Codimension of non-flat locus












3












$begingroup$


Let $X$, $Y$ be integral separated schemes of finite type over $mathbb{C}$, $Y$ be normal, $f:Xrightarrow Y$ be a surjective morphism of schemes. Can the non-flat locus of $f$ be non-empty and have codimension $geq 2$ in $X$?










share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




Stepan Banach is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$

















    3












    $begingroup$


    Let $X$, $Y$ be integral separated schemes of finite type over $mathbb{C}$, $Y$ be normal, $f:Xrightarrow Y$ be a surjective morphism of schemes. Can the non-flat locus of $f$ be non-empty and have codimension $geq 2$ in $X$?










    share|cite|improve this question







    New contributor




    Stepan Banach is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.







    $endgroup$















      3












      3








      3





      $begingroup$


      Let $X$, $Y$ be integral separated schemes of finite type over $mathbb{C}$, $Y$ be normal, $f:Xrightarrow Y$ be a surjective morphism of schemes. Can the non-flat locus of $f$ be non-empty and have codimension $geq 2$ in $X$?










      share|cite|improve this question







      New contributor




      Stepan Banach is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.







      $endgroup$




      Let $X$, $Y$ be integral separated schemes of finite type over $mathbb{C}$, $Y$ be normal, $f:Xrightarrow Y$ be a surjective morphism of schemes. Can the non-flat locus of $f$ be non-empty and have codimension $geq 2$ in $X$?







      ag.algebraic-geometry






      share|cite|improve this question







      New contributor




      Stepan Banach is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|cite|improve this question







      New contributor




      Stepan Banach is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question






      New contributor




      Stepan Banach is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked Apr 5 at 15:44









      Stepan BanachStepan Banach

      1337




      1337




      New contributor




      Stepan Banach is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      Stepan Banach is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      Stepan Banach is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






















          4 Answers
          4






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          5












          $begingroup$

          Let $Y$ be a cone over a smooth projective variety which is a product and projectively normal (so $Y$ is normal). For example let $Y$ be the cone over $mathbb P^1times mathbb P^1subseteq mathbb P^3$. In general, say $Y$ is a cone over $Vtimes W$.



          Next let $Hsubseteq W$ be an effective Cartier divisor (In the $mathbb P^1times mathbb P^1$ example, $H$ is simply a point) and let $H'=Vtimes H$. Finally, let
          $f:Xto Y$ be the blow up of $Y$ along its subscheme $Z$ which is the cone over $H'$. Then $f$ is an isomorphism (and hence flat) outside $Z$. Since $Z$ is a Weil divisor, which is Cartier except at the vertex, $f$ is a small morphism, so it is an isom outside a codimension $2$ subset.



          Addendum:
          Here is an example with $Y$ smooth. Start with the above example with $V=mathbb P^1$ and $W=mathbb P^n$ with $n>1$ and $Vtimes W$ embedded with the Segre embedding. Construct the same (and for the sake of avoiding confusion, let's denote it differently) $f_0:X_0to Y_0$ and let $vin Y_0$ denote the vertex of the cone. Then a relatively simple computation shows that then $f^{-1}(v)simeq V=mathbb P^1$ (for the actual computation see Prop 3.3 of this paper. Note that this means that the exceptional set of $f$ is $1$-dimensional. Another simple calculation shows that $X_0$ is smooth (this is where the choice of $V$, $W$ and the embedding matters).



          Now let $f:Xcolon =X_0times _{Y_0}X_0to Ycolon=X_0$. Then $f:Xto Y$ is birational (because of the dimensions there is only one component) and it's exceptional set (on $X$) is $2$-dimensional. From the construction and by the assumption that $n>1$ we obtain that $dim X=dim X_0= n+2>3$. Hence $f$ is an isomorphism (in particular, flat) outside a codimension $2$ subset of $X$ (but it is obviously not flat along the exceptional set).






