Is “cogitate” used appropriately in “I cogitate that success relies on hard work”?
I have been thinking about other ways to say "I believe" in an essay and I came across "cogitate". Do you think it would be appropriate to use this word in an essay's conclusion? For instance, does this sound all right?
In conclusion, I cogitate that success solely relies on hard work.
word-usage word-choice
add a comment |
I have been thinking about other ways to say "I believe" in an essay and I came across "cogitate". Do you think it would be appropriate to use this word in an essay's conclusion? For instance, does this sound all right?
In conclusion, I cogitate that success solely relies on hard work.
word-usage word-choice
add a comment |
I have been thinking about other ways to say "I believe" in an essay and I came across "cogitate". Do you think it would be appropriate to use this word in an essay's conclusion? For instance, does this sound all right?
In conclusion, I cogitate that success solely relies on hard work.
word-usage word-choice
I have been thinking about other ways to say "I believe" in an essay and I came across "cogitate". Do you think it would be appropriate to use this word in an essay's conclusion? For instance, does this sound all right?
In conclusion, I cogitate that success solely relies on hard work.
word-usage word-choice
word-usage word-choice
edited 11 hours ago
200_success
7,45312240
7,45312240
asked yesterday
JustAnAmateurJustAnAmateur
374
374
add a comment |
add a comment |
9 Answers
9
active
oldest
votes
No, that sounds kind of pretentious and just wrong, as though you looked through a thesaurus to find a synonym. What is wrong with just using “believe”? You wouldn’t use “cogitate” exactly this way either. This word means “to meditate (on)”: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/cogitate - you would use this to describe thinking about something deeply and intently. Not to describe something you think or know to be true. “Cogitating” is more of an active process, and “believing” might be the result of “cogitating”. In any case the word “cogitate” is not very common, and does sound pretentious to me. “Meditate on” or “ponder” are preferable and more common (but still, none of these words are appropriate in this context).
add a comment |
Firstly, it's pretty rare to use cogitate at all. Using any word related to it, the most common is "cogitation", the action noun for the act of cogitating.
Second, think has two main senses in English. Most of us native speakers don't even necessarily realise it, but if we learn a language that has separate words for the two, like French, it kind of clicks. In French, there is penser, the active sense of think, where we might say think about, and croire, the stative sense of think, which is closely matched in sense to believe (though clearly with some difference).
Cogitate is a close match to penser, not to croire. It means the act of thinking, pondering, and so on. You might, if you wished to be pretentious, say:
Let me cogitate on that a minute.
You can't say what you want to say. It doesn't make sense.
5
French "penser" also has this double meaning though, sorry ("Je pense que ce n'est pas une très bonne analogie.")
– Aaron
16 hours ago
1
Interesting! My school French lessons stressed using the two distinctly, that there was only one correct in any situation. I suppose that avoids unfortunate and embarrassing misunderstandings when writing or speaking, but may lead to confusion when reading or listening!
– SamBC
15 hours ago
add a comment |
I agree with Mixolydian, "cogitate" sounds pretentious and doesn't fullfil exactly your intention.
I don't know where you have found that word but what about checking the Oxford Thesaurus?
Let me suggest some alternatives
In conclusion, I think that success solely relies on hard work.
In conclusion, I consider that success solely relies on hard work.
In conclusion, I'm of the opinion that success solely relies on hard work.
add a comment |
As Mixolydian states, cogitate is more about meditation or consideration of something. However, you could use it by rearranging your sentence a bit:
After some cogitation, I conclude that success solely relies on hard work.
This implies that the conclusion was reached after the cogitation.
New contributor
add a comment |
If you're looking to be the opposite of pretentious, you could say
I reckon that success solely relies on hard work.
New contributor
1
Colloquial but an accurate meaning.
– ohwilleke
yesterday
2
"Reckon" in this sense is common in British English but less so in the US. Americans tend to think of it as typically rural, which it definitely is not in the UK.
– Mark Foskey
yesterday
add a comment |
I think you are trying to suggest that your conclusion is based on some careful consideration. So you might try:
In conclusion, I determine (or have determined) that success solely relies on hard work.
From the OED.
Verb
Ascertain or establish exactly by research or calculation.
‘the inquest is entrusted with the task of determining the cause of death’
with clause ‘the point of our study was to determine what is true, not what is practicable’
New contributor
add a comment |
The word "cogitate" means to ponder on think about intently. A deliberate thought process whereas "believe" is relative to a matter of faith or speculation. Perhaps the phase "I speculate that" might be more appropriate.
