When did the word “guys” become popular as a gender-neutral word?
It's normal nowadays to walk into a room (men and women, boys and girls etc) and go, "Hey guys!". Has this always been the case, or what?
etymology expressions usage slang gender
add a comment |
It's normal nowadays to walk into a room (men and women, boys and girls etc) and go, "Hey guys!". Has this always been the case, or what?
etymology expressions usage slang gender
2
It has not always been the case. It was originally an eponym for Guy Fawkes. Later, it was used to describe someone dressed up in an unsettling costume. By in the middle of the 19th century, it began to be used to refer to males. Sometime during the 20th century, it began to see use as a gender-neutral term, but only in the plural. You may remember "Hey you guys!" on the Electric Company. This article was the best I could find on the subject: slate.com/blogs/lexicon_valley/2016/02/10/…
– Christopher Issac
Feb 10 '18 at 8:39
1
First I would like to give a related link to a question, which regards if it is acceptable, however while doing so I would also like to note that this question asks when it became acceptable, which is a matter that is as of yet unaddressed in the other question, so I am also of the opinion that the related question is not a duplicate. I am mostly just doing this so we can sort which answers should go where properly.
– Tonepoet
Feb 10 '18 at 12:58
1. Is it really 'normal' ? 2. Is it really 'popular' ? 3. Is it really 'gender-neutral' ? 4. When did 'nowadays' start ? I think some facts are needed.
– Nigel J
Feb 10 '18 at 14:43
Some relevant background: What is a feminine version of guys?
– Mitch
Feb 10 '18 at 20:05
add a comment |
It's normal nowadays to walk into a room (men and women, boys and girls etc) and go, "Hey guys!". Has this always been the case, or what?
etymology expressions usage slang gender
It's normal nowadays to walk into a room (men and women, boys and girls etc) and go, "Hey guys!". Has this always been the case, or what?
etymology expressions usage slang gender
etymology expressions usage slang gender
asked Feb 10 '18 at 8:11
Jane LautnerJane Lautner
1612
1612
2
It has not always been the case. It was originally an eponym for Guy Fawkes. Later, it was used to describe someone dressed up in an unsettling costume. By in the middle of the 19th century, it began to be used to refer to males. Sometime during the 20th century, it began to see use as a gender-neutral term, but only in the plural. You may remember "Hey you guys!" on the Electric Company. This article was the best I could find on the subject: slate.com/blogs/lexicon_valley/2016/02/10/…
– Christopher Issac
Feb 10 '18 at 8:39
1
First I would like to give a related link to a question, which regards if it is acceptable, however while doing so I would also like to note that this question asks when it became acceptable, which is a matter that is as of yet unaddressed in the other question, so I am also of the opinion that the related question is not a duplicate. I am mostly just doing this so we can sort which answers should go where properly.
– Tonepoet
Feb 10 '18 at 12:58
1. Is it really 'normal' ? 2. Is it really 'popular' ? 3. Is it really 'gender-neutral' ? 4. When did 'nowadays' start ? I think some facts are needed.
– Nigel J
Feb 10 '18 at 14:43
Some relevant background: What is a feminine version of guys?
– Mitch
Feb 10 '18 at 20:05
add a comment |
2
It has not always been the case. It was originally an eponym for Guy Fawkes. Later, it was used to describe someone dressed up in an unsettling costume. By in the middle of the 19th century, it began to be used to refer to males. Sometime during the 20th century, it began to see use as a gender-neutral term, but only in the plural. You may remember "Hey you guys!" on the Electric Company. This article was the best I could find on the subject: slate.com/blogs/lexicon_valley/2016/02/10/…
– Christopher Issac
Feb 10 '18 at 8:39
1
First I would like to give a related link to a question, which regards if it is acceptable, however while doing so I would also like to note that this question asks when it became acceptable, which is a matter that is as of yet unaddressed in the other question, so I am also of the opinion that the related question is not a duplicate. I am mostly just doing this so we can sort which answers should go where properly.
– Tonepoet
Feb 10 '18 at 12:58
1. Is it really 'normal' ? 2. Is it really 'popular' ? 3. Is it really 'gender-neutral' ? 4. When did 'nowadays' start ? I think some facts are needed.
– Nigel J
Feb 10 '18 at 14:43
Some relevant background: What is a feminine version of guys?
