Pronunciation of the words “clothes” and “February” in American English
What is the correct pronunciation of the words "clothes" and "February" in the American English? A lot of people pronounce "clothes" as /kloʊz/, dropping the 'th', as for "February", I hear that the first 'r' is often dropped. Are these variants correct?
pronunciation north-american-english
|
show 2 more comments
What is the correct pronunciation of the words "clothes" and "February" in the American English? A lot of people pronounce "clothes" as /kloʊz/, dropping the 'th', as for "February", I hear that the first 'r' is often dropped. Are these variants correct?
pronunciation north-american-english
2
I doubt that one US citizen in ten would pronounce the "th" in "clothes" (beyond maybe a token effort). As to "February", I'd guess it's about 50/50, or maybe 60/40 in favor of dropping the first "r". (Though I favor keeping the "r".)
– Hot Licks
Apr 29 '15 at 17:37
2
In the USA it's /kloz/ and /'fɛbəwɛri/ (or /'fɛbwɛri/ in rapid speech). I've never heard a native speaker say /'fɛbruwɛri/, but I have heard /'fɛbɚwɛri/. The tense /o/ in clothes may be longer than usual for some speakers /klo:z/, but that's normal for any vowel preceding a voiced consonant like /z/.
– John Lawler
Apr 29 '15 at 17:49
2
In Britain one seldom, if ever, hears the first 'r' in February. I think it was only after I left secondary school that I discovered it contained a first r, and when I started work was embarrassed to find it wasn't spelled Febuary. But those speaking in the Received Pronunciation (possibly fewer than 5% of the popuIation) would show some sort of respect, however limited, for the 'th' in clothes.
– WS2
Apr 29 '15 at 17:51
1
It should be noted that in the US the R-less "February" may be pronounced (roughly) "feb-you-ary" or "feb-oo-ary". The latter is not easily distinguished from the R-full version when used in rapid speech. The former sticks out like a sore thumb.
– Hot Licks
Apr 29 '15 at 18:04
2
One should look in a dictionary. All three dictionaries I looked in list the pronunciations close /kloʊz/ and Febuary /fɛb(j)uɛri/ first, which usually means they're both more common and also not considered incorrect. But the pronunciations with 'th' and 'r' are also listed, and I would say those are considered correct as well.
– Peter Shor
Apr 29 '15 at 19:49
|
show 2 more comments
What is the correct pronunciation of the words "clothes" and "February" in the American English? A lot of people pronounce "clothes" as /kloʊz/, dropping the 'th', as for "February", I hear that the first 'r' is often dropped. Are these variants correct?
pronunciation north-american-english
What is the correct pronunciation of the words "clothes" and "February" in the American English? A lot of people pronounce "clothes" as /kloʊz/, dropping the 'th', as for "February", I hear that the first 'r' is often dropped. Are these variants correct?
pronunciation north-american-english
pronunciation north-american-english
asked Apr 29 '15 at 17:33
IrinaIrina
7717
7717
2
I doubt that one US citizen in ten would pronounce the "th" in "clothes" (beyond maybe a token effort). As to "February", I'd guess it's about 50/50, or maybe 60/40 in favor of dropping the first "r". (Though I favor keeping the "r".)
– Hot Licks
Apr 29 '15 at 17:37
2
In the USA it's /kloz/ and /'fɛbəwɛri/ (or /'fɛbwɛri/ in rapid speech). I've never heard a native speaker say /'fɛbruwɛri/, but I have heard /'fɛbɚwɛri/. The tense /o/ in clothes may be longer than usual for some speakers /klo:z/, but that's normal for any vowel preceding a voiced consonant like /z/.
– John Lawler
Apr 29 '15 at 17:49
2
In Britain one seldom, if ever, hears the first 'r' in February. I think it was only after I left secondary school that I discovered it contained a first r, and when I started work was embarrassed to find it wasn't spelled Febuary. But those speaking in the Received Pronunciation (possibly fewer than 5% of the popuIation) would show some sort of respect, however limited, for the 'th' in clothes.
– WS2
Apr 29 '15 at 17:51
1
It should be noted that in the US the R-less "February" may be pronounced (roughly) "feb-you-ary" or "feb-oo-ary". The latter is not easily distinguished from the R-full version when used in rapid speech. The former sticks out like a sore thumb.