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            what happens if $Y$ is smooth?
            $endgroup$
            – Stepan Banach
            Apr 5 at 18:03










          • $begingroup$
            @StepanBanach: I added an example where $Y$ is smooth
            $endgroup$
            – Sándor Kovács
            yesterday










          • $begingroup$
            The second example ($X$ and $Y$ smooth, $f$ iso away from a curve in $X$) seems to contradict van den Waerden's theorem. What am I missing?
            $endgroup$
            – Piotr Achinger
            yesterday










          • $begingroup$
            @PiotrAchinger: I didn't claim that $X$ was smooth.
            $endgroup$
            – Sándor Kovács
            yesterday








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            if I understand correctly, for a surjective birational morphism between connected smooth schemes of finite type over $mathbb{C}$, the non-flat locus can not be non-empty of codimension $geq 2$. Is it true that the non-flat locus of a surjective morphism between connected smooth schemes of finite type over $mathbb{C}$ can not be non-empty of codimension $geq 2$?
            $endgroup$
            – Aknazar Kazhymurat
            yesterday



















          5












          $begingroup$

          Let $n ge 2$, $X = mathbb{A}^n$, $Y = mathbb{A}^n/{pm 1}$ and $f colon X to Y$ the quotient morphism. The non-flat locus of $f$ is the point $f(0) in Y$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$





















            4












            $begingroup$

            Yes. Let $Y$ be $mathrm{Spec} k[w,x,y,z]/(wz-xy)$. Let $X$ be $mathrm{Proj} k[w,x,y,z, s,t]/(wz-xy, wt-xs, yt-zs)$ where $w$, $x$, $y$ and $z$ are in degree $0$ and $s$ and $t$ are in degree $1$. Then $Y$ is three dimensional with a singularity at $w=x=y=z=0$. The map $X to Y$ is a resolution of this singularity; it is an ismorphism (and hence flat) away from the singularity and the fiber over the singularity is $mathbb{P}^1$, so the nonflat locus is $1$-dimensional inside the $3$-fold $X$.



            This is a special case Sándor Kovács example, namely, it is what happens when you blow up the cone on $mathbb{P}^1 times (mathrm{point})$ inside the cone on $mathbb{P}^1 times mathbb{P}^1$.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$





















              1












              $begingroup$

              Try $Y=mathrm{Spec},mathbb{C}[x^4, x^3y, xy^3, y^4]$ and $X$ its normalization.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$









              • 3




                $begingroup$
                isn't the normalization of a normal scheme the identity morphism (whose non-flat locus is empty)?
                $endgroup$
                – Stepan Banach
                Apr 5 at 17:21






              • 1




                $begingroup$
                @StepanBanach You did not mention normal in your question.
                $endgroup$
                – Mohan
                Apr 5 at 18:28












              Your Answer





              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
              return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
              StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
              StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
              });
              });
              }, "mathjax-editing");

              StackExchange.ready(function() {
              var channelOptions = {
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "504"
              };
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
              createEditor();
              });
              }
              else {
              createEditor();
              }
              });

              function createEditor() {
              StackExchange.prepareEditor({
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: true,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: 10,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader: {
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              },
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              });


              }
              });






              Stepan Banach is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function () {
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f327249%2fcodimension-of-non-flat-locus%23new-answer', 'question_page');
              }
              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              4 Answers
              4






              active

              oldest

              votes








              4 Answers
              4






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              5












              $begingroup$

              Let $Y$ be a cone over a smooth projective variety which is a product and projectively normal (so $Y$ is normal). For example let $Y$ be the cone over $mathbb P^1times mathbb P^1subseteq mathbb P^3$. In general, say $Y$ is a cone over $Vtimes W$.