New contributor
The verb speculate may work in some contexts, but I don't think it fits very well in the OP's specific example: In conclusion, I speculate that success solely relies on hard work. It might work better, though, in a context like this: We speculate that the success of our experiments could be replicated in a broader trial.
– J.R.♦
11 hours ago
add a comment |
In my native French language, the verb "cogiter" has specific meaning.
It is used when one experiences deep, chronical thoughts about a subject. It often refers to an unpleasant feeling, an obsessive thinking, which sticks to you for a relatively long period.
So when I read
In conclusion, I cogitate that success solely relies on hard work.
I get a weird feeling about your sentence's time consistency.
New contributor
We can even go back to the Latin root: cogito. As Descartes once said, 'cogito, ergo sum' - I think, therefore I am. In this sense it's more of a continuous action than an opinion.
– DaveMongoose
12 hours ago
add a comment |
In formal writing for essays I would avoid using "I think" or "I believe" or "in my opinion". If you are writing the essay, then it is understood to be your original thought and your beliefs or opinions. These phrases are just filler. Whatever you are saying before should lead to the logical conclusion that success relies solely on hard work. Even the phrase "in conclusion" looks like filler to me without context.
For example:
- This is my dog spot.
- Spot is a very hard worker.
- Spot became very successful after working hard for a long time.
- Spot sacrificed his free time to work.
- Spot's success is due solely to his hard work.
In this example, you can see how your fillers can be placed anywhere and not really change the meaning:
- This is my dog spot.
I believe he is a very hard worker.
In my opinion he became very successful...
I think he sacrificed a lot...
In conclusion, I believe that Spot's success is solely due to hard work.
When writing an essay, you should present facts and evidence, and let conclusions arise from the flow of the logic. If it's fiction, then you can write such a narrative but it would be odd to include yourself. Even if it's an opinion piece, then you would still avoid any kind of narrative, and instead present facts to support your own opinion, but not in a way that ties it to yourself.
New contributor
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "481"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f199521%2fis-cogitate-used-appropriately-in-i-cogitate-that-success-relies-on-hard-work%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
9 Answers
9
active
oldest
votes
9 Answers
9
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
No, that sounds kind of pretentious and just wrong, as though you looked through a thesaurus to find a synonym. What is wrong with just using “believe”? You wouldn’t use “cogitate” exactly this way either. This word means “to meditate (on)”: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/cogitate - you would use this to describe thinking about something deeply and intently. Not to describe something you think or know to be true. “Cogitating” is more of an active process, and “believing” might be the result of “cogitating”. In any case the word “cogitate” is not very common, and does sound pretentious to me. “Meditate on” or “ponder” are preferable and more common (but still, none of these words are appropriate in this context).
add a comment |
No, that sounds kind of pretentious and just wrong, as though you looked through a thesaurus to find a synonym. What is wrong with just using “believe”? You wouldn’t use “cogitate” exactly this way either. This word means “to meditate (on)”: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/cogitate - you would use this to describe thinking about something deeply and intently. Not to describe something you think or know to be true. “Cogitating” is more of an active process, and “believing” might be the result of “cogitating”. In any case the word “cogitate” is not very common, and does sound pretentious to me. “Meditate on” or “ponder” are preferable and more common (but still, none of these words are appropriate in this context).
add a comment |
No, that sounds kind of pretentious and just wrong, as though you looked through a thesaurus to find a synonym. What is wrong with just using “believe”? You wouldn’t use “cogitate” exactly this way either. This word means “to meditate (on)”: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/cogitate - you would use this to describe thinking about something deeply and intently. Not to describe something you think or know to be true. “Cogitating” is more of an active process, and “believing” might be the result of “cogitating”. In any case the word “cogitate” is not very common, and does sound pretentious to me. “Meditate on” or “ponder” are preferable and more common (but still, none of these words are appropriate in this context).