– Mitch
Feb 10 '18 at 20:05
2
2
It has not always been the case. It was originally an eponym for Guy Fawkes. Later, it was used to describe someone dressed up in an unsettling costume. By in the middle of the 19th century, it began to be used to refer to males. Sometime during the 20th century, it began to see use as a gender-neutral term, but only in the plural. You may remember "Hey you guys!" on the Electric Company. This article was the best I could find on the subject: slate.com/blogs/lexicon_valley/2016/02/10/…
– Christopher Issac
Feb 10 '18 at 8:39
It has not always been the case. It was originally an eponym for Guy Fawkes. Later, it was used to describe someone dressed up in an unsettling costume. By in the middle of the 19th century, it began to be used to refer to males. Sometime during the 20th century, it began to see use as a gender-neutral term, but only in the plural. You may remember "Hey you guys!" on the Electric Company. This article was the best I could find on the subject: slate.com/blogs/lexicon_valley/2016/02/10/…
– Christopher Issac
Feb 10 '18 at 8:39
1
1
First I would like to give a related link to a question, which regards if it is acceptable, however while doing so I would also like to note that this question asks when it became acceptable, which is a matter that is as of yet unaddressed in the other question, so I am also of the opinion that the related question is not a duplicate. I am mostly just doing this so we can sort which answers should go where properly.
– Tonepoet
Feb 10 '18 at 12:58
First I would like to give a related link to a question, which regards if it is acceptable, however while doing so I would also like to note that this question asks when it became acceptable, which is a matter that is as of yet unaddressed in the other question, so I am also of the opinion that the related question is not a duplicate. I am mostly just doing this so we can sort which answers should go where properly.
– Tonepoet
Feb 10 '18 at 12:58
1. Is it really 'normal' ? 2. Is it really 'popular' ? 3. Is it really 'gender-neutral' ? 4. When did 'nowadays' start ? I think some facts are needed.
– Nigel J
Feb 10 '18 at 14:43
1. Is it really 'normal' ? 2. Is it really 'popular' ? 3. Is it really 'gender-neutral' ? 4. When did 'nowadays' start ? I think some facts are needed.
– Nigel J
Feb 10 '18 at 14:43
Some relevant background: What is a feminine version of guys?
– Mitch
Feb 10 '18 at 20:05
Some relevant background: What is a feminine version of guys?
– Mitch
Feb 10 '18 at 20:05
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
It has not always been the case. The term "guy" first referred to "an effigy of Guy Fawkes traditionally burnt on the evening of November the Fifth, usually with a display of fireworks" according to the OED; this sense is first attested in 1806.
The word first began to refer to a man or group of men in 1876, also according to the OED's examples.
Unfortunately, the OED is not clear on when it began to be gender neutral. However, I did find some other sources that try to answer that question.
“Denotatively, this is an established use of ‘guys’ to mean ‘people’ — that use goes back a while, probably to the mid-1900s,” said Kory Stamper, a lexicographer and editor at Merriam-Webster.
An unnecessarily long and surprisingly fascinating history of ‘guys’
Macquarie Dictionary senior editor Victoria Morgan said in Australia, teenagers started using "guys" as a gender neutral term in the '80s and it has been since been used to refer to groups of people of both gender. She added the word "guys" was not a term that carried an inherently sexist connotation and came into usage without any power struggle between the genders.
Hey guys: Oxford, Macquarie dictionary experts say using 'guys' is not sexist
It is important to note that "gender neutral guys" is used in other dialects of English, notably mine (as this graph shows, pretty much everywhere in America uses it except for the south).
add a comment |
The Southern American translation of "Hey, you guys!" is "Hey, y'all!", which suggests that the informal second person plural guys addressing a mixed gender group is 1) the same inclusive/generic masculine that's been around for centuries, but 2) is perceived by those using the form to be gender neutral, and 3) the source of other plural uses in the third person that may seem gender neutral or not depending on circumstance and audience.
Wiktionary has the following usage note:
In plural, guys is not completely gender-neutral but it may refer to people of either sex in some circumstances and forms; the greeting “Hey guys” can generally refer to people of either gender. This usage is not always seen as accurate or correct. Referring to a group as “guys” usually means a group of men or a mixed-gender group, since describing a group of women as guys, as in “The Pussycat Dolls are a bunch of guys”, suggests that they are male, and is generally viewed as incorrect or inaccurate in that usage. In contrast, the all-male band Green Day could accurately be described as “a bunch of guys” in slang. The usage of the plural guys in the phrase “some guys chased them away” would generally be assumed to mean men rather than women.