              Next let $Hsubseteq W$ be an effective Cartier divisor (In the $mathbb P^1times mathbb P^1$ example, $H$ is simply a point) and let $H'=Vtimes H$. Finally, let
              $f:Xto Y$ be the blow up of $Y$ along its subscheme $Z$ which is the cone over $H'$. Then $f$ is an isomorphism (and hence flat) outside $Z$. Since $Z$ is a Weil divisor, which is Cartier except at the vertex, $f$ is a small morphism, so it is an isom outside a codimension $2$ subset.



              Addendum:
              Here is an example with $Y$ smooth. Start with the above example with $V=mathbb P^1$ and $W=mathbb P^n$ with $n>1$ and $Vtimes W$ embedded with the Segre embedding. Construct the same (and for the sake of avoiding confusion, let's denote it differently) $f_0:X_0to Y_0$ and let $vin Y_0$ denote the vertex of the cone. Then a relatively simple computation shows that then $f^{-1}(v)simeq V=mathbb P^1$ (for the actual computation see Prop 3.3 of this paper. Note that this means that the exceptional set of $f$ is $1$-dimensional. Another simple calculation shows that $X_0$ is smooth (this is where the choice of $V$, $W$ and the embedding matters).



              Now let $f:Xcolon =X_0times _{Y_0}X_0to Ycolon=X_0$. Then $f:Xto Y$ is birational (because of the dimensions there is only one component) and it's exceptional set (on $X$) is $2$-dimensional. From the construction and by the assumption that $n>1$ we obtain that $dim X=dim X_0= n+2>3$. Hence $f$ is an isomorphism (in particular, flat) outside a codimension $2$ subset of $X$ (but it is obviously not flat along the exceptional set).






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$













              • $begingroup$
                what happens if $Y$ is smooth?
                $endgroup$
                – Stepan Banach
                Apr 5 at 18:03










              • $begingroup$
                @StepanBanach: I added an example where $Y$ is smooth
                $endgroup$
                – Sándor Kovács
                yesterday










              • $begingroup$
                The second example ($X$ and $Y$ smooth, $f$ iso away from a curve in $X$) seems to contradict van den Waerden's theorem. What am I missing?
                $endgroup$
                – Piotr Achinger
                yesterday










              • $begingroup$
                @PiotrAchinger: I didn't claim that $X$ was smooth.
                $endgroup$
                – Sándor Kovács
                yesterday








              • 1




                $begingroup$
                if I understand correctly, for a surjective birational morphism between connected smooth schemes of finite type over $mathbb{C}$, the non-flat locus can not be non-empty of codimension $geq 2$. Is it true that the non-flat locus of a surjective morphism between connected smooth schemes of finite type over $mathbb{C}$ can not be non-empty of codimension $geq 2$?
                $endgroup$
                – Aknazar Kazhymurat
                yesterday
















              5












              $begingroup$

              Let $Y$ be a cone over a smooth projective variety which is a product and projectively normal (so $Y$ is normal). For example let $Y$ be the cone over $mathbb P^1times mathbb P^1subseteq mathbb P^3$. In general, say $Y$ is a cone over $Vtimes W$.



              Next let $Hsubseteq W$ be an effective Cartier divisor (In the $mathbb P^1times mathbb P^1$ example, $H$ is simply a point) and let $H'=Vtimes H$. Finally, let
              $f:Xto Y$ be the blow up of $Y$ along its subscheme $Z$ which is the cone over $H'$. Then $f$ is an isomorphism (and hence flat) outside $Z$. Since $Z$ is a Weil divisor, which is Cartier except at the vertex, $f$ is a small morphism, so it is an isom outside a codimension $2$ subset.



              Addendum:
              Here is an example with $Y$ smooth. Start with the above example with $V=mathbb P^1$ and $W=mathbb P^n$ with $n>1$ and $Vtimes W$ embedded with the Segre embedding. Construct the same (and for the sake of avoiding confusion, let's denote it differently) $f_0:X_0to Y_0$ and let $vin Y_0$ denote the vertex of the cone. Then a relatively simple computation shows that then $f^{-1}(v)simeq V=mathbb P^1$ (for the actual computation see Prop 3.3 of this paper. Note that this means that the exceptional set of $f$ is $1$-dimensional. Another simple calculation shows that $X_0$ is smooth (this is where the choice of $V$, $W$ and the embedding matters).



