Whether the Vlan10 and Vlan20 in the Center Router are two virtual router interfaces?











up vote
4
down vote

favorite












I have a ISP 4321 Router in my Cisco Packet Tracer. and I added a NIM-ES2-4 module in the Router, that provides four switching ports. and now, I configured two VLANs to the two switch port of them. and now it created the two VLANs, you can see below, there are Vlan10 and Vlan11:



Router#show ip interface brief 
Interface IP-Address OK? Method Status Protocol
GigabitEthernet0/0/0 unassigned YES unset administratively down down
GigabitEthernet0/0/1 unassigned YES unset administratively down down
GigabitEthernet0/1/0 unassigned YES unset up up
GigabitEthernet0/1/1 unassigned YES unset up up
GigabitEthernet0/1/2 unassigned YES unset up down
GigabitEthernet0/1/3 unassigned YES unset up down
Vlan1 unassigned YES unset administratively down down
Vlan10 10.10.10.1 YES manual up up
Vlan11 10.10.20.1 YES manual up up


I want to know whether the Vlan10 and Vlan11 are two virtual Router ports?





If the Vlan10 and VLan11 are two virtual Router ports. I have configured the IP address on them, you can check the upper data. and I assigned the Vlan10 to GigabitEthernet0/1/0, the Vlan11 to GigabitEthernet0/1/1, all are access mode.



enter image description here



but now I cannot from 10.10.10.2 to ping 10.10.20.1:



Router>ping 10.10.20.1

Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 10.10.20.1, timeout is 2 seconds:
.....
Success rate is 0 percent (0/5)


the Center Router(Router11)'s route is bellow:



Router#show ip route
Codes: L - local, C - connected, S - static, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP
D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area
N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2
E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2, E - EGP
i - IS-IS, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2, ia - IS-IS inter area
* - candidate default, U - per-user static route, o - ODR
P - periodic downloaded static route

Gateway of last resort is not set

10.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 4 subnets, 2 masks
C 10.10.10.0/24 is directly connected, Vlan10
L 10.10.10.1/32 is directly connected, Vlan10
C 10.10.20.0/24 is directly connected, Vlan11
L 10.10.20.1/32 is directly connected, Vlan11




So my questions are:




  1. Whether the Vlan10 and Vlan20 in the Center Router are two virtual router interfaces?

  2. Why the Router 10 can not ping the Router11?










share|improve this question




























    up vote
    4
    down vote

    favorite












    I have a ISP 4321 Router in my Cisco Packet Tracer. and I added a NIM-ES2-4 module in the Router, that provides four switching ports. and now, I configured two VLANs to the two switch port of them. and now it created the two VLANs, you can see below, there are Vlan10 and Vlan11:



    Router#show ip interface brief 
    Interface IP-Address OK? Method Status Protocol
    GigabitEthernet0/0/0 unassigned YES unset administratively down down
    GigabitEthernet0/0/1 unassigned YES unset administratively down down
    GigabitEthernet0/1/0 unassigned YES unset up up
    GigabitEthernet0/1/1 unassigned YES unset up up
    GigabitEthernet0/1/2 unassigned YES unset up down
    GigabitEthernet0/1/3 unassigned YES unset up down
    Vlan1 unassigned YES unset administratively down down
    Vlan10 10.10.10.1 YES manual up up
    Vlan11 10.10.20.1 YES manual up up


    I want to know whether the Vlan10 and Vlan11 are two virtual Router ports?