When used of animals, guy usually refers to either a male or one whose gender is not known; it is rarely if ever used of an animal that is known to be female.
In some varieties of US and Canadian English, you guys revives the distinction between a singular and plural you, much like y'all in other varieties; in this sense, guys is gender-neutral.
You can also read there how the etymology really goes back to Guy Fawkes and that in earlier centuries, a woman dressed like a guy most likely wasn't in a flannel shirt, jeans, and workboots.
2
Hi KarlG. I don't really think this answer addresses the specific question being asked here. Are trying to imply that it was always acceptable, or if not, could you please try to give us a date of when it happened? I surmise that Jane is most particularly interested in when sense 3 transitioned into sense 4 in particular.
– Tonepoet
Feb 10 '18 at 13:01
The answer to the question "Has this always been the case, or what?" is not the same as asking when something happened, although that would be an interesting factoid, I suppose. On the other hand, the expression seems to have survived intact the demand for "mail carrier" vs. "postman" since the 1980s — most likely because it fills the lexical gap of second person plural outside of the South.
– KarlG
Feb 10 '18 at 16:04
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f430448%2fwhen-did-the-word-guys-become-popular-as-a-gender-neutral-word%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
It has not always been the case. The term "guy" first referred to "an effigy of Guy Fawkes traditionally burnt on the evening of November the Fifth, usually with a display of fireworks" according to the OED; this sense is first attested in 1806.
The word first began to refer to a man or group of men in 1876, also according to the OED's examples.
Unfortunately, the OED is not clear on when it began to be gender neutral. However, I did find some other sources that try to answer that question.
“Denotatively, this is an established use of ‘guys’ to mean ‘people’ — that use goes back a while, probably to the mid-1900s,” said Kory Stamper, a lexicographer and editor at Merriam-Webster.
An unnecessarily long and surprisingly fascinating history of ‘guys’
Macquarie Dictionary senior editor Victoria Morgan said in Australia, teenagers started using "guys" as a gender neutral term in the '80s and it has been since been used to refer to groups of people of both gender. She added the word "guys" was not a term that carried an inherently sexist connotation and came into usage without any power struggle between the genders.
Hey guys: Oxford, Macquarie dictionary experts say using 'guys' is not sexist
It is important to note that "gender neutral guys" is used in other dialects of English, notably mine (as this graph shows, pretty much everywhere in America uses it except for the south).
add a comment |
It has not always been the case. The term "guy" first referred to "an effigy of Guy Fawkes traditionally burnt on the evening of November the Fifth, usually with a display of fireworks" according to the OED; this sense is first attested in 1806.
The word first began to refer to a man or group of men in 1876, also according to the OED's examples.
Unfortunately, the OED is not clear on when it began to be gender neutral. However, I did find some other sources that try to answer that question.
“Denotatively, this is an established use of ‘guys’ to mean ‘people’ — that use goes back a while, probably to the mid-1900s,” said Kory Stamper, a lexicographer and editor at Merriam-Webster.
An unnecessarily long and surprisingly fascinating history of ‘guys’
Macquarie Dictionary senior editor Victoria Morgan said in Australia, teenagers started using "guys" as a gender neutral term in the '80s and it has been since been used to refer to groups of people of both gender. She added the word "guys" was not a term that carried an inherently sexist connotation and came into usage without any power struggle between the genders.
Hey guys: Oxford, Macquarie dictionary experts say using 'guys' is not sexist
It is important to note that "gender neutral guys" is used in other dialects of English, notably mine (as this graph shows, pretty much everywhere in America uses it except for the south).
add a comment |
It has not always been the case. The term "guy" first referred to "an effigy of Guy Fawkes traditionally burnt on the evening of November the Fifth, usually with a display of fireworks" according to the OED; this sense is first attested in 1806.
The word first began to refer to a man or group of men in 1876, also according to the OED's examples.
Unfortunately, the OED is not clear on when it began to be gender neutral. However, I did find some other sources that try to answer that question.
“Denotatively, this is an established use of ‘guys’ to mean ‘people’ — that use goes back a while, probably to the mid-1900s,” said Kory Stamper, a lexicographer and editor at Merriam-Webster.