No, that sounds kind of pretentious and just wrong, as though you looked through a thesaurus to find a synonym. What is wrong with just using “believe”? You wouldn’t use “cogitate” exactly this way either. This word means “to meditate (on)”: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/cogitate - you would use this to describe thinking about something deeply and intently. Not to describe something you think or know to be true. “Cogitating” is more of an active process, and “believing” might be the result of “cogitating”. In any case the word “cogitate” is not very common, and does sound pretentious to me. “Meditate on” or “ponder” are preferable and more common (but still, none of these words are appropriate in this context).
answered yesterday
MixolydianMixolydian
2,246511
2,246511
add a comment |
add a comment |
Firstly, it's pretty rare to use cogitate at all. Using any word related to it, the most common is "cogitation", the action noun for the act of cogitating.
Second, think has two main senses in English. Most of us native speakers don't even necessarily realise it, but if we learn a language that has separate words for the two, like French, it kind of clicks. In French, there is penser, the active sense of think, where we might say think about, and croire, the stative sense of think, which is closely matched in sense to believe (though clearly with some difference).
Cogitate is a close match to penser, not to croire. It means the act of thinking, pondering, and so on. You might, if you wished to be pretentious, say:
Let me cogitate on that a minute.
You can't say what you want to say. It doesn't make sense.
5
French "penser" also has this double meaning though, sorry ("Je pense que ce n'est pas une très bonne analogie.")
– Aaron
16 hours ago
1
Interesting! My school French lessons stressed using the two distinctly, that there was only one correct in any situation. I suppose that avoids unfortunate and embarrassing misunderstandings when writing or speaking, but may lead to confusion when reading or listening!
– SamBC
15 hours ago
add a comment |
Firstly, it's pretty rare to use cogitate at all. Using any word related to it, the most common is "cogitation", the action noun for the act of cogitating.
Second, think has two main senses in English. Most of us native speakers don't even necessarily realise it, but if we learn a language that has separate words for the two, like French, it kind of clicks. In French, there is penser, the active sense of think, where we might say think about, and croire, the stative sense of think, which is closely matched in sense to believe (though clearly with some difference).
Cogitate is a close match to penser, not to croire. It means the act of thinking, pondering, and so on. You might, if you wished to be pretentious, say:
Let me cogitate on that a minute.
You can't say what you want to say. It doesn't make sense.
5
French "penser" also has this double meaning though, sorry ("Je pense que ce n'est pas une très bonne analogie.")
– Aaron
16 hours ago
1
Interesting! My school French lessons stressed using the two distinctly, that there was only one correct in any situation. I suppose that avoids unfortunate and embarrassing misunderstandings when writing or speaking, but may lead to confusion when reading or listening!
– SamBC
15 hours ago
add a comment |
Firstly, it's pretty rare to use cogitate at all. Using any word related to it, the most common is "cogitation", the action noun for the act of cogitating.
Second, think has two main senses in English. Most of us native speakers don't even necessarily realise it, but if we learn a language that has separate words for the two, like French, it kind of clicks. In French, there is penser, the active sense of think, where we might say think about, and croire, the stative sense of think, which is closely matched in sense to believe (though clearly with some difference).
Cogitate is a close match to penser, not to croire. It means the act of thinking, pondering, and so on. You might, if you wished to be pretentious, say:
Let me cogitate on that a minute.
You can't say what you want to say. It doesn't make sense.
Firstly, it's pretty rare to use cogitate at all. Using any word related to it, the most common is "cogitation", the action noun for the act of cogitating.
Second, think has two main senses in English. Most of us native speakers don't even necessarily realise it, but if we learn a language that has separate words for the two, like French, it kind of clicks. In French, there is penser, the active sense of think, where we might say think about, and croire, the stative sense of think, which is closely matched in sense to believe (though clearly with some difference).
Cogitate is a close match to penser, not to croire. It means the act of thinking, pondering, and so on. You might, if you wished to be pretentious, say:
Let me cogitate on that a minute.
You can't say what you want to say. It doesn't make sense.
edited 13 hours ago
answered yesterday
SamBCSamBC
9,5661235
9,5661235
5
French "penser" also has this double meaning though, sorry ("Je pense que ce n'est pas une très bonne analogie.")
– Aaron
16 hours ago
1
Interesting! My school French lessons stressed using the two distinctly, that there was only one correct in any situation. I suppose that avoids unfortunate and embarrassing misunderstandings when writing or speaking, but may lead to confusion when reading or listening!
– SamBC
15 hours ago
add a comment |
5
French "penser" also has this double meaning though, sorry ("Je pense que ce n'est pas une très bonne analogie.")