    If the Vlan10 and VLan11 are two virtual Router ports. I have configured the IP address on them, you can check the upper data. and I assigned the Vlan10 to GigabitEthernet0/1/0, the Vlan11 to GigabitEthernet0/1/1, all are access mode.



    enter image description here



    but now I cannot from 10.10.10.2 to ping 10.10.20.1:



    Router>ping 10.10.20.1

    Type escape sequence to abort.
    Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 10.10.20.1, timeout is 2 seconds:
    .....
    Success rate is 0 percent (0/5)


    the Center Router(Router11)'s route is bellow:



    Router#show ip route
    Codes: L - local, C - connected, S - static, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP
    D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area
    N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2
    E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2, E - EGP
    i - IS-IS, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2, ia - IS-IS inter area
    * - candidate default, U - per-user static route, o - ODR
    P - periodic downloaded static route

    Gateway of last resort is not set

    10.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 4 subnets, 2 masks
    C 10.10.10.0/24 is directly connected, Vlan10
    L 10.10.10.1/32 is directly connected, Vlan10
    C 10.10.20.0/24 is directly connected, Vlan11
    L 10.10.20.1/32 is directly connected, Vlan11




    So my questions are:




    1. Whether the Vlan10 and Vlan20 in the Center Router are two virtual router interfaces?

    2. Why the Router 10 can not ping the Router11?










    share|improve this question


























      up vote
      4
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      4
      down vote

      favorite











      I have a ISP 4321 Router in my Cisco Packet Tracer. and I added a NIM-ES2-4 module in the Router, that provides four switching ports. and now, I configured two VLANs to the two switch port of them. and now it created the two VLANs, you can see below, there are Vlan10 and Vlan11:



      Router#show ip interface brief 
      Interface IP-Address OK? Method Status Protocol
      GigabitEthernet0/0/0 unassigned YES unset administratively down down
      GigabitEthernet0/0/1 unassigned YES unset administratively down down
      GigabitEthernet0/1/0 unassigned YES unset up up
      GigabitEthernet0/1/1 unassigned YES unset up up
      GigabitEthernet0/1/2 unassigned YES unset up down
      GigabitEthernet0/1/3 unassigned YES unset up down
      Vlan1 unassigned YES unset administratively down down
      Vlan10 10.10.10.1 YES manual up up
      Vlan11 10.10.20.1 YES manual up up


      I want to know whether the Vlan10 and Vlan11 are two virtual Router ports?





      If the Vlan10 and VLan11 are two virtual Router ports. I have configured the IP address on them, you can check the upper data. and I assigned the Vlan10 to GigabitEthernet0/1/0, the Vlan11 to GigabitEthernet0/1/1, all are access mode.



      enter image description here



      but now I cannot from 10.10.10.2 to ping 10.10.20.1:



      Router>ping 10.10.20.1

      Type escape sequence to abort.
      Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 10.10.20.1, timeout is 2 seconds:
      .....
      Success rate is 0 percent (0/5)


      the Center Router(Router11)'s route is bellow:



      Router#show ip route
      Codes: L - local, C - connected, S - static, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP
      D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area
      N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2
      E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2, E - EGP
      i - IS-IS, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2, ia - IS-IS inter area
      * - candidate default, U - per-user static route, o - ODR
      P - periodic downloaded static route

      Gateway of last resort is not set

      10.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 4 subnets, 2 masks
      C 10.10.10.0/24 is directly connected, Vlan10
      L 10.10.10.1/32 is directly connected, Vlan10
      C 10.10.20.0/24 is directly connected, Vlan11
      L 10.10.20.1/32 is directly connected, Vlan11




      So my questions are:




      1. Whether the Vlan10 and Vlan20 in the Center Router are two virtual router interfaces?

      2. Why the Router 10 can not ping the Router11?










      share|improve this question















      I have a ISP 4321 Router in my Cisco Packet Tracer. and I added a NIM-ES2-4 module in the Router, that provides four switching ports. and now, I configured two VLANs to the two switch port of them. and now it created the two VLANs, you can see below, there are Vlan10 and Vlan11:



      Router#show ip interface brief 
      Interface IP-Address OK? Method Status Protocol
      GigabitEthernet0/0/0 unassigned YES unset administratively down down
      GigabitEthernet0/0/1 unassigned YES unset administratively down down
      GigabitEthernet0/1/0 unassigned YES unset up up
      GigabitEthernet0/1/1 unassigned YES unset up up
      GigabitEthernet0/1/2 unassigned YES unset up down
      GigabitEthernet0/1/3 unassigned YES unset up down
      Vlan1 unassigned YES unset administratively down down
      Vlan10 10.10.10.1 YES manual up up
      Vlan11 10.10.20.1 YES manual up up


      I want to know whether the Vlan10 and Vlan11 are two virtual Router ports?





