Is there a word meaning “to assess from afar” or something similar?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Ideally, something that means to appraise or assess value from a distance.
I don't think there is going to be such a word.
But something similar, like to assess a situation, or to assess risk could be close analogues for what I want. Thanks.
single-word-requests
New contributor
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Ideally, something that means to appraise or assess value from a distance.
I don't think there is going to be such a word.
But something similar, like to assess a situation, or to assess risk could be close analogues for what I want. Thanks.
single-word-requests
New contributor
Consider changing the phrase close to it in your title to the word similar so that the afar/close relationship doesn't make the word it mean the thing assessed.
– Lawrence
2 days ago
@Lawrence my warped humour which gets me into trouble liked it as it's punny. It should catch an eye or three.
– KJO
2 days ago
It might clarify things a bit if you were to explain what you mean by 'distance.' Is that geographic, psychological or visual (and so on) distance?
– DJohnson
yesterday
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Ideally, something that means to appraise or assess value from a distance.
I don't think there is going to be such a word.
But something similar, like to assess a situation, or to assess risk could be close analogues for what I want. Thanks.
single-word-requests
New contributor
Ideally, something that means to appraise or assess value from a distance.
I don't think there is going to be such a word.
But something similar, like to assess a situation, or to assess risk could be close analogues for what I want. Thanks.
single-word-requests
single-word-requests
New contributor
New contributor
edited yesterday
New contributor
asked 2 days ago
Joel Wigton
1012
1012
New contributor
New contributor
Consider changing the phrase close to it in your title to the word similar so that the afar/close relationship doesn't make the word it mean the thing assessed.
– Lawrence
2 days ago
@Lawrence my warped humour which gets me into trouble liked it as it's punny. It should catch an eye or three.
– KJO
2 days ago
It might clarify things a bit if you were to explain what you mean by 'distance.' Is that geographic, psychological or visual (and so on) distance?
– DJohnson
yesterday
add a comment |
Consider changing the phrase close to it in your title to the word similar so that the afar/close relationship doesn't make the word it mean the thing assessed.
– Lawrence
2 days ago
@Lawrence my warped humour which gets me into trouble liked it as it's punny. It should catch an eye or three.
– KJO
2 days ago
It might clarify things a bit if you were to explain what you mean by 'distance.' Is that geographic, psychological or visual (and so on) distance?
– DJohnson
yesterday
Consider changing the phrase close to it in your title to the word similar so that the afar/close relationship doesn't make the word it mean the thing assessed.
– Lawrence
2 days ago
Consider changing the phrase close to it in your title to the word similar so that the afar/close relationship doesn't make the word it mean the thing assessed.
– Lawrence
2 days ago
@Lawrence my warped humour which gets me into trouble liked it as it's punny. It should catch an eye or three.
– KJO
2 days ago
@Lawrence my warped humour which gets me into trouble liked it as it's punny. It should catch an eye or three.
– KJO
2 days ago
It might clarify things a bit if you were to explain what you mean by 'distance.' Is that geographic, psychological or visual (and so on) distance?
– DJohnson
yesterday
It might clarify things a bit if you were to explain what you mean by 'distance.' Is that geographic, psychological or visual (and so on) distance?
– DJohnson
yesterday
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
Remote assessment
About 73,900 results of which "afar" (About 448 results) mainly in the remote fields of medicine.
However for realty we also see
Remote Valuation
About 3,850 results but 0 results with "afar" (guess it's implied)
good, but that is two words.
– lbf
2 days ago
@lbf Agreed but I did not want to be pilloried for suggesting a new single one as those are all trademarked (or should be) My best suggestion would be distogrammetry as google give me zero hits :-)
– KJO
2 days ago
Assuming those numbers are from Google search you should remove them and use a tool intended for that purpose (e.g. an Ngram tool). Google search gives an estimate that is always several orders of magnitude off. See here.
– Laurel
2 days ago
@Laurel I agreed google should be discouraged and those values are not a true filtered indicator, however due to security google wont let me build ngrams So as a very simple relative head count their total is all I can access. I was cautious to use the filtered thousands result not the millions of unfiltered hits
– KJO
yesterday
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
"Fly-on-the-wall observation is an observation technique where you can place yourself in a non-obtrusive position and observe from a distance. ..." - loft.io
New contributor
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
Remote assessment
About 73,900 results of which "afar" (About 448 results) mainly in the remote fields of medicine.
However for realty we also see
Remote Valuation
About 3,850 results but 0 results with "afar" (guess it's implied)
good, but that is two words.
– lbf
2 days ago
@lbf Agreed but I did not want to be pilloried for suggesting a new single one as those are all trademarked (or should be) My best suggestion would be distogrammetry as google give me zero hits :-)
– KJO
2 days ago
Assuming those numbers are from Google search you should remove them and use a tool intended for that purpose (e.g. an Ngram tool). Google search gives an estimate that is always several orders of magnitude off. See here.
– Laurel
2 days ago
@Laurel I agreed google should be discouraged and those values are not a true filtered indicator, however due to security google wont let me build ngrams So as a very simple relative head count their total is all I can access. I was cautious to use the filtered thousands result not the millions of unfiltered hits
– KJO
yesterday
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Remote assessment
About 73,900 results of which "afar" (About 448 results) mainly in the remote fields of medicine.