              Now let $f:Xcolon =X_0times _{Y_0}X_0to Ycolon=X_0$. Then $f:Xto Y$ is birational (because of the dimensions there is only one component) and it's exceptional set (on $X$) is $2$-dimensional. From the construction and by the assumption that $n>1$ we obtain that $dim X=dim X_0= n+2>3$. Hence $f$ is an isomorphism (in particular, flat) outside a codimension $2$ subset of $X$ (but it is obviously not flat along the exceptional set).






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$













              • $begingroup$
                what happens if $Y$ is smooth?
                $endgroup$
                – Stepan Banach
                Apr 5 at 18:03










              • $begingroup$
                @StepanBanach: I added an example where $Y$ is smooth
                $endgroup$
                – Sándor Kovács
                yesterday










              • $begingroup$
                The second example ($X$ and $Y$ smooth, $f$ iso away from a curve in $X$) seems to contradict van den Waerden's theorem. What am I missing?
                $endgroup$
                – Piotr Achinger
                yesterday










              • $begingroup$
                @PiotrAchinger: I didn't claim that $X$ was smooth.
                $endgroup$
                – Sándor Kovács
                yesterday








              • 1




                $begingroup$
                if I understand correctly, for a surjective birational morphism between connected smooth schemes of finite type over $mathbb{C}$, the non-flat locus can not be non-empty of codimension $geq 2$. Is it true that the non-flat locus of a surjective morphism between connected smooth schemes of finite type over $mathbb{C}$ can not be non-empty of codimension $geq 2$?
                $endgroup$
                – Aknazar Kazhymurat
                yesterday














              5












              5








              5





              $begingroup$

              Let $Y$ be a cone over a smooth projective variety which is a product and projectively normal (so $Y$ is normal). For example let $Y$ be the cone over $mathbb P^1times mathbb P^1subseteq mathbb P^3$. In general, say $Y$ is a cone over $Vtimes W$.



              Next let $Hsubseteq W$ be an effective Cartier divisor (In the $mathbb P^1times mathbb P^1$ example, $H$ is simply a point) and let $H'=Vtimes H$. Finally, let
              $f:Xto Y$ be the blow up of $Y$ along its subscheme $Z$ which is the cone over $H'$. Then $f$ is an isomorphism (and hence flat) outside $Z$. Since $Z$ is a Weil divisor, which is Cartier except at the vertex, $f$ is a small morphism, so it is an isom outside a codimension $2$ subset.



              Addendum:
              Here is an example with $Y$ smooth. Start with the above example with $V=mathbb P^1$ and $W=mathbb P^n$ with $n>1$ and $Vtimes W$ embedded with the Segre embedding. Construct the same (and for the sake of avoiding confusion, let's denote it differently) $f_0:X_0to Y_0$ and let $vin Y_0$ denote the vertex of the cone. Then a relatively simple computation shows that then $f^{-1}(v)simeq V=mathbb P^1$ (for the actual computation see Prop 3.3 of this paper. Note that this means that the exceptional set of $f$ is $1$-dimensional. Another simple calculation shows that $X_0$ is smooth (this is where the choice of $V$, $W$ and the embedding matters).



              Now let $f:Xcolon =X_0times _{Y_0}X_0to Ycolon=X_0$. Then $f:Xto Y$ is birational (because of the dimensions there is only one component) and it's exceptional set (on $X$) is $2$-dimensional. From the construction and by the assumption that $n>1$ we obtain that $dim X=dim X_0= n+2>3$. Hence $f$ is an isomorphism (in particular, flat) outside a codimension $2$ subset of $X$ (but it is obviously not flat along the exceptional set).