An unnecessarily long and surprisingly fascinating history of ‘guys’
Macquarie Dictionary senior editor Victoria Morgan said in Australia, teenagers started using "guys" as a gender neutral term in the '80s and it has been since been used to refer to groups of people of both gender. She added the word "guys" was not a term that carried an inherently sexist connotation and came into usage without any power struggle between the genders.
Hey guys: Oxford, Macquarie dictionary experts say using 'guys' is not sexist
It is important to note that "gender neutral guys" is used in other dialects of English, notably mine (as this graph shows, pretty much everywhere in America uses it except for the south).
It has not always been the case. The term "guy" first referred to "an effigy of Guy Fawkes traditionally burnt on the evening of November the Fifth, usually with a display of fireworks" according to the OED; this sense is first attested in 1806.
The word first began to refer to a man or group of men in 1876, also according to the OED's examples.
Unfortunately, the OED is not clear on when it began to be gender neutral. However, I did find some other sources that try to answer that question.
“Denotatively, this is an established use of ‘guys’ to mean ‘people’ — that use goes back a while, probably to the mid-1900s,” said Kory Stamper, a lexicographer and editor at Merriam-Webster.
An unnecessarily long and surprisingly fascinating history of ‘guys’
Macquarie Dictionary senior editor Victoria Morgan said in Australia, teenagers started using "guys" as a gender neutral term in the '80s and it has been since been used to refer to groups of people of both gender. She added the word "guys" was not a term that carried an inherently sexist connotation and came into usage without any power struggle between the genders.
Hey guys: Oxford, Macquarie dictionary experts say using 'guys' is not sexist
It is important to note that "gender neutral guys" is used in other dialects of English, notably mine (as this graph shows, pretty much everywhere in America uses it except for the south).
edited 24 mins ago
answered Feb 10 '18 at 16:49
LaurelLaurel
31.6k660112
31.6k660112
add a comment |
add a comment |
The Southern American translation of "Hey, you guys!" is "Hey, y'all!", which suggests that the informal second person plural guys addressing a mixed gender group is 1) the same inclusive/generic masculine that's been around for centuries, but 2) is perceived by those using the form to be gender neutral, and 3) the source of other plural uses in the third person that may seem gender neutral or not depending on circumstance and audience.
Wiktionary has the following usage note:
In plural, guys is not completely gender-neutral but it may refer to people of either sex in some circumstances and forms; the greeting “Hey guys” can generally refer to people of either gender. This usage is not always seen as accurate or correct. Referring to a group as “guys” usually means a group of men or a mixed-gender group, since describing a group of women as guys, as in “The Pussycat Dolls are a bunch of guys”, suggests that they are male, and is generally viewed as incorrect or inaccurate in that usage. In contrast, the all-male band Green Day could accurately be described as “a bunch of guys” in slang. The usage of the plural guys in the phrase “some guys chased them away” would generally be assumed to mean men rather than women.
When used of animals, guy usually refers to either a male or one whose gender is not known; it is rarely if ever used of an animal that is known to be female.
In some varieties of US and Canadian English, you guys revives the distinction between a singular and plural you, much like y'all in other varieties; in this sense, guys is gender-neutral.
You can also read there how the etymology really goes back to Guy Fawkes and that in earlier centuries, a woman dressed like a guy most likely wasn't in a flannel shirt, jeans, and workboots.
2
Hi KarlG. I don't really think this answer addresses the specific question being asked here. Are trying to imply that it was always acceptable, or if not, could you please try to give us a date of when it happened? I surmise that Jane is most particularly interested in when sense 3 transitioned into sense 4 in particular.
– Tonepoet
Feb 10 '18 at 13:01
The answer to the question "Has this always been the case, or what?" is not the same as asking when something happened, although that would be an interesting factoid, I suppose. On the other hand, the expression seems to have survived intact the demand for "mail carrier" vs. "postman" since the 1980s — most likely because it fills the lexical gap of second person plural outside of the South.
– KarlG
Feb 10 '18 at 16:04
add a comment |
The Southern American translation of "Hey, you guys!" is "Hey, y'all!", which suggests that the informal second person plural guys addressing a mixed gender group is 1) the same inclusive/generic masculine that's been around for centuries, but 2) is perceived by those using the form to be gender neutral, and 3) the source of other plural uses in the third person that may seem gender neutral or not depending on circumstance and audience.
