Fractions common denominator











up vote
8
down vote

favorite
2












I am trying to receive this look of fractions enter image description here



I need the red numbers, which are over the fractions.
*They need to be normal, not handwritten-like.
Here is my code



documentclass[10pt,oneside,a5paper]{article}

usepackage{amsmath}

begin{document}

    $dfrac{13}{25}, dfrac{9}{20}, dfrac{3}{4},

    dfrac{3}{4}, dfrac{3}{5}, dfrac{1}{6};$

end{document}





fractions







share|improve this question
























  • Do they also have to be printed in such a handwritten-like font?
    – siracusa
    Dec 8 at 14:50










  • They need to be normal, not handwritten-like.
    – Simeon Simeonov
    Dec 8 at 14:51










  • Do you need the curved lines below the numbers?
    – Sigur
    Dec 8 at 14:53










  • It would be nice.
    – Simeon Simeonov
    Dec 8 at 14:59

















up vote
8
down vote

favorite
2












I am trying to receive this look of fractions enter image description here



I need the red numbers, which are over the fractions.
*They need to be normal, not handwritten-like.
Here is my code



documentclass[10pt,oneside,a5paper]{article}

usepackage{amsmath}

begin{document}

    $dfrac{13}{25}, dfrac{9}{20}, dfrac{3}{4},

    dfrac{3}{4}, dfrac{3}{5}, dfrac{1}{6};$

end{document}





fractions







share|improve this question
























  • Do they also have to be printed in such a handwritten-like font?
    – siracusa
    Dec 8 at 14:50










  • They need to be normal, not handwritten-like.
    – Simeon Simeonov
    Dec 8 at 14:51










  • Do you need the curved lines below the numbers?
    – Sigur
    Dec 8 at 14:53










  • It would be nice.
    – Simeon Simeonov
    Dec 8 at 14:59















up vote
8
down vote

favorite
2









up vote
8
down vote

favorite
2






2





I am trying to receive this look of fractions enter image description here



I need the red numbers, which are over the fractions.
*They need to be normal, not handwritten-like.
Here is my code



documentclass[10pt,oneside,a5paper]{article}

usepackage{amsmath}

begin{document}

    $dfrac{13}{25}, dfrac{9}{20}, dfrac{3}{4},

    dfrac{3}{4}, dfrac{3}{5}, dfrac{1}{6};$

end{document}





fractions







share|improve this question















I am trying to receive this look of fractions enter image description here



I need the red numbers, which are over the fractions.
*They need to be normal, not handwritten-like.
Here is my code



documentclass[10pt,oneside,a5paper]{article}

usepackage{amsmath}

begin{document}

    $dfrac{13}{25}, dfrac{9}{20}, dfrac{3}{4},

    dfrac{3}{4}, dfrac{3}{5}, dfrac{1}{6};$

end{document}





fractions




fractions






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Dec 8 at 14:51

























asked Dec 8 at 14:06









Simeon Simeonov

1275




1275












  • Do they also have to be printed in such a handwritten-like font?
    – siracusa
    Dec 8 at 14:50










  • They need to be normal, not handwritten-like.
    – Simeon Simeonov
    Dec 8 at 14:51










  • Do you need the curved lines below the numbers?
    – Sigur
    Dec 8 at 14:53










  • It would be nice.
    – Simeon Simeonov
    Dec 8 at 14:59




















  • Do they also have to be printed in such a handwritten-like font?
    – siracusa
    Dec 8 at 14:50










  • They need to be normal, not handwritten-like.
    – Simeon Simeonov
    Dec 8 at 14:51










  • Do you need the curved lines below the numbers?
    – Sigur
    Dec 8 at 14:53










  • It would be nice.
    – Simeon Simeonov
    Dec 8 at 14:59


















Do they also have to be printed in such a handwritten-like font?
– siracusa
Dec 8 at 14:50




Do they also have to be printed in such a handwritten-like font?
– siracusa
Dec 8 at 14:50












They need to be normal, not handwritten-like.
– Simeon Simeonov
Dec 8 at 14:51




They need to be normal, not handwritten-like.
– Simeon Simeonov
Dec 8 at 14:51












Do you need the curved lines below the numbers?
– Sigur
Dec 8 at 14:53




Do you need the curved lines below the numbers?
– Sigur
Dec 8 at 14:53












It would be nice.
– Simeon Simeonov
Dec 8 at 14:59






It would be nice.
– Simeon Simeonov
Dec 8 at 14:59












4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
10
down vote



accepted










Why take the risk of an error in computing ?



documentclass{article}

usepackage{amsmath}

usepackage{xintgcd}



newsaveboxmybox

newcommand{fractionswithlcm}[1]{%

  sboxmybox{gdefsimeondenominators{}%

      deffracm##1##2{xdefsimeondenominators{simeondenominators{##2}}}%

      $#1$}%

  edefsimeonlcm{xintLCMof{simeondenominators}}%

  {underbrace{#1}_{displaystylesimeonlcm}}%

}

newcommand{fracm}[2]{%

  overset{xintiiQuo{simeonlcm}{#2}}%

          {overset{displaystylesmile}{frac{#1}{#2}}}%

}



begin{document}



[

fractionswithlcm{

  fracm{13}{25},

  fracm{9}{20},

  fracm{3}{4},

  fracm{3}{5},

  fracm{1}{6}

}

]



end{document}


enter image description here




As per OP request in a comment, here is with only the numbers on top but not anymore the big underbrace.