– Hot Licks
Apr 29 '15 at 18:04
2
One should look in a dictionary. All three dictionaries I looked in list the pronunciations close /kloʊz/ and Febuary /fɛb(j)uɛri/ first, which usually means they're both more common and also not considered incorrect. But the pronunciations with 'th' and 'r' are also listed, and I would say those are considered correct as well.
– Peter Shor
Apr 29 '15 at 19:49
|
show 2 more comments
2
I doubt that one US citizen in ten would pronounce the "th" in "clothes" (beyond maybe a token effort). As to "February", I'd guess it's about 50/50, or maybe 60/40 in favor of dropping the first "r". (Though I favor keeping the "r".)
– Hot Licks
Apr 29 '15 at 17:37
2
In the USA it's /kloz/ and /'fɛbəwɛri/ (or /'fɛbwɛri/ in rapid speech). I've never heard a native speaker say /'fɛbruwɛri/, but I have heard /'fɛbɚwɛri/. The tense /o/ in clothes may be longer than usual for some speakers /klo:z/, but that's normal for any vowel preceding a voiced consonant like /z/.
– John Lawler
Apr 29 '15 at 17:49
2
In Britain one seldom, if ever, hears the first 'r' in February. I think it was only after I left secondary school that I discovered it contained a first r, and when I started work was embarrassed to find it wasn't spelled Febuary. But those speaking in the Received Pronunciation (possibly fewer than 5% of the popuIation) would show some sort of respect, however limited, for the 'th' in clothes.
– WS2
Apr 29 '15 at 17:51
1
It should be noted that in the US the R-less "February" may be pronounced (roughly) "feb-you-ary" or "feb-oo-ary". The latter is not easily distinguished from the R-full version when used in rapid speech. The former sticks out like a sore thumb.
– Hot Licks
Apr 29 '15 at 18:04
2
One should look in a dictionary. All three dictionaries I looked in list the pronunciations close /kloʊz/ and Febuary /fɛb(j)uɛri/ first, which usually means they're both more common and also not considered incorrect. But the pronunciations with 'th' and 'r' are also listed, and I would say those are considered correct as well.
– Peter Shor
Apr 29 '15 at 19:49
2
2
I doubt that one US citizen in ten would pronounce the "th" in "clothes" (beyond maybe a token effort). As to "February", I'd guess it's about 50/50, or maybe 60/40 in favor of dropping the first "r". (Though I favor keeping the "r".)
– Hot Licks
Apr 29 '15 at 17:37
I doubt that one US citizen in ten would pronounce the "th" in "clothes" (beyond maybe a token effort). As to "February", I'd guess it's about 50/50, or maybe 60/40 in favor of dropping the first "r". (Though I favor keeping the "r".)
– Hot Licks
Apr 29 '15 at 17:37
2
2
In the USA it's /kloz/ and /'fɛbəwɛri/ (or /'fɛbwɛri/ in rapid speech). I've never heard a native speaker say /'fɛbruwɛri/, but I have heard /'fɛbɚwɛri/. The tense /o/ in clothes may be longer than usual for some speakers /klo:z/, but that's normal for any vowel preceding a voiced consonant like /z/.
– John Lawler
Apr 29 '15 at 17:49
In the USA it's /kloz/ and /'fɛbəwɛri/ (or /'fɛbwɛri/ in rapid speech). I've never heard a native speaker say /'fɛbruwɛri/, but I have heard /'fɛbɚwɛri/. The tense /o/ in clothes may be longer than usual for some speakers /klo:z/, but that's normal for any vowel preceding a voiced consonant like /z/.
– John Lawler
Apr 29 '15 at 17:49
2
2
In Britain one seldom, if ever, hears the first 'r' in February. I think it was only after I left secondary school that I discovered it contained a first r, and when I started work was embarrassed to find it wasn't spelled Febuary. But those speaking in the Received Pronunciation (possibly fewer than 5% of the popuIation) would show some sort of respect, however limited, for the 'th' in clothes.
– WS2
Apr 29 '15 at 17:51
In Britain one seldom, if ever, hears the first 'r' in February. I think it was only after I left secondary school that I discovered it contained a first r, and when I started work was embarrassed to find it wasn't spelled Febuary. But those speaking in the Received Pronunciation (possibly fewer than 5% of the popuIation) would show some sort of respect, however limited, for the 'th' in clothes.