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$



              Let $Y$ be a cone over a smooth projective variety which is a product and projectively normal (so $Y$ is normal). For example let $Y$ be the cone over $mathbb P^1times mathbb P^1subseteq mathbb P^3$. In general, say $Y$ is a cone over $Vtimes W$.



              Next let $Hsubseteq W$ be an effective Cartier divisor (In the $mathbb P^1times mathbb P^1$ example, $H$ is simply a point) and let $H'=Vtimes H$. Finally, let
              $f:Xto Y$ be the blow up of $Y$ along its subscheme $Z$ which is the cone over $H'$. Then $f$ is an isomorphism (and hence flat) outside $Z$. Since $Z$ is a Weil divisor, which is Cartier except at the vertex, $f$ is a small morphism, so it is an isom outside a codimension $2$ subset.



              Addendum:
              Here is an example with $Y$ smooth. Start with the above example with $V=mathbb P^1$ and $W=mathbb P^n$ with $n>1$ and $Vtimes W$ embedded with the Segre embedding. Construct the same (and for the sake of avoiding confusion, let's denote it differently) $f_0:X_0to Y_0$ and let $vin Y_0$ denote the vertex of the cone. Then a relatively simple computation shows that then $f^{-1}(v)simeq V=mathbb P^1$ (for the actual computation see Prop 3.3 of this paper. Note that this means that the exceptional set of $f$ is $1$-dimensional. Another simple calculation shows that $X_0$ is smooth (this is where the choice of $V$, $W$ and the embedding matters).



              Now let $f:Xcolon =X_0times _{Y_0}X_0to Ycolon=X_0$. Then $f:Xto Y$ is birational (because of the dimensions there is only one component) and it's exceptional set (on $X$) is $2$-dimensional. From the construction and by the assumption that $n>1$ we obtain that $dim X=dim X_0= n+2>3$. Hence $f$ is an isomorphism (in particular, flat) outside a codimension $2$ subset of $X$ (but it is obviously not flat along the exceptional set).







              share|cite|improve this answer














              share|cite|improve this answer



              share|cite|improve this answer








              edited yesterday

























              answered Apr 5 at 17:59









              Sándor KovácsSándor Kovács

              36.9k284127




              36.9k284127












              • $begingroup$
                what happens if $Y$ is smooth?
                $endgroup$
                – Stepan Banach
                Apr 5 at 18:03










              • $begingroup$
                @StepanBanach: I added an example where $Y$ is smooth
                $endgroup$
                – Sándor Kovács
                yesterday










              • $begingroup$
                The second example ($X$ and $Y$ smooth, $f$ iso away from a curve in $X$) seems to contradict van den Waerden's theorem. What am I missing?
                $endgroup$
                – Piotr Achinger
                yesterday










              • $begingroup$
                @PiotrAchinger: I didn't claim that $X$ was smooth.
                $endgroup$
                – Sándor Kovács
                yesterday








              • 1




                $begingroup$
                if I understand correctly, for a surjective birational morphism between connected smooth schemes of finite type over $mathbb{C}$, the non-flat locus can not be non-empty of codimension $geq 2$. Is it true that the non-flat locus of a surjective morphism between connected smooth schemes of finite type over $mathbb{C}$ can not be non-empty of codimension $geq 2$?
                $endgroup$
                – Aknazar Kazhymurat
                yesterday


















              • $begingroup$
                what happens if $Y$ is smooth?
                $endgroup$
                – Stepan Banach
                Apr 5 at 18:03










              • $begingroup$
                @StepanBanach: I added an example where $Y$ is smooth
                $endgroup$
                – Sándor Kovács
                yesterday










              • $begingroup$
                The second example ($X$ and $Y$ smooth, $f$ iso away from a curve in $X$) seems to contradict van den Waerden's theorem. What am I missing?
                $endgroup$
                – Piotr Achinger
                yesterday










              • $begingroup$
                @PiotrAchinger: I didn't claim that $X$ was smooth.
                $endgroup$
                – Sándor Kovács
                yesterday