documentclass{article}

usepackage{amsmath}

usepackage{xintgcd}



newsaveboxmybox

newcommand{fractionswithlcm}[1]{%

  sboxmybox{gdefsimeondenominators{}%

      deffracm##1##2{xdefsimeondenominators{simeondenominators{##2}}}%

      $#1$}%

  edefsimeonlcm{xintLCMof{simeondenominators}}%

  #1%

}

newcommand{fracm}[2]{%

  overset{xintiiQuo{simeonlcm}{#2}}%

          {overset{displaystylesmile}{frac{#1}{#2}}}%

}



begin{document}



[

fractionswithlcm{

  fracm{13}{25},

  fracm{9}{20},

  fracm{3}{4},

  fracm{3}{5},

  fracm{1}{6}

}

]



end{document}


enter image description here






share|improve this answer























  • I was kind of expecting it. :-)
    – egreg
    Dec 8 at 22:18










  • Conversely, why take the risk of an error in code? ;-)
    – R..
    Dec 9 at 3:48






  • 1




    @R.. there is indeed a risk here as I should probably not have the fracm globally defined to use the xintiiQuo{simeonlcm}{#2} operation. In this approach the fracm should arguably be a macro whose usage is strictly restricted to inside fractionswithlcm argument...
    – jfbu
    Dec 9 at 12:02










  • @egreg your answer without expl3/xparse demonstrates indeed that one can vanquish addictions :) ... I am not as strong !
    – jfbu
    Dec 9 at 12:05










  • Amazing. Can you remove the big bracket with number 300. I need only the fractions with the curves.
    – Simeon Simeonov
    Dec 9 at 12:54


















up vote
13
down vote













For the curved symbol you can use smile:



documentclass{article}

usepackage{amsmath}



newcommand{fractionswithlcm}[2]{%

  {underbrace{#1}_{displaystyle#2}}%

}

newcommand{fracm}[3]{%

  overset{#1}{overset{displaystylesmile}{frac{#2}{#3}}}%

}



begin{document}



[

fractionswithlcm{

  fracm{12}{13}{25},

  fracm{15}{9}{20},

  fracm{75}{3}{4},

  fracm{60}{3}{5},

  fracm{50}{1}{6}

}{300}

]



end{document}


enter image description here






share|improve this answer




























    up vote
    4
    down vote













    With widehat instead of curves:



    mew



    documentclass{article}
    
usepackage{amsmath}
    
begin{document}
    
$overset{underbrace{
    
underset{widehat{dfrac{13}{25},}}{12}
    
underset{widehat{dfrac{9}{20}},}{15}
    
underset{widehat{dfrac{3}{4}}, }{75}
    
underset{widehat{dfrac{1}{6}}, }{60}
    
underset{widehat{dfrac{3}{5}} }{50}
    
}}{300}$
    
end{document}


    Edit: Ok, with curves



    mwe



    documentclass{article}
    
usepackage{amsmath}
    
% https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/191042/11604
    
makeatletter
    
defwidebreve#1{mathop{vbox{m@thialign{##crcrnoalign{kern3p@}%
    
      brevefillcrcrnoalign{kern3p@nointerlineskip}%
    
      $hfildisplaystyle{#1}hfil$crcr}}}limits}
    

    
defbrevefill{$m@th setboxz@hbox{$braceld$}%
    
  braceluleadersvrule @heighthtz@ @depthz@hfillbraceru$}
    
makeatletter
    

    
begin{document}
    
$overset{underbrace{
    
underset{widebreve{dfrac{13}{makebox[1em]{25}}},}{12}
    
underset{widebreve{dfrac{9}{makebox[1em]{20}}},}{15}
    
underset{widebreve{dfrac{3}{makebox[1em]{4}}},}{75}
    
underset{widebreve{dfrac{1}{makebox[1em]{6}}},}{60}
    
underset{widebreve{dfrac{3}{makebox[1em]{5}}}}{50}
    
}}{300}$
    
end{document}





    share|improve this answer























    • But I think that the mark should be below the top numbers, not above the 2nd row numbers.
      – Sigur
      Dec 8 at 16:03










    • It should be curved up, like half circle.
      – Sigur
      Dec 8 at 18:00










    • I think they should be under and centered with the 1st row numbers. Lets see.
      – Sigur
      Dec 8 at 18:28










    • BTW not relevant to the TeX part, but in this answer 3/5 and 1/6 are switched relative to the question (while the numbers above are not).
      – ShreevatsaR
      Dec 8 at 20:26


















    up vote
    3
    down vote













    What about this?



    documentclass[10pt,oneside,a5paper]{article}
    
usepackage{amsmath}
    
newcommand{myfrac}[3]{overset{#1}{dfrac{#2}{#3}}}
    

    
begin{document}
    
$myfrac{12}{13}{25}, myfrac{15}{9}{20}, myfrac{75}{3}{4}, myfrac{60}{3}{5}, myfrac{50}{1}{6}$
    
end{document}


    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer





















    • I like it. But I need the curved lines above. I don't know if it's possible.Thank you!
      – Simeon Simeonov
      Dec 8 at 15:01











    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "85"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f463816%2ffractions-common-denominator%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    4 Answers
    4






    active

    oldest

    votes








    4 Answers
    4






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    10
    down vote



    accepted










    Why take the risk of an error in computing ?



