Assassin's bullet with mercury
$begingroup$
This is something I have been wondering: if an assassin wanted to kill their target with a bullet from a sniper rifle, can they dip it in liquid mercury so even if the bullet itself doesn't kill them, the mercury poisoning will? I am looking for scientific basis on how it could be feasible, if it is at all.
And in case you're wondering: No, I'm not planning to assassinate somebody.
science-based chemistry assassination
asked Apr 3 at 17:31
Nathan HoppNathan Hopp
3541313
$endgroup$
|
show 9 more comments
$begingroup$
This is something I have been wondering: if an assassin wanted to kill their target with a bullet from a sniper rifle, can they dip it in liquid mercury so even if the bullet itself doesn't kill them, the mercury poisoning will? I am looking for scientific basis on how it could be feasible, if it is at all.
And in case you're wondering: No, I'm not planning to assassinate somebody.
science-based chemistry assassination
asked Apr 3 at 17:31
Nathan HoppNathan Hopp
3541313
$endgroup$
64
$begingroup$
Yay, we just got moved up the FBI, CIA, etc. watchlists again.
$endgroup$
– Gryphon
Apr 3 at 17:34
7
$begingroup$
quora.com/Will-adding-mercury-to-bullets-increase-the-fatality
$endgroup$
– nzaman
Apr 3 at 17:35
7
$begingroup$
Mercury bullets are stupid. Turns out though, that sodium and potassium bullets are awesome: youtube.com/watch?v=T85d7ST2yxU
$endgroup$
– Starfish Prime
Apr 3 at 18:49
6
$begingroup$
As many have indicated, no. Mercury is actually a slow killer. Have you ever heard the phrase, "mad as a hatter?" It came from the 1700s when hat makers in Europe used mercury during the hat making process and long-term exposure made people bonkers - and sometimes killed them. But it takes regular exposure for a long time to do that. Fish are harvested with mercury in them - alive, not dead. Mercury poisoning is a problem, but the environmental hype exceeds Mercury's abilities. Now, a hollow-tip like Zeiss suggests with a Curare core.... That would work.
$endgroup$
– JBH
Apr 3 at 20:17
8
$begingroup$
@Sievert The lethality to whichever poor sod has to load the things, yes.
$endgroup$
– Cadence
Apr 3 at 20:58
|
show 9 more comments
$begingroup$
This is something I have been wondering: if an assassin wanted to kill their target with a bullet from a sniper rifle, can they dip it in liquid mercury so even if the bullet itself doesn't kill them, the mercury poisoning will? I am looking for scientific basis on how it could be feasible, if it is at all.
And in case you're wondering: No, I'm not planning to assassinate somebody.
science-based chemistry assassination
asked Apr 3 at 17:31
Nathan HoppNathan Hopp
3541313
$endgroup$
This is something I have been wondering: if an assassin wanted to kill their target with a bullet from a sniper rifle, can they dip it in liquid mercury so even if the bullet itself doesn't kill them, the mercury poisoning will? I am looking for scientific basis on how it could be feasible, if it is at all.
And in case you're wondering: No, I'm not planning to assassinate somebody.
science-based chemistry assassination
science-based chemistry assassination
asked Apr 3 at 17:31
Nathan HoppNathan Hopp
3541313
asked Apr 3 at 17:31
Nathan HoppNathan Hopp
3541313
asked Apr 3 at 17:31
Nathan HoppNathan Hopp
3541313
asked Apr 3 at 17:31
Nathan HoppNathan Hopp
3541313
asked Apr 3 at 17:31
Nathan HoppNathan Hopp
3541313
3541313
64
$begingroup$
Yay, we just got moved up the FBI, CIA, etc. watchlists again.
$endgroup$
– Gryphon
Apr 3 at 17:34
7
$begingroup$
quora.com/Will-adding-mercury-to-bullets-increase-the-fatality
$endgroup$
– nzaman
Apr 3 at 17:35
7
$begingroup$
Mercury bullets are stupid. Turns out though, that sodium and potassium bullets are awesome: youtube.com/watch?v=T85d7ST2yxU
$endgroup$
– Starfish Prime
Apr 3 at 18:49
6
$begingroup$
As many have indicated, no. Mercury is actually a slow killer. Have you ever heard the phrase, "mad as a hatter?" It came from the 1700s when hat makers in Europe used mercury during the hat making process and long-term exposure made people bonkers - and sometimes killed them. But it takes regular exposure for a long time to do that. Fish are harvested with mercury in them - alive, not dead. Mercury poisoning is a problem, but the environmental hype exceeds Mercury's abilities. Now, a hollow-tip like Zeiss suggests with a Curare core.... That would work.
$endgroup$
– JBH
Apr 3 at 20:17
8
$begingroup$
@Sievert The lethality to whichever poor sod has to load the things, yes.
$endgroup$
– Cadence
Apr 3 at 20:58
|
show 9 more comments
64
$begingroup$
Yay, we just got moved up the FBI, CIA, etc. watchlists again.
$endgroup$
– Gryphon
Apr 3 at 17:34
7
$begingroup$
quora.com/Will-adding-mercury-to-bullets-increase-the-fatality
$endgroup$
– nzaman
Apr 3 at 17:35
7
$begingroup$
Mercury bullets are stupid. Turns out though, that sodium and potassium bullets are awesome: youtube.com/watch?v=T85d7ST2yxU
$endgroup$
– Starfish Prime
Apr 3 at 18:49
6
$begingroup$
As many have indicated, no. Mercury is actually a slow killer. Have you ever heard the phrase, "mad as a hatter?" It came from the 1700s when hat makers in Europe used mercury during the hat making process and long-term exposure made people bonkers - and sometimes killed them. But it takes regular exposure for a long time to do that. Fish are harvested with mercury in them - alive, not dead. Mercury poisoning is a problem, but the environmental hype exceeds Mercury's abilities. Now, a hollow-tip like Zeiss suggests with a Curare core.... That would work.
$endgroup$
– JBH
Apr 3 at 20:17
8
$begingroup$
@Sievert The lethality to whichever poor sod has to load the things, yes.
$endgroup$
– Cadence
Apr 3 at 20:58
64
64
$begingroup$
Yay, we just got moved up the FBI, CIA, etc. watchlists again.
$endgroup$
– Gryphon
Apr 3 at 17:34
$begingroup$
Yay, we just got moved up the FBI, CIA, etc. watchlists again.
$endgroup$
– Gryphon
Apr 3 at 17:34
7
7
$begingroup$
quora.com/Will-adding-mercury-to-bullets-increase-the-fatality
$endgroup$
– nzaman
Apr 3 at 17:35
$begingroup$
quora.com/Will-adding-mercury-to-bullets-increase-the-fatality
$endgroup$
– nzaman
Apr 3 at 17:35
7
7
$begingroup$
Mercury bullets are stupid. Turns out though, that sodium and potassium bullets are awesome: youtube.com/watch?v=T85d7ST2yxU
$endgroup$
– Starfish Prime
Apr 3 at 18:49
$begingroup$
Mercury bullets are stupid. Turns out though, that sodium and potassium bullets are awesome: youtube.com/watch?v=T85d7ST2yxU
$endgroup$
– Starfish Prime
Apr 3 at 18:49
6
6
$begingroup$
As many have indicated, no. Mercury is actually a slow killer. Have you ever heard the phrase, "mad as a hatter?" It came from the 1700s when hat makers in Europe used mercury during the hat making process and long-term exposure made people bonkers - and sometimes killed them. But it takes regular exposure for a long time to do that. Fish are harvested with mercury in them - alive, not dead. Mercury poisoning is a problem, but the environmental hype exceeds Mercury's abilities. Now, a hollow-tip like Zeiss suggests with a Curare core.... That would work.
$endgroup$
– JBH
Apr 3 at 20:17
$begingroup$
As many have indicated, no. Mercury is actually a slow killer. Have you ever heard the phrase, "mad as a hatter?" It came from the 1700s when hat makers in Europe used mercury during the hat making process and long-term exposure made people bonkers - and sometimes killed them. But it takes regular exposure for a long time to do that. Fish are harvested with mercury in them - alive, not dead. Mercury poisoning is a problem, but the environmental hype exceeds Mercury's abilities. Now, a hollow-tip like Zeiss suggests with a Curare core.... That would work.
$endgroup$
– JBH
Apr 3 at 20:17
8
8
$begingroup$
@Sievert The lethality to whichever poor sod has to load the things, yes.
$endgroup$
– Cadence
Apr 3 at 20:58
$begingroup$
@Sievert The lethality to whichever poor sod has to load the things, yes.
$endgroup$
– Cadence
Apr 3 at 20:58
|
show 9 more comments
9 Answers
9
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
No.
If we just dip the bullet in mercury, only trace amounts of mercury will remain. That definitely won't be enough mercury for our purposes.
If we treat a lead (but not iron/steel) bullet for a long time in mercury it will form an amalgam alloy. This can give us sufficient amount of mercury, but adversely affect bullet ballistics. Additionally, an amalgam alloy bullet will likely be removed by subsequent surgery, again, negating our efforts.
If we instead enclose mercury in a hollow bullet, that might work - but it would still be messy and much less effective than cyanide, for example.
answered Apr 3 at 17:46
AlexanderAlexander
21.9k53586
$endgroup$
16
$begingroup$
I've had amalgam tooth fillings. I'm still alive.
$endgroup$
– Mazura
2 days ago
25
$begingroup$
Still alive now, but if someone fires an amalgam filling at you with a sniper rifle it might be bad for your health...
$endgroup$
– Penguino
2 days ago
7
$begingroup$
Ah, so Cyanide Gushers™ Bullets are the answer. Got it.
$endgroup$
– Broots Waymb
2 days ago
2
$begingroup$
@Penguinoif someone fires an amalgam filling at you with a sniper rifle it might be bad for your healthProbalby not. The ballistic trajectory and MoA (Minute of Angle) of an amalgam filling makes it pretty unlikely the shooter would actually be able to hit you with it, unless fired at point blank range.... which would raise questions of who would use a sniper rifle to take a point-blank shot.
$endgroup$
– HopelessN00b
yesterday
5
$begingroup$
@HopelessN00b Someone who suddenly realised their target is a lot closer than anticipated, perhaps?
$endgroup$
– Clonkex
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Mercury has, in the real world, been used to increase the terminal effect of hollow point bullets (especially a the relatively low velocity of pistol bullets). In essence, a short time before firing (so as not to have all the mercury amalgamated with the lead, but some liquid still left at firing) a conventional hollow point is filled with mercury. It was common to press a small caliber gas check (a soft metal disk of precise diameter, with a raised edge) into the hollow point to keep the mercury in place.
On impact, the liquid in the hollow point magnified the hydraulic effect, leading to much stronger and faster expansion of the bullet. The mercury itself was chemically insignificant; it was the expansion effect that was sought. Worth noting here that my source (an article in a gun/reloading publication, but I don't recall which, much less what 1970s vintage issue) also found that the effect was essentially the same using water or oil; any difference between mercury and water being attributable to the greater increase in bullet weight.