– WS2
Apr 29 '15 at 17:51
1
1
It should be noted that in the US the R-less "February" may be pronounced (roughly) "feb-you-ary" or "feb-oo-ary". The latter is not easily distinguished from the R-full version when used in rapid speech. The former sticks out like a sore thumb.
– Hot Licks
Apr 29 '15 at 18:04
It should be noted that in the US the R-less "February" may be pronounced (roughly) "feb-you-ary" or "feb-oo-ary". The latter is not easily distinguished from the R-full version when used in rapid speech. The former sticks out like a sore thumb.
– Hot Licks
Apr 29 '15 at 18:04
2
2
One should look in a dictionary. All three dictionaries I looked in list the pronunciations close /kloʊz/ and Febuary /fɛb(j)uɛri/ first, which usually means they're both more common and also not considered incorrect. But the pronunciations with 'th' and 'r' are also listed, and I would say those are considered correct as well.
– Peter Shor
Apr 29 '15 at 19:49
One should look in a dictionary. All three dictionaries I looked in list the pronunciations close /kloʊz/ and Febuary /fɛb(j)uɛri/ first, which usually means they're both more common and also not considered incorrect. But the pronunciations with 'th' and 'r' are also listed, and I would say those are considered correct as well.
– Peter Shor
Apr 29 '15 at 19:49
|
show 2 more comments
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
Often, I hear this in casual speech:
- Clothes turns into "close" (especially in a word like "clothespins")
- February turns into "feb-you-ary"
Close and Febuary. Exactly right from all I've ever said out here in hillbilly land.. I didn't even realize February had two R's until I was in my 30s. Misspelled it for years. Restaurant next one to get right without spellcheck. Restarant
– Dan Shaffer
Mar 11 '16 at 20:34
1
@Chenmunka the OP wanted to know if these variants were "correct" -- but what does that mean? Heard in the wild? Spoken by the Queen? Seemed to me he wanted to know whether people said things this way in real life. The answer, for better or worse, is "yes".
– Tom Hundt
Mar 14 '16 at 23:56
add a comment |
My dictionary allows no option at all, for dropping the first 'r' in February. However it does give the option to drop the 'th' in clothes. It just goes to show how diverse and flexible is American English.
I personally always at least try to give both of them their full pronunciations (they're tongue-twisters!), often wincing whenever I hear the more reckless versions.
But I refrain from over-reacting or lecturing anyone about it. I just take notice and file it away for future reference; not to hold it against anyone, but as a means of understanding people better.
Webster's New 20th C. Dictionary of the English Language, Unabridged, 2nd Ed. c.1959
add a comment |
I'm an American who is arguing on quota about "clothes". Being in the dictionary doesn't mean it's correct as much as it is just really common. Saying "close" instead of clothes is just lazy and calls to mind all the brain dead followers who say "literally" for emphasis when they are speaking figuratively. Just because a lot of people say it, doesnt make it correct. Loads of people say "17 year locusts" when in fact, they are cicadas which have no relation whatsoever to locusts other than they are both insects.
New contributor
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f242433%2fpronunciation-of-the-words-clothes-and-february-in-american-english%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Often, I hear this in casual speech:
- Clothes turns into "close" (especially in a word like "clothespins")
- February turns into "feb-you-ary"
Close and Febuary. Exactly right from all I've ever said out here in hillbilly land.. I didn't even realize February had two R's until I was in my 30s. Misspelled it for years. Restaurant next one to get right without spellcheck. Restarant
– Dan Shaffer
Mar 11 '16 at 20:34
1
@Chenmunka the OP wanted to know if these variants were "correct" -- but what does that mean? Heard in the wild? Spoken by the Queen? Seemed to me he wanted to know whether people said things this way in real life. The answer, for better or worse, is "yes".
– Tom Hundt
Mar 14 '16 at 23:56
add a comment |
Often, I hear this in casual speech:
- Clothes turns into "close" (especially in a word like "clothespins")
- February turns into "feb-you-ary"
Close and Febuary. Exactly right from all I've ever said out here in hillbilly land.. I didn't even realize February had two R's until I was in my 30s. Misspelled it for years. Restaurant next one to get right without spellcheck. Restarant
– Dan Shaffer
Mar 11 '16 at 20:34
1
@Chenmunka the OP wanted to know if these variants were "correct" -- but what does that mean? Heard in the wild? Spoken by the Queen? Seemed to me he wanted to know whether people said things this way in real life. The answer, for better or worse, is "yes".