              • 1




                $begingroup$
                if I understand correctly, for a surjective birational morphism between connected smooth schemes of finite type over $mathbb{C}$, the non-flat locus can not be non-empty of codimension $geq 2$. Is it true that the non-flat locus of a surjective morphism between connected smooth schemes of finite type over $mathbb{C}$ can not be non-empty of codimension $geq 2$?
                $endgroup$
                – Aknazar Kazhymurat
                yesterday
















              $begingroup$
              what happens if $Y$ is smooth?
              $endgroup$
              – Stepan Banach
              Apr 5 at 18:03




              $begingroup$
              what happens if $Y$ is smooth?
              $endgroup$
              – Stepan Banach
              Apr 5 at 18:03












              $begingroup$
              @StepanBanach: I added an example where $Y$ is smooth
              $endgroup$
              – Sándor Kovács
              yesterday




              $begingroup$
              @StepanBanach: I added an example where $Y$ is smooth
              $endgroup$
              – Sándor Kovács
              yesterday












              $begingroup$
              The second example ($X$ and $Y$ smooth, $f$ iso away from a curve in $X$) seems to contradict van den Waerden's theorem. What am I missing?
              $endgroup$
              – Piotr Achinger
              yesterday




              $begingroup$
              The second example ($X$ and $Y$ smooth, $f$ iso away from a curve in $X$) seems to contradict van den Waerden's theorem. What am I missing?
              $endgroup$
              – Piotr Achinger
              yesterday












              $begingroup$
              @PiotrAchinger: I didn't claim that $X$ was smooth.
              $endgroup$
              – Sándor Kovács
              yesterday






              $begingroup$
              @PiotrAchinger: I didn't claim that $X$ was smooth.
              $endgroup$
              – Sándor Kovács
              yesterday






              1




              1




              $begingroup$
              if I understand correctly, for a surjective birational morphism between connected smooth schemes of finite type over $mathbb{C}$, the non-flat locus can not be non-empty of codimension $geq 2$. Is it true that the non-flat locus of a surjective morphism between connected smooth schemes of finite type over $mathbb{C}$ can not be non-empty of codimension $geq 2$?
              $endgroup$
              – Aknazar Kazhymurat
              yesterday




              $begingroup$
              if I understand correctly, for a surjective birational morphism between connected smooth schemes of finite type over $mathbb{C}$, the non-flat locus can not be non-empty of codimension $geq 2$. Is it true that the non-flat locus of a surjective morphism between connected smooth schemes of finite type over $mathbb{C}$ can not be non-empty of codimension $geq 2$?
              $endgroup$
              – Aknazar Kazhymurat
              yesterday











              5












              $begingroup$

              Let $n ge 2$, $X = mathbb{A}^n$, $Y = mathbb{A}^n/{pm 1}$ and $f colon X to Y$ the quotient morphism. The non-flat locus of $f$ is the point $f(0) in Y$.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$


















                5












                $begingroup$

                Let $n ge 2$, $X = mathbb{A}^n$, $Y = mathbb{A}^n/{pm 1}$ and $f colon X to Y$ the quotient morphism. The non-flat locus of $f$ is the point $f(0) in Y$.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$
















                  5












                  5








                  5





                  $begingroup$

                  Let $n ge 2$, $X = mathbb{A}^n$, $Y = mathbb{A}^n/{pm 1}$ and $f colon X to Y$ the quotient morphism. The non-flat locus of $f$ is the point $f(0) in Y$.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  Let $n ge 2$, $X = mathbb{A}^n$, $Y = mathbb{A}^n/{pm 1}$ and $f colon X to Y$ the quotient morphism. The non-flat locus of $f$ is the point $f(0) in Y$.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Apr 5 at 18:49









                  SashaSasha

                  21.3k22756




                  21.3k22756























                      4












                      $begingroup$

                      Yes. Let $Y$ be $mathrm{Spec} k[w,x,y,z]/(wz-xy)$. Let $X$ be $mathrm{Proj} k[w,x,y,z, s,t]/(wz-xy, wt-xs, yt-zs)$ where $w$, $x$, $y$ and $z$ are in degree $0$ and $s$ and $t$ are in degree $1$. Then $Y$ is three dimensional with a singularity at $w=x=y=z=0$. The map $X to Y$ is a resolution of this singularity; it is an ismorphism (and hence flat) away from the singularity and the fiber over the singularity is $mathbb{P}^1$, so the nonflat locus is $1$-dimensional inside the $3$-fold $X$.



                      This is a special case Sándor Kovács example, namely, it is what happens when you blow up the cone on $mathbb{P}^1 times (mathrm{point})$ inside the cone on $mathbb{P}^1 times mathbb{P}^1$.






                      share|cite|improve this answer











                      $endgroup$


















                        4












                        $begingroup$

                        Yes. Let $Y$ be $mathrm{Spec} k[w,x,y,z]/(wz-xy)$. Let $X$ be $mathrm{Proj} k[w,x,y,z, s,t]/(wz-xy, wt-xs, yt-zs)$ where $w$, $x$, $y$ and $z$ are in degree $0$ and $s$ and $t$ are in degree $1$. Then $Y$ is three dimensional with a singularity at $w=x=y=z=0$. The map $X to Y$ is a resolution of this singularity; it is an ismorphism (and hence flat) away from the singularity and the fiber over the singularity is $mathbb{P}^1$, so the nonflat locus is $1$-dimensional inside the $3$-fold $X$.



                        This is a special case Sándor Kovács example, namely, it is what happens when you blow up the cone on $mathbb{P}^1 times (mathrm{point})$ inside the cone on $mathbb{P}^1 times mathbb{P}^1$.






                        share|cite|improve this answer











                        $endgroup$
















                          4












                          4








                          4





                          $begingroup$

                          Yes. Let $Y$ be $mathrm{Spec} k[w,x,y,z]/(wz-xy)$. Let $X$ be $mathrm{Proj} k[w,x,y,z, s,t]/(wz-xy, wt-xs, yt-zs)$ where $w$, $x$, $y$ and $z$ are in degree $0$ and $s$ and $t$ are in degree $1$. Then $Y$ is three dimensional with a singularity at $w=x=y=z=0$. The map $X to Y$ is a resolution of this singularity; it is an ismorphism (and hence flat) away from the singularity and the fiber over the singularity is $mathbb{P}^1$, so the nonflat locus is $1$-dimensional inside the $3$-fold $X$.



                          This is a special case Sándor Kovács example, namely, it is what happens when you blow up the cone on $mathbb{P}^1 times (mathrm{point})$ inside the cone on $mathbb{P}^1 times mathbb{P}^1$.






                          share|cite|improve this answer











                          $endgroup$



                          Yes. Let $Y$ be $mathrm{Spec} k[w,x,y,z]/(wz-xy)$. Let $X$ be $mathrm{Proj} k[w,x,y,z, s,t]/(wz-xy, wt-xs, yt-zs)$ where $w$, $x$, $y$ and $z$ are in degree $0$ and $s$ and $t$ are in degree $1$. Then $Y$ is three dimensional with a singularity at $w=x=y=z=0$. The map $X to Y$ is a resolution of this singularity; it is an ismorphism (and hence flat) away from the singularity and the fiber over the singularity is $mathbb{P}^1$, so the nonflat locus is $1$-dimensional inside the $3$-fold $X$.



                          This is a special case Sándor Kovács example, namely, it is what happens when you blow up the cone on $mathbb{P}^1 times (mathrm{point})$ inside the cone on $mathbb{P}^1 times mathbb{P}^1$.







                          share|cite|improve this answer














                          share|cite|improve this answer



                          share|cite|improve this answer








                          edited Apr 5 at 18:02

























                          answered Apr 5 at 17:55









                          David E SpeyerDavid E Speyer

                          108k9282540




                          108k9282540























                              1












                              $begingroup$

                              Try $Y=mathrm{Spec},mathbb{C}[x^4, x^3y, xy^3, y^4]$ and $X$ its normalization.






                              share|cite|improve this answer









                              $endgroup$









                              • 3




                                $begingroup$
                                isn't the normalization of a normal scheme the identity morphism (whose non-flat locus is empty)?
                                $endgroup$
                                – Stepan Banach
                                Apr 5 at 17:21






                              • 1




                                $begingroup$
                                @StepanBanach You did not mention normal in your question.
                                $endgroup$
                                – Mohan
                                Apr 5 at 18:28
















                              1












                              $begingroup$

                              Try $Y=mathrm{Spec},mathbb{C}[x^4, x^3y, xy^3, y^4]$ and $X$ its normalization.






                              share|cite|improve this answer









                              $endgroup$









                              • 3




                                $begingroup$
                                isn't the normalization of a normal scheme the identity morphism (whose non-flat locus is empty)?
                                $endgroup$
                                – Stepan Banach
                                Apr 5 at 17:21






                              • 1




                                $begingroup$
                                @StepanBanach You did not mention normal in your question.
                                $endgroup$
                                – Mohan
                                Apr 5 at 18:28














                              1












                              1








                              1





                              $begingroup$

                              Try $Y=mathrm{Spec},mathbb{C}[x^4, x^3y, xy^3, y^4]$ and $X$ its normalization.






                              share|cite|improve this answer









                              $endgroup$



                              Try $Y=mathrm{Spec},mathbb{C}[x^4, x^3y, xy^3, y^4]$ and $X$ its normalization.







                              share|cite|improve this answer












                              share|cite|improve this answer



                              share|cite|improve this answer










                              answered Apr 5 at 17:13









                              MohanMohan

                              3,45411312




                              3,45411312








                              • 3




                                $begingroup$
                                isn't the normalization of a normal scheme the identity morphism (whose non-flat locus is empty)?
                                $endgroup$
                                – Stepan Banach
                                Apr 5 at 17:21






                              • 1




                                $begingroup$
                                @StepanBanach You did not mention normal in your question.
                                $endgroup$
                                – Mohan
                                Apr 5 at 18:28














                              • 3




                                $begingroup$
                                isn't the normalization of a normal scheme the identity morphism (whose non-flat locus is empty)?
                                $endgroup$
                                – Stepan Banach
                                Apr 5 at 17:21






                              • 1




                                $begingroup$
                                @StepanBanach You did not mention normal in your question.
                                $endgroup$
                                – Mohan
                                Apr 5 at 18:28








                              3




                              3




                              $begingroup$
                              isn't the normalization of a normal scheme the identity morphism (whose non-flat locus is empty)?
                              $endgroup$
                              – Stepan Banach
                              Apr 5 at 17:21




                              $begingroup$
                              isn't the normalization of a normal scheme the identity morphism (whose non-flat locus is empty)?
                              $endgroup$
                              – Stepan Banach
                              Apr 5 at 17:21




                              1




                              1




                              $begingroup$
                              @StepanBanach You did not mention normal in your question.
                              $endgroup$
                              – Mohan
                              Apr 5 at 18:28




                              $begingroup$
                              @StepanBanach You did not mention normal in your question.
                              $endgroup$
                              – Mohan
                              Apr 5 at 18:28










                              Stepan Banach is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










                              draft saved

                              draft discarded


















                              Stepan Banach is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













                              Stepan Banach is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                              Stepan Banach is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















                              Thanks for contributing an answer to MathOverflow!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid



                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                              Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function () {
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f327249%2fcodimension-of-non-flat-locus%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                              }
                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Category:香港粉麵

                              List *all* the tuples!

                              Channel [V]