    documentclass{article}
    
usepackage{amsmath}
    
usepackage{xintgcd}
    

    
newsaveboxmybox
    
newcommand{fractionswithlcm}[1]{%
    
  sboxmybox{gdefsimeondenominators{}%
    
      deffracm##1##2{xdefsimeondenominators{simeondenominators{##2}}}%
    
      $#1$}%
    
  edefsimeonlcm{xintLCMof{simeondenominators}}%
    
  {underbrace{#1}_{displaystylesimeonlcm}}%
    
}
    
newcommand{fracm}[2]{%
    
  overset{xintiiQuo{simeonlcm}{#2}}%
    
          {overset{displaystylesmile}{frac{#1}{#2}}}%
    
}
    

    
begin{document}
    

    
[
    
fractionswithlcm{
    
  fracm{13}{25},
    
  fracm{9}{20},
    
  fracm{3}{4},
    
  fracm{3}{5},
    
  fracm{1}{6}
    
}
    
]
    

    
end{document}


    enter image description here




    As per OP request in a comment, here is with only the numbers on top but not anymore the big underbrace.



    documentclass{article}
    
usepackage{amsmath}
    
usepackage{xintgcd}
    

    
newsaveboxmybox
    
newcommand{fractionswithlcm}[1]{%
    
  sboxmybox{gdefsimeondenominators{}%
    
      deffracm##1##2{xdefsimeondenominators{simeondenominators{##2}}}%
    
      $#1$}%
    
  edefsimeonlcm{xintLCMof{simeondenominators}}%
    
  #1%
    
}
    
newcommand{fracm}[2]{%
    
  overset{xintiiQuo{simeonlcm}{#2}}%
    
          {overset{displaystylesmile}{frac{#1}{#2}}}%
    
}
    

    
begin{document}
    

    
[
    
fractionswithlcm{
    
  fracm{13}{25},
    
  fracm{9}{20},
    
  fracm{3}{4},
    
  fracm{3}{5},
    
  fracm{1}{6}
    
}
    
]
    

    
end{document}


    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer























    • I was kind of expecting it. :-)
      – egreg
      Dec 8 at 22:18










    • Conversely, why take the risk of an error in code? ;-)
      – R..
      Dec 9 at 3:48






    • 1




      @R.. there is indeed a risk here as I should probably not have the fracm globally defined to use the xintiiQuo{simeonlcm}{#2} operation. In this approach the fracm should arguably be a macro whose usage is strictly restricted to inside fractionswithlcm argument...
      – jfbu
      Dec 9 at 12:02










    • @egreg your answer without expl3/xparse demonstrates indeed that one can vanquish addictions :) ... I am not as strong !
      – jfbu
      Dec 9 at 12:05










    • Amazing. Can you remove the big bracket with number 300. I need only the fractions with the curves.
      – Simeon Simeonov
      Dec 9 at 12:54















    up vote
    10
    down vote



    accepted










    Why take the risk of an error in computing ?



    documentclass{article}
    
usepackage{amsmath}
    
usepackage{xintgcd}
    

    
newsaveboxmybox
    
newcommand{fractionswithlcm}[1]{%
    
  sboxmybox{gdefsimeondenominators{}%
    
      deffracm##1##2{xdefsimeondenominators{simeondenominators{##2}}}%
    
      $#1$}%
    
  edefsimeonlcm{xintLCMof{simeondenominators}}%
    
  {underbrace{#1}_{displaystylesimeonlcm}}%
    
}
    
newcommand{fracm}[2]{%
    
  overset{xintiiQuo{simeonlcm}{#2}}%
    
          {overset{displaystylesmile}{frac{#1}{#2}}}%
    
}
    

    
begin{document}
    

    
[
    
fractionswithlcm{
    
  fracm{13}{25},
    
  fracm{9}{20},
    
  fracm{3}{4},
    
  fracm{3}{5},
    
  fracm{1}{6}
    
}
    
]
    

    
end{document}


    enter image description here




    As per OP request in a comment, here is with only the numbers on top but not anymore the big underbrace.



    documentclass{article}
    
usepackage{amsmath}
    
usepackage{xintgcd}
    

    
newsaveboxmybox
    
newcommand{fractionswithlcm}[1]{%
    
  sboxmybox{gdefsimeondenominators{}%
    
      deffracm##1##2{xdefsimeondenominators{simeondenominators{##2}}}%
    
      $#1$}%
    
  edefsimeonlcm{xintLCMof{simeondenominators}}%
    
  #1%
    
}
    
newcommand{fracm}[2]{%
    
  overset{xintiiQuo{simeonlcm}{#2}}%
    
          {overset{displaystylesmile}{frac{#1}{#2}}}%
    
}
    

    
begin{document}
    

    
[
    
fractionswithlcm{
    
  fracm{13}{25},
    
  fracm{9}{20},
    
  fracm{3}{4},
    
  fracm{3}{5},
    
  fracm{1}{6}
    
}
    
]
    

    
end{document}


    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer























    • I was kind of expecting it. :-)
      – egreg
      Dec 8 at 22:18










    • Conversely, why take the risk of an error in code? ;-)
      – R..
      Dec 9 at 3:48






    • 1




      @R.. there is indeed a risk here as I should probably not have the fracm globally defined to use the xintiiQuo{simeonlcm}{#2} operation. In this approach the fracm should arguably be a macro whose usage is strictly restricted to inside fractionswithlcm argument...
      – jfbu
      Dec 9 at 12:02










    • @egreg your answer without expl3/xparse demonstrates indeed that one can vanquish addictions :) ... I am not as strong !
      – jfbu
      Dec 9 at 12:05










    • Amazing. Can you remove the big bracket with number 300. I need only the fractions with the curves.
      – Simeon Simeonov
      Dec 9 at 12:54













    up vote
    10
    down vote



    accepted







    up vote
    10
    down vote



    accepted






    Why take the risk of an error in computing ?