– Tom Hundt
Mar 14 '16 at 23:56
add a comment |
Often, I hear this in casual speech:
- Clothes turns into "close" (especially in a word like "clothespins")
- February turns into "feb-you-ary"
Often, I hear this in casual speech:
- Clothes turns into "close" (especially in a word like "clothespins")
- February turns into "feb-you-ary"
answered Apr 29 '15 at 17:37
Tom HundtTom Hundt
37515
37515
Close and Febuary. Exactly right from all I've ever said out here in hillbilly land.. I didn't even realize February had two R's until I was in my 30s. Misspelled it for years. Restaurant next one to get right without spellcheck. Restarant
– Dan Shaffer
Mar 11 '16 at 20:34
1
@Chenmunka the OP wanted to know if these variants were "correct" -- but what does that mean? Heard in the wild? Spoken by the Queen? Seemed to me he wanted to know whether people said things this way in real life. The answer, for better or worse, is "yes".
– Tom Hundt
Mar 14 '16 at 23:56
add a comment |
Close and Febuary. Exactly right from all I've ever said out here in hillbilly land.. I didn't even realize February had two R's until I was in my 30s. Misspelled it for years. Restaurant next one to get right without spellcheck. Restarant
– Dan Shaffer
Mar 11 '16 at 20:34
1
@Chenmunka the OP wanted to know if these variants were "correct" -- but what does that mean? Heard in the wild? Spoken by the Queen? Seemed to me he wanted to know whether people said things this way in real life. The answer, for better or worse, is "yes".
– Tom Hundt
Mar 14 '16 at 23:56
Close and Febuary. Exactly right from all I've ever said out here in hillbilly land.. I didn't even realize February had two R's until I was in my 30s. Misspelled it for years. Restaurant next one to get right without spellcheck. Restarant
– Dan Shaffer
Mar 11 '16 at 20:34
Close and Febuary. Exactly right from all I've ever said out here in hillbilly land.. I didn't even realize February had two R's until I was in my 30s. Misspelled it for years. Restaurant next one to get right without spellcheck. Restarant
– Dan Shaffer
Mar 11 '16 at 20:34
1
1
@Chenmunka the OP wanted to know if these variants were "correct" -- but what does that mean? Heard in the wild? Spoken by the Queen? Seemed to me he wanted to know whether people said things this way in real life. The answer, for better or worse, is "yes".
– Tom Hundt
Mar 14 '16 at 23:56
@Chenmunka the OP wanted to know if these variants were "correct" -- but what does that mean? Heard in the wild? Spoken by the Queen? Seemed to me he wanted to know whether people said things this way in real life. The answer, for better or worse, is "yes".
– Tom Hundt
Mar 14 '16 at 23:56
add a comment |
My dictionary allows no option at all, for dropping the first 'r' in February. However it does give the option to drop the 'th' in clothes. It just goes to show how diverse and flexible is American English.
I personally always at least try to give both of them their full pronunciations (they're tongue-twisters!), often wincing whenever I hear the more reckless versions.
But I refrain from over-reacting or lecturing anyone about it. I just take notice and file it away for future reference; not to hold it against anyone, but as a means of understanding people better.
Webster's New 20th C. Dictionary of the English Language, Unabridged, 2nd Ed. c.1959
add a comment |
My dictionary allows no option at all, for dropping the first 'r' in February. However it does give the option to drop the 'th' in clothes. It just goes to show how diverse and flexible is American English.
I personally always at least try to give both of them their full pronunciations (they're tongue-twisters!), often wincing whenever I hear the more reckless versions.
But I refrain from over-reacting or lecturing anyone about it. I just take notice and file it away for future reference; not to hold it against anyone, but as a means of understanding people better.
Webster's New 20th C. Dictionary of the English Language, Unabridged, 2nd Ed. c.1959
add a comment |
My dictionary allows no option at all, for dropping the first 'r' in February. However it does give the option to drop the 'th' in clothes. It just goes to show how diverse and flexible is American English.
I personally always at least try to give both of them their full pronunciations (they're tongue-twisters!), often wincing whenever I hear the more reckless versions.
But I refrain from over-reacting or lecturing anyone about it. I just take notice and file it away for future reference; not to hold it against anyone, but as a means of understanding people better.