However for realty we also see
Remote Valuation
About 3,850 results but 0 results with "afar" (guess it's implied)
good, but that is two words.
– lbf
2 days ago
@lbf Agreed but I did not want to be pilloried for suggesting a new single one as those are all trademarked (or should be) My best suggestion would be distogrammetry as google give me zero hits :-)
– KJO
2 days ago
Assuming those numbers are from Google search you should remove them and use a tool intended for that purpose (e.g. an Ngram tool). Google search gives an estimate that is always several orders of magnitude off. See here.
– Laurel
2 days ago
@Laurel I agreed google should be discouraged and those values are not a true filtered indicator, however due to security google wont let me build ngrams So as a very simple relative head count their total is all I can access. I was cautious to use the filtered thousands result not the millions of unfiltered hits
– KJO
yesterday
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
Remote assessment
About 73,900 results of which "afar" (About 448 results) mainly in the remote fields of medicine.
However for realty we also see
Remote Valuation
About 3,850 results but 0 results with "afar" (guess it's implied)
Remote assessment
About 73,900 results of which "afar" (About 448 results) mainly in the remote fields of medicine.
However for realty we also see
Remote Valuation
About 3,850 results but 0 results with "afar" (guess it's implied)
edited 2 days ago
answered 2 days ago
KJO
6809
6809
good, but that is two words.
– lbf
2 days ago
@lbf Agreed but I did not want to be pilloried for suggesting a new single one as those are all trademarked (or should be) My best suggestion would be distogrammetry as google give me zero hits :-)
– KJO
2 days ago
Assuming those numbers are from Google search you should remove them and use a tool intended for that purpose (e.g. an Ngram tool). Google search gives an estimate that is always several orders of magnitude off. See here.
– Laurel
2 days ago
@Laurel I agreed google should be discouraged and those values are not a true filtered indicator, however due to security google wont let me build ngrams So as a very simple relative head count their total is all I can access. I was cautious to use the filtered thousands result not the millions of unfiltered hits
– KJO
yesterday
add a comment |
good, but that is two words.
– lbf
2 days ago
@lbf Agreed but I did not want to be pilloried for suggesting a new single one as those are all trademarked (or should be) My best suggestion would be distogrammetry as google give me zero hits :-)
– KJO
2 days ago
Assuming those numbers are from Google search you should remove them and use a tool intended for that purpose (e.g. an Ngram tool). Google search gives an estimate that is always several orders of magnitude off. See here.
– Laurel
2 days ago
@Laurel I agreed google should be discouraged and those values are not a true filtered indicator, however due to security google wont let me build ngrams So as a very simple relative head count their total is all I can access. I was cautious to use the filtered thousands result not the millions of unfiltered hits
– KJO
yesterday
good, but that is two words.
– lbf
2 days ago
good, but that is two words.
– lbf
2 days ago
@lbf Agreed but I did not want to be pilloried for suggesting a new single one as those are all trademarked (or should be) My best suggestion would be distogrammetry as google give me zero hits :-)
– KJO
2 days ago
@lbf Agreed but I did not want to be pilloried for suggesting a new single one as those are all trademarked (or should be) My best suggestion would be distogrammetry as google give me zero hits :-)
– KJO
2 days ago
Assuming those numbers are from Google search you should remove them and use a tool intended for that purpose (e.g. an Ngram tool). Google search gives an estimate that is always several orders of magnitude off. See here.
– Laurel
2 days ago
Assuming those numbers are from Google search you should remove them and use a tool intended for that purpose (e.g. an Ngram tool). Google search gives an estimate that is always several orders of magnitude off. See here.
– Laurel
2 days ago
@Laurel I agreed google should be discouraged and those values are not a true filtered indicator, however due to security google wont let me build ngrams So as a very simple relative head count their total is all I can access. I was cautious to use the filtered thousands result not the millions of unfiltered hits
– KJO
yesterday
@Laurel I agreed google should be discouraged and those values are not a true filtered indicator, however due to security google wont let me build ngrams So as a very simple relative head count their total is all I can access. I was cautious to use the filtered thousands result not the millions of unfiltered hits
– KJO
yesterday
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
"Fly-on-the-wall observation is an observation technique where you can place yourself in a non-obtrusive position and observe from a distance. ..." - loft.io
New contributor
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
"Fly-on-the-wall observation is an observation technique where you can place yourself in a non-obtrusive position and observe from a distance. ..." - loft.io
New contributor
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
"Fly-on-the-wall observation is an observation technique where you can place yourself in a non-obtrusive position and observe from a distance. ..." - loft.io
New contributor
"Fly-on-the-wall observation is an observation technique where you can place yourself in a non-obtrusive position and observe from a distance. ..." - loft.io
New contributor
New contributor
answered 2 days ago
Airport Chariot Car and Limo
1206
1206
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
Joel Wigton is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Joel Wigton is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Joel Wigton is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Joel Wigton is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f473180%2fis-there-a-word-meaning-to-assess-from-afar-or-something-similar%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Consider changing the phrase close to it in your title to the word similar so that the afar/close relationship doesn't make the word it mean the thing assessed.
– Lawrence
2 days ago
@Lawrence my warped humour which gets me into trouble liked it as it's punny. It should catch an eye or three.
– KJO
2 days ago
It might clarify things a bit if you were to explain what you mean by 'distance.' Is that geographic, psychological or visual (and so on) distance?
– DJohnson
yesterday