– Aaron
16 hours ago
1
Interesting! My school French lessons stressed using the two distinctly, that there was only one correct in any situation. I suppose that avoids unfortunate and embarrassing misunderstandings when writing or speaking, but may lead to confusion when reading or listening!
– SamBC
15 hours ago
5
5
French "penser" also has this double meaning though, sorry ("Je pense que ce n'est pas une très bonne analogie.")
– Aaron
16 hours ago
French "penser" also has this double meaning though, sorry ("Je pense que ce n'est pas une très bonne analogie.")
– Aaron
16 hours ago
1
1
Interesting! My school French lessons stressed using the two distinctly, that there was only one correct in any situation. I suppose that avoids unfortunate and embarrassing misunderstandings when writing or speaking, but may lead to confusion when reading or listening!
– SamBC
15 hours ago
Interesting! My school French lessons stressed using the two distinctly, that there was only one correct in any situation. I suppose that avoids unfortunate and embarrassing misunderstandings when writing or speaking, but may lead to confusion when reading or listening!
– SamBC
15 hours ago
add a comment |
I agree with Mixolydian, "cogitate" sounds pretentious and doesn't fullfil exactly your intention.
I don't know where you have found that word but what about checking the Oxford Thesaurus?
Let me suggest some alternatives
In conclusion, I think that success solely relies on hard work.
In conclusion, I consider that success solely relies on hard work.
In conclusion, I'm of the opinion that success solely relies on hard work.
add a comment |
I agree with Mixolydian, "cogitate" sounds pretentious and doesn't fullfil exactly your intention.
I don't know where you have found that word but what about checking the Oxford Thesaurus?
Let me suggest some alternatives
In conclusion, I think that success solely relies on hard work.
In conclusion, I consider that success solely relies on hard work.
In conclusion, I'm of the opinion that success solely relies on hard work.
add a comment |
I agree with Mixolydian, "cogitate" sounds pretentious and doesn't fullfil exactly your intention.
I don't know where you have found that word but what about checking the Oxford Thesaurus?
Let me suggest some alternatives
In conclusion, I think that success solely relies on hard work.
In conclusion, I consider that success solely relies on hard work.
In conclusion, I'm of the opinion that success solely relies on hard work.
I agree with Mixolydian, "cogitate" sounds pretentious and doesn't fullfil exactly your intention.
I don't know where you have found that word but what about checking the Oxford Thesaurus?
Let me suggest some alternatives
In conclusion, I think that success solely relies on hard work.
In conclusion, I consider that success solely relies on hard work.
In conclusion, I'm of the opinion that success solely relies on hard work.
answered yesterday
RubioRicRubioRic
5,08411134
5,08411134
add a comment |
add a comment |
As Mixolydian states, cogitate is more about meditation or consideration of something. However, you could use it by rearranging your sentence a bit:
After some cogitation, I conclude that success solely relies on hard work.
This implies that the conclusion was reached after the cogitation.
New contributor
add a comment |
As Mixolydian states, cogitate is more about meditation or consideration of something. However, you could use it by rearranging your sentence a bit:
After some cogitation, I conclude that success solely relies on hard work.
This implies that the conclusion was reached after the cogitation.
New contributor
add a comment |
As Mixolydian states, cogitate is more about meditation or consideration of something. However, you could use it by rearranging your sentence a bit:
After some cogitation, I conclude that success solely relies on hard work.
This implies that the conclusion was reached after the cogitation.
New contributor
As Mixolydian states, cogitate is more about meditation or consideration of something. However, you could use it by rearranging your sentence a bit:
After some cogitation, I conclude that success solely relies on hard work.
This implies that the conclusion was reached after the cogitation.
New contributor
New contributor
answered yesterday
seschneckseschneck
911
911
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
If you're looking to be the opposite of pretentious, you could say
I reckon that success solely relies on hard work.
New contributor
1
Colloquial but an accurate meaning.
– ohwilleke
yesterday
2
"Reckon" in this sense is common in British English but less so in the US. Americans tend to think of it as typically rural, which it definitely is not in the UK.
– Mark Foskey
yesterday
add a comment |
If you're looking to be the opposite of pretentious, you could say
I reckon that success solely relies on hard work.
New contributor
1
Colloquial but an accurate meaning.
– ohwilleke
yesterday
2
"Reckon" in this sense is common in British English but less so in the US. Americans tend to think of it as typically rural, which it definitely is not in the UK.