Webster's New 20th C. Dictionary of the English Language, Unabridged, 2nd Ed. c.1959
My dictionary allows no option at all, for dropping the first 'r' in February. However it does give the option to drop the 'th' in clothes. It just goes to show how diverse and flexible is American English.
I personally always at least try to give both of them their full pronunciations (they're tongue-twisters!), often wincing whenever I hear the more reckless versions.
But I refrain from over-reacting or lecturing anyone about it. I just take notice and file it away for future reference; not to hold it against anyone, but as a means of understanding people better.
Webster's New 20th C. Dictionary of the English Language, Unabridged, 2nd Ed. c.1959
answered Mar 6 '18 at 2:16
BreadBread
5,32521232
5,32521232
add a comment |
add a comment |
I'm an American who is arguing on quota about "clothes". Being in the dictionary doesn't mean it's correct as much as it is just really common. Saying "close" instead of clothes is just lazy and calls to mind all the brain dead followers who say "literally" for emphasis when they are speaking figuratively. Just because a lot of people say it, doesnt make it correct. Loads of people say "17 year locusts" when in fact, they are cicadas which have no relation whatsoever to locusts other than they are both insects.
New contributor
add a comment |
I'm an American who is arguing on quota about "clothes". Being in the dictionary doesn't mean it's correct as much as it is just really common. Saying "close" instead of clothes is just lazy and calls to mind all the brain dead followers who say "literally" for emphasis when they are speaking figuratively. Just because a lot of people say it, doesnt make it correct. Loads of people say "17 year locusts" when in fact, they are cicadas which have no relation whatsoever to locusts other than they are both insects.
New contributor
add a comment |
I'm an American who is arguing on quota about "clothes". Being in the dictionary doesn't mean it's correct as much as it is just really common. Saying "close" instead of clothes is just lazy and calls to mind all the brain dead followers who say "literally" for emphasis when they are speaking figuratively. Just because a lot of people say it, doesnt make it correct. Loads of people say "17 year locusts" when in fact, they are cicadas which have no relation whatsoever to locusts other than they are both insects.
New contributor
I'm an American who is arguing on quota about "clothes". Being in the dictionary doesn't mean it's correct as much as it is just really common. Saying "close" instead of clothes is just lazy and calls to mind all the brain dead followers who say "literally" for emphasis when they are speaking figuratively. Just because a lot of people say it, doesnt make it correct. Loads of people say "17 year locusts" when in fact, they are cicadas which have no relation whatsoever to locusts other than they are both insects.
New contributor
New contributor
answered 31 mins ago
Jim SterrettJim Sterrett
1
1
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f242433%2fpronunciation-of-the-words-clothes-and-february-in-american-english%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
I doubt that one US citizen in ten would pronounce the "th" in "clothes" (beyond maybe a token effort). As to "February", I'd guess it's about 50/50, or maybe 60/40 in favor of dropping the first "r". (Though I favor keeping the "r".)
– Hot Licks
Apr 29 '15 at 17:37
2
In the USA it's /kloz/ and /'fɛbəwɛri/ (or /'fɛbwɛri/ in rapid speech). I've never heard a native speaker say /'fɛbruwɛri/, but I have heard /'fɛbɚwɛri/. The tense /o/ in clothes may be longer than usual for some speakers /klo:z/, but that's normal for any vowel preceding a voiced consonant like /z/.
– John Lawler
Apr 29 '15 at 17:49
2
In Britain one seldom, if ever, hears the first 'r' in February. I think it was only after I left secondary school that I discovered it contained a first r, and when I started work was embarrassed to find it wasn't spelled Febuary. But those speaking in the Received Pronunciation (possibly fewer than 5% of the popuIation) would show some sort of respect, however limited, for the 'th' in clothes.
– WS2
Apr 29 '15 at 17:51
1
It should be noted that in the US the R-less "February" may be pronounced (roughly) "feb-you-ary" or "feb-oo-ary". The latter is not easily distinguished from the R-full version when used in rapid speech. The former sticks out like a sore thumb.
– Hot Licks
Apr 29 '15 at 18:04
2
One should look in a dictionary. All three dictionaries I looked in list the pronunciations close /kloʊz/ and Febuary /fɛb(j)uɛri/ first, which usually means they're both more common and also not considered incorrect. But the pronunciations with 'th' and 'r' are also listed, and I would say those are considered correct as well.
– Peter Shor
Apr 29 '15 at 19:49