Is it OK to have a light that can only be controlled via automation?











up vote
3
down vote

favorite












I am retrofitting the main light in a room to be controlled by a home automation system, in this case, I'm using z-wave, but for purposes of this question, it could be any digital protocol.



I would like to have all switches that control the light do so using z-wave, and the actual dimmer circuit won't have a physical switch (it will be buried in the light fixture).



In other words, I will have no switches in the wall that actually break the connection or dim the light.



Is this ok from a code perspective? Does NEC have some kind of rule that I must have a switch in the room that physically controls the light?



If it's not ok, I'm looking for the particular part of the NEC that says that.










share|improve this question









New contributor




Jim B. is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • Can you fit wallbox remotes/control panels at the expected lighting control locations?
    – ThreePhaseEel
    Dec 10 at 23:54










  • I'd worry more about common sense, intended use cases, and what users of the space would expect, including fail conditions. Electronics fail, DIY projects fail, and commercial automation systems fail, so what will happen when this sytem fails? How will your users use it? I would always have a manual switch somewhere, unless there were other ways to get light in that space.
    – YetAnotherRandomUser
    Dec 11 at 3:22










  • @YetAnotherRandomUser -- even plain old single pole mechanical lightswitches go bad :P (whether it be due to arc damage on the contacts or mechanical wear and tear)
    – ThreePhaseEel
    Dec 11 at 4:31












  • @ThreePhaseEel Yes, that is true. Anything can go bad. However, those such light switches go bad at much less of a rate than DIY or commercial switching and dimming devices, so they make great backups to automation.
    – YetAnotherRandomUser
    Dec 11 at 15:09















up vote
3
down vote

favorite












I am retrofitting the main light in a room to be controlled by a home automation system, in this case, I'm using z-wave, but for purposes of this question, it could be any digital protocol.



I would like to have all switches that control the light do so using z-wave, and the actual dimmer circuit won't have a physical switch (it will be buried in the light fixture).



In other words, I will have no switches in the wall that actually break the connection or dim the light.



Is this ok from a code perspective? Does NEC have some kind of rule that I must have a switch in the room that physically controls the light?



If it's not ok, I'm looking for the particular part of the NEC that says that.










share|improve this question









New contributor




Jim B. is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • Can you fit wallbox remotes/control panels at the expected lighting control locations?
    – ThreePhaseEel
    Dec 10 at 23:54










  • I'd worry more about common sense, intended use cases, and what users of the space would expect, including fail conditions. Electronics fail, DIY projects fail, and commercial automation systems fail, so what will happen when this sytem fails? How will your users use it? I would always have a manual switch somewhere, unless there were other ways to get light in that space.
    – YetAnotherRandomUser
    Dec 11 at 3:22










  • @YetAnotherRandomUser -- even plain old single pole mechanical lightswitches go bad :P (whether it be due to arc damage on the contacts or mechanical wear and tear)
    – ThreePhaseEel
    Dec 11 at 4:31












  • @ThreePhaseEel Yes, that is true. Anything can go bad. However, those such light switches go bad at much less of a rate than DIY or commercial switching and dimming devices, so they make great backups to automation.
    – YetAnotherRandomUser
    Dec 11 at 15:09













up vote
3
down vote

favorite









up vote
3
down vote

favorite











I am retrofitting the main light in a room to be controlled by a home automation system, in this case, I'm using z-wave, but for purposes of this question, it could be any digital protocol.



I would like to have all switches that control the light do so using z-wave, and the actual dimmer circuit won't have a physical switch (it will be buried in the light fixture).



In other words, I will have no switches in the wall that actually break the connection or dim the light.



Is this ok from a code perspective? Does NEC have some kind of rule that I must have a switch in the room that physically controls the light?



If it's not ok, I'm looking for the particular part of the NEC that says that.










share|improve this question









New contributor




Jim B. is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











I am retrofitting the main light in a room to be controlled by a home automation system, in this case, I'm using z-wave, but for purposes of this question, it could be any digital protocol.