Most who use guns for defense now consider penetration more important than expansion, so mercury tip bullets (which have long been legally prohibited as "toxic", however erroneously) are no longer widely considered an effective modification.
edited Apr 3 at 19:18
Brythan
20.9k74286
answered Apr 3 at 18:00
Zeiss IkonZeiss Ikon
2,484117
$endgroup$
9
$begingroup$
Citation needed. I'm pretty certain it has always been a fictional device, with no practical real world implementation. Mercury tipped bullets will, at best, be no better than the normal kind.
$endgroup$
– Starfish Prime
Apr 3 at 18:31
4
$begingroup$
Can't give a citation. I read about this in a gun/reloading source, an article with a "mythbusting" attitude, which showed that yes, there was a definite effect of increasing expansion -- but it was in the 1970s, when hollow points were the rage and those who advocated penetration were largely ignored, at least in the press, and after forty-some years, I don't recall the source. The same article, as I recall, showed that the same effect was obtainable without legal issues using vegetable oil or plain water.
$endgroup$
– Zeiss Ikon
Apr 3 at 18:37
3
$begingroup$
I did find a video of an NaK-filled bullet being used. The alloy is liquid at room temperature. It was shot at very close range (probably a necessity to ensure it actually reached the target) and doesn't appear to be noticably better at expansion than potassium which is merely very soft. Note that in all the cases, the bullet isn't "tipped" so much as the jacket being completely emptied of lead and refilled.
$endgroup$
– Starfish Prime
Apr 3 at 18:58
3
$begingroup$
NaK is so light this isn't a good comparison. Lead is many times denser,and mercury a bit denser than that.
$endgroup$
– Zeiss Ikon
Apr 3 at 19:07
9
$begingroup$
I suspect the "toxic" designation for the bullet is not so much referring to the effect of the mercury on the target (who generally has more important bullet wound trauma to deal with), but to the effect on the environment around them when the bullet exits their body (or when a bullet hits something else, in the case of a missed shot). It would be a pain to clean up bits of mercury scattered all over the area, and dangerous to the cleaning personnel.
$endgroup$
– Blckknght
Apr 3 at 21:14
|
show 5 more comments
$begingroup$
While the answer to the question is not a hard no, there are way better options for the same effect.
If your goal is death by "heavy metal poisoning", then I'd suggest depleted uranium rounds instead. Uranium is far more toxic than mercury, plus comes with some impressive armor penetrating properties as an added bonus. DU rounds also have a tendency to liquify/vaporize on impact so even though it's solid at rest, it can still splatter on impact fatally infecting the wounded person's bloodstream, but as David pointed out, getting them to splatter against soft tissue is unlikely.
Either way, heavy metal poisoning is a slow death which is probably not what an assassin wants on a near miss. A better approach would probably be a low-caliber explosive round. While they violate all sorts of international laws and treaties, an explosive rifle round to the arm, leg, or gut would still cause enough mutilation that your target is likely to quickly bleed out and die.
If you really want to be inhuman, combine the ideas by making a sodium/potassium round with a DU jacket. If the blast does not kill you, the DU shrapnel will, and if that fails, the blast will still vaporize a lethal dose of uranium into your bloodstream.
answered Apr 3 at 22:01
NosajimikiNosajimiki
2,460119
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
DU rounds from A10's were used for anti personnel operations during Iraq 1/Desert Storm. Rumor says that the effect was roughly the same as a giant sausage grinder going through the camps. You might call that heavy metal poisoning, but not in the strictly chemical sense of the word.
$endgroup$
– pojo-guy
yesterday
1
$begingroup$
Actually, DU is not useful for this. There are veterans with DU shrapnel still walking around years afterwards (ditton with lead bullets - toxic, not absorbed via that route) . DU dust or vapour is much, much more toxic.
$endgroup$
– David Hambling
yesterday
1
$begingroup$
DU has a tendency to vaporize when hitting armor. Not when hitting a person.
$endgroup$
– Loren Pechtel
21 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
No.
Not even in the form of dimethylmercury.
This extremely nasty organic compound was being carefully used by professional toxic metal researcher Karen Wetterhahn when a few small drops of it touched the outside of her latex gloves. At the time it was not known that this noxious substance could travel through latex. Nothing could be done, she died less than a year later.
To make enough stick to a (hot - >100 celsius) bullet in flight, because it would otherwise evaporate before reaching your target, dipping the bullet would not work, you'd need some water soluble delivery system which releases after impact which would not satisfy the requirements of the question - but careful how your protagonist uses it, lest they succumb the same way.
Edited due to being wrong all over.
answered Apr 3 at 17:57
AgrajagAgrajag
7,11411550
$endgroup$
6
$begingroup$
How hot do bullets get when fired?. TL;DR: at least 100 degrees Celsius, above the boiling point of dimethylmercury.
$endgroup$
– Brythan
Apr 3 at 19:17
3
$begingroup$
I guess you could drill a hole in the end of the bullet, fill it with the noxious substance and then plug it with something like epoxy. A few tests with dye and ballistic gel would confirm whether it's effective or not.
$endgroup$
– Spehro Pefhany
Apr 3 at 20:13
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Mercury as a LD50 of between 1mg/kg to 100 mg/kg. depending on the chemical properties of the mercury you choose to use you may need up to 10g to make if potentially lethal. Assuming you use the most soluble form of mercury, you would still want to up the dose significantly to overcome elements such as splatter, bullet passing through entirely or just not absorbed by the body. This would add significantly to the weight of the bullet and may mess with its ballistics.
If you choose another element, such as polonium or plutonium, you may have better success. Both are highly toxic due to chemical toxicity and radiological toxicity. I'm not entirely sure of the chemical properties of polonium, but plutonium is a dense metal, similar to uranium. It can easily be made into a bullet that shoots properly, similar to depleted uranium. You would only need 5mg to be chemically toxic. If you have a 7.5g mixed metal plutonium round, it would ensure poisoning of the target. However, that death by heavy metal poisoning would take a long while to occur, depending on the amount of metal the body absorbed prior to the bullets removal.
answered Apr 3 at 22:46
SonvarSonvar
7947
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
I'm pretty sure the atomic regulatory agency in whatever jurisdiction our assassin lives would get very interested if they set out to acquire any amount of plutonium, even milligrams.
$endgroup$
– Blckknght
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Great thing about plutonium is it tends to be a waste product in LEU reactors, (Pu-238 and 240 are readily produced and is effectively useless for further fissions.) Now if you find a location that has lax controls on their spent fuel waste, then it would be fairly easy to acquire.
$endgroup$
– Sonvar
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
No, because you need more Mercury than the fatal dose that can be delivered in a bullet. Adding the Mercury sure will make your victim uncomfortable until the body sheds the excess amount down to acceptable levels.
Mercury when ingested targets blood, kidneys, central nervous system, liver and the brain. Large doses of Mercury will lead to easily identifiable health symptoms Administration of a chelating agent can help reduce the effects on the body.
Acute Mercury poisoning will lead to death, but generally that death will be due to an already existing kidney or liver damage. There is always the possibility that exposure will cause a failure of the central nervous system, which could lead to death.
In essence, that big new hole in the body from he gunshot wound will be far more fatal either from tissue damage or a secondary infection.
- https://fscimage.fishersci.com/msds/96252.htm
answered Apr 3 at 18:02
gwallygwally
3,526814
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Metallic mercury doesn't form soluble compounds easily. if the mercury isn't already in an organic compound form, it's not noticeably worse than lead -- and contrary to popular fiction, bullets are usually left in the body, because removing them will do more harm than leaving them will.
$endgroup$
– Zeiss Ikon
Apr 3 at 18:24
$begingroup$
@ZeissIkon Surely that seems counter-productive though? Would someone not get lead-poisioning by leaving that bullet inside their body for years? I know that sharp objects that enter the body are usually left in before being removed by medical professionals to prevent further bleeding. I’ve seen vets remove shotgun pellets from a dog before so i am unsure if a doctor would leave a bullet in a human, or at least if that is standard practice.
$endgroup$
– Liam Morris
Apr 3 at 18:35
3
$begingroup$
The body "encysts" foreign objects in scar tissue, which insulates the lead bullet from body fluids. The only time bullets are routinely removed if if they're in a location where friction from movement will break down the cyst, or if they're in a location where there's risk of the bullet moving in a harmful way (in the brain, immediately by the spinal cord or aorta, for instance).
$endgroup$
– Zeiss Ikon
Apr 3 at 18:42
$begingroup$
@ZeissIkon Oh right, i did not know this. I thought that, just by being in the body, the lead would permeate through the skin and cause lead poisoning that way. I would also assume that, if it were possible to easily remove the bullet (such as if it was not burried too deep) a doctor would prefer to do that than leave it in.
$endgroup$
– Liam Morris
Apr 3 at 19:45
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Lead is already poisonous, the addition of mercury might be unnecessary if looking to increase the poisoning potential of a bullet. Instead, I would consider using toxin from poison dart frogs in the bullets.
This toxin is highly lethal to most creatures, including humans, and was used by aboriginal tribes in the rain forest. They coated darts with this poison (likely where the frogs got their name from) and used a blowgun to inject a person with it.
You could employ a similar mechanism with your bullets, either coating them in poison or putting the poison into a specialised bullet meant for storing the liquid and releasing it upon impact. If you really wanted to use mercury though, you could fill the bullet with that instead.
edited Apr 3 at 19:19
Brythan
20.9k74286
answered Apr 3 at 18:28
Liam MorrisLiam Morris
961216
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Botulism toxin is a good poison to use
$endgroup$
– Sonvar
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
As others have said mercury as a poison is just not practical. What might be possible is to use mercury embrittlement to damage vehicles.
video of embrittlement
Now I'm not sure how plausible it is to e.g. hit an aircraft with a mercury bullet, but if you can then mercury embrittlement process should allow the mercury to migrate through the aircraft aluminum structures and considerably weaken them. i.e. it might be able to make an otherwise nonlethal shot to an aircraft lethal
answered 2 days ago
jk.jk.
19815
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
No.
If you dip you bullet in mercury, it will run off. Even if some adheres (and it doesn-t - have you seen mercury?) it will be lost in the high-temperatures following firing.
Even if some does miraculously make it into the victim's body, traces of metallic mercury are not going to cause a health issue.
Suggest you pick something genuinely dangerous, eg saxatoxin or one of the others used by the CIA etc
answered yesterday
David HamblingDavid Hambling
693
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "579"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f143138%2fassassins-bullet-with-mercury%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
9 Answers
9
active
oldest
votes
9 Answers
9
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
No.
If we just dip the bullet in mercury, only trace amounts of mercury will remain. That definitely won't be enough mercury for our purposes.
If we treat a lead (but not iron/steel) bullet for a long time in mercury it will form an amalgam alloy. This can give us sufficient amount of mercury, but adversely affect bullet ballistics. Additionally, an amalgam alloy bullet will likely be removed by subsequent surgery, again, negating our efforts.
If we instead enclose mercury in a hollow bullet, that might work - but it would still be messy and much less effective than cyanide, for example.
answered Apr 3 at 17:46
AlexanderAlexander
21.9k53586
$endgroup$
16
$begingroup$
I've had amalgam tooth fillings. I'm still alive.