      If the Vlan10 and VLan11 are two virtual Router ports. I have configured the IP address on them, you can check the upper data. and I assigned the Vlan10 to GigabitEthernet0/1/0, the Vlan11 to GigabitEthernet0/1/1, all are access mode.



      enter image description here



      but now I cannot from 10.10.10.2 to ping 10.10.20.1:



      Router>ping 10.10.20.1

      Type escape sequence to abort.
      Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 10.10.20.1, timeout is 2 seconds:
      .....
      Success rate is 0 percent (0/5)


      the Center Router(Router11)'s route is bellow:



      Router#show ip route
      Codes: L - local, C - connected, S - static, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP
      D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area
      N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2
      E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2, E - EGP
      i - IS-IS, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2, ia - IS-IS inter area
      * - candidate default, U - per-user static route, o - ODR
      P - periodic downloaded static route

      Gateway of last resort is not set

      10.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 4 subnets, 2 masks
      C 10.10.10.0/24 is directly connected, Vlan10
      L 10.10.10.1/32 is directly connected, Vlan10
      C 10.10.20.0/24 is directly connected, Vlan11
      L 10.10.20.1/32 is directly connected, Vlan11




      So my questions are:




      1. Whether the Vlan10 and Vlan20 in the Center Router are two virtual router interfaces?

      2. Why the Router 10 can not ping the Router11?







      cisco routing router vlan






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 2 days ago









      Cown

      5,2153930




      5,2153930










      asked Nov 16 at 7:35









      three-blocks

      1706




      1706






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          6
          down vote



          accepted











          1. Yes, these also called switch virtual interfaces or SVI.

          2. Because your Router10 don't know how to get to 10.10.20.0/24 network.
            Add route to Router10 configuration:


          #(conf-t) ip route 10.10.20.0 255.255.255.0 10.10.10.1






          share|improve this answer





















          • thanks, bro. but there still a issue, after I added this static route to Router 10, I can ping the 10.10.20.1, but I can not ping the 10.10.20.2.
            – three-blocks
            2 days ago






          • 1




            @three-blocks, same thing here. Your Router4 (I'm assuming that he's got 10.10.20.2 IP) don't know anything about 10.10.10.0/24 network. So same solution: on Router4 #(conf-t) ip route 10.10.10.0 255.255.255.0 10.10.20.1
            – Andrey Prokhorov
            2 days ago










          • I got you, because there is no back. thank you, bro.
            – three-blocks
            2 days ago











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "496"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fnetworkengineering.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f54767%2fwhether-the-vlan10-and-vlan20-in-the-center-router-are-two-virtual-router-interf%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          6
          down vote



          accepted











          1. Yes, these also called switch virtual interfaces or SVI.

          2. Because your Router10 don't know how to get to 10.10.20.0/24 network.
            Add route to Router10 configuration:


          #(conf-t) ip route 10.10.20.0 255.255.255.0 10.10.10.1






          share|improve this answer





















          • thanks, bro. but there still a issue, after I added this static route to Router 10, I can ping the 10.10.20.1, but I can not ping the 10.10.20.2.
            – three-blocks
            2 days ago






          • 1




            @three-blocks, same thing here. Your Router4 (I'm assuming that he's got 10.10.20.2 IP) don't know anything about 10.10.10.0/24 network. So same solution: on Router4 #(conf-t) ip route 10.10.10.0 255.255.255.0 10.10.20.1
            – Andrey Prokhorov
            2 days ago










          • I got you, because there is no back. thank you, bro.
            – three-blocks
            2 days ago















          up vote
          6
          down vote



          accepted











          1. Yes, these also called switch virtual interfaces or SVI.

          2. Because your Router10 don't know how to get to 10.10.20.0/24 network.
            Add route to Router10 configuration:


          #(conf-t) ip route 10.10.20.0 255.255.255.0 10.10.10.1






          share|improve this answer





















          • thanks, bro. but there still a issue, after I added this static route to Router 10, I can ping the 10.10.20.1, but I can not ping the 10.10.20.2.
            – three-blocks
            2 days ago






          • 1




            @three-blocks, same thing here. Your Router4 (I'm assuming that he's got 10.10.20.2 IP) don't know anything about 10.10.10.0/24 network. So same solution: on Router4 #(conf-t) ip route 10.10.10.0 255.255.255.0 10.10.20.1
            – Andrey Prokhorov
            2 days ago










          • I got you, because there is no back. thank you, bro.
            – three-blocks
            2 days ago













          up vote
          6
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          6
          down vote



          accepted







          1. Yes, these also called switch virtual interfaces or SVI.

          2. Because your Router10 don't know how to get to 10.10.20.0/24 network.
            Add route to Router10 configuration:


          #(conf-t) ip route 10.10.20.0 255.255.255.0 10.10.10.1






          share|improve this answer













          1. Yes, these also called switch virtual interfaces or SVI.

          2. Because your Router10 don't know how to get to 10.10.20.0/24 network.
            Add route to Router10 configuration:


          #(conf-t) ip route 10.10.20.0 255.255.255.0 10.10.10.1







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 2 days ago









          Andrey Prokhorov

          1,480314




          1,480314












          • thanks, bro. but there still a issue, after I added this static route to Router 10, I can ping the 10.10.20.1, but I can not ping the 10.10.20.2.
            – three-blocks
            2 days ago






          • 1




            @three-blocks, same thing here. Your Router4 (I'm assuming that he's got 10.10.20.2 IP) don't know anything about 10.10.10.0/24 network. So same solution: on Router4 #(conf-t) ip route 10.10.10.0 255.255.255.0 10.10.20.1
            – Andrey Prokhorov
            2 days ago










          • I got you, because there is no back. thank you, bro.
            – three-blocks
            2 days ago


















          • thanks, bro. but there still a issue, after I added this static route to Router 10, I can ping the 10.10.20.1, but I can not ping the 10.10.20.2.
            – three-blocks
            2 days ago






          • 1




            @three-blocks, same thing here. Your Router4 (I'm assuming that he's got 10.10.20.2 IP) don't know anything about 10.10.10.0/24 network. So same solution: on Router4 #(conf-t) ip route 10.10.10.0 255.255.255.0 10.10.20.1
            – Andrey Prokhorov
            2 days ago










          • I got you, because there is no back. thank you, bro.
            – three-blocks
            2 days ago
















          thanks, bro. but there still a issue, after I added this static route to Router 10, I can ping the 10.10.20.1, but I can not ping the 10.10.20.2.
          – three-blocks
          2 days ago




          thanks, bro. but there still a issue, after I added this static route to Router 10, I can ping the 10.10.20.1, but I can not ping the 10.10.20.2.
          – three-blocks
          2 days ago




          1




          1




          @three-blocks, same thing here. Your Router4 (I'm assuming that he's got 10.10.20.2 IP) don't know anything about 10.10.10.0/24 network. So same solution: on Router4 #(conf-t) ip route 10.10.10.0 255.255.255.0 10.10.20.1
          – Andrey Prokhorov
          2 days ago




          @three-blocks, same thing here. Your Router4 (I'm assuming that he's got 10.10.20.2 IP) don't know anything about 10.10.10.0/24 network. So same solution: on Router4 #(conf-t) ip route 10.10.10.0 255.255.255.0 10.10.20.1
          – Andrey Prokhorov
          2 days ago












          I got you, because there is no back. thank you, bro.
          – three-blocks
          2 days ago




          I got you, because there is no back. thank you, bro.
          – three-blocks
          2 days ago


















           

          draft saved


          draft discarded



















































           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fnetworkengineering.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f54767%2fwhether-the-vlan10-and-vlan20-in-the-center-router-are-two-virtual-router-interf%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          數位音樂下載

          When can things happen in Etherscan, such as the picture below?

          格利澤436b