I would like to have all switches that control the light do so using z-wave, and the actual dimmer circuit won't have a physical switch (it will be buried in the light fixture).



In other words, I will have no switches in the wall that actually break the connection or dim the light.



Is this ok from a code perspective? Does NEC have some kind of rule that I must have a switch in the room that physically controls the light?



If it's not ok, I'm looking for the particular part of the NEC that says that.







lighting home-automation nec






share|improve this question









New contributor




Jim B. is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




Jim B. is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Dec 11 at 16:15





















New contributor




Jim B. is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked Dec 10 at 21:06









Jim B.

1184




1184




New contributor




Jim B. is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Jim B. is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Jim B. is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












  • Can you fit wallbox remotes/control panels at the expected lighting control locations?
    – ThreePhaseEel
    Dec 10 at 23:54










  • I'd worry more about common sense, intended use cases, and what users of the space would expect, including fail conditions. Electronics fail, DIY projects fail, and commercial automation systems fail, so what will happen when this sytem fails? How will your users use it? I would always have a manual switch somewhere, unless there were other ways to get light in that space.
    – YetAnotherRandomUser
    Dec 11 at 3:22










  • @YetAnotherRandomUser -- even plain old single pole mechanical lightswitches go bad :P (whether it be due to arc damage on the contacts or mechanical wear and tear)
    – ThreePhaseEel
    Dec 11 at 4:31












  • @ThreePhaseEel Yes, that is true. Anything can go bad. However, those such light switches go bad at much less of a rate than DIY or commercial switching and dimming devices, so they make great backups to automation.
    – YetAnotherRandomUser
    Dec 11 at 15:09


















  • Can you fit wallbox remotes/control panels at the expected lighting control locations?
    – ThreePhaseEel
    Dec 10 at 23:54










  • I'd worry more about common sense, intended use cases, and what users of the space would expect, including fail conditions. Electronics fail, DIY projects fail, and commercial automation systems fail, so what will happen when this sytem fails? How will your users use it? I would always have a manual switch somewhere, unless there were other ways to get light in that space.
    – YetAnotherRandomUser
    Dec 11 at 3:22










  • @YetAnotherRandomUser -- even plain old single pole mechanical lightswitches go bad :P (whether it be due to arc damage on the contacts or mechanical wear and tear)
    – ThreePhaseEel
    Dec 11 at 4:31












  • @ThreePhaseEel Yes, that is true. Anything can go bad. However, those such light switches go bad at much less of a rate than DIY or commercial switching and dimming devices, so they make great backups to automation.
    – YetAnotherRandomUser
    Dec 11 at 15:09
















Can you fit wallbox remotes/control panels at the expected lighting control locations?
– ThreePhaseEel
Dec 10 at 23:54




Can you fit wallbox remotes/control panels at the expected lighting control locations?
– ThreePhaseEel
Dec 10 at 23:54












I'd worry more about common sense, intended use cases, and what users of the space would expect, including fail conditions. Electronics fail, DIY projects fail, and commercial automation systems fail, so what will happen when this sytem fails? How will your users use it? I would always have a manual switch somewhere, unless there were other ways to get light in that space.
– YetAnotherRandomUser
Dec 11 at 3:22




I'd worry more about common sense, intended use cases, and what users of the space would expect, including fail conditions. Electronics fail, DIY projects fail, and commercial automation systems fail, so what will happen when this sytem fails? How will your users use it? I would always have a manual switch somewhere, unless there were other ways to get light in that space.
– YetAnotherRandomUser
Dec 11 at 3:22












@YetAnotherRandomUser -- even plain old single pole mechanical lightswitches go bad :P (whether it be due to arc damage on the contacts or mechanical wear and tear)
– ThreePhaseEel
Dec 11 at 4:31






@YetAnotherRandomUser -- even plain old single pole mechanical lightswitches go bad :P (whether it be due to arc damage on the contacts or mechanical wear and tear)
– ThreePhaseEel
Dec 11 at 4:31