$endgroup$
– Mazura
2 days ago
25
$begingroup$
Still alive now, but if someone fires an amalgam filling at you with a sniper rifle it might be bad for your health...
$endgroup$
– Penguino
2 days ago
7
$begingroup$
Ah, so Cyanide Gushers™ Bullets are the answer. Got it.
$endgroup$
– Broots Waymb
2 days ago
2
$begingroup$
@Penguinoif someone fires an amalgam filling at you with a sniper rifle it might be bad for your healthProbalby not. The ballistic trajectory and MoA (Minute of Angle) of an amalgam filling makes it pretty unlikely the shooter would actually be able to hit you with it, unless fired at point blank range.... which would raise questions of who would use a sniper rifle to take a point-blank shot.
$endgroup$
– HopelessN00b
yesterday
5
$begingroup$
@HopelessN00b Someone who suddenly realised their target is a lot closer than anticipated, perhaps?
$endgroup$
– Clonkex
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
No.
If we just dip the bullet in mercury, only trace amounts of mercury will remain. That definitely won't be enough mercury for our purposes.
If we treat a lead (but not iron/steel) bullet for a long time in mercury it will form an amalgam alloy. This can give us sufficient amount of mercury, but adversely affect bullet ballistics. Additionally, an amalgam alloy bullet will likely be removed by subsequent surgery, again, negating our efforts.
If we instead enclose mercury in a hollow bullet, that might work - but it would still be messy and much less effective than cyanide, for example.
answered Apr 3 at 17:46
AlexanderAlexander
21.9k53586
$endgroup$
16
$begingroup$
I've had amalgam tooth fillings. I'm still alive.
$endgroup$
– Mazura
2 days ago
25
$begingroup$
Still alive now, but if someone fires an amalgam filling at you with a sniper rifle it might be bad for your health...
$endgroup$
– Penguino
2 days ago
7
$begingroup$
Ah, so Cyanide Gushers™ Bullets are the answer. Got it.
$endgroup$
– Broots Waymb
2 days ago
2
$begingroup$
@Penguinoif someone fires an amalgam filling at you with a sniper rifle it might be bad for your healthProbalby not. The ballistic trajectory and MoA (Minute of Angle) of an amalgam filling makes it pretty unlikely the shooter would actually be able to hit you with it, unless fired at point blank range.... which would raise questions of who would use a sniper rifle to take a point-blank shot.
$endgroup$
– HopelessN00b
yesterday
5
$begingroup$
@HopelessN00b Someone who suddenly realised their target is a lot closer than anticipated, perhaps?
$endgroup$
– Clonkex
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
No.
If we just dip the bullet in mercury, only trace amounts of mercury will remain. That definitely won't be enough mercury for our purposes.
If we treat a lead (but not iron/steel) bullet for a long time in mercury it will form an amalgam alloy. This can give us sufficient amount of mercury, but adversely affect bullet ballistics. Additionally, an amalgam alloy bullet will likely be removed by subsequent surgery, again, negating our efforts.
If we instead enclose mercury in a hollow bullet, that might work - but it would still be messy and much less effective than cyanide, for example.
answered Apr 3 at 17:46
AlexanderAlexander
21.9k53586
$endgroup$
No.
If we just dip the bullet in mercury, only trace amounts of mercury will remain. That definitely won't be enough mercury for our purposes.
If we treat a lead (but not iron/steel) bullet for a long time in mercury it will form an amalgam alloy. This can give us sufficient amount of mercury, but adversely affect bullet ballistics. Additionally, an amalgam alloy bullet will likely be removed by subsequent surgery, again, negating our efforts.
If we instead enclose mercury in a hollow bullet, that might work - but it would still be messy and much less effective than cyanide, for example.
answered Apr 3 at 17:46
AlexanderAlexander
21.9k53586
edited Apr 3 at 21:41
answered Apr 3 at 17:46
AlexanderAlexander
21.9k53586
answered Apr 3 at 17:46
AlexanderAlexander
21.9k53586
answered Apr 3 at 17:46
AlexanderAlexander
21.9k53586
21.9k53586
16
$begingroup$
I've had amalgam tooth fillings. I'm still alive.
$endgroup$
– Mazura
2 days ago
25
$begingroup$
Still alive now, but if someone fires an amalgam filling at you with a sniper rifle it might be bad for your health...
$endgroup$
– Penguino
2 days ago
7
$begingroup$
Ah, so Cyanide Gushers™ Bullets are the answer. Got it.
$endgroup$
– Broots Waymb
2 days ago
2
$begingroup$
@Penguinoif someone fires an amalgam filling at you with a sniper rifle it might be bad for your healthProbalby not. The ballistic trajectory and MoA (Minute of Angle) of an amalgam filling makes it pretty unlikely the shooter would actually be able to hit you with it, unless fired at point blank range.... which would raise questions of who would use a sniper rifle to take a point-blank shot.
$endgroup$
– HopelessN00b
yesterday
5
$begingroup$
@HopelessN00b Someone who suddenly realised their target is a lot closer than anticipated, perhaps?
$endgroup$
– Clonkex
yesterday
add a comment |
16
$begingroup$
I've had amalgam tooth fillings. I'm still alive.
$endgroup$
– Mazura
2 days ago
25
$begingroup$
Still alive now, but if someone fires an amalgam filling at you with a sniper rifle it might be bad for your health...
$endgroup$
– Penguino
2 days ago
7
$begingroup$
Ah, so Cyanide Gushers™ Bullets are the answer. Got it.
$endgroup$
– Broots Waymb
2 days ago
2
$begingroup$
@Penguinoif someone fires an amalgam filling at you with a sniper rifle it might be bad for your healthProbalby not. The ballistic trajectory and MoA (Minute of Angle) of an amalgam filling makes it pretty unlikely the shooter would actually be able to hit you with it, unless fired at point blank range.... which would raise questions of who would use a sniper rifle to take a point-blank shot.
$endgroup$
– HopelessN00b
yesterday
5
$begingroup$
@HopelessN00b Someone who suddenly realised their target is a lot closer than anticipated, perhaps?
$endgroup$
– Clonkex
yesterday
16
16
$begingroup$
I've had amalgam tooth fillings. I'm still alive.
$endgroup$
– Mazura
2 days ago
$begingroup$
I've had amalgam tooth fillings. I'm still alive.
$endgroup$
– Mazura
2 days ago
25
25
$begingroup$
Still alive now, but if someone fires an amalgam filling at you with a sniper rifle it might be bad for your health...
$endgroup$
– Penguino
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Still alive now, but if someone fires an amalgam filling at you with a sniper rifle it might be bad for your health...
$endgroup$
– Penguino
2 days ago
7
7
$begingroup$
Ah, so Cyanide Gushers™ Bullets are the answer. Got it.
$endgroup$
– Broots Waymb
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Ah, so Cyanide Gushers™ Bullets are the answer. Got it.
$endgroup$
– Broots Waymb
2 days ago
2
2
$begingroup$
@Penguino
if someone fires an amalgam filling at you with a sniper rifle it might be bad for your health Probalby not. The ballistic trajectory and MoA (Minute of Angle) of an amalgam filling makes it pretty unlikely the shooter would actually be able to hit you with it, unless fired at point blank range.... which would raise questions of who would use a sniper rifle to take a point-blank shot.$endgroup$
– HopelessN00b
yesterday
$begingroup$
@Penguino
if someone fires an amalgam filling at you with a sniper rifle it might be bad for your health Probalby not. The ballistic trajectory and MoA (Minute of Angle) of an amalgam filling makes it pretty unlikely the shooter would actually be able to hit you with it, unless fired at point blank range.... which would raise questions of who would use a sniper rifle to take a point-blank shot.$endgroup$
– HopelessN00b
yesterday
5
5
$begingroup$
@HopelessN00b Someone who suddenly realised their target is a lot closer than anticipated, perhaps?
$endgroup$
– Clonkex
yesterday
$begingroup$
@HopelessN00b Someone who suddenly realised their target is a lot closer than anticipated, perhaps?
$endgroup$
– Clonkex
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Mercury has, in the real world, been used to increase the terminal effect of hollow point bullets (especially a the relatively low velocity of pistol bullets). In essence, a short time before firing (so as not to have all the mercury amalgamated with the lead, but some liquid still left at firing) a conventional hollow point is filled with mercury. It was common to press a small caliber gas check (a soft metal disk of precise diameter, with a raised edge) into the hollow point to keep the mercury in place.
On impact, the liquid in the hollow point magnified the hydraulic effect, leading to much stronger and faster expansion of the bullet. The mercury itself was chemically insignificant; it was the expansion effect that was sought. Worth noting here that my source (an article in a gun/reloading publication, but I don't recall which, much less what 1970s vintage issue) also found that the effect was essentially the same using water or oil; any difference between mercury and water being attributable to the greater increase in bullet weight.
Most who use guns for defense now consider penetration more important than expansion, so mercury tip bullets (which have long been legally prohibited as "toxic", however erroneously) are no longer widely considered an effective modification.
edited Apr 3 at 19:18
Brythan
20.9k74286
answered Apr 3 at 18:00
Zeiss IkonZeiss Ikon
2,484117
$endgroup$
9
$begingroup$
Citation needed. I'm pretty certain it has always been a fictional device, with no practical real world implementation. Mercury tipped bullets will, at best, be no better than the normal kind.
$endgroup$
– Starfish Prime
Apr 3 at 18:31
4
$begingroup$
Can't give a citation. I read about this in a gun/reloading source, an article with a "mythbusting" attitude, which showed that yes, there was a definite effect of increasing expansion -- but it was in the 1970s, when hollow points were the rage and those who advocated penetration were largely ignored, at least in the press, and after forty-some years, I don't recall the source. The same article, as I recall, showed that the same effect was obtainable without legal issues using vegetable oil or plain water.
$endgroup$
– Zeiss Ikon
Apr 3 at 18:37
3
$begingroup$
I did find a video of an NaK-filled bullet being used. The alloy is liquid at room temperature. It was shot at very close range (probably a necessity to ensure it actually reached the target) and doesn't appear to be noticably better at expansion than potassium which is merely very soft. Note that in all the cases, the bullet isn't "tipped" so much as the jacket being completely emptied of lead and refilled.
$endgroup$
– Starfish Prime
Apr 3 at 18:58
3
$begingroup$
NaK is so light this isn't a good comparison. Lead is many times denser,and mercury a bit denser than that.
$endgroup$
– Zeiss Ikon
Apr 3 at 19:07
9
$begingroup$
I suspect the "toxic" designation for the bullet is not so much referring to the effect of the mercury on the target (who generally has more important bullet wound trauma to deal with), but to the effect on the environment around them when the bullet exits their body (or when a bullet hits something else, in the case of a missed shot). It would be a pain to clean up bits of mercury scattered all over the area, and dangerous to the cleaning personnel.
$endgroup$
– Blckknght
Apr 3 at 21:14
|
show 5 more comments
$begingroup$
Mercury has, in the real world, been used to increase the terminal effect of hollow point bullets (especially a the relatively low velocity of pistol bullets). In essence, a short time before firing (so as not to have all the mercury amalgamated with the lead, but some liquid still left at firing) a conventional hollow point is filled with mercury. It was common to press a small caliber gas check (a soft metal disk of precise diameter, with a raised edge) into the hollow point to keep the mercury in place.