Wiktionary has the following usage note:
In plural, guys is not completely gender-neutral but it may refer to people of either sex in some circumstances and forms; the greeting “Hey guys” can generally refer to people of either gender. This usage is not always seen as accurate or correct. Referring to a group as “guys” usually means a group of men or a mixed-gender group, since describing a group of women as guys, as in “The Pussycat Dolls are a bunch of guys”, suggests that they are male, and is generally viewed as incorrect or inaccurate in that usage. In contrast, the all-male band Green Day could accurately be described as “a bunch of guys” in slang. The usage of the plural guys in the phrase “some guys chased them away” would generally be assumed to mean men rather than women.
When used of animals, guy usually refers to either a male or one whose gender is not known; it is rarely if ever used of an animal that is known to be female.
In some varieties of US and Canadian English, you guys revives the distinction between a singular and plural you, much like y'all in other varieties; in this sense, guys is gender-neutral.
You can also read there how the etymology really goes back to Guy Fawkes and that in earlier centuries, a woman dressed like a guy most likely wasn't in a flannel shirt, jeans, and workboots.
2
Hi KarlG. I don't really think this answer addresses the specific question being asked here. Are trying to imply that it was always acceptable, or if not, could you please try to give us a date of when it happened? I surmise that Jane is most particularly interested in when sense 3 transitioned into sense 4 in particular.
– Tonepoet
Feb 10 '18 at 13:01
The answer to the question "Has this always been the case, or what?" is not the same as asking when something happened, although that would be an interesting factoid, I suppose. On the other hand, the expression seems to have survived intact the demand for "mail carrier" vs. "postman" since the 1980s — most likely because it fills the lexical gap of second person plural outside of the South.
– KarlG
Feb 10 '18 at 16:04
add a comment |
The Southern American translation of "Hey, you guys!" is "Hey, y'all!", which suggests that the informal second person plural guys addressing a mixed gender group is 1) the same inclusive/generic masculine that's been around for centuries, but 2) is perceived by those using the form to be gender neutral, and 3) the source of other plural uses in the third person that may seem gender neutral or not depending on circumstance and audience.
Wiktionary has the following usage note:
In plural, guys is not completely gender-neutral but it may refer to people of either sex in some circumstances and forms; the greeting “Hey guys” can generally refer to people of either gender. This usage is not always seen as accurate or correct. Referring to a group as “guys” usually means a group of men or a mixed-gender group, since describing a group of women as guys, as in “The Pussycat Dolls are a bunch of guys”, suggests that they are male, and is generally viewed as incorrect or inaccurate in that usage. In contrast, the all-male band Green Day could accurately be described as “a bunch of guys” in slang. The usage of the plural guys in the phrase “some guys chased them away” would generally be assumed to mean men rather than women.
When used of animals, guy usually refers to either a male or one whose gender is not known; it is rarely if ever used of an animal that is known to be female.
In some varieties of US and Canadian English, you guys revives the distinction between a singular and plural you, much like y'all in other varieties; in this sense, guys is gender-neutral.
You can also read there how the etymology really goes back to Guy Fawkes and that in earlier centuries, a woman dressed like a guy most likely wasn't in a flannel shirt, jeans, and workboots.
The Southern American translation of "Hey, you guys!" is "Hey, y'all!", which suggests that the informal second person plural guys addressing a mixed gender group is 1) the same inclusive/generic masculine that's been around for centuries, but 2) is perceived by those using the form to be gender neutral, and 3) the source of other plural uses in the third person that may seem gender neutral or not depending on circumstance and audience.
Wiktionary has the following usage note:
In plural, guys is not completely gender-neutral but it may refer to people of either sex in some circumstances and forms; the greeting “Hey guys” can generally refer to people of either gender. This usage is not always seen as accurate or correct. Referring to a group as “guys” usually means a group of men or a mixed-gender group, since describing a group of women as guys, as in “The Pussycat Dolls are a bunch of guys”, suggests that they are male, and is generally viewed as incorrect or inaccurate in that usage. In contrast, the all-male band Green Day could accurately be described as “a bunch of guys” in slang. The usage of the plural guys in the phrase “some guys chased them away” would generally be assumed to mean men rather than women.
When used of animals, guy usually refers to either a male or one whose gender is not known; it is rarely if ever used of an animal that is known to be female.