@ThreePhaseEel Yes, that is true. Anything can go bad. However, those such light switches go bad at much less of a rate than DIY or commercial switching and dimming devices, so they make great backups to automation.
– YetAnotherRandomUser
Dec 11 at 15:09




@ThreePhaseEel Yes, that is true. Anything can go bad. However, those such light switches go bad at much less of a rate than DIY or commercial switching and dimming devices, so they make great backups to automation.
– YetAnotherRandomUser
Dec 11 at 15:09










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
4
down vote



accepted










The NEC requirement is that it be possible to turn on a light in a room, via a switch that is in a reasonably expected location.



If you need your phone to turn the light on, that's a no go.



NEC is not particular about whether the lamp is a permanently installed light, or a plug-in floor lamp. The floor lamp is allowed to have a switch on itself, which if turned off, defeats the room switch.



NEC is also not particular about the technology used, as long as it's listed. It just needs to work.



However, they may be other building codes which come to bear. There is also your local jurisdiction's interpretation, their local rules, and the ultimate nuke: the ability of the jurisdiction to revoke a home's occupancy permit if the arragement proves to be problematic.






share|improve this answer























  • Do you happen to know the section of the code that governs this?
    – Jim B.
    Dec 12 at 2:45










  • @JimB. NEC 210.70.
    – Harper
    Dec 12 at 5:02


















up vote
2
down vote













This isn't as novel as you think



Many commercial buildings use a similar setup, with low-voltage wired controls at the switch locations on the wall talking to a central dimmer panel that handles the actual dimming duty for a set of lighting circuits, instead of using individual wallbox-mounted line-voltage controls. So, as long as the Z-wave remotes you plan to wall-mount are reliably powered (so they won't quit working unexpectedly due to a dead battery, for instance) and can provide the expected degree of lighting control, I think this will be fine.






share|improve this answer





















  • Although not directly controlled won't the op need a "override" switch located in the room? It could talk to the z wave, I know I have to have over rides in commercial facilities, and thought the switched outlet or light was required in residential.
    – Ed Beal
    Dec 11 at 0:36










  • @EdBeal -- the wired remote is the required switch in this case
    – ThreePhaseEel
    Dec 11 at 3:06












  • I guess I don't see the physical switch the op said the controll would be in the fixture no switch in the room that's where I would think a problem may be.
    – Ed Beal
    Dec 11 at 13:17











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "73"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});






Jim B. is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdiy.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f152420%2fis-it-ok-to-have-a-light-that-can-only-be-controlled-via-automation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
4
down vote



accepted










The NEC requirement is that it be possible to turn on a light in a room, via a switch that is in a reasonably expected location.



If you need your phone to turn the light on, that's a no go.



NEC is not particular about whether the lamp is a permanently installed light, or a plug-in floor lamp. The floor lamp is allowed to have a switch on itself, which if turned off, defeats the room switch.



NEC is also not particular about the technology used, as long as it's listed. It just needs to work.



However, they may be other building codes which come to bear. There is also your local jurisdiction's interpretation, their local rules, and the ultimate nuke: the ability of the jurisdiction to revoke a home's occupancy permit if the arragement proves to be problematic.






share|improve this answer























  • Do you happen to know the section of the code that governs this?
    – Jim B.
    Dec 12 at 2:45










  • @JimB. NEC 210.70.
    – Harper
    Dec 12 at 5:02















up vote
4
down vote



accepted










The NEC requirement is that it be possible to turn on a light in a room, via a switch that is in a reasonably expected location.



If you need your phone to turn the light on, that's a no go.



NEC is not particular about whether the lamp is a permanently installed light, or a plug-in floor lamp. The floor lamp is allowed to have a switch on itself, which if turned off, defeats the room switch.



NEC is also not particular about the technology used, as long as it's listed. It just needs to work.