On impact, the liquid in the hollow point magnified the hydraulic effect, leading to much stronger and faster expansion of the bullet. The mercury itself was chemically insignificant; it was the expansion effect that was sought. Worth noting here that my source (an article in a gun/reloading publication, but I don't recall which, much less what 1970s vintage issue) also found that the effect was essentially the same using water or oil; any difference between mercury and water being attributable to the greater increase in bullet weight.
Most who use guns for defense now consider penetration more important than expansion, so mercury tip bullets (which have long been legally prohibited as "toxic", however erroneously) are no longer widely considered an effective modification.
edited Apr 3 at 19:18
Brythan
20.9k74286
answered Apr 3 at 18:00
Zeiss IkonZeiss Ikon
2,484117
$endgroup$
9
$begingroup$
Citation needed. I'm pretty certain it has always been a fictional device, with no practical real world implementation. Mercury tipped bullets will, at best, be no better than the normal kind.
$endgroup$
– Starfish Prime
Apr 3 at 18:31
4
$begingroup$
Can't give a citation. I read about this in a gun/reloading source, an article with a "mythbusting" attitude, which showed that yes, there was a definite effect of increasing expansion -- but it was in the 1970s, when hollow points were the rage and those who advocated penetration were largely ignored, at least in the press, and after forty-some years, I don't recall the source. The same article, as I recall, showed that the same effect was obtainable without legal issues using vegetable oil or plain water.
$endgroup$
– Zeiss Ikon
Apr 3 at 18:37
3
$begingroup$
I did find a video of an NaK-filled bullet being used. The alloy is liquid at room temperature. It was shot at very close range (probably a necessity to ensure it actually reached the target) and doesn't appear to be noticably better at expansion than potassium which is merely very soft. Note that in all the cases, the bullet isn't "tipped" so much as the jacket being completely emptied of lead and refilled.
$endgroup$
– Starfish Prime
Apr 3 at 18:58
3
$begingroup$
NaK is so light this isn't a good comparison. Lead is many times denser,and mercury a bit denser than that.
$endgroup$
– Zeiss Ikon
Apr 3 at 19:07
9
$begingroup$
I suspect the "toxic" designation for the bullet is not so much referring to the effect of the mercury on the target (who generally has more important bullet wound trauma to deal with), but to the effect on the environment around them when the bullet exits their body (or when a bullet hits something else, in the case of a missed shot). It would be a pain to clean up bits of mercury scattered all over the area, and dangerous to the cleaning personnel.
$endgroup$
– Blckknght
Apr 3 at 21:14
|
show 5 more comments
$begingroup$
Mercury has, in the real world, been used to increase the terminal effect of hollow point bullets (especially a the relatively low velocity of pistol bullets). In essence, a short time before firing (so as not to have all the mercury amalgamated with the lead, but some liquid still left at firing) a conventional hollow point is filled with mercury. It was common to press a small caliber gas check (a soft metal disk of precise diameter, with a raised edge) into the hollow point to keep the mercury in place.
On impact, the liquid in the hollow point magnified the hydraulic effect, leading to much stronger and faster expansion of the bullet. The mercury itself was chemically insignificant; it was the expansion effect that was sought. Worth noting here that my source (an article in a gun/reloading publication, but I don't recall which, much less what 1970s vintage issue) also found that the effect was essentially the same using water or oil; any difference between mercury and water being attributable to the greater increase in bullet weight.
Most who use guns for defense now consider penetration more important than expansion, so mercury tip bullets (which have long been legally prohibited as "toxic", however erroneously) are no longer widely considered an effective modification.
edited Apr 3 at 19:18
Brythan
20.9k74286
answered Apr 3 at 18:00
Zeiss IkonZeiss Ikon
2,484117
$endgroup$
Mercury has, in the real world, been used to increase the terminal effect of hollow point bullets (especially a the relatively low velocity of pistol bullets). In essence, a short time before firing (so as not to have all the mercury amalgamated with the lead, but some liquid still left at firing) a conventional hollow point is filled with mercury. It was common to press a small caliber gas check (a soft metal disk of precise diameter, with a raised edge) into the hollow point to keep the mercury in place.
On impact, the liquid in the hollow point magnified the hydraulic effect, leading to much stronger and faster expansion of the bullet. The mercury itself was chemically insignificant; it was the expansion effect that was sought. Worth noting here that my source (an article in a gun/reloading publication, but I don't recall which, much less what 1970s vintage issue) also found that the effect was essentially the same using water or oil; any difference between mercury and water being attributable to the greater increase in bullet weight.
Most who use guns for defense now consider penetration more important than expansion, so mercury tip bullets (which have long been legally prohibited as "toxic", however erroneously) are no longer widely considered an effective modification.
edited Apr 3 at 19:18
Brythan
20.9k74286
answered Apr 3 at 18:00
Zeiss IkonZeiss Ikon
2,484117
edited Apr 3 at 19:18
Brythan
20.9k74286
edited Apr 3 at 19:18
Brythan
20.9k74286
edited Apr 3 at 19:18
Brythan
20.9k74286
20.9k74286
answered Apr 3 at 18:00
Zeiss IkonZeiss Ikon
2,484117
answered Apr 3 at 18:00
Zeiss IkonZeiss Ikon
2,484117
answered Apr 3 at 18:00
Zeiss IkonZeiss Ikon
2,484117
2,484117
9
$begingroup$
Citation needed. I'm pretty certain it has always been a fictional device, with no practical real world implementation. Mercury tipped bullets will, at best, be no better than the normal kind.
$endgroup$
– Starfish Prime
Apr 3 at 18:31
4
$begingroup$
Can't give a citation. I read about this in a gun/reloading source, an article with a "mythbusting" attitude, which showed that yes, there was a definite effect of increasing expansion -- but it was in the 1970s, when hollow points were the rage and those who advocated penetration were largely ignored, at least in the press, and after forty-some years, I don't recall the source. The same article, as I recall, showed that the same effect was obtainable without legal issues using vegetable oil or plain water.
$endgroup$
– Zeiss Ikon
Apr 3 at 18:37
3
$begingroup$
I did find a video of an NaK-filled bullet being used. The alloy is liquid at room temperature. It was shot at very close range (probably a necessity to ensure it actually reached the target) and doesn't appear to be noticably better at expansion than potassium which is merely very soft. Note that in all the cases, the bullet isn't "tipped" so much as the jacket being completely emptied of lead and refilled.
$endgroup$
– Starfish Prime
Apr 3 at 18:58
3
$begingroup$
NaK is so light this isn't a good comparison. Lead is many times denser,and mercury a bit denser than that.
$endgroup$
– Zeiss Ikon
Apr 3 at 19:07
9
$begingroup$
I suspect the "toxic" designation for the bullet is not so much referring to the effect of the mercury on the target (who generally has more important bullet wound trauma to deal with), but to the effect on the environment around them when the bullet exits their body (or when a bullet hits something else, in the case of a missed shot). It would be a pain to clean up bits of mercury scattered all over the area, and dangerous to the cleaning personnel.
$endgroup$
– Blckknght
Apr 3 at 21:14
|
show 5 more comments
9
$begingroup$
Citation needed. I'm pretty certain it has always been a fictional device, with no practical real world implementation. Mercury tipped bullets will, at best, be no better than the normal kind.
$endgroup$
– Starfish Prime
Apr 3 at 18:31
4
$begingroup$
Can't give a citation. I read about this in a gun/reloading source, an article with a "mythbusting" attitude, which showed that yes, there was a definite effect of increasing expansion -- but it was in the 1970s, when hollow points were the rage and those who advocated penetration were largely ignored, at least in the press, and after forty-some years, I don't recall the source. The same article, as I recall, showed that the same effect was obtainable without legal issues using vegetable oil or plain water.
$endgroup$
– Zeiss Ikon
Apr 3 at 18:37
3
$begingroup$
I did find a video of an NaK-filled bullet being used. The alloy is liquid at room temperature. It was shot at very close range (probably a necessity to ensure it actually reached the target) and doesn't appear to be noticably better at expansion than potassium which is merely very soft. Note that in all the cases, the bullet isn't "tipped" so much as the jacket being completely emptied of lead and refilled.
$endgroup$
– Starfish Prime
Apr 3 at 18:58
3
$begingroup$
NaK is so light this isn't a good comparison. Lead is many times denser,and mercury a bit denser than that.
$endgroup$
– Zeiss Ikon
Apr 3 at 19:07
9
$begingroup$
I suspect the "toxic" designation for the bullet is not so much referring to the effect of the mercury on the target (who generally has more important bullet wound trauma to deal with), but to the effect on the environment around them when the bullet exits their body (or when a bullet hits something else, in the case of a missed shot). It would be a pain to clean up bits of mercury scattered all over the area, and dangerous to the cleaning personnel.
$endgroup$
– Blckknght
Apr 3 at 21:14
9
9
$begingroup$
Citation needed. I'm pretty certain it has always been a fictional device, with no practical real world implementation. Mercury tipped bullets will, at best, be no better than the normal kind.
$endgroup$
– Starfish Prime
Apr 3 at 18:31
$begingroup$
Citation needed. I'm pretty certain it has always been a fictional device, with no practical real world implementation. Mercury tipped bullets will, at best, be no better than the normal kind.
$endgroup$
– Starfish Prime
Apr 3 at 18:31
4
4
$begingroup$
Can't give a citation. I read about this in a gun/reloading source, an article with a "mythbusting" attitude, which showed that yes, there was a definite effect of increasing expansion -- but it was in the 1970s, when hollow points were the rage and those who advocated penetration were largely ignored, at least in the press, and after forty-some years, I don't recall the source. The same article, as I recall, showed that the same effect was obtainable without legal issues using vegetable oil or plain water.
$endgroup$
– Zeiss Ikon
Apr 3 at 18:37
$begingroup$
Can't give a citation. I read about this in a gun/reloading source, an article with a "mythbusting" attitude, which showed that yes, there was a definite effect of increasing expansion -- but it was in the 1970s, when hollow points were the rage and those who advocated penetration were largely ignored, at least in the press, and after forty-some years, I don't recall the source. The same article, as I recall, showed that the same effect was obtainable without legal issues using vegetable oil or plain water.
$endgroup$
– Zeiss Ikon
Apr 3 at 18:37
3
3
$begingroup$
I did find a video of an NaK-filled bullet being used. The alloy is liquid at room temperature. It was shot at very close range (probably a necessity to ensure it actually reached the target) and doesn't appear to be noticably better at expansion than potassium which is merely very soft. Note that in all the cases, the bullet isn't "tipped" so much as the jacket being completely emptied of lead and refilled.
$endgroup$
– Starfish Prime
Apr 3 at 18:58
$begingroup$
I did find a video of an NaK-filled bullet being used. The alloy is liquid at room temperature. It was shot at very close range (probably a necessity to ensure it actually reached the target) and doesn't appear to be noticably better at expansion than potassium which is merely very soft. Note that in all the cases, the bullet isn't "tipped" so much as the jacket being completely emptied of lead and refilled.
