How can I be more frugal with salt when cooking (dried) pasta?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
When cooking pasta (from dried), I currently need to add a significant amount of salt to the water to add flavour.
As the pasta itself is extremely cheap, and the water is completely free - it can at times feel like throwing money down the drain as the majority of the salty water is discarded.
Are there any effective ways to reduce the amount of salt wasted during cooking, without simply undersalting the pasta? (e.g. adding salt after the pasta has been mostly drained)
Additional notes:
I'm open to making fresh pasta by hand, if salt can be added at this stage rather than in the water
The cost of salt should be considered a constant, that is - suggesting a cheaper salt is not valid.
Taste/texture quality should be maintained as best as possible.
Reusing the salted water is not acceptable, due to space constraints.
salt budget-cooking
|
show 4 more comments
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
When cooking pasta (from dried), I currently need to add a significant amount of salt to the water to add flavour.
As the pasta itself is extremely cheap, and the water is completely free - it can at times feel like throwing money down the drain as the majority of the salty water is discarded.
Are there any effective ways to reduce the amount of salt wasted during cooking, without simply undersalting the pasta? (e.g. adding salt after the pasta has been mostly drained)
Additional notes:
I'm open to making fresh pasta by hand, if salt can be added at this stage rather than in the water
The cost of salt should be considered a constant, that is - suggesting a cheaper salt is not valid.
Taste/texture quality should be maintained as best as possible.
Reusing the salted water is not acceptable, due to space constraints.
salt budget-cooking
14
What kind of salt are you using? Where I live, salt is around $0.30/lbs. If you're obsessed with using super-expensive flake sea salt, then you should be prepared to pay for it.
– FuzzyChef
11 hours ago
22
I suspect that the water and the heat is costing you more than the salt.
– FuzzyChef
10 hours ago
5
Salt is extremely cheap. Why not use less salt in the water and more salt in the sauce?
– Chloe
8 hours ago
8
@Bilkokuya: Phrases equally worth bearing in mind are “penny wise, pound foolish” and “time is money”. Even if you currently use a whole tablespoon of salt (a pretty vast amount), that’s about 18g, which at the 50p/lb price you cost is under 2p. Save that every day for a year, you’ve saved £7.50… the UK minimum hourly wage for an hour. More realistically if you were using a couple of teaspoonsful and doing this a few times a week, you’ll save max a couple of pounds over the year — 15 minutes’ work at minimum wage. Have you spent more than 15 minutes on this question?
– PLL
7 hours ago
4
@PLL - Table salt at my local store is about 40p for nearly a kilo. That's enough to salt a thousand pasta dishes to beyond the point that they're edible for about 0p per serving.
– Richard
6 hours ago
|
show 4 more comments
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
When cooking pasta (from dried), I currently need to add a significant amount of salt to the water to add flavour.
As the pasta itself is extremely cheap, and the water is completely free - it can at times feel like throwing money down the drain as the majority of the salty water is discarded.
Are there any effective ways to reduce the amount of salt wasted during cooking, without simply undersalting the pasta? (e.g. adding salt after the pasta has been mostly drained)
Additional notes:
I'm open to making fresh pasta by hand, if salt can be added at this stage rather than in the water
The cost of salt should be considered a constant, that is - suggesting a cheaper salt is not valid.
Taste/texture quality should be maintained as best as possible.
Reusing the salted water is not acceptable, due to space constraints.
salt budget-cooking
When cooking pasta (from dried), I currently need to add a significant amount of salt to the water to add flavour.
As the pasta itself is extremely cheap, and the water is completely free - it can at times feel like throwing money down the drain as the majority of the salty water is discarded.
Are there any effective ways to reduce the amount of salt wasted during cooking, without simply undersalting the pasta? (e.g. adding salt after the pasta has been mostly drained)
Additional notes:
I'm open to making fresh pasta by hand, if salt can be added at this stage rather than in the water
The cost of salt should be considered a constant, that is - suggesting a cheaper salt is not valid.
Taste/texture quality should be maintained as best as possible.
Reusing the salted water is not acceptable, due to space constraints.
salt budget-cooking
salt budget-cooking
asked 12 hours ago
Bilkokuya
1325
1325
14
What kind of salt are you using? Where I live, salt is around $0.30/lbs. If you're obsessed with using super-expensive flake sea salt, then you should be prepared to pay for it.
– FuzzyChef
11 hours ago
22
I suspect that the water and the heat is costing you more than the salt.
– FuzzyChef
10 hours ago
5
Salt is extremely cheap. Why not use less salt in the water and more salt in the sauce?
– Chloe
8 hours ago
8
@Bilkokuya: Phrases equally worth bearing in mind are “penny wise, pound foolish” and “time is money”. Even if you currently use a whole tablespoon of salt (a pretty vast amount), that’s about 18g, which at the 50p/lb price you cost is under 2p. Save that every day for a year, you’ve saved £7.50… the UK minimum hourly wage for an hour. More realistically if you were using a couple of teaspoonsful and doing this a few times a week, you’ll save max a couple of pounds over the year — 15 minutes’ work at minimum wage. Have you spent more than 15 minutes on this question?
– PLL
7 hours ago
4
@PLL - Table salt at my local store is about 40p for nearly a kilo. That's enough to salt a thousand pasta dishes to beyond the point that they're edible for about 0p per serving.
– Richard
6 hours ago
|
show 4 more comments
14
What kind of salt are you using? Where I live, salt is around $0.30/lbs. If you're obsessed with using super-expensive flake sea salt, then you should be prepared to pay for it.
– FuzzyChef
11 hours ago
22
I suspect that the water and the heat is costing you more than the salt.
– FuzzyChef
10 hours ago
5
Salt is extremely cheap. Why not use less salt in the water and more salt in the sauce?
– Chloe
8 hours ago
8
@Bilkokuya: Phrases equally worth bearing in mind are “penny wise, pound foolish” and “time is money”. Even if you currently use a whole tablespoon of salt (a pretty vast amount), that’s about 18g, which at the 50p/lb price you cost is under 2p. Save that every day for a year, you’ve saved £7.50… the UK minimum hourly wage for an hour. More realistically if you were using a couple of teaspoonsful and doing this a few times a week, you’ll save max a couple of pounds over the year — 15 minutes’ work at minimum wage. Have you spent more than 15 minutes on this question?
– PLL
7 hours ago
4
@PLL - Table salt at my local store is about 40p for nearly a kilo. That's enough to salt a thousand pasta dishes to beyond the point that they're edible for about 0p per serving.
– Richard
6 hours ago
14
14
What kind of salt are you using? Where I live, salt is around $0.30/lbs. If you're obsessed with using super-expensive flake sea salt, then you should be prepared to pay for it.
– FuzzyChef
11 hours ago
What kind of salt are you using? Where I live, salt is around $0.30/lbs. If you're obsessed with using super-expensive flake sea salt, then you should be prepared to pay for it.
– FuzzyChef
11 hours ago
22
22
I suspect that the water and the heat is costing you more than the salt.
– FuzzyChef
10 hours ago
I suspect that the water and the heat is costing you more than the salt.
– FuzzyChef
10 hours ago
5
5
Salt is extremely cheap. Why not use less salt in the water and more salt in the sauce?
– Chloe
8 hours ago
Salt is extremely cheap. Why not use less salt in the water and more salt in the sauce?
– Chloe
8 hours ago
8
8
@Bilkokuya: Phrases equally worth bearing in mind are “penny wise, pound foolish” and “time is money”. Even if you currently use a whole tablespoon of salt (a pretty vast amount), that’s about 18g, which at the 50p/lb price you cost is under 2p. Save that every day for a year, you’ve saved £7.50… the UK minimum hourly wage for an hour. More realistically if you were using a couple of teaspoonsful and doing this a few times a week, you’ll save max a couple of pounds over the year — 15 minutes’ work at minimum wage. Have you spent more than 15 minutes on this question?
– PLL
7 hours ago
@Bilkokuya: Phrases equally worth bearing in mind are “penny wise, pound foolish” and “time is money”. Even if you currently use a whole tablespoon of salt (a pretty vast amount), that’s about 18g, which at the 50p/lb price you cost is under 2p. Save that every day for a year, you’ve saved £7.50… the UK minimum hourly wage for an hour. More realistically if you were using a couple of teaspoonsful and doing this a few times a week, you’ll save max a couple of pounds over the year — 15 minutes’ work at minimum wage. Have you spent more than 15 minutes on this question?
– PLL
7 hours ago
4
4
@PLL - Table salt at my local store is about 40p for nearly a kilo. That's enough to salt a thousand pasta dishes to beyond the point that they're edible for about 0p per serving.
– Richard
6 hours ago
@PLL - Table salt at my local store is about 40p for nearly a kilo. That's enough to salt a thousand pasta dishes to beyond the point that they're edible for about 0p per serving.
– Richard
6 hours ago
|
show 4 more comments
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
up vote
20
down vote
It's perfectly possible to cook pasta with no salt at all, so you may be able to wean yourself onto a lower salt level, reducing it gradually.
I don't know what, if anything, you're eating with your pasta, so getting that to have more flavour might be an option.
If you're actually eating plain pasta and want it salty but as cheap as possible, the first thing you should do is cook it in as little water as possible, and with a lid. This will also reduce your fuel bills (you can reduce them still further by turning off the heat for a few minutes in the middle of cooking). If you use half as much water as before, you could start by adding half as much salt, so the concentration in the water remains the same. To a first approximation, it's the concentration that matters here.
Even if you're eating absolutely at cheaply as possible already, I'd by very surprised if you could save significant amounts of money by using less salt, and if you can, you need to consider the health implications (I won't go into more detail). Think about how much in total you spend on it, because you can't possibly save more than that.
add a comment |
up vote
8
down vote
If you can't get cheaper salt, or reduce the ratio of salt/water, and you don't want to compromise the finished result, then the only option I see is to use less water.
Cooks generally gauge the correct amount of salt in pasta water by taste-- they say the pasta water should taste like the ocean. So, if you use less water to cook your pasta, you should likewise need less salt to appropriately flavor the water (and thus the pasta). This answer indicates that using less water should still yield the same quality pasta.
3
I agree, using less water seems like the way to go for the OP's constraints, and will not have a negative affect - another resource on this seriouseats.com/2010/05/… indicates that cooking in less water has few drawbacks.
– Nat Bowman
10 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
It can be a conundrum, either you need more salt or less water. You don't want to reduce the water as this can prevent proper cooking and cause it to stick.
Luckily salt will diffuse quite rapidly into cooked pasta, a fact I discovered when I once forgot to salt my pasta at all. You can drain almost all the water, leaving just enough to barely suspend and cover the pasta, before you add the salt. The salt will diffuse into the cooked pasta. Of course this doesn't happen instantly, and the pasta will continue to cook as long as it's in the hot water, so time it for when you are about a minute from completion (adjusting for the thickness of the pasta).
This will reduce the overall amount of salt needed, since you don't need to salt the full amount of water you cook with. It may also reduce the total salt intake, as the outer layers of the pasta will take up the salt more rapidly than the inner, giving some salt flavour but reducing the amount actually consumed. Mastication will eventually homogenize the salt content, but by this time the perception of saltiness has already been encountered.
New contributor
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
The salt increases the osmotic pressure of the water as well as flavoring the pasta. If you reduce the salt the pasta will not cook properly. Since the pasta water is typically used in finishing the sauce use the amount of salt called for in the recipe, typically 1 to 4 tablespoons for the gallon of water used for a pound of pasta.
As noted in the comments above salt is literally dirt cheap.
And do not add oil to the water. Just don't.
New contributor
1 to 4 tablespoons? I sprinkle about half a teaspoon in and I get good results.. 300g of pasta, lots of water.
– insidesin
4 hours ago
"If you reduce the salt the pasta will not cook properly." Define properly? What will go "wrong" in your opinion or experience if you don't salt the water?
– Beanluc
1 hour ago
@insidesin "1 to 4 tablespoons" for a gallon of water isn't that much - I've heard the general rule is about a tablespoon per quart of water. Keep in mind that the majority of that gets poured off.
– Comintern
14 mins ago
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Cook without any salt at all, and salt to taste at the table. Less will be used and none will be wasted.
add a comment |
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
20
down vote
It's perfectly possible to cook pasta with no salt at all, so you may be able to wean yourself onto a lower salt level, reducing it gradually.
I don't know what, if anything, you're eating with your pasta, so getting that to have more flavour might be an option.
If you're actually eating plain pasta and want it salty but as cheap as possible, the first thing you should do is cook it in as little water as possible, and with a lid. This will also reduce your fuel bills (you can reduce them still further by turning off the heat for a few minutes in the middle of cooking). If you use half as much water as before, you could start by adding half as much salt, so the concentration in the water remains the same. To a first approximation, it's the concentration that matters here.
Even if you're eating absolutely at cheaply as possible already, I'd by very surprised if you could save significant amounts of money by using less salt, and if you can, you need to consider the health implications (I won't go into more detail). Think about how much in total you spend on it, because you can't possibly save more than that.
add a comment |
up vote
20
down vote
It's perfectly possible to cook pasta with no salt at all, so you may be able to wean yourself onto a lower salt level, reducing it gradually.
I don't know what, if anything, you're eating with your pasta, so getting that to have more flavour might be an option.
If you're actually eating plain pasta and want it salty but as cheap as possible, the first thing you should do is cook it in as little water as possible, and with a lid. This will also reduce your fuel bills (you can reduce them still further by turning off the heat for a few minutes in the middle of cooking). If you use half as much water as before, you could start by adding half as much salt, so the concentration in the water remains the same. To a first approximation, it's the concentration that matters here.
Even if you're eating absolutely at cheaply as possible already, I'd by very surprised if you could save significant amounts of money by using less salt, and if you can, you need to consider the health implications (I won't go into more detail). Think about how much in total you spend on it, because you can't possibly save more than that.
add a comment |
up vote
20
down vote
up vote
20
down vote
It's perfectly possible to cook pasta with no salt at all, so you may be able to wean yourself onto a lower salt level, reducing it gradually.
I don't know what, if anything, you're eating with your pasta, so getting that to have more flavour might be an option.
If you're actually eating plain pasta and want it salty but as cheap as possible, the first thing you should do is cook it in as little water as possible, and with a lid. This will also reduce your fuel bills (you can reduce them still further by turning off the heat for a few minutes in the middle of cooking). If you use half as much water as before, you could start by adding half as much salt, so the concentration in the water remains the same. To a first approximation, it's the concentration that matters here.
Even if you're eating absolutely at cheaply as possible already, I'd by very surprised if you could save significant amounts of money by using less salt, and if you can, you need to consider the health implications (I won't go into more detail). Think about how much in total you spend on it, because you can't possibly save more than that.
It's perfectly possible to cook pasta with no salt at all, so you may be able to wean yourself onto a lower salt level, reducing it gradually.
I don't know what, if anything, you're eating with your pasta, so getting that to have more flavour might be an option.
If you're actually eating plain pasta and want it salty but as cheap as possible, the first thing you should do is cook it in as little water as possible, and with a lid. This will also reduce your fuel bills (you can reduce them still further by turning off the heat for a few minutes in the middle of cooking). If you use half as much water as before, you could start by adding half as much salt, so the concentration in the water remains the same. To a first approximation, it's the concentration that matters here.
Even if you're eating absolutely at cheaply as possible already, I'd by very surprised if you could save significant amounts of money by using less salt, and if you can, you need to consider the health implications (I won't go into more detail). Think about how much in total you spend on it, because you can't possibly save more than that.
answered 11 hours ago
Chris H
16.9k13249
16.9k13249
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
8
down vote
If you can't get cheaper salt, or reduce the ratio of salt/water, and you don't want to compromise the finished result, then the only option I see is to use less water.
Cooks generally gauge the correct amount of salt in pasta water by taste-- they say the pasta water should taste like the ocean. So, if you use less water to cook your pasta, you should likewise need less salt to appropriately flavor the water (and thus the pasta). This answer indicates that using less water should still yield the same quality pasta.
3
I agree, using less water seems like the way to go for the OP's constraints, and will not have a negative affect - another resource on this seriouseats.com/2010/05/… indicates that cooking in less water has few drawbacks.
– Nat Bowman
10 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
8
down vote
If you can't get cheaper salt, or reduce the ratio of salt/water, and you don't want to compromise the finished result, then the only option I see is to use less water.
Cooks generally gauge the correct amount of salt in pasta water by taste-- they say the pasta water should taste like the ocean. So, if you use less water to cook your pasta, you should likewise need less salt to appropriately flavor the water (and thus the pasta). This answer indicates that using less water should still yield the same quality pasta.
3
I agree, using less water seems like the way to go for the OP's constraints, and will not have a negative affect - another resource on this seriouseats.com/2010/05/… indicates that cooking in less water has few drawbacks.
– Nat Bowman
10 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
8
down vote
up vote
8
down vote
If you can't get cheaper salt, or reduce the ratio of salt/water, and you don't want to compromise the finished result, then the only option I see is to use less water.
Cooks generally gauge the correct amount of salt in pasta water by taste-- they say the pasta water should taste like the ocean. So, if you use less water to cook your pasta, you should likewise need less salt to appropriately flavor the water (and thus the pasta). This answer indicates that using less water should still yield the same quality pasta.
If you can't get cheaper salt, or reduce the ratio of salt/water, and you don't want to compromise the finished result, then the only option I see is to use less water.
Cooks generally gauge the correct amount of salt in pasta water by taste-- they say the pasta water should taste like the ocean. So, if you use less water to cook your pasta, you should likewise need less salt to appropriately flavor the water (and thus the pasta). This answer indicates that using less water should still yield the same quality pasta.
answered 11 hours ago
senschen
2,226819
2,226819
3
I agree, using less water seems like the way to go for the OP's constraints, and will not have a negative affect - another resource on this seriouseats.com/2010/05/… indicates that cooking in less water has few drawbacks.
– Nat Bowman
10 hours ago
add a comment |
3
I agree, using less water seems like the way to go for the OP's constraints, and will not have a negative affect - another resource on this seriouseats.com/2010/05/… indicates that cooking in less water has few drawbacks.
– Nat Bowman
10 hours ago
3
3
I agree, using less water seems like the way to go for the OP's constraints, and will not have a negative affect - another resource on this seriouseats.com/2010/05/… indicates that cooking in less water has few drawbacks.
– Nat Bowman
10 hours ago
I agree, using less water seems like the way to go for the OP's constraints, and will not have a negative affect - another resource on this seriouseats.com/2010/05/… indicates that cooking in less water has few drawbacks.
– Nat Bowman
10 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
It can be a conundrum, either you need more salt or less water. You don't want to reduce the water as this can prevent proper cooking and cause it to stick.
Luckily salt will diffuse quite rapidly into cooked pasta, a fact I discovered when I once forgot to salt my pasta at all. You can drain almost all the water, leaving just enough to barely suspend and cover the pasta, before you add the salt. The salt will diffuse into the cooked pasta. Of course this doesn't happen instantly, and the pasta will continue to cook as long as it's in the hot water, so time it for when you are about a minute from completion (adjusting for the thickness of the pasta).
This will reduce the overall amount of salt needed, since you don't need to salt the full amount of water you cook with. It may also reduce the total salt intake, as the outer layers of the pasta will take up the salt more rapidly than the inner, giving some salt flavour but reducing the amount actually consumed. Mastication will eventually homogenize the salt content, but by this time the perception of saltiness has already been encountered.
New contributor
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
It can be a conundrum, either you need more salt or less water. You don't want to reduce the water as this can prevent proper cooking and cause it to stick.
Luckily salt will diffuse quite rapidly into cooked pasta, a fact I discovered when I once forgot to salt my pasta at all. You can drain almost all the water, leaving just enough to barely suspend and cover the pasta, before you add the salt. The salt will diffuse into the cooked pasta. Of course this doesn't happen instantly, and the pasta will continue to cook as long as it's in the hot water, so time it for when you are about a minute from completion (adjusting for the thickness of the pasta).
This will reduce the overall amount of salt needed, since you don't need to salt the full amount of water you cook with. It may also reduce the total salt intake, as the outer layers of the pasta will take up the salt more rapidly than the inner, giving some salt flavour but reducing the amount actually consumed. Mastication will eventually homogenize the salt content, but by this time the perception of saltiness has already been encountered.
New contributor
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
up vote
3
down vote
It can be a conundrum, either you need more salt or less water. You don't want to reduce the water as this can prevent proper cooking and cause it to stick.
Luckily salt will diffuse quite rapidly into cooked pasta, a fact I discovered when I once forgot to salt my pasta at all. You can drain almost all the water, leaving just enough to barely suspend and cover the pasta, before you add the salt. The salt will diffuse into the cooked pasta. Of course this doesn't happen instantly, and the pasta will continue to cook as long as it's in the hot water, so time it for when you are about a minute from completion (adjusting for the thickness of the pasta).
This will reduce the overall amount of salt needed, since you don't need to salt the full amount of water you cook with. It may also reduce the total salt intake, as the outer layers of the pasta will take up the salt more rapidly than the inner, giving some salt flavour but reducing the amount actually consumed. Mastication will eventually homogenize the salt content, but by this time the perception of saltiness has already been encountered.
New contributor
It can be a conundrum, either you need more salt or less water. You don't want to reduce the water as this can prevent proper cooking and cause it to stick.
Luckily salt will diffuse quite rapidly into cooked pasta, a fact I discovered when I once forgot to salt my pasta at all. You can drain almost all the water, leaving just enough to barely suspend and cover the pasta, before you add the salt. The salt will diffuse into the cooked pasta. Of course this doesn't happen instantly, and the pasta will continue to cook as long as it's in the hot water, so time it for when you are about a minute from completion (adjusting for the thickness of the pasta).
This will reduce the overall amount of salt needed, since you don't need to salt the full amount of water you cook with. It may also reduce the total salt intake, as the outer layers of the pasta will take up the salt more rapidly than the inner, giving some salt flavour but reducing the amount actually consumed. Mastication will eventually homogenize the salt content, but by this time the perception of saltiness has already been encountered.
New contributor
New contributor
answered 8 hours ago
Kurt Fitzner
1313
1313
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
The salt increases the osmotic pressure of the water as well as flavoring the pasta. If you reduce the salt the pasta will not cook properly. Since the pasta water is typically used in finishing the sauce use the amount of salt called for in the recipe, typically 1 to 4 tablespoons for the gallon of water used for a pound of pasta.
As noted in the comments above salt is literally dirt cheap.
And do not add oil to the water. Just don't.
New contributor
1 to 4 tablespoons? I sprinkle about half a teaspoon in and I get good results.. 300g of pasta, lots of water.
– insidesin
4 hours ago
"If you reduce the salt the pasta will not cook properly." Define properly? What will go "wrong" in your opinion or experience if you don't salt the water?
– Beanluc
1 hour ago
@insidesin "1 to 4 tablespoons" for a gallon of water isn't that much - I've heard the general rule is about a tablespoon per quart of water. Keep in mind that the majority of that gets poured off.
– Comintern
14 mins ago
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
The salt increases the osmotic pressure of the water as well as flavoring the pasta. If you reduce the salt the pasta will not cook properly. Since the pasta water is typically used in finishing the sauce use the amount of salt called for in the recipe, typically 1 to 4 tablespoons for the gallon of water used for a pound of pasta.
As noted in the comments above salt is literally dirt cheap.
And do not add oil to the water. Just don't.
New contributor
1 to 4 tablespoons? I sprinkle about half a teaspoon in and I get good results.. 300g of pasta, lots of water.
– insidesin
4 hours ago
"If you reduce the salt the pasta will not cook properly." Define properly? What will go "wrong" in your opinion or experience if you don't salt the water?
– Beanluc
1 hour ago
@insidesin "1 to 4 tablespoons" for a gallon of water isn't that much - I've heard the general rule is about a tablespoon per quart of water. Keep in mind that the majority of that gets poured off.
– Comintern
14 mins ago
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
The salt increases the osmotic pressure of the water as well as flavoring the pasta. If you reduce the salt the pasta will not cook properly. Since the pasta water is typically used in finishing the sauce use the amount of salt called for in the recipe, typically 1 to 4 tablespoons for the gallon of water used for a pound of pasta.
As noted in the comments above salt is literally dirt cheap.
And do not add oil to the water. Just don't.
New contributor
The salt increases the osmotic pressure of the water as well as flavoring the pasta. If you reduce the salt the pasta will not cook properly. Since the pasta water is typically used in finishing the sauce use the amount of salt called for in the recipe, typically 1 to 4 tablespoons for the gallon of water used for a pound of pasta.
As noted in the comments above salt is literally dirt cheap.
And do not add oil to the water. Just don't.
New contributor
New contributor
answered 4 hours ago
user37401
1
1
New contributor
New contributor
1 to 4 tablespoons? I sprinkle about half a teaspoon in and I get good results.. 300g of pasta, lots of water.
– insidesin
4 hours ago
"If you reduce the salt the pasta will not cook properly." Define properly? What will go "wrong" in your opinion or experience if you don't salt the water?
– Beanluc
1 hour ago
@insidesin "1 to 4 tablespoons" for a gallon of water isn't that much - I've heard the general rule is about a tablespoon per quart of water. Keep in mind that the majority of that gets poured off.
– Comintern
14 mins ago
add a comment |
1 to 4 tablespoons? I sprinkle about half a teaspoon in and I get good results.. 300g of pasta, lots of water.
– insidesin
4 hours ago
"If you reduce the salt the pasta will not cook properly." Define properly? What will go "wrong" in your opinion or experience if you don't salt the water?
– Beanluc
1 hour ago
@insidesin "1 to 4 tablespoons" for a gallon of water isn't that much - I've heard the general rule is about a tablespoon per quart of water. Keep in mind that the majority of that gets poured off.
– Comintern
14 mins ago
1 to 4 tablespoons? I sprinkle about half a teaspoon in and I get good results.. 300g of pasta, lots of water.
– insidesin
4 hours ago
1 to 4 tablespoons? I sprinkle about half a teaspoon in and I get good results.. 300g of pasta, lots of water.
– insidesin
4 hours ago
"If you reduce the salt the pasta will not cook properly." Define properly? What will go "wrong" in your opinion or experience if you don't salt the water?
– Beanluc
1 hour ago
"If you reduce the salt the pasta will not cook properly." Define properly? What will go "wrong" in your opinion or experience if you don't salt the water?
– Beanluc
1 hour ago
@insidesin "1 to 4 tablespoons" for a gallon of water isn't that much - I've heard the general rule is about a tablespoon per quart of water. Keep in mind that the majority of that gets poured off.
– Comintern
14 mins ago
@insidesin "1 to 4 tablespoons" for a gallon of water isn't that much - I've heard the general rule is about a tablespoon per quart of water. Keep in mind that the majority of that gets poured off.
– Comintern
14 mins ago
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Cook without any salt at all, and salt to taste at the table. Less will be used and none will be wasted.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Cook without any salt at all, and salt to taste at the table. Less will be used and none will be wasted.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
Cook without any salt at all, and salt to taste at the table. Less will be used and none will be wasted.
Cook without any salt at all, and salt to taste at the table. Less will be used and none will be wasted.
answered 1 hour ago
Beanluc
23816
23816
add a comment |
add a comment |
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcooking.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f94256%2fhow-can-i-be-more-frugal-with-salt-when-cooking-dried-pasta%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
14
What kind of salt are you using? Where I live, salt is around $0.30/lbs. If you're obsessed with using super-expensive flake sea salt, then you should be prepared to pay for it.
– FuzzyChef
11 hours ago
22
I suspect that the water and the heat is costing you more than the salt.
– FuzzyChef
10 hours ago
5
Salt is extremely cheap. Why not use less salt in the water and more salt in the sauce?
– Chloe
8 hours ago
8
@Bilkokuya: Phrases equally worth bearing in mind are “penny wise, pound foolish” and “time is money”. Even if you currently use a whole tablespoon of salt (a pretty vast amount), that’s about 18g, which at the 50p/lb price you cost is under 2p. Save that every day for a year, you’ve saved £7.50… the UK minimum hourly wage for an hour. More realistically if you were using a couple of teaspoonsful and doing this a few times a week, you’ll save max a couple of pounds over the year — 15 minutes’ work at minimum wage. Have you spent more than 15 minutes on this question?
– PLL
7 hours ago
4
@PLL - Table salt at my local store is about 40p for nearly a kilo. That's enough to salt a thousand pasta dishes to beyond the point that they're edible for about 0p per serving.
– Richard
6 hours ago