– Mark Foskey
yesterday
add a comment |
If you're looking to be the opposite of pretentious, you could say
I reckon that success solely relies on hard work.
New contributor
If you're looking to be the opposite of pretentious, you could say
I reckon that success solely relies on hard work.
New contributor
edited 16 hours ago
RubioRic
5,08411134
5,08411134
New contributor
answered yesterday
erhweqrhweherhweqrhweh
611
611
New contributor
New contributor
1
Colloquial but an accurate meaning.
– ohwilleke
yesterday
2
"Reckon" in this sense is common in British English but less so in the US. Americans tend to think of it as typically rural, which it definitely is not in the UK.
– Mark Foskey
yesterday
add a comment |
1
Colloquial but an accurate meaning.
– ohwilleke
yesterday
2
"Reckon" in this sense is common in British English but less so in the US. Americans tend to think of it as typically rural, which it definitely is not in the UK.
– Mark Foskey
yesterday
1
1
Colloquial but an accurate meaning.
– ohwilleke
yesterday
Colloquial but an accurate meaning.
– ohwilleke
yesterday
2
2
"Reckon" in this sense is common in British English but less so in the US. Americans tend to think of it as typically rural, which it definitely is not in the UK.
– Mark Foskey
yesterday
"Reckon" in this sense is common in British English but less so in the US. Americans tend to think of it as typically rural, which it definitely is not in the UK.
– Mark Foskey
yesterday
add a comment |
I think you are trying to suggest that your conclusion is based on some careful consideration. So you might try:
In conclusion, I determine (or have determined) that success solely relies on hard work.
From the OED.
Verb
Ascertain or establish exactly by research or calculation.
‘the inquest is entrusted with the task of determining the cause of death’
with clause ‘the point of our study was to determine what is true, not what is practicable’
New contributor
add a comment |
I think you are trying to suggest that your conclusion is based on some careful consideration. So you might try:
In conclusion, I determine (or have determined) that success solely relies on hard work.
From the OED.
Verb
Ascertain or establish exactly by research or calculation.
‘the inquest is entrusted with the task of determining the cause of death’
with clause ‘the point of our study was to determine what is true, not what is practicable’
New contributor
add a comment |
I think you are trying to suggest that your conclusion is based on some careful consideration. So you might try:
In conclusion, I determine (or have determined) that success solely relies on hard work.
From the OED.
Verb
Ascertain or establish exactly by research or calculation.
‘the inquest is entrusted with the task of determining the cause of death’
with clause ‘the point of our study was to determine what is true, not what is practicable’
New contributor
I think you are trying to suggest that your conclusion is based on some careful consideration. So you might try:
In conclusion, I determine (or have determined) that success solely relies on hard work.
From the OED.
Verb
Ascertain or establish exactly by research or calculation.
‘the inquest is entrusted with the task of determining the cause of death’
with clause ‘the point of our study was to determine what is true, not what is practicable’
New contributor
New contributor
answered yesterday
Mbo42Mbo42
212
212
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
The word "cogitate" means to ponder on think about intently. A deliberate thought process whereas "believe" is relative to a matter of faith or speculation. Perhaps the phase "I speculate that" might be more appropriate.
New contributor
The verb speculate may work in some contexts, but I don't think it fits very well in the OP's specific example: In conclusion, I speculate that success solely relies on hard work. It might work better, though, in a context like this: We speculate that the success of our experiments could be replicated in a broader trial.
– J.R.♦
11 hours ago
add a comment |
The word "cogitate" means to ponder on think about intently. A deliberate thought process whereas "believe" is relative to a matter of faith or speculation. Perhaps the phase "I speculate that" might be more appropriate.
New contributor
The verb speculate may work in some contexts, but I don't think it fits very well in the OP's specific example: In conclusion, I speculate that success solely relies on hard work. It might work better, though, in a context like this: We speculate that the success of our experiments could be replicated in a broader trial.
– J.R.♦
11 hours ago
add a comment |
The word "cogitate" means to ponder on think about intently. A deliberate thought process whereas "believe" is relative to a matter of faith or speculation. Perhaps the phase "I speculate that" might be more appropriate.
New contributor
The word "cogitate" means to ponder on think about intently. A deliberate thought process whereas "believe" is relative to a matter of faith or speculation. Perhaps the phase "I speculate that" might be more appropriate.