$endgroup$
– Starfish Prime
Apr 3 at 18:58
3
3
$begingroup$
NaK is so light this isn't a good comparison. Lead is many times denser,and mercury a bit denser than that.
$endgroup$
– Zeiss Ikon
Apr 3 at 19:07
$begingroup$
NaK is so light this isn't a good comparison. Lead is many times denser,and mercury a bit denser than that.
$endgroup$
– Zeiss Ikon
Apr 3 at 19:07
9
9
$begingroup$
I suspect the "toxic" designation for the bullet is not so much referring to the effect of the mercury on the target (who generally has more important bullet wound trauma to deal with), but to the effect on the environment around them when the bullet exits their body (or when a bullet hits something else, in the case of a missed shot). It would be a pain to clean up bits of mercury scattered all over the area, and dangerous to the cleaning personnel.
$endgroup$
– Blckknght
Apr 3 at 21:14
$begingroup$
I suspect the "toxic" designation for the bullet is not so much referring to the effect of the mercury on the target (who generally has more important bullet wound trauma to deal with), but to the effect on the environment around them when the bullet exits their body (or when a bullet hits something else, in the case of a missed shot). It would be a pain to clean up bits of mercury scattered all over the area, and dangerous to the cleaning personnel.
$endgroup$
– Blckknght
Apr 3 at 21:14
|
show 5 more comments
$begingroup$
While the answer to the question is not a hard no, there are way better options for the same effect.
If your goal is death by "heavy metal poisoning", then I'd suggest depleted uranium rounds instead. Uranium is far more toxic than mercury, plus comes with some impressive armor penetrating properties as an added bonus. DU rounds also have a tendency to liquify/vaporize on impact so even though it's solid at rest, it can still splatter on impact fatally infecting the wounded person's bloodstream, but as David pointed out, getting them to splatter against soft tissue is unlikely.
Either way, heavy metal poisoning is a slow death which is probably not what an assassin wants on a near miss. A better approach would probably be a low-caliber explosive round. While they violate all sorts of international laws and treaties, an explosive rifle round to the arm, leg, or gut would still cause enough mutilation that your target is likely to quickly bleed out and die.
If you really want to be inhuman, combine the ideas by making a sodium/potassium round with a DU jacket. If the blast does not kill you, the DU shrapnel will, and if that fails, the blast will still vaporize a lethal dose of uranium into your bloodstream.
answered Apr 3 at 22:01
NosajimikiNosajimiki
2,460119
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
DU rounds from A10's were used for anti personnel operations during Iraq 1/Desert Storm. Rumor says that the effect was roughly the same as a giant sausage grinder going through the camps. You might call that heavy metal poisoning, but not in the strictly chemical sense of the word.
$endgroup$
– pojo-guy
yesterday
1
$begingroup$
Actually, DU is not useful for this. There are veterans with DU shrapnel still walking around years afterwards (ditton with lead bullets - toxic, not absorbed via that route) . DU dust or vapour is much, much more toxic.
$endgroup$
– David Hambling
yesterday
1
$begingroup$
DU has a tendency to vaporize when hitting armor. Not when hitting a person.
$endgroup$
– Loren Pechtel
21 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
While the answer to the question is not a hard no, there are way better options for the same effect.
If your goal is death by "heavy metal poisoning", then I'd suggest depleted uranium rounds instead. Uranium is far more toxic than mercury, plus comes with some impressive armor penetrating properties as an added bonus. DU rounds also have a tendency to liquify/vaporize on impact so even though it's solid at rest, it can still splatter on impact fatally infecting the wounded person's bloodstream, but as David pointed out, getting them to splatter against soft tissue is unlikely.
Either way, heavy metal poisoning is a slow death which is probably not what an assassin wants on a near miss. A better approach would probably be a low-caliber explosive round. While they violate all sorts of international laws and treaties, an explosive rifle round to the arm, leg, or gut would still cause enough mutilation that your target is likely to quickly bleed out and die.
If you really want to be inhuman, combine the ideas by making a sodium/potassium round with a DU jacket. If the blast does not kill you, the DU shrapnel will, and if that fails, the blast will still vaporize a lethal dose of uranium into your bloodstream.
answered Apr 3 at 22:01
NosajimikiNosajimiki
2,460119
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
DU rounds from A10's were used for anti personnel operations during Iraq 1/Desert Storm. Rumor says that the effect was roughly the same as a giant sausage grinder going through the camps. You might call that heavy metal poisoning, but not in the strictly chemical sense of the word.
$endgroup$
– pojo-guy
yesterday
1
$begingroup$
Actually, DU is not useful for this. There are veterans with DU shrapnel still walking around years afterwards (ditton with lead bullets - toxic, not absorbed via that route) . DU dust or vapour is much, much more toxic.
$endgroup$
– David Hambling
yesterday
1
$begingroup$
DU has a tendency to vaporize when hitting armor. Not when hitting a person.
$endgroup$
– Loren Pechtel
21 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
While the answer to the question is not a hard no, there are way better options for the same effect.
If your goal is death by "heavy metal poisoning", then I'd suggest depleted uranium rounds instead. Uranium is far more toxic than mercury, plus comes with some impressive armor penetrating properties as an added bonus. DU rounds also have a tendency to liquify/vaporize on impact so even though it's solid at rest, it can still splatter on impact fatally infecting the wounded person's bloodstream, but as David pointed out, getting them to splatter against soft tissue is unlikely.
Either way, heavy metal poisoning is a slow death which is probably not what an assassin wants on a near miss. A better approach would probably be a low-caliber explosive round. While they violate all sorts of international laws and treaties, an explosive rifle round to the arm, leg, or gut would still cause enough mutilation that your target is likely to quickly bleed out and die.
If you really want to be inhuman, combine the ideas by making a sodium/potassium round with a DU jacket. If the blast does not kill you, the DU shrapnel will, and if that fails, the blast will still vaporize a lethal dose of uranium into your bloodstream.
answered Apr 3 at 22:01
NosajimikiNosajimiki
2,460119
$endgroup$
While the answer to the question is not a hard no, there are way better options for the same effect.
If your goal is death by "heavy metal poisoning", then I'd suggest depleted uranium rounds instead. Uranium is far more toxic than mercury, plus comes with some impressive armor penetrating properties as an added bonus. DU rounds also have a tendency to liquify/vaporize on impact so even though it's solid at rest, it can still splatter on impact fatally infecting the wounded person's bloodstream, but as David pointed out, getting them to splatter against soft tissue is unlikely.
Either way, heavy metal poisoning is a slow death which is probably not what an assassin wants on a near miss. A better approach would probably be a low-caliber explosive round. While they violate all sorts of international laws and treaties, an explosive rifle round to the arm, leg, or gut would still cause enough mutilation that your target is likely to quickly bleed out and die.
If you really want to be inhuman, combine the ideas by making a sodium/potassium round with a DU jacket. If the blast does not kill you, the DU shrapnel will, and if that fails, the blast will still vaporize a lethal dose of uranium into your bloodstream.
answered Apr 3 at 22:01
NosajimikiNosajimiki
2,460119
edited yesterday
answered Apr 3 at 22:01
NosajimikiNosajimiki
2,460119
answered Apr 3 at 22:01
NosajimikiNosajimiki
2,460119
answered Apr 3 at 22:01
NosajimikiNosajimiki
2,460119
2,460119
$begingroup$
DU rounds from A10's were used for anti personnel operations during Iraq 1/Desert Storm. Rumor says that the effect was roughly the same as a giant sausage grinder going through the camps. You might call that heavy metal poisoning, but not in the strictly chemical sense of the word.
$endgroup$
– pojo-guy
yesterday
1
$begingroup$
Actually, DU is not useful for this. There are veterans with DU shrapnel still walking around years afterwards (ditton with lead bullets - toxic, not absorbed via that route) . DU dust or vapour is much, much more toxic.
$endgroup$
– David Hambling
yesterday
1
$begingroup$
DU has a tendency to vaporize when hitting armor. Not when hitting a person.
$endgroup$
– Loren Pechtel
21 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
DU rounds from A10's were used for anti personnel operations during Iraq 1/Desert Storm. Rumor says that the effect was roughly the same as a giant sausage grinder going through the camps. You might call that heavy metal poisoning, but not in the strictly chemical sense of the word.
$endgroup$
– pojo-guy
yesterday
1
$begingroup$
Actually, DU is not useful for this. There are veterans with DU shrapnel still walking around years afterwards (ditton with lead bullets - toxic, not absorbed via that route) . DU dust or vapour is much, much more toxic.
$endgroup$
– David Hambling
yesterday
1
$begingroup$
DU has a tendency to vaporize when hitting armor. Not when hitting a person.
$endgroup$
– Loren Pechtel
21 hours ago
$begingroup$
DU rounds from A10's were used for anti personnel operations during Iraq 1/Desert Storm. Rumor says that the effect was roughly the same as a giant sausage grinder going through the camps. You might call that heavy metal poisoning, but not in the strictly chemical sense of the word.
$endgroup$
– pojo-guy
yesterday
$begingroup$
DU rounds from A10's were used for anti personnel operations during Iraq 1/Desert Storm. Rumor says that the effect was roughly the same as a giant sausage grinder going through the camps. You might call that heavy metal poisoning, but not in the strictly chemical sense of the word.
$endgroup$
– pojo-guy
yesterday
1
1
$begingroup$
Actually, DU is not useful for this. There are veterans with DU shrapnel still walking around years afterwards (ditton with lead bullets - toxic, not absorbed via that route) . DU dust or vapour is much, much more toxic.
$endgroup$
– David Hambling
yesterday
$begingroup$
Actually, DU is not useful for this. There are veterans with DU shrapnel still walking around years afterwards (ditton with lead bullets - toxic, not absorbed via that route) . DU dust or vapour is much, much more toxic.
$endgroup$
– David Hambling
yesterday
1
1
$begingroup$
DU has a tendency to vaporize when hitting armor. Not when hitting a person.
$endgroup$
– Loren Pechtel
21 hours ago
$begingroup$
DU has a tendency to vaporize when hitting armor. Not when hitting a person.
$endgroup$
– Loren Pechtel
21 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
No.
Not even in the form of dimethylmercury.
This extremely nasty organic compound was being carefully used by professional toxic metal researcher Karen Wetterhahn when a few small drops of it touched the outside of her latex gloves. At the time it was not known that this noxious substance could travel through latex. Nothing could be done, she died less than a year later.
To make enough stick to a (hot - >100 celsius) bullet in flight, because it would otherwise evaporate before reaching your target, dipping the bullet would not work, you'd need some water soluble delivery system which releases after impact which would not satisfy the requirements of the question - but careful how your protagonist uses it, lest they succumb the same way.
Edited due to being wrong all over.
answered Apr 3 at 17:57
AgrajagAgrajag
7,11411550
$endgroup$
6
$begingroup$
How hot do bullets get when fired?. TL;DR: at least 100 degrees Celsius, above the boiling point of dimethylmercury.