    documentclass{article}
    
usepackage{amsmath}
    
usepackage{xintgcd}
    

    
newsaveboxmybox
    
newcommand{fractionswithlcm}[1]{%
    
  sboxmybox{gdefsimeondenominators{}%
    
      deffracm##1##2{xdefsimeondenominators{simeondenominators{##2}}}%
    
      $#1$}%
    
  edefsimeonlcm{xintLCMof{simeondenominators}}%
    
  {underbrace{#1}_{displaystylesimeonlcm}}%
    
}
    
newcommand{fracm}[2]{%
    
  overset{xintiiQuo{simeonlcm}{#2}}%
    
          {overset{displaystylesmile}{frac{#1}{#2}}}%
    
}
    

    
begin{document}
    

    
[
    
fractionswithlcm{
    
  fracm{13}{25},
    
  fracm{9}{20},
    
  fracm{3}{4},
    
  fracm{3}{5},
    
  fracm{1}{6}
    
}
    
]
    

    
end{document}


    enter image description here




    As per OP request in a comment, here is with only the numbers on top but not anymore the big underbrace.



    documentclass{article}
    
usepackage{amsmath}
    
usepackage{xintgcd}
    

    
newsaveboxmybox
    
newcommand{fractionswithlcm}[1]{%
    
  sboxmybox{gdefsimeondenominators{}%
    
      deffracm##1##2{xdefsimeondenominators{simeondenominators{##2}}}%
    
      $#1$}%
    
  edefsimeonlcm{xintLCMof{simeondenominators}}%
    
  #1%
    
}
    
newcommand{fracm}[2]{%
    
  overset{xintiiQuo{simeonlcm}{#2}}%
    
          {overset{displaystylesmile}{frac{#1}{#2}}}%
    
}
    

    
begin{document}
    

    
[
    
fractionswithlcm{
    
  fracm{13}{25},
    
  fracm{9}{20},
    
  fracm{3}{4},
    
  fracm{3}{5},
    
  fracm{1}{6}
    
}
    
]
    

    
end{document}


    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer














    Why take the risk of an error in computing ?



    documentclass{article}
    
usepackage{amsmath}
    
usepackage{xintgcd}
    

    
newsaveboxmybox
    
newcommand{fractionswithlcm}[1]{%
    
  sboxmybox{gdefsimeondenominators{}%
    
      deffracm##1##2{xdefsimeondenominators{simeondenominators{##2}}}%
    
      $#1$}%
    
  edefsimeonlcm{xintLCMof{simeondenominators}}%
    
  {underbrace{#1}_{displaystylesimeonlcm}}%
    
}
    
newcommand{fracm}[2]{%
    
  overset{xintiiQuo{simeonlcm}{#2}}%
    
          {overset{displaystylesmile}{frac{#1}{#2}}}%
    
}
    

    
begin{document}
    

    
[
    
fractionswithlcm{
    
  fracm{13}{25},
    
  fracm{9}{20},
    
  fracm{3}{4},
    
  fracm{3}{5},
    
  fracm{1}{6}
    
}
    
]
    

    
end{document}


    enter image description here




    As per OP request in a comment, here is with only the numbers on top but not anymore the big underbrace.



    documentclass{article}
    
usepackage{amsmath}
    
usepackage{xintgcd}
    

    
newsaveboxmybox
    
newcommand{fractionswithlcm}[1]{%
    
  sboxmybox{gdefsimeondenominators{}%
    
      deffracm##1##2{xdefsimeondenominators{simeondenominators{##2}}}%
    
      $#1$}%
    
  edefsimeonlcm{xintLCMof{simeondenominators}}%
    
  #1%
    
}
    
newcommand{fracm}[2]{%
    
  overset{xintiiQuo{simeonlcm}{#2}}%
    
          {overset{displaystylesmile}{frac{#1}{#2}}}%
    
}
    

    
begin{document}
    

    
[
    
fractionswithlcm{
    
  fracm{13}{25},
    
  fracm{9}{20},
    
  fracm{3}{4},
    
  fracm{3}{5},
    
  fracm{1}{6}
    
}
    
]
    

    
end{document}


    enter image description here







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Dec 9 at 16:24

























    answered Dec 8 at 21:54









    jfbu

    45.8k66147




    45.8k66147












    • I was kind of expecting it. :-)
      – egreg
      Dec 8 at 22:18










    • Conversely, why take the risk of an error in code? ;-)
      – R..
      Dec 9 at 3:48






    • 1




      @R.. there is indeed a risk here as I should probably not have the fracm globally defined to use the xintiiQuo{simeonlcm}{#2} operation. In this approach the fracm should arguably be a macro whose usage is strictly restricted to inside fractionswithlcm argument...
      – jfbu
      Dec 9 at 12:02










    • @egreg your answer without expl3/xparse demonstrates indeed that one can vanquish addictions :) ... I am not as strong !
      – jfbu
      Dec 9 at 12:05










    • Amazing. Can you remove the big bracket with number 300. I need only the fractions with the curves.
      – Simeon Simeonov
      Dec 9 at 12:54


















    • I was kind of expecting it. :-)
      – egreg
      Dec 8 at 22:18










    • Conversely, why take the risk of an error in code? ;-)
      – R..
      Dec 9 at 3:48






    • 1




      @R.. there is indeed a risk here as I should probably not have the fracm globally defined to use the xintiiQuo{simeonlcm}{#2} operation. In this approach the fracm should arguably be a macro whose usage is strictly restricted to inside fractionswithlcm argument...
      – jfbu
      Dec 9 at 12:02