New contributor
edited 11 hours ago
J.R.♦
99.1k8127245
99.1k8127245
New contributor
answered 22 hours ago
Old_FossilOld_Fossil
1111
1111
New contributor
New contributor
The verb speculate may work in some contexts, but I don't think it fits very well in the OP's specific example: In conclusion, I speculate that success solely relies on hard work. It might work better, though, in a context like this: We speculate that the success of our experiments could be replicated in a broader trial.
– J.R.♦
11 hours ago
add a comment |
The verb speculate may work in some contexts, but I don't think it fits very well in the OP's specific example: In conclusion, I speculate that success solely relies on hard work. It might work better, though, in a context like this: We speculate that the success of our experiments could be replicated in a broader trial.
– J.R.♦
11 hours ago
The verb speculate may work in some contexts, but I don't think it fits very well in the OP's specific example: In conclusion, I speculate that success solely relies on hard work. It might work better, though, in a context like this: We speculate that the success of our experiments could be replicated in a broader trial.
– J.R.♦
11 hours ago
The verb speculate may work in some contexts, but I don't think it fits very well in the OP's specific example: In conclusion, I speculate that success solely relies on hard work. It might work better, though, in a context like this: We speculate that the success of our experiments could be replicated in a broader trial.
– J.R.♦
11 hours ago
add a comment |
In my native French language, the verb "cogiter" has specific meaning.
It is used when one experiences deep, chronical thoughts about a subject. It often refers to an unpleasant feeling, an obsessive thinking, which sticks to you for a relatively long period.
So when I read
In conclusion, I cogitate that success solely relies on hard work.
I get a weird feeling about your sentence's time consistency.
New contributor
We can even go back to the Latin root: cogito. As Descartes once said, 'cogito, ergo sum' - I think, therefore I am. In this sense it's more of a continuous action than an opinion.
– DaveMongoose
12 hours ago
add a comment |
In my native French language, the verb "cogiter" has specific meaning.
It is used when one experiences deep, chronical thoughts about a subject. It often refers to an unpleasant feeling, an obsessive thinking, which sticks to you for a relatively long period.
So when I read
In conclusion, I cogitate that success solely relies on hard work.
I get a weird feeling about your sentence's time consistency.
New contributor
We can even go back to the Latin root: cogito. As Descartes once said, 'cogito, ergo sum' - I think, therefore I am. In this sense it's more of a continuous action than an opinion.
– DaveMongoose
12 hours ago
add a comment |
In my native French language, the verb "cogiter" has specific meaning.
It is used when one experiences deep, chronical thoughts about a subject. It often refers to an unpleasant feeling, an obsessive thinking, which sticks to you for a relatively long period.
So when I read
In conclusion, I cogitate that success solely relies on hard work.
I get a weird feeling about your sentence's time consistency.
New contributor
In my native French language, the verb "cogiter" has specific meaning.
It is used when one experiences deep, chronical thoughts about a subject. It often refers to an unpleasant feeling, an obsessive thinking, which sticks to you for a relatively long period.
So when I read
In conclusion, I cogitate that success solely relies on hard work.
I get a weird feeling about your sentence's time consistency.
New contributor
edited 11 hours ago
J.R.♦
99.1k8127245
99.1k8127245
New contributor
answered 18 hours ago
Pierre SaillardPierre Saillard
11
11
New contributor
New contributor
We can even go back to the Latin root: cogito. As Descartes once said, 'cogito, ergo sum' - I think, therefore I am. In this sense it's more of a continuous action than an opinion.
– DaveMongoose
12 hours ago
add a comment |
We can even go back to the Latin root: cogito. As Descartes once said, 'cogito, ergo sum' - I think, therefore I am. In this sense it's more of a continuous action than an opinion.
– DaveMongoose
12 hours ago
We can even go back to the Latin root: cogito. As Descartes once said, 'cogito, ergo sum' - I think, therefore I am. In this sense it's more of a continuous action than an opinion.
– DaveMongoose
12 hours ago
We can even go back to the Latin root: cogito. As Descartes once said, 'cogito, ergo sum' - I think, therefore I am. In this sense it's more of a continuous action than an opinion.
– DaveMongoose
12 hours ago
add a comment |
In formal writing for essays I would avoid using "I think" or "I believe" or "in my opinion". If you are writing the essay, then it is understood to be your original thought and your beliefs or opinions. These phrases are just filler. Whatever you are saying before should lead to the logical conclusion that success relies solely on hard work. Even the phrase "in conclusion" looks like filler to me without context.