$endgroup$
– Brythan
Apr 3 at 19:17
3
$begingroup$
I guess you could drill a hole in the end of the bullet, fill it with the noxious substance and then plug it with something like epoxy. A few tests with dye and ballistic gel would confirm whether it's effective or not.
$endgroup$
– Spehro Pefhany
Apr 3 at 20:13
add a comment |
$begingroup$
No.
Not even in the form of dimethylmercury.
This extremely nasty organic compound was being carefully used by professional toxic metal researcher Karen Wetterhahn when a few small drops of it touched the outside of her latex gloves. At the time it was not known that this noxious substance could travel through latex. Nothing could be done, she died less than a year later.
To make enough stick to a (hot - >100 celsius) bullet in flight, because it would otherwise evaporate before reaching your target, dipping the bullet would not work, you'd need some water soluble delivery system which releases after impact which would not satisfy the requirements of the question - but careful how your protagonist uses it, lest they succumb the same way.
Edited due to being wrong all over.
answered Apr 3 at 17:57
AgrajagAgrajag
7,11411550
$endgroup$
6
$begingroup$
How hot do bullets get when fired?. TL;DR: at least 100 degrees Celsius, above the boiling point of dimethylmercury.
$endgroup$
– Brythan
Apr 3 at 19:17
3
$begingroup$
I guess you could drill a hole in the end of the bullet, fill it with the noxious substance and then plug it with something like epoxy. A few tests with dye and ballistic gel would confirm whether it's effective or not.
$endgroup$
– Spehro Pefhany
Apr 3 at 20:13
add a comment |
$begingroup$
No.
Not even in the form of dimethylmercury.
This extremely nasty organic compound was being carefully used by professional toxic metal researcher Karen Wetterhahn when a few small drops of it touched the outside of her latex gloves. At the time it was not known that this noxious substance could travel through latex. Nothing could be done, she died less than a year later.
To make enough stick to a (hot - >100 celsius) bullet in flight, because it would otherwise evaporate before reaching your target, dipping the bullet would not work, you'd need some water soluble delivery system which releases after impact which would not satisfy the requirements of the question - but careful how your protagonist uses it, lest they succumb the same way.
Edited due to being wrong all over.
answered Apr 3 at 17:57
AgrajagAgrajag
7,11411550
$endgroup$
No.
Not even in the form of dimethylmercury.
This extremely nasty organic compound was being carefully used by professional toxic metal researcher Karen Wetterhahn when a few small drops of it touched the outside of her latex gloves. At the time it was not known that this noxious substance could travel through latex. Nothing could be done, she died less than a year later.
To make enough stick to a (hot - >100 celsius) bullet in flight, because it would otherwise evaporate before reaching your target, dipping the bullet would not work, you'd need some water soluble delivery system which releases after impact which would not satisfy the requirements of the question - but careful how your protagonist uses it, lest they succumb the same way.
Edited due to being wrong all over.
answered Apr 3 at 17:57
AgrajagAgrajag
7,11411550
edited Apr 3 at 19:34
answered Apr 3 at 17:57
AgrajagAgrajag
7,11411550
answered Apr 3 at 17:57
AgrajagAgrajag
7,11411550
answered Apr 3 at 17:57
AgrajagAgrajag
7,11411550
7,11411550
6
$begingroup$
How hot do bullets get when fired?. TL;DR: at least 100 degrees Celsius, above the boiling point of dimethylmercury.
$endgroup$
– Brythan
Apr 3 at 19:17
3
$begingroup$
I guess you could drill a hole in the end of the bullet, fill it with the noxious substance and then plug it with something like epoxy. A few tests with dye and ballistic gel would confirm whether it's effective or not.
$endgroup$
– Spehro Pefhany
Apr 3 at 20:13
add a comment |
6
$begingroup$
How hot do bullets get when fired?. TL;DR: at least 100 degrees Celsius, above the boiling point of dimethylmercury.
$endgroup$
– Brythan
Apr 3 at 19:17
3
$begingroup$
I guess you could drill a hole in the end of the bullet, fill it with the noxious substance and then plug it with something like epoxy. A few tests with dye and ballistic gel would confirm whether it's effective or not.
$endgroup$
– Spehro Pefhany
Apr 3 at 20:13
6
6
$begingroup$
How hot do bullets get when fired?. TL;DR: at least 100 degrees Celsius, above the boiling point of dimethylmercury.
$endgroup$
– Brythan
Apr 3 at 19:17
$begingroup$
How hot do bullets get when fired?. TL;DR: at least 100 degrees Celsius, above the boiling point of dimethylmercury.
$endgroup$
– Brythan
Apr 3 at 19:17
3
3
$begingroup$
I guess you could drill a hole in the end of the bullet, fill it with the noxious substance and then plug it with something like epoxy. A few tests with dye and ballistic gel would confirm whether it's effective or not.
$endgroup$
– Spehro Pefhany
Apr 3 at 20:13
$begingroup$
I guess you could drill a hole in the end of the bullet, fill it with the noxious substance and then plug it with something like epoxy. A few tests with dye and ballistic gel would confirm whether it's effective or not.
$endgroup$
– Spehro Pefhany
Apr 3 at 20:13
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Mercury as a LD50 of between 1mg/kg to 100 mg/kg. depending on the chemical properties of the mercury you choose to use you may need up to 10g to make if potentially lethal. Assuming you use the most soluble form of mercury, you would still want to up the dose significantly to overcome elements such as splatter, bullet passing through entirely or just not absorbed by the body. This would add significantly to the weight of the bullet and may mess with its ballistics.
If you choose another element, such as polonium or plutonium, you may have better success. Both are highly toxic due to chemical toxicity and radiological toxicity. I'm not entirely sure of the chemical properties of polonium, but plutonium is a dense metal, similar to uranium. It can easily be made into a bullet that shoots properly, similar to depleted uranium. You would only need 5mg to be chemically toxic. If you have a 7.5g mixed metal plutonium round, it would ensure poisoning of the target. However, that death by heavy metal poisoning would take a long while to occur, depending on the amount of metal the body absorbed prior to the bullets removal.
answered Apr 3 at 22:46
SonvarSonvar
7947
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
I'm pretty sure the atomic regulatory agency in whatever jurisdiction our assassin lives would get very interested if they set out to acquire any amount of plutonium, even milligrams.
$endgroup$
– Blckknght
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Great thing about plutonium is it tends to be a waste product in LEU reactors, (Pu-238 and 240 are readily produced and is effectively useless for further fissions.) Now if you find a location that has lax controls on their spent fuel waste, then it would be fairly easy to acquire.
$endgroup$
– Sonvar
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Mercury as a LD50 of between 1mg/kg to 100 mg/kg. depending on the chemical properties of the mercury you choose to use you may need up to 10g to make if potentially lethal. Assuming you use the most soluble form of mercury, you would still want to up the dose significantly to overcome elements such as splatter, bullet passing through entirely or just not absorbed by the body. This would add significantly to the weight of the bullet and may mess with its ballistics.
If you choose another element, such as polonium or plutonium, you may have better success. Both are highly toxic due to chemical toxicity and radiological toxicity. I'm not entirely sure of the chemical properties of polonium, but plutonium is a dense metal, similar to uranium. It can easily be made into a bullet that shoots properly, similar to depleted uranium. You would only need 5mg to be chemically toxic. If you have a 7.5g mixed metal plutonium round, it would ensure poisoning of the target. However, that death by heavy metal poisoning would take a long while to occur, depending on the amount of metal the body absorbed prior to the bullets removal.
answered Apr 3 at 22:46
SonvarSonvar
7947
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
I'm pretty sure the atomic regulatory agency in whatever jurisdiction our assassin lives would get very interested if they set out to acquire any amount of plutonium, even milligrams.
$endgroup$
– Blckknght
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Great thing about plutonium is it tends to be a waste product in LEU reactors, (Pu-238 and 240 are readily produced and is effectively useless for further fissions.) Now if you find a location that has lax controls on their spent fuel waste, then it would be fairly easy to acquire.
$endgroup$
– Sonvar
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Mercury as a LD50 of between 1mg/kg to 100 mg/kg. depending on the chemical properties of the mercury you choose to use you may need up to 10g to make if potentially lethal. Assuming you use the most soluble form of mercury, you would still want to up the dose significantly to overcome elements such as splatter, bullet passing through entirely or just not absorbed by the body. This would add significantly to the weight of the bullet and may mess with its ballistics.
If you choose another element, such as polonium or plutonium, you may have better success. Both are highly toxic due to chemical toxicity and radiological toxicity. I'm not entirely sure of the chemical properties of polonium, but plutonium is a dense metal, similar to uranium. It can easily be made into a bullet that shoots properly, similar to depleted uranium. You would only need 5mg to be chemically toxic. If you have a 7.5g mixed metal plutonium round, it would ensure poisoning of the target. However, that death by heavy metal poisoning would take a long while to occur, depending on the amount of metal the body absorbed prior to the bullets removal.
answered Apr 3 at 22:46
SonvarSonvar
7947
$endgroup$
Mercury as a LD50 of between 1mg/kg to 100 mg/kg. depending on the chemical properties of the mercury you choose to use you may need up to 10g to make if potentially lethal. Assuming you use the most soluble form of mercury, you would still want to up the dose significantly to overcome elements such as splatter, bullet passing through entirely or just not absorbed by the body. This would add significantly to the weight of the bullet and may mess with its ballistics.
If you choose another element, such as polonium or plutonium, you may have better success. Both are highly toxic due to chemical toxicity and radiological toxicity. I'm not entirely sure of the chemical properties of polonium, but plutonium is a dense metal, similar to uranium. It can easily be made into a bullet that shoots properly, similar to depleted uranium. You would only need 5mg to be chemically toxic. If you have a 7.5g mixed metal plutonium round, it would ensure poisoning of the target. However, that death by heavy metal poisoning would take a long while to occur, depending on the amount of metal the body absorbed prior to the bullets removal.
answered Apr 3 at 22:46
SonvarSonvar
7947
answered Apr 3 at 22:46
SonvarSonvar
7947
answered Apr 3 at 22:46
SonvarSonvar
7947
answered Apr 3 at 22:46
SonvarSonvar
7947
7947
2
$begingroup$
I'm pretty sure the atomic regulatory agency in whatever jurisdiction our assassin lives would get very interested if they set out to acquire any amount of plutonium, even milligrams.
$endgroup$
– Blckknght
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Great thing about plutonium is it tends to be a waste product in LEU reactors, (Pu-238 and 240 are readily produced and is effectively useless for further fissions.) Now if you find a location that has lax controls on their spent fuel waste, then it would be fairly easy to acquire.
$endgroup$
– Sonvar
2 days ago
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
I'm pretty sure the atomic regulatory agency in whatever jurisdiction our assassin lives would get very interested if they set out to acquire any amount of plutonium, even milligrams.
$endgroup$
– Blckknght
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Great thing about plutonium is it tends to be a waste product in LEU reactors, (Pu-238 and 240 are readily produced and is effectively useless for further fissions.) Now if you find a location that has lax controls on their spent fuel waste, then it would be fairly easy to acquire.
$endgroup$
– Sonvar
2 days ago
2
2
$begingroup$
I'm pretty sure the atomic regulatory agency in whatever jurisdiction our assassin lives would get very interested if they set out to acquire any amount of plutonium, even milligrams.
$endgroup$
– Blckknght
2 days ago
$begingroup$
I'm pretty sure the atomic regulatory agency in whatever jurisdiction our assassin lives would get very interested if they set out to acquire any amount of plutonium, even milligrams.
$endgroup$
– Blckknght
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Great thing about plutonium is it tends to be a waste product in LEU reactors, (Pu-238 and 240 are readily produced and is effectively useless for further fissions.) Now if you find a location that has lax controls on their spent fuel waste, then it would be fairly easy to acquire.
$endgroup$
– Sonvar
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Great thing about plutonium is it tends to be a waste product in LEU reactors, (Pu-238 and 240 are readily produced and is effectively useless for further fissions.) Now if you find a location that has lax controls on their spent fuel waste, then it would be fairly easy to acquire.
$endgroup$
– Sonvar
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
No, because you need more Mercury than the fatal dose that can be delivered in a bullet. Adding the Mercury sure will make your victim uncomfortable until the body sheds the excess amount down to acceptable levels.
Mercury when ingested targets blood, kidneys, central nervous system, liver and the brain. Large doses of Mercury will lead to easily identifiable health symptoms Administration of a chelating agent can help reduce the effects on the body.
Acute Mercury poisoning will lead to death, but generally that death will be due to an already existing kidney or liver damage. There is always the possibility that exposure will cause a failure of the central nervous system, which could lead to death.
In essence, that big new hole in the body from he gunshot wound will be far more fatal either from tissue damage or a secondary infection.
- https://fscimage.fishersci.com/msds/96252.htm
answered Apr 3 at 18:02
gwallygwally
3,526814
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Metallic mercury doesn't form soluble compounds easily. if the mercury isn't already in an organic compound form, it's not noticeably worse than lead -- and contrary to popular fiction, bullets are usually left in the body, because removing them will do more harm than leaving them will.
$endgroup$
– Zeiss Ikon
Apr 3 at 18:24
$begingroup$
@ZeissIkon Surely that seems counter-productive though? Would someone not get lead-poisioning by leaving that bullet inside their body for years? I know that sharp objects that enter the body are usually left in before being removed by medical professionals to prevent further bleeding. I’ve seen vets remove shotgun pellets from a dog before so i am unsure if a doctor would leave a bullet in a human, or at least if that is standard practice.
$endgroup$
– Liam Morris
Apr 3 at 18:35
3
$begingroup$
The body "encysts" foreign objects in scar tissue, which insulates the lead bullet from body fluids. The only time bullets are routinely removed if if they're in a location where friction from movement will break down the cyst, or if they're in a location where there's risk of the bullet moving in a harmful way (in the brain, immediately by the spinal cord or aorta, for instance).
$endgroup$
– Zeiss Ikon
Apr 3 at 18:42
$begingroup$
@ZeissIkon Oh right, i did not know this. I thought that, just by being in the body, the lead would permeate through the skin and cause lead poisoning that way. I would also assume that, if it were possible to easily remove the bullet (such as if it was not burried too deep) a doctor would prefer to do that than leave it in.
$endgroup$
– Liam Morris
Apr 3 at 19:45
add a comment |
$begingroup$
No, because you need more Mercury than the fatal dose that can be delivered in a bullet. Adding the Mercury sure will make your victim uncomfortable until the body sheds the excess amount down to acceptable levels.
Mercury when ingested targets blood, kidneys, central nervous system, liver and the brain. Large doses of Mercury will lead to easily identifiable health symptoms Administration of a chelating agent can help reduce the effects on the body.
Acute Mercury poisoning will lead to death, but generally that death will be due to an already existing kidney or liver damage. There is always the possibility that exposure will cause a failure of the central nervous system, which could lead to death.
In essence, that big new hole in the body from he gunshot wound will be far more fatal either from tissue damage or a secondary infection.
- https://fscimage.fishersci.com/msds/96252.htm
answered Apr 3 at 18:02
gwallygwally
3,526814
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Metallic mercury doesn't form soluble compounds easily. if the mercury isn't already in an organic compound form, it's not noticeably worse than lead -- and contrary to popular fiction, bullets are usually left in the body, because removing them will do more harm than leaving them will.
$endgroup$
– Zeiss Ikon
Apr 3 at 18:24
$begingroup$
@ZeissIkon Surely that seems counter-productive though? Would someone not get lead-poisioning by leaving that bullet inside their body for years? I know that sharp objects that enter the body are usually left in before being removed by medical professionals to prevent further bleeding. I’ve seen vets remove shotgun pellets from a dog before so i am unsure if a doctor would leave a bullet in a human, or at least if that is standard practice.
$endgroup$
– Liam Morris
Apr 3 at 18:35
3
$begingroup$
The body "encysts" foreign objects in scar tissue, which insulates the lead bullet from body fluids. The only time bullets are routinely removed if if they're in a location where friction from movement will break down the cyst, or if they're in a location where there's risk of the bullet moving in a harmful way (in the brain, immediately by the spinal cord or aorta, for instance).
$endgroup$
– Zeiss Ikon
Apr 3 at 18:42
$begingroup$
@ZeissIkon Oh right, i did not know this. I thought that, just by being in the body, the lead would permeate through the skin and cause lead poisoning that way. I would also assume that, if it were possible to easily remove the bullet (such as if it was not burried too deep) a doctor would prefer to do that than leave it in.
$endgroup$
– Liam Morris
Apr 3 at 19:45
add a comment |
$begingroup$
No, because you need more Mercury than the fatal dose that can be delivered in a bullet. Adding the Mercury sure will make your victim uncomfortable until the body sheds the excess amount down to acceptable levels.
Mercury when ingested targets blood, kidneys, central nervous system, liver and the brain. Large doses of Mercury will lead to easily identifiable health symptoms Administration of a chelating agent can help reduce the effects on the body.
Acute Mercury poisoning will lead to death, but generally that death will be due to an already existing kidney or liver damage. There is always the possibility that exposure will cause a failure of the central nervous system, which could lead to death.
In essence, that big new hole in the body from he gunshot wound will be far more fatal either from tissue damage or a secondary infection.
- https://fscimage.fishersci.com/msds/96252.htm
answered Apr 3 at 18:02
gwallygwally
3,526814
$endgroup$
No, because you need more Mercury than the fatal dose that can be delivered in a bullet. Adding the Mercury sure will make your victim uncomfortable until the body sheds the excess amount down to acceptable levels.
Mercury when ingested targets blood, kidneys, central nervous system, liver and the brain. Large doses of Mercury will lead to easily identifiable health symptoms Administration of a chelating agent can help reduce the effects on the body.
Acute Mercury poisoning will lead to death, but generally that death will be due to an already existing kidney or liver damage. There is always the possibility that exposure will cause a failure of the central nervous system, which could lead to death.
In essence, that big new hole in the body from he gunshot wound will be far more fatal either from tissue damage or a secondary infection.
- https://fscimage.fishersci.com/msds/96252.htm
answered Apr 3 at 18:02
gwallygwally
3,526814
edited 2 days ago
answered Apr 3 at 18:02
gwallygwally
3,526814
answered Apr 3 at 18:02
gwallygwally
3,526814
answered Apr 3 at 18:02
gwallygwally
3,526814
3,526814
$begingroup$
Metallic mercury doesn't form soluble compounds easily. if the mercury isn't already in an organic compound form, it's not noticeably worse than lead -- and contrary to popular fiction, bullets are usually left in the body, because removing them will do more harm than leaving them will.
$endgroup$
– Zeiss Ikon
Apr 3 at 18:24
$begingroup$
@ZeissIkon Surely that seems counter-productive though? Would someone not get lead-poisioning by leaving that bullet inside their body for years? I know that sharp objects that enter the body are usually left in before being removed by medical professionals to prevent further bleeding. I’ve seen vets remove shotgun pellets from a dog before so i am unsure if a doctor would leave a bullet in a human, or at least if that is standard practice.
$endgroup$
– Liam Morris
Apr 3 at 18:35
3
$begingroup$
The body "encysts" foreign objects in scar tissue, which insulates the lead bullet from body fluids. The only time bullets are routinely removed if if they're in a location where friction from movement will break down the cyst, or if they're in a location where there's risk of the bullet moving in a harmful way (in the brain, immediately by the spinal cord or aorta, for instance).
$endgroup$
– Zeiss Ikon
Apr 3 at 18:42
$begingroup$
@ZeissIkon Oh right, i did not know this. I thought that, just by being in the body, the lead would permeate through the skin and cause lead poisoning that way. I would also assume that, if it were possible to easily remove the bullet (such as if it was not burried too deep) a doctor would prefer to do that than leave it in.
$endgroup$
– Liam Morris
Apr 3 at 19:45
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Metallic mercury doesn't form soluble compounds easily. if the mercury isn't already in an organic compound form, it's not noticeably worse than lead -- and contrary to popular fiction, bullets are usually left in the body, because removing them will do more harm than leaving them will.
$endgroup$
– Zeiss Ikon
Apr 3 at 18:24
$begingroup$
@ZeissIkon Surely that seems counter-productive though? Would someone not get lead-poisioning by leaving that bullet inside their body for years? I know that sharp objects that enter the body are usually left in before being removed by medical professionals to prevent further bleeding. I’ve seen vets remove shotgun pellets from a dog before so i am unsure if a doctor would leave a bullet in a human, or at least if that is standard practice.
$endgroup$
– Liam Morris
Apr 3 at 18:35
3
$begingroup$
The body "encysts" foreign objects in scar tissue, which insulates the lead bullet from body fluids. The only time bullets are routinely removed if if they're in a location where friction from movement will break down the cyst, or if they're in a location where there's risk of the bullet moving in a harmful way (in the brain, immediately by the spinal cord or aorta, for instance).
$endgroup$
– Zeiss Ikon
Apr 3 at 18:42
$begingroup$
@ZeissIkon Oh right, i did not know this. I thought that, just by being in the body, the lead would permeate through the skin and cause lead poisoning that way. I would also assume that, if it were possible to easily remove the bullet (such as if it was not burried too deep) a doctor would prefer to do that than leave it in.
$endgroup$
– Liam Morris
Apr 3 at 19:45
$begingroup$
Metallic mercury doesn't form soluble compounds easily. if the mercury isn't already in an organic compound form, it's not noticeably worse than lead -- and contrary to popular fiction, bullets are usually left in the body, because removing them will do more harm than leaving them will.
$endgroup$
– Zeiss Ikon
Apr 3 at 18:24
$begingroup$
Metallic mercury doesn't form soluble compounds easily. if the mercury isn't already in an organic compound form, it's not noticeably worse than lead -- and contrary to popular fiction, bullets are usually left in the body, because removing them will do more harm than leaving them will.
$endgroup$
– Zeiss Ikon
Apr 3 at 18:24
$begingroup$
@ZeissIkon Surely that seems counter-productive though? Would someone not get lead-poisioning by leaving that bullet inside their body for years? I know that sharp objects that enter the body are usually left in before being removed by medical professionals to prevent further bleeding. I’ve seen vets remove shotgun pellets from a dog before so i am unsure if a doctor would leave a bullet in a human, or at least if that is standard practice.
$endgroup$
– Liam Morris
Apr 3 at 18:35
$begingroup$
@ZeissIkon Surely that seems counter-productive though? Would someone not get lead-poisioning by leaving that bullet inside their body for years? I know that sharp objects that enter the body are usually left in before being removed by medical professionals to prevent further bleeding. I’ve seen vets remove shotgun pellets from a dog before so i am unsure if a doctor would leave a bullet in a human, or at least if that is standard practice.
$endgroup$
– Liam Morris
Apr 3 at 18:35
3
3
$begingroup$
The body "encysts" foreign objects in scar tissue, which insulates the lead bullet from body fluids. The only time bullets are routinely removed if if they're in a location where friction from movement will break down the cyst, or if they're in a location where there's risk of the bullet moving in a harmful way (in the brain, immediately by the spinal cord or aorta, for instance).
$endgroup$
– Zeiss Ikon
Apr 3 at 18:42
$begingroup$
The body "encysts" foreign objects in scar tissue, which insulates the lead bullet from body fluids. The only time bullets are routinely removed if if they're in a location where friction from movement will break down the cyst, or if they're in a location where there's risk of the bullet moving in a harmful way (in the brain, immediately by the spinal cord or aorta, for instance).
$endgroup$
– Zeiss Ikon
Apr 3 at 18:42
$begingroup$
@ZeissIkon Oh right, i did not know this. I thought that, just by being in the body, the lead would permeate through the skin and cause lead poisoning that way. I would also assume that, if it were possible to easily remove the bullet (such as if it was not burried too deep) a doctor would prefer to do that than leave it in.
$endgroup$
– Liam Morris
Apr 3 at 19:45
$begingroup$
@ZeissIkon Oh right, i did not know this. I thought that, just by being in the body, the lead would permeate through the skin and cause lead poisoning that way. I would also assume that, if it were possible to easily remove the bullet (such as if it was not burried too deep) a doctor would prefer to do that than leave it in.
$endgroup$
– Liam Morris
Apr 3 at 19:45
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Lead is already poisonous, the addition of mercury might be unnecessary if looking to increase the poisoning potential of a bullet. Instead, I would consider using toxin from poison dart frogs in the bullets.
This toxin is highly lethal to most creatures, including humans, and was used by aboriginal tribes in the rain forest. They coated darts with this poison (likely where the frogs got their name from) and used a blowgun to inject a person with it.
You could employ a similar mechanism with your bullets, either coating them in poison or putting the poison into a specialised bullet meant for storing the liquid and releasing it upon impact. If you really wanted to use mercury though, you could fill the bullet with that instead.
edited Apr 3 at 19:19
Brythan
20.9k74286
answered Apr 3 at 18:28
Liam MorrisLiam Morris
961216
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Botulism toxin is a good poison to use
$endgroup$
– Sonvar
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Lead is already poisonous, the addition of mercury might be unnecessary if looking to increase the poisoning potential of a bullet. Instead, I would consider using toxin from poison dart frogs in the bullets.
This toxin is highly lethal to most creatures, including humans, and was used by aboriginal tribes in the rain forest. They coated darts with this poison (likely where the frogs got their name from) and used a blowgun to inject a person with it.
You could employ a similar mechanism with your bullets, either coating them in poison or putting the poison into a specialised bullet meant for storing the liquid and releasing it upon impact. If you really wanted to use mercury though, you could fill the bullet with that instead.
edited Apr 3 at 19:19
Brythan
20.9k74286
answered Apr 3 at 18:28
Liam MorrisLiam Morris
961216
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Botulism toxin is a good poison to use
$endgroup$
– Sonvar
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Lead is already poisonous, the addition of mercury might be unnecessary if looking to increase the poisoning potential of a bullet. Instead, I would consider using toxin from poison dart frogs in the bullets.
This toxin is highly lethal to most creatures, including humans, and was used by aboriginal tribes in the rain forest. They coated darts with this poison (likely where the frogs got their name from) and used a blowgun to inject a person with it.
You could employ a similar mechanism with your bullets, either coating them in poison or putting the poison into a specialised bullet meant for storing the liquid and releasing it upon impact. If you really wanted to use mercury though, you could fill the bullet with that instead.
edited Apr 3 at 19:19
Brythan
20.9k74286
answered Apr 3 at 18:28
Liam MorrisLiam Morris
961216
$endgroup$
Lead is already poisonous, the addition of mercury might be unnecessary if looking to increase the poisoning potential of a bullet. Instead, I would consider using toxin from poison dart frogs in the bullets.
This toxin is highly lethal to most creatures, including humans, and was used by aboriginal tribes in the rain forest. They coated darts with this poison (likely where the frogs got their name from) and used a blowgun to inject a person with it.
You could employ a similar mechanism with your bullets, either coating them in poison or putting the poison into a specialised bullet meant for storing the liquid and releasing it upon impact. If you really wanted to use mercury though, you could fill the bullet with that instead.
edited Apr 3 at 19:19
Brythan
20.9k74286
answered Apr 3 at 18:28
Liam MorrisLiam Morris
961216
edited Apr 3 at 19:19
Brythan
20.9k74286
edited Apr 3 at 19:19
Brythan
20.9k74286
edited Apr 3 at 19:19
Brythan
20.9k74286
20.9k74286
answered Apr 3 at 18:28
Liam MorrisLiam Morris
961216
answered Apr 3 at 18:28
Liam MorrisLiam Morris
961216
answered Apr 3 at 18:28
Liam MorrisLiam Morris
961216
961216
$begingroup$
Botulism toxin is a good poison to use
$endgroup$
– Sonvar
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Botulism toxin is a good poison to use
$endgroup$
– Sonvar
yesterday
$begingroup$
Botulism toxin is a good poison to use
$endgroup$
– Sonvar
yesterday
$begingroup$
Botulism toxin is a good poison to use
$endgroup$
– Sonvar
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
As others have said mercury as a poison is just not practical. What might be possible is to use mercury embrittlement to damage vehicles.
video of embrittlement
Now I'm not sure how plausible it is to e.g. hit an aircraft with a mercury bullet, but if you can then mercury embrittlement process should allow the mercury to migrate through the aircraft aluminum structures and considerably weaken them. i.e. it might be able to make an otherwise nonlethal shot to an aircraft lethal
answered 2 days ago
jk.jk.
19815
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
As others have said mercury as a poison is just not practical. What might be possible is to use mercury embrittlement to damage vehicles.
video of embrittlement
Now I'm not sure how plausible it is to e.g. hit an aircraft with a mercury bullet, but if you can then mercury embrittlement process should allow the mercury to migrate through the aircraft aluminum structures and considerably weaken them. i.e. it might be able to make an otherwise nonlethal shot to an aircraft lethal
answered 2 days ago
jk.jk.
19815
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
As others have said mercury as a poison is just not practical. What might be possible is to use mercury embrittlement to damage vehicles.
video of embrittlement
Now I'm not sure how plausible it is to e.g. hit an aircraft with a mercury bullet, but if you can then mercury embrittlement process should allow the mercury to migrate through the aircraft aluminum structures and considerably weaken them. i.e. it might be able to make an otherwise nonlethal shot to an aircraft lethal
answered 2 days ago
jk.jk.
19815
$endgroup$
As others have said mercury as a poison is just not practical. What might be possible is to use mercury embrittlement to damage vehicles.
video of embrittlement
Now I'm not sure how plausible it is to e.g. hit an aircraft with a mercury bullet, but if you can then mercury embrittlement process should allow the mercury to migrate through the aircraft aluminum structures and considerably weaken them. i.e. it might be able to make an otherwise nonlethal shot to an aircraft lethal
answered 2 days ago
jk.jk.
19815
edited yesterday
answered 2 days ago
jk.jk.
19815
answered 2 days ago
jk.jk.
19815
answered 2 days ago
jk.jk.
19815
19815
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
No.
If you dip you bullet in mercury, it will run off. Even if some adheres (and it doesn-t - have you seen mercury?) it will be lost in the high-temperatures following firing.
Even if some does miraculously make it into the victim's body, traces of metallic mercury are not going to cause a health issue.
Suggest you pick something genuinely dangerous, eg saxatoxin or one of the others used by the CIA etc
answered yesterday
David HamblingDavid Hambling
693
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
No.
If you dip you bullet in mercury, it will run off. Even if some adheres (and it doesn-t - have you seen mercury?) it will be lost in the high-temperatures following firing.
Even if some does miraculously make it into the victim's body, traces of metallic mercury are not going to cause a health issue.
Suggest you pick something genuinely dangerous, eg saxatoxin or one of the others used by the CIA etc
answered yesterday
David HamblingDavid Hambling
693
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
No.
If you dip you bullet in mercury, it will run off. Even if some adheres (and it doesn-t - have you seen mercury?) it will be lost in the high-temperatures following firing.
Even if some does miraculously make it into the victim's body, traces of metallic mercury are not going to cause a health issue.
Suggest you pick something genuinely dangerous, eg saxatoxin or one of the others used by the CIA etc
answered yesterday
David HamblingDavid Hambling
693
$endgroup$
No.
If you dip you bullet in mercury, it will run off. Even if some adheres (and it doesn-t - have you seen mercury?) it will be lost in the high-temperatures following firing.
Even if some does miraculously make it into the victim's body, traces of metallic mercury are not going to cause a health issue.
Suggest you pick something genuinely dangerous, eg saxatoxin or one of the others used by the CIA etc
answered yesterday
David HamblingDavid Hambling
693
answered yesterday
David HamblingDavid Hambling
693
answered yesterday
David HamblingDavid Hambling
693
answered yesterday
David HamblingDavid Hambling
693
693
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Worldbuilding Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f143138%2fassassins-bullet-with-mercury%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
64
$begingroup$
Yay, we just got moved up the FBI, CIA, etc. watchlists again.
$endgroup$
– Gryphon
Apr 3 at 17:34
7
$begingroup$
quora.com/Will-adding-mercury-to-bullets-increase-the-fatality
$endgroup$
– nzaman
Apr 3 at 17:35
7
$begingroup$
Mercury bullets are stupid. Turns out though, that sodium and potassium bullets are awesome: youtube.com/watch?v=T85d7ST2yxU
$endgroup$
– Starfish Prime
Apr 3 at 18:49
6
$begingroup$
As many have indicated, no. Mercury is actually a slow killer. Have you ever heard the phrase, "mad as a hatter?" It came from the 1700s when hat makers in Europe used mercury during the hat making process and long-term exposure made people bonkers - and sometimes killed them. But it takes regular exposure for a long time to do that. Fish are harvested with mercury in them - alive, not dead. Mercury poisoning is a problem, but the environmental hype exceeds Mercury's abilities. Now, a hollow-tip like Zeiss suggests with a Curare core.... That would work.
$endgroup$
– JBH
Apr 3 at 20:17
8
$begingroup$
@Sievert The lethality to whichever poor sod has to load the things, yes.
$endgroup$
– Cadence
Apr 3 at 20:58