    • @egreg your answer without expl3/xparse demonstrates indeed that one can vanquish addictions :) ... I am not as strong !
      – jfbu
      Dec 9 at 12:05










    • Amazing. Can you remove the big bracket with number 300. I need only the fractions with the curves.
      – Simeon Simeonov
      Dec 9 at 12:54
















    I was kind of expecting it. :-)
    – egreg
    Dec 8 at 22:18




    I was kind of expecting it. :-)
    – egreg
    Dec 8 at 22:18












    Conversely, why take the risk of an error in code? ;-)
    – R..
    Dec 9 at 3:48




    Conversely, why take the risk of an error in code? ;-)
    – R..
    Dec 9 at 3:48




    1




    1




    @R.. there is indeed a risk here as I should probably not have the fracm globally defined to use the xintiiQuo{simeonlcm}{#2} operation. In this approach the fracm should arguably be a macro whose usage is strictly restricted to inside fractionswithlcm argument...
    – jfbu
    Dec 9 at 12:02




    @R.. there is indeed a risk here as I should probably not have the fracm globally defined to use the xintiiQuo{simeonlcm}{#2} operation. In this approach the fracm should arguably be a macro whose usage is strictly restricted to inside fractionswithlcm argument...
    – jfbu
    Dec 9 at 12:02












    @egreg your answer without expl3/xparse demonstrates indeed that one can vanquish addictions :) ... I am not as strong !
    – jfbu
    Dec 9 at 12:05




    @egreg your answer without expl3/xparse demonstrates indeed that one can vanquish addictions :) ... I am not as strong !
    – jfbu
    Dec 9 at 12:05












    Amazing. Can you remove the big bracket with number 300. I need only the fractions with the curves.
    – Simeon Simeonov
    Dec 9 at 12:54




    Amazing. Can you remove the big bracket with number 300. I need only the fractions with the curves.
    – Simeon Simeonov
    Dec 9 at 12:54










    up vote
    13
    down vote













    For the curved symbol you can use smile:



    documentclass{article}
    
usepackage{amsmath}
    

    
newcommand{fractionswithlcm}[2]{%
    
  {underbrace{#1}_{displaystyle#2}}%
    
}
    
newcommand{fracm}[3]{%
    
  overset{#1}{overset{displaystylesmile}{frac{#2}{#3}}}%
    
}
    

    
begin{document}
    

    
[
    
fractionswithlcm{
    
  fracm{12}{13}{25},
    
  fracm{15}{9}{20},
    
  fracm{75}{3}{4},
    
  fracm{60}{3}{5},
    
  fracm{50}{1}{6}
    
}{300}
    
]
    

    
end{document}


    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer

























      up vote
      13
      down vote













      For the curved symbol you can use smile:



      documentclass{article}
      
usepackage{amsmath}
      

      
newcommand{fractionswithlcm}[2]{%
      
  {underbrace{#1}_{displaystyle#2}}%
      
}
      
newcommand{fracm}[3]{%
      
  overset{#1}{overset{displaystylesmile}{frac{#2}{#3}}}%
      
}
      

      
begin{document}
      

      
[
      
fractionswithlcm{
      
  fracm{12}{13}{25},
      
  fracm{15}{9}{20},
      
  fracm{75}{3}{4},
      
  fracm{60}{3}{5},
      
  fracm{50}{1}{6}
      
}{300}
      
]
      

      
end{document}


      enter image description here






      share|improve this answer























        up vote
        13
        down vote










        up vote
        13
        down vote









        For the curved symbol you can use smile:



        documentclass{article}
        
usepackage{amsmath}
        

        
newcommand{fractionswithlcm}[2]{%
        
  {underbrace{#1}_{displaystyle#2}}%
        
}
        
newcommand{fracm}[3]{%
        
  overset{#1}{overset{displaystylesmile}{frac{#2}{#3}}}%
        
}
        

        
begin{document}
        

        
[
        
fractionswithlcm{
        
  fracm{12}{13}{25},
        
  fracm{15}{9}{20},
        
  fracm{75}{3}{4},
        
  fracm{60}{3}{5},
        
  fracm{50}{1}{6}
        
}{300}
        
]
        

        
end{document}


        enter image description here






        share|improve this answer












        For the curved symbol you can use smile:



        documentclass{article}
        
usepackage{amsmath}
        

        
newcommand{fractionswithlcm}[2]{%
        
  {underbrace{#1}_{displaystyle#2}}%
        
}
        
newcommand{fracm}[3]{%
        
  overset{#1}{overset{displaystylesmile}{frac{#2}{#3}}}%
        
}
        

        
begin{document}
        

        
[
        
fractionswithlcm{
        
  fracm{12}{13}{25},
        
  fracm{15}{9}{20},
        
  fracm{75}{3}{4},
        
  fracm{60}{3}{5},
        
  fracm{50}{1}{6}
        
}{300}
        
]
        

        
end{document}


        enter image description here







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Dec 8 at 19:06









        egreg

        704k8618763155




        704k8618763155






















            up vote
            4
            down vote













            With widehat instead of curves:



            mew



            documentclass{article}
            
usepackage{amsmath}
            
begin{document}
            
$overset{underbrace{
            
underset{widehat{dfrac{13}{25},}}{12}
            
underset{widehat{dfrac{9}{20}},}{15}
            
underset{widehat{dfrac{3}{4}}, }{75}
            
underset{widehat{dfrac{1}{6}}, }{60}
            
underset{widehat{dfrac{3}{5}} }{50}
            
}}{300}$
            
end{document}


            Edit: Ok, with curves



            mwe



            documentclass{article}
            
usepackage{amsmath}
            
% https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/191042/11604
            
makeatletter
            
defwidebreve#1{mathop{vbox{m@thialign{##crcrnoalign{kern3p@}%
            
      brevefillcrcrnoalign{kern3p@nointerlineskip}%
            
      $hfildisplaystyle{#1}hfil$crcr}}}limits}
            

            
defbrevefill{$m@th setboxz@hbox{$braceld$}%
            
  braceluleadersvrule @heighthtz@ @depthz@hfillbraceru$}
            
makeatletter
            

            
begin{document}
            
$overset{underbrace{
            
underset{widebreve{dfrac{13}{makebox[1em]{25}}},}{12}
            
underset{widebreve{dfrac{9}{makebox[1em]{20}}},}{15}
            
underset{widebreve{dfrac{3}{makebox[1em]{4}}},}{75}
            
underset{widebreve{dfrac{1}{makebox[1em]{6}}},}{60}
            
underset{widebreve{dfrac{3}{makebox[1em]{5}}}}{50}
            
}}{300}$
            
end{document}





            share|improve this answer























            • But I think that the mark should be below the top numbers, not above the 2nd row numbers.
              – Sigur
              Dec 8 at 16:03










            • It should be curved up, like half circle.
              – Sigur
              Dec 8 at 18:00










            • I think they should be under and centered with the 1st row numbers. Lets see.
              – Sigur
              Dec 8 at 18:28










            • BTW not relevant to the TeX part, but in this answer 3/5 and 1/6 are switched relative to the question (while the numbers above are not).
              – ShreevatsaR
              Dec 8 at 20:26















            up vote
            4
            down vote













            With widehat instead of curves:



            mew



            documentclass{article}
            
usepackage{amsmath}
            
begin{document}
            
$overset{underbrace{
            
underset{widehat{dfrac{13}{25},}}{12}
            
underset{widehat{dfrac{9}{20}},}{15}
            
underset{widehat{dfrac{3}{4}}, }{75}
            
underset{widehat{dfrac{1}{6}}, }{60}
            
underset{widehat{dfrac{3}{5}} }{50}
            
}}{300}$
            
end{document}


            Edit: Ok, with curves



            mwe



            documentclass{article}
            
usepackage{amsmath}
            
% https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/191042/11604
            
makeatletter
            
defwidebreve#1{mathop{vbox{m@thialign{##crcrnoalign{kern3p@}%
            
      brevefillcrcrnoalign{kern3p@nointerlineskip}%
            
      $hfildisplaystyle{#1}hfil$crcr}}}limits}
            

            
defbrevefill{$m@th setboxz@hbox{$braceld$}%
            
  braceluleadersvrule @heighthtz@ @depthz@hfillbraceru$}
            
makeatletter
            

            
begin{document}
            
$overset{underbrace{
            
underset{widebreve{dfrac{13}{makebox[1em]{25}}},}{12}
            
underset{widebreve{dfrac{9}{makebox[1em]{20}}},}{15}
            
underset{widebreve{dfrac{3}{makebox[1em]{4}}},}{75}
            
underset{widebreve{dfrac{1}{makebox[1em]{6}}},}{60}
            
underset{widebreve{dfrac{3}{makebox[1em]{5}}}}{50}
            
}}{300}$
            
end{document}





            share|improve this answer























            • But I think that the mark should be below the top numbers, not above the 2nd row numbers.
              – Sigur
              Dec 8 at 16:03










            • It should be curved up, like half circle.
              – Sigur
              Dec 8 at 18:00










            • I think they should be under and centered with the 1st row numbers. Lets see.
              – Sigur
              Dec 8 at 18:28










            • BTW not relevant to the TeX part, but in this answer 3/5 and 1/6 are switched relative to the question (while the numbers above are not).
              – ShreevatsaR
              Dec 8 at 20:26













            up vote
            4
            down vote










            up vote
            4
            down vote









            With widehat instead of curves:



            mew



            documentclass{article}
            
usepackage{amsmath}
            
begin{document}
            
$overset{underbrace{
            
underset{widehat{dfrac{13}{25},}}{12}
            
underset{widehat{dfrac{9}{20}},}{15}
            
underset{widehat{dfrac{3}{4}}, }{75}
            
underset{widehat{dfrac{1}{6}}, }{60}
            
underset{widehat{dfrac{3}{5}} }{50}
            
}}{300}$
            
end{document}


            Edit: Ok, with curves



            mwe



            documentclass{article}
            
usepackage{amsmath}
            
% https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/191042/11604
            
makeatletter
            
defwidebreve#1{mathop{vbox{m@thialign{##crcrnoalign{kern3p@}%
            
      brevefillcrcrnoalign{kern3p@nointerlineskip}%
            
      $hfildisplaystyle{#1}hfil$crcr}}}limits}
            

            
defbrevefill{$m@th setboxz@hbox{$braceld$}%
            
  braceluleadersvrule @heighthtz@ @depthz@hfillbraceru$}
            
makeatletter
            

            
begin{document}
            
$overset{underbrace{
            
underset{widebreve{dfrac{13}{makebox[1em]{25}}},}{12}
            
underset{widebreve{dfrac{9}{makebox[1em]{20}}},}{15}
            
underset{widebreve{dfrac{3}{makebox[1em]{4}}},}{75}
            
underset{widebreve{dfrac{1}{makebox[1em]{6}}},}{60}
            
underset{widebreve{dfrac{3}{makebox[1em]{5}}}}{50}
            
}}{300}$
            
end{document}





            share|improve this answer














            With widehat instead of curves:



            mew



            documentclass{article}
            
usepackage{amsmath}
            
begin{document}
            
$overset{underbrace{
            
underset{widehat{dfrac{13}{25},}}{12}
            
underset{widehat{dfrac{9}{20}},}{15}
            
underset{widehat{dfrac{3}{4}}, }{75}
            
underset{widehat{dfrac{1}{6}}, }{60}
            
underset{widehat{dfrac{3}{5}} }{50}
            
}}{300}$
            
end{document}


            Edit: Ok, with curves



            mwe



            documentclass{article}
            
usepackage{amsmath}
            
% https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/191042/11604
            
makeatletter
            
defwidebreve#1{mathop{vbox{m@thialign{##crcrnoalign{kern3p@}%
            
      brevefillcrcrnoalign{kern3p@nointerlineskip}%
            
      $hfildisplaystyle{#1}hfil$crcr}}}limits}
            

            
defbrevefill{$m@th setboxz@hbox{$braceld$}%
            
  braceluleadersvrule @heighthtz@ @depthz@hfillbraceru$}
            
makeatletter
            

            
begin{document}
            
$overset{underbrace{
            
underset{widebreve{dfrac{13}{makebox[1em]{25}}},}{12}
            
underset{widebreve{dfrac{9}{makebox[1em]{20}}},}{15}
            
underset{widebreve{dfrac{3}{makebox[1em]{4}}},}{75}
            
underset{widebreve{dfrac{1}{makebox[1em]{6}}},}{60}
            
underset{widebreve{dfrac{3}{makebox[1em]{5}}}}{50}
            
}}{300}$
            
end{document}






            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited Dec 8 at 18:41

























            answered Dec 8 at 15:53









            Fran

            50.7k6112175




            50.7k6112175












            • But I think that the mark should be below the top numbers, not above the 2nd row numbers.
              – Sigur
              Dec 8 at 16:03










            • It should be curved up, like half circle.
              – Sigur
              Dec 8 at 18:00










            • I think they should be under and centered with the 1st row numbers. Lets see.
              – Sigur
              Dec 8 at 18:28










            • BTW not relevant to the TeX part, but in this answer 3/5 and 1/6 are switched relative to the question (while the numbers above are not).
              – ShreevatsaR
              Dec 8 at 20:26


















            • But I think that the mark should be below the top numbers, not above the 2nd row numbers.
              – Sigur
              Dec 8 at 16:03










            • It should be curved up, like half circle.
              – Sigur
              Dec 8 at 18:00










            • I think they should be under and centered with the 1st row numbers. Lets see.
              – Sigur
              Dec 8 at 18:28










            • BTW not relevant to the TeX part, but in this answer 3/5 and 1/6 are switched relative to the question (while the numbers above are not).
              – ShreevatsaR
              Dec 8 at 20:26
















            But I think that the mark should be below the top numbers, not above the 2nd row numbers.
            – Sigur
            Dec 8 at 16:03




            But I think that the mark should be below the top numbers, not above the 2nd row numbers.
            – Sigur
            Dec 8 at 16:03












            It should be curved up, like half circle.
            – Sigur
            Dec 8 at 18:00




            It should be curved up, like half circle.
            – Sigur
            Dec 8 at 18:00












            I think they should be under and centered with the 1st row numbers. Lets see.
            – Sigur
            Dec 8 at 18:28




            I think they should be under and centered with the 1st row numbers. Lets see.
            – Sigur
            Dec 8 at 18:28












            BTW not relevant to the TeX part, but in this answer 3/5 and 1/6 are switched relative to the question (while the numbers above are not).
            – ShreevatsaR
            Dec 8 at 20:26




            BTW not relevant to the TeX part, but in this answer 3/5 and 1/6 are switched relative to the question (while the numbers above are not).
            – ShreevatsaR
            Dec 8 at 20:26










            up vote
            3
            down vote













            What about this?



            documentclass[10pt,oneside,a5paper]{article}
            
usepackage{amsmath}
            
newcommand{myfrac}[3]{overset{#1}{dfrac{#2}{#3}}}
            

            
begin{document}
            
$myfrac{12}{13}{25}, myfrac{15}{9}{20}, myfrac{75}{3}{4}, myfrac{60}{3}{5}, myfrac{50}{1}{6}$
            
end{document}


            enter image description here






            share|improve this answer





















            • I like it. But I need the curved lines above. I don't know if it's possible.Thank you!
              – Simeon Simeonov
              Dec 8 at 15:01















            up vote
            3
            down vote













            What about this?



            documentclass[10pt,oneside,a5paper]{article}
            
usepackage{amsmath}
            
newcommand{myfrac}[3]{overset{#1}{dfrac{#2}{#3}}}
            

            
begin{document}
            
$myfrac{12}{13}{25}, myfrac{15}{9}{20}, myfrac{75}{3}{4}, myfrac{60}{3}{5}, myfrac{50}{1}{6}$
            
end{document}


            enter image description here






            share|improve this answer





















            • I like it. But I need the curved lines above. I don't know if it's possible.Thank you!
              – Simeon Simeonov
              Dec 8 at 15:01













            up vote
            3
            down vote










            up vote
            3
            down vote









            What about this?



            documentclass[10pt,oneside,a5paper]{article}
            
usepackage{amsmath}
            
newcommand{myfrac}[3]{overset{#1}{dfrac{#2}{#3}}}
            

            
begin{document}
            
$myfrac{12}{13}{25}, myfrac{15}{9}{20}, myfrac{75}{3}{4}, myfrac{60}{3}{5}, myfrac{50}{1}{6}$
            
end{document}


            enter image description here






            share|improve this answer












            What about this?



            documentclass[10pt,oneside,a5paper]{article}
            
usepackage{amsmath}
            
newcommand{myfrac}[3]{overset{#1}{dfrac{#2}{#3}}}
            

            
begin{document}
            
$myfrac{12}{13}{25}, myfrac{15}{9}{20}, myfrac{75}{3}{4}, myfrac{60}{3}{5}, myfrac{50}{1}{6}$
            
end{document}


            enter image description here







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered Dec 8 at 14:55









            Sigur

            23.7k355136




            23.7k355136












            • I like it. But I need the curved lines above. I don't know if it's possible.Thank you!
              – Simeon Simeonov
              Dec 8 at 15:01


















            • I like it. But I need the curved lines above. I don't know if it's possible.Thank you!
              – Simeon Simeonov
              Dec 8 at 15:01
















            I like it. But I need the curved lines above. I don't know if it's possible.Thank you!
            – Simeon Simeonov
            Dec 8 at 15:01




            I like it. But I need the curved lines above. I don't know if it's possible.Thank you!
            – Simeon Simeonov
            Dec 8 at 15:01


















            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid …



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid …



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f463816%2ffractions-common-denominator%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            -

            Popular posts from this blog

            數位音樂下載

            Image
            數位音樂下載 為非以「實體」方式來販賣音樂的相關產品，而使用數位格式如mp3、AAC等文件格式來進行銷售販賣的一种音乐产业形式。著名的數位音樂下載服務商有iTunes Store、RecoChoku、Google Play音乐和微软Zune等。数字音乐下载在二十一世纪初一度风靡全球， [1] [2] 使得传统唱片产业走向衰落，但其自身也在2010年代流媒体音乐服务如Apple Music、Spotify等的挤压下迅速失去市场份额。 [3] [4] 数字音乐下载有便于携带、传播迅速、制作简单成本低等优点，与流媒体音乐相比也能更好保障音乐人权益； [5] 但它同时很可能带来侵犯版权和滥用的情形， [6] 也给音乐产业带来了诸多不利影响。数字音乐下载为音乐人和乐迷提供了更加便捷直接的交流渠道，也一定程度上推动了网络音乐人的出现和独立音乐的迅速发展。 [7] 目录 1 历史 1.1 技术积淀（1987-2000） 1.2 出现与兴起（2000-2004） 1.3 唱片市场的颠覆者（2004-2007） 1.4 巅峰和衰落（2005-2013） 1.5 摇摇欲坠的现状与不可预知的明天（2014至今） 2 主要文件格式 2.1 PCM编码格式 2.1.1 WAV 2.1.2 APE 2.1.3 FLAC 2.2 苹果推出的无损文件格式 2.2.1 AIFF 2.2.2 ALAC 2.3 有损压缩格式 2.3.1 MP3 2.3.2 AAC 3 主要市场 3.1 iTunes Store 3.2 Google Play音乐商店 3.3 亚马逊音乐商店 3.4 部分其他音乐商店 4 影响与评价 4.1 对音乐产业的影响 4.2 对科技行业的影响 4.3 正面评价 4.4 负面评价 4.4.1 侵权问题 4.4.2 经营模式不明晰 4.4.3 不适应移动时代 4.5 文化现象 5 延伸阅读 6 参考资料 历史 苹果iTunes+iPod的软硬件搭配让数字音
            Read more

            格利澤436b

            Image
            格利泽436b 太陽系外行星 太陽系外行星列表 艺术家笔下的格利泽436b 母恆星 母恆星 Gliese 436 星座 獅子座 赤經 ( α ) 11 h  42 m  11.0941 s [1] 赤緯 ( δ ) +26° 42′ 23.652″ [1] 距離 33.4 ly (10.2 pc) 光譜類型 M2.5 V [1] 軌道參數 半长轴 ( a ) 0.0291±0.0004 [2] AU 軌道離心率 ( e ) 0.150±0.012 [2] 公轉週期 ( P ) 2.643904±0.000005 [3] d (0.00723849 y) 軌道傾角 ( i ) 85.8 +0.21 −0.25 [3] ° 角距 ( θ ) 2.794 mas 近星點時間 ( T 0 ) 2,451,551.716 ±0.01 JD 半振幅 ( K ) 18.68±0.8 m/s 物理性质 质量 ( m ) 22.2±1.0 [2] M ⊕ 半徑 ( r ) 4.327±0.183 [2] [4] R ⊕ 密度 ( ρ ) 1.51 g cm -3 表面重力 ( g ) 1.18 g 溫度 ( T ) 712±36 [2] K 發現 發現時間 2004 發現者 巴特勒、沃格特、 馬西 et al. 發現方法 徑向速度、凌日法 發現地點 美國加利福尼亞州 發表論文 出版 其他名稱 Ross 905 b, GJ 436 b, [5] LTT 13213 b, GCTP 2704.10 b, LHS 310, AC+27:28217 b, Vyssotsky 616 b, HIP 57087 b, GEN# +9.80120068 b, LP 319-75 b, G 121-7 b, LSPM J1142+2642 b, 1RXS J114211.9+264328 b, ASCC 683818 b, G 147-68 b, UCAC2 41198281 b, BP
            Read more

            When can things happen in Etherscan, such as the picture below?

            Image
            2 I don't know why balance of the address is 0. when can this situation? etherscan balances share | improve this question asked yesterday Ru Hi Ru Hi 11 1 New contributor Ru Hi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering. Check out our Code of Conduct. add a comment  | 
            Read more