For example:
- This is my dog spot.
- Spot is a very hard worker.
- Spot became very successful after working hard for a long time.
- Spot sacrificed his free time to work.
- Spot's success is due solely to his hard work.
In this example, you can see how your fillers can be placed anywhere and not really change the meaning:
- This is my dog spot.
I believe he is a very hard worker.
In my opinion he became very successful...
I think he sacrificed a lot...
In conclusion, I believe that Spot's success is solely due to hard work.
When writing an essay, you should present facts and evidence, and let conclusions arise from the flow of the logic. If it's fiction, then you can write such a narrative but it would be odd to include yourself. Even if it's an opinion piece, then you would still avoid any kind of narrative, and instead present facts to support your own opinion, but not in a way that ties it to yourself.
New contributor
add a comment |
In formal writing for essays I would avoid using "I think" or "I believe" or "in my opinion". If you are writing the essay, then it is understood to be your original thought and your beliefs or opinions. These phrases are just filler. Whatever you are saying before should lead to the logical conclusion that success relies solely on hard work. Even the phrase "in conclusion" looks like filler to me without context.
For example:
- This is my dog spot.
- Spot is a very hard worker.
- Spot became very successful after working hard for a long time.
- Spot sacrificed his free time to work.
- Spot's success is due solely to his hard work.
In this example, you can see how your fillers can be placed anywhere and not really change the meaning:
- This is my dog spot.
I believe he is a very hard worker.
In my opinion he became very successful...
I think he sacrificed a lot...
In conclusion, I believe that Spot's success is solely due to hard work.
When writing an essay, you should present facts and evidence, and let conclusions arise from the flow of the logic. If it's fiction, then you can write such a narrative but it would be odd to include yourself. Even if it's an opinion piece, then you would still avoid any kind of narrative, and instead present facts to support your own opinion, but not in a way that ties it to yourself.
New contributor
add a comment |
In formal writing for essays I would avoid using "I think" or "I believe" or "in my opinion". If you are writing the essay, then it is understood to be your original thought and your beliefs or opinions. These phrases are just filler. Whatever you are saying before should lead to the logical conclusion that success relies solely on hard work. Even the phrase "in conclusion" looks like filler to me without context.
For example:
- This is my dog spot.
- Spot is a very hard worker.
- Spot became very successful after working hard for a long time.
- Spot sacrificed his free time to work.
- Spot's success is due solely to his hard work.
In this example, you can see how your fillers can be placed anywhere and not really change the meaning:
- This is my dog spot.
I believe he is a very hard worker.
In my opinion he became very successful...
I think he sacrificed a lot...
In conclusion, I believe that Spot's success is solely due to hard work.
When writing an essay, you should present facts and evidence, and let conclusions arise from the flow of the logic. If it's fiction, then you can write such a narrative but it would be odd to include yourself. Even if it's an opinion piece, then you would still avoid any kind of narrative, and instead present facts to support your own opinion, but not in a way that ties it to yourself.
New contributor
In formal writing for essays I would avoid using "I think" or "I believe" or "in my opinion". If you are writing the essay, then it is understood to be your original thought and your beliefs or opinions. These phrases are just filler. Whatever you are saying before should lead to the logical conclusion that success relies solely on hard work. Even the phrase "in conclusion" looks like filler to me without context.
For example:
- This is my dog spot.
- Spot is a very hard worker.
- Spot became very successful after working hard for a long time.
- Spot sacrificed his free time to work.
- Spot's success is due solely to his hard work.
In this example, you can see how your fillers can be placed anywhere and not really change the meaning:
- This is my dog spot.
I believe he is a very hard worker.
In my opinion he became very successful...
I think he sacrificed a lot...
In conclusion, I believe that Spot's success is solely due to hard work.
When writing an essay, you should present facts and evidence, and let conclusions arise from the flow of the logic. If it's fiction, then you can write such a narrative but it would be odd to include yourself. Even if it's an opinion piece, then you would still avoid any kind of narrative, and instead present facts to support your own opinion, but not in a way that ties it to yourself.
New contributor
New contributor
answered 8 hours ago
jreesejreese
11
11
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language Learners Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f199521%2fis-cogitate-used-appropriately-in-i-cogitate-that-success-relies-on-hard-work%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown