which one should I use in this sentence [on hold]
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}
I am interested to find out between for and to.
Which sentence is correct?
It is the most expensive sweater for me.
It is the most expensive sweater to me.
grammar
New contributor
put on hold as off-topic by J.R., tchrist♦ Apr 3 at 23:09
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic." – tchrist
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
add a comment |
I am interested to find out between for and to.
Which sentence is correct?
It is the most expensive sweater for me.
It is the most expensive sweater to me.
grammar
New contributor
put on hold as off-topic by J.R., tchrist♦ Apr 3 at 23:09
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic." – tchrist
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
Oh, I didn't know that. Thank you.
– elin
2 days ago
To would mean that you know of. To me, that one-million-dollar sweater is the most expensive. While for would mean the most expensive of those sweaters meant for you to wear. Because that one-million-dollar sweater is likely not meant for you at all—but for somebody crazily wealthy.
– Jason Bassford
yesterday
add a comment |
I am interested to find out between for and to.
Which sentence is correct?
It is the most expensive sweater for me.
It is the most expensive sweater to me.
grammar
New contributor
I am interested to find out between for and to.
Which sentence is correct?
It is the most expensive sweater for me.
It is the most expensive sweater to me.
grammar
grammar
New contributor
New contributor
edited Apr 3 at 21:20
J.R.
55.3k584183
55.3k584183
New contributor
asked Apr 3 at 20:12
elinelin
6
6
New contributor
New contributor
put on hold as off-topic by J.R., tchrist♦ Apr 3 at 23:09
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic." – tchrist
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
put on hold as off-topic by J.R., tchrist♦ Apr 3 at 23:09
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic." – tchrist
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
Oh, I didn't know that. Thank you.
– elin
2 days ago
To would mean that you know of. To me, that one-million-dollar sweater is the most expensive. While for would mean the most expensive of those sweaters meant for you to wear. Because that one-million-dollar sweater is likely not meant for you at all—but for somebody crazily wealthy.
– Jason Bassford
yesterday
add a comment |
Oh, I didn't know that. Thank you.
– elin
2 days ago
To would mean that you know of. To me, that one-million-dollar sweater is the most expensive. While for would mean the most expensive of those sweaters meant for you to wear. Because that one-million-dollar sweater is likely not meant for you at all—but for somebody crazily wealthy.
– Jason Bassford
yesterday
Oh, I didn't know that. Thank you.
– elin
2 days ago
Oh, I didn't know that. Thank you.
– elin
2 days ago
To would mean that you know of. To me, that one-million-dollar sweater is the most expensive. While for would mean the most expensive of those sweaters meant for you to wear. Because that one-million-dollar sweater is likely not meant for you at all—but for somebody crazily wealthy.
– Jason Bassford
yesterday
To would mean that you know of. To me, that one-million-dollar sweater is the most expensive. While for would mean the most expensive of those sweaters meant for you to wear. Because that one-million-dollar sweater is likely not meant for you at all—but for somebody crazily wealthy.
– Jason Bassford
yesterday
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
"to me" would be very odd. "for me" sounds much better, but I don't really understand the sentence. Surely if a sweater is the most expensive for me, it's the most expensive for anyone? Sweaters aren't (usually) priced differently for different buyers.
I wonder if you mean, "This is the most expensive sweater that I can afford." If so, I think it's clearer to use this form of words than the original.
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
"to me" would be very odd. "for me" sounds much better, but I don't really understand the sentence. Surely if a sweater is the most expensive for me, it's the most expensive for anyone? Sweaters aren't (usually) priced differently for different buyers.
I wonder if you mean, "This is the most expensive sweater that I can afford." If so, I think it's clearer to use this form of words than the original.
add a comment |
"to me" would be very odd. "for me" sounds much better, but I don't really understand the sentence. Surely if a sweater is the most expensive for me, it's the most expensive for anyone? Sweaters aren't (usually) priced differently for different buyers.
I wonder if you mean, "This is the most expensive sweater that I can afford." If so, I think it's clearer to use this form of words than the original.
add a comment |
"to me" would be very odd. "for me" sounds much better, but I don't really understand the sentence. Surely if a sweater is the most expensive for me, it's the most expensive for anyone? Sweaters aren't (usually) priced differently for different buyers.
I wonder if you mean, "This is the most expensive sweater that I can afford." If so, I think it's clearer to use this form of words than the original.
"to me" would be very odd. "for me" sounds much better, but I don't really understand the sentence. Surely if a sweater is the most expensive for me, it's the most expensive for anyone? Sweaters aren't (usually) priced differently for different buyers.
I wonder if you mean, "This is the most expensive sweater that I can afford." If so, I think it's clearer to use this form of words than the original.
edited Apr 3 at 21:46
answered Apr 3 at 21:10
Philip WoodPhilip Wood
3156
3156
add a comment |
add a comment |
Oh, I didn't know that. Thank you.
– elin
2 days ago
To would mean that you know of. To me, that one-million-dollar sweater is the most expensive. While for would mean the most expensive of those sweaters meant for you to wear. Because that one-million-dollar sweater is likely not meant for you at all—but for somebody crazily wealthy.
– Jason Bassford
yesterday