In some varieties of US and Canadian English, you guys revives the distinction between a singular and plural you, much like y'all in other varieties; in this sense, guys is gender-neutral.
You can also read there how the etymology really goes back to Guy Fawkes and that in earlier centuries, a woman dressed like a guy most likely wasn't in a flannel shirt, jeans, and workboots.
edited Feb 10 '18 at 12:30
answered Feb 10 '18 at 9:09
KarlGKarlG
19.7k52855
19.7k52855
2
Hi KarlG. I don't really think this answer addresses the specific question being asked here. Are trying to imply that it was always acceptable, or if not, could you please try to give us a date of when it happened? I surmise that Jane is most particularly interested in when sense 3 transitioned into sense 4 in particular.
– Tonepoet
Feb 10 '18 at 13:01
The answer to the question "Has this always been the case, or what?" is not the same as asking when something happened, although that would be an interesting factoid, I suppose. On the other hand, the expression seems to have survived intact the demand for "mail carrier" vs. "postman" since the 1980s — most likely because it fills the lexical gap of second person plural outside of the South.
– KarlG
Feb 10 '18 at 16:04
add a comment |
2
Hi KarlG. I don't really think this answer addresses the specific question being asked here. Are trying to imply that it was always acceptable, or if not, could you please try to give us a date of when it happened? I surmise that Jane is most particularly interested in when sense 3 transitioned into sense 4 in particular.
– Tonepoet
Feb 10 '18 at 13:01
The answer to the question "Has this always been the case, or what?" is not the same as asking when something happened, although that would be an interesting factoid, I suppose. On the other hand, the expression seems to have survived intact the demand for "mail carrier" vs. "postman" since the 1980s — most likely because it fills the lexical gap of second person plural outside of the South.
– KarlG
Feb 10 '18 at 16:04
2
2
Hi KarlG. I don't really think this answer addresses the specific question being asked here. Are trying to imply that it was always acceptable, or if not, could you please try to give us a date of when it happened? I surmise that Jane is most particularly interested in when sense 3 transitioned into sense 4 in particular.
– Tonepoet
Feb 10 '18 at 13:01
Hi KarlG. I don't really think this answer addresses the specific question being asked here. Are trying to imply that it was always acceptable, or if not, could you please try to give us a date of when it happened? I surmise that Jane is most particularly interested in when sense 3 transitioned into sense 4 in particular.
– Tonepoet
Feb 10 '18 at 13:01
The answer to the question "Has this always been the case, or what?" is not the same as asking when something happened, although that would be an interesting factoid, I suppose. On the other hand, the expression seems to have survived intact the demand for "mail carrier" vs. "postman" since the 1980s — most likely because it fills the lexical gap of second person plural outside of the South.
– KarlG
Feb 10 '18 at 16:04
The answer to the question "Has this always been the case, or what?" is not the same as asking when something happened, although that would be an interesting factoid, I suppose. On the other hand, the expression seems to have survived intact the demand for "mail carrier" vs. "postman" since the 1980s — most likely because it fills the lexical gap of second person plural outside of the South.
– KarlG
Feb 10 '18 at 16:04
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f430448%2fwhen-did-the-word-guys-become-popular-as-a-gender-neutral-word%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
It has not always been the case. It was originally an eponym for Guy Fawkes. Later, it was used to describe someone dressed up in an unsettling costume. By in the middle of the 19th century, it began to be used to refer to males. Sometime during the 20th century, it began to see use as a gender-neutral term, but only in the plural. You may remember "Hey you guys!" on the Electric Company. This article was the best I could find on the subject: slate.com/blogs/lexicon_valley/2016/02/10/…
– Christopher Issac
Feb 10 '18 at 8:39
1
First I would like to give a related link to a question, which regards if it is acceptable, however while doing so I would also like to note that this question asks when it became acceptable, which is a matter that is as of yet unaddressed in the other question, so I am also of the opinion that the related question is not a duplicate. I am mostly just doing this so we can sort which answers should go where properly.
– Tonepoet
Feb 10 '18 at 12:58
1. Is it really 'normal' ? 2. Is it really 'popular' ? 3. Is it really 'gender-neutral' ? 4. When did 'nowadays' start ? I think some facts are needed.
– Nigel J
Feb 10 '18 at 14:43
Some relevant background: What is a feminine version of guys?
– Mitch
Feb 10 '18 at 20:05