











  • superficial mastery? empirical knowledge?

    – Philip Wood
    Apr 5 at 21:31











  • @PhilipWood I think "superficial mastery" doesn't give enough credit to the people possessing such mastery. One can make a living and be a productive member of society even when one does not understand the underlying principles.

    – Flux
    Apr 5 at 21:38











  • Well, mastery is mastery, but I see your point.

    – Philip Wood
    Apr 5 at 21:41



















  • I've seen this referred to as the difference between procedural and declarative knowledge.

    – jlovegren
    Apr 5 at 21:03











  • ...perhaps "instinctual"?

    – Cascabel
    Apr 5 at 21:14











  • superficial mastery? empirical knowledge?

    – Philip Wood
    Apr 5 at 21:31











  • @PhilipWood I think "superficial mastery" doesn't give enough credit to the people possessing such mastery. One can make a living and be a productive member of society even when one does not understand the underlying principles.

    – Flux
    Apr 5 at 21:38











  • Well, mastery is mastery, but I see your point.

    – Philip Wood
    Apr 5 at 21:41

















I've seen this referred to as the difference between procedural and declarative knowledge.

– jlovegren
Apr 5 at 21:03





I've seen this referred to as the difference between procedural and declarative knowledge.

– jlovegren
Apr 5 at 21:03













...perhaps "instinctual"?

– Cascabel
Apr 5 at 21:14





...perhaps "instinctual"?

– Cascabel
Apr 5 at 21:14













superficial mastery? empirical knowledge?

– Philip Wood
Apr 5 at 21:31





superficial mastery? empirical knowledge?

– Philip Wood
Apr 5 at 21:31













@PhilipWood I think "superficial mastery" doesn't give enough credit to the people possessing such mastery. One can make a living and be a productive member of society even when one does not understand the underlying principles.

– Flux
Apr 5 at 21:38





@PhilipWood I think "superficial mastery" doesn't give enough credit to the people possessing such mastery. One can make a living and be a productive member of society even when one does not understand the underlying principles.

– Flux
Apr 5 at 21:38













Well, mastery is mastery, but I see your point.

– Philip Wood
Apr 5 at 21:41





Well, mastery is mastery, but I see your point.

– Philip Wood
Apr 5 at 21:41










0






active

oldest

votes












Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f492790%2fphrase-that-means-mastery-of-a-system-without-understanding-the-underlying-prin%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f492790%2fphrase-that-means-mastery-of-a-system-without-understanding-the-underlying-prin%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

數位音樂下載

When can things happen in Etherscan, such as the picture below?

格利澤436b