However, they may be other building codes which come to bear. There is also your local jurisdiction's interpretation, their local rules, and the ultimate nuke: the ability of the jurisdiction to revoke a home's occupancy permit if the arragement proves to be problematic.






share|improve this answer























  • Do you happen to know the section of the code that governs this?
    – Jim B.
    Dec 12 at 2:45










  • @JimB. NEC 210.70.
    – Harper
    Dec 12 at 5:02













up vote
4
down vote



accepted







up vote
4
down vote



accepted






The NEC requirement is that it be possible to turn on a light in a room, via a switch that is in a reasonably expected location.



If you need your phone to turn the light on, that's a no go.



NEC is not particular about whether the lamp is a permanently installed light, or a plug-in floor lamp. The floor lamp is allowed to have a switch on itself, which if turned off, defeats the room switch.



NEC is also not particular about the technology used, as long as it's listed. It just needs to work.



However, they may be other building codes which come to bear. There is also your local jurisdiction's interpretation, their local rules, and the ultimate nuke: the ability of the jurisdiction to revoke a home's occupancy permit if the arragement proves to be problematic.






share|improve this answer














The NEC requirement is that it be possible to turn on a light in a room, via a switch that is in a reasonably expected location.



If you need your phone to turn the light on, that's a no go.



NEC is not particular about whether the lamp is a permanently installed light, or a plug-in floor lamp. The floor lamp is allowed to have a switch on itself, which if turned off, defeats the room switch.



NEC is also not particular about the technology used, as long as it's listed. It just needs to work.



However, they may be other building codes which come to bear. There is also your local jurisdiction's interpretation, their local rules, and the ultimate nuke: the ability of the jurisdiction to revoke a home's occupancy permit if the arragement proves to be problematic.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Dec 11 at 1:05

























answered Dec 10 at 21:25









Harper

63.8k341130




63.8k341130












  • Do you happen to know the section of the code that governs this?
    – Jim B.
    Dec 12 at 2:45










  • @JimB. NEC 210.70.
    – Harper
    Dec 12 at 5:02


















  • Do you happen to know the section of the code that governs this?
    – Jim B.
    Dec 12 at 2:45










  • @JimB. NEC 210.70.
    – Harper
    Dec 12 at 5:02
















Do you happen to know the section of the code that governs this?
– Jim B.
Dec 12 at 2:45




Do you happen to know the section of the code that governs this?
– Jim B.
Dec 12 at 2:45












@JimB. NEC 210.70.
– Harper
Dec 12 at 5:02




@JimB. NEC 210.70.
– Harper
Dec 12 at 5:02












up vote
2
down vote













This isn't as novel as you think



Many commercial buildings use a similar setup, with low-voltage wired controls at the switch locations on the wall talking to a central dimmer panel that handles the actual dimming duty for a set of lighting circuits, instead of using individual wallbox-mounted line-voltage controls. So, as long as the Z-wave remotes you plan to wall-mount are reliably powered (so they won't quit working unexpectedly due to a dead battery, for instance) and can provide the expected degree of lighting control, I think this will be fine.






share|improve this answer





















  • Although not directly controlled won't the op need a "override" switch located in the room? It could talk to the z wave, I know I have to have over rides in commercial facilities, and thought the switched outlet or light was required in residential.
    – Ed Beal
    Dec 11 at 0:36










  • @EdBeal -- the wired remote is the required switch in this case
    – ThreePhaseEel
    Dec 11 at 3:06












  • I guess I don't see the physical switch the op said the controll would be in the fixture no switch in the room that's where I would think a problem may be.
    – Ed Beal
    Dec 11 at 13:17















up vote
2
down vote













This isn't as novel as you think



Many commercial buildings use a similar setup, with low-voltage wired controls at the switch locations on the wall talking to a central dimmer panel that handles the actual dimming duty for a set of lighting circuits, instead of using individual wallbox-mounted line-voltage controls. So, as long as the Z-wave remotes you plan to wall-mount are reliably powered (so they won't quit working unexpectedly due to a dead battery, for instance) and can provide the expected degree of lighting control, I think this will be fine.






share|improve this answer





















  • Although not directly controlled won't the op need a "override" switch located in the room? It could talk to the z wave, I know I have to have over rides in commercial facilities, and thought the switched outlet or light was required in residential.
    – Ed Beal
    Dec 11 at 0:36










  • @EdBeal -- the wired remote is the required switch in this case
    – ThreePhaseEel
    Dec 11 at 3:06












  • I guess I don't see the physical switch the op said the controll would be in the fixture no switch in the room that's where I would think a problem may be.
    – Ed Beal
    Dec 11 at 13:17













up vote
2
down vote










up vote
2
down vote









This isn't as novel as you think



Many commercial buildings use a similar setup, with low-voltage wired controls at the switch locations on the wall talking to a central dimmer panel that handles the actual dimming duty for a set of lighting circuits, instead of using individual wallbox-mounted line-voltage controls. So, as long as the Z-wave remotes you plan to wall-mount are reliably powered (so they won't quit working unexpectedly due to a dead battery, for instance) and can provide the expected degree of lighting control, I think this will be fine.






share|improve this answer












This isn't as novel as you think



Many commercial buildings use a similar setup, with low-voltage wired controls at the switch locations on the wall talking to a central dimmer panel that handles the actual dimming duty for a set of lighting circuits, instead of using individual wallbox-mounted line-voltage controls. So, as long as the Z-wave remotes you plan to wall-mount are reliably powered (so they won't quit working unexpectedly due to a dead battery, for instance) and can provide the expected degree of lighting control, I think this will be fine.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Dec 10 at 23:57









ThreePhaseEel

29.5k104590




29.5k104590












  • Although not directly controlled won't the op need a "override" switch located in the room? It could talk to the z wave, I know I have to have over rides in commercial facilities, and thought the switched outlet or light was required in residential.
    – Ed Beal
    Dec 11 at 0:36










  • @EdBeal -- the wired remote is the required switch in this case
    – ThreePhaseEel
    Dec 11 at 3:06












  • I guess I don't see the physical switch the op said the controll would be in the fixture no switch in the room that's where I would think a problem may be.
    – Ed Beal
    Dec 11 at 13:17


















  • Although not directly controlled won't the op need a "override" switch located in the room? It could talk to the z wave, I know I have to have over rides in commercial facilities, and thought the switched outlet or light was required in residential.
    – Ed Beal
    Dec 11 at 0:36










  • @EdBeal -- the wired remote is the required switch in this case
    – ThreePhaseEel
    Dec 11 at 3:06












  • I guess I don't see the physical switch the op said the controll would be in the fixture no switch in the room that's where I would think a problem may be.
    – Ed Beal
    Dec 11 at 13:17
















Although not directly controlled won't the op need a "override" switch located in the room? It could talk to the z wave, I know I have to have over rides in commercial facilities, and thought the switched outlet or light was required in residential.
– Ed Beal
Dec 11 at 0:36




Although not directly controlled won't the op need a "override" switch located in the room? It could talk to the z wave, I know I have to have over rides in commercial facilities, and thought the switched outlet or light was required in residential.
– Ed Beal
Dec 11 at 0:36












@EdBeal -- the wired remote is the required switch in this case
– ThreePhaseEel
Dec 11 at 3:06






@EdBeal -- the wired remote is the required switch in this case
– ThreePhaseEel
Dec 11 at 3:06














I guess I don't see the physical switch the op said the controll would be in the fixture no switch in the room that's where I would think a problem may be.
– Ed Beal
Dec 11 at 13:17




I guess I don't see the physical switch the op said the controll would be in the fixture no switch in the room that's where I would think a problem may be.
– Ed Beal
Dec 11 at 13:17










Jim B. is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










draft saved

draft discarded


















Jim B. is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













Jim B. is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












Jim B. is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















Thanks for contributing an answer to Home Improvement Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdiy.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f152420%2fis-it-ok-to-have-a-light-that-can-only-be-controlled-via-automation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

數位音樂下載

When can things happen in Etherscan, such as the picture below